buttercup study

21
Buttercup Study

Upload: makana

Post on 04-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Buttercup Study. Buttercup Study. Treatment Breakdown Data Collection. Results and Implications. Buttercup Study. Treatment Breakdown Data Collection. Results and Implications. Plot Layout. Rep I. Rep II. 101. 102. 103. 201. 202. 203. 104. 105. 106. 204. 205. 206. Rep III. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Buttercup Study

Buttercup Study

Page 2: Buttercup Study

Buttercup Study• Treatment Breakdown

• Data Collection•Results and Implications

Page 3: Buttercup Study

Buttercup Study• Treatment Breakdown

• Data Collection•Results and Implications

Page 4: Buttercup Study

Rep I Rep II

101 103102

106105104

201 203202

206205204

Plot Layout

Rep III

301 303302

306305304

Rep IV

401 403402

406405404

Page 5: Buttercup Study

Rep I Rep II

101 103102

106105104

201 203202

206205204

Plot Layout

Rep III

301 303302

306305304

Rep IV

401 403402

406405404

40 ft40 ft

40 ft

Page 6: Buttercup Study

Rep I Rep II

101 103102

106105104

201 203202

206205204

Aeration Treatment

Rep III

301 303302

306305304

Rep IV

401 403402

406405404

No Aeration

Aeration No Aeration

No Aeration

No Aeration

Aeration

Aeration

Aeration

Page 7: Buttercup Study

Rep I Rep II

101 103102

106105104

201 203202

206205204

Fertilization Treatment

Rep III

301 303302

306305304

Rep IV

401 403402

406405404

FertilizerNo

Addition

Fertilizer+

Lime

Fertilizer

Fertilizer

FertilizerNo

Addition

No Addition

No Addition

Fertilizer+

Lime

Fertilizer+

Lime

Fertilizer+

Lime

Page 8: Buttercup Study

Aerway

Aeration-Twice in 2002-Once in 2003

Page 9: Buttercup Study

Fertilization

• Spring 2002: ~ 3800 lbs/ac lime applied

• Spring 2003: ~ 4480 lbs/ac lime applied

• 2004: no lime applied– pH approaching 6.5 goal (up from ~5.7)

Page 10: Buttercup Study

Buttercup Study• Treatment Breakdown

• Data Collection•Results and Implications

Page 12: Buttercup Study

Pasture Samples

Page 13: Buttercup Study

Pasture Sample Separations

Page 14: Buttercup Study

Cow Counting

Page 15: Buttercup Study

• 40 readings / transect• 4 transects / plot• 24 plots

Transects

Sample Plot

Transects

Page 16: Buttercup Study

Buttercup Study• Treatment Breakdown

• Data Collection•Results and Implications

Page 17: Buttercup Study

Soil Fertility Mean Results

Fertilizerppm Phos

ppm K

ppm Ca

None 16.5 77.0 1302.5

Fertilizer only 16.5 86.0 1249.0

Fertilizer + Lime 18.5 70.5 2223.5

pH

6.05

5.95

6.80

Page 18: Buttercup Study

Botanical Composition Mean Results: Fertilization

Fertilizer%

Buttercup%

Legume% Grass

None 3.4 4.9 60.6Fertilizer

only 3.3 6.4 64.1Fertilizer +

Lime 2.6 12.0 62.8

Page 19: Buttercup Study

Botanical Composition Mean Results: Aeration

Aeration%

Buttercup%

Legume%

Grass

Yes 1.9 4.5 61.5

No 4.3 11.0 63.6

Page 20: Buttercup Study

Summary of Results

• Soil tests: –Liming increased Ca levels and pH

• Forage Samples:–Legume percentage increased with

liming–Buttercup percentage decreased

with aeration• Transect data: insignificant• Cow counting data: insignificant

Page 21: Buttercup Study

Buttercup Study• Treatment Breakdown

• Data Collection•Results and Implications