campaign finance federal election campaign act buckley v. valeo bipartisan campaign reform act...
TRANSCRIPT
Campaign Finance
Federal Election Campaign Act Buckley v. Valeo Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act McConnell v. FEC
Money is the mother’s milk of politics.— Jesse Unruh, Speaker, California
House of Representatives
Illinois 8th District
Year Candidate ReceiptsPAC
Contributions %
2008R: GreenbergD: Bean
$940,000$3.0 mil
$110,000$1.65 mil
12%55%
2006R: McSweeneyD: Bean
$5.1 mil$4.3 mil
$460,000$1.5 mil
9%35%
2004R: CraneD: Bean
$1.6 mil$1.6 mil
$1.2 mil$491,000
73%31%
2002R: CraneD: Bean
$695,000$329,000
$550,000$107,000
79%32%
2000R: CraneD: Pressl
$1.1 mil$285,000
$680,000$46,000
64%16%
House Campaign Expenses
27%
24%13%
8%
15%
3%7%
3%
Electronic Media AdvertisingOverheadFundraisingActual CampaigningPersuasion MailPollingOther ExpensesOther Media
Senate Campaign Expenses
42%
24%
20%
5%3%3% 2%1%
Electronic Media AdvertisingOverheadFundraisingActual CampaigningPersuasion MailPollingOther ExpensesOther Media
Hard Money v Soft Money Hard Money:
Political contributions given to a party, candidate, or interest group that are limited in amount and fully disclosed.
Soft Money: Funds obtained by political parties that are spent on party activities, such as get out the vote drives, not on behalf of a specific candidate.
Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971
Contribution Limits: By PACs, individuals, parties From candidates to own
campaigns
FECA: Contribution Limits
Recipients
Donors Candidate PAC Party TOTAL
Individual $1,000 $5,000 $20,000 $25,000
MC PAC $5,000 $5,000 $15,000 NL
Party $5,000 NA NA NL
Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971
Contribution Limits: By PACs, individuals, parties From candidates to own
campaignsExpenditure Limits: Candidates Groups independent of
candidates
Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971
Contribution Limits: By PACs, individuals, parties From candidates to own
campaignsExpenditure Limits: Candidates Groups independent of
candidatesPublic Funding: Presidential primary candidates Presidential election candidates
FECA: Public Funding
1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004
Public Funds
23.7 29.6 35.4 65.4 38.8 56.3 55.8 26.5
Camp. Costs
66.8 127.8 135.7 208.6 117.0 233.1 328.6 599.6
% 35.5 23.2 26.1 31.4 33.2 24.2 17.0 4.4
Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971
Contribution Limits: By PACs, individuals, parties From candidates to own
campaignsExpenditure Limits: Candidates Groups independent of
candidatesPublic Funding: Presidential primary candidates Presidential election candidatesDisclosure and Enforcement: FEC
Buckley v. Valeo (1976)
Before After
Contribution Limits: By PACs, individuals, parties From candidates to own
campaignsExpenditure Limits: Candidates Groups independent of
candidatesPublic Funding: Presidential primary candidates Presidential election candidatesDisclosure and Enforcement: FEC
Contribution Limits: By PACs, individuals, parties
Public Funding: Presidential primary candidates Presidential election candidatesDisclosure and Enforcement: FEC
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
Increased contribution limits
BCRA: Per Candidate Contribution Limits
Recipients
Donors Candidate PAC Party TOTAL
Individual $2,000 $5,000 $25,000 $95,000
MC PAC $5,000 $5,000 $15,000 NL
Party $5,000 NA NA NL
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
Increased contribution limits Prohibited national parties from raising
or spending soft money
Soft Money Contributions (in millions), 1992-2002
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
Democrat Republican
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
Increased contribution limits Prohibited national parties from raising
or spending soft money Required state and local parties to pay
for federal elections with hard money
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
Increased contribution limits Prohibited national parties from raising
or spending soft money Required state and local parties to pay
for federal elections with hard money Prohibited federal candidates from
raising or spending soft money
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
Increased contribution limits Prohibited national parties from raising
or spending soft money Required state and local parties to pay
for federal elections with hard money Prohibited federal candidates from
raising or spending soft money Prohibited corporations and unions from
using soft money for electioneering communications
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
Increased contribution limits Prohibited national parties from raising
or spending soft money Required state and local parties to pay
for federal elections with hard money Prohibited federal candidates from
raising or spending soft money Prohibited corporations and unions from
using soft money for electioneering communications
Required disclosure of electioneering communications
Electioneering Communications
Broadcast, cable or satellite communication;
That refers to a clearly identified federal candidate;
Is publicly distributed by a television station, radio station, cable television system or satellite system for a fee; and
Is distributed within 60 days prior to a general election or 30 days prior to a primary election to federal office.
Electioneering Communications
Sponsor: Kentucky Democratic Party
Ad Frequency: 663 times between October 22 and November 3, 1998
ANNOUNCER: If Congressman Bunning gets his way, everything from milk to medicine would cost 30% more. Last week Jim Bunning said quote, "We ought to have a national sales tax." That's right, Bunning would create a whole new federal tax. Bunning wants to raise our taxes, but voted for a tax loophole that has let billionaires renounce their citizenship to avoid paying U.S. taxes. Tell Bunning, no loophole for billionaires, no new sales tax for working people.
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
Increased contribution limits Prohibited national parties from raising
or spending soft money Required state and local parties to pay
for federal elections with hard money Prohibited federal candidates from
raising or spending soft money Prohibited corporations and unions from
using soft money for electioneering communications
Required disclosure of electioneering communications
Required political parties to choose between making coordinated expenditures OR independent expenditures, but not both
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
Increased contribution limits Prohibited national parties from raising
or spending soft money Required state and local parties to pay
for federal elections with hard money Prohibited federal candidates from
raising or spending soft money Prohibited corporations and unions from
using soft money for electioneering communications
Required disclosure of electioneering communications
Required political parties to choose between making coordinated expenditures OR independent expenditures, but not both
Prohibited minors from contributing
McConnell v. FEC (2003)
Before After Increased contribution limits Prohibited national parties from raising
or spending soft money Required state and local parties to pay
for federal elections with hard money Prohibited federal candidates from
raising or spending soft money Prohibited corporations and unions from
using soft money for electioneering communications
Required disclosure of electioneering communications
Required political parties to choose between making coordinated expenditures OR independent expenditures, but not both
Prohibited minors from contributing
Increased contribution limits Prohibited national parties from raising
or spending soft money Required state and local parties to pay
for federal elections with hard money Prohibited federal candidates from
raising or spending soft money Prohibited corporations and unions from
using soft money for electioneering communications
Required disclosure of electioneering communications
527’S (THE NEW SOFT $$) Named for the IRS tax code that
gives life to these committees A 527 group is created primarily to
influence the nomination, election, appointment or defeat of candidates for public office.
Not subject to campaign finance laws
527 Committees
CycleAll 527s* Receipts
All 527s* Expenses
527s (Excluding StateCandidates & Parties)* Receipts
527s (Excluding StateCandidates & Parties)* Expenses
2004$599,202,432
$611,723,836
$434,023,186
$442,472,913
2006$384,911,172
$429,380,273
$165,518,800
$206,337,527
2008$425,561,881
$374,187,522
$201,276,654
$198,753,309
Top 5 Committees Receiving Money
Committee 2008 Receipts
Service Employees International Union
$23,902,467
America Votes $21,407,440
American Solutions Winning the Future
$18,593,115
The Fund for America $12,142,046
EMILY's List $11,659,922
See the full list
Top 5 Committees Receiving Money