caltech pedestrian testing data(g-i): performance under varying levels of occlusion (computed for...

1
Caltech Pedestrian Testing Data overall & aspect ratio (a) Overall (b) Typical aspect ratios (c) Atypical aspect ratios scale (d) Near scale (e) Medium scale (f) Far scale occlusion (g) No occlusion (h) Partial occlusion (i) Heavy occlusion Figure 1: Miss rates versus false positive per-image curves shown for various subsets of the data. Lower curves indicate better per- formance; the log-average miss rate for each detector is shown in plot legends. (a) Overall performance on the entire dataset. (b-c) Performance w.r.t. aspect ratio (computed for unoccluded pedestrians 50 pixels or taller). (d-f): Performance w.r.t. scale (computed for unoccluded pedestrians). (g-i): Performance under varying levels of occlusion (computed for pedestrians 50 pixels or taller). 1

Upload: others

Post on 24-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Caltech Pedestrian Testing Data(g-i): Performance under varying levels of occlusion (computed for pedestrians 50 pixels or taller). 1. 4307 4007 .05 2907 GDFL 6 F-DNN2+SS 6 ADM 6 TLL-TFA

Caltech Pedestrian Testing Data

over

all&

aspe

ctra

tio

(a) Overall (b) Typical aspect ratios (c) Atypical aspect ratios

scal

e

(d) Near scale (e) Medium scale (f) Far scale

occl

usio

n

(g) No occlusion (h) Partial occlusion (i) Heavy occlusion

Figure 1: Miss rates versus false positive per-image curves shown for various subsets of the data. Lower curves indicate better per-formance; the log-average miss rate for each detector is shown in plot legends. (a) Overall performance on the entire dataset. (b-c)Performance w.r.t. aspect ratio (computed for unoccluded pedestrians 50 pixels or taller). (d-f): Performance w.r.t. scale (computed forunoccluded pedestrians). (g-i): Performance under varying levels of occlusion (computed for pedestrians 50 pixels or taller).

1