breast ultrasound: benign vs. malignant lesions
TRANSCRIPT
Breast Ultrasound: Benign vs. Malignant Lesions
Jill Jill SteinkelerSteinkeler, Tufts University , Tufts University School of Medicine IVSchool of Medicine IV
Gillian Lieberman, MDGillian Lieberman, MD
October 25-November 19, 2004Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Breast Anatomy
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Case Presentation-Patient 1
62 year old woman with a normal mammogram in 2/04 who presents with a two week history of focal left breast pain and an associated palpable nodule just inferior to the nipple of the left breast.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
The patient underwent a unilateral digital The patient underwent a unilateral digital diagnostic mammogram for diagnostic mammogram for evaluationevaluation……
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Unilateral Left Diagnostic Mammogram
Left CC Left MLO
PACS, BIDMC
IllIll--defined density defined density in middle inferior in middle inferior
left breastleft breast
PACS, BIDMC
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
A closer look at the density on LCC view
PACS, BIDMC
Note Note spiculatedspiculated irregular marginsirregular margins
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Mammographic Findings
Heterogeneously dense parenchymaHeterogeneously dense parenchyma
1.2 cm focally prominent ill1.2 cm focally prominent ill--defined density defined density in the lower middle left breast that had in the lower middle left breast that had increased in size from the prior examination increased in size from the prior examination 2/042/04
No architectural distortion or clustered No architectural distortion or clustered microcalcificationsmicrocalcifications
BIRADS 4BIRADS 4--suspicioussuspicious
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Given these suspicious Given these suspicious mammographic findings, the mammographic findings, the patient was referred for further patient was referred for further evaluation with a unilateral breast evaluation with a unilateral breast ultrasoundultrasound……
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Indications for Breast Ultrasound
Differentiation of both palpable and Differentiation of both palpable and mammographic lesions as either cystic or solidmammographic lesions as either cystic or solid
Subsequent characterization and classification of Subsequent characterization and classification of solid nodules according to certain solid nodules according to certain sonographicsonographic featuresfeatures
Evaluation of palpable breast mass in patient Evaluation of palpable breast mass in patient younger than age 30younger than age 30
Interventional procedures (FNA, CNB)Interventional procedures (FNA, CNB)Smith, DS. Radiologic clinics of North America 2001; 39:485-496.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Left Breast Ultrasound-Patient 1
PACS, BIDMC
SkinSkin--thin thin echogenicechogenic lineline
FatFatMixed Mixed echogenicityechogenicity
of breast of breast parenchymaparenchyma
PectoralisPectoralis fasciafascia-- thin thin echogenicechogenic
lineline
HypoechogenicHypoechogenic lesionlesion
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Left Breast Ultrasound with Power Doppler-Patient 1
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Peripheral Peripheral vascularityvascularity
PACS, BIDMC
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
A brief word on Power Doppler
Measures amplitude of blood flow rather Measures amplitude of blood flow rather than direction or velocity as in color than direction or velocity as in color dopplerdoppler
The pattern of The pattern of vascularityvascularity of a breast lesion of a breast lesion on ultrasound may help to predict the on ultrasound may help to predict the likelihood of malignancy when used with likelihood of malignancy when used with other other sonographicsonographic criteriacriteria
RazaRaza S, Baum, JK. S, Baum, JK. RadiologyRadiology 1997; 203:1641997; 203:164--168. 168.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Power Doppler
A study by A study by RazaRaza and Baum assigned patterns of and Baum assigned patterns of vascularityvascularity of power of power dopplerdoppler for a series of 86 breast for a series of 86 breast lesions on ultrasoundlesions on ultrasound
Patterns included peripheral and penetrating Patterns included peripheral and penetrating vascularityvascularity, or , or no no vascularityvascularity
These breast lesions were subsequently biopsiedThese breast lesions were subsequently biopsied
They found that 68% of biopsyThey found that 68% of biopsy--proven breast cancers in proven breast cancers in this study showed penetrating pattern of this study showed penetrating pattern of vascularityvascularity on on breast ultrasound (sensitivity 68%, specificity 95%)breast ultrasound (sensitivity 68%, specificity 95%)
They concluded that the pattern of They concluded that the pattern of vascularityvascularity of breast of breast lesions should be considered with other lesions should be considered with other sonographicsonographic characteristics to help predict the possibility of malignancycharacteristics to help predict the possibility of malignancy
RazaRaza S, Baum, JK. S, Baum, JK. RadiologyRadiology 1997; 203:1641997; 203:164--168.168.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Patient 2-An Example of Penetrating vascularity on power doppler imaging in lesion later found to be invasive ductal carcinoma
PACS, BIDMC
Note Note penetrating penetrating vascularityvascularity
within lesionwithin lesion
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Now back to Patient 1, Left Breast Ultrasound
PACS, BIDMC
SkinSkin
FatFatMixed Mixed echogenicityechogenicity
of breast of breast parenchymaparenchyma
PectoralisPectoralis fasciafascia
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Left Breast Ultrasound Results
HypoechoicHypoechoic lesion in the area of palpable lesion in the area of palpable abnormality, measures 1.1x1.1x0.9cmabnormality, measures 1.1x1.1x0.9cm
MacrolobulatedMacrolobulated with some with some microlobulationmicrolobulation, , incompletely circumscribedincompletely circumscribed
Increased through transmissionIncreased through transmission
Increased peripheral Increased peripheral vascularityvascularity on power on power dopplerdoppler imagingimaging
Angular marginsAngular margins
Taller than wide in areasTaller than wide in areas
BIRADS 4BIRADS 4--suspicioussuspicious
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
PACS, BIDMC
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
How can we interpret these ultrasound findings?
How will our interpretation help to guide further management?
Two Key Questions
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
A differential diagnosis of A differential diagnosis of hypoechoichypoechoic breast lesions on breast lesions on ultrasound will be helpfulultrasound will be helpful……
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Differential Diagnosis of Hypoechoic Breast Lesions on Ultrasound
FibroadenomaFibroadenoma
CarcinomaCarcinoma
AbscessAbscess
CystCyst
Fibrocystic changesFibrocystic changes
IntramammaryIntramammary lymph nodelymph node
IntraductalIntraductal papillomapapilloma
Sebaceous cystSebaceous cystReeder, MM. Gamuts in Radiology, 4th edition. 2003.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
What is the next step?
Next we will need a method of classifying Next we will need a method of classifying lesions on breast ultrasound. Using this lesions on breast ultrasound. Using this classification it will be possible to make classification it will be possible to make further decisions about patient further decisions about patient managementmanagement……
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Landmark study by Stavros, et al
Benign Indeterminate Malignant
Prospectively classified 750 breast nodules sonographically
Stavros, et al. Stavros, et al. Radiology 1995; 196:123Radiology 1995; 196:123--134.134.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Purpose of the Stavros study
Distinguish benign solid breast nodules Distinguish benign solid breast nodules from indeterminate or malignant nodulesfrom indeterminate or malignant nodules
Use this classification as a model to either Use this classification as a model to either recommend followrecommend follow--up imaging for benign up imaging for benign appearing nodules or biopsy for both appearing nodules or biopsy for both indeterminate and malignant appearing indeterminate and malignant appearing nodulesnodules
Stavros, et al. Stavros, et al. Radiology 1995; 196:123Radiology 1995; 196:123--134.134.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Methods: Identification of Malignant Features
First, they identified lesions with any of the following First, they identified lesions with any of the following malignant features:malignant features:
SpiculationSpiculation
Angular marginsAngular margins
HypoechogenicityHypoechogenicity
ShadowingShadowing
CalcificationCalcification
Duct extensionDuct extension
Branch patternBranch pattern
MicrolobulationMicrolobulation
Stavros, et al. Stavros, et al. Radiology 1995; 196:123Radiology 1995; 196:123--134.134.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
If a single malignant feature was present on breast ultrasound, the nodule was excluded from the benign classification…
Stavros, et al. Stavros, et al. Radiology 1995; 196:123Radiology 1995; 196:123--134.134.
Methods:
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Patient 3-Example of two breast nodules with malignant features on ultrasound
Angular Angular marginsmargins
SpiculationsSpiculations
MicrolobulationsMicrolobulations
HypoechoicHypoechoic
PACS, BIDMC
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Patient 4-Example of breast nodule with malignant features on ultrasound
PACS, BIDMC
Posterior Posterior acoustic acoustic
shadowingshadowing
Internal Internal CalcificationCalcification
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Classification of Lesions as Benign in the Stavros study
Intense and uniformhyperechogenicity
Ellipsoid shape andthin echogenic capsule
2 or 3 gentle lobulationsthin echogenic capsule
Benign lesions
Stavros, et al. Stavros, et al. Radiology 1995; 196:123Radiology 1995; 196:123--134.134.
Methods: Next they classified lesions as benign if they fit into any of 3 classifications
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Patient 5-Example of benign fibroadenoma on ultrasound
Smith, DS. Smith, DS. Radiologic clinics of North AmericaRadiologic clinics of North America May 2001; 39(3)May 2001; 39(3)
Thin Thin echogenicechogenic
capsulecapsule
Ellipsoid Ellipsoid shapeshape
(wider than (wider than tall)tall)
Most common Most common benign solid benign solid mass of the mass of the breastbreast
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Patient 6-Example of simple cyst on breast ultrasound
PACS, BIDMC
AnechoicAnechoic
Smooth Smooth marginsmargins
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
A lesion was classified as indeterminate if it had no malignant features, yet it did not fit any of the benign combinations.
Stavros, et al. Stavros, et al. Radiology 1995; 196:123Radiology 1995; 196:123--134.134.
Methods:
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Results of the Stavros studyAll of the breast nodules were subsequently All of the breast nodules were subsequently
biopsied.biopsied.The The sonographicsonographic classification for each classification for each
nodule was then compared with the final nodule was then compared with the final biopsy results.biopsy results.
Stavros, et al. Stavros, et al. Radiology 1995; 196:123Radiology 1995; 196:123--134.134.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Results of the Stavros study cont’d
424 benign histology2 malignant histology
426 benign on US
123 malignant histology201 benign histology
324 indeterminateor malignant on US
750 Breast nodules
Stavros, et al. Stavros, et al. Radiology 1995; 196:123Radiology 1995; 196:123--134.134.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Sensitivity of breast ultrasound 98.4% (123 Sensitivity of breast ultrasound 98.4% (123 out of 125 malignant lesions were correctly out of 125 malignant lesions were correctly classified as indeterminate or malignant)classified as indeterminate or malignant)
Negative predictive value of 99.5% (2 Negative predictive value of 99.5% (2 lesions out of 426 classified as benign on lesions out of 426 classified as benign on US showed malignant histologyUS showed malignant histology
Results of the Stavros study cont’d
Stavros, et al. Stavros, et al. Radiology 1995; 196:123Radiology 1995; 196:123--134.134.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Conclusions of study:Given the results of the Stavros study and Given the results of the Stavros study and
both the high sensitivity and negative both the high sensitivity and negative predictive value, predictive value, sonographysonography can be used to can be used to accurately classify some solid lesions as accurately classify some solid lesions as benign. This classification permits imaging benign. This classification permits imaging followfollow--up rather than biopsy for benign up rather than biopsy for benign lesions on ultrasound.lesions on ultrasound.
Stavros, et al. Stavros, et al. Radiology 1995; 196:123Radiology 1995; 196:123--134.134.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Given the suspicious findings on our patient’s ultrasound and multiple malignant features, she was referred for an ultrasound guided core needle biopsy…
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Core Needle Biopsy revealed Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma
PACS, BIDMC
Biopsy Biopsy needle needle
traversing traversing lesionlesion
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
Conclusions
Breast ultrasound not only helps in differentiating cystic Breast ultrasound not only helps in differentiating cystic from solid lesions, but also plays an important role in from solid lesions, but also plays an important role in characterizing solid nodules.characterizing solid nodules.
SonographicSonographic features suggestive of malignancy include features suggestive of malignancy include spiculationsspiculations, , hypoechogenicityhypoechogenicity, , microlobulationsmicrolobulations, internal , internal calcifications, shadowing, taller than wide, angular calcifications, shadowing, taller than wide, angular margins among othersmargins among others
SonographicSonographic features suggestive of benignity include features suggestive of benignity include smooth margins, thin smooth margins, thin echogenicechogenic capsule, ellipsoid shape, capsule, ellipsoid shape, macrolobulationsmacrolobulations, , hyperechogenicityhyperechogenicity
The ability to characterize lesions on breast ultrasound The ability to characterize lesions on breast ultrasound helps to determine the next step in patient carehelps to determine the next step in patient care
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
References
RahbarRahbar G, G, SieSie AC, Hansen GC, Prince JS, AC, Hansen GC, Prince JS, MelanyMelany ML, Reynolds HE, ML, Reynolds HE, Jackson VP, Sayre JW, Bassett LW. Benign versus malignant solid Jackson VP, Sayre JW, Bassett LW. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. breast masses: US differentiation. RadiologyRadiology 1999; 213:8891999; 213:889--894.894.
RazaRaza, S, Baum JK. Solid breast lesions: Evaluation with power , S, Baum JK. Solid breast lesions: Evaluation with power dopplerdoppler US. US. RadiologyRadiology 1997; 203:1641997; 203:164--168.168.
Reeder, MM. Reeder and Reeder, MM. Reeder and FelsonFelson’’ss GamutsGamuts in Radiology, 4in Radiology, 4thth edition. edition. 2003. 2003.
Smith, DN. Breast ultrasound. Smith, DN. Breast ultrasound. Radiologic clinics of North AmericaRadiologic clinics of North America 2001; 39:4852001; 39:485--496.496.
Stavros TA, Stavros TA, ThickmanThickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, SisneySisney GA. Solid Breast Nodules: Use of GA. Solid Breast Nodules: Use of sonographysonography to distinguish between to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. benign and malignant lesions. Radiology Radiology 1995; 196:1231995; 196:123--134.134.
Jill Steinkeler, IV
Gillian Lieberman, MD
AcknowledgementsA special thank you to Larry A special thank you to Larry BarbarasBarbaras, Dr. , Dr.
Gillian Lieberman, Pamela Gillian Lieberman, Pamela LepkowskiLepkowski, , Dr. Carla Dr. Carla RothausRothaus, Dr. Phyllis , Dr. Phyllis KornguthKornguth, ,
Dr. Janet Baum, Dr. Dr. Janet Baum, Dr. TejasTejas Mehta, Mehta, and Dr. Ferris Hall.and Dr. Ferris Hall.