boards: the famous and the infamous

54
TRANS-EUROPEAN DIVISION TREASURER SEMINAR JUNE 11-17, 2012 Boards: The Famous and the Infamous Ann Gibson, PhD, CPA Andrews University 1

Upload: alea-huff

Post on 01-Jan-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Boards: The Famous and the Infamous. Trans-European Division Treasurer Seminar June 11-17, 2012. Ann Gibson, PhD, CPA Andrews University. The Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is at the top of the organization’s governing structure. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

 TRANS-EUROPEAN DIVISION TREASURER SEMINAR

JUNE 11-17, 2012 

Boards: The Famous and the

Infamous

Ann Gibson, PhD, CPAAndrews University

1

Page 2: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

The Board of Directors

The Board of Directors is at the top of the organization’s governing structure.

In non-profit institutions, the board owns an organization….for the sake of the mission which that organization is to perform…. (Board members) own the organization because they care.

David Hubbard

2

Page 3: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Boards Behaving Badly

The Board of HealthSouth:

Well compensated; received 25,000 shares annuallyFinancial ties to Richard ScrushyMany board members were also company officersUsed loans to “enhance equity ownership”

3

Page 4: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Boards Behaving Badly

“We (directors) really don’t know a lot about what has been occurring at the company.”

HealthSouth Board Member

“We relied on the explanations of management so we were deceived as to the fraud.”

HealthSouth Audit Committee Chair

4

Page 5: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Boards Behaving Badly

“The conduct of the HealthSouth board amounted to ‘gross negligence.’”

Corporate Governance Expert

5

Page 6: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Boards Behaving Badly

The Board of the Baptist Foundation of Arizona (BFA):

Engaged in related party transactions to their own benefitAccepted phony land swaps and large loansHid information through the use of 60 shell corporations

6

Page 7: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Boards Behaving Badly

Members of the BFA board, especially the pastors and laypersons, interpreted the complex corporate shells as sophistication

And the increasing income numbers on the financial statements, even in a down real estate market, as persuasive positive evidence

7

Page 8: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Types of Boards8

The Passive Board

The Contrary and Confused Board

The Strong-minded Board

The Super, Mission-driven Board

Page 9: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Types of Boards

The Passive Board:A sleeping boardAfraid to ask questions lest they appear naïveInsider-dominated boardLikely to “rise” to protect management from criticismLikely to rush difficult issues to a voteDominated by the CEO

9

Page 10: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Types of Boards

The Contrary and Confused Board:

Unclear about the organization’s missionPlagued with conflicts of interestDirectors see personal benefit to serving on the board; may use board position to enrich themselves

10

Page 11: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Boards Behaving Badly

The Board of Enron:

Hand-picked by Ken LayWell compensated: over $380,000 each in 2001Financial ties to Ken LayConflicts of interestFailure to monitor and follow-through on decisions

11

Page 12: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Boards Behaving Badly

SDA Boards can have conflicts of interest:

Inside-directors come with their own agenda

Inter-connected relationships between church boards

12

Page 13: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Types of Boards

The Strong-minded Board:

Led by members who have their own interpretation of what is good for the organization or its community

Led by members who wish to move the organization in ways that benefit themselves and/or the charismatic leader rather than the organization

13

Page 14: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Types of Boards

Strong-minded boards often exist where professional training and judgment are critical to understanding the mission of the organization

Such boards require either the education of board members or the selection of members who already understand the mission of the organization

14

Page 15: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Boards Behaving Badly

The Board of Citigroup:

“I had no familiarity at all with CDOs (collateralized debt obligations).”

“…I am not senior management. I have this side role.”

Robert Rubin, Chairman

15

Page 16: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Boards Behaving Badly

The Board of WorldCom:

A passive board“Bernie’s Board” - Composed of Bernie’s friendsConsiderable conflicts of interestBecame millionaires by WorldCom stock holdings

16

Page 17: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Boards Behaving Badly

Rule No. 1: Don’t bet against BernieRule No. 2: See Rule No. 1

Not an active or curious board. Was not aware of major debt transactions with Bernie Ebbers

17

Page 18: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Ethics Scenario

It’s April, 2002

You are a member of WorldCom’s Board of Directors

18

Page 19: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Ethics Scenario

It’s July, 2002: WSJ headlines read:

“WorldCom Plans Bankruptcy Filing. Board Approves Move; Operations to Continue During Reorganization”

19

Page 20: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Types of Boards

The Super, Mission-driven Board:

Understands the mission of the organization

Seeks to remain true to that mission as it provides guidance to the organization

20

Page 21: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Non-Profit Organizations

Do not have owners in the traditional sense

May be responsible to many stakeholders

May be dependent on many stakeholders

May have clientele different than those who fund or govern the organization

21

Page 22: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Non-Profit Organizations

Role of the Board particularly crucial in non-profit organizations because the board is entrusted with the mission and the corporate integrity

Requires that the Board focus on the mission of the organization and embrace “systems thinking” rather than remaining “representational” for a specific constituency

22

Page 23: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

SDA Governance

Two Governance Structures:

The Governing Board

The Executive Committee

23

Page 24: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

SDA Governance

The Governing Board Model:

Stand-alone entities (e.g., institutions)Separately incorporatedOne voting board member who is an employeeChaired by an external personCEO/President accountable to the boardBoard makes limited hiring decisions

24

Page 25: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

SDA Governance

The Executive Committee Model:

Entities included in the church network (conferences, unions, divisions)UnincorporatedMany employee voting members on CommitteeChaired by an internal personAll three officers accountable to the Exec CommitteeCommittee makes many hiring decisions

25

Page 26: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Non-Profit Organizations

“To be effective, a non-profit needs a strong board, but a board that does the board’s work. The board not only helps think through the institution’s mission, it is the guardian of that mission and makes sure the organization lives up to its basic mission….

Over the door to the non-profit’s boardroom there should be an inscription in big letters that says:

26

Page 27: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Non-Profit Organizations

MEMBERSHIP ON THIS BOARD IS NOT POWER;

IT IS RESPONSIBILITY.”

Peter Drucker

Managing the Non-Profit Organization

27

Page 28: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Non-Profit Organizations

The governing board has power:

Has ultimate corporate authorityTotal authority matched by total accountabilityTotal authority can be superseded only by the organization’s owners or by the stateFor corporate boards, the owners are the shareholders; for the SDA church, the owner is the constituency or “membership”

28

Page 29: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Non-Profit Organizations

The governing board has the responsibility:

To determine the organization’s mission and purpose and to focus on the mission.

Johnson and Johnson and the Tylenol crisis (1982)

29

Page 30: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Not-for-Profit Organizations

To lead change; focus on long-range vision and strategies and critical relationships

To ensure legal and ethical integrity and maintain accountability. To act as a conscience, a keeper of human and moral values

To provide proper financial oversight

30

Page 31: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Not-for-Profit Organizations

To provide a window to the outside world for management

To help the organization be understood by its constituencies

To support the CEO and assess his/her performance and assure management competence

31

Page 32: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Not-for-Profit Organizations

To recruit and orient new board members and assess board performance

To request good governance information and ask the crucial questions

To use technology to communicate effectively with other board members and with constituents

32

Page 33: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Not-for-Profit Organizations33

Crucial questions to ask:

Are appropriate financial reports prepared and presented to the finance committee in a timely manner? What are the financial results for the year?

What are the observations or analyses that the finance committee has considered?

Page 34: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Not-for-Profit Organizations

Are there any tax or legal considerations of which we should be aware?

Are we meeting our budget? If not, why not? Are the variances great enough to warrant action on the part of management or the board?

Do we have strong internal controls? Do the controls assure the accuracy of the financial statements?

34

Page 35: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Not-for-Profit Organizations

Are the organization’s investments managed in accordance with board-approved investment policies? How have our investments fared?

Have there been any unexpected events, or do we anticipate external changes, of which the board should be aware?

Are we operating efficiently?

35

Page 36: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Not-for-Profit Organizations

Are our programs valid? Are the revenue sources secure? Are we adapting to the changes in our environment? Are there opportunities that are going unexplored?

Are there any reasons we should be worried?

36

Page 37: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Ethics Scenarios

The Purchase

The Best Investment

37

Page 38: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Individual Board Members

Legal Duties of Individual Board Members:

The Duty of Obedience

The Duty of Loyalty

The Duty of Due Care

38

Page 39: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Individual Board Members

The Duty of Obedience means that board members must insure that:

The organization is “obedient” to its purpose and role as defined by its charter

The organization is “obedient” to the laws of the country in which it operates

39

Page 40: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Individual Board Members

The organization is “obedient” in fulfilling all commitments, both current and previous ones

40

Page 41: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Individual Board Members

The Duty of Loyalty means that board members must:

Act in good faith for the benefit of the organization

Maintain confidentiality of privileged information

41

Page 42: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Individual Board Members

Serve with undivided allegiance when making decisions

Refuse to use their position on the board for personal advantage

42

Page 43: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Individual Board Members

The Duty of Due Care means that the board members must:

Be diligent in managing the affairs of the organization

Be prudent in managing the affairs of the organization

43

Page 44: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Individual Board Members

“Due Care” speaks to an expected level of competence

Perfection is not demanded, but understanding the basics of the mission of the organization, the critical factors to make it successful, and the possible pitfalls is expected

Additional expertise may demanded of board members if they carry specific roles

44

Page 45: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Individual Board Members

Specifics of “due care” may include:

Attending meetings regularlyShowing independent judgment in votingBeing informedReliance on or seeking information from trusted sources

45

Page 46: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Ethics Scenarios

The “Broke” Organization

The Christian Board

46

Page 47: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Audit Committees

The Audit Committee is composed of “outside” members of the board

These members should have:Board business experienceKnowledge of the organization’s finance, accounting, and auditing operationsFacility in obtaining information by inquiry

47

Page 48: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Audit Committees

Primary responsibilities:

Oversee the organization’s internal accounting controls

Review the audit plan and the audited financial statements with the independent auditors

48

Page 49: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Board Assessment

Questions for the personal board member:

To what extent are the goals of the board clear to you?

To what extent is your role on the board clear to you?

49

Page 50: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Board Assessment

Questions for the Board as a group:

How would you rate the board’s problem-solving abilities?To what extent is conflict on the board managed productively?How effective are the board’s decision-making processes?

50

Page 51: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Board Assessment

Questions for the Board regarding the quality of communication:

What is the communication…..Among board members?From leadership to the members?From leadership to the committees?From the members to leadership?Between the board and the staff?

51

Page 52: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Chairing the Board

An effective chair person should:

Both set and stick to the board agenda.

Be able to move beyond the details.

Build unique relationships with each board member and use them to shape consensus.

52

Page 53: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

Boards

Questions?

53

Page 54: Boards:   The Famous and the Infamous

References

Alstadter, Eric. (1998) “Keys to keep your board on track.” Nonprofit World. 16 (6) p 14-15.BoardSource (2007) The Nonprofit Board Answer Book. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley Carter, Bob (2001) “Where are the leaders?” Fund Raising Management. 32(5) p 42-48.Cooper, Lowell (2011) “Effective boards and committees.” Presentation to Pacific Press Publishing

Association BoardDrucker, Peter (1990) Managing the Non-Profit Organization. NY: Harper/Collins.Fager, Chuck (1999) “Baptist Foundation faces investment fraud charges.” Christianity Today.

43(12) p 18-20.Jennings, Marianne. (2012) Business Ethics. 7th ed. Cincinnati, Ohio: South/Western/Cengage

Learning.Jennings, Marianne. (2006) The Seven Signs of Ethical Collapse. NY: St. Martins Press.Lang, Andrew (1994) “Staying financially sound: Knowing which questions to ask can help you

ensure your association’s financial viability.” Association Management 46(1) Masaoka, Jan. (2002) “A board’s financial duties.” Association Management 54(1) p 102-105.Orlikoff, James. (1998) “7 practices of super boards.” Association Management 50(1) p 52-58.Partridge, William (2000) “Getting the board to measure up.” Association Management 52(1) p

59-63.

54