canada's imperial arctic makeover

Upload: committee-for-the-republic-of-canada

Post on 04-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Canada's Imperial Arctic Makeover

    1/2

    In 2007, headlines across Canada echoed the spirit

    of the Cold war, as Canadian Defense Minister Pe-

    ter Mackay screamed that Canadas arctic sover-eignty was threatened and that a greedy resource

    grab of valuable Canadian territory had occurred.

    Stephen Harper immediately announced plans to

    purchase three arctic patrol ships, (later confirming

    three unmanned drones) to defend Canadas true

    north strong and free. The Russian aggressors

    had to be put in their place. What had provoked thisunbalanced response from a Canada that had dem-

    onstrated no active interest in the Arctic or its de-velopment for decades? As it turned out, a Russian

    submarine had placed a Russian flag near the North

    Pole along a disputed territory known as the Lo-

    monosov Ridge. As facts would later reveal, the

    Russian submarine was on nothing more than a sci-

    entific study.

    While large components of the abrupt militarization

    of the Arctic announced by Harper in 2007, were

    put on hold due to the economic crisis that spiked

    in 2009, it had not at all disappeared, as we now

    find the seeds of this orchestrated tension springing

    up yet again. This is evidenced by the October 5th

    announcement of the Canadian Geological Survey

    and Natural Resources Canada that 1.75 million

    square kilometres of seabed in the Arctic and North

    Atlantic oceans are definitively the sole property of

    Canada. These claims are the substance of a multi-thousand page submission of 25 studies submitted

    in October to the United Nations Convention on the

    Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) which had adopted a

    new formula for determining national coastalboundaries in 2003. Nations had been given 10

    years to conduct studies and submit claims for ex-

    panded territory beyond the current 12 nauticalmiles (22.2 km) off coastal land. If these claims are

    approved, then Canadas current area of 9.9 millionsquare kilometres will increase by 20% (or the size

    of Quebec). Two of the most important territorial

    claims involve the Alpha Ridge mountain extend-ing past the North Pole, and the other is the Lo-

    monosov Ridge.

    The Seeds of World War Begin to

    Grow

    Today, as tense hotspots have been built up in Syria

    and Iran, which could easily unfold into a nuclear

    showdown between Russia and China pitted against

    NATO countries, a less understood component to

    the orchestration of general war exists in the do-

    main of territorial conflicts around the Pacific, Arc-tic and Atlantic Oceans.

    This strategy cannot be understood unless thereader comprehend that the only opposition to anew British Empire (one world government) is tobe found in the coalition of Russia, China and Ar-gentina.

    The New Canada Imperial Arctic Makeover:

    Will Increased Canadian Arctic Territory beused to Provoke War with Russia?By Matthew Ehret-Kump

  • 7/30/2019 Canada's Imperial Arctic Makeover

    2/2

    2

    These three nations have made their full national

    policy commitments center on the right to nationalsovereignty, international cooperation, technologi-

    cal progress, and have committed to effective war

    avoidance measures ever since the assassination of

    Libyas President Gaddafi. Nations of the non-

    aligned movement representing over two thirdsof the world population have rallied strongly

    around these three pillars.

    In the Pacific Ocean, Japans brash nationalizationof the five uninhabited islets (known by Japan as

    Senkaku and by China as Diaoyu) has re-sulted in an international crisis pitting China

    against Japan. China faces the danger of another

    territorial conflict sparked by the the President of

    the Philippines who decided late in 2011 that the

    South China Sea should be re-named the East

    Philippines Sea. What most media reports leaveout when discussing these hot spots, is that both

    the Philippine President Benigno Aquino III, as

    well as the Japan President Noda, have both

    agreed recently to host U.S. military bases as part

    of the new Air-Sea battle plan designed around the

    containment of China and documented in La-

    RouchePACs recent feature film Unsurvivable

    (1). This military strategy has seen two U.S Ohio

    class submarines deployed to the Pacific theatre,

    each packing Trident nuclear warheads.

    Other more official British colonies such as Aus-tralia are being used to contain China within the

    new Air-Sea Battle Plan, as Australian PM JuliaGillard has agreed to host two US military bases

    on its territory which Chinese military officials

    have identified as representing direct strategic

    threats. Due to the new UNCLOS measures, Aus-

    tralia has recently expanded its undersea territory

    by 2.5 million square kilometres (or 1/3 its total

    land area) in 2008.

    As small minded (often unwitting) pawns of the

    British Empire do the Matriarchs dirty work on

    the Pacific theatre, the British military has sprunginto aggressive direct action in the Atlantic as a

    response to Argentinas recent re-affirmation thatthe Malvinas Islands are (and have always been) a

    part of Argentina. Indeed, the Islands were in fact

    stolen by the British Empire during the early 1833war with Argentina, and have been maintained as

    a British colony ever since. The British response

    to Argentinas claim has been to 1) reject all Ar-gentine offers of dialogue and 2) deploy a De-

    stroyer battleship and one of its four HMS Van-

    guard nuclear armed submarines to the coast of the

    Malvinas (which they continue to call the

    Falklands). The irony in this instance is thatBritains basis for its military deployment is cen-tered on its accusation that Argentina is acting like

    a colonialist. This absurd accusation persists,despite Argentine President Christina Kirchners

    insistence of the fact that Britains continuedclaim of the Falklands remains illegitimate ac-cording to the UN Special Committee on Decolo-

    nization.

    The Consequences of Ignoring

    Reality

    One year after Russia was scorned by Peter Mac-

    kay and Harper for

    trying to steal Can-adas arctic sover-

    eignty, Russia hadfound itself the sub-

    ject of an attack by

    Soros Georgian pup-

    pet president MikheilSaakashvili in 2008.

    Saakashvilis attack

    on Russias protector-ate in South Ossetia

    resulted in a brief war that ended five days after

    having begun. Saakashvili attempted to illegally

    claim South Ossetia as Georgian territory. At that

    time, Georgia was not a part of NATO, and had it

    been, all relevant NATO members would have

    been drawn into that conflict in Georgias defence.Today, Saakashvili has been replaced by yet an-

    other billionaire puppet that has made Georgias

    admission to NATO a primary objective.

    With literally dozens of explosive powder kegsplaced all around the world which couldnt existas detonators for war were it not for the belief in

    resource scarcity and monetary rules to whichour behaviour and thoughts must conform, the

    world is sitting on the edge of a self-imposed ex-

    tinction.

    (1) www.larouchepac.com/unsurvivable

    Russian tanks in Georgia dur-

    ing the five day war in 2008.