by luis ortiz blanco, partner garrigues
DESCRIPTION
Best Practices on the conduct of proceedings concerning Articles 101 and 102 TFEU: Talking business, or real business? GCLC Lunch Talk Series, Hilton Hotel, Brussels, 18 March 2010. By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues. Introduction. Part I: Business: what’s in cvgfd - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Best Practices on the conduct of proceedings concerning Articles 101 and
102 TFEU: Talking business, or real business?
GCLC Lunch Talk Series, Hilton Hotel, Brussels, 18 March 2010
By Luis Ortiz Blanco,
Partner Garrigues
![Page 2: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Introduction
Part I: Business: what’s in cvgfd
Part II: Real business: what’s not
![Page 3: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Business (or what’s in) (1): General
Scope of the Best Practices
Exclusions (§§ 2-3)
What about Articles 8 (interim measures) and 10 (declaration of inapplicability) of Regulation 1/2003?
Legal Status: § 7 in fine: Best Practices “do not alter the Commission’s interpretative notices relevant for the conduct of proceedings”
![Page 4: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Business (or what’s in) (2): Infringement procedures (i)
Initial assessment:
Transparency – § 14
Reaction to complaints – § 15
Opening of proceedings:
Dealing with the case in a timely manner (§ 17)
Decision to open proceedings (§ 18)
Publicity (§§ 19-21; closing: §§ 70 & 100)
Extension of the scope and/or addressees (§ 22)
![Page 5: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Business (or what’s in) (3): Infringement procedures (ii)
Languages (§§ 24-29 & 106)
Information requests
Scope (§§ 31-33)
Statements/Interviews (§§ 43-45)
Legal Professional Privilege
![Page 6: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Business (or what’s in) (4): Infringement procedures (iii)
Meetings
In general: Minutes (§§ 39-40)
State of Play meetings (§§ 54-60)
Triangular meetings (§§ 61-63)
Meetings with the Commissioner or the Director General (§ 64)
Review of key submissions
Complaints (§ 65)
Other key submissions (§§ 67-68)
![Page 7: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Business (or what’s in) (5): Infringement procedures (iv)
Right to be heard
The S/O and fines (§ 77)
The S/O and remedies (§ 78)
The S/O and publicity (§ 79)
Access to file
Standard (§§ 80-82)
Negotiated disclosure (§ 84)
Data Room (§ 85)
![Page 8: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Business (or what’s in) (6): Infringement procedures (v)
Written reply to the S/O
Access to others’ replies to the S/O (§ 89)
Supplementary S/O (§ 96)
Letter of facts (§ 97)
New access to file (§ 98)
Possible outcomes of this phase (§ 100)
![Page 9: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Business (or what’s in) (7): Commitment procedures
Initiation of commitment discussions (§§ 104-106)
Preliminary assessment (§§ 107-110)
No access to file?
Submission of the commitments (§§ 111-113)
Market test and subsequent discussions; negative results of the test (§§ 114-118)
![Page 10: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Business (or what’s in) (8): Rejection of complaints
Grounds for rejection (§§ 120-123)
Procedure (§§ 124-126)
![Page 11: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Business (or what’s in) (9): Adoption, notifications and publication of decisions
Adoption and notification (§§ 130-133)
Publication of decisions (§§ 134-136)
![Page 12: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Business (or what’s in) (10) Conclusions on the Best Practices
Good codification
Interesting novelties
Enhanced transparency
Plenty of good intentions… but turn them into action (scape clauses)
However, let’s talk real business
![Page 13: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Real Business (or what’s not in) (1)
The origin of the “Best Practices” document:
Is “what’s not in”, in reality, what has brought about “what’s in” (Best Practices)? (Mounting pressure on DG Comp about procedures)
Or is it the request to have the “Manual de Procedure” unveiled?
Or possibly the latest Ombudsman’s views about DG Comp procedures?
Or The Economist?
Or rather the TEU and TFEU provisions concerning the ECHR and the likely accession of the EU to the Rome Convention shortly?
![Page 14: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Real Business (or what’s not in) (2)
The sufficiency of the “Best Practices” document:
Are “Best Practices” enough?
Would the “Manuel de Procedures” be enough?
Would a EU General Code of Procedure be enough?
Caesar’s wife…
![Page 15: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Real Business (or what’s not in) (3)
The real problem: Proportionality in procedural guarantees (“parking ticket” procedure; gap bigger and bigger over time)
The solution: Matching types of cases with types of procedure (the higher the likely punishment, the higher the procedural guarantees)
![Page 16: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Real Business (or what’s not in) (4)
Three basic types of cases
Four basic types of procedures
Three-step approach
![Page 17: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Real Business (or what’s not in) (5)
Type 1 Cases:
Article 7 purely declaratory decisions with cease and desist orders (including interim measures) – No (positive) injunction;
Commitment decisions (Article 8); and
Finding of inapplicability (Article 10)
![Page 18: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Real Business (or what’s not in) (6)
Type 2 Cases:
Article 7 decisions with injunctions in the form of behavioural remedies (including interim measures);
Fines up to a certain amount (e.g. 10M€) per company and/or infringement
![Page 19: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Real Business (or what’s not in) (7)
Type 3 Cases:
Article 7 decisions with injunctions in the form of structural remedies (including interim measures);
Fines higher than a certain amount (e.g. 10M€) per company and/or infringement
![Page 20: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Real Business (or what’s not in) (8)
Type 1 Procedures: Standard Administrative Procedures
Type 2 Procedures: Enhanced Administrative Procedures (i)
Split investigation and adjudication by transforming the Hearing Officers into Administrative Judges (FTC-style) (final decisions adopted by the College of Commissioners).
Holding public hearings
![Page 21: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Real Business (or what’s not in) (9)
Type 3 Procedures: Enhanced Administrative Procedures (ii)
Type 2 procedural guarantees, with adjudication entrusted to selected Commissioners (competition Commissioner plus, e.g. two other Commissioners, in turns).
Type 4 Procedures: Judicial Procedures
DG Comp transformed into pure prosecutor;
Adjudication entrusted to judges (Treaty adaptations needed)
![Page 22: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Real Business (or what’s not in) (10)
Matching Type of Case with Type of Procedure (I)
Present situation
Case Type 1
Procedure Type 1
Case Type 2
Case Type 3
![Page 23: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Real Business (or what’s not in) (11)
Matching Type of Case with Type of Procedure (II)
First Phase
Case Type 1
Procedure Type 1Case Type 2
Case Type 3 Procedure Type 2
![Page 24: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Real Business (or what’s not in) (12)
Matching Type of Case with Type of Procedure (III)
Second Phase
Case Type 1 Procedure Type 1
Case Type 2 Procedure Type 2
Case Type 3 Procedure Type 3
![Page 25: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Real Business (or what’s not in) (12)
Matching Type of Case with Type of Procedure (IV)
Third Phase
Case Type 1 Procedure Type 1
Case Type 2 Procedure Type 2
Case Type 3 Procedure Type 3
![Page 26: By Luis Ortiz Blanco, Partner Garrigues](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081516/5681479b550346895db4d097/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Conclusions on the improvement of EU antitrust Procedures
Pressure is mounting
Man Proc and access to information
Ombudsman
Etc
Convenience of adopting a General Code of Procedure
Need to respect proportionality
ECHR Accession by EU
ECtHR to examine appropriateness of EU antitrust procedures
Need to evolve towards better adapted procedural solutions
Thank you for your attention