brain implant victims - mcrais

Upload: projekt-stop-torture

Post on 06-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS

    1/11

    Brain Implant Victims[Note:1]

    Excerpts:

    Psychic Dictatorship in the U.S.A.

    Alex ConstantinePortland, OR: Feral House, 1995

    []

    The moral squalor of the governments RF mind-control program cried outfor oversight, as one case history from the Los Angeles Herald [Note:2] makes clear:

    A Suit Over Brain Surgery Man Hallucinates, Says Microwaves are Murdering Him

    The subject was Leonard Kille, a talented electronics engineer. Kille was the

    holder of patents for inventions willed to MIT when his brain was disabled by CIApsychiatrists Vernon Mark of Boston City Hospital and UCLAs Frank Ervin.

    Kille was a co-inventor of the Land camera, named for Edwin Land of thePolaroid Corporation, an old boy of the CIAs mind-control program. It was Land,in fact, who founded the Scientific Engineering Institute on behalf of the CIA. (TheSEI appeared earlier in this account hosting a course on demonology and witchcraftat the University of South Carolina, and planting electrodes in the brains of humansubjects.) Lands CIA clique of behaviorists apparently drew their moralinspiration from the Deaths Head Order of the Waffen SS. At South Vietnams BienHoa Hospital, for example, an SEI team buried electrodes in the skulls of VietcongPOWs and attempted to spur them into violence by remote control. Uponcompletion of the experiments, the POWs were shot and cremated by a company of Americas best, the Green Berets.

    Killes story is no less lurid. In 1966 he suspected that his wife was having anaffair. She denied it. He didnt believe her and flew into rages. A psychiatristinterpreted his anger as a personality pattern disturbance, and referred him toMark and Ervin for neurological tests. They diagnosed him a mild psychomotorepileptic, and his jealousy was obviously paranoia. (As it happens, his wife wascarrying on an affair with a boarder.) His psychiatrists described Kille asuncontrolled, dangerous. (In fact, Killes most violent outburst consisted of throwing tin cans at his wifehe missed her.) Kille was hospitalized and pressuredinto brain surgery. He refused at first, but his wife threatened divorce if he didntsubmit to his psychiatrists. The cruel irony was that she divorced him after thesurgery anyway to marry her paramour.

    In the operating room, four electrical strands running the length of his brainwere implanted. Each strand was studded with 20 or so electrodes. It was only after surgery that Kille was asked to sign his consent with the strands in place, alreadyzinging his brain.

    Internal EEG activity was recorded. The voltage of the stimoceivers wasboosted as part of Killes treatment.

    Dr. Peter Breggin of the Center to Study Psychiatry, a rare ombudsman of psychiatric abuses, investigated the case and found despite the glowing reports of Mark and Ervin that the patient was totally disabled, chronically hospitalized, andsubject to nightmarish terrors that he will be caught and operated on again at theMassachusetts General Hospital.

    Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants

    1 von 11 16.07.2011 12:49

    http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implantshttp://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants
  • 8/3/2019 Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS

    2/11

    Home

    Library

    Mind Control

    Hypnosis Comes of Age

    The People Shapers

    Operation Mind Control

    The Mind Stealers

    The Search for theManchurian Candidate

    Such Things Are Known

    The Battle for Your Mind

    Brainwash ExperimentsStill Enrage Victim's Son

    The Controllers

    Journey Into Madness

    Mind-Control Projects

    Remote-Controlled Man

    Canada Settles withBrainwash Victims

    Microwave Harassment &Mind-ControlExperimentation

    U.S. Explores RussianMind-Control Technology

    Hearing Voices

    Free Thinking Newsletter

    Brain Transmitters

    Secret, Dont Tell

    UAlbany SuspendsImplants Research

    BLUEBIRD: DeliberateCreation of MultiplePersonality byPsychiatrists

    Brain Implant Victims

    The Secrets of MindControl

    Multimedia(Broadband)

    Operation Mind Control pdf

    In 1971 an attendant found him with a wastebasket over his head to stopthe microwaves. A sympathetic doctor at Bostons VA hospital, where he wastransferred, ordered for him a large sheet of aluminum foil so he may fashion aprotective helmet for himself. Good luck. The VA doctors were not informed thatKille had been fitted with the electrode strands, and wrote him off as a delusionalparanoiac.

    The Mass General and labs... (are) killing all the useful cells in my brain,he confided in a note to a VA doctor when the electrodes burned lesions into hisamygdala, another treatment. It left him permanently paralyzed from the waistdown.

    Sweet and Ervin controlled his moods with electronic stimulation. Theyturned him up and turned him down, he said. The haunting fear left by Killesordeal, a psychiatrist wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine , is that menmay become slaves, perhaps to an authoritarian state. []

    X-ray shows two deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodesimplanted on each side of a patients brain. Frontal view of eye sockets to top of skull. Above example is similar tosome implants that have existed since the 1950s. Image from Brain Implant Offers Hope for Severely Depressed,Michelle Trudeau, NeuroPsychiatric Reviews , May 2, 2005.

    Intracerebral Radio Stimulationand Recording in

    Completely Free Patients

    Jos M. R. Delgado, M.D.The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease , Vol. 147, No. 4, 1968

    []

    METHODS

    Implantation of Electrodes

    Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants

    2 von 11 16.07.2011 12:49

    http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implantshttp://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants
  • 8/3/2019 Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS

    3/11

    Electrodes were constructed and stereotaxically implanted according tomethods previously described (Mark & Ervin, 1969). The electrode assemblies,which were connected to a McPherson skull plug, consisted of a plastic styled,1.2mm in diameter, with 15 stainless steel 3mm wide contacts attached at 3mmintervals, plus one thermistor and three other contacts at the tip. Using a McPhersonType 2 stereotaxic machine (Mark & Ervin, 1969), electrode assemblies wereimplanted bilaterally into the anterior medial amygdala of each patient. []

    Stimoceiver

    The integration of the three-channel units for radio stimulation and EEGtelemetry constitutes the stimoceiver ( stimulator and EEG receiver ). []

    Figure 1 Two patients instrumented for intracerebral radiostimulation and recording engage in spontaneous activities (one is

    playing the guitar) in the psychiatric ward in the presence of thedoctor (VM). Explorations of the brain can be performed for aslong as necessary without disturbing the patients. []

    Clinical Applications of the Stimoceiver

    1. L. K. This 35-year-old white male design engineer had experiencedattacks of staring and automatisms for 10 to 12 years. []

    2. M. R. This 25-year-old white male suffered from encephalitis as an infantand a severe head injury in the Navy. [...]

    3. J. P. This 20-year-old white female had a history of encephalitis at the ageof 18 months. [...]

    4. G. C. This 14-year-old Negro girl was brought up in a foster home and wasof borderline intelligence. [...]

    Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants

    3 von 11 16.07.2011 12:49

    http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implantshttp://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants
  • 8/3/2019 Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS

    4/11

  • 8/3/2019 Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS

    5/11

    Figure III X-ray of an unidentified patient with brainimplants similar to Julias. Lateral view from lower jaw totop of skull. Large parts of the devices and surroundingwires are located at back of skull with electrodes extendedforward to areas deep in the brain.

    Figure IV Telemetered EEG tracings taken in Julia. Remotely recorded brain waves from three points inside herbrain and simultaneous with remote-controlled electriccurrent from the implants stimulating her brain.

    Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants

    5 von 11 16.07.2011 12:49

    http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implantshttp://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants
  • 8/3/2019 Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS

    6/11

    Figure V Julia attacking wall after stimulation. Attack against the wall was both sudden and unexpected. Remote-controlled electrical current from the implants affected herbrain and behavior.

    Figure VI Telemetered EEG tracings taken in Julia. Remotely recorded brain waves from three areas down inher brain and simultaneous with her actions in Figure V.

    In addition, we were able to use the stimoceiverthesame telemetered device used to send signals and receiveinformation from orbiting astronauts. Attaching thestimoceiver to implanted electrodes makes it possible torecord or stimulate points deep within the brain touchingthe electrodes, from a distance without the use of

    connecting wires; and because the patient is unrestricted,this stimulation and recording can be carried out over a longperiod of time. Images and quote from Violence and the Brain , Vernon H. Mark, M.D.and Frank R. Ervin, M.D., New York: Harper and Row, 1970.

    Campaigns Against Racist Federal Programsby the Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology

    Peter R. Breggin, M.D. Journal of African American Men, 1:No. 3, 3-22. Winter 1995/96

    Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants

    6 von 11 16.07.2011 12:49

    http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implantshttp://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants
  • 8/3/2019 Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS

    7/11

    [] The Fate of Thomas R.

    In their book, Violence and the Brain (1970), and elsewhere, Mark andErvin described Thomas R. (sometimes called Leonard K.) as a young white man

    largely saved from epilepsy and completely saved from violence by psychosurgery.When describing his outcome, they mention no serious side effects. He was theirstar patient.

    The patients mother, Mrs. G., read my criticism of Mark and Ervin in the Boston Globe and realized for the first time what had been done to her son. Shewrote to me that in reality he had been reduced almost to a vegetable. Thomasstragic story is retold in detail in Breggin and Breggin, The War Against Children .

    Mark and Ervin Lose Their Funding

    As a result of the anti-psychosurgery campaign, all of Mark, Ervin andSweets federal funding for genetic and psychosurgical experimentation was cut off.As a long-delayed satisfaction to us, we learned this year that the Centers campaignagainst the DOJs Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) funding forErvin had brought about a dramatic reversal in official government policy. Aguideline entitled Use of LEAA funds for Psychosurgery and Medical Researchwas signed by the LEAA administrator, Donald E. Santarelli, on June 19, 1974. Theguideline declared that any future grant applications for psychosurgery would bedenied. It further stipulated that all medical research, unless risk-free, would bedenied and referred instead to the Department of Health, Education and Welfare(DHEW, now DHHS). It forbid states to use LEAA block grants to dopsychosurgery or medical experimentation.

    Operating on Little Black Children

    As far as we know, Mark and Ervin did not perform their psychosurgeryexperiments on any African Americans. With more limited political aims, perhaps,another surgeon was operating on numerous black children. When I beganresearching the return of psychosurgery in the early 1970s, I quickly came upon thework of O. J. Andy, Director of Neurosurgery at the University of MississippiOleMissin Jackson. He was publishing reports on multiple surgical interventions intothe brains of small children, ages five to twelve, who were diagnosed as aggressiveand hyperactive. Of his 30-40 patients, he wrote me in 1971, most were children.

    Before the controversy hit the press, I phoned Andy, who told me he couldnot recall the race of any of the children. Later I contacted a civil rights attorney inMississippi who was able to determine that most of them were housed in asegregated black institution for the developmentally disabled. The attorney got ontothe wards, where the nurses told him with frustration that Andy had a completelyfree hand in picking children for psychosurgery.

    In 1966 Andy described J. M., age nine, who was hyperactive, aggressive,combative, explosive, destructive, sadistic. Over a three-year period Andyperformed four separate mutilating operations involving at least six lesions withimplanted electrodes. The youngster was at first said to be doing well. In asubsequent 1970 article, Andy again claimed that J. M. is no longer so combativeand negative. Then he added, Intellectually, however, the patient is deteriorating.

    While Andy did not take an activist political position like Mark, Ervin, andSweethe did tell B. J. Mason, a reporter for Ebony , that black urban rioters couldhave abnormal pathologic brains and should undergo tests with whatever capacitywe have now. Following world-wide publicity about his operations during theanti-psychosurgery campaign, in 1973 a committee of his peers at the universitydeclared his research experimental. When Andy did not establish appropriateexperimental protocols, he was prohibited from operating. Andy himself declared in1980 that he had been forced to stop operating due to sociological pressures in his

    Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants

    7 von 11 16.07.2011 12:49

    http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implantshttp://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants
  • 8/3/2019 Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS

    8/11

    home community.

    Violence Centers Throughout Urban America

    In his 1973 State of the State message, California governor Ronald Reaganannounced plans for the establishment of a biomedical facility, the Center for theStudy of the Reduction of Violence. Supported by state and federal funds, the first

    center was planned for the psychiatry department at UCLA, headed by Louis JolyonJolly West, a flamboyant psychiatrist known for his ability to hitch himself to hottopics. An early draft of Wests proposed UCLA center described using schools inChicano and African American neighborhoods to screen for possible genetic defects.It also mentioned the possibility of psychosurgery. The suggestion of psychosurgeryfor control of violence was especially menacing in California because Santa Monicaneurosurgeon M. H. Brown was strongly advocating it. In a January 22, 1972 letterto the Los Angeles Times , he wrote, It is either this [psychosurgery] or a furtherescalation of violence and chaos in society that does not serve the best interests of the United States.

    Meanwhile, Frank Ervin left the collapsing Boston project and came to joinWest at UCLA. Ervins arrival at this critical juncture alerted people to the centers

    potential dangers. Despite denials from psychiatrists West and Ervin, the discoveryof references to genetics and psychosurgery in the original proposal provedpolitically fatal. Opposed by the Center and a coalition of west coast reformers, 3 theplanned string of federal violence centers never got off the ground. [...] 3 Opposition to the violence centers was broadbased: psychologist and attorney Edward M. Opton, Jr.,psychiatrists Lee Coleman and Phil Shapiro, civil rights and womens groups, African Americanactivists , and many psychiatric survivors, including Leonard Frank and Wade Hudson.

    X-ray reveals a series of electrodes implanted in a patients brain.Graphic on right displays brainwave readings from electrodes noted bylines. Lateral view of upper jaw to top of skull. Above example iscomparable to some implants and procedures utilized since the 1950s. Images from UC Researchers Create Model of Brains Electrical Storm During aSeizure, Sarah Yang, EurekaAlert! , February 23, 2005.

    Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants

    8 von 11 16.07.2011 12:49

    http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implantshttp://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants
  • 8/3/2019 Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS

    9/11

    Cold War Guinea Pigs

    The Governments Secret ExperimentsUsing Radiation, Mind Control,

    Chemicals and Drugs on its Citizens[cover]

    The Cold War ExperimentsRadiation tests were only one small part of a vast researchprogram that used thousands of Americans as guinea pigs

    Stephen Budiansky, Erica E. Goode, and Ted Gest

    U.S. News and World Report , January 24, 1994 [...]

    Many of the stories of people whose lives were destroyed by mind-alteringdrugs, electroshock treatments and other military and CIA experiments involvingtoxic chemicals or behavior modification have been known for almost 20 years. ButU.S. News has discovered that only a handful were ever compensatedor even toldwhat was done to them. There has essentially been no legitimate follow-up, despitethe CIAs promise to track down the victims and see what happened to them, saysAlan Scheflin, a professor at Santa Clara University Law School and an authority oncold war mind-control research. Its just one of the many broken promises. A CIAspokesman last week said the agency is searching its files for radiation tests but hasno plans to revisit other human experimentation.

    MKULTRA . Most victims have never been informed by the government of the nature of the experiments they were subjected to or, in some cases, even the factthat they were subjects. In a 1977 hearing, then CIA director Stansfield Turner saidhe found the experiments abhorrent and promised that the CIA would find andnotify the people used in the tests. Turner last week insisted that they foundeveryone they possibly could find. But internal memos and depositions taken fromCIA officials in a lawsuit against the agency in the 1980s reveal that of the hundredsof experimental subjects used in the CIAs mind-control program, code-namedMKULTRA, only 14 were ever notified and only one was compensatedfor$15,000. [...]

    In 1955, the Army supported research at Tulane University in which mentalpatients had electrodes implanted in their brains to measure the LSD and otherdrugs. In other experiments, volunteers were kept in sensory-deprivation chambersfor as long as 131 hours and bombarded with white noise and taped messages untilthey began hallucinating. The goal: to see if they could be converted to newbeliefs. [...]

    Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants

    9 von 11 16.07.2011 12:49

    http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implantshttp://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants
  • 8/3/2019 Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS

    10/11

    Brain implant is 4 mm by 4 mm with 100tiny electrodes that read neural signals.The chip transmits the signals via cableor telemetry to computers that translate

    the data. Patients with the implantsmanage emails, draw circles withsoftware, play video games, and controltelevisions using only their thoughts .Above example resembles someimplants, methods, and results reportedsince the 1960s. Image from Brain Implants for ParalysisVictims, Brian Liu, Global National , July 12,2006.

    Transdermal Stimoceiver

    If the stimulation Delgado plans to administer is electric,the shaft is an exceedingly thin steel-wire electrode coated withinsulation except at the tip. [*] Dozens of such needlelike wires maybe inserted from one opening and can be attached to the samesocket on top of the skull, or eventually inside it. ...

    Delgado has pioneered in the remote control of electricalstimulation. He began shaping the behavior of subjects while he

    was in a nearby room manning a push-button radio device. Now hecan do this from thousands of feet away.

    At first the sockets he was using to receive radio messageswere outside the scalp. Now the equipment, built under amicroscope, is the size of a coin and can be planted under the scalpand so is unnoticeable in a free-moving subject. Also, the devicenot only receives instructions but broadcasts back the subjectsreactions. Delgado calls it a transdermal stimoceiver. ... [pp. 42-43]

    With humans he and his associates have stimulated severalareas involved in motor activity. ... He caused one woman patientin his group, when she was alone in her own room, to turn her headand move her body as if she were looking for something. This was

    repeated. When she was asked what she was doing, the womanalways had a plausible explanation. Apparently, she had no ideashe was responding to the electrical stimulation of her brain. ... [p. 55]

    Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants

    10 von 11 16.07.2011 12:49

    http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implantshttp://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants
  • 8/3/2019 Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS

    11/11

    Lawrence R. Pinneo, a ... neurophysiologist ... at theStanford Research Institute, ... has proved that you can think into acomputer, and that the instructions you think can cause thecomputer to activate and move remote-control cameras and othermachines. In short, the machines obey your mental instructions.

    Pinneo started with the motor theory of thought. This holdsthat verbal thinking is nothing more than subvocal speech. With anumber of subjects he attached electrodes to the area of the scalpnear the region where speech originates. On command they were tothink of a word, such as schoolboy or start or left. They wereto repeat the word in their minds ten times. All this thinking of words was being registered by a computer. It averaged out arecognition pattern for each word. He proceeded to build up avocabulary of fifteen unspoken English words that the computercould recognize. He trained the computer to recognize actuallyspoken words (overt speech) as well as think words (covertspeech). They came out much alike in the word patterns that thecomputer stored away. ...

    In his preliminary report Pinneo stated: We conclude that itis feasible for a human verbally to communicate both overtly andcovertly with a computer using biological information [EEG] alone,with a high degree of accuracy and reliability, at least with a smallvocabulary. [] ... [p. 285] Quotes from The People Shapers , Vance Packard, Boston: Little, Brown andCompany, 1977. [*] Jos M.R. Delgado, M.D., was a neurophysiologist at the Yale UniversitySchool of Medicine.[] Lawrence R. Pinneo, Ph.D., Persistent EEG Patterns Associated with Overtand Covert Speech, Neurophysiology Program, Menlo Park, California: StanfordResearch Institute (SRI), 1975.

    [Note:1] Adapted from Leonard Kille and Documented Brain Implant Victims, Allen L. Barker, Ph.D., Bio.net , August 2004. All images and text in gray boxes added.

    [Note:2] March 21, 1979.

    Anmelden Nutzungsbedingungen Missbrauch melden Seite drucken | Powered by Google Sites

    bersetzen

    Brain Implant Victims - MCRAIS http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants

    11 11 16 07 2011 12 49

    http://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implantshttp://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/implants