CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL FRM/EDPD/318

CARIBBEAN ADVANCED PROFICIENCY EXAMINATION

MODERATION FEEDBACK REPORT ON SCHOOL-BASED ASSESSMENT LITERATURES IN ENGLISH – UNIT 2

Name of Centre: Centre Code:

Name of Teacher: Year of Examination:

ADMINISTRATION DETAILS

Number of Assignments requested: __________

Number of Assignments received: ___________

A cover sheet, FRM/EDPD/313, was attached Yes No to the samples submitted.

Assignments were properly identified with

- Candidate’s registration number Yes No

- Topic Yes No

- Name of Centre Yes No

Marks for each assignment were entered clearly Yes No and correctly.

A completed Moderation Form, FRM/EDPD/312, was submitted with the sample of assignments. Yes No

APPROPRIATENESS OF ACTIVITIES

Topics chosen were related to the Unit Yes No

Topics chosen were appropriate to the level of the candidates. Yes No

Submissions showed sufficient evidence of candidates’ individual work. Yes No

Submissions could have been improved by

COMPLIANCE WITH SYLLABUS GUIDELINES

Assignments adhered to stipulated length. Yes No

Penalty was imposed by teacher if length was Yes No exceeded.

Assignments adhered to stipulated format. Yes No

Assignments did not include the following:

Inconsistent

Yes No

Yes No

SPECIFIC COMMENTS

The extracts/pieces chosen by candidates did not allow for exploration of concepts or analysis of issues.

Candidates needed to organize and communicate their ideas more effectively.

Candidates needed to present their personal responses that offered evaluative comments on different productions.

Presentations provided evidence that candidates had been well prepared.

OTHER COMMENTS

Revised September 2013 Chief/Assistant Chief Examiner's Initials: _________________ Date: ________________

QUALITY OF CANDIDATES’ SUBMISSIONS

The overall quality of the sample of assignments was

Excellent Satisfactory

Candidates could have improved their submissions by

QUALITY OF TEACHER’S MARKING

The teacher’s marking of the assignments was

Acceptable Severe Lenient

The teacher followed the marking criteria.

Marks were clearly shown for each of the criteria set out in the mark scheme.

Unsatisfactory

TEST CODE 02232090