West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 1

BJP ascendency will last (India)......................................................................................................2

BJP ascendency will not last (India)...............................................................................................4

Chris Christie's scandals doom his political future.........................................................................6

Chris Christie's scandals do not doom his political future..............................................................8

Water contamination in West Virginia is cause for concern..........................................................9

Water contamination in West Virginia is not cause for concern.................................................11

Congress Should Pass the Paycheck Fairness Act........................................................................13

Congress Should Reject the Paycheck Fairness Act.....................................................................14

The U.S.P.S. Should Offer Financial Services................................................................................15

The U.S.P.S. Should Not Offer Financial Services.........................................................................17

Global Terrorism is on the Rise....................................................................................................18

Global Terrorism is not on the Rise..............................................................................................20

Sugar is toxic to humans..............................................................................................................22

Sugar is not “toxic” to humans....................................................................................................23

The U.S. should declare a policy “no first use”............................................................................24

The U.S. should not declare a policy “no first use”......................................................................25

Alcohol Sales Should be Not Allowed on Native American Lands................................................26

Alcohol Sales Should be Allowed on Native American Lands.......................................................27

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 2

BJP ascendency will last (India)As one of the largest and most economically powerful nations in the world, a potential

Indian political reformation like Tunisia or Egypt would be a significant strike against corruption worldwide. India’s Bharatiya Janata Party has waited as a patient opposition for more than two decades as the ruling Indian Congress Party managed one of the world’s premier growth economies. With economic decline on the horizon and a host of corruption scandals, Indians have expressed a will to move toward the socially conservative, nationalist BJP. This essay will argue that the BJP will continue to ascend in Indian politics.

The BJP led by prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi is on course to emerge as the biggest party after general elections in May. Given the diverse and fragmented electorate, neither the BJP nor any other party is expected to win the 272 seats needed for an outright majority. The biggest party will seek to form a coalition with regional parties. The Congress, whose campaign is being helmed by Rahul Gandhi, is grappling with public anger over a string of corruption scandals and economic growth hitting a decade-low.1 The BJP would make major gains in Uttar Pradesh while the AAP would win majority of seats in Delhi in the Lok Sabha polls, according to an India Today survey. The survey predicted that the Bharatiya Janata Party will continue its good run in Rajasthan by winning 20-24 of the 25 Lok Sabha seats in the state. The BJP was projected to win 41-49 seats in the electorally crucial Uttar Pradesh if elections were held now. The survey projected a major downslide for the Congress in Uttar Pradesh. It predicted that it will win 4-10 seats if elections were held now.2 The Congress, which had won all seven seats in the national capital in 2009, was not likely to win a single seat if elections were held in January 2014. The BJP was projected to secure 30 percent votes and Congress 16 percent. It said 74 percent of Delhi's residents were satisfied with the work of the AAP government. It said Kejriwal pipped Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi "as preferred choice of prime minister" with 34 percent wanting him for the top job. "Thirty-two percent respondents said they prefer Modi as prime minister. Rahul Gandhi is third at 8 percent," it said. In Rajasthan, where the BJP formed the government with a resounding majority, the survey predicted that the party's good run will continue. It said the BJP will win 20-24 seats in January 2014, with the Congress getting only 0-2 seats and up to five seats will go to others. It said the BJP may secure 54 percent vote share in Rajasthan if Lok Sabha polls were held today while the Congress could secure 33 percent votes.3

The Narendra Modi wave seems to have reached the Bengal shores as well, indicated by the more than two-fold increase in the membership of the BJP's state unit. A BJP leader in West Bengal claimed that the total membership has increased from three lakh in 2011 to more than seven lakh in 2013. Two lakh new members have enrolled in the last six months, which party leaders have attributed to Modi's anointment as the prime ministerial candidate.4 The ABVP, youth wing of the BJP, too witnessed a surge in its membership with the enrolment of 45,000 new activists in the last one year, BJP spokesperson and co-in-charge of the party's Bengal unit Siddhinath Singh told PTI. He further claimed that the BJP's minority and women's wings too witnessed a 50 per cent jump in membership. Singh said, "Two factors are responsible for the expanding BJP membership in West Bengal: Declaration of Modi as PM candidate by the party and the lack of an opposition worth the name in the state."5 The senior BJP leader noted that such enthusiasm had previously been witnessed on two occasions. First, during the Ram Mandir

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 3

agitation in the early 90s and during Atal Bihari Vajpayee's rule at the Centre. "The charisma of Modi working in the entire country is also having its impact in Bengal and we will prove it during Modi's rally in Kolkata on February 5," Singh asserted.6 The BJP and the RSS have traditionally never been able to make much of an impact in West Bengal, though the party's former avatar Jan Sangh was co-founded by the son of the soil, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee. The 27 per cent Muslim community in the state, which wields a considerable influence in at least 140 Assembly constituencies out of 294, plays a key role in the power sweepstake, courted aggressively by all frontline political parties.7 The Congress is in equally grave trouble. It lost support in Malda, a district north of West Bengal’s capital Kolkata. The seat had remained loyal even through the decades of Left ascendancy, thanks principally to the local influence of a politician who hailed from there, Ghani Khan Choudhary. The veteran Ghani Khan has passed away. His brother Abu Naser, a lawmaker, did not vote on party lines. His colleague Emani Biswas, from neighboring Murshidabad, refused the compromise of half-measures and gave his vote to Mamata Banerjee, the Trinamool chief minister of West Bengal. This rebellion could reduce the Congress to just one seat in Bengal after the coming general elections.8

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 4

BJP ascendency will not last (India)Amidst corruption scandals and a declining economy, the electorate of the world’s

largest democracy is pushing for regime change in its upcoming election cycle. The strongly conservative Bharatiya Janata Party of India has gained ground in the polls and looks poised to replace the incumbent Congress Party in Parliament. But the swelling of angst among Indians may be due to more entrenched problems than can be solved by a trendy regime change. This essay will argue that the BJP will not continue to ascend in Indian politics.

Growth estimates for 2013-14 show India doing below 5% for two successive years. The government is unable to control rising prices. Job statistics show employment rose by a mere 2% annually over the last decade, with increases coming mostly in low-paying areas in the service sector.9 Manmohan Singh did a spectacular turn when he reformed the economy and rescued it from a balance of payments crisis in 1991. But his tenure as prime minister has not been so successful. Narendra Modi, prime ministerial hopeful, comes with some reformist credentials burnished from his stint as chief minister of Gujarat. He supported manufacturing, injected a bit of flexibility in labor laws and took interest in developing infrastructure. But what does Modi bring to the plate that Manmohan Singh didn't? His campaign hasn't provided any clear answers yet. It's easy enough to bash UPA for its record, which the Modi campaign has been doing with gusto. But BJP too has been part of the problem. It has blocked even those reformist initiatives UPA has undertaken. Since UPA too has been markedly ambivalent about such initiatives, there has in effect been an UPA/NDA consensus not to disturb the economic status quo. In order to make his claim of representing economic change convincing, Modi needs to come up with more concrete proposals about how he would put India on a high growth trajectory if voted to power.10

The sudden popularity of India’s anti-graft Aam Aadmi Party is prompting concern at companies such as Maruti Suzuki India (MSIL) Ltd. that this year’s general election will fail to create a stable government. Arvind Kejriwal’s one-year-old Aam Aadmi plans to contest as many as 300 seats after taking power in the national capital last month, according to senior party leader Yogendra Yadav. That threatens to reduce the chances of the ruling Congress Party or main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party emerging with a majority in the election, which is due by May.11 “There is a worry that the AAP might split the vote,” R.C. Bhargava, chairman of New Delhi-based Maruti Suzuki India, the nation’s largest carmaker, said in a Jan. 9 interview. “We’ll have to see what sort of coalitions are formed.” Kejriwal, 45, became Delhi’s chief minister after his local campaign, using brooms to symbolize the sweeping away of graft, ended the dominance of Congress in the city. Aam Aadmi, which means “common man” in Hindi, has withdrawn a decision by Congress to allow foreign retailers to open supermarkets in the capital region, the state’s Industries Minister Satyendra Jain said today. Competition from retail chains that sell multiple brands could lead to large job losses among small local stores, Jain said.12

Many observers expect Indian voters to punish the ruling Congress party in this spring's general election for the country's sharp economic slowdown and a string of corruption scandals. But the poll may become a referendum on all established politicians amid a groundswell of anger at their failings. Thousands of young people joined protests across the country, shaking the Congress-led government and turning the fatal gang rape of a Delhi student into a darkly defining moment of India's recent history. It also marked another moment

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 5

in what many see as a growing nationwide awakening among young Indians, increasingly despairing of the way their country is being run.13 It was also an upset too for Congress's main rival, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), denying it an outright majority.14 Congress, which has led India for most of its years since independence under the control of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty, is the chief target of this growing anger. The party, at the helm of the ruling coalition over the past decade, has presided over an alphabet soup of corruption scandals. In the meantime, India's economy has gone from boom to near-bust. But the whole political class has become tainted. A third of India's elected lawmakers are accused criminals, a figure that has risen with each election.15 In a recent television interview, the Congress campaign leader Rahul Gandhi peppered his answers with references to "empowering" India's "young" and "women", regardless of the questions. But some of the shine has come off Mr. Kejriwal's "anti-politician" appeal now that he has joined the political class. Since becoming Delhi's chief minister, he has been attacked for using the job as a protest platform, instead of governing the city region. His defenders say that is unfair. But a sit-down protest, blocking central Delhi and aimed at winning control of the city's police, dismayed many of his middle-class backers.16

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 6

Chris Christie's scandals doom his political futureNew Jersey Governor Chris Christie is in trouble. In September of last year, the George Washington Bridge, connecting New York and New Jersey, shut down all but two of its lanes, as per orders from a Christie aid and a Christie administration appointee.17 Severe traffic congestion ensued—even school buses and emergency vehicles were stalled. Christie’s political adversaries immediately suggested he was involved. He vehemently denied this,18 firing aide Bridget Anne Kelley, whom he blamed for making a political decision to order the closings (Fort Lee, New Jersey is controlled by Democrats and its mayor is considered by the Christie camp as a political enemy).19 But Daviid Wildstein, whom Christie appointed to the Port Authority and who was clearly involved in the decision, maintains Christie knew what was happening all along. Meanwhile, Hoboken Mayor Dawn Zimmer alleges that Christie aids pressured her to fast-track a redevelopment plan favoring businesses friendly to Christie. When she refused, she alleges, Hoboken was punished by receiving less than $400,000 of relief aid for Hurricane Sandy, although she’d requested $127 million in aid. Zimmer says she has proof of all of this.20 Perhaps politicians can make mistakes, or even commit ethical violations, and if they’re nice, people will forgive them. But since Christie’s style has always been confrontational and has struck many as mean-spirited. There is little support for him now. These scandals will doom Chris Christie’s political career, for three reasons: First, he’s lost support in New Jersey. Second, the scandals will deepen. Third, his national reputation is doomed.First, Christie has lost key support in his home state. Christie has lost key supporters all across New Jersey. One notable example of this is the Star-Ledger newspaper, which endorsed Christie in the last gubernatorial race but has publicly expressed regret for doing so.21 Christie has lost what little support he had among ordinary working people in New Jersey; protests at Palisades Industrial Park in front of the George Washington Bridge have demanded Christie's resignation.22

Second, the scandals are more likely to get worse for Christie before they get any better, according to Political Wire founder Taegan D. Goddard. Goddard believes Fourth Amendment protections won’t apply to Christie’s aides and they will eventually be compelled to disclose everything, and media scrutiny will continue as well.23 There is also the more recent probe into his use of the state's executive helicopter to fly over the bridge closings, suggesting he had more knowledge of their impact than he initially suggested.24 Christie's story seems to be changing. First he said he did not investigate the closures. Then he said he had. As Rachel Maddow’s producer Steve Benen writes, “If Christie’s version of events had been consistent and reliable throughout, it’d be easier to believe his arguments about what role, if any, he played in his aides’ misconduct.”25 Even Christie's claim that he never knew Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich seem contradicted by evidence that he dined with the Mayor in an effort to bring him on board with a tax relief proposal.26 Christie is no longer an effective governor—something even his enemies once conceded he was. Political analyst and former White House advisor David Gergen points out that “having to fight back on various fronts” constitutes a “major distraction” for the Governor and his staff.27 Finally, Christie’s national reputation is ruined. It’s almost certain that Christie, at one time the projected GOP presidential frontrunner for 2016, won’t be running. In December, he led Hillary

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 7

Clinton in the polls 48-46 percent. By the beginning of February, Clinton was up 55-39 percent.28 The New York Times reports that “Democratic Party operatives have churned out 11 different videos depicting Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey as a revenge-happy gridlock maker who cannot keep his story straight.”29 Moreover, Democrats are “are unleashing attacks on any Republican in the country who dares to defend him publicly, from a potential Senate candidate in New Hampshire to a New York congressman.”30

The old adage, “it couldn’t happen to a nicer guy” may hold true here, but however he may have been characterized prior to these scandals, it’s clear that Chris Christie’s political career is coming to a hard crash.

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 8

Chris Christie's scandals do not doom his political futureThe Christie counter-narrative goes something like this: Christie may have talked tough to his political opponents in New Jersey, but there is no evidence he personally did anything to cause traffic delays or illegally condition federal relief aid to his adversaries. Instead, a rogue staffer colluded with another public official to close the bridge lanes; that's why no emails or other publicly released documents implicate the Governor. As for playing politics with aid, Christie's office divvied out the aid fairly, not everyone got what they wanted, and some people were bitter about it, but that doesn't mean their allegations constitute proof of misconduct. Before declaring New Jersey Governor Chris Christie politically dead, it’s important to remember, as Political Wire founder Taegan Goddard points out, that even under the worst interpretation of the facts, Christie may not have done anything illegal.31 It’s certainly true that having your staff instigate traffic disasters and play politics with federal relief aid, presumably right under your nose makes you look like a bad administrator, but for now, that’s the worst we can say about Christie. Even if we end up able to say more—to say that he knew what was going on and even influenced it—that doesn’t ruin him. This essay argues that Chris Christie’s scandals, whatever their resolution, won’t doom his political future. He’s going to stay in office, conservatives now love him more than ever, and he can recover down the road even if things look bad for him now. He would not be the first nationally prominent politician to do so. First, Christie is unlikely to be either impeached or recalled, meaning he gets to use his office as he wishes until the end of his second term, with no re-election pressures. We can be confident there won't be a recall vote, at least for a year; Christie was just re-elected, and New Jersey law requires voters to wait a year from the beginning of a term.32 By that time, there’s at least a possibility that things will have blown over. Even then, an overwhelming number of signatures is required to get a recall on the ballot in New Jersey.33 PostPolitics managing editor Chris Cillizza thinks Christie has an even lower chance of being impeached than losing the 2016 Presidential election--certainly a longshot now.34 Second, Christie’s troubles have actually endeared him to conservatives—and that’s important, because he was never a darling of the far-right before. As news has gotten worse for the Governor, his support among hardcore Republicans has increased, as they see him as threatened by a “common enemy” – the Democrats, and the so-called liberal media.35 Former Vice Presidential candidate Paul Ryan called him a “fantastic governor” at the beginning of February, and Republican leaders want him to stay on as chairman of the powerful Republican Governors’ Association.36 The scandal even got Christie a CPAC invitation, increasing support from hardcore conservatives, even if this doesn't help him win a presidential election.37 Finally, Christie may recover from the worst of this. According to polls released at the end of January, a quarter of Americans have no opinion of him, and those that do are actually split even on what the bridge-gate scandal says about him.38 And New Jersey citizens actually like him better than the rest of the country does.39 Scandal-plagued politicians can remain powerful out of office. GOP political consultant Mike Murphy expects Christie to keep bringing in money for the party, and remain a popular speaker, regardless of how things pan out in New Jersey.40 Another conservative commentator advises Christie to “get back to [his] roots” and be a

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 9

“regular guy,” with an in-your-face style that has actually been a success for most of Christie’s career.41

Political dramas seldom end the way they do in constructed melodramas. There are plenty of stories of politicians surviving scandals, or rising from the ashes once the smoke has cleared. Because Christie has endeared himself to a certain political brand, and because he’s still Governor of New Jersey and is highly likely to remain so through the end of his term, he may very well survive all of this, and political obituary writers may want to let their fingers rest and see how all of this turns out.

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 10

Water contamination in West Virginia is cause for concernOn January 9, 2014, a chemical spill threatened the water supply of 300,000 residents of West Virginia, and sparked a national debate about the safety of America’s water supplies. The chemical, MCHM for short, made its way from the offending facility, owned by the ironically-named Freedom Industries, into the West Virginia American Water intake, treatment and distribution center.42 Multiple hospitalizations occurred, particularly in Charleston, where patients were suffering “nausea, eye infections, and some were vomiting.”43 The spill negatively affected the economy, with businesses reporting over $1 million in losses in the Charleston area alone.44 Since MCHM is used to wash coal, the spill raised questions about America’s energy policy. According to USA Today’s John Bacon, “MCHM can cause skin irritation, vomiting and diarrhea, but is not regulated under federal law.”45 This essay offers three reasons why the West Virginia spills should make us very concerned about our short- and long-term safety. First, the water in West Virginia may still be unsafe a month later. Second, the crisis reveals how precarious our water supplies really are. Third, the crisis also reveals America’s misguided and disaster-prone fossil fuel addiction, which is unlikely to get better any time soon.First, it’s far from clear that water in West Virginia is safe even now. Chemically-related hopsitalizations have doubled since the water was deemed safe by the governor.46 Even a month after the spill, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention advised pregnant women to consider alternative water sources.47 Students have been sent home, also a month after the spill, “amid reports of potential water contamination” related to the spill.48 Even more disturbing are recent revelations that, according to the Weather Channel’s news service, about 300 gallons of a second chemical, known as PPH, apparently were also in the same tank as the MCHM that spilled into the river.49

Second, the spill revealed terrible facts about threats to our nation’s water supplies. Experts at House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee hearings at the beginning of February remarked on the stupidity of building a storage facility upstream from a water treatment plant, something that could only have happened with a glaring regulation gap, according to the chairman of the independent safety board.50 West Virginia American Water, the company running the water treatment facility contaminated by Freedom Industries, was unaware of the storage of the chemicals upstream.51 Although the Freedom Industries had filed the information with the state, the information was never shared with West Virginia American Water or the agency regulating water—distinct from the agency regulating the chemicals. 52 According to experts, this is a gap which exists across the nation: “wide disparities in how well the nation’s drinking-water supplies are monitored.”53 Over 1,000 toxic dumpsites threaten America’s water supplies.54 Finally, the disaster is an indictment of our entire industrial system—in particular, our addiction to coal and other fossil fuels. Guardian columnist Ana Marie Cox points out that the decline in West Virginia coal supplies (still considerable, but the state is losing out to Wyoming and other plain states) means politicians in West Virginia have become “increasingly desperate to make their state as attractive as possible to industry.”55 That explains why state authorities “knew

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 11

about Freedom Industries’ massive stockpile of MCMH as long as a year ago and did nothing about it”—because West Virginia fears abandonment by the coal industry.56 That’s what happens when state economies are built around singular fossil fuel extraction industries. Until we transition away from fossil fuels, disasters like this are inevitable. Author Jeff Biggers, who wrote The United States of Appalachia, remarked after the spill: “West Virginia has been drinking contaminated water for decades. And it always will – unless the nation decides to end our denial of the ever mounting health and human costs of the coal industry, launch a coalfields regeneration transition plan, and finally bring justice to the coalfields.”57

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 12

Water contamination in West Virginia is not cause for concernWhen a spill of coal-processing chemicals contaminated drinking water for 300,000 West Virginians,58 public officials sprang into action. Nobody died. National attention augmented local concern. Considering only about 15 percent of the state's residents were advised not to drink the water during the crisis,59 the outcome may well outweigh the harm of the spill. “As disasters go,” reads a house editorial in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, “West Virginia’s could have been worse — the approximately 7,500 gallons of the chemical 4-methylcyclohexane methanol that accidentally leaked from a 35,000-gallon holding tank is not necessarily fatal although it sickened people.” And that’s not the only bright side. This essay offers three reasons why the water contamination crisis in West Virginia, while certainly an eye-opener and a wake-up call, is not cause for serious concern. First, the water is safe now, so this wasn’t a terminal crisis. Second, the event brought out the best in West Virginians. Third, the event sparked investigations, new regulations, and a positive national response. First, the water is at least generally safe now; major supplies are not contaminated. The state’s Bureau for Public Health calls the water “usable,” and the ever-cautious Center for Disease Control says public water in West Virginia is safe—even for pregnant women.60 These findings occur on the basis of thousands of samples. Follow-up testing will continue. Governor Tomblin says he and his staff are drinking the water.61 Second, the public crisis brought out the best in many portions of the public. News writers in the state wrote inspirationally of college students collecting donations with their professors,62 while emergency responders gave more than their all, working overtime in areas hardest hit and with the most vulnerable sections of the population.63 Firefighter Ryan Pennington praised “the dedication to serve that has been shown by all emergency responders.”64 West Virginia American Water, the company entrusted with the state’s water supply, has announced credits for customers and small businesses in the wake of the disaster, to assist in system-flushing.65 It’s also interesting to note that West Virginia American Water did not shut down the water supply altogether, but instead issued a do-not-drink-or-bathe order, which prevented what would have been a far costlier disaster--an interruption of industrial water use, which would have shut down activity all across the state.66 It’s rare that the actions of government, citizens, responders, and private corporations are all simultaneously praiseworthy. In many ways, the water disaster showed what America can be. Finally, the crisis has spawned investigations and new legislation. That’s how policy is made. CNN reporters Drew Griffin, David Fitzpatrick and Patricia DiCarlo report that there’s going to be a federal grand jury investigation into the spill, and that subpoenas have been issued to key players.67 The Governor has also announced legislation to empower the state’s Department of Environmental Protection to prevent future crises.68 That legislation will regulate above-ground storage tanks, particularly those near public water supplies and distribution systems.69 The National Science Foundation has awarded several rapid response grants for further study of plumbing and water-treatment systems in West Virginia.70 The U.S. Senate has followed suit: At the end of January, three U.S. Senators introduced legislation to streamline oversight of chemical facilities and solidify response procedures.71

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 13

Although there are many examples of American states, and even the federal government, failing in the face of disaster, it’s refreshing to see situations where almost everyone does the right thing. In this case, the bad guys even lost, too—Freedom Industries, the offending chemical dumpers, is declaring bankruptcy.72 If an accident that didn’t kill anybody puts a bad business out of business, sparks a national debate and legislation aimed at improving our waterways, and reveals personal heroism and good citizenship on top of all that, some might even declare that a win.

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 14

Congress Should Pass the Paycheck Fairness Act“Currently, U.S. businesses can still legally justify pay disparities with market forces or salary history. This workaround has been

called out as one of the factors that may reflect previous and ongoing sex discrimination.”—Kim Keating, Founder and managing director, Keating Advisors73

The call for equity in pay between women and men has been made for nearly two generations. Despite several legislative efforts74, the average woman still makes 77 cents for every dollar earned by men, according to the latest U.S. Census.75 Paycheck inequity maintains a system of male privilege that comes at the disadvantage of women across America. Despite any drawbacks, establishing legislation that demands equal pay for equal work would create a “happier, wealthier and more equitable society.”76

Far from just being a “woman’s issue” (whatever that means), pay inequity undermines the overall economy and social fabric of the country. In such a system, more families are forced to seek government assistance and the rate of poverty continues. “The pay gap hurts the economy, hurts families, hurts businesses and hurts our country’s competitiveness abroad. Women have made huge gains in the workplace but real job equality won't exist until it's reflected in a paycheck.”77

Much hope was placed in the Ledbetter Act, but the legislation did not go far enough to remedy the full concerns of women and families. “The Ledbetter Act kept the courthouse doors open. Now we must shore up our equal pay laws so that women have the tools they need to fight back against pay discrimination.”78

Fortunately, new legislation that would fill gaps in the Ledbetter Act is being proposed. This would not only bring remedies for violations of equal pay, but furthers tightens loopholes in employer defense, collect pay data for civil rights enforcement, and prohibit retaliation79 against employees that choose to discuss their pay.80 “The Paycheck Fairness Act is a commonsense piece of legislation that would strengthen the Equal Pay Act in a number of important ways by making it easier to identify and remedy discriminatory pay decisions, closing loopholes in the law81, and providing incentives for employers to voluntarily comply with the law.”82

Adopting the Paycheck Fairness Act would go a long way to addressing pay inequity. Alternative approaches that do not guarantee equity presume different stages of inequity during a woman’s career, the privilege of flexibility, and that equity would lead to frivolous lawsuits83. This is an institutionalized problem in the American workplace that must be addressed at the highest levels of government. “Pay inequity exists from the very beginning of an individual’s career. This means that gender-based income inequality is not a circumstantial issue; it is an institutionalized problem.”84

With strong public support, it is time Congress and the President stop stalling on the Paycheck Fariness Act.85 “The stalling of the Paycheck Fairness Act has been particularly stunning considering that national polls tell us there is overwhelming support for policies that would help women get equal pay for equal work. Voters get that this bill goes hand in hand with addressing economic mobility for women.”86 In 2014, there is no reason our society cannot transcend the barriers of sex and gender within workplace pay. Women deserve equal pay for equal work. That basic sentiment is irrefutable. Obama showed leadership in support the Ledbetter Act. Now it is time to take the next step toward equality.

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 15

Congress Should Reject the Paycheck Fairness Act“I don’t deny that discrimination exists or that there are some bad employers; but I reject the idea that society and the

workplace is inherently hostile to women.”—Sabrina Schaeffer, executive director of the Independent Women’s Forum87

That women should be paid the same as men for the same work is a widely shared sentiment. However, the media and certain non-profit groups continue to shroud this discussion is misconceptions and misinformation. Criticism ranges from decrying the so-called “pay gap” as an illusion to more measured evaluations based on statistical and cultural trends in the workplace and society.

Some claim that there has been so much distortion of the truth that the wage/pay gap is simply a myth. Morever, adopting legislation like the Paycheck Fairness Act would be counterproductive. “The wage gap…is a myth. In the past, women indeed were paid less than men but it has been proven over and over again that women earn the same or more than men if all things are equal…What Larson’s ill-conceived bill…will do is set women back decades despite the great strides they have made since entering the workforce.”88

Moreover, this legislation is unlikely to pass in Congress. Even supporters give the bill a poor prognosis. “The Fair Pay Act was then -- and is now -- the bill we need, because it would shine the light on unequal pay once and for all. But realistically, no pay equity bill is going to pass a lukewarm Senate and woman-hostile House. It's already been two decades, and the business lobby is too strong for mere women's groups to overcome.”89

Much of this sentiment lies in a different conception of how the so-called wage gap functions. Theorist Christina Hoff Summers argues that any inequality found in the data is a result of personal choices and larger cultural forces. She cites statements by the American Association of University Women and NOW to illustrate how “’Women’s personal choices are similarly fraught with inequities…’ It speaks of women being ‘pigeonholed’ into ‘pink-collar’ jobs in health and education. According to NOW, powerful sexist stereotypes ‘steer’ women and men ‘toward different education, training, and career paths.”90 It is far from clear how the Paycheck Fairness Act would resolve these larger concerns.

Still others take issue with the specific “77cents” statistic. In fact, newer women in the workplace, referred to as “Millennials” are starting to close the gap.91 Choices often affect the perception of a gap. “These choices have benefits, but they also reduce pay—for both men and women. When economists control for such factors, they find the gender gap largely disappears.”92 It also fails to consider a comparison between the salaries of women and men in the same profession.93 In fact, a study by the U.S. Department of labor found that “after controlling for occupation, experience, and other choices, women earn 95 percent as much as men do.”94

Even though some perceive a 5% relative difference in pay, the Paycheck Fairness Act carries a huge risk of undermining the achievements women have already made in the workplace. “It will put employers in a position of either paying women less than they negotiate for when seeking a new job or it will take away women’s flexibility in negotiating for a lower salary for more flexible hours.”95 Given that there is opposition in Congress, the statistics do not assume formidable barriers and risks, Congress should not pass the Paycheck Fairness Act. There is only a risk it could hurt women and families that are making progress today.

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 16

The U.S.P.S. Should Offer Financial Services“Banks and other financial institutions play a critical role in American society. Accounts at

federally insured depository institutions provide safety and security, protect households from theft, help families save money, and can open the door to affordable credit. Yet, more than a quarter of American households are left outside or on the fringes of the traditional financial

system.”—U.S.P.S.96

A lack of banking services, combined with scandalous non-banking lenders, has led many in America with a difficult choice: no financial services or service providers that charge in excess of 200% interest on simple loans. When the latter option is chosen, many fall into a cycle of debt that only further entrenches poverty. To address these issues, The United States Postal Service (USPS) should offer non-banking financial services.

With a rash of bank closures since 2012, many areas of the countries are left without bank. This has created what some refer to as “banking deserts.”97 Over 2,000 banks closed since 2012. 93% of those were in “Zip Codes where the median income is below the national average. Payday lenders, pawn shops, and other exploitative businesses have been happy to step in, but the high costs of their services leave them open to competition, and the increasing interest of regulators leaves them vulnerable.”98

The lack of banking in impoverished neighborhoods allows predatory lenders to take advantage of people in need.99 “Studies have shown that payday lenders disproportionately exploit minority neighborhoods with loans that are issued at an average annual interest rate of 455%....these high rates lead to a cycle of indebtedness.”100 The massive amount of fees and extravagant interest rates can devastate a family. According to Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), “about 10 percent of a family's income just to manage getting checks cashed, bills paid, and, sometimes, a short-term loan to tide them over. That's more than a full month's income just to try to navigate the basics.”101 In such a situation, the USPS could become a welcomed oasis in these deserts.

Allowing the USPS to conduct basic financial transactions, such as short-term loans, would not be too far from financial services they already provide, such as money order and prepaid debit cards.102 This is also a common practice internationally.103 With 35,000 outlets across the country, postal agencies could go a long way to reach those in banking deserts and revive the USPS.104105

Such services could also become a financial boon for the USPS. They estimate a potential of $9.5 million in revenue.106 This would also give those consumers in need a lower-cost choice. Not being an explicitly profit driven body, the USPS would allow consumers to choose USPS loans at a much lower rate. This would force predatory lenders and payday loan operations to the background.107

Big banks oppose this idea on the grounds that it would force unfair competition because a government body already carries a certain amount of name recognition and more. However, the USPS would more likely fill in gaps where those banks no longer exist.108 Also, partnerships could remove these threats. Banks currently partner with payday loan businesses. However, “the USPS would not compete with banks but would partner with them by reaching markets underserved by current bank branch networks and using the Postal Service's credibility to back products.”109

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 17

Given the widespread need for non-banking financial services and an alternative to astronomical interest rates, it makes sense for the USPS to fill the void. Not only does the public trust the post office more than banks, postal offices are more accessible and ripe for expansion in services.

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 18

The U.S.P.S. Should Not Offer Financial Services“But there are formidable barriers facing the agency. Any changes to the business would require congressional approval, a Sisyphean task considering the contentious political wrangling over the future of the Postal Service.”—Danielle Douglas110

Despite the promises made by the United States Postal Service (USPS), expanding their operations to include non-banking financial services would do little to address the needs it describes and would force unfair competition onto struggling banks.111 Several myths surround the call for the USPS to conduct such services as payday loans.

The idea of “banking deserts” has recently gained attention. However, this is a misleading characterization. “Most of the people who use short-term financial services could use banks, if it made sense to them to handle their money the way people who use banks do. Quite a few of them are young people, who in ten years will have bank accounts and credit histories.”112 If the “desert” thesis is true, it should be temporary.

Of greater concern is the idea that the USPS cannot generate sufficient revenue to justify the new program, nor “revive” the agency. The USPS claims that it can reclaim 10% of the $89 billion spent in financial fees.113 Yet this leads to a paradoxical situation. In order to attract customers away from payday loan operations, they would have to charge a much lower rate. However, that rate can only go so low before the promise of profit falls. Adam Levitin, professor of law at Georgetown University, argues that this questions the very role the USPS seeks to assume. “This points to a real tension in any sort of postal banking proposal: to the extent that a postal banking system is designed to provide low-cost services to consumers, it is potentially at odds with the USPS’s need to find new revenue sources. Put another way, is the mission of a postal bank profit or financial inclusion?”114

Moreover, small-dollar lending would create undue competition for banks. These banks are currently “struggling to retool their small-dollar lending platforms under regulatory scrutiny.”115 Ken Clayton, chief counsel of the American Bankers Association, “This new entity could be perceived by many as a government-endorsed and preferred provider of financial products…The impact on banks already serving these communities would be substantial.”116

Even if we accept that “competition is good” as a maxim for action, some argue that this would be a form of bad competition. If the government can sponsor an organization, that organization has ready-made appeal and constitutes unfair competition. “Given the Postal Service's unique governmental status, its entry into the financial services market would raise serious unfair competition concerns with the potential to allow it to become the next Government Sponsored Enterprise (GSE) in the broad-based financial services arena.”117

Allowing the United States Postal Service to conduct “non-banking” financial services sounds seemingly indicates that there would be no direct competition with banks. However, banks are beginning to change the services they offer to encompass a broader audience. Acting now would derail those efforts in a bad faith effort by the government. Moreover, these ideas are placed within a narrative of mischaracterization that both distorts the issue and prevent real change. Are far better option would be to regulate those predatory lenders.

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 19

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 20

Global Terrorism is on the RiseWith the death of Osama Bin Laden, Western nations counter-terrorism campaigns and

the fall of multiple dictators like Muammar al-Gaddafi it would seem as through conditions favor a time of peace and terrorists have reached a stopgap. However, this is not the case, in fact, global terrorism is on the rise due to the proliferation of lone wolf acts of terrorism in the US, London and China, the increasing strength of Hezbollah and the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East and the general failure of anti – terror campaigns by the United States.

Traditionally major acts of terror are often linked to specific terrorist groups or network due to the need for coordination between individuals and to account of the scale of such operations. This was the case with September 11th and many other attacks across the globe. However, another form of terrorism has also cropped up that has given the anti terrorism community trouble resolving, namely lone wolf terrorists. Lone wolf terrorism is being commonly understood as a small group of individuals being inspired by a terrorist group but acting upon their personal will.118 The Boston Bombing serves as a prime example. On April 18, 2013 CNN reported, “the terrorist attack, near the marathon's finish line, triggered widespread screaming and chaos, shattered windows and barricades and sent smoke billowing into the air at Copley Square.”119 The Boston Bombing also shows how incredibly dangerous and frightening acts of lone wolf terrorism can be. Not long after, In London another act of lone wolf terrorism was committed by two individuals against an off duty soldier. On May 23, 2013 The Week reported, “British intelligence officials are treating … [the]… brutal murder of an off-duty soldier on a London street as an act of terrorism by lone wolves. The suspects are believed to be Islamist extremists inspired by al Qaeda but with no formal ties to any organized group.”120 This act as well as the Boston Bombing demonstrates how difficult lone wolf terrorism is to deal with given that there is only one to a few individuals to intercept versus a vast network. In response to an act of lone wolf terrorism in Beijing’s Capital Airport in July a Chinese judge highlights this difficulty by writing, “each person who feels wronged, could be a time bomb.”121 Given that three major acts of lone wolf terrorism have taken place within three months it is clear that global acts of terror are on the rise.

Although lone wolf terrorism has been recently emboldened by major successive acts of terror significant terror groups, like Hezbollah and the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East, are getting stronger. Even though the EU joined Israel and the US in recognizing Hezbollah as a Terrorist organization in an effort to disrupt its violence Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah stated, “the aim of this decision is to subdue us, force us to retreat ... to fear. But I say to you that through this decision you will achieve only failure and disappointment."122 Hezbollah’s resurgent strength is problematic for stability in the Middle East given that the group will continue to threaten Israel as well as aid Iran and Syria rather than seek diplomatic solutions with Western nations. There is also instability fueled by terrorism in Egypt is, from the Muslim Brotherhood, sparked by the overthrow of President Mohamed Morsi. The LA Times reports, Egypt’s military commander deepened his role in the nation’s turbulent politics Wednesday by calling for mass demonstrations to support an army crackdown on “violence and terrorism” that have spread.”123 The Muslim Brotherhood has been responsible for a number of terrorist attacks across Egypt and now is on the defensive and more dangerous than ever as the

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 21

Egyptian military continues to back them into a corner. With these two terrorist organizations across the Middle East and Africa it is clear that terrorism is presently on the rise.

Despite terrorist groups gaining strength and newfound purpose in the Middle East and Africa as well as lone wolf terrorism cropping up across the globe Drones are another reason that terrorism has been getting stronger and attacks more frequent as they are an arguably toxic counter terrorism measure that seems to incite more terror than it resolves. The RAND Corp recently did a study that concluded “to the extent drone strikes “work,” their effectiveness is more likely to lie in disrupting militant operations at the tactical level than as a “silver bullet” that will reverse the course of the war and singlehandedly defeat al-Qa’ida.”124 This study is key to challenge the growing misconception that drones are the almighty counter-terror weapon, because the Pew Research Center indicates that 56% of Americans still approve and believe in drones effectiveness. In reality the drones work against the US counter terrorism efforts by creating conditions of terror themselves. This process is explained by Noam Chomsky, ““The Obama administration is dedicated to increasing terrorism,” … “it’s doing it all over the world. Obama, first of all, is running the biggest terrorist operation that exists, maybe in history. The drone assassination campaigns… All of these operations, they are terror operations.”125

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 22

Global Terrorism is not on the RiseAlthough there have been a few rouge cases of terrorism namely the Boston Bombing

and butchering of an off duty soldier in London diplomatic forces spearheaded by the UN have become united against terror under a series of Anti-Terror resolutions have helped push global terrorism on the decline.126 Global terrorism is not on the rise because multilateral diplomatic action has been taken against major terrorist organizations like Hezbollah, increased diplomacy in the wake of Bin Laden’s death has brought countries together to fight terrorism and terrorism is being fought from within like Egypt suppressing the Muslim Brotherhood.

To many countries Hezbollah is classified as a terrorist organization for its participation in plane jacking, repelling Western forces, repeatedly attacking Israel and aiding rouge states like Syria and Iran. This is why the European Union officially labeled Hezbollah as a terrorist organization. Euro News reports the EU delegation stated, “we cannot just close our eyes and set a precedent that it’s possible to act as a terrorist with acts as you see in Bulgaria or in Cyprus or what is also acted in Syria by this group.”127 By labeling Hezbollah as a terrorist organization all 28 EU member nations have agreed to freeze the terror groups assets and refuse to issue its members visas to limit its capabilities.128 By implementing such measures at a broad based scale it will be very difficult for Hezbollah to accomplish its agenda. Furthermore, the cooperation amongst nations across the globe to work against common threats demonstrates how global terrorism is on the decline, because fewer nations are willing to tolerate such injustices.

Another example of a major terrorist organization getting knocked down a few pegs is evidenced by Egypt’s military overthrowing Mohamed Morsi, the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and backing the terrorist organization into a corner by calling upon civilians to help revive stability.129 Reuters reports, “The stunning fall from power of President Mohamed Morsi, and the Muslim Brotherhood which backed him, has upended politics in the volatile Middle East.”130 Despite sparking some instability in Egypt the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood has lost its grip on the reigns of power in Egypt indicates that they groups prominence will begin to fade. Because now they will be ostracized by both the citizens of Egypt and surrounding nations now that their political backbone has collapsed. Furthermore, the Egyptian military has taken responsibility of ending all hostility caused by the Muslim Brotherhood. Egypt’s military chief, General Abdul-Fattah el –Sisi stated, “I'm asking you to show the world... If violence is sought, or terrorism is sought, the military and the police are authorized to confront this. Egyptians on all sides interpreted Sisi's words as a signal that he intends to intensify a crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist groups."131 Another key indicator that terrorism is on the decline is that like Egypt locals are beginning to stand up to oppressive terrorist groups by enacting their own anti-terror measures. For example in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan “the government… said it would defeat terrorism by providing the local youths with jobs and reasonable wages, and reviving sick industrial units in the province. Actions like this prove that it is becoming more and more difficult for terrorists to take root.

More important than influential terrorist organizations being quashed are the diplomatic moves being made across the globe to put an end to acts of terrorism. The Heritage Foundation reports, “In April, the U.S. and Afghanistan concluded a landmark Strategic

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 23

Partnership Agreement (SPA) laying a… framework for the U.S. to maintain a residual presence to train Afghan forces and conduct counterterrorism missions.”132 This agreement will help to decrease future terrorist organizations from taking root in Afghanistan after the United States withdraws its troops. With increased diplomatic cooperation to end terrorism it is very likely that the present decline in global terrorism will continue to fall. Already major successes have been achieved that have cultivated a foundation for preventing terrorism making future successes even more likely to be effective. The National consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism at the University of Maryland conducted a study and found, “from 1991 through 2000 the United States had an average of 41 terrorist attacks per year. From 2002 through 2010, the number was just 16 per year.”133 Therefore, given that major terrorist organizations like Hezbollah and the Muslim Brotherhood have been reigned in and increased multilateral cooperation to end terrorism is spreading across the globe it is safe to say global terrorism is on the decline.

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 24

Sugar is toxic to humans"Would you rather be on the American diet ... or have parents be full cousins?... This data is telling us it’s a toss up."—Wayne

Potts, Professor of Biology at the University of Utah134

Our parents have told us for years not to eat so much candy because sugar will rot your teeth. But according to a new study, even the recommended doses can toxic.135 The amount of sugar intake for Americans rose by 50% from the 1970s to the late 2000s.136 Researchers at the University of Utah recently published a ground-breaking study of mice that bears direct importance for human health in the context of sugar.

The researchers fed mice the equivalent of a healthy human diet plus 25% added sugars.137 The 25% added sugars were added in conjunction with current National Research Council guidelines that recommend that “added sugar should not account for more than 25 percent of a person's diet.”138 Basically, that is the amount of sugars in three cans of soda.139

The results were shocking and provided the first real evidence that what is currently considered ‘safe’ and substantially undermine mammalian health.140 After separating a control group and sugar-fed group of mice, the research showed that females were twice as likely to die early. “Males in the sugar group weren't able to hold onto territory as well as other males…and produced one-quarter fewer offspring than controls on a standard diet -- the same degree of impact as cousin-level inbreeding.”141

Professor Wayne Potts, the study’s lead author, drew direct connections between this study and human health. “Our results provide evidence that added sugar consumed at concentrations currently considered safe exerts dramatic adverse impacts on mammalian health…I have reduced refined sugar intake and encouraged my family to do the same.”142

This study was unique in that sugar levels were made equal to that of the recommended human intake. At the very least, says Professor Potts, “If it makes a mouse sick, then do you want it in your body? At least before we work out the mechanistic basis of that sickness and are able to evaluate whether it's also going on in humans or if it's a mouse-specific phenomenon.”143 Most previous studies provided only partial data because the mice were fed either smaller or larger amounts of sugars in proportion to their human counterparts. “The study contrasts with previous research work that involved feeding mice exceedingly large quantities of sugar disproportionate to levels seen in human diets.”144

If the results correlate accurately, then imagine women dying twice as fast as normal and overall reproduction a mere 25% of current rates. One need only imagine the long-term consequences for the human race.

The added sugars in soft drinks, candies, and baked goods, it seems, do a lot more than cause cavities. While further research is needed, the University of Utah study should act as a harbinger for human fortune and health. It is time to dramatically reduce the sugar we put into our bodies on a daily basis. If the amount of sugars in three soft drinks a day can do such dramatic harm to mice (mammals) the how far off is it from human mammals? The point is not to answer the question necessary with precision, but to head its implicit warnings.

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 25

Sugar is not “toxic” to humans"Mice do not eat sugar as a part of their normal diet, so the authors are measuring a contrived overload effect that might not

be present had the rodents adapted to sugar intake over time.”—The Corn Refiners Association145

Of course we should all reduce our intake of sugar. This is something we have been told since childhood. However, the so-called “sugar study” by the University of Utah is more than just a misnomer. The authors deliberately misrepresent the study and its possible application to human health. Not only is the study insufficient to explain human health, it carries a host of flawed assumptions and testing procedures.

Sugar is consumed by millions of Americans daily in safe doses. Sure, the “Big Gulp” exceeds healthy levels, but not all Americans drink them. In fact, the study admits that only 13-25% of Americans approach the 25% daily allowance level. Moreover, this has become another inaccurate portrayal carried by the media. According to Andrew Briscoe III, President and CEO of the Sugar Association, these media reports have consistently misrepresented other sugar studies and the distinction between natural sugar and added sugars. Rather than educating the public with accurate information, the media has created “confusion about food” that “is constantly fueled by extremists who sensationalize each and every new piece of research and distort the facts about sugar for the sake of a catchy headline or controversial story.”146

But the distinction between all-natural sugar and added sugars is crucial. The study utilized a combination of fructose and glucose monosaccharides at ratios found in HFCS, or high fructose corn syrup.147 “HFCS lacks this bond and consequently contains free fructose. Sugar and the various formulations of HFCS are molecularly different—they are not the same product yet too often, and erroneously, HFCS is referred to as an ‘added sugar.’ Only sugar is sugar.”148

The study is also ripe with internal inconsistencies and mistakes. First, stress of the tests and the possibility of pre-existing conditions of the wild mice could explain the widespread death of females, according to Walter Willett, Chair of the Department of Nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health.149 Even Dr. James Ruff, one of the study’s lead authors admitted that the researchers could not collect the dead females often enough to study their cause of death, otherwise it would disturb the experiment.150 Also, researchers cannot explain the discrepancy between male and female mice results.151

But most importantly, the authors misrepresent their results as being directly applicable to human health. Nutrition researcher Barry Popkin, a nutrition researcher at the University of North Carolina argued that “The way mice react to sweetness and sugar is different than humans.”152 There is no direct correlation between the health of mice and that of humans. The authors refer to the similarity for mammalian health. But that is like saying what hurts a blue whale applies to humans—we’re both mammals!

Despite their attempts to model the human diet, Anna Donald and Vivek Muthu, founders of Bazian and clinicians at the British Medical Journal argue that it was not successful. “Even though sugar levels were intended to model those consumed by humans, mice are not humans. It cannot be concluded that these mice are a direct model of human life with added dietary sugar.”153

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 26

The U.S. should declare a policy “no first use”“The other issue is nuclear war. It's been known for a long time that if there were to be a first strike by a major power, even

with no retaliation, it would probably destroy civilization just because of the nuclear-winter consequences that would follow.”—Noam Chomsky, Professor Emeritus at MIT154

Whenever the general public thinks about nuclear weapons, it usually becomes a question of “should we keep them or disarm?” However, policymakers take a much more nuanced approach. The current administration focuses on the gradual reduction of our stockpiles in conjunction with Russia.155 However, it matters little how many we have but the circumstances in which even one might be used. Obama made a pledge upon entering office that he would declare a nuclear “no first use” policy. Yet no movement has been made in that direction.156

A nuclear “no first use” policy is a pledge by a government that it will not use its nuclear weapons in a preemptive manor (“first strike”). The only circumstances in which a nuclear power would launch their weapons is if they were attacked by another power using nuclear weapons. “If we truly believe that no country should initiate a nuclear attack, why don't we take a lead by making this our policy? It does not constrain us from responding to any attack.”157

The United States is falling behind in this respect as China and India158 lead the way. While maintaining a credible deterrent, China has seen what nuclear brinksmanship has done to relations between the U.S. and Russia. Nuclear deterrence is expensive and dangerous.159 Because it did not explicitly mention its “no first use” policy in a recent White Paper, some have claimed that China is changing course. However, Gregory Kulacki, senior analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists, argues that there is no real “significance in the fact that it is not mentioned in the white paper.”160 And while Pakistan abstains, India has a “no first use” policy.161

Yet, current U.S. policy remains locked in deterrence. Even as Obama seeks reduction in stockpiles, the U.S. relies on deterrence and the threat of a massive first strike.162 This failed policy has not prevented nuclear proliferation in Iran or Pakistan.163 Michael S. Gerson of the Center for Naval Analyses explains that a nuclear first strike is no guarantee. “The United States can never be absolutely confident in its ability to fully neutralize the nuclear threat in a disarming first strike, and the possibility that even one or two nuclear weapons could survive and be used in retaliation against the U.S. homeland or on U.S. allies should temper proposals for a first strike.”164

Much of the supposed benefits of a first strike policy could be achieved by our overwhelming conventional superiority. The dangers of sticking with the current path could be catastrophic in times of crisis. There is always the chance of miscommunication or misperception causing an accidental or unauthorized launch.165

Instead, the United States should declare a nuclear policy of “no first use”. Not only will the nuclear threat of retaliation remain, should the U.S. be attacked, but we will gain a much-needed boost in non-proliferation leadership. Because other major nuclear powers, such as China and India, have already declared their policies, this is a perfect time for healthy American leadership.

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 27

The U.S. should not declare a policy “no first use”“Of all the elements of the nuclear enterprise, I'm most concerned with the potential for declining or inadequate investment in

the nuclear-weapons enterprise itself; some declining investment that would result in our inability to sustain the deterrent force.”—Gen. Robert Kehler, head of the Omaha-based U.S. Strategic Command166

We all know that a nuclear-free world will not happen overnight, so it is reasonable for many to call for policies that might reduce the likelihood of nuclear weapons. However, a nuclear “no first use” policy actually increases the chances of nuclear disaster. “No first use” undermines deterrence, which is essential to our overall military effectiveness167 in preventing the outbreak of major conflicts and maintain the security confidence of allies.

Operating under the layer triad forces for security, the U.S. military relies on the threat of first strikes to maintain the perception of superiority and discourages nuclear adventurism. “Put simply, the possibility of a nuclear strike creates disincentives for all states, regardless of their relative conventional military power, to launch an attack. Invoking an NFU policy lessens this possibility and, consequently, attenuates the disincentives for war-risking measures for all states.”168

Moreover, adopting a policy of “no first use” would erode the safety and security of our allies. The first strike option is an essential component to such extended deterrence guarantees.169 Japan is a prime example. Successive governments in Japan, for example, have repeatedly stressed that without the extended deterrence, they would be forced to develop their own arsenal. Maintaining current policy risks clear military escalation should conflict erupt.

A “no first use” policy could also embolden our enemies who perceive a potential weakness. It could also be used as an excuse to close of the experience and gap between the U.S and other countries by seeking to develop weapons of their own. “The first use of nuclear weapons is unnecessary or irrelevant to defeat threats to the territory of the United States today. However, some U.S. allies face potential threats that they rely on the United States to deter, including via possible first use of nuclear weapons.”170

Some advocates of a “no first use” policy argue that the threat of conventional forces alone would deter the threat of a nuclear-armed adversary from employing those weapons. However, Alexander Lanoszka and Thomas Leo Scherer of Princeton University call this logically inconsistent with the results of their study. “We find many recent arguments in favor of NFU unconvincing…Specifically, the contention that American conventional weapons are great enough to render nuclear weapons pointless and that American threats to use nuclear weapons are not credible contradicts the general conclusion that NFU would make the world a safer place.”171

Much has been made of the potential for larger acceptance if the U.S. showed leadership by declaring a nuclear “no first use” policy. Yet current states with a NFU either illustrate the lack of potential for change or the outright reversal of their stance. Although India has declared a NFU, its main rival Pakistan has not. Moreover, China is reversing its policy on NFU. A recent military white paper omitted the claim that it will never use nuclear weapons first. “That explicit pledge had been the cornerstone of Beijing’s stated nuclear policy for the last half-century. The white paper, however, introduces ambiguity.”172 In such a climate, this is a bad time to gut American nuclear deterrence.

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 28

Alcohol Sales Should be Not Allowed on Native American Lands

The issue of drinking is one that seems to polarize people on one side or the other. Some view it as harmless social engagement while others view it as a main source of societal problems from which nothing good can come. With all of the damage and mayhem caused by drinking around the world every year it is not difficult to understand this latter position. These issues impact the United States on a daily basis but they impact Native American reservations even more than the rest of the country. Things work differently for Native American reservations. US organizations are banned from selling alcohol to Native lands unless the groups vote to allow it.173 Specifically, Pine Ridge reservation in South Dakota is one of the largest in the country. It is also a community that has chosen to outlaw alcohol possession, sale, and consumption within their jurisdiction. However, they have also just voted to make these activities legal within their land. “"Life will change now as we know it," … "This is a new era we're in. We've got to remember now we lived dry for 100 years and it was proven that prohibition didn't work. We're in new territory now."”174 Unfortunately, this reverses a productive hardline stance the reservation had recently taken. Alcohol sales should not be allowed on Native lands for several reasons.

First, drinking is an epidemic in the Native American community. Hardline stances must be taken as this has begun to impact children on reservations. “… children on the South Dakota reservation often have their very first drink at the age of five or six, … Ask how they got that drink, …, and the children respond with answers like, “Well, I had leftovers. It was in the bottle. It was on the table.”175 The children learn these behaviors from adults who are locked in a destructive cycle of alcoholism. “… a man idling near the stores said he had been drinking and sleeping in Whiteclay since the fall… Two mattresses, one belonging to Pokey, the other to his uncle, provide inches of protection from the brutal December cold. "We're here because we drink," ….”176

Second, alcoholism must be rejected in Native lands because it encourages alcohol fetal syndrome. “Fetal alcohol syndrome, …, affects all racial groups, but American Indians are hardest hit. … fetal alcohol damage is a huge problem in some tribal communities. There's a growing effort to fight a problem that, for years, has been ignored or misunderstood.”177 This damaging disorder must be combated. Fetal alcohol syndrome impact children’s physical appearance, their mental development, and their overall health.178 While it is true that instances of this disorder occur in the status quo the chances of it occurring are even higher when alcohol consumption is legalized and the drinks flow freely closer to home.

Third, alcohol consumption on Native land contributes to extreme poverty. “At a time when there’s a spotlight on America’s richest 1%, a look at the country’s 310 Indian reservations–where many of America’s poorest 1% live–can be more enlightening. To explain the poverty of the reservations, people usually point to alcoholism,…”179 Certainly, there are other factors that contribute to Native poverty and there is even dispute that alcoholism is even the main cause but there is sufficient evidence to show it is at the very least a contributing factor. Poverty is unjust. What Native communities want more than anything is justice. Some are calling for a more just relation to their land as their people are being negatively impacted. “… we are also the ones who must save ourselves."¶ The Oglala Sioux Tribe doesn't want pity. It just wants the brewers, distributors and retailers supplying beer in Whiteclay to stop sabotaging its fight for recovery.”180

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 29

Alcohol Sales Should be Allowed on Native American Lands

It seems no matter what the social problem is there are groups who will advocate for and attempt to use the law to solve said problem. However, some problems are not codified in law or, even if they are, are far too complex and multifaceted to solve by passing a simple piece of legislation. One such social problem is that of alcoholism on Native reservations. The argument proponents of banning alcohol on Native reservations issue is that if drinking is legal than the Natives will drink. However, this ignores the fact that drinking occurs now despite the law. If drinking is going to occur regardless of the law and indeed the law does not even change the amount of drinking that occurs the only relevant question becomes is there some value that can be gained in allowing the sale of alcohol? Alcohol sales should be allowed on Native American lands for several reasons.

First, making alcohol sales on Native lands illegal is pointless given that any interested party of legal age can usually drive a couple of miles down the road and purchase alcohol in neighboring towns not on the reservation. “… the sale and consumption of alcohol is prohibited.¶ But just outside the reservation, in the bordering town …alcohol is legal. Though only fourteen people live in this neighboring town, each year 4 million cans of beer are sold. … about 90 percent of their customers come from the reservation.”181 It is true that there is supposed to be a 10 mile buffer around Native reservations where alcohol is not to be sold but this is typically not enforced. Despite what some are concerned about this will not be a free for all situation. The government will work with the reservation to make sure the transition is smooth and that oversight, training, and logistical support is present. 182 Further, creating a legal means for alcohol sales on Native lands has a laundry list of benefits that prohibition cannot capture. “…legalization of alcohol sales on reservation could increase revenue, thereby creating more opportunities on the reservation. …, legalization would relieve the strain on the community’s law enforcement by reducing the need to go after alcohol-related offenses like possession, allowing them to focus on crimes that take place on the reservation.”183 Selling alcohol on Native lands could also help solve many of the problem people contend alcohol creates. Legalizing it would mean Natives would own the stores, collect the profits, and reap the benefits instead of only the ill effects.184 There is very little funding to alcohol treatment and prevention centers on Native lands now. Using alcohol profits for these efforts could add benefits to the community.185

Second, it often is said that alcoholism the main problem facing the Native community. However, the problem on most reservations is not alcoholism but a lack of property rights. “…alcoholism, …just symptoms. Prosperity is built on property rights, and reservations often have neither. … If everyone owns the land, no one does. So the result is substandard housing and the barren, rundown look that comes from a lack of investment,…”186 Indeed, poverty is the major problem in Native communities but it is weak property rights that cause poverty on Native lands. “…, nearly all economists agree that two ingredients are crucial—secure property rights and a stable rule of law… By comparing reservation economies with and without these institutions, we can get a sense of their importance.”187

Third, part of the reason to allow alcohol sales on Native land is because of the message it sends not to allow it. Why is it that the United States has banned the sale of alcohol to all Native reservations unless those tribes expressly vote to allow it? Why are Natives held as a special category? The myth that is perpetuated by placing Natives in this special protected category is that they cannot be allowed to consume any alcohol or they will simply run wild. This is a particularly paternalistic way to relate to Natives. This idea should be rejected as it promotes a biologically stereotypical view of Natives that,

West Coast Publishing NewsViews Feb 27, 2014 Page 30

while in theory is meant to protect Natives, actually results in them being viewed as less than other people living on this continent.188

1 Reuters India. January 24, 2014. “BJP to be biggest party in 2014 election: opinion polls.” ACCESSED 2/8/2014. http://www.ndtv.com/article/election-2014/bjp-to-be-biggest-party-in-2014-election-opinion-polls-4748902 Zee News. January 24, 2014. “BJP may make major gains in UP, AAP in Delhi: Survey.” ACCESSED 2/7/2014. http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/bjp-may-make-major-gains-in-up-aap-in-delhi-survey_906375.html3 India Today Online. January 24, 2014. “BJP's rise and Congress' demise in Haryana: India Today Group-CVoter Mood of the Nation.” ACCESSED 2/8/2014. http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/bjps-rise-and-congress-demise-in-haryana-india-today-group-cvoter-mood-of-the-nation/1/339644.html4 Press Trust of India. January 27, 2014. “Modi factor propels rise of BJP, RSS in Bengal.” ACCESSED 2/8/2014. http://www.business-standard.com/article/politics/modi-factor-propels-rise-of-bjp-rss-in-bengal-114012700160_1.html5 India Today Online. January 27, 2014. “Modi wave reaches Mamata's Bengal, BJP membership jumps to 7 lakh.” ACCESSED 2/8/2014. http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/modi-reaches-mamata-bengal-bjp-membership-7-lakh-2014-lok-sabha-polls/1/340075.html6 Pallavi Sengupta. Writer at One India. January 29, 2014. “Modi's charisma reaches Bengal, party membership jumps to 7 lakh.” ACCESSED 2/8/2014. http://news.oneindia.in/india/modi-charisma-reaches-bengal-party-membership-jumps-to-7-lakh-1385523.html7 Shubhankar Patra. Writer at Idolbin. January 27, 2014. “The Modi Model.” ACCESSED 2/7/2014. http://www.idolbin.com/shares?q=Abhijit+Mukherjee&page=2&token=0&until=13908455918 MJ Akbar. Writer at Khaleej Times. January 10, 2014. “Bengal’s political calculus.” ACCESSED 2/8/2014. http://www.khaleejtimes.com/kt-article-display-1.asp?xfile=data/opinion/2014/February/opinion_February18.xml&section=opinion9 Planning Commission of India. October, 2013. “Faster, sustainable and more inclusive growth.” ACCESSED 2/8/2014. http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/12appdrft/appraoch_12plan.pdf10 Times of India Online. February 10, 2014. “Modi needs to come up with concrete proposals on how he can restore high growth.” ACCESSED 2/8/2014. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/opinion/edit-page/Modi-needs-to-come-up-with-concrete-proposals-on-how-he-can-restore-high-growth/articleshow/30121281.cms11 Sharang Limaye, Rakteem Katakey and Siddharth Philip. Writers at Bloomberg News. January 14, 2014. “Rise of 'Common Man' in India Threatens Stability of Government Coalition.” ACCESSED 2/7/2014. http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-01-13/rise-of-common-man-in-india-threatens-stability-of-government-coalition12 Sheila Dikshit. Writer at Economic Times. December 28, 2013. “Satyendra Kumar Jain: Architect-turned-minister.” ACCESSED 2/8/2014. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-28/news/45653213_1_aam-aadmi-party-manish-sisodia-arvind-kejriwal13 BBC News. February 9, 2014. “India's awakening youth threaten political status quo.” ACCESSED 2/7/2014. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-2606448514 Sruthi Gottipati and Mike Collectt-White. Writers at Reuters. December 9, 2013. “Congress stumbles as opponent Modi marches on.” ACCESSED 2/8/2014. http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/12/09/india-elections-congress-narendramodi-idINDEE9B80042013120915 Milan Vaishnav and Ila Patnaik. Research Fellows at the Carnegie Endowment. February 4, 2014. “Will India’s Economy Surge After the General Election?” ACCESSED 2/9/2014. http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/02/04/will-india-s-economy-surge-after-general-election/h02y16 Philip Seib. Professor at USC Public Diplomacy. February 7, 2014. “Putting a hard edge on India.” ACCESSED 2/8/2014. http://qna.economictimes.indiatimes.com/?ref=dashboard&uid=22728&page=217 Shawn Boburg, staffwriter for NorthJersey.com, January 8, 2014, "Christie Stuck in a Jam over GWB Lane Closings," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.northjersey.com/news/christie_kelly_bridge_lane_closures_emails.html?page=all18 Darryl Isherwood, Senior Political Reporter for http://NJ.com, January 9, 2014, "10 things you absolutely need to know about the George Washington Bridge scandal," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/01/10_things_you_absolutely_need_to_know_about_the_george_washington_bridge_scandal.html19 Angela Deli Santi, Associated Press reporter, January 10, 2014, "Bridget Anne Kelly, fired Christie aide, was on team from the start," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2014/0110/Bridget-Anne-Kelly-fired-Christie-aide-was-on-team-from-the-start20 Darryl Isherwood, Senior Political Reporter for http://NJ.com, January 9, 2014, "10 things you absolutely need to know about the George Washington Bridge scandal," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/01/10_things_you_absolutely_need_to_know_about_the_george_washington_bridge_scandal.html21 Jen Chung, contributing writer for the Gothamist, February 9, 2014, "Star Ledger Now Really Regrets Endorsing Chris Christie," accessed 2/9/2014, http://gothamist.com/2014/02/09/star-ledger_now_really_regrets_endo.php

22 Susan K. Livio, reporter at The Star-Ledger, February 7, 2014, "GWB motorists and anti-Chris Christie groups to hold protest Tuesday," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/02/gwb_motorists_and_anti-chris_christie_groups_to_hold_protest_tuesday.html23 Taegan D. Goddard, founder of Political Wire, February 8, 2014, "The scandals swirling around Chris Christie aren't going away anytime soon," accessed 2/9/2014, http://theweek.com/article/index/256211/the-scandals-swirling-around-chris-christie-arent-going-away-anytime-soon24 Joseph Tanfani, DC reporter for Los Angeles Times, February 10, 2014, "More subpoenas in Chris Christie case as helicopter travel is probed," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-chris-christie-bridge-subpoenas-20140210,0,5434462.story#ixzz2syUx4ET425 Steve Benen, Producer of the Rachel Maddow Show, February 7, 2014, "Christie's evolving version of events," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/christies-evolving-version-events26 Mark Mueller, projects and investigative reporter for The Star-Ledger, February 7, 2014, “Bridge Scandal Claim that Christie Didn’t Know Fort Lee Mayor Contradicted by 2010 Luncheon,” accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/02/bridge_scandal_claim_that_christie_didnt_know_fort_lee_mayor_contradicted_by_2010_luncheon.html27 Angela Delli Santi and Geoff Mulvihill, reporters for the Associated Press, February 9, 2014, "Chris Christie Scandal May Hurt His Ability to Push Agenda," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/09/chris-christie-scandal_n_4756016.html?utm_hp_ref=new-york&ir=New+York28 Brent Johnson, reporter for the Star Ledger, February 5, 2014, "Chris Christie's 2016 prospects drop amid allegations, new poll shows," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/02/chris_christies_2016_prospects_drop_in_new_poll.html29 Michael Barbaro, Political reporter for The New York Times; Nicholas Confessore, National Desk of The New York Times, and Jonathan Martin, political correspondent for New York Times, February 5, 2014, "Democrats Grab for a Chance to Halt Christie’s Rise," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/06/us/politics/democrats-aim-to-capitalize-on-christie-problems.html?_r=030 Michael Barbaro, Political reporter for The New York Times; Nicholas Confessore, National Desk of The New York Times, and Jonathan Martin, political correspondent for New York Times, February 5, 2014, "Democrats Grab for a Chance to Halt Christie’s Rise," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/06/us/politics/democrats-aim-to-capitalize-on-christie-problems.html?_r=031 Taegan D. Goddard, founder of Political Wire, February 8, 2014, "The scandals swirling around Chris Christie aren't going away anytime soon," accessed 2/9/2014, http://theweek.com/article/index/256211/the-scandals-swirling-around-chris-christie-arent-going-away-anytime-soon32 Joshua Spivak, senior fellow at the Hugh L. Carey Institute for Government Reform at Wagner College and founder of the Recall Elections Blog, January 27, 2014, "Why New Jersey Won't Recall Chris Christie," accessed 2/9/2014, http://theweek.com/article/index/255579/why-new-jersey-wont-recall-chris-christie33 Joshua Spivak, senior fellow at the Hugh L. Carey Institute for Government Reform at Wagner College and founder of the Recall Elections Blog, January 27, 2014, "Why New Jersey Won't Recall Chris Christie," accessed 2/9/2014, http://theweek.com/article/index/255579/why-new-jersey-wont-recall-chris-christie34 Chris Cillizza, managing editor of PostPolitics, January 31, 2014, "Live Q&As," accessed 2/9/2014, http://live.washingtonpost.com/live-fix-140131.html?tid=hpModule_9d3add6c-8a79-11e2-98d9-3012c1cd8d1e35 Taegan D. Goddard, founder of Political Wire, February 8, 2014, "The scandals swirling around Chris Christie aren't going away anytime soon," accessed 2/9/2014, http://theweek.com/article/index/256211/the-scandals-swirling-around-chris-christie-arent-going-away-anytime-soon36 Linda Feldman, staff writer for D.C. Decoder, February 3, 2014, "Bridge-gate: Why conservatives are now embracing Chris Christie," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/2014/0203/Bridge-gate-Why-conservatives-are-now-embracing-Chris-Christie-video37 Tal Kopan, news reporter for Politico, February 7, 2014, "David Axelrod: Chris Christie scandal led to CPAC invite," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/chris-christie-cpac-invitation-david-axelrod-103250.html38 Linda Feldman, staff writer for D.C. Decoder, January 30, 2014, "Chris Christie's National Popularity Tanks, but Poll Shows Room to Recover," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/2014/0130/Chris-Christie-s-national-popularity-tanks-but-poll-shows-room-to-recover39 Linda Feldman, staff writer for D.C. Decoder, January 30, 2014, "Chris Christie's National Popularity Tanks, but Poll Shows Room to Recover," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/2014/0130/Chris-Christie-s-national-popularity-tanks-but-poll-shows-room-to-recover40 Robert Costa, National Political Reporter for the Washington Post, January 15, 2014, "Christie, aides plan comeback campaign after bridge flap," accessed 2/9/2014, http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/christie-aides-plan-comeback-campaign-after-bridge-flap/2014/01/15/78aa0ddc-7e08-11e3-9556-4a4bf7bcbd84_story.html41 Chris Freind, Owner of Friendly Fire Zone News Media, January 23, 2014, "Grit Will Help Christie's Comeback," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.newsmax.com/Freind/Christie-Comeback-Washington-Bridge/2014/01/23/id/

54864142 Trip Gabriel, New York Times national correspondent covering DC & mid-Atlantic states, January 10, 2014,"Thousands without Water after Spill in West Virginia," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/11/us/west-virginia-chemical-spill.html?_r=043 National Public Radio, January 29, 2014, "How Industrial Chemical Regulation Failed West Virginia," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.npr.org/2014/01/29/268201454/how-industrial-chemical-regulation-failed-west-virginia44 Lydia Nuzum, Reporter for West Virginia Gazette, February 4, 2014, "Some Businesses Beneffited from Water Crisis," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.wvgazette.com/News/20140131018345 John Bacon, Deputy Rewrite Chief at USA Today, February 10, 2014, "One month later, experts hedge on W.Va. water safety," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/02/10/west-virginia-water-hearing/5362353/46 Emily Atkin, reporter for Climate Progress at Center for American Progress, January 19, 2014, "Chemically-Related Hospital Admissions in West Virginia Have Doubled Since Water Deemed Safe," accessed 2/10/2014, http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/01/19/3183631/chemical-related-hospital-admissions-west-virginia-doubled-water-deemed-safe/.47 John Bacon, Deputy Rewrite Chief at USA Today, February 10, 2014, "One month later, experts hedge on W.Va. water safety," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/02/10/west-virginia-water-hearing/5362353/48 Clare Foran, energy reporter at National Journal, February 10, 2014, "Students Sent Home From West Virginia Schools Amid Fears Over Water Contamination," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.nationaljournal.com/energy/students-sent-home-from-west-virginia-schools-amid-fears-over-water-contamination-2014021049 Terrell Johnson, Editor at The Weather Channel, January 23, 2014, "Surprise Disclosure: Another Toxic Chemical May Have Spilled Into West Virginia Water," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.weather.com/news/science/environment/surprise-disclosure-another-toxic-chemical-spilled-wv-river-2014012350 Lindsay Abrams, assistant editor on sustainability issues at Salon, February 10, 2014, "The company responsible for West Virginia’s chemical spill didn’t bother to show up to the congressional hearing," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.salon.com/2014/02/10/the_company_responsible_for_west_virginias_chemical_spill_didnt_bother_to_show_up_to_the_congressional_hearing/51 Alexandra Berzon, Staffwriter for Wall Street Journal, February 4, 2014, "West Virginia Spill Points to Lack of Data on Threats to Water Supply," accessed 2/10/2014, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304851104579361223250977790?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304851104579361223250977790.html52 Alexandra Berzon, Staffwriter for Wall Street Journal, February 4, 2014, "West Virginia Spill Points to Lack of Data on Threats to Water Supply," accessed 2/10/2014, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304851104579361223250977790?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304851104579361223250977790.html53 Alexandra Berzon, Staffwriter for Wall Street Journal, February 4, 2014, "West Virginia Spill Points to Lack of Data on Threats to Water Supply," accessed 2/10/2014, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304851104579361223250977790?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304851104579361223250977790.html54 Jeff Biggers, author of The United States of Appalachia, January 31, 2014, "If we don't put people before profits, spills like West Virginia are our future," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/31/west-virginia-coal-chemical-spill-impact55 Ana Marie Cox, columnist for The Guardian, January 13, 2014, "That West Virginia chemical spill? It's likely a bigger scandal than Bridgegate," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/13/west-virginia-chemical-spill-versus-bridgegate56 Ana Marie Cox, columnist for The Guardian, January 13, 2014, "That West Virginia chemical spill? It's likely a bigger scandal than Bridgegate," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/13/west-virginia-chemical-spill-versus-bridgegate57 Jeff Biggers, author of The United States of Appalachia, January 31, 2014, "If we don't put people before profits, spills like West Virginia are our future," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/31/west-virginia-coal-chemical-spill-impact58 Reuters, January 20, 2014, "West Virginia looks to tighten rules after chemical spill contaminated water," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/20/us-usa-westvirginia-spill-idUSBREA0I00V2014012059 National Science Foundation, January 30, 2014, "NSF awards rapid response grants to study West Virginia chemical spill," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=130304

60 John Bacon, Deputy Rewrite Chief at USA Today, February 10, 2014, "One month later, experts hedge on W.Va. water safety," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/02/10/west-virginia-water-hearing/5362353/61 Bebe Raupe, Staff Correspondent at Bloomberg News, February 6, 2014, "Water Safe to Drink, Governor Tells West Virginians Affected by Spill," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-06/water-safe-to-drink-governor-tells-west-virginians-affected-by-spill.html62 Crystal Wylie, Register News Writer, January 30, 2014, "Berea College Students Taking Water to West Virginia," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.richmondregister.com/localnews/x1724069747/Berea-College-students-taking-water-to-West-Virginia63 Ryan Pennington, firefighter/paramedic for the Charleston, West Virginia Fire Department, January 16, 2014, "Pennington: Water Crisis Brings Out West Virginia Pride," accesseed 2/10/2014, http://www.firehouse.com/blog/11295565/firefighters-responders-held-during-west-virginia-water-emergency64 Ryan Pennington, firefighter/paramedic for the Charleston, West Virginia Fire Department, January 16, 2014, "Pennington: Water Crisis Brings Out West Virginia Pride," accesseed 2/10/2014, http://www.firehouse.com/blog/11295565/firefighters-responders-held-during-west-virginia-water-emergency65 WOWK Television, February 4, 2014, "WV American Water will increase credit for small businesses," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.wowktv.com/story/24628490/wv-american-water-will-increase-credit-for-small-businesses66 Chris Lawrence, Metro News Reporter, February 12, 2014, "WVAWC president answers questions on MetroNews Talkline," accessed 2/12/2014, http://wvmetronews.com/2014/02/12/wvawc-president-answers-questions-on-metronews-talkline/67 Drew Griffin, David Fitzpatrick and Patricia DiCarlo, reporters for CNN, 2/4/2014, "Federal grand jury investigates West Virginia chemical spill," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/04/justice/west-virginia-chemical-spill-grand-jury/68 Bebe Raupe, Staff Correspondent at Bloomberg News, February 6, 2014, "Water Safe to Drink, Governor Tells West Virginians Affected by Spill," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-06/water-safe-to-drink-governor-tells-west-virginians-affected-by-spill.html69 Reuters, January 20, 2014, "West Virginia looks to tighten rules after chemical spill contaminated water," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/20/us-usa-westvirginia-spill-idUSBREA0I00V2014012070 National Science Foundation, January 30, 2014, "NSF awards rapid response grants to study West Virginia chemical spill," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=13030471 Reuters, January 28, 2014, "Senators Introduce Chemical Safety And Drinking Water Protection Act In Response To West Virginia Spill," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/28/chemical-safety-drinking-water-protection-act_n_4681420.html72 Kate White and Dave Gutman, reporters for the Charleston Gazette, January 18, 2014, "Freedom Industries Files for Bankruptcy," accessed 2/10/2014, http://www.wvgazette.com/News/20140117003073 Kim Keating, Founder and managing director, Keating Advisors, January 31, 2014,

“Obama's Shout-Out to the Ladies: The Policies Behind His Words,” Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kim-keating/obamas-shout-out-to-the-l_b_4704313.html, Accessed 2/5/2014

74 Nia-Malika Henderson, a senior writer for She The People, January 29, 2014, “Obama, Democrats put spotlight on gender pay gap. Will it matter?,” Washington Post,

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2014/01/29/obama-democrats-put-spotlight-on-gender-pay-gap-will-it-

matter/, Accessed 2/4/2014

75 Carina Kolodny, Staff Writer, January 24, 2014, “5 Myths About The Gender Wage Gap Debunked,” The

Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/24/equal-pay-for-equal-work-benefits_n_4646022.html, Accessed 2/2/2014

76 Claudia Goldin, Professor of Economics at Harvard University, January 21, 2014, “Close the Gender Pay Gap, Change the Way We Work,” Bloomberg News,

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-21/close-the-

77 Carina Kolodny, Staff Writer, January 24, 2014, “5 Myths About The Gender Wage Gap Debunked,” The

Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/24/equal-pay-for-equal-work-benefits_n_4646022.html, Accessed 2/2/2014

78 Emily Werth, Fellow at the National Women's Law Center, January 29, 2014, “Five Years After the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act - Honoring a Law That Has Worked,” National Women's Law Center, http://www.nwlc.org/our-blog/five-years-after-lilly-ledbetter-fair-pay-act-honoring-law-has-worked, Accessed 2/4/2014

79 Lilly Ledbetter, plaintiff in Ledbetter v. Goodyear and the namesake of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Linda D. Hallman, CAE , executive director and CEO of the American Association of University Women, January 28, 2014, “Equal Pay For Equal Work: We Shall Overcome,” Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeswomanfiles/2014/01/28/equal-pay-for-equal-work-we-shall-overcome/, Accessed 2/4/2014

80 National Women’s Law Center, 2013, “50 years & counting: the unfinished business of achieving fair pay,”

http://www.nwlc.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/final_nwlc_equal_pay_report.pdf, Accessed 2/4/2014

81 Lilly Ledbetter, plaintiff in Ledbetter v. Goodyear and the namesake of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Deborah J. Vagins, senior legislative counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union’s Washington Legislative Office and co-chairwoman of the Paycheck Fairness Act Coalition, January 31, 2014, “Fulfilling the Promise of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act,” Roll Call, http://www.rollcall.com/news/fulfilling_the_promise_of_the_lilly_ ledbetter_ fair_pay_act_commentary-230574-1.html, Accessed 2/4/2014

82 National Women’s Law Center, 2013, “50 years & counting: the unfinished business of achieving fair pay,”

http://www.nwlc.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/final_nwlc_equal_pay_report.pdf, Accessed 2/4/2014

83 Juliet Lapidos, Staff Writer, January 30, 2014, “Equality as Handout,” New York Times, Accessed 2/5/2014,

http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/01/30/equality-as-handout/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

84 Carina Kolodny, Staff Writer, January 24, 2014, “5 Myths About The Gender Wage Gap Debunked,” The

Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/24/equal-pay-for-equal-work-benefits_n_4646022.html, Accessed 2/2/2014

85 National Women’s Law Center, 2013, “50 years & counting: the unfinished business of achieving fair pay,”

http://www.nwlc.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/final_nwlc_equal_pay_report.pdf, Accessed 2/4/2014

86 Lilly Ledbetter, plaintiff in Ledbetter v. Goodyear and the namesake of the Lilly

Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Linda D. Hallman, CAE , executive director and CEO of the American Association of University Women, January 28, 2014, “Equal Pay For Equal Work: We Shall Overcome,” Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeswomanfiles/2014/01/28/equal-pay-for-equal-work-we-shall-overcome/, Accessed 2/4/2014

87 Nia-Malika Henderson, a senior writer for She The People, January 29, 2014, “Obama, Democrats put spotlight on gender pay gap. Will it matter?,” Washington Post,

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2014/01/29/obama-democrats-put-spotlight-on-gender-pay-gap-will-it-

matter/, Accessed 2/4/2014

88 Kimberly Morin, Staff Writer, January 23, 2014, “Democrats' ‘Paycheck Fairness Act’ will set women back

decades,” The Examiner, http://www.examiner.com/article/democrat-s-paycheck-fairness-act-will-set-women-back-decades, Accessed 2/4/2014

89 Martha Burk, Money Editor, Ms. magazine; director, Corporate Accountability Project, National Council of Women's Organizations, January 15, 2014, “Obama Should Stop Talking and Start Acting on Equal Pay,” Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/martha-burk/obama-should-stoptalking_b_4603501.html, Accessed 2/4/2014

90 Christina Hoff Summers, Columnist, February 1, 2014, “No, Women Don’t Make Less Money Than Men,”

The Daily Beast, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/01/no-women-don-t-make-less-money-than-men.html, Accessed 2/4/2014

91 Lisa Belkin, Staff Writer, December 11, 2013, “Millennial Women Are Closing The Wage Gap With Men (For

Now),” The Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/11/millennial-women-wage-gap_n_4424939.html, Accessed 2/5/2014

92 Emily Goff and James Sherk, Analysts at the Heritage Foundation, October 18, 2012, “Debate Analysis: Women's Pay Statistics Misleading,” The Foundry, http://blog.heritage.org/2012/10/18/debate-analysis-womens-pay-statistics-misleading/, Accessed 2/4/2014

93 Genevieve Wood, Analyst at the Heritage Foundation, January 17, 2014, “Gender Equality Isn’t a Myth. But the Wage Gap Is,” The Foundry, http://blog.heritage.org/2014/01/17/gender-equality-isnt-myth-wage-gap/, Accessed 2/4/2014

94 Emily Goff and James Sherk, Analysts at the Heritage Foundation, October 18, 2012, “Debate Analysis: Women's Pay Statistics Misleading,” The Foundry, http://blog.heritage.org/2012/10/18/debate-analysis-womens-pay-statistics-misleading/, Accessed 2/4/2014

95 Kimberly Morin, Staff Writer, January 23, 2014, “Democrats' ‘Paycheck Fairness Act’ will set women back

decades,” The Examiner, http://www.examiner.com/article/democrat-s-paycheck-fairness-act-will-set-women-back-decades, Accessed 2/4/2014

96 U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General, January 27, 2014, “Providing Non-Bank Financial Services for the Underserved,” http://www.uspsoig.gov/sites/default/files/document-

library-files/2014/rarc-wp-14-007.pdf, Accessed 2/5/2014

97 Kyle Bisio, Staff Writer, February 4, 2014, “Using the USPS as a financial service could create revenue and help the

poor,” The Examiner, http://www.examiner.com/article/using-the-usps-as-a-financial-service-could-create-revenue-and-help-the-poor, Accessed 2/5/2014

98 Joshua Brustein, Staff Writer, February 03, 2014, “Would the U.S. Postal Service Make a Better Banker for the

Poor?,” Bloomberg Businessweek, http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-02-03/would-u-dot-s-dot-post-office-make-a-better-banker-for-the-poor, Accessed 2/5/2014

99 Kyle Bisio, Staff Writer, February 4, 2014, “Using the USPS as a financial service could create revenue and help the

poor,” The Examiner, http://www.examiner.com/article/using-the-usps-as-a-financial-service-could-create-revenue-and-help-the-poor, Accessed 2/5/2014

100 Richard Eskow, Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future, February 5, 2014, “Post Office Banking Could Be the Start of Something Big,” Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/post-office-banking-could_b_4727935.html, Accessed 2/5/2014

101 Elizabeth Warren, U.S. Senator (D-MA), February 1, 2014, “Coming to a Post Office Near You: Loans You

Can Trust?,” Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-warren/coming-to-a-post-office-n_b_4709485.html,

Accessed 2/5/2014

102 David Dayen, Staff Writer, January 28, 2014, “The Post Office Should Just Become a Bank,” New Republic,

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116374/postal-service-banking-how-usps-can-save-itself-and-help-poor, Accessed 2/5/2014

103 Richard Eskow, Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future, February 5, 2014, “Post Office Banking Could Be the Start of Something Big,” Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/post-office-banking-could_b_4727935.html, Accessed 2/5/2014

104 Darrell Delamaide, Staff Writer, February 4, 2014, “Can post offices fill banks' gaps?,” USA Today,

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/02/04/delamaide-post-offices-offering-financial-services/5206049/

105 Lara Salahi, Staff Writer, February 4, 2014, “Sen. Elizabeth Warren: Post offices should offer banking services,”

Boston Herald, http://www.boston.com/news/source/2014/02/sen_elizabeth_warren_backs_idea_of_post_office_offering_ fina.html, Accessed 2/5/2014

106 Joshua Brustein, Staff Writer, February 03, 2014, “Would the U.S. Postal Service Make a Better Banker for the

Poor?,” Bloomberg Businessweek, http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-02-03/would-u-dot-s-dot-post-office-make-a-better-banker-for-the-poor, Accessed 2/5/2014

107 Matthew Yglesias, Staff Writer, January 28, 2014, “Is Postal Banking Already Legal?,” Slate,

http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2014/01/29/postal_banking_is_it_already_legal.html, Accessed 2/5/2014

108 David Dayen, Staff Writer, January 28, 2014, “The Post Office Should Just Become a Bank,” New Republic,

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116374/postal-service-banking-how-usps-can-save-itself-and-help-poor, Accessed 2/5/2014

109 Darrell Delamaide, Staff Writer, February 4, 2014, “Can post offices fill banks' gaps?,” USA Today,

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/02/04/delamaide-post-offices-offering-financial-services/5206049/

110 Danielle Douglas, Staff Writer, January 27, 2014, “Expanding financial services is available route for the Postal

Service, report says,” Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/expanding-financial-services-is-

available-route-for-the-post-office-report-says/2014/01/27/5bd974e8-8788-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html, Accessed

2/5/2014

111 Boston Herald, Staff Editorial, February 2, 2014, “Back to the future at USPS,” Accessed 2/5/2014,

http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/opinion/editorials/2014/02/back_to_the_future_at_usps

112 J. E. Dyer, Staff Writer, February 5, 2014, “The Obama Administration’s Attack on the US Financial System,” The

Jewish Press, http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/analysis/j-e-dyer/the-obama-administrations-attack-on-the-us-financial-system/2014/02/05/, Accessed 2/5/2014

113 Joshua Brustein, Staff Writer, February 03, 2014, “Would the U.S. Postal Service Make a Better Banker for the

Poor?,” Bloomberg Businessweek, http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-02-03/would-u-dot-s-dot-post-office-make-a-better-banker-for-the-poor, Accessed 2/5/2014

114 Adam Levitin, professor of law at Georgetown University, January 31, 2014, “Postal Banking: Maybe Not So Crazy After All,” American Banker,

http://www.americanbanker.com/bankthink/postal-banking-maybe-not-so-crazy- after-all- 1065325-1.html, Accessed 2/5/2014

115 Danielle Douglas, Staff Writer, January 27, 2014, “Expanding financial services is available route for the Postal

Service, report says,” Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/expanding-financial-services-is-

available-route-for-the-post-office-report-says/2014/01/27/5bd974e8-8788-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html, Accessed

2/5/2014

116 Danielle Douglas, Staff Writer, January 27, 2014, “Expanding financial services is available route for the Postal

Service, report says,” Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/expanding-financial-services-is-

available-route-for-the-post-office-report-says/2014/01/27/5bd974e8-8788-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html, Accessed

2/5/2014

117 Darrell Delamaide, Staff Writer, February 4, 2014, “Can post offices fill banks' gaps?,” USA Today,

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/02/04/delamaide-post-offices-offering-financial-services/5206049/

118 Mirror, 'Lone wolf' terror growing as extremists switch to smaller-scale plots, Government expert warns, 17 July 2013, http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/lone-wolf-terror-growing-extremists-2060700119 CNN, Josh Levs, Boy, 8, One of 3 Killed in Bombings at Boston Marathon; Scores Wounded, 4.15.2013,http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/15/us/boston-marathon-explosions120 The Week, London's Gruesome Attack and the Rising Threat of Lone-wolf Terrorism, July 2013, http://theweek.com/article/index/244633/londons-gruesome-attack-and-the-rising-threat-of-lone-wolf-terrorism121 The Diplomat, China's "New Kind of Terrorism" Is Winning Hearts and Minds, July 2013,http://thediplomat.com/china-power/chinas-new-kind-of-terrorism-is-winning-hearts-and-minds/122 Reuters, Hezbollah Says EU Invites Israel Attack on Lebanon, 24 July 2013,http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/24/us-eu-hezbollah-nasrallah-idUSBRE96N17A20130724123 LA Times, Jeffrey Fleishman, Egypt's Military Chief Asks Public Support to Fight 'terrorism’, 24 July 2013,http://www.latimes.com/news/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-egypt-army-sisi-20130724,0,1965041.story124 RAND Corp, Johnston, Patrick, The Impact of U.S. Drone Strikes on Terrorism in Pakistan and Afghanistan, July 2013,http://patrickjohnston.info/materials/drones.pdf125 The Washington Times, Noam Chomsky: Obama Is ‘dedicated to Increasing Terrorism, June 19 2013,http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/19/noam-chomsky-obama-dedicated-increasing-terrorism/126 Council on Foreign Relations, The Global Regime for Terrorism, July 2013, http://www.cfr.org/asia-and-pacific/global-regime-terrorism/p25729127 Euro News, "‘We Can’t Just Close Our Eyes’, EU Adds Hezbollah’s Militant Branch to Terrorism Blacklist." 7.22.2013,

http://www.euronews.com/2013/07/22/we-cannot-just-close-our-eyes-the-eu-adds-hezbollahs-militant-branch-to-terr/128 Haaretz, "An inside Look at the EU Decision How a Terror Attack Backfired on Hezbollah." July 2013,http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.537318129 NDTV, Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood rejects appeal to accept Mohamed Morsi's ouster, August 6, 2013, http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/egypt-s-muslim-brotherhood-rejects-appeal-to-accept-mohamed-morsi-s-ouster-401806130 Reuters, "SPECIAL REPORT - How the Muslim Brotherhood Lost Egypt." 25 July 2013. http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/07/25/egypt-mistakes-muslim-brotherhood-idINDEE96O06T20130725131 The Week, "Did Egypt's Military Just Declare War on the Muslim Brotherhood?, July 2013, http://theweek.com/article/index/247349/did-egypts-military-just-declare-war-on-the-muslim-brotherhood132 The Heritage Foundation, Counterterrorism Strategy: U.S. Should Not Lose Momentum in War on Terrorism, 2012, http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/09/counterterrorism-strategy-us-should-not-lose-momentum-in-war-on-terrorism133 Chicago Tribune, The Decline of Terrorism, 18 Apr. 2013, http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-04-18/news/ct-oped-0418-chapman-20130418_1_terrorism-new-york-times-world-trade-center134 Lindsay Whitehurst, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013 , “Three-soda-a-day sugar habit could be toxic, Utah study finds 25% sugar boost made male mice less potent and females die at twice the normal rate,” The Salt Lake Tribune, http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56713910-78/mice-sugar-percent-potts.html.csp , Accessed 8/17/2013

135 Meeri Kim, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013, “Study: Sugar even at moderate levels toxic to mice health, reproduction,” Washington Post, http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-08-13/national/41374253_1_mice-sugar-consumption-females, Accessed 8/17/2013

136 Mary MacVean, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013, “Scientists say sugar at levels considered safe is harmful,” Los Angeles Times, http://articles.latimes.com/2013/aug/13/news/la-sn-sugar-20130813, Accessed 8/20/2013

137 Rachel Tepper, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013, “Study Shows Sugar Is Toxic In Mice -- What This Might Mean For You,” Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/13/sugar-toxic_n_3749550.html, Accessed 8/17/2013138 Rachel Tepper, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013, “Study Shows Sugar Is Toxic In Mice -- What This Might Mean For You,” Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/13/sugar-toxic_n_3749550.html, Accessed 8/17/2013

139 Laura McMullen, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013, “Health Buzz: Sugar in What's Considered 'Safe' Doses Still Risky,” US News & World Report, http://health.usnews.com/health-news/articles/2013/08/13/study-the-danger-of-consuming-25-percent-more-sugar, Accessed 8/20/2013

140 Tamarra Kemsley, Staff Writer, Aug 13, 2013, “Consumption of Added Sugar Even Within Recommended Levels Highly Toxic: A Study,” Natural World News, http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/3466/20130813/consumption-added-sugar-even-within-recommended-levels-highly-toxic-study.htm, Accessed 8/21/2013

141 Crystal Phend, Staff writer, Aug 16, 2013, “Lab Notes: Sugar-Fed Mice Lose the Rat Race,” MedPage Today, http://www.medpagetoday.com/LabNotes/LabNotes/41036, Accessed 8/17/2013

142 Rachel Tepper, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013, “Study Shows Sugar Is Toxic In Mice -- What This Might Mean For You,” Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/13/sugar-toxic_n_3749550.html, Accessed 8/17/2013

143 Francie Diep, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013, “Study: Sugar-Munching Mice Die Earlier,” Popular Science, http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-08/daily-soda-habit-impairs-evolutionary-fitness-mice-study-finds, Accessed 8/20/2013

144 Rachel Tepper, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013, “Study Shows Sugar Is Toxic In Mice -- What This Might Mean For You,” Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/13/sugar-toxic_n_3749550.html, Accessed 8/17/2013

145 Mary MacVean, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013, “Scientists say sugar at levels considered safe is harmful,” Los Angeles Times, http://articles.latimes.com/2013/aug/13/news/la-sn-sugar-20130813, Accessed 8/20/2013

146 Andrew Briscoe III, Sugar Association President and CEO, August 14, 2013, “Sugar Association Addresses Misrepresentation of Recent Study,” Sacramento Bee, http://www.sacbee.com/2013/08/14/5650701/sugar-association-addresses-misrepresentation.html , Accessed 8/17/2013

147 Andrew Briscoe III, president and CEO of the Sugar Association, August 15, 2013, “‘Sugar study’ studied fructose, not sugar,” Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/sugar-study-studied-fructose-not-sugar/2013/08/15/3f3fb698-0543-11e3-bfc5-406b928603b2_story.html, Accessed 8/17/2013

148 James Fluere, Staff Writer, August 15, 2013, “Sugar Association slams misrepresentation of three sodas per day study,” Science Recorder, http://www.sciencerecorder.com/news/sugar-association-slams-misrepresentation-of-three-sodas-per- day-study/, Accessed 8/17/2013149 Dan Cossins, Staff Writer, August 15, 2013, ““Safe” Sugar Levels Harm Mice,” The Scientist, Accessed 8/17/2013, http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/37059/title/-Safe--Sugar-Levels-Harm-Mice/

150 Brian Owens, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013, “‘Safe’ levels of sugar harmful to mice’”, Nature, http://www.nature.com/news/safe-levels-of-sugar-harmful-to-mice-1.13555, Accessed 8/15/2013

151 Meeri Kim, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013, “Study: Sugar even at moderate levels toxic to mice health, reproduction,” Washington Post,

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-08-13/national/41374253_1_mice-sugar-consumption-females, Accessed 8/17/2013

152 Francie Diep, Staff Writer, August 13, 2013, “Study: Sugar-Munching Mice Die Earlier,” Popular Science, http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-08/daily-soda-habit-impairs-evolutionary-fitness-mice-study-finds, Accessed 8/20/2013

153 Anna Donald and Vivek Muthu, founders of Bazian, August 14 2013, “Could three fizzy drinks a day damage your health?,” NHS Choices, http://www.nhs.uk/news/2013/08August/Pages/Could-three-fizzy-drinks-a-day-damage-your-health.aspx, Accessed 8/19/2013

154 Noam Chomsky, Institute Professor emeritus, MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, June 4, 2013, “Humanity Imperiled,” The Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/noam- chomsky/climate-change-nuclear-war_b_3383593.html

155 PR Chari, Visiting Professor, Institute for Peace and Conflict Studies, June 25, 2013,

“Obama And Nuclear Disarmament: Why Berlin Is Not Prague-II – Analysis,” Eurasia Review, Accessed 8/23/2013, http://www.eurasiareview.com/25062013-obama-and-nuclear-disarmament-why-berlin-is-not-prague-ii-analysis/

156 Ralph Cossa, president of Pacific Forum CSIS and David Santoro is senior fellow for Nonproliferation and Disarmament at Pacific Forum CSIS, December 11, 2012, International Relations and Security Network, http://isnblog.ethz.ch/security/obamas-nuclear-agenda-the-next-four-years, Accessed 8/22/2013

157 Lawrence M. Krauss is a theoretical physicist at Arizona State University, July 6, 2013, “Letting Go of Our Nukes,” New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/07/opinion/sunday/letting-go-of-our-nukes.html?_r=0, Accessed 8/22/2013

158 Tariq Osman Hyder, former Pakistani diplomat, January 5, 2013, “Building nuclear confidence?,” The Nation, http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/columns/04-Jan-2013/building-nuclear- Confidence, Accessed 8/22/2013

159 Gu Guoliang is the Director at the Center for Arms Control and Nonproliferation Studies at the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, January 14, 2013, “Obama’s Nuclear Arms Agenda and its Implications for China,” China Focus, http://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/obamas-nuclear-arms-agenda-and-its-implications-for-china/, Accessed 8/23/2013

160 Rachel Oswald, Staff Writer, April 24, 2013, “China’s New Defense Paper Causes Stir Over No-First-Use Nuke Policy,” Global Security Newswire, http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/chinas-new-defense-white-paper-causes-stir-over-questions-no- first-use-policy/, Accessed 8/23/2013

161 Tariq Osman Hyder, former Pakistani diplomat, January 5, 2013, “Building nuclear confidence?,” The Nation, http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/columns/04-Jan-2013/building-nuclear- Confidence, Accessed 8/22/2013

162 Todd S. Sechser and Matthew Fuhrmann, Stanton Nuclear Security Fellows at the Council on Foreign Relations, Winter 2013, “Crisis Bargaining and Nuclear Blackmail,” International Organization, v. 67, pp. 173-195

163 George Perkovich, vice-president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and director of its non-proliferation programme, April 1, 2013, “Do Unto Others: Toward a Defensible Nuclear Doctrine,” The Carnegie Nuclear Policy Program, http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/04/01/do-unto-others-toward-defensible-nuclear-doctrine/fvbs?reloadFlag=1 , Accessed 8/21/2013

164 Michael S. Gerson, research analyst at the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA), February 2011, “The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use." Policy Brief, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, International Security, http://belfercenter.hks.harvard.edu/publication/20712/future_of_us_ nuclear_policy.html, Accessed 8/23/2013

165 Michael S. Gerson, research analyst at the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA), February 2011, “The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use." Policy Brief, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, International Security, http://belfercenter.hks.harvard.edu/publication/20712/future_of_us_ nuclear_policy.html, Accessed 8/23/2013

166 Bill Gertz, Staff Writer, May 16, 2013, “Obama to Announce Major US Nuclear Force Cuts Soon,” NewsMax, http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-nuclear-arsenal-cuts/2013/05/15/id/504736?s=al, Accessed 8/22/2013

167 Michael Mazza, research fellow in foreign and defense policy at the American Enterprise Institute, March 27, 2012, “Obama lets America's nuclear guard down,” Wall Street Journal Asia, http://www.aei.org/article/foreign-and-defense-policy/regional/asia/obama-lets-americas-nuclear-guard-down/, Accessed 8/23/2013

168 Alexander Lanoszka and Thomas Leo Scherer, Princeton University - Department of Politics, 2012, “The Strategic Implications of a No First Use Nuclear Policy: A Formal Analysis,” APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper , http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2110152, Accessed 8/23/2013

169 George Perkovich, vice-president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and director of its non-proliferation programme, April 1, 2013, “Do Unto Others: Toward a Defensible Nuclear Doctrine,” The Carnegie Nuclear Policy Program, http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/04/01/do-unto-others-toward-defensible-nuclear-doctrine/fvbs?reloadFlag=1 , Accessed 8/21/2013

170 George Perkovich, vice-president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and director of its non-proliferation programme, April 1, 2013, “Do Unto Others: Toward a Defensible Nuclear Doctrine,” The Carnegie Nuclear Policy Program, http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/04/01/do-unto-others-toward-defensible-nuclear-doctrine/fvbs?reloadFlag=1 , Accessed 8/21/2013

171 Alexander Lanoszka and Thomas Leo Scherer, Princeton University - Department of Politics, 2012, “The Strategic Implications of a No First Use Nuclear Policy: A Formal Analysis,” APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper , http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2110152, Accessed 8/23/2013

172 James M. Acton is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, April 19, 2013, “Is China Changing Its Position on Nuclear Weapons?,” New York Times, Accessed 8/23/2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/19/opinion/is-china-changing-its-position-on-nuclear-weapons.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

173 Ralph Barat Saltsman, Stephen Warren Solomon and Stephen Allen Jamieson, attorneys practicing in the areas of ABC law, June 18, 2004, “Alcohol Problem - Native American Nations Should Set Their Own Liquor-Licensing Rules”, accessed August 26, 2013 http://www.ssjlaw.com/art13.html174 Fox News, national news organization, ¶ August 15, 2013¶ “South Dakota's Pine Ridge Indian Reservation votes to legalize alcohol”, accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/15/vote-to-legalize-alcohol-on-south-dakota-pine-ridge-passes/175 DENISE MARTINEZ-RAMUNDO, correspondent for ABC News, October 13, 2011, ¶ “First Alcoholic Drink at Age 5? Reservation Counselor Says It’s Happening”, accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2011/10/first-alcoholic-drink-at-age-5-reservation-counselor-says-its-happening/176 Paloma Esquivel, writer for the LA Times, February 02, 2013¶ “Liquor stores divide a dry reservation”, Accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://articles.latimes.com/2013/feb/02/nation/la-na-hometown-pine-ridge-20130203177 Tom Robertson, Minnesota news reporter, October 22, 2007, “Fetal Alcohol Syndrome: The Invisible Disorder”, Accessed August 26, 2013 http://minnesota.publicradio.org/about/people/mpr_people_display.php?aut_id=61178 Ryan Emery, writer for NITV news, ¶ August 2, 2013, ¶ “Foetal alcohol syndrome victim calls on pregnant women not to drink", accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2013/08/02/foetal-alcohol-syndrome-victim-calls-pregnant-women-not-drink179 John Koppisch, editor of the Asia stories section of Forbes, December 13, 2011¶ “Why Are Indian Reservations So Poor? A Look At The Bottom 1%”, accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoppisch/2011/12/13/why-are-indian-reservations-so-poor-a-look-at-

the-bottom-1/180 Lisa Wirthman, writer for the Denver Post, May 27, 2012, ¶ “Pine Ridge Indian Reservation is drowning in beer”, accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_20704990/drowning-beer181 DENISE MARTINEZ-RAMUNDO, correspondent for ABC News, October 13, 2011, ¶ “First Alcoholic Drink at Age 5? Reservation Counselor Says It’s Happening”, accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2011/10/first-alcoholic-drink-at-age-5-reservation-counselor-says-its-happening/182 CARSON WALKER, journalist and writer for Salon.com, ¶ August 14, 2013¶ “Vote to legalize alcohol on SD’s Pine Ridge passes”, accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://www.salon.com/2013/08/15/vote_to_legalize_alcohol_on_sds_pine_ridge_passes/183 S.E. Smith, journalist and activist for Care 2, August 26, 2013, “¶ Alcohol Could Soon Be Legal on South Dakota Reservation”, Accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://www.care2.com/causes/alcohol-could-soon-be-legal-on-south-dakota-reservation.html184 Fox News, national news organization, ¶ August 15, 2013¶ “South Dakota's Pine Ridge Indian Reservation votes to legalize alcohol”, accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/15/vote-to-legalize-alcohol-on-south-dakota-pine-ridge-passes/185 Paul Hammel, writer for Omaha news, ¶ August 16, 2013, ¶ “With Pine Ridge vote to end prohibition, Whiteclay stands to lose lots of beer sales”, accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://www.omaha.com/article/20130816/NEWS/130819272186 John Koppisch, editor of the Asia stories section of Forbes, December 13, 2011¶ “Why Are Indian Reservations So Poor? A Look At The Bottom 1%”, accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoppisch/2011/12/13/why-are-indian-reservations-so-poor-a-look-at-the-bottom-1/187 Terry Anderson, John and Jean De Nault Senior Fellow and Cochair, Property Rights, Freedom, and Prosperity Task Force, February 24, 2011, “Un-American Reservations”, accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://www.hoover.org/publications/defining-ideas/article/67756188 GILBERT QUINTERO, Ph.D. Cultural Anthropology, August 2012, “Making the Indian: Colonial Knowledge, Alcohol, and Native Americans”, accessed August 26, 2013¶ http://www.medanthro.net/adtsg/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Quintero-Making-Indian.pdf