borrego water district revenue workshop
DESCRIPTION
Borrego Water District Revenue Workshop. Potential Revenue Sources. Background Service Area Relatively Small Largely Undeveloped Absentee Owners Low Growth Rate Community Sensitivity to Rate Increases Most Costs Fixed and Not Directly Related to Amount of Water Sold - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Borrego Water District Revenue
Workshop
Potential Revenue Sources
Background Service Area Relatively Small Largely Undeveloped Absentee Owners Low Growth Rate Community Sensitivity to Rate Increases Most Costs Fixed and Not Directly Related to Amount
of Water Sold Benefits Flow to Current Users as Well as Future
Users
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 2
Current Situation• Basin in Overdraft• Recent Legislation SBX7-7
– Mandates a 20% reduction in urban per capita demand by 2020
• Loss of Major Customer• Funding Needs
– Adequate funds for Operation and Maintenance– System replacement– Eventual augmentation of basin supply
04/21/23 Glenn M Reiter & Associates 3
REVENUE SOURCES
04/21/23 Glenn M Reiter & Associates 4
California Water Use By Percent
04/21/23 Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 5
Bul. No. 3 1957Cal Water Plan 2005 Cal Water
Plan 2009Bul. No. 3
Bul.160-93
Bul. 160-98
California Water Use by Acre Feet
04/21/23 Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 6
Equitable Apportionment of Cost and Benefit• There Are Two Major Beneficiaries
– Current Water Users• Residential• M & I • Recreational• Agricultural
– Future Water Users• Residential• M & I• Recreational• Agricultural
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 7
Identification of Amount of Benefit to All Users
• Existing Users
– Benefit of receiving a reliable water supply
– Maintain property value
– Maintain business and income
• Vacant Property within Service Area
– Maintain property value
– Water available when needed
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 8
Identification of Costs • There are two broad categories of costs
– Operating Costs: (Day to Day Operations)• Energy• Labor • Insurance• Supplies• Equipment• Outside Services
• Non-Operating Costs: (Long Term Sustaining)– Capital Replacement (Pipe, Pumps, Wells, Tanks)– Capital Outlay (Vehicles, Tools, Computers) – Capital Improvement (System Enlargement, New Water Supplies)– Debt
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 9
Types of Cost
• Two Broad Categories– Fixed (Expense not driven by water delivered)
• Labor • Insurance• Communications• Maintenance• Equipment
– Variable (Expense driven by water delivered)• Energy• Treatment
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 10
Who Benefits From A Reliable Water Supply?
• Current Users
• Future Users
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 11
How Can Non-Users Participate?
• Parcel Charges
• Special Taxes
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 12
Parcel Charge Features
• Ability to distribute cost and benefits to all property within service area
• Stable revenue sources not dependent upon water sales
• Nexus required• Requires weighted vote of property owners• May include exemptions for non-benefiting
property
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 13
Special Tax
• Must be for specific purpose
• 2/3 of registered voters must approve
• District has approximately 1,440 registered
voters
• Does not require a Nexus since it is a tax
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 14
Cost Allocation to Non-Users
• The District experiences costs that are related to future water users
– Preservation of facilities
– Maintenance of capacity for future users
– Planning studies to address overdraft situation
– Planning studies to examine potential new water
supplies
– Labor costs associated with the above04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 15
FY 10-11 Fixed versus Variable
04/21/23 Board Workshop Slide 16Fixed Costs Variable Costs
The General Plan for Borrego Valley
Number of Units
County Plan - Build Out 16,000 dwelling units (DUs)
Existing as of March 2009 2,500 DUs
Approved 3,725 DUs
In Review - 599 DUs
In Review - Condominiums 122
Potential 9,400 DUs
Existing DUs represent 15.6% of Build Out
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 17
Land InventoryType Acres AV No. of Parcels Accounts
Improved 8,510 $400,836,460 2,157
Unimproved 23,675 $272,781,429 3,914
Water Service 2,141
Sewer Service
Totals 32,185 $673,617,889 6,071 2,141
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 18
Current Revenue Needs
• Annual Operating & Non-Operating Budget– Funded by rates and charges that provide a stable
revenue stream – Address the issue of reduced per capita consumption– Identify that portion of the Budget that is of benefit to
future users (Vacant Property)– Determine how much of the Operating Budget should
be collected from the Service Charge versus the Commodity Charge
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 19
Future Cash Needs
• Replacement of Capital Facilities
• Expansion of delivery capability
• Fund studies for the development of future
water supplies
• Examine what assets the District has that can be
turned in cash or a revenue stream
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 20
Financial Policies
• Establish minimum operating coverage of 1.2 times
Operating Expenses
• Develop emergency reserve sufficient to replace critical
system facilities after a disaster
• Set rates and charges in each service area that reflects
the cost to service that area
• Develop rates or charges for properties that benefit from
the availability of a water supply
• Fund $_??__ per Year for facility replacement in
accordance with GASBS State 3404/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 21
Water Rates• In complying with SBX7-7, need to develop rates
that will be equitable to all customers, taking
into consideration lot size
• Avoid rate shock by phasing increases over time
• Adjust rates annually to avoid large sudden rate
increases
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 22
Financial Impacts of Conservation
• Fixed Costs are not reduced
– Cost could increase implementing conservation
Programs
• Only reduction is in variable portion of Operating
Costs
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 23
Cost Per AF Based on Sales of 3,000 af
04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 24
Recommended Approach
• Determine revenue requirements for:
– Short Term 5 Years
– Possibly Long Term 20 Years?
• Study and select appropriate revenue sources
• Develop Long Range cash flow
• Distribute Costs to appropriate benefitting properties
• Develop rates
• Public education
• Proceed with Prop 218 requirements04/21/23 Board Workshop Glenn M Reiter & Associates Slide 25