building information technologies arch 421 fall 2014 ... · autodesk: revit, vault, navisworks,...

20
WEEK 1: COURSE INTRO + SYLLABUS BUILDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES | ARCH 421 | FALL 2014 COLLABORATIVE DESIGN WORKFLOWS Federico Garcia Lammers, Assoc. AIA | Assistant Professor | DoArch | South Dakota State University

Upload: others

Post on 21-Apr-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

WEEK 1: COURSE INTRO + SYLLABUS

BUILDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES | ARCH 421 | FALL 2014

COLLABORATIVE DESIGN WORKFLOWSFederico Garcia Lammers, Assoc. AIA | Assistant Professor | DoArch | South Dakota State University

MY BUILDING...

Building / Constructi on Industry

Architectural Educati on / Practi ce

WHOSE BUILDING?

ARCH 421 | pg 2IMAGE | AUTHORSHIP vs RESPONSIBILITY, Federico Garcia Lammers

WORKFLOW=SEQUENTIAL ORGANIZATION &

AUTHORINGOF EVENTS & PROCESSES.

ARCH 421 | pg 3

DESIGNING WORKFLOWSIf architects can re-prioriti ze authorship of processes over authorships of things, we can reassemble creati on and executi on, and re-synthesize form and functi on. We will regain liability, but harvest control and we will be able to happily navigate from concept to generati on, through politi cs, value-engineering, and procurement strategies, to punch lists and opening parti es. We will harbor less self-pity, make more money, and construct bett er architecture. Joshua Prince-Ramus, 2010

ARCH 421 | pg 4QUOTE | www.vmspace.com, Joshua Prince-Ramus

ARCH 421 | pg 5IMAGE | Formula 1 Grand Prix, Sao Paulo, Ayrton Senna

ARCH 421 | pg 6IMAGE | LEFT: Formula 1 Lotus Team Car | RIGHT: Liverpool Department Store, Michel Rojkind Arquitecto

PG 01 | FALL 2014 | ARCH 421 | BUILDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES: COLLABORATIVE DESIGN WORKFLOWS | GARCIA LAMMERS

BUILDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES | ARCH 421 | FALL 2014

COLLABORATIVE DESIGN WORKFLOWSFederico Garcia Lammers, Assoc. AIA | Assistant Professor | DoArch | South Dakota State University

KEY QUESTIONS 1. What is Building Informati on Technology and Building Informati on Modeling?

2. What are the diff erences between computer aided draft ing methods and building informati on methods?

3. How has the increase in data associated with BIM aff ected the link between design and building?

4. What is the role of the architect in Building Informati on Technologies/Modeling workfl ows?

5. What are the implicati ons of using digital tools as both methods of visualizati on and direct fabricati on?

COURSE DESCRIPTION

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Digital technology conti nues to transform the manner in which architects design, communicate, collaborateand are educated today. Building Informati on Technologies and Modeling (BIM) are collaborati ve methods that integrate digital tools as a means to consolidate and create a shared network of data within design and building processes. The integrati on of digital technologies are fundamental in order to establish producti ve workfl ows that help advance relati onships within the Architecture, Engineering and Constructi on (AEC) industry. Through this course students will become familiar with the conceptual framework and practi cal applicati on of some of the leading digital tools used in BIT and BIM.

1. Understand the integrati on of digital tools within design and building processes.

2. Describe the implicati ons and workfl ow of BIM projects.

3. Demonstrate clear visual communicati on techniques through technical documentati on.

4. Demonstrate rigorous research methods through documentati on of comprehensive design processes.

5. Assess the role of producti ve workfl ows as means of collaborati on within diff erent disciplines.

COURSE INFORMATION

CONTACT INFORMATION

ARCH 421 | BUILDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES: COLLABORATIVE DESIGN WORKFLOWSDepartment of Architecture (DoArch) | South Dakota State University | Credits: 2Wednesday: 8:00 - 9:50am | Crothers Engineering Hall: room 320Collaborati on Sessions and student pinups will be held at presentati on space in Depuy.Prerequisite course: ARCH 321

Federico Garcia Lammers, Assoc. AIA | Assistant Professor | DoArch | South Dakota State University

Email: [email protected] Offi ce: Harding Hall 316 Monday 2:00pm - 5:00pm, Wednesday 2:00pm - 5:00pm, or by appointment.

Website: doarchworkfl ows2014.wordpress.com and D2L (dropbox only)

If architects can re-prioriti ze authorship of processes over authorships of things, we can reassemble creati on and executi on, and re-synthesize form and functi on. We will regain liability, but harvest control and we will be able to happily navigate from concept to generati on, through politi cs, value-engineering, and procurement strategies, to punch lists and opening parti es. We will harbor less self-pity, make more money, and construct bett er architecture.

Joshua Prince-Ramus, 2010.

This lecture and workshop course will focus on the integrati on and study of

workfl ows associated with Building Informati on Technologies (BIT) and their

role in the building process from ideati on to maintenance. (htt p://catalog.sdstate.edu/)

All emails MUST include ARCH 421 as the subject of the email. Students MUST identi fy themselves in emails. Instructor will respond to emails within 48hrs, not

including weekends.

UNStudio | Mercedes Benz Museum. Stutt gart, Germany

ARCH 421 | pg 7IMAGE | Syllabus, Page 01

LEARNING OBJECTIVES1. Understand the integrati on of digital tools within design and building processes.

2. Understand the implicati ons and workfl ow of BIM projects.

3. Demonstrate clear visual communicati on techniques through technical documentati on.

4. Demonstrate rigorous research methods through documentati on of comprehensive design processes.

5. Assess the role of producti ve workfl ows as means of collaborati on within diff erent disciplines.

ARCH 421 | pg 8IMAGE | Syllabus: Learning Objecti ves

KEY QUESTIONS

1. What is Building Informati on Technology and Building Informati on Modeling?

2. What are the diff erences between computer aided draft ing methods and building informati on methods?

3. How has the increase in informati on associated with BIM aff ected the link between design and building?

4. What is the role of the architect within a Building Informati on Technologies/Modeling workfl ow?

5. What are the implicati ons of using digital tools as both methods of visualizati on and direct fabricati on?

ARCH 421 | pg 9IMAGE | Syllabus: Key Questi ons

PG 02 | FALL 2014 | ARCH 421 | BUILDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES: COLLABORATIVE DESIGN WORKFLOWS | GARCIA LAMMERS

METHODS OF ASSESSMENT

GRADING CRITERIA One of the fundamental issues addressed in this course is the development of producti ve workfl ows. Establishing individual and collecti ve workfl ows are key pieces of demonstrati ng responsibility and meeti ng course expectati ons. As a result, NO extra credit, make-ups, or late submissions will be accepted in this course. If a student cannot submit their work on the specifi ed due date, they should coordinate with their instructor in order to submit their work at an earlier date or have a classmate hand in their work.

10 pts = Punctuality, att endance, and class parti cipati on 15 pts = Weekly reading responses 25 pts = Research Project: Part 1 10 pts = Mid-Term Exam25 pts = Research Project: Part 215 pts = Final Exam

100 TOTAL POINTS

A = 92 - 100, Excepti onal performance; strongly exceeding the requirements of the course, showing strong academic initi ati ve and independent resourcefulness.

B = 85 - 91, Performance above the norm; accurate, complete, and beyond the minimum requirements of the course; work demonstrates marked progress and initi ati ve.

C = 76 - 84 (Minimum grade required for professional degree credit)Sati sfactory/adequate work; adequately meets minimum requirements and demonstrates sati sfactory comprehension, communicati on skills, and eff ort; demonstrates litt le initi ati ve to investi gate the problem without substanti al prodding of the instructor; work shows litt le improvement.

D = 68 - 75, Unsati sfactory/ inferior work; unsati sfactorily meets minimum requirements and demonstrates minimum comprehension, communicati on skills, and eff ort, at an inferior level; initi ati ve lacking; improvement not noti ceable.

F = 00 - 67, Does not meet minimum requirements; fails to adequately demonstrate comprehension or communicati on skills. No pluses or minuses will be given in this course.

All work done in this class will combine concise criti cal writi ng with visualizati on techniques (drawings, diagrams, models, images, etc) and verbal presentati ons. The objecti ve of the assignments will be to demonstrate a clear and intelligent understanding of the relati onships between informati on and graphic visualizati on. These objecti ves will be evaluated through weekly reading responses, a two part research project, a visual essay midterm exam, and class discussions.

The semester will be divided into three categories: EXPLORATION, INTEGRATION, EXECUTION. Each secti on of the course will address the development of design and building workfl ows within the framework of building informati on technologies.

1. EXPLORATION will engage the role and use of digital technologies within the design process across a variety of architectural practi ces and projects. This secti on of the course will provide the fi rst method through which to analyze the impact of creati ng sophisti cated and intelligent workfl ows across multi ple scales.

2. INTEGRATION will examine the scope of collaborati on and implicati ons resulti ng from design explorati ons. This secti on will provide a framework through which to understand the integrati on of multi -disciplinary teams within the design and building industry.

3. EXECUTION will focus on the ability to document and execute the complexiti es engaged through design explorati on and integrati on into an intelligent comprehensive building process.

Class ti me throughout the semester will be divided as follows:

A. LECTURES / DISCUSSIONS will provide the framework for understanding the implicati ons of workfl ow through which to evaluate and criti cally engage issues surrounding the use of digital technologies as part of the design and building process. Students will be expected to acti vely parti cipate in class discussions and provide criti cal insight in regards to the informati on presented.

B. TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS will expand on the ideas presented in lectures by showcasing the applicati on of digital tools through the introducti on of various soft ware used as part of BIT and BIM. The primary soft ware explored in this course will be Autodesk Revit 2014. Below is a preliminary list of digital tools which will be discussed in this course.Autodesk: Revit, Vault, Navisworks, Vasari, Ecotect, Autocad, 3DS Max, 360 Cloud Rhinoceros: Grasshopper, Paneling Tools, Diva / Digital Project & CATIA / Bentley / Tekla / Microsoft Excel

C. COLLABORATION SESSIONS will consist of discussions about readings as well as preparati on for student research projects and presentati ons. Collaborati on sessions will be held at presentati on space in Depuy.

ARCH 421 | pg 10IMAGE | Syllabus, Page 02

COURSE ORGANIZATION

1. EXPLORATION will engage the role and use of digital technologies within the design process across a variety of architectural practi ces and projects. This secti on of the course will provide the fi rst method through which to analyze the impact of creati ng sophisti cated and intelligent workfl ows across multi ple scales.

2. INTEGRATION will examine the scope of collaborati on and implicati ons resulti ng from design explorati ons. This secti on will provide a framework through which to understand the integrati on of multi -disciplinary teams within the design and building industry.

3. EXECUTION will focus on the ability to document and execute the complexiti es engaged through design explorati on and integrati on into an intelligent comprehensive building process.

ARCH 421 | pg 11IMAGE | Syllabus: Course Organizati on

COURSE ORGANIZATION

A. LECTURES will provide the framework for understanding the implicati ons of workfl ow through which to evaluate and criti cally engage issues surrounding the use of digital technologies as part of the design and building process. Students will be expected to acti vely parti cipate in class discussions and provide criti cal insight in regards to the informati on presented.

B. TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS will expand on the ideas presented in lectures by showcasing the applicati on of digital tools through the introducti on of various soft ware used as part of BIT and BIM. Below is a preliminary list of the soft ware packages that will be included in this course: Autodesk: Revit, Vault, Navisworks, Vasari, Ecotect, Autocad, 3DS Max, 360 Cloud Rhinoceros: Grasshopper, Paneling Tools, Diva / Digital Project & CATIA / Bentley / Tekla / Microsoft Excel

C. COLLABORATION SESSIONS will consist of discussions about course readings and preparati on for student research projects and presentati ons.

ARCH 421 | pg 12IMAGE | Syllabus: Course Organizati on

PG 03 | FALL 2014 | ARCH 421 | BUILDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES: COLLABORATIVE DESIGN WORKFLOWS | GARCIA LAMMERS

SCHEDULE This is a preliminary outline and is subject to change. Changes will be announced in class and posted online.

WEEK 1 w: AUG. 27 COURSE INTRODUCTION NO readings / assignments

WEEK 2 w: SEPT. 3 LECTURE + DISCUSSION Reading 1 / DUE: Response 1

SEPT. 4 LAST DAY TO DROP AND/OR ADJUST FINAL FEES

WEEK 3 w: SEPT. 10 LECTURE + DISCUSSION Reading 2 / DUE: Response 2 Handout Research Project: Part 1

WEEK 4 w: SEPT. 17 TECHNICAL PRESENTATION Reading 3 / DUE: Response 3

WEEK 5 w: SEPT. 24 LECTURE + COLLABORATION SESSION DUE: Research Project Part 1progress review

WEEK 6 w: OCT. 1 RESEARCH PROJECT: PART 1 DUE: Research Project Part 1

WEEK 7 w: OCT. 8 TECHNICAL PRESENTATION Reading 4 / DUE: Response 4

WEEK 8 w: OCT. 15 MID-TERM ESSAY EXAM NO readings / assignments Handout Research Project: Part 2

WEEK 9 w: OCT. 22 LECTURE + DISCUSSION Reading 5 / DUE: Response 5

WEEK 10 w: OCT. 29 LECTURE + DISCUSSION Reading 6 / DUE: Response 6

WEEK 11 w: NOV. 5 TECHNICAL PRESENTATION Reading 7 / DUE: Response 7DUE: Research Project Part 2progress review

NOV. 7 LAST DAY TO DROP COURSE

WEEK 12 w: NOV. 12 LECTURE + DISCUSSION Reading 8 / DUE: Response 8

WEEK 13 w: NOV. 19 RESEARCH PROJECT PART 2 DUE: Research Project Part 2

WEEK 14 w: NOV. 26 NO CLASS: THANKSGIVING BREAK

WEEK 15 w: DEC. 3 LECTURE + FINAL PREP DUE: Workfl ow Documentati on

WEEK 16 w: DEC. 10 NO CLASS: FINALS WEEK

WEEK 17 w: TBD FINAL EXAM

ARCH 421 | pg 13IMAGE | Syllabus, Page 02

ASSESSMENT METHODS

All work done in this class will combine concise criti cal writi ng with visualizati on techniques (drawings, diagrams, models, images, etc) and verbal presentati ons. The objecti ve of the assignments will be to demonstrate a clear and intelligent understanding of the relati onships between informati on and graphic visualizati on.

WEEKLY READING RESPONSESRESEARCH PROJECT (PART 1 & 2)MIDTERM EXAMFINAL EXAMCLASS PARTICIPATION

ARCH 421 | pg 14IMAGE | Syllabus: Assessment Methods

ASSESSMENT METHODS

All work done in this class will combine concise criti cal writi ng with visualizati on techniques (drawings, diagrams, models, images, etc) and verbal presentati ons. The objecti ve of the assignments will be to demonstrate a clear and intelligent understanding of the relati onships between informati on and graphic visualizati on.

WEEKLY READING RESPONSES

A short writt en/visual response for each week’s reading will be required. Upload PDF responses to D2L dropbox. File size NOT to exceed 1MB. A reading response template is located on the class website. Students MUST use this template.Required readings will be posted weekly on the class website. htt p://sdsuarch421.wordpress.com

RESEARCH PROJECTVISUAL ESSAY MIDTERM EXAMFINAL EXAMCLASS PARTICIPATION.

ARCH 421 | pg 15IMAGE | Syllabus: Assessment Methods

Image Source: Insert image source and/or copyright (website, publication, etc).

Student Name: Insert student name (Last name, First Name / ex: Smith, Juana)Reading: Insert reading title as it appears on course website description

Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum. Reading response 250 words maximum.

INSERT READING 0# BUILDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES | ARCH 421 | FALL 2014 COLLABORATIVE DESIGN WORKFLOWS

Federico Garcia Lammers, Assoc. AIA | Assistant Professor | DoArch | South Dakota State University

READING RESPONSE

INSERT IMAGE: 7.5” x 5.0”, 150 DPI MINIMUM RESOLUTION

ARCH 421 | pg 16IMAGE | Weekly reading response template

READING 1

Bernstein, Philip. Building in the Future. Models for Practi ce: Past, Present, Future. COURSE WEBSITE: htt p://sdsuarch421.wordpress.com

ARCH 421 | pg 17IMAGE | READING 1

WHO OWNS THE FISH?

ARCH 421 | pg 18IMAGE | Who owns the fi sh?

EINSTEIN’S RIDDLE

The Situati on1. There are 5 houses in fi ve diff erent colors.2. In each house lives a person with a diff erent nati onality.3. These fi ve owners drink a certain type of beverage, smoke a certain brand of cigar and keep a certain pet.4. No owners have the same pet, smoke the same brand of cigar or drink the same beverage.

The questi on is: Who owns the fi sh?

Hints

• the Brit lives in the red house• the Swede keeps dogs as pets• the Dane drinks tea• the green house is on the left of the white house• the green house’s owner drinks coff ee• the person who smokes Pall Mall rears birds• the owner of the yellow house smokes Dunhill• the man living in the center house drinks milk• the Norwegian lives in the fi rst house• the man who smokes blends lives next to the one who keeps cats• the man who keeps horses lives next to the man who smokes Dunhill• the owner who smokes BlueMaster drinks beer• the German smokes Prince• the Norwegian lives next to the blue house• the man who smokes blend has a neighbor who drinks water

ARCH 421 | pg 19IMAGE | Eistein’s Riddle

House 1: Yellow, Norwegian, Water, Dunhill, Cats House 2: Blue, Danish, Tea, Blends, Horses House 3: Red, British, Milk, Pall Mall, Birds

House 4: Green, German, Coffee, Prince, FISH House 5: White, Swedish, Beer, Blue Master, Dogs

ARCH 421 | pg 20IMAGE | Eistein’s Riddle