cao fcat to fcat 2.0 impact data & winter diagnostics
DESCRIPTION
CAO FCAT to FCAT 2.0 Impact Data & Winter Diagnostics. January 2012. Marc Baron – Chief, Performance Accountability Mark Howard – Director, Research, Evaluation and Assessment. DRE. Impact Data. Spring FY11 FCAT 1.0 Levels vs. FCAT 2.0 Levels Percent of All Students Level 3+ - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CAOFCAT to FCAT 2.0 Impact Data
& Winter Diagnostics
January 2012
DRE
Marc Baron – Chief, Performance AccountabilityMark Howard – Director, Research, Evaluation and Assessment
Impact Data• Spring FY11 FCAT 1.0 Levels
vs. FCAT 2.0 Levels• Percent of All Students Level 3+• Combined Grade Levels
DRE
Source of Graphs for Elementary Families>>Test Results and Other Assessment Information >>Diagnostics>> Students with Change in Predicted Levels –
RTSDA0518 and Schools-New Levels 4 Ways
Reading and MathPct in each level and level3+
Each grade at schoolCombined grade for school
Grades 3-5 & 6-8 Reading and Math Level 3+ Percent
FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0
Grades 3-5 & 6-8 Reading and Math Level 3+ Percent
Percent Change FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0
Elementary Reading Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0
Elementary Math Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0
Middle School Reading Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0
Middle School Math Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0
Charter Schools Reading Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0
Charter Schools Math Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0
Alternative Schools Reading Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0
Alternative Schools Math Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0
Source of Graphs for Elementary Families>>Test Results and Other Assessment Information >>Diagnostics>> Students with Change in Predicted Levels –
RTSDA0518 and Schools-New Levels 4 Ways
Reading and MathPct in each level and level3+
Each grade at schoolCombined grade for school
Difference between Fall & Winter
Fall to Winter Diagnostic Data• Already reviewed–Standard–Self–Others• Look fors:–Extremes (highest and lowest)–Outliers (discontinuous progression)
DRE
FY12 Fall to Winter Reading DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 3-5 Reading L3+
+9
-9
…………schools………………..
CHANGE
FY12 Fall to Winter Reading DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 3 Reading L3+
+17
-12
CHANGE
FY12 Fall to Winter Reading DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 4 Reading L3+
+23
-10
CHANGE
FY12 Fall to Winter Reading DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 5 Reading L3+
+13
-17
CHANGE
FY12 Fall to Winter Math DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 3-5 Math L3+
+17
-10
CHANGE
FY12 Fall to Winter Math DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 3 Math L3++40
-16
CHANGE
FY12 Fall to Winter Math DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 4 Math L3++24
-19
CHANGE
FY12 Fall to Winter Math DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 5 Math L3++24
-17
CHANGE
FY12 Fall to Winter Science DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 3-5 Science L3+
+8
-11
CHANGE
FY12 Fall to Winter Science DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 3 Science L3+
+18
-15
CHANGE
FY12 Fall to Winter Science DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 4 MathL3+
+17
-24
CHANGE
FY12 Fall to Winter Science DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 5 Science L3+
+15
-22
CHANGE
Winter Diagnostic Data• Winter FY11 to Winter FY12• All tested students• Diamond Report
DRE
Diamond ReportBenchmarks and Focus Areas
DRE
Know your instructional targets
Winter Diagnostic Grade 3 Math Sorted difference in change lowest to highest
Winter Diagnostic Grade 3 Math Sorted difference in change lowest to highest
Equivalent fractions
Equivalent fractions
Equivalent fractions
Equivalent fractions
Equivalent fractions
Fraction size
Equivalent fractions
MA 3 A 2 1
68 31 -37
71 36 -35
Winter Diagnostic Grade 4 Math Sorted difference in change lowest to highest
Winter Diagnostic Grade 4 Math Sorted difference in change lowest to highest
Equivalent fractions
Equivalent fractions
Fraction to decimal
MA 4 A 6 3
58 26 -32
43 20 -23
Winter Diagnostic Grade 5 Math Sorted difference in change lowest to highest
Winter Diagnostic Grade 5 Math Sorted difference in change lowest to highest
Prime Factorization
MA 5 A 2 4
43 27 -16Prime Factorization
Order of Operations
Order of Operations 41 49 8
Winter Diagnostic Grade 3 Reading Sorted difference in change lowest to highest
Winter Diagnostic Grade 4 Reading Sorted difference in change lowest to highest
Winter Diagnostic Grade 5 Reading Sorted difference in change lowest to highest
Winter FY11 to Winter FY12 Diagnostic ResultsAverage Item Percent Correct
Reading Benchmark Patterns/Focus
Math Benchmark Patterns/Focus
Grade 3None MA 3 A 2 1
Grade 4None MA 4 A 6 3
Grade 5None MA 5 A 2 4
Review District Diamond Reports
Equivalent fractions
Equivalent fractions
Prime Factorization
Order of Operations
Summary• FCAT to FCAT 2.0 Impact Data– Less proficient students across grade levels– Some schools impacted greater than others
• Fall to Winter Diagnostics– Some schools impacted greater than others
• Winter to Winter Item Analysis– General decline – Math impacted greater than reading– Differential performance by benchmark/focus