biology - the myth of evolution

BIOLOGY – THE MYTH OF EVOLUTION / BY: SCRIBE VALDEMIR MOTA DE MENEZES

BIOLOGY

THE MYTH OF

EVOLUTION

1


PURPOSE OF THIS WORK

The literary materials author not-for-profit, or generate you any type of revenue. Book costs are only to cover the costs of production, transportation, taxes and resellers. Your satisfaction is to contribute to the good of education, a better quality of life for all people and living things, and to glorify the only Almighty God.

CONTACTS:

www.youtube.com/user/storytellervaldemir

www.facebook.com/menezes.scribe.3

Blog: teoriadaevolucao-biblia.blogspot.com.br

E-mail: [email protected]

www.dailymotion.com/scribevaldemir

AUTHORIZATION

The book may be reproduced and distributed by any means, used by any religious, educational or cultural entity without permission of the author.

AUTHOR: Valdemir Mota de Menezes a degree in Biological Sciences and History at the Metropolitan University of Santos, has the degree in Business Administration and a Bachelor of Theology from the College of the Assemblies of God of Santos, was born in Itabaiana/Sergipe/Brazil, in 1969.

2

M543 Menezes, Valdemir, 1969

Biology – The Myth of Evolution/ Valdemir Mota de Menezes, Cubatao/SP, Amazon.com Clubedosautores.com.br, 2015

103 p. ; 21 cm

ISBN-13: 978-1505874570

ISBN-10: 1505874572

1. Biology 2. Theory of evolution 3. Evolucionism

4. Criacionism I - Title

CDD 570

http://www.dailymotion.com/scribevaldemir

http://www.facebook.com/menezes.scribe.3


DESCRIPTION

This book BIOLOGY has the definite purpose of refuting the theory of evolution and exalt God as the one responsible for creating. We dedicate this volume to the Creator that is very close to men, as the Scripture says in Acts 17.24-28. Through this book, we tax God with the title of THE LORD OF LIFE. Men announced this literature that their existence here originated from a CREATION ACT and not a process of evolution. The true believers in God, this book will reinforce their beliefs regarding the origin of life and of man. Scientists request reconsideration of theories that hinder the development of science, noting that no belief should divert research at its sole purpose: THE TRUTH.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

3

M543 Menezes, Valdemir, 1969

Biology – The Myth of Evolution/ Valdemir Mota de Menezes, Cubatao/SP, Amazon.com Clubedosautores.com.br, 2015

103 p. ; 21 cm

ISBN-13: 978-1505874570

ISBN-10: 1505874572

1. Biology 2. Theory of evolution 3. Evolucionism

4. Criacionism I - Title

CDD 570


I - THE PURPOSE OF BIOLOGY

II - ANATOMY

1 - Comparative anatomy

2 - Brain Power

3 - Hand Anatomy

4 - Skull

5 - Anatomy of the spine

6 - The prehistoric man

III - HISTOLOGY

1 - The skin

IV - CTOLOGY

1 - Chromosomes

2 - Number and size of cells

3 - Cellular Database

4 - Scourge Bacterial

V - PHYSIOLOGY

1 - vocal apparatus

VI - STOICHIOMETRY

1 - DNA

VII - BIODYNAMIC

VIII - ONTOGENY

1 - Embryology

IX - GENETIC

1 - Inheritance

2 - Hybridization

4


3 - Mutation

X - PHYLOGENY

1 - The history of living things

2 - Spontaneous Generation

3 - Inheritance of Acquired Characters

4 - Natural Selection

5 - Mutation

6 - The steps of evolution

7 - bipedalism

XI - BIOGEOGRAPHY

1 - Adaptation

XII - SYSTEMATIC

1 - The kingdoms

2 - Classification of man

3 - Family

4 - Kingdom Protista - Algae

XIII - PALEONTOLOGY

1 - The Ages

2 - Cambrian Period

3 - Missing Link

4 - The prehistoric man

A - Ramapithecus

B - Australopithecus afarensis

C - Australopithecus africanus

D - Australopithecus robustus

5


E - Homo habilis

F - Homo Erectus

G - Homo Sapiens

H - Homo neanderthalensis

I - Homo sapiens sapiens

J - Cro-Magnon

5 - Bible Paleontology

6 - Dating

A - Carbon 14

B - Potassium-Argon

CONCLUSION

1 – Consequences of Theory of Evolution

BIOLOGY

INTRODUCTION

6


Biology is the study of life, and this word was used the first time by Lamarck in France in the year 1801. Our intention in studying biology as a theological matter is mainly explained by the THEORY OF EVOLUTION, as this philosophical doctrine conflicts with the doctrine the biblical CREATION.

Only illustrative photo

It is the consensus among evolutionary scientists to determine how the scientific arguments for the theory of evolution

This book will not make much use of the Bible to prove the creation, has given that it is evident and clear that in all the Scriptures this doctrine is strong. So our readers should understand that we fight fire with fire, or try to use scientific arguments to rebut the philosophical theory of evolution. More than 100 years after Darwin and the theory of evolution has not been proven and is, therefore, a vain philosophy.

THE LANGUAGE OF EVOLUTIONISTS

Evolutionists demonstrate the fragility of their theories by own vocabulary that often they use when they try to explains it. If evolution were true, their claims should be made with conviction and not using dubious terms and citing possibilities that most demonstrate the power of imagination of evolutionists than proven facts.

Just to see our readers that we are not accusing unfounded, let's see an example from a journal entitled matter was ANCESTORS: A FAMILY ALBUM.

Maybe for some [...], there are signs [...], maybe [...], may have occurred [...], it was believed [...], do not know if he [...],... this suggests [...], may have been able [...], must have [...], may probably [...], may be also likely it is believed [...], it is also believed likely possibly also likely [...], is considered now believed [...], it was considered [...], scholars think that [...], it may have been [...], most likely [...], must have [...], probably there is no evidence [...], it is believed may have been [...], indicates that [...], it is possible that [...], probably [...], is likely [...], another evidence suggests [...], apparently were left [...], a great controversy [...], apparently [...], suggest that were not [...], entirely understood, opens the door for new assumptions ... we know almost nothing

7


[...], there is no certainty about [...], evidence suggests [...], remains uncertain [...], maybe they are [...], apparently [...]. (ILLUSTRATED SCIENCE, October 1982, page 44 to 51).

Lamarck, Jean-Baptiste (France, 1744-1829) This man was wrong, but in the nineteenth-century science class said that he was right.

I - THE PURPOSE OF BIOLOGY

Biology is divided into three classes:

A – Zoology.

B – Botany.

C - General Biology.

In turn, the General Biology is divided into five groups:

1 - BIOESTATICS SCIENCES

Studies living beings from the angle of a physical structure. Are parts of these sciences:

A - Anatomy - studies the structure of living things.

B - Histology - studies the tissues of living organisms.

C - Cytology - studies the cells of living beings.

D - Morphology - studies the forms of living beings.

2 – BIODYNAMICS SCIENCES

Science represented by physiology:

A - Physiology - studies the activities and functions of the body.

8


3 - BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES

Studies the interaction of chemistry in living things. Subdivided into two sciences:

A - Stoichiometry - Analyzes chemical compositions in living things.

B - Biodynamics - Analyzes chemical changes in living things.

4 - SCIENCES BIOGENIC

Studying the origins of life on three aspects:

A - Ontogeny - studies the evolution of the living from egg to the full development.

B - Genetics - studies the heredity.

C - Phylogeny - Study the history of living beings.

5 - SCIENCES BIOTAXICS

It is divided into three sciences:

A - Taxonomy - these scientific names of beings.

B - Biogeography - Study the factors that determine the distribution of organisms on the planet.

C - Systematic - studies the groups of species.

There are also complementary sciences of biology that are:

A - Paleontology - study the fossils that testify to the traces of life millennia.

B - Ecology - studies the relationship among living beings.

9


Simian skulls extinct, of men of different races, and the pieces of refurbished skulls do not prove that men evolved from primates.

"The evolutionary process is blind" (Leakey) – picture above, Johanson with the skeleton of Lucy. Evolutionists follow a blind, and as Jesus said, "Both will fall into a pit" (Matthew 15:14).

II - ANATOMY

1 - COMPARATIVE ANATOMY

Evolutionists to defend the theory of evolution invoke the "organ connecting principle”, that is, the relative position of a organ in relation to other organs is always the same; this idea is also called COMPARATIVE ANATOMY, whose author was Saint-Hilaire.

Based on this hypothesis is that it claims to be the monkey the closest relative of the man, as they have many physical similarities with humans. However, we think it is going too far, coming streaks of mythological to say that the apparent anatomical similarity equivalent to proof of evolution, because this argument is used by teachers and

10


biologists who often, are mere automatons, only know how to repeat what you learned in school or university, but are unable to think freely, putting proves the theory of evolution.

What can be proven with the appearance of similar bodies? That human and other animals have evolved from each other? And the amazing thing, to say that evolution from one species to another was all by chance? This is how to explain these machines called perfect life? Can give credit to Charles Darwin, who did not even know of the existence of DNA and did not even know the high complexity that exists in a single cell?

The wings and the feet of birds, members of the human body, the feet of the frogs, the flippers of seals and whales, the legs and the wings of ducks, the hoofs of quadrupeds, what does this have to do with evolution?

A wooden shack, a block house, a mansion filled with aluminum and smoked glass, a building, or the Burj Khalifa in Dubai Tower with its 828 meters tall, it could be argued that one evolved from the other? There have been designed and built according to the will of its creators? Matters of coincidence? And look at these buildings are little comparisons near the complexity of a living organism with its millions of interconnected cells... Would it not have God the right and the power to create living beings as well you pleased?

SATIRE REAL ESTATE EVOLUTION

"There are billion years was only wood and rafter ..."

11


"The accumulation of dust, there are 200 million years old, formed walls ..."

"Frequent floods shaped ‘homepithecus’ there are 50 million years ago."

"The emergence of the glass in the holes marked the beginning of 'homehabilis' there is a million years ago."

"The ‘homeerectus’ 500 thousand years ago already had ornate columns."

12


"There are 200,000 years ago, new staircases and floors jumped in real estate development."

"There are 20,000 years ago came the ‘buildings-magnon’ already with social and service elevator."

The fact that a house be similar to other types of constructions mentioned here, justifies believe in the spontaneous evolution of building materials? The similarity of the houses have in common like foundations, doorways, windows, and ceilings, justify the belief that a wooden shack after millions of years has become a luxury building? More absurd still believe that grain inorganic materials over millions of years, without a higher power without intelligence to lead it managed to produce the perfect of machines of the universe: The human being. There will be no white dresses men with an enviable resume that will make me believe most fairy tale I've ever met: The Theory of Evolution.

Darwin's caricature published in the journal The Hornet on 22 March 1871. Darwin was the greatest bluffer history, it applies the phrase of George Burns, "Sincerity is everything if you get it defrauds you're done."

2 - MENTAL CAPACITY

The anatomical structure of the brain and skull measures are not as important, as the size of the head worth something the elephant and the whale would be smarter. But is the incomparable intelligence of man that

13


separates it from all other living beings preventing any comparison of all animals to man.

In "Life" magazine was published a statement of the superiority of the human brain:

Brain neurons make thousands of links among them. But the extra innumerable provided by the human cortex multiply almost to infinity the brain's ability to observe and analyze data. And it is this absolute power to cope with massive data sets on man an incomparably superior to any other living thing class. (LIFE, June 28, 1963)

Still comparing the abysmal difference between men to primates, Dr. Dobzhansky says the following:

"Chimpanzees are many superior to other non-human primates, in memory, imagination and ability to learn. However, there is a vast gulf between the intellectual capacity of chimpanzees and man. Symbolic reactions can be learned by chimpanzees only with great difficulty, and their frequency does not increase with experience and age." (THE BIOLOGICAL BASE OF HUMAN FREEDOM, p 102).

Directors of the Jehovah’s Witness Association made an interesting observation about this comparison between man and animals:

"Yes, there is an unbridgeable gulf between man and animal. If evolution were true, there would be no such gap. There would be intermediate stages of intelligence, but these are not found anywhere. Evolutionists claim that these stages were men 'prehistoric' that are now extinct. But why would persist lower animals such as monkeys, while all men 'prehistoric', supposedly superior, disappeared? There were such men 'prehistoric' really?" (MAN DID GET HERE BY EVOLUTION OR BY CREATION? p 77 in the portuguese version)

3 - HAND ANATOMY

Fossilized bones of Australopithecus Robustus hand, dated 1.8 million years generated a controversy to the Theory of Evolution. According to the professor at the University of New York, Randall Susman, the fingers of this creature has a similar configuration to the modern man and flexibility to handle stones and bones, turning them into tools. Such an explanation placed in doubt elsewhere in the theory of evolution: is that if the "Robustus" could produce tools, then they should have survived as the "homo". Because one disappeared, and another survived, is another mystery. To say that "Robustus" fed up of vegetables and the "homo" survived because besides vegetables also fed meat is a poor argument.

14


The big difference from man to animals is not anatomical, but spiritual and intellectual. The man has a spirit, animals do not. Man has a psyche (soul) that gives the ability to have self-consciousness, to know the universe and the existence of God, but the animals do not have is awareness.

4 - SKULL

Like the modern man's skull with skulls of prehistoric men prove nothing for evolution. The more similar skulls of said 'prehistoric' are human races that were extinguished and the differences can be explained by variations that can exist within the same species. Examples of these variations are found until today where there are small human as the pygmies and dwarves reaching just over a meter high, to the Germanic type and some African groups that often are the two meters high. The skulls of Australopithecus are more extinct primate species than man's evolutionary relatives.

Let's wake up to the truth, the Australopithecus were primates like monkeys, were never evolutionary link of man, they became extinct and their skulls remaining, attest that they were more like chimpanzees than for men.

"The skull similar to ours is not the man evolution of the link. Neanderthal man is more extinct human race than link of evolution. "

15


5 - SPINAL COLUMN ANATOMY

In fact, the 'believers' in the evolution resort to any arguments to convince people and themselves on the belief in evolution, for example, the brazilian magazine “SEE” published this cavernous explanation of back pain. Carefully read and meditate on the monkey and the tiger legend. It's almost a shame this little story, but people are more willing to believe this lie than the legitimacy of the creation.

The back pain it is much older than imaginable. It began in Africa for at least 10 million years. At that time, pressed by the scarcity of food in the forests, Ramapithecus flocks, the original primate evolutionary line leading to man, left to jump from branch to branch, and ventured timidly by savannahs. The recognition of new ground was painful for tribe members. No branches or vines to cling, they crept awkwardly in the bushes, on four legs. The first nagging back pain crisis, a fable grateful to doctors, was one of those raids. A Ramapithecus threatened by a ferocious tiger, grabbed a stone with the front legs. In a sudden movement, rose on its hind legs and flung against the predator. The stone hit the target, but the victory came at a high price. The unprecedented effort to stay upright made the poor animal go through a violent pain. The ancestor of man was the first effort to stand - and invented back problems and back pain. Evils that come for millennia the evolution of the human species. Since then, as a biological original sin, the curse Ramapithecus divides humanity into two types of people: those who have back problems and those who will still have. (Magazine 'SEE', author: Aroldo Campos, 02.10.1988, page 48)

Staying creating absurd assumptions, without any scientific proof, throwing everything into a far time is ugly ... First we must understand that our bodies are designed to work well within the limits of physics. Second, with the 'regression', and not with evolution, came to the degeneration of the human species, we were created to live forever, but with the fall of mankind, we now have a nature similar to that of animals. So our bodies deteriorate over time until we come to die. Specific problems can cause back pain and disease in the general body. When humanity began to consume too much sugar, we now have major problems of caries in the teeth. The colonizers of Brazil, Portuguese and Europeans had many caries, while the native Indians of Brazil had no problems so far, this was related to the habit of eating too much sugar. With the development of toothpastes containing fluoride, decreased the caries problem worldwide. Similarly modern habits of work and be sitting most of the day, or at the office or sitting on the couch in seats that damage the column, did increase the incidence of back problems. Today the factories put up for sale ergonomic chairs that best fit the column, more comfortable car seats for the column, in addition, doctors have recommended exercises like swimming and walking to strengthen the muscles around the spine. These back problems are isolated and can be

16


minimized with the right attitudes. Even the famous doctor Drauzio Varella in a series of Brazilian TV narrated a legend like this monkey and tiger to show the origins of back pain. We should pay attention to the fact that organic degeneration is a natural process as a consequence of sin and disobedience (Romans 5:12).

5 - THE PREHISTORIC MAN

The shape of the prehistoric man is a major scientific fraud and the worst, the helpless students of primary and secondary schools are poisoned with belief in evolution as if it were indisputable historical fact, but it is not all scientists think.

Indeed, Boyce Rensberger writing in Science Digest agree that imagination, not evidence, was what shaped prehistoric men. Boyce calls this morphological reconstitution of Divination. Did you just acetic for the things of God, or you also test the falsely called SCIENCE? (I Timothy 6:20).

THE ANTROPOART

The nearest idea that we can form the ancestors comes from paintings and sculptures created by artists working with anthropologists. Unfortunately, most of these works is based more on imagination than on evidence. But there are also artists with natural knowledge, able to recompose a hominid from a fossil bone. For that, you need to understand enough of anatomy. Many of these bones have small grooves and brands, each of which corresponds to the link with a particular muscle. Examining the marks, the artist can estimate the original size of hominid musculature.

Following the indications of the bones, are produced replicas in clay than would be the muscles, apply on the replicas, a plastic copy of the bones; also with clay, empty, understood to have been fat-fulfill; Finally, if all-covering with a final layer of clay, which is the skin.

Yet most of these reconstructions are only guessing exercises. The bones, after all, cannot reveal the fleshy parts of the nose, lips, and ears. Finally, the artists know they have to create between man and monkey. The older is considered the specimen in reconstruction, more apelike will be the way that will give you.

The guessing exercise often leads to misunderstandings. The recent discovery of hominid footprints preserved showed how some artists err in attributing to Neanderthals toes huge and divergent, similar to those of monkeys. The footprints revealed that, millions of years before the Neanderthals, foot hominid, was already thoroughly modern. (ILLUSTRATED SCIENCE, October 1982, page 49)

17


III - HISTOLOGY

Apparently in the theory of evolution is an attack against the Creator, invented purely to dismiss the truth of creation and establish through propaganda the lies and the myth. Histology is a serious branch of biology whose task is to examine the tissues of animals, so, no skin tissue, histology cannot testify for evolution. But then what we see in the Natural History Museum, and the history books? Ivan Lissner says:

Hence the incredible stupidity of all attempts to reconstruct the Neanderthal man, or even of Beijing. (MAN, GOD AND MAGIC - New York, 1961, page 304)

Not even once been seen by any scientist a piece of prehistoric man's skin, but then where do these conceptions of caveman with skin covered with hair?

The vast majority of artistic conceptions is based more on imagination than on evidence [...] The artists need to create something between ape and human; the older is said to be the specimen; the more apelike make it. (SCIENCE DIGEST, April 1981, page 41).

ART OR SCIENCE?

Figures Zinjanthropus below, show how it is impossible to reconstruct hair, eyes, nose, lips and facial expression as having pieces basic bones. However, the media propagates the theory of evolution concept as the purest science. Who does not agree with the theory of evolution is taxed to illiterate and superstitious person.

Zinjanthropus as designed and published in the magazine "National Geographic" in 1960.

18


Zinjanthropus, produced by Maurice Wilson at the request of Dr. Kennedy P. Oakley.

Zinjanthropus whose design was published on April 5, 1964 by the magazine "Sunday Times."

The Zinjanthropus designed by Neave Parker to Dr. LSB Leakey. Copyright, The Illustrated London News & Sketch, Ltd., 09/01/60.

1 - SKIN

The histology study the tissues of living beings and what was found so far is antagonistic to Evolution. Which leaves us angry, however, is the unbiblical belief of evolution, and the worst, receiving the endorsement of scientists without, however, satisfy the requirements needed to be certified as true.

19


As our readers can see, the Ramapithecus and Australopithecus and even 'homos' appearing in prints, show such 'prehistoric men' with hairy leather covering the entire body. However, there is no way to prove that the skin covering the few bones findings were hairy. So Gordon Childe said:

Man has not, and probably never had a hairy leather. (A CULTURAL EVOLUTION OF MAN, Rio de Janeiro, Zahar, p 32)

The man was never as hairy monkey, were also men like us who painted the caves.

IV - CYTOLOGY

1 - CHROMOSOMES

Chromosomes are elements that make up the nucleus of cells, having an important role in heredity, for in them are contained in the GENES. The spiral part of GENES is called chromonema whose number varies according to the tissue, the stage of reproduction and according to species, of which the number of chromosomes is FIXED IN EVERY KIND, for example, we have:

SPECIES - NUMBER OF CHROMOSOMES

Man 46

monkey 48

Coffee 44

Fly drosophila 08

20


Darwin was unaware of the complexity of cells and did not even know what it was DNA.

As we can see the existence and function of chromosomes are more adjusted to the idea of creation than with the idea of evolution, each species has its amount of chromosomes and this establishes a cellular difference from one species to another who testifies in favour of that the Bible says in Genesis 1:11, 12, 21, 24 and 25 "Produce each according to its kind." Many evolutionists cite the number of chromosomes monkey is near the number of men, but that does not certify anything since coffee also has number of chromosomes to the next man.

The process that causes a cell to turn into a human body is mysterious:

"I fear that biologists have to confess that does not have hardly any idea about how this is done. Surely it must involve something more than merely chemical processes. "(THE NATURE OF LIFE, 1962, page 67)

The process of developing a cell in a full body suggests an intelligent highly complex program, never by chance:

The whole process looks very much to the development of an organized structure, starting from a relatively simple system. The protein molecules and fat in the yolk appear to be placed in position to form an orderly and highly complex system, somewhat similar to the process by which a house is built of brick, wood, and glass, according to a predetermined plan [...] The machine seems to work, in other words, a highly intentional, and has applied to it the term 'organizer' [....]. There seems to be a guiding principle in operation. (SCIENCE TODAY, page 25, 26)

2 - NUMBERS AND DIMENSIONS OF CELLS

In 1665 the scientist Robert Hooke discovered cell (this word means 'voids'), later, it was discovered that all living beings, animals or

21


plants are formed by cells, only certain creatures have a cell as is the case of amoebae, mushrooms, and certain bacteria. There are also multicellular beings who are most in the world. Man is comprised of more than one quadrillion cells. Although we can say with some differences in the dimensions of the cells are astounding, for example, a human ovum is microscopic, having only 0,200mm (200 microns), while the chicken egg is a single cell!

CELL REPRODUCTION: exorbitant differences in how these species, leads us to accept the creation or evolution as a fact?

GOD, THE LIFE ARCHITECT: The DNA is similar to a magnetic tape containing detailed architectural plans. No doubt, a more intelligent mind that human invented the DNA.

3 - DATABASE CELL

Evolutionists cannot prove that a cell has evolved, as this particle, although microscopic, has amazing information, able to build the anatomy of all living beings. I wonder who did the most complex database program of the universe?

CELL is like a city that keeps in a library, a large encyclopedia of 46 volumes: The 23 pairs of chromosomes.

The CHROMOSOME is like a book with thousands of pages where all the genetic information of the human body.

The GENE and as a section on how to synthesize proteins (skin color, for example, is a result of the presence or absence of melanin).

22


The TRIPLET is like a word that specifies an amino acid or stop a chemical reaction or the beginning of another process.

The NUCLEOTIDE is like a letter that describes everything that is alive.

4 – BACTERIAL FLAGELLUM

Engines arise not alone...

Several scientists show the reasons that made him abandon the theory of evolution in the way of Darwin. New scientific discoveries in biochemistry, especially considering the amino acids and their functions in the body, and the study of the bacterial flagellum, should instigate and persuade scholars to consider the argument that the complexity of life agents, can only be explained by an intelligent creator, fate could not have created these extremely complex systems of life. Darwin did not have access to this information under the microscope. Today, many scientists embrace the concept of intelligent design, this means: There was an intelligent creator who designed life.

The publication the Evolution Controversy says: "The bacterial flagellum has a rotor motor that rotates at a speed of 6000 to 17,000 rpm. Even more surprising is that it can change direction with just a quarter turn and then turn the 17,000 rpm in the other direction "New Scientist magazine calls the bacterial flagellum of" excellent example of complicated molecular system - one complex nanomachine is beyond the skill of any human engineer. "

According to biochemist Michael Behe, the bacterial flagellum is also an irreducibly complex system. This means that this system will only be able to perform its basic function if all parts are present and working interactively. As we remove any of its parts, it ceases to perform its basic function […].

Behe likes to use the example of the trap. The trap is a mechanism designed to catch rats. This mechanism consists of a few parts that work interactively. The joint work of these parts causes the trap to work and perform its function. If any of these parts are missing, the trap will not work. Therefore, it is essential that all parts are present for the mousetrap to work.

Thus, the bacterial flagellum is a mechanism that cannot have evolved. According the evolution, the flagellar motor was forming gradually. Their working parties would have emerged gradually. As the flagellar motor only works if it is complete, the lack of any of its parts become useless or inoperative system. As a useless structure could be preserved by natural selection? Evolutionists try to answer this question claiming that the incomplete flagellar motor could have had other uses. For this resort to Co-Option:

23


The Intelligent Design critics generally resort to the theory of co-option in an attempt to "prove" that the flagellar motor is derived from natural and random processes. But there is a flaw in this theory: According to Co-Option, the bacterial flagellum was formed with other parts of the oldest molecular machines. We know that the bacterial flagellum is formed by 40 structural parts. Ten of these parts were found in another molecular machine (a bacterium that has a kind of syringe instead of flagellum). However, the other 30 shares are unique (only exist in the bacterial flagellum). If the argument is that natural selection used parts of other molecular machines that existed before the flagellum, where she got these 30 unique parts? (http://guerrovacriacionismo.spaceblog.com.br/1802247/Motores-Nao-Surgem-Sozinhos-Flagelo-Bacteriano/)

V - PHYSIOLOGY

1 - MACHINE VOCAL

One of the most difficult points of evolutionists explains is the language used by man and animals are far from resembling. According to the theory of evolution, shrews (a type of mouse) changing their habitat, were living in the forests, up in the trees, and eventually, became chimpanzees and gorillas and continued eating plant foods. Those who were for the savannah, began to eat with effort, because the foods were dispersed, and this, according to the theory of evolution, has eased the development of intelligence, and the fact that walking upright, would have changed the physiology of the vocal tract. However, even if we considered these mere assumptions as facts, there are problems insoluble for the argument of evolution, as published in the magazine Superinteressante in one of his articles about evolution:

If that explains how did the unit capable of emitting around 50 basic sounds [...]. does not explain why humans began to use it to communicate with one another. In addition, it is unknown when the vocal tract began to be used to produce language. (SUPERINTERESSANTE)

After several studies with chimpanzees, especially with the monkey Washoe, scientists reached the following conclusions:

Chimpanzees are able to associate symbols to objects, but not true sentences make much less to express ideas. While a child can learn any language has spoken around her, chimpanzees are not able even to utter the most rudimentary forms of human languages. In fact, there are many cases of children who speak several languages. One of those, with only five years, spoke eight languages fluently. Commenting on the vocal tract and

24


the ability to communicate, a scholar ended: Remains the most inexplicable aspect of evolution. (THE BRAIN: THE LAST FRONTIER, p 59, 69)

Taking into account the physiological and linguistic aspects of the language of men, the magazine Science News Letter published the following news:

States Dr. Mason, an expert on American languages: The idea that the 'wild' speak in a series of grunts and cannot express many concepts 'civilized' is completely wrong [...]. The evolution of language, found Dr. Manson, is extremely otherwise of biological evolution. Language evolved towards the complex to the simple. (SCIENCE NEWSLETTER, 03/09/1955)

This statement of Dr. Mason fits more with the creation and degeneration of the languages of the Theory of Evolution.

The monkey Washoe learned 150 meanings of the language of the deaf and dumb, but unlike men, the monkey cannot express ideas, man is different, because it was created with the breath of God, the spirit, which gives man incomparable attributes.

Human organs are many well defined and highly complex or they have already been created with these mechanisms, or for millions of years were deformed and useless organs. For example, one eye is comprised of many intricate parts, missing them or without being fully formed; the vision is useless to see. So is unimaginable bodies in a slow evolution (thousands or millions of years) until they are ready.

25


EAR is a perfect machine than a recorder. The recorder has evolved, or was created by an intelligent mind?

EYE is a perfect machine than any camera or camcorder. These machines have evolved by themselves or were created by an intelligent mind?

UTERUS is a perfect machine than any industrial machine, machines emerged spontaneously or were designed by an intelligent mind?

Vocal tract is a perfect machine than any sound system invented by man, so the logic forces me to accept that life and man are on the planet because they were created and not because they evolved in a disorderly manner and without purpose.

26


Human organs are properly set in a perfect organization so that all functions as a supermachine. Cars are infinitely simpler. Do you believe that there is any car that evolved alone, out of nowhere, by chance, without intelligent intervention?

SMELL is such a complex device that recently only, men were able to imitate the Creator and invented the chemical smell sensor. But it is a ridiculous device close to what God has done. Our nose has 20 million sensory cells. Is good for you? Or think little? Well, God made a pet (dog) which has about 100 million sensory cells connected to the central nervous system. Is good for you? Do you think all this wiring is by chance?

27


HEART is perfect than any engine. It works until the last day of our lives, is an extremely strong muscle, his strength pumps blood around the body. Every day your heart must beat more than 100,000 times to pump 1800 liters of blood for more than 60,000 miles of blood vessels. Do you know any engine as perfect as the heart? Automotive and industrial engines are simple near the heart. Then the heart appeared slow and gradual chemical reaction to perfect and is up and running? As the animals lived while the heart was evolving? Will the engines of Mercedes and Ferrari emerged chaos, out of nowhere, without any engineer put your hand?

RESPIRATORY SYSTEM human is perfect than carburetor and automotive electronic injection. But the evolutionist cannot realize that the more complex a machine, more intelligent was their creator. So I would attribute to chance the appearance of the respiratory system and the carburetor I assign as the work of an intelligent mind? We need to stop being induced pseudo-intellectuals who want to 'rape' our brain, forcing us to believe in a theory that attacks the reason and common sense. If you are an atheist, it's your problem! But use logical reasoning and not by robotic evolutionary propaganda that plague the media and the contemporary educational system.

28


VI - STOICHIOMETRY

In biology, there is the branch of stoichiometry studying the chemicals in living things. Chemists have extensive knowledge of these substances and are not surprising that they can create drugs that help a weakened life, but if life could EVOLVE chemical material, today we would have human being produced in laboratories simply mixing chemicals and not in the womb of woman as it has been from the beginning. If the theory of evolution was scientifically proven, chemists and biologists should create a living being water-based, minerals, carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and enzymes. But they cannot and will. Genetic manipulation, artificial insemination or ‘in vitro’ fertilization are not even close to what can be defined as creating life in the laboratory from inanimate material or substance as preach evolutionists, it never happened. Therefore, astronomer Robert Jastrow said:

To the chagrin of them, scientists do not have need of an answer, because chemists have never had success in reproducing the experience of nature on the creation of life from inanimate matter. Scientists do not know how it happened. (THE ENCHANTED LOOM: MIND IN THE UNIVERSE, New York, 1981, p 18)

The Creator (God) designed the sperm as drivers of animal life at fertilization and mating process.

1 - DNA

The deoxyribonucleic acid is the substance responsible for the construction of all cells of living beings. Some writers call the DNA of microscopic computer. Here are some concepts that divine wonder:

The deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is an organic compound whose molecules contain the genetic instructions that coordinate the development and functioning of all living organisms and some viruses, and bringing the hereditary characteristics of each living being. Its main role is to store the necessary information for the construction of proteins and RNAs. DNA segments that contain the genetic information are called genes. The rest of the DNA sequence has structural significance or is involved in regulating the use of genetic information. (WIKIPEDIA, accessed 31/12/2014)

29


Your personal DNA finds itself splashed across his body in about 60 trillion dots - the average number of living cells in the adult human [...]. Surprisingly, the DNA molecule has a basically simple. It consists of two interlaced aspire, like the tape queued atoms connected together at regular intervals by crosspieces - like a spiral staircase [...]. There is a long slender logic in the form of DNA; give you the ability similar to magnetic tape recording, storing the huge amount of information needed for life. Even the strands of DNA are sugar and phosphate; stair sleepers snail are composed of nitrogen, His varied in sequence strands of DNA directs the events that cause the body to grow - very similar to the way the tiny changes in magnetic tape producing, according to their order, the sounds of music [...]. Dr. Beadle says that if the instructions encoded in the DNA of a single human cell were translated into English, would fill an encyclopedia of 1,000 volumes.

While the DNA within the nucleus is giving orders that stimulate growth, digestion, heartbeat, thought and feeling. Follows its own intrinsic plan that has brought you through the corridors of time. It makes no changes to this plan, unless they imposed on it by radiation accidents or from outside the cell. (READER DIGEST, October and 1962: 144 and 148)

The conclusion by the statement that DNA does not allow the organism to develop outside the pre-established pattern, radiation coming from outside the cell could not make any changes that were not harmful.

If the code is truly universal [...], is not subject to mutation. (Scientific American, October 1963).

DNA is the principal agent of the fabrication of living beings and is the time it reaches the sperm nucleus of the egg that is provided by the combinations cells of man and woman. In the Bible, the book of Psalms 139.14-16 there is a reference to the DNA of the mechanism:

I praise you because fearfully and wonderfully made, marvelous are thy works, and my soul knoweth right well. My frame was not hidden, when I was made in secret, and woven together in the depths of the earth. Your eyes saw my unformed body, and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were formed day to day, when as yet there was none of them.

In the magazine "LIFE" was published an article showing the greatness of DNA, which has only one explanation for this micro engineer - GOD.

The egg fertilized contains in its tiny core not only all the genetic instructions for the development of a human body, but also protective equipment - Amino Acid, umbilical cord, placenta and all that makes possible the existence of the embryo in the womb. (LIFE, 30.04.1965).

Note well that inanimate matter cannot reproducer inanimate matter, much less produce animate matter. The fact of inanimate matter contain

30


enzymes and proteins, which in turn are essential substances to living beings, not scientifically justified belief in evolution. The theory of evolution cannot explain how life arose without having to disregard these biological laws. We, creationists, agreed to gender, number and degree to the REAL science, as if life comes from life, as taught Pasteur, then we are right to say that God is the Creator of all living things. As for the origin of God, that is no problem for us to explain, for God, according to the Bible, is so powerful that it exists for all eternity, and to understand the existence of God, just we use the MATH explanation of negative numbers that have not end. Likewise, God is the Lord of mathematics and superior to it, has no beginning or end (negative and positive numbers are infinite, as the past and the future of God). We conclude that the only scientific and philosophical explanation for the existence of life is God. So the Bible calls Jesus THE LIFE AUTHOR (Acts 3:15).

As the science is revealing the mysteries of the human body and its high complexity, the more it becomes clear that this is not by chance. Only a mind, a trillion times higher ours could have created the energy, matter and living beings. God, the Lord of Life.

CELL CONTROL

Cancer is the abnormal growth of a cell that can generate a tumor. Daily, DNA does trace the cell to detect anomalies, exercising, a cell control to prevent the degeneration of the cell.

All our cells have mechanisms to prevent neoplastic transformation. These mechanisms are known as control systems can be divided into: mechanical, chemical and genetic systems. One the concepts that most people are unaware of is that when we have a proliferation of neoplastic cells, many of them are destroyed by these control systems, clearly for some reason, for the other remaining cancer cells, these same systems not work, but we would not have the cancer, right? A very efficient mechanical

31


system is called contact inhibition. When cells in a tissue that is repairing, for example, know the time to stop dividing not to go beyond the ordinary? The answer is in touch! When cells that are dividing abut immediately stop their division. (UNIMES, Degree in Biology from the Metropolitan University of Santos, 2012)

I understand that these control systems that destroy the cancer cells are systems created by God so that life could develop. It is not by chance and by accident that determined these rules in the DNA. God made it the program that makes the cells rotate this program and implement what is already determined by Him.

VII - BIODYNAMICS

Biodynamic studies the chemical changes in living things. Today we know how much is sophisticated living organism and as a species evolved into another is extremely difficult to explain and even worse, try. Given this recent discovery, Loren Eiseley said:

Intensified effort revealed that the very amoeba, supposedly simple, was a complex plant, a chemical plant of auto operation. The concept that was just a simple bubble, whose chemical composition, once discovered, will allow us to start instantly up the viral process, have proved at best, monstrous caricatures of truth. With the failure of these efforts, the science was in the embarrassing position of having to postulate theories of origins of life that she could not demonstrate. After censor theologian, for your confidence on myth and miracle, science found itself in the position that had the nothing enviable, of having to create their mythology. (A HUGE DAY, p 164)

1 - COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY

No serious scientist should consider the biochemical argument compared as quoted below:

Fish eliminate ammonia, amphibians eliminate urea, and reptiles eliminate uric acid. Since an avian embryo initially removes ammonia, urea later, and finally, uric acid; is a repetition of phylogenetic nitrogen metabolism. (CERED, Goal collection, p 72)

Evolutionists seek create outlandish theories about evidence of such a development. An example is the analogy cited above. But think of a fable about the evolutionary origin of the car. Imagine that someone claimed that the car made of sheet metal was not built in the metallurgical, or the sheet made in steel, but that the following explanation: "There were several metal bedpans, where almost all the

32


natural selection eventually succumbed not survive oxidation, but some managed to adapt and become in wheelbarrows, the evolutionary process followed for a long time, some links that prove this evolution is the 'stove-erectus', and later, as measuring 1.70 meter the ‘refrigerator cro-magnon’ and finally the ‘auto-sapiens’ was the crowning of evolution."

If you think this absurd explanation, I also think!

2 - FEATURE OF LIVING

Studying biodynamic we are led to consider all the differences among living things and inanimate materials. Such differences are so great that any intelligent person will wonder: How life can come from inanimate matter? And that continues with no evolution of ore to organic life? Let's look at the differences among the ore and the life:

A - CHEMICAL COMPOSITION

The ore is usually comprised of an element (iron, gold, silver), while no living element, even microscopic cell, it consists of various elements such as carbon, hydrogen, iron, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, potassium and magnesium. In addition, living organisms synthesize organic substances and, hence, are constantly changing their chemical composition, as the minerals, their compositions are fixed.

B - CELL ORGANIZATION

The cellular structure that makes up living things distinguishes them from minerals. The multicellular beings still behave as a unit because the mechanism of self-regulation establishing cooperation among all parties. The inanimate matter does not have these mechanisms.

C - METABOLISM

The minerals do not have the metabolic capacity which is the process to obtain food (assimilation), and the process of releasing this chemical energy activities and removing products that are expelled (dissimilation). These are the characteristics of living things that distinguishes it from inanimate materials.

D - REPRODUCTION

33


Minerals do not reproduce, unlike the living beings that the natural processes produce a being like him.

E - GROWTH

Living beings can regenerate parts destroyed; in large animals this process is called healing. Inanimate materials are destroyed by erosion and have no ability to restore itself.

F - CYCLE VITAL

All living things have a life cycle that is born, grows, reproduces, ages and dies.

G - STIMULUS

All living matter reacts to external variations, for example: If you play water in the cat he runs, but the minerals do not react to any external variation.

H - ADAPTATION

Living beings react internally adapting to the environment, inanimate matter does not react chemically looking to adapt to the environment.

ABSTRACT

Many biology textbooks bring this explanation of living beings. However, despite these insurmountable differences between living beings and inanimate, the theory of evolution insists that life arose from inanimate matter, making an attack on biology.

VIII - ONTOGENY

There is a principle in the biogenesis that says. "Life comes from life" All the research done so far in all branches of biology support this statement. The hen lays an egg and the egg to go way the growing chick, becomes a chicken, and this is the process of birth, growth and reproduction is repeated indefinitely, no sparrow or ostrich out of the hen's egg, let alone an inanimate matter.

34


1 - EMBRYOLOGY

Embryology is branch of ontogeny and as its name says, studying the embryo. Evolutionists use the argument of embryology compared to prove the theory of evolution.

Animals of different species, when in the embryonic stage, are very similar [...]. The explanation is that we descended from animals where such bodies were functional. (GENETICS AND EVOLUTION, Cered, p 72).

The development of embryos shows that each takes the form according to its kind. The embryology compared supports the creation or evolution? When an architect begins to outline a project, it starts with simple lines until a succession of traces, leads to the development of specific projects. So God created life, the first divine trait is the first embryonic stage, after the divine computer program (DNA) will designing specific lines going shaping life forms according to its kind.

Wanting to prove the theory of evolution because the embryos are similar is a weak argument that supposedly can only be a joke, but in the classroom, students and teachers have to accept the doctrine of the school curriculum with the same degree of belief that any religious, so it is said that: "More important to get knowledge, you have the ability to reason and draw conclusions."

Nothing in nature is by chance, see how the Great Scientist designed the egg.

35


IX - GENETIC

Genetics is the part of biology that studies heredity, whose biological mechanism transmits the characteristics of the fathers to the children.

1 - THE INHERITANCE

Heredity is controlled by several independent genes. Was Daven-Port which ranked the two pairs of genes that determine the inheritance. The genes A and B increase the intensity of pigmentation, the pairs of genes taxpayers, represented by capital letters, and non-taxpayers symbolized by lowercase letters

Genes work with scope for variation within species, not progressing to other species. The way passes the genetic heritage reveals the organization of biological elements and this makes us suppose that someone created this system. Genes are created programs, it is not the work of evolutionary chance.

2 - HYBRIDIZATION

The hybrid is one of the greatest proofs that God established genetic boundaries between species preventing animals from different species cross, and when cross not reproduce. But, also, among those who reproduce, the offspring are born dead, and among certain species, hybrids living descendants, are not fruitful more than three generations, and later became sterile.

The first to speak of the importance of crosses between species for the study of heredity was the Greek Aristotle in the third century BC. In the eighteenth century AD, Leuwenhoeck (1632-1723), through experiments with rabbits white and gray, discovered the gene dominance and regressive. Finally, Mendel formulated his laws which established several points of this science.

Let's look at four laws of hybridity:

36


§ 1 - Crossing two hybrids together, in almost all cases not reproduced. When there is reproduction, the offspring are infertile.

§ 2 - The hybrids can reproduce indefinitely in phanerogams plants, higher plants and the following animals: camel one hump with camel two humps and rabbits with hares.

§ 3 - The hybrids are fertile, but in 3 or 4 generations at most, between species like the dog and the jackals.

§ 4 - The hybrid refuse the cross.

Importantly, we do not know the details of species division as the vision of God in Genesis 1:12, 21, and 25, however, God established the rule that each species reproduce within their own species. The canine family with its internal variety (dogs, wolves, jackals and foxes) do not mix with the cat family (cats, tiger, lynx and lion). Therefore, among these, nor considering mating and reproduction of offspring. Professor Dobzhansky confirms what the word of God said long ago:

Never saw any individual in respect of which it could be in doubt if it belongs to the species of cats (Felis domestica) or species of lions (Felis leo). The two species are different because of the absence of intermediate. Therefore, one can safely say that any cat is unlike any lion [...]. What has just been said with respect to the species 'domestic felis' and 'felis leo', applies also to numerous other species pairs. Are both between different groups of animals and plants, among the simple structures as well as from the many complexes. The formation of different groups is almost universal that must be considered fundamental characteristics of the organic diversity. (GENETIC AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, p 5:06)

Mare and donkey can produce mule or donkey, but these are sterile because reached the limit of their species.

37


The animals of the same genus may even cross with different species, however, hybridity is the separation mechanism that prevents the development of a new species originated by interbreeding.

In the process of hybridization, crosses between two different species of the same genus (in most cases) in order to combine the best qualities of both [...]. The new hybrid is often stronger than any parent. Sometimes the seed is sterile and requires constant hybridization. ( BIOLOGY FOR TODAY, p 294).

We can conclude this part of our study on the theory of evolution, saying that science has already given its approval with respect to Genesis 1:11 which says: “Give fruit according to its kind" The hybrid rule out the emergence of new species by crossing as said zoologist Richard B. Goldschmidt:

Nowhere is implemented the limits of species, and these limits are separated from the boundaries of the closest species by the impassable gap, which also includes sterility. (THE MATERIAL BASIS OF EVOLUTION, p 168)

New hybrid species exist only in science fiction or pictures by computer manipulation. There was no evolution of species, and at this point there is no species in transition. All species are fully set out in the world, there are no examples in the transitional nature.

Genetic engineering can improve certain characteristics of a species by various processes, especially hybridization, but has never been created in the laboratory a new species of animal or plant that can break the sterility of that new hybrid species. The Creator has placed limits, God is the legislator's genetic code. Pictured above is an example of a wild maize and genetically modified maize compared to the same coin. This is not evolution of the species, is genetic manipulation.

38


3 – MUTATIONS

The contradictions of the Theory of Evolution are everywhere, one of them says that the mutations were important mechanisms for the process of evolution. Proponents acknowledge that humanity has never seen a new species arise under the influence of mutations.

According to the theory of evolution living beings undergo changes, i.e., a species can change over time, some species may become extinct and others appear. Mutations are the main factor responsible for changes that occur in the species. It can be said that the mutation is the raw material of evolution. The mutations are sudden changes of hereditary characters, however the authors of biology treaties agree that never seen a species give rise to another species. (COLLECTION PURPOSE, Cered, Book 2, page 51)

A - LETHAL GENES

The French scientist Lucien Cuénot through experiments with mice proved those mutations when they are not harmful, are lethal, few indeed are beneficial. Among the lethal genes are called thalassemia, microcitemia, phenylketonuria, epiloia, and albinism. Albinism in animals and men is not lethal, but it is deadly in plants. Phenylketonuria, acting on the individual, produces mental retardation and death before reaching sexual maturity. Therefore, the mutation cannot explain the theory of evolution, on the contrary, it serves more to confirm the biblical doctrine of human degeneration (Genesis 6:12) and all species. Mutations are a detrimental factor to life:

Either the natural mutations or induced by artificial means such as radiation [...]. Current evidence suggests that over 99% of mutations are undesirable. (THE NEW ZEALAND HERALD, 1/17/65)

Professor Wallace witness saying:

Changes caused by mutations, in any gene, are rare events. This is a different way of saying those genes ordinarily reproduce accurately. (RADIATION, GENES AND MAN, 1959, p 35)

W. H. Dowdeswell said of the changes:

The mutants discovered in the laboratory, or all of them are recessive, or semidominant, and most cause harmful physiological effects. (THE MECHANISM OF EVOLUTION, p 30)

39


Mutants with superpowers, as the heroes Marvel (X-Men) and new species, only exist in the world of mythology and fiction. We are fans of pure science.

Dr. HJ Muller, Nobel Prize, attested harmful and lethal results of changes:

Most mutations are harmful and lethal; in fact, the good are so rare that we can consider them all harmful. (TIMES, 11/11/1946, p 96)

Most evolutionists believe that the mutation is the raw material of evolution, but it is not what it says the renowned Dr. Dobzhansky:

Most mutations both produced in laboratories with those stored in natural populations, produces deterioration of viability, hereditary diseases and monstrosities. Such changes it seems, can hardly serve as an evolutionary building stone. (GENETIC AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, p 73)

B - EXPERIMENTAL MUTATION

A treaty of biology so explained the experimental mutations: “These experimental mutations have been acquired by the action of chemicals, trauma, graft, bacteria, X-ray and ultraviolet, cosmic rays and atomic energy" Such mutations produced, even the highly intelligent mind of man cannot get a satisfactory result, according concluded the expert horticulturalist, Dr. W.E. Lammer:

My own work on radiation of roses with neutrons describes a technique by which we can induce only irradiated buttons Queen Elizabeth, more mutations than could be found so far for a life of research from several million non-irradiated buttons. Without exception, all induced mutations were found defective or weaker than the Queen Elizabeth roses [...]. Hardly could compete biologically in view of the reduced force and partial sterility. (THE CREACIONIST).

Mutations originated from the atomic explosion in 1945 in Japan, generated deformities, atrophy and deaths. Drug use and other chemicals by pregnant women result in irreparable harm in the embryo, that when not dies, is born with many health problems; even the smoke that is accepted by society causes mutations that are always harmful. Mutations are genetic accidents and as always all accidents, they are harmful. The

40


results of such experimental mutations using chemicals witness their misdeeds to living things: chickens without feathers, children without arms and legs, fish with one eye, insects with different colored eyes of its kind, birds with reduced wings. Who would argue that such mutations worked for the evolution of species?

C - FREQUENCY OF MUTATION

The theory of evolution cannot prove its authenticity through experiences that can be observed, therefore, is to imagine that evolutionists would use the time as a favorable factor to evolution. So the argument most often used to explain the evolution is that it took thousands and millions of years. This is impossible today, with more reason, it was impossible in times past. Let's see what the eminent authorities say about the frequency of changes and the probabilities of whether it results in new species:

Mutations occur rarely. The most genes undergo changes only once every 100,000 or more generations [...]. Researchers estimate that the human gene can remain stable for 2.5 million years [...]. Most mutations are harmful. Some make it impossible for the cells to develop and grow. (WORD BOOK ENCYCLOPEDIA, p 809 volume XIII, p 194 volume IX)

PHYLOGENY

In this chapter, we will study the theories of the origin of life including:

- Spontaneous Generation;

- Inheritance of acquired characters;

- Natural selection;

- Mutations.

1 - THE STORY OF LIVING

The goal of phylogeny is to study the history of living beings, however, only man left written records of their works and achievements in the past, and on this subject we will deal in General History of book from our collection. In fact, there are only animals, they do not build anything for the later generation, and even to his generation. So Jesus

41


said, "Behold the fowls of the air sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them" (Matthew 6:26). No species of animal builds a civilization, a culture, their techniques of hunting have not evolved (carnivores in thousands of years still hunting the same way, did not develop hunting paraphernalia), their houses have not changed (the birds continue to do their nests, each according to its kind). Every living still in their own habitat (fish in the water, a tree planted on the ground, and "each jack to his" and the worm under the earth ...).

While the bird "Rufous-clay" continues to make its home in the same style throughout its existence, without adding one wants compartment one more as a toilet, a kitchen, a maid's room, or a garden in front of your mud house. More conservative evolutionary require more rapid action of "Rufous-clay" because it was expected that after a few millennia, he had already to maked a little windows. And what shall we say of men?

- Man is the absolute master of the four cardinal points: in glaciers, it does the igloo; in the mountains, valleys and plains there your house, are concrete houses on the rocks or wooden stilts over the water; in the desert, he extends his tent; in the metropolis, he raises skyscrapers. Never before has there been living on earth like a man, a masterpiece of God's hand, created especially to be the ruler of the planet.

What about the means of transportation? What animal is compared to humans? The fish still swimming generation after generation, the birds keep flying generation after generation; quadrupeds continue generation after generation walking. And the man? Man walks on two legs like bipedal, subduing the horses, which are quadrupeds, men riding on his back. He also invented and modernized the cart has drawn by equine strength to reduce the weight of the animal and to add more weight of people and goods, pulled by the force of horses and company. Recently, in the history of living things, man invented the cars driven by motors. The man does not have the strength of ant is able to carry objects ten times heavier than its own weight, but it can build trains capable of carrying 10,000 times its own weight. Even without being able to rely on the convenient pneumatic bones, not with the beautiful plumes and feathers of birds, man can fly faster than any bird. While the birds exceed, on average, at 80 km/h; the man with his supersonic airplanes and space shuttles; travels faster than sound, reaching the speed of 20,000 km/h.

42


What else can we say? As a last example, we will cite the case of communications. No animal has progressed creating a new vocabulary. In fact, most of them, nor words can issue. Some emit sounds that are far from a complex language as the men, most of these uses the sound only in the mating parades, like the cat. Perhaps the most intelligent creatures regarding communication, is the CHICKEN, she always shows a great mood by announcing that put an egg...

Evolutionists love to play the trumpet when an animal is bred to the circus show, trying to say that in them intelligence. Teaching a new word to the parrot just proves how much he is automatic and it is unable to maintain, under any circumstances, intelligent communication as man.

Indeed biologists are presenting a great job in research on the behavior of animals, and would not, in any way belittle the work of these professionals. However, it is in this field that proliferates weeds evolutionists in which phylogeny becomes the latest attempt to create a mythological story of living beings through the fantasy lives of prehistoric men.

"Mere assumptions were unfounded the basis of this imaginary story."

43


The variety of the species did not come from evolution, because many of these birds live side by side. Nature was not selective, because God created an integrated ecosystem with all species.

2 - SPONTANEOUS GENERATION

In the Middle Ages, spread abroad the possibility of spontaneous generation that purported could arise living beings of any inanimate materials such as garbage, dirt and mud. There were "experts" that said frogs and mice and other animals could arise wood, straw and air. Imagine that even in modern times, in the eighteenth century, a doctor of Belgium arrived to give a recipe to produce mice in 21 days using a dirty shirt and spreading wheat germ.

The Theory of Spontaneous Generation began to crumble when the biologist and Italian physician Francesco Redi, in 1668 proved by experience that spontaneous generation did not occur in fact. The experiment was to take two pieces of meat by placing a piece in an open bottle and the other he repaired it. After a while, he can observe the emergence of larvae in the open bottle, also noted constant presence of flies who observed the growth of larvae. At the end of the experiment, it was observed that the larvae become like fly the flying around the open bottle. Ended that there was never emergence of living beings from inanimate matter, but due to the deposit of eggs and larvae of insects.

When science class had already discarded the theory of spontaneous generation, John Needhan in 1745 in England, raised discussions on this subject with their new experiences, this time, the improvement of the microscope enabled the discovery of small living organisms, were protozoa as unable to explain the origin of these tiny beings, appealed again to the theory of spontaneous generation, as John Needhan had put broth in various bottles, some open and others closed at the end of a few days, all bottles were with microorganisms.

For over a century, this theory was widely accepted until the French scientist Pasteur prove the falsity of this theory. In 1864, the Academy of Sciences in Paris, Pasteur disproved spontaneous generation, he claimed that life comes from life, agreeing to a great truth taught in the Bible that says, "For with thee is the fountain of all life (Psalm 36.9)."

44


Yes, all life comes from another life and all living things originate from God, the fountain of life. Pasteur proved that microbes that existed on the water were always from another, by mechanism of reproduction. The confirmation was achieved when the broth was first sterilized, sealed and isolating the air. A whole year has passed and when they opened the bottle in front of several scientists has noted that there did not exist microorganisms.

In honor of Pasteur, the sterilization process was called PASTEURIZATION. Thus, the idea of life have provided the inanimate matter was deeply shaken, and the theory of spontaneous generation was discarded.

In fact the theory of evolution is a building without a foundation and without columns, so she does not deserve credibility of smart people. The Superinteressante Brazilian magazine brought an article titled: “Man is born”, it read this statement that fits well with the ridiculous situation of SPONTANEOUS GENERATION:

In this endless search for origins, each new finding, however, seems to increase the area of controversy among experts. Just a fossil is dug or more a genetic laboratory experience, to mess with the building of hypotheses about the evolution of the human race. (SUPERINTERESSANTE Magazine, September 1988, p

46)

Bottle covered and uncovered with decaying flesh. The worms in the flesh come from eggs laid by flies. When the seal prevents entry of flies, worms do not appear.

3 - HERITAGE CHARACTER PURCHASED

The first who tried to explain the theory of evolution of species was Jean Lamarck. His theory was based on the changes that species suffer due to the environment. The first base their arguments was the LAW USE AND DISUSE. For the more we use a part of the body, the more it

45


develops and the parts that are not used, end up atrophying. Based on this law, Lamarck believed that new physical characteristics were transmitted hereditarily to the next generation. Lamarck well explained its THEORY OF HERITAGE CHARACTER ACQUIRED:

A - NECK OF THE GIRAFFE

According to Lamarck, the neck length of this animal originated by the ongoing effort to stretch to reach food in the upper branches of trees.

B - CACTUS

According to Lamarck, plant suffered the same process and acquired the hereditary characteristics. The cactus and other plants of desert climate began to have the current aspect of the need to store water and have acquired this characteristic as the region was drier.

C – THE SNAKES

Also according to Lamarck, long ago, snakes had short legs, but due to the change in the environment, she started to crawl rather than walk.

D - THE FALSEHOOD OF LAMARCK THEORY

The Lamarck's theory began to unravel when practiced an experience as reported at the 18th lesson of Biology of the Brazilian Universal Institute:

There was an experiment with mice, in which they cut the tail of these animals and crossing them later. The descendants were born with tails that were soon cut. Were crossed and again the offspring were born with tails. This was done until the 20 generations. Individuals of the twenty first generations still had the same tails of the first generation. (BRAZILIAN UNIVERSAL INSTITUTE, 18th Biology lesson)

How were scientifically proven in 20 generations, the new features inflicted in mice were not transmitted hereditarily, thus proving the impossibility of the evolution of new species. De Beer commented on the impact of the failure of Lamarck's theory:

No one would have thought of doubt that, by the end of the nineteenth century , the number of men, before the nineteenth century that rejected the inheritance of acquired characteristics could be counted on the fingers of one hand. (CHARLES DARWIN, p 163)

In 1996 was published a retrospective of the scientific community, and explained why Lamarck's theory was wrong:

46


The acquired characters are not inherited as environmental factors (which may not affect the genes in the sex cells) cannot influence the next generation. (COMPENDIUM RETROSPECTIVE OF BIOLOGY 1996: 304 and 305)

Let us also a more detailed explanation of the impossibility of evolution of Lamarck in the geneticist HJ Muller, Nobel Prize winner, explains:

Despite the influence of the environment on the body modification as a whole, and even their plasma cells, the genes in the germ cells of the body retains its original structure without specific changes caused by the body modification, so that when the individual reproduces, transmits its progeny, genes not affected by its own acquired characters. (ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA, volume 22, p 988)

Even the Communists rejected Lamarck's ideas, as reported the "Times" magazine, commenting on the following reasons:

Heredity is controlled by genes in reproductive cells and remains unchanged during the life of the individual. (Times, 12/02/1965)

According to Lamarck, forced to eat leaves and buds on the trees, the giraffe is forced continually to stretch up. This habit kept for long periods and by all individuals of the race resulted in the neck stretching.

Teething horse

47


Teething cow

The horse has superior incisors; the cow does not have them. Both the horse and the cow feed the same food and exist side by side. There is no sense in the event of a have evolved with superior incisors and another not. The environment does not influence the genotypes of living beings. Lamarck was wrong.

4 - NATURAL SELECTION

Darwin who lived in the nineteenth century revolutionized the world with his theory of evolution. In 1859 he published in his book "The Origin of Species" his explanation of the evolution of the process called "Natural Selection". Here are the mains points of the theory:

A - In a given environment, individuals endowed with favorable variations will be better able to survive than those with unfavorable variations. Thus, favorable variations are transmitted to offspring and, accumulating over time, give rise to big differences.

B - The process of natural selection imposed by the environment, and continued for several generations produces more and more perfect and complex adaptations, determining thus a progressive process.

Natural selection also leaves much to be desired because it does not explain the fact that animals of all sizes and as varied coexist in the same biome without the disappearance of the weakest. The ecosystem explains how a living being depends on others. If evolution were true, there would be serious disturbances in the ecosystem. It is concluded that the ecosystem pleads in favor of belief in creation and not evolution.

In fact, the findings of Darwin do not seem to be reasonable. Consider:

48


On one of his trips by South America, Darwin came to the archipelago of the Galapagos Islands, noting that there should have been a selection in nature, because in some islands only larger turtles appear to have survived, and in others only the smallest . This variation in individuals of the same species is used as the basis for his theory, according to which new species are produced by Natural Selection (Brazilian Universal Institute, lesson 18, page 4).

The fact that large turtles live on an island and small turtles in another, this is evidence for the theory of evolution? No wonder that JD Thomas rebukes evolutionary scientism saying:

There is a demonstrable scientific law, but only an interpretation of certain fact and therefore is only a belief on the part of those who sustains it. (FACTS AND FAITH, 1965, p 142)

Even embarrassing is the inquisition of Dr. Mellersh that says:

According to Darwinian theory, can sustain the interviewer, any change must be with IMMEDIATE value for its owner to give you a better chance of survival than their peers. What good is an eye still in training, or forelimbs shaking up weakly, waiting for wings? (THE STORY OF LIFE, 1958, p 237 and 242)

Natural selection is so irrational, so aimless... Commenting on natural selection, the editors of the 18th lesson of the IUB said:

(Darwin) did not find a scientific explanation to the origin of the variability of organisms. (Brazilian Universal Institute)

LEAVES TYPES

God created the leaves of plants as wanted, in countries with high biodiversity, all varieties coexist side by side, there is no natural selection determines the appearance of new species.

49


5 - MUTATION

The theory of evolution could not be sustained, nor with the theory of Spontaneous Generation, nor with the theory of characters Acquired, nor with Natural Selection. With De Vries came the fourth hypothesis, the mutation. By changing both the explanations of the phenomenon of evolution, JD Thomas rightly qualifies the theory of evolution as a philosophical, not scientific study.

Evolution is an interpretation that has not been proven: So it's just a belief based on philosophical conclusions, rather than scientific facts. (FACTS AND FAITH, page 139)

The Dutch biologist De Vries concluded that the mutation was the process of evolution, based on experiments with Oenothera Lamarckian plant. In the cultivation of this plant, he realized that appeared suddenly different characteristics, which were named MUTATION.

In the 18th lesson, page 10, of the Brazilian Universal Institute is argued that:

"Some authors deny the evolutionary role of mutations, stating that the most favorable mutations emerged already and was fixed over time, and because of this, new mutations that appear now are generally deleterious (harmful to health) to the body."

As we see, evolutionists cannot get to a philosophical consensus, let alone prove their claims with scientific facts.

Mutations are not evolutionary factors, but degenerative and harmful. The DOWN SYNDROME is the result of a genetic mutation, the main symptoms of this mutation are: Intellectual Quotient 15 to 29, continuous transverse crease in the palm of the hand, a single crease on the little finger, inflammation of the eyelids.

Typically, humans have 46 chromosomes in their cells, which come in 23 pairs. Children suffering from Down's syndrome have 47 chromosomes, because they have three copies of chromosome 21 instead of two. What this extra copy of chromosome cause the body varies according to the length of the copy, of the gene family of the child, as well as environmental factors and other probabilities. (Http://www.minhavida.com.br/saude/temas/sindrome-de-down, accessed 31/12/2014)

50


De Beer says the following:

Many of the mutations had fatal results and killed the organisms that had [...]. And instead of passing improvements in adaptation, the changes seemed to be pathological, and offered no explanation of how they came about and how the adjustments were improved. The result was that during the first 20 years of the twentieth century, studies and theories of evolution were in a state of confusion. (CHARLES DARWIN, p 182)

Mutations are genetic accidents in almost all cases are harmful. To date, the theory of evolution did not get the endorsement of science. The Biology Retrospective Compendium shows how fragile evolutionary theories:

Since the theory of Lamarck (Acquired Characters) has been proven false, it is only of historical interest. Darwin's theory (Natural Selection) not satisfactorily explain the origin and the inheritance of variations... The De Vries theory (Major Mutation) was shown weak. (REVIEW TEXT IN BIOLOGY, p 363)

MUTATION PHOTO

Here's what the mutation can do. The mutation is an evolutionary or regressive factor?

51


SCHOOL CURRICULUM FORCES THE TEACHING OF EVOLUTION, CREATIONISTS PROTEST.

Regardless of the facts that testify to the creationism, teachers continue ONLY teaching evolution. Educational policies and teaching guidelines require teachers to follow the official curriculum that rule out the possibility of creation as an explanation of the universe and of life on Earth.

The different animal breeds of the same species are explained by the creative ability of God in his creationist work and full of diversity. Sheep with and without horns live in the same environment; we do not fantasize a mythological reason of an evolution of the species.

52


GIRAFFE AND SHEEP

French scientists ask, can coexist side by side, two cousins, each fitter than the other? Does survived because his neck is longer? And the other because your neck is shorter?

6 - THE STAGES OF EVOLUTION

The scientific authorities disagree on almost every point of the theory of evolution. Let's see what experts say about each step:

THE ORIGIN OF LIFE

"At least ¾ of the book of the Ages recorded in Earth's crust are blank pages." (The world in which we live)

CELL ORGANISMS

"The fossil record still clueless of the preliminary stages of development of cellular organisms." (Red Giants and White Dwarfs)

VEGETABLES

"Many botanists look at the fossil record as a source of information. But... there is not much help in discoveries... There is not evidence of ancestor." (The Natural History of Palm Trees)

INSECTS

53


"The fossil record does not give any information on the origin of insects." (Encyclopedia Britannica)

VERTEBRATES

"The fossil remains, in any case, does not give information on the origin of vertebrates." (Encyclopaedia Britannica)

FISH

"We do not know LINK that connect this new animal with previous form of life." (Wonders and Mysteries of the Animal World)

FISH TO AMPHIBIANS

"Exactly how or why they evolved so, probably never know." (Fish)

OF THE AMPHIBIANS REPTILES

"One of the frustrations of the fossil record of the history of vertebrates in this small sample of the evolution of reptiles." (The Reptiles)

REPTILES OF THE BIRDS

"The transition from reptiles to birds is the weakest in documentation." (Processes of Organic Evolution)

MONKEYS

"Modern apes, for a moment, seem to appear suddenly. They do not have a past in the fossil record. "(Science Digest)

THE MONKEY TO MAN

"There are no fossils or other physical evidence clearly linking the man with the monkey." (Science Digest)

7 - BIPEDALISM

The theory of evolution seeks to support their beliefs sabotaging all biological sciences, but Paleontology is the most requested. Evolutionary ideas 'bipedalism' is another of the Machiavellian theories that will not

54


take science to progress at all. The bipedalism is the characteristic of the human species which allows them to move about with just the two lower limbs. This uniqueness of man compared to primates who need the arms to walk and the habit of the latter to live in trees distinguishes man from primates. The explanations began to appear...

A - HANDLING TOOLS

Scientists unbiased admit they do not know the reason that would primates to stop walking four. Another theory was accepted for a long time, this is the theory of handling utensils, which stated that when primates began to hold the objects needed to take the upper members soil. However new contradictions arose because, chronologically, the manufacture of tools appeared only two million years after the man walk upright.

B - FOOD TRUCKS

Another theory tried to explain why man stopped walking four, this was called 'theory of food transport. It thought that while the monkey mother took care of the puppies, the monkey father went to the forest for food, and to bring food, he walked upright; but fossil findings showed that this assumption was more fictitious than scientific.

C - INSOLATION

This theory originated in the 1980s, by Professor of Liverpool, England, Peter Wheeler. According to Wheeler, walking four, the body became more exposed to the heat of the sun and standing, the exposed area would be lower. Wheeler himself said: "Stand up is the ideal way to keep the cold walks unmanned Ecuadorian landscape."

However, this theory has its objections. First: Why prehistoric men in cold regions, and less hot also wanted to stand? Second, almost all species have a physiological cooling system that keeps the blood temperature in a bearable level, so it is unnecessary to remain standing for the blood to circulate normally. Third: Why also other animals also sought not stand? - No answer! Because God has created man upright!!!

THE TIME

On the day your child was born, you did not forget. It is not true? Also parents keep in memory the age at which your child started walking.

55


However, evolutionists who created the 'homo-erectus', do not know when your 'little boy' started walking! The journalist and scholar of evolution Boycer Rensberger says, "When exactly the man started to walk on two legs? This is an unanswered question."

Such fossils show that in the primitive world there is evidence of complete and complex life, not a simple world with life forms in transition. The large dinosaurs of old indicate complex forms of life, which is more reasonable with creation than evolution. There were dinosaurs with eight hearts in a special system to pump blood to the top of the head!!!!

XI - BIOGEOGRAPHY

The Biogeography studies the reasons why the animals distribute themselves in this way on the planet. Evolutionists also use this science to find evidence for evolution. They say ADAPTATION factor would also be one mechanism of evolution. Now try to explain the evolution with adaptation, is the same sign of desperation because he could not explain evolution. Simpson said that:

Know that evolution has occurred is one thing, and explain how and why happened is something very different. The HOW and WHY are precisely the issues of concern and call the attention of the whole world wise. (THE MEANING OF EVOLUTION, Yale University Press, p 11)

1 - ADAPTATION

According to evolutionists, when animals move to other regions, little by little, they are undergoing changes which are contributing factors of evolution. As we read this statement, we realize that these distinguished scientists confuse adaptation with evolution. Here are some animals that were used for example to say that geographic factors influenced the evolution of species:

BEAR

The polar bear has evolved from the brown bear, adapting to the cold climate to survive? No way! What happens is adaptation and not evolution. Polar bears captured and bred in captivity in warm regions, show perfect fit. Simply, the pigments of your hair has turned white and

56


have adapted to the climate; like the Europeans are bright, blond hair and blue eyes, adapting to the cold weather; Africans are human identical to the Europeans, only adapting to the climate with dark pigments in the skin, curly hair and black eyes to absorb less light.

FLY

The adaptation that certain flies demonstrated to withstand the effects of insecticide generated more confidence in the theory of evolution. However, what was proved was that there was more resistant flies to a type of venom than others, and this resilience is hereditary, and that there is no evidence for the theory of evolution. In addition, these adaptable flies did not evolve into another species, flies remained until this day. This fact alone proves that some individuals are more adaptable than others. The largest and the least adaptive capacity also occur with men. We have seen many originated northeastern dry climate of Brazil to go to the southeast, cooler weather, they cannot adapt and be constantly sick. They are usually recommended by doctors to return to their land. However, others show high adaptability in any climate and other variables, such as different food, working hours, socioeconomic factors, etc...

An abandoned car cutting up, as inanimate matter tends to decline, not progressing.

57


The disintegration time is not a factor of evolution. Water hitting the rock erodes, the effect is destructive and not constructive or evolutionary.

MOTHS

Evolutionists use the argument of the color change of a species of butterfly, the last 100 years, whose light color that was in abundance decreased compared with another of the same kind of dark color, which increased the number. Evolutionists sought to explain that this change occurred because the dark color survived better to the industrial age, because the pollution darkened the tree trunks with soot, served to camouflage the dark moths; have a light color has become easy victim of birds, causing the number of moths clear decrease the amount of this butterfly. What we see here is a case of variety within the same species, which in certain circumstances favored certain individual over another, there was no evolution of species.

WOODPECKER

An attempt to prove the theory of evolution using as an example the woodpecker:

The woodpecker has two toes on each foot, driven back, that enable to have a firm foothold in the bark of trees, have stiff tail feathers which serve as insurance support, a long beak robust with sticking bark, and a lot of long tongue that reaches out and takes the larvae inside the holes [...]. These adaptations may have arisen during the evolution of the woodpecker. (CHARLES DARWIN)

[email protected]

We are obliged to disagree with this argument, because what need is there of evolution to survive? And why the other short beak of birds and short language did not evolve, and yet survive? And what did the woodpecker to survive before getting these features it has today? In fact, the woodpecker has these characteristics because God has made it so. In the same biome, there may be thousands of species, living in harmony, no need for evolution because they have been created with its own characteristics.

SPARROW

58


Evolutionists take hold of biogeographical science to defend the evolution Sparrow:

The English sparrow introduced from Europe in the United States changed perceptively in their new home; the average size birds increased and were different breeds in incipient local. (GENETIC AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, p 96)

The fact Sparrow increase in size does not prove anything about evolution, but only confirms that living things have the potential to adapt to the environment without ever evolve into a new species. Often, eating habits and the climate forcing the body to adjustments that are perfectly framed in the Creator's plan and programmed within the DNA of each species. Studies show that the stature of men has increased between the late twentieth century and early twenty-first, possibly due to food intake which animals were fed for generations, with growth hormones. This is not evolution. Evolutionists want to see evidence every change, however, such changes are, usually, transitional or even harmful, such as cancer.

The muscular system is a complex network of wires, cannot be the product of chance, but of an Intelligent Designer, someone designed and surgically traced the fibers, then inserted a program recopy the DNA, ‘each according to its kind.’

HORSE

You often read statements of evolutionists claiming that the feeding habits favored the survival of certain species over others, including developing the jaw and changing the skull bone structure (this argument

59


is used with respect to Australopithecus). However, what to conclude about the horse and cow? They are mammals that live side by side and feed on the same grass? Why, then, the horse has upper incisors; and the cow has not? Why an evolve with incisors and another not?

XII - SYSTEMATIC

1 - THE KINGDOMS

The old textbooks classified in the kingdoms: Mineral, Vegetable and Animal. Today (2014) are considered five kingdoms. Of course, the man is ranked in the animal kingdom. However, for us, fundamentalist Christians, human beings, are of particular origin, as created in the image and likeness of God should be classified as a kingdom over.

A - MINERAL KINGDOM

Composed of all inanimate materials such as rocks, precious stones, and sand. In Genesis 1:10, is cited as the "dry land" earth created.

B - VEGETABLE

According to the Scriptures, after God created the mineral kingdom, he established the second kingdom, the vegetables. In Genesis 1:12, the kingdom is represented by all species of plants, flowers, herbs and trees.

C - ANIMAL KINGDOM

If God first created the animals, how they would feed without vegetables? See how God is wise, He is the Father of the ecosystem and thus created the first plant, and only later the animals. Read Genesis 1.20-21.

D – HUMAN KINGDOM

Scientists wicked classified men as animals, however, certain peculiarities of human require them to be reclassified, distinguishing it from all animals. Based on Genesis chapter one, we see man being created separate from animals in verse 26. With the making of the man, closes the work of creation. Thus, since ancient times, no new species was created or came another as a result of evolution.

60


2 - MAN'S CLASSIFICATION

Unfortunately our young people are forced to listen to their teachers say: “we are improved animals.” Therefore, man is so classified;

KINGDOM - Animal

FILO - chordata

CLASS - mammalia

ORDER - primate

FAMILY - hominid

GENDER - Homo

KIND - Homo sapiens

All races descended from the first man and the first woman. Some developed, based on accumulated knowledge. Other progressed for a time, and then regressed. Other finally became extinct. (From the book: Did Man Get Here by Evolution or by Creation?)

3 - FAMILY

In the classification of systematic science we see that human groups are well ordered: kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus and species. Jay Gould paleontologist is convinced that all humans have the same origin, he says:

61


This Eva [...] makes us understand that all human beings are members of the same family, who had been a recent origin in one place. (SUPERINTERESSANTE 09/88, page 50),

Also according to the cited magazine:

To find Eve, the geneticist Rebecca Cann of Hawaii University, working with colleagues at the University of Berkeley, appealed on samples taken of DNA from various parts of the world, the molecule of heredity.

And what is the result of this research? In the same article we have the answer:

Comparing the samples collected from various ethnic groups, scientists ended to be small and trivial differences among the races.

We conclude that the DNA prevents a family living mutates, creating a new family or species, because DNA keeps the organism within preset limits. The DNA is undoubtedly the engineer of the cell as comment in the journal:

If the code is truly universal [...] implying that it remained fixed [...] and is not subject to mutation. (SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 10/62, p 51)

Improves the car in an accident or becomes a higher type? Mutations are compared to accidents in the genetic mechanism, and "good" are so rare that we can consider them all harmful.

4 – KINGDOM PROTISTA - ALGAE

Let us read a brief description of these creatures:

Algae are organisms that were previously included in the kingdom Plantae, but currently belong to the Kingdom Protista, the phycology being (phyco = algae; logy = study) the branch of biology that studies these beings: unicellular or multicellular (filamentous), eukaryotes, photosynthetic and living in freshwater environments (rivers,

62


lakes or damp surfaces) or salt (seas and oceans). (http://www.brasilescola.com/biologia/algas.htm, access, 07.01.2015)

According to the dating methods, the oldest fossils of algae are dated to 500 million years ago in the Paleozoic period. There are over one hundred thousand diatoms (algae) living in the same habitat (water), many of them live side by side. There would be no need for so many species the deciding factor was the selection of species. What explains such variety of diatoms and millions of species living on this planet is the Creator of the universe that has graced this planet with the wonder of your beauty and your diverse ability.

The following was extracted from the Degree in Biology from the Metropolitan University of Santos. The author of the text says that fossils found in rocks dating back 3.5 billion years ago, indicate that cyanobacteria exercising the same function at that time, equal to the present day. Where is the progress there??? Went up so much time, and this living being has not changed its function? Is not this proof of static creation of God and that there is no some biological evolution under way in the universe? Supposedly, 3.5 billion years have passed, and cyanobacteria continue performing photosynthesis just as did the 3.5 billion years ago. Fish still swimming, birds flying, and cyanobacteria performing photosynthesis. There is no evolution of species, this theory of evolution is an excuse to agnostics and atheists justify the existence of life.

In addition to the ecological importance, cyanobacteria also feature great evolutionary importance, because the oldest fossils found date back to about 3.5 billion years old, from Western Australia and South Africa. Both the nature of some of these fossils as the composition chemistry of the rocks in which they were found, indicating that photosynthesis was occurring at that time. (UNIMES, Santos, 2012)

XIII - PALEONTOLOGY

THE PREHISTORIC WORLD

The facts, dating and assumptions about the prehistoric world represent a large puzzle, although each group claims that his theory is the most scientific. Some believe that the Bible itself indicates that there was a pre-Adamic world and that it would have lived prehistoric animals like the landlords. Genesis chapter 1, verse 2 tells of a land "without form and

63


void" and following, God began to create the world in six days. There is also a theological hypothesis pointing that God would be recreating the world in six days, God created the trees, fish, land animals from existing materials such as water and land.

Also, theologians differ on the fact that God has created or "recreated" the world in six days or six eras. Again, the Hebrew vocabulary and hermeneutical rules leave room for there to be ages on the planet, before the creation of man, in which God was creating the species of trees and animals. The fact of the Bible have synthesized six-day creation, was a concise shorthand something as giant as the creation of millions of species. After all, in the Psalms it is written that "one day for God is like a thousand years and a thousand years as one day." The Holy Scriptures relate the genealogy from Adam to Jesus, the course of about four thousand years and more than two thousand years of Jesus until today. At this point, I believe that it is only an interpretation, the literal.

Humanity has no more than about six thousand years. Historical records of the oldest civilizations, lead us to the Sumerians in the region of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, exactly in the same region where God had placed Adam and Eve, according to the Bible. The Holy Scriptures detail the Eden, where it passed the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in what is now Iraq, ancient Mesopotamia, the true cradle of civilization. As I said, the pre-Adamic world is unknown, because the first record of the Bible is that God created the universe (the heavens and the earth), and then in two verse speaks of the earth was formless and empty. Here could even be a great parenthesis of millions of years, or not. I do not have a precise answer. Neither the Bible nor the current science, found concrete footings on what was in the world before Adam. All geologic dating systems are not fully reliable. We are in a field of many chances and we should not defend assumptions as if they were articles of faith, or closed scientific matters.

1 - GEOLOGICAL ERA

A - EARLY AGE

After God created the invisible spiritual beings (Colossians 1.16), He created the visible universe (Genesis 1.1; Job 38.4, 7). We are not

64


convinced of the authenticity of dating methods, but this event is consistent with the early age of one million 200 thousand years ago as the most common hypothesis.

B - PRIMARY AND SECONDARY AGE

God could have created large animals at this period when dinosaurs dominated absolute in this ancient creation? A theological trend sees the possibility of a pre-Adamic world in which dinosaurs would not be part of that creation in Genesis, chapter one, and so the Bible would harmonize with the current theory of the Ages Geological where would have happened this Primary Era was 400 million year old. Another current interpretation believes that not only man, but the Earth has only six thousand years.

Prehistoric animals are not, in fact, prehistoric, but were an integral part of creation described in Genesis, chapter one. There are even strong archaeological evidence for the existence of contemporary men and dinosaurs. Many cave paintings and drawings on ancient vases depict men and dinosaurs living in the same world. There are descriptions in the Middle Ages of animals that are clearly of animals considered prehistoric. In the Book of Job, the description of Leviathan is not compatible with any contemporary animal, but of prehistoric animal. In this issue of the geological ages, I oscillate between one and another theory, because in both, there is no incompatibility with the Bible, depending on the line of interpretation.

C – TERTIARY AGE

If the interpretation of the six days of creation refer to six literal days, these theories of Ages Geological not true and are misinterpretations of the signs found in rocks and layers of earth strata. Many leading scientists have strong arguments that trigger the theory of Ages Geological, a good documentary on the subject is "the Creator Digital Impressions", one of the most respected geologists the world questions the form of dating and calls into question all this theory. However, if the theory of Geological Eras is right, in the same period in which wore on the Tertiary Age, where life disappeared from the planet, causing the great extinction of the dinosaurs, this period corresponds to the fall of Lucifer and one third of the angels that are cast out of heaven down into the earth (Isaiah 14.12-15; Ezekiel 28.13-19). In this period, the Earth became "without form and void" (Genesis 1.2). While Lucifer fell to Earth, also dropped a large meteor that wiped out the primitive life

65


on Earth, and there was a large drop in temperature, forming large masses of ice in the Earth's poles.

D – QUATERNARY AGE

This book discusses the theory of evolution of life and men, but also the existence of dinosaurs, trying to fit them into the story. The problem of the existence of dinosaurs is less conflicting, with respect to the fact that the abundant and complete fossils lead to a consensus of all: The dinosaurs really existed. The discussion goes to the period of the field in which they lived: if they were contemporaries of men; if they existed before human life on Earth; and the cause of the extinction of the dinosaurs? We also discuss if they were extinct before Adam, in the flood, or a gradual extinction was under way? Again, I repeat, if the days of Genesis, chapter one, be literal, will not reconcile the Bible with Geological Ages and would be in check dating systems and interpretations of the evidence of the geological layers. But if the theory of Ages is correct, God created the animals and the man at the end of this period.

2 – CAMBRIAN PERIOD

The Cambrian Period is another point of consensus among all the philosophical, theological and scientific trends, it seems, all the supporters of varied thoughts on the origin of life, see in the Cambrian Period, the real starting point for the origin of almost all species of life on planet Earth. The first evidence of life on planet Earth were found in the Cambrian Period, however, the question is: How did life arise? By the creation or by evolution? Life appears in the Cambrian Period almost instantaneously, that even Darwin admitted:

Why not find deposits rich in fossils belonging to these early periods prior to the Cambrian era? That is a question I cannot give a satisfactory answer. (THE ORIGINS OF SPECIES, 327-329).

The emergence of life so suddenly in the Cambrian Period attests to the moment of creation and not a stage of evolution.

However, before the lower Cambrian, almost no sign of them [...], the appearance of the lower Cambrian fauna [...] can be reasonably called a sudden event. (SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1964)

66


Speaking about the lack of evidence of life before the Cambrian Period, the global direction of Jehovah's Witnesses argues:

I has find the builder who told you that he has laid a solid foundation for the building, but when you investigate, does not see anything, nor concrete, or steel, or wood, or fundamental material of any kind, but just an empty space where it should be a strong foundation? Would find that this empty space is a 'solid foundation' for the building, as it was just 'negative evidence'? No, we cannot escape the scientific facts in this regard. Fossil documents of earth support the sudden creation, not the slow evolution, from primitive forms of life. (CAME MAN TO EXIST FOR EVOLUTION OR THE CREATION?, Watchtower Society, p 44)

The first part of the theory of evolution does not exist and this is very serious; how can we accept as true the result of an arithmetic operation, if the first number and calculations do not exist?

There is no virtually nothing to indicate how these divisions came into being. Thus, the first part of the evolutionary history is missing. (New York Times, 25/10/1964)

Accredited autority have even suggested belief in creation as more scientific theory than the theory of evolution, because that's who said the famous paleontologist Alfred Romer in an article entitled "Darwin and fossils documents."

Below this Cambrian Period, there are vast layers of sediment that would be expected if there were the progenitors of the Cambrian forms. But did not find the [...], one can reasonably say that the overall picture is consistent with the idea of special creation at the beginning of Cambrian times. (NATURAL HISTORY, October 1959, p 467)

3 - MISSING LINK

The theory of evolution is very complicated, even evolutionists no agree one with another, in fact, there are many difficulties to explain the questions about the evolution of a species to another.

A – AEGYPTOPITHECUS

The aegyptopithecus, according to paleontology, was a monkey Egypt that weighed about four pounds and, perhaps, is the ancestor of all primates such as monkey, orangutan, the gibbon, the chimpanzee and the

67


gorilla. But where is the link that connects this monkey with the australopithecus that is like a big gorilla?

A mystery mist, however, separates the aegyptopithecus the australopithecines, about 30 million years younger. Candidate intermediate ancestors abound. The missing are irrefutable evidence. (SUPERINTERESSANTE, September 1988)

Artist's conception of the Shrew 65 million years ago. According to the theory of evolution, this 'mouse' is the ancestor of modern man. There is evidence? Do Not! Believe it!

4 - THE PREHISTORIC MAN

A - RAMAPITHECUS

According to the theory of evolution, would have lived 15 million to eight million years ago, however, there is controversy on this date among evolutionists themselves. Discovered in India, from where it derives its name Rama, the Hindu deity, and Pithecus in Greek means monkey. The journalist and scholar of the origins and of evolution human Boyce Rensberger says: "Traces were also found in Africa and Eurasia; are jaw fragments, with some teeth, all that's left of Ramapithecus.” Boyce adds: "We do not know if it walked on two legs or four, or as was his head. It is impossible to assess the evolution of other parts of your body."

B - A. AFARENSIS

This name has the following meaning: AUSTRALIS comes from Latin and means ‘southern’. The PITHECUS word is the Greek term for 'monkey', and AFARENSIS word refers to 'afar', in Ethiopia, where supposedly the first specimens were found. These copies have existed about three million and 800,000 years ago. It is believed that 2.5 million

68


years ago, the afarensis was divided into two lines, one giving the australopithecus and the other man.

C - AUSTRALOPITHECUS AFRICANUS

In the period between 3.0 and 1.3 million years supposedly lived in Africa. The Astralopithecus Africanus average as their bones 1,30m, their teeth were similar to those of humans. It is assumed that they lived in family groups and orphans were adopted by relatives. The theory of evolution cannot conclude what happened to the African Australopithecus. According to the Center of Educational Resources, Objective collection, number 2, page 79 shows the Australopithecus Africanus as ancestor of modern man. However, Science Digest magazine says: "The Australopithecus Africanus led to a dead end in the evolution [...]". So, you decide whether or not it is his relative....

D - AUSTRALOPITHECUS ROBUSTUS

Australopithecus robustus would 1.50m, according to the bones that are considered to be of this hominid. This name derives from the hypothetical muscular physical aspect, but nobody has ever seen a living or full copy can be considered as 'robustus'? Currently, few believe it to be ancestor of modern man.

E – HOMO HABILIS

According to some, he lived two million years; according to others assume the 1,700 million. As for the 300,000 years difference, what matters? Some say it was 1.60; others say it was 1.25 m. As for the 35 cm apart, what does it matter?

F - HOMO ERECTUS

Homo Erectus also called JAVA MAN, was discovered in 1891 by Eugene Dubois. The "Peking man" or Sinanthropus Pekinensis found in 1920 is also considered 'Homo Erectus'. Some say there's a million years, Homo erectus had a brain 800 cubic centimeters, however, others claim that the cranial capacity was 700 cc. Some say that at the end of this species cranial capacity was 1,300 cc., But others say it was 1,100 cc. It is not known if this was wearing clothes, but lived in caves, and as close to the fossils were found carved in stone objects and rest of ashes, because it was believed that he had mastered the fire.

69


G – HOMO SAPIENS

According to some, there appeared 500,000 years; others assume 70,000 years ago. While some find it possible that this was using the language; others say dogmatically than its predecessor, Homo erectus already did. The production tools demonstrated advances in manufacturing techniques.

H - HOMO NEANDERTHALENSIS

About 30 to 40 million years ago, no one knows for sure, would have disappeared Neanderthal man, whose fossils have been found in Europe, specifically in Germany. Pollen deposited flowers and horns in the tombs indicate that there were religious ideas. The Neanderthals became extinct.

Modern Encyclopedia says that the Neanderthals were not squat, curved and slightly apelike, but they were fully human, fully erect. However, in another header, displays the representation shown here Natural History Museum in Chicago, representing them as squat, curved, rough and somewhat simian, including children!

I – HOMO SAPIENS SAPIENS

According to the theory of evolution would have stemmed the Homo Sapiens, "no one knows for sure where they appeared for the first time," says Boyce Rensberger. Some say that arose 115,000 years ago, others say that arose 70,000 years. Are spaces of time with large differences, which shows that paleontology working with very large margin of error.

J - CRO-MAGNON MAN

70


Also called modern man, this is identified as the hominid population that lived in these last 20,000 years. He dressed and painted in caves.

6 – BIBLICAL PALEONTOLOGY

The attempt to reconcile the Bible with paleontology or vice versa has generated several hypotheses. Let's look at some of them:

A - THE THEORIES

Based on the possibility of one day mean a period of time, some try to associate the six days of creation with six eras that would enable a DIRECTED EVOLUTION OF GOD; others cite biblical references that one day for God is like a thousand years (II Peter 3.8), and conclude that the day (Yom in Hebrew) mentioned in Genesis, chapter one, refers to a period of a thousand years. A third interpretation prefer categorizing Genesis, Chapter one to eleven, as pure mythology. The fourth interpretation is the literal meaning of the text, that in fact, the story of creation as happened in the Bible, without forcing the explanation with elastic exercises to change direction, thus the literal interpretation considers that the existence of life on the planet earth to the dawn of man, everything would have occurred in just 144 hours, or six days. Although it seems absurd, keep in mind that we are talking about the Almighty God, and to make a small planet work in six days is a breeze!

B - OBJECTIONS TO THE THEORIES

Each theory that attempts to harmonize scientific theories with the interpretations of the Bible has its difficulties.

The first and second theories mentioned here have strong objections because interpreting the biblical days of Genesis as symbolic days would be in conflict with:

a - The fact that the Bible always quote "and was evening and morning" (Genesis 1.5, 8, 13, 19, 23 and 31) suggests that Moses was referring to 24-hour days, as this is an idiom of the Jews.

b - There would be no purpose of God make a day last a thousand years, or one Era, since we do not believe in evolution, not addressed, much less random.

71


Believe that Genesis, chapter one to eleven, is myth, is not compatible with our belief in the total inspiration of the Bible. Also because if Adam and Eve did not exist, the whole Bible is meaningless, Jesus is negligible because the whole doctrine of sin and redemption is focused on the decay of the first couple living in a paradisiacal state, but declined and became one lower race with several limitations.

As for the belief that all life arose on earth in six days, bumped the difficulty of reconciling the dating of fossils with the documental and biblical history, for while the dubious dating systems work with projections of hundreds of millions of years, the historical records of humanity (Sumerians and Egyptians) and the Bible show that the history of man on earth is only about six thousand years.

c - BIBLE AND THE FACTS

We believe that the universe has existed for countless years and there was probably a pre-Adamic world, which God has not revealed to men:

The secret things belong to YAHVEH our God, but the things revealed belong to us ... (Deuteronomy 29:29)

Now imagine that men discovered many things were hidden, such as bacteria, cells, DNA and millions of secrets of the universe and life in hiding.

The glory of God to conceal things; but the honor of kings is to search out them. (Proverbs 25.2)

I believe in the Bible and in it there is no lie, but I also believe strongly that it is not revealed all the secrets of the universe and life. It is a manual that leads to redemption through Jesus Christ. These facts of the pre-Adamic world were hidden because adding no more in the plan of salvation, as this is the purpose of God have left the biblical legacy. I admit the possibility of a gap between the prehistoric world and the new world. In Genesis 1.1 God had created the universe and it was already included Planet Earth:

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. (Genesis 1.1)

On this planet, God placed plants, animals, dinosaurs, species of non-human primates.

72


For thus says YAHVEH created the heavens, God himself that formed the earth and made it; he confirmed, did not create it empty, but formed it to be inhabited: I am YAHVEH and no other. (Isaiah 45.18)

Consider that these animals are those represented the period Paleozoic to Cenozoic. With the rebellion of Lucifer and his angels, in a period before Adam, these angelic beings were cast on the earth, causing the sudden death of all creatures. This time is called the CHAOTIC EARTH, for the land lost its shape and beauty with the flora of prehistory and was empty without its diverse fauna.

And the earth was (it was, became) without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. (Genesis 1.2)

In Genesis, chapter one, verse three on, the world was probably rebuilt. In this act of re-creation of the earth, the inanimate world of matter existed as a likely remnant of the pre-Adamic world, including the water was in the composition of the planet (Genesis 1.2). So God only brought back the plant and animal life on the planet. This biblical interpretation is compatible with the theory that there was mass destruction on the planet, before the existence of man. The Bible points of them quite clearly: THE FLOOD UNIVERSAL. In this planetary cataclysm man already existed and survived through Noah and his family; this is evidenced by hundreds of traditions in almost all ancient cultures of the world that make mention of a great flood and few humans who survived. The other great mass destruction, which many scientists identify, speaks of a previous period of human on earth; and the biggest victims were the dinosaurs. This mass destruction in the pre-Adamic period, must match the exile of Lucifer and his followers on the planet Earth. Jesus speaks of this cosmic event where Lucifer fell like lightning on planet Earth.

And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven. (Luke 10:18)

I imagine that God allowed the rebels hit the planet with such a strong energy power that devastated life on the planet; scientists believe that an extraterrestrial cosmic event could have caused this mass slaughter, the theory of a comet collided with Earth involves many fans and coincides with the arrival of these "aliens" on the planet. Continuing the story of planet Earth in the field in which science and the Bible go hand in hand, when God recreated life on the planet, first placing the plants, then animals and on the sixth day, created humankind. Man was created from unique way, different from the animals that were created from the earth, man was molded from dust, but then the biblical narrative

73


says that God breathed into his nostrils, giving you more than the temporal life, but also life with continued existence. That is, never cease to exist. Have eternal life is something else, is infinite durability, beside God. Immortality in the biblical concept is something else, encompasses infinite durability (never ceases to exist), eternal life (being next to God, the Light, the Good) and incorruptibility (can never lose their status as eternal glory).

Man is not an animal being, as proclaim the theory of evolution, he is a spiritual being with flesh and blood guise. See that the Eden Garden was somewhere near the Euphrates and Tigris rivers in Mesopotamia. The Devil already pre-existed before humans. The man would regain the planet to God in a cosmic plot, expelling the devil to their final destination, hell. With cunning, Satan tempted and seduced the man who volitionally disobeyed God's command. As a result, the man lost his spiritual powers, death entered the human kingdom.

I understand that death was already natural for plants and animals, because when Adam ate a radish, beet, had to sacrifice the plant. Some dispute the mass extinction of the dinosaurs as previous fact Adam to believe that death could not exist before him. However, death existed before Adam when Lucifer rebelled, he died for God, for the word death means separation. When God warned Adam and Eve not to eat of the fruit of the tree of life, God said that if they ate, they would surely die. So, you see, God did not promise infinite life to plants and animals... These could have died at any time before the entry of sin in humanity. Death could not only claim the lives of Adam and Eve, if they not sin, because there was divine promise, and the nature of this first couple consisted of auto regeneration, their cells reproduced perfectly, preventing old age, sickness and death, is regenerated organs such as the liver and as the tail lizards. This is another irreconcilable point of the Theory of Evolution and the Bible.

While the theory of evolution speaks of primates that have improved and became modern humans; the Bible speaks of a species with infinite durability, dressed in light, and through sin, degenerated into its nature, suffered deleterious and harmful mutation that is transmitted hereditarily to their offspring, causing her weakness, sickness, old age and death. If human beings were actually the product of evolution, the first thing that nature would have provided, it would be an outer coating to protect it from the cold and heat, but that's not what happened. This lack of external protection of the human body is one of the greatest

74


proofs that we are not the product of evolution, but degeneration. In chapter three of Genesis, we read about the debate between God and humans after the loss of the outer covering:

7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves aprons. 8 - And they heard the voice YAHVEH God walking in the garden in the cool of the day; and hid Adam and his wife the presence of YAHVEH God among the trees of the garden. 9 - And God called YAHVEH to Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? 10 - And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; and I hid myself. 11 - And God said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree of which I commanded you not to eat? 21 - And did YAHVEH God to Adam and his wife coats of skins, and clothed them.

After disobedience, they realized they were no longer with a jacket and saw that they were naked; when God appeared in Eden, the couple claimed that hid because I was naked, God already knew... the couple had sinned, after pronouncing curses that would accompany him during the pilgrimage out of Eden. However, God provided coats of skins and sacrificed a lamb to dress them, pointing to the blood sacrifice offered by Jesus four millennia later. Pay attention: no creature on the planet needs an outer garment, birds have feathers, fish have scales, land animals have hair or shells, but the human being is the one who needs to handle material and to produce a coating for your skin. As the evolutionary process would forget this detail so important? Why men had hair as say the theory of evolution and then lost an extremely important factor in "natural selection", getting totally helpless and unable to survive without a coat?

We can associate the facts with the Bible. In the course of history after the creation of man, many animals and plants have become extinct and others have been adapted as the climate and atmospheric changes. Some animals seem to have died out during the flood or after the flood due to atmospheric changes. These changes in atmospheric layers made that protective layers to dissolve; and the men who lived before the flood almost a thousand years, had the accelerated aging process and lived about 100 years. The process was painful for all creatures and many could not resist these changes. Many dinosaurs that lived with the men in the post-Adamic earth, did not resist and went extinct. The mammoth and saber tooth tiger were some of these. In this biblical vision, all the australopithecus could have lived in the pre-Adamic world, but they were primates, purely animal, were not attached to the descendants of Adam, who are we, humans, genetic heirs of Adam and Eve, not of kind any australopithecus. Probably, many fossils of 'homos' are humans

75


descended from Adam and Eve. There is no evolutionary links, simply because there was no evolution of species.

Skull saber tooth tiger

6 - DATING

The theory of evolution tries to find security in certain dating schemes that somehow can confirm their assumptions. Let us consider now the dating methods:

A - CARBON 14

Living beings during their live absorb carbon 14 through the atmosphere and food. When living things die cease to absorb the C-14 that will gradually disappearing of the remains as bone and wood. It is assumed that about 5,600 years ago, is the C-14 time already disappeared in the mid-materials. With twice this time, would be left quarter of the C-14 in the fossil.

As just described, this method has a short capacity for dating ancient terms, since employment is 50,000 years. Used in the dating of archaeological finds it was noted that most of the objects still contained more than half of the C-14, well within the time period that the Bible gives to the existence of mankind, that is, about six thousand years ago .

However, certain archaeological and paleontological findings beyond the home of six thousand years and causing clash with Biblical chronology. So what was wrong?

Admits the possibility of the Earth's atmosphere is different in ages past, would compromise the C-14 system:

One of the main assumptions of the method of dating with C-14 is that the atmospheric level of radiocarbon remained stable. (SCIENCE, 10/12/1965)

76


Therefore, we should expect failures of the method of C-14, because in fact, the Bible says the Earth's atmosphere was different in the time before the flood, given that it did not rain on the land, among other things.

5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew; because even YAHVEH God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was no man to till the ground. 6 - A steam, however, rose from the earth and watered the whole face of the earth. (Genesis 2.5-6)

When the mass extinction of life in time of Lucifer fall that caused the chaotic period of the Earth, the planet's atmosphere was completely different, making the impossible life. This hypothesis of radiocarbon levels have not remained stable throughout the history of the planet, is admitted by many scientists:

Certainly spoil some of our carefully developed methods of dating things of the past [...]. If the level of C-14 was different in the past due to a higher magnetic protection against cosmic rays. (SCIENCE DIGEST, December 1960)

The fact of the world, in the time before the flood have a thick layer of water suspended overhead, makes doubtful the method of C-14 that will date fossils and objects, as well as five thousand years ago. In fact this is indirectly recognized by Science magazine writer of 08/16/1963, on page 634 it reads: "Errors in the radiocarbon dates of shells can be as large as several thousand years."

B - POTASSIUM-ARGON

While the method of C-14 calculates the radioactivity in the remains of living things; potassium-argon measures the age of the rocks. The half-life of radioactive potassium lasts 1.3 billion years or so, and that is when half the potassium decomposes and becomes the argon gas. Experts agree that it is difficult to be exact this method, especially when the question is "few time" as a few million years. Thus, this method is doubtful in lower measurements in a million years.

This method of dating is increasingly inaccurate in dating less than a million years. Therefore, there is a period during the lower and the average Pleistocene where it is difficult and uncertain dating human remains (NATURAL HISTORY MAGAZINE, February 1967, p 58)

However, the problem of potassium-argon method not only with short dates, also their long time forecasts do not show are reliable:

77


Through the radioactive methods of fixing dates (potassium-argon) was reached calculate the Earth's age about 4.5 million years ago, now provided a new figure and higher - 6.5 million years. (SCIENCE DIGEST, December 1962, p 35)

As you can see, we cannot rely on a calculator that besides err in cents numbers, also commits the fancy error omit or add two million. With numbers inaccurate if cannot seriously consider their calculations, and it is therefore that scientists at Johns Hopkins University said:

Dates are of dubious value. (SCIENCE DIGEST, 04.02.1965, p 73)

CONCLUSION

This book aimed to reveal the falsity of the theory of evolution, which although not proven as true, take the air of 'case closed' and proven science. However, it is not so think hundreds of millions of people worldwide, including many scientists who doubt all the arguments that support this theory. Let's see what reported significant personalities in the world on the Theory of Evolution:

Doctor JW Klotz: "the acceptance of evolution is still based on a great deal of faith." (Dr. JW Klotz was head of the scientific department of a college the first world, the statement Lutheran Witness Reporter on 14/11/1965)

Doctor T. N. Thahmisian: "Scientists who are teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con men, and the story they tell is, perhaps, the greatest achievement ever. We do not have not one iota of fact to explain the evolution. "(Dr. Thahmisian was physiologist of the Atomic Energy Commission of USA, statement in Bee de Fresno, 08.20.1959, p 1)

Doctor N Ch Wickramasinghe: "In the current state of knowledge about life and the universe, categorically deny all forms of creation as the explanation of life is a blind outrage of behavior and arrogance unforgivable." (Dr. N. Ch. Wickramasinghe was applied math teacher and astronomy at University College Cardiff, Wales. Statement published in the UNESCO Courier, June 1982, p 38)

Dr. Frank Lewis: "The things repeatedly persuaded to accept the theory, were the sheer weight of authority on the part of scientists, through a method, not always very refined preponderance. The young aspiring too often, if he wanted to stay in the good graces of scientists,

78


most veterans, was obliged to accept the theory of evolution. "(Dr. Lewis was a professor of biology. Declaration made in the book Evolution, creation and science, p 10)

Dr. Oswald Spengler: There are more conclusive refutation of Darwinism than that provided by paleontology [...]. We find perfectly stable and unchanged forms that have been preserved through the ages, shapes that have not developed according to the principle of the most suitable cells, but that arise suddenly in their final form. (Dr. Spengler was expert in all aspects of the theory of evolution, statement in the book, "The Decline of the West, II, New York, Knopf, p 32)

SCHOOL MUST TEACH THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION OR CREATIONIST THEORY?

I will be very democratic in my opinion, after all no one should be forced to believe in God. So you need to move some "old wives tales" to meet atheists; and the theory of evolution should be taught, but only as a remote possibility.

I am deeply convinced creationist and this belief, presenting scientific evidence. Among the hundreds of scientific foundations that point that life can only have arisen from the creative work of God, will touch only the incurable wound of the Theory of Evolution:

BIOGENESIS - Scientific Procedures performed in laboratories by scientist Pasteur show, no errors, that LIFE COME OF LIFE, this is the fundamental maxim of BIOGENETIC SCIENCE.

Life cannot come from inanimate material, a living being can only come through another living being. This THESIS was supported by scholars such as Ernest Haeckel, Carl Gustav Jung, Thomas Henry Hurley, Stanley Miller, Oscar Hertwig, Lázzaro Spallanzani, Francesco Redi.

THE THEORY OF SPONTANEOUS GENERATION that for many years, was the mainstay of the Theory of Evolution, was demystified proven in laboratory work.

William Bradley commented on the progress of the theory of evolution by saying: "The optimism of the 1950s is gone. The climate at the International Conference on the Origin of Life, in 1999, was described as serious and full of pessimism, frustration and despair." (Www.creationwiki.org/fr, accessed 26/09/2010)

79


A careful analysis shows that the atheist scientists are not able to create a rational basis for the origin of life without the CREATOR and probably do not understand the implications of CHEMISTRY which is involved in the issue of LIFE SOURCE.

CONSEQUENCES OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION

They say the woman bishop of Worcester to learn that Darwin divulged that the man was not a descendant of Adam and Eve, but of animals, she would have said: “Let's hope this is not true, but if it is, let us pray that is not reaching the ears of the people.” We disagree with the bishop's wife, because the truth should be above all; we cannot say that black is white, just because the majority thinks so. However, many centuries have passed; and the theory of evolution did not get the truism status. Unlike, many other more recent theories as Albert Einstein's theories, including the theory of relativity is in a comfortable position compared with the theory of evolution, because over time your assumptions were being confirmed.

Let's look at the ideological and social consequences based on the theory of evolution:

A - RACISM

No doubt the theory of evolution has had a great influence on racist ideology; who was prejudiced against Indians, Blacks, Orientals or any other race, now had a "scientific argument" that justified their prejudice. No doubt, were white Europeans who embraced more enthusiastically Darwin's ideas because such ideas eased their consciences of territorial expansion crimes and the subjugation of other peoples.

B - SOCIAL EXPLORATION

The selection of species taught by Darwin preached the survival of the fittest, and so the theory of evolution was the basis for that slavery was lawful. The biological Darwinism spawned the social Darwinism used to justify social and economic privileges of the powerful classes. Biological principles of Darwin were applied by Spencer (1820-1903) in sociology, giving a more serious meaning to the survival of the fittest.

C - MILITARY DOMINATION

80


One of the most harmful effects of the theory of evolution was reflected in the mind of a mental patient before getting the last ten years of his life in a sanatorium, come at 'go crazy' others with their ideas: this man was the philosopher Nietzsche (1844-1900). Author of several books such as: ECCOHOMMO, SAID SO ZARATRUSCA, THE ANTICHRIST, etc. Nietzsche preached that the story was like climbing a mountain: Underneath were a monkey; in the middle of the climb, we were the man; and on top would be the superman.

The theory of evolution applied for Nietzsche in philosophy, inspired Adolf Hitler to believe in a superior race, Hitler, convinced of evolutionary doctrine, and having as coffee table books the writings of Nietzsche, sought by military force demonstrate that the Germans were the SUPER SPECIES and the rest of the story we all know. The ideology of Nietzsche's books influenced the tyrannical career Hitler. Nietzsche, in turn, was influenced by Darwin, is why Darwin is considered the grandfather of the Second World War. The theory of evolution was invented to satisfy the restlessness of man on their origin, but instead created a doctrinal monster; and its effects will be manifested in acts insane those who consider themselves belonging to a human super specie.

D - ABSURD

Accept the theory of evolution is based on genetic mutations is absurd, at least; yet evolutionists continue making use of this argument as a favorable factor in this irrational theory. Just to give you an idea of the impossibility of changes, see Julian Huxley's statement:

The proportion of one per thousand applied to favorable mutations does not look great, but it's probably generous, because so many mutations are mortal, to prevent the body to continue living, and the vast majority of the remaining other mutations, is almost always harmful. A total of one million 'jumps' by mutation (for a change) seem much, but it's probably a low calculation... after all, it is only a step or 'jump' every two thousand years. Take put these figures as reasonable estimates. With this proportion - and without resorting to the selection would need to produce one million 'genes' to get one that contains two advantageous mutations and remain so until thousand millionth will power to get a 'gene' that has a million of favorable mutations" (EVOLUTION. IN ACTION, New York, Harper and Bros., 1953: 41 and 42)

Of course, such a thing is impossible, but it is a practical way to view the fantastic obstacles opposed to getting several favorable mutations in a single gene due to chance. To represent the millionth thousand high power, we would need to write the number one, followed by three million zeros, requiring three volumes of about five hundred

81


pages each just to print them! This figure is so large that it is difficult to imagine it, but it shows the difficulties that natural selection has to overcome.

E - ATHEISM

The disbelief in God phenomenon has no scientific basis, but the theory of evolution that is propagated by the media and in school curricula, is responsible for shaking the faith of millions of people, especially in Europe where this doctrine arose and developed.

Darwin proved nothing about evolution, but with the help of the Devil, his doctrine was more widely publicized. The Theory of Evolution is the most subtle way to eliminate God from people's hearts, convincing them that the universe, life and man did not need God to exist and maintain. Julian Huxley said:

Darwin pointed out that it is not needed any supernatural architect , since natural selection could explain to any known form of life; there was no place for a supernatural agency in its evolution. (AT RANDOM, p 46)

I end this book recommending to all who cling to the truth. Who loves the truth, read the Bible with the heart and studying the sciences with reason. I remain always open to learn, discover and accept the truth, but I must not deny the biblical principles and replace them with concepts that are but vain philosophy. I have no commitment to any church or religious entity, except with my conscience. I do not believe in the theory of evolution because some spiritual guardian compels me to refute it, however, I reject it because it does not convince me by reason.

QUESTIONNAIRE, REFLECTION AND MEMORY

82


The questions below should be answered separately for each reader or student, to help you to reflect the content of the book and to memorize the main topics discussed in the theory of evolution study.

1 - What are some recurring vocabularies by evolutionists.

2 - What do you understand about comparative anatomy.

3 - Describe the human mental capacity that differs abysmal other creatures.

4 - How to Antropoart works for the Theory of Evolution?

5 - Demonstrate by cytology as each creature reproduce within their own species.

6 - Through physiology, reason why the vital organs attest to the creationism and not of evolution.

7 - God created a program for life in each species, DNA, do weighting relating the function of DNA and the creationist argument.

8 - Enumerate characteristics of living things that prevent from inanimate matter have generated life as reverie the Theory of Evolution.

9 - Why hybridity is a favorable reasoning to creationist concept?

10 - What are the real consequences of genetic mutations? They favor the evolution of species?

11 - How biodiversity testifies in favor of creationist hypothesis?

12 - How evolutionists fantasize the evolutionary hypothesis based on bipedalism?

13 - Discourse on the effect of time in living matter and inanimate and because we deduce that the time does not favor the evolution of species.

14 - Defend the thesis that adaptation is different from the evolution of species, and what we see in nature are only examples of adaptation.

15 - How cyanobacteria testify to the creationism?

16 - Why the Cambrian Period is the time of God's creation on planet Earth?

83


17 - List and make short definitions of such "missing links".

18 - Comment on two possible planetary cataclysms.

19 - Reflect on regression of human nature that contradicts the theory of evolution, including explaining why humans are the only beings who need clothing.

20 - Explain why the dating methods are questionable when covering thousands of years.

REFERENCES

THE BIOLOGICAL BASIS OF HUMAN FREEDOM, p 102

LIFE, June 28, 1963

MAN DID GET HERE BY EVOLUTION or by creation ?, p 77 in the English version

'SEE' (weekly), author: Aroldo Campos, 10.02.1988, page 48

ILLUSTRATED SCIENCE, October 1982, page 49

MAN, GOS AND MAGIC - New York, 1961, page 304

SCIENCE DIGEST, April 1981, page 41

CULTURAL EVOLUTION OF MAN, Rio de Janeiro, Zahar, p 32

THE NATURE OF LIFE, 1962, page 67

SCIENCE TODAY, page 25, 26

THE BRAIN: THE LAST FRONTIER, p 59, 69

SCIENCE NEWS LETTER, 09/03/1955

84


THE ENCHANTED LOOM: MIN IN TE UNIVERSE, New York, 1981, p 18

WIKIPEDIA, accessed 31/12/2014

READER DIGEST, October and 1962: 144 and 148

Scientific American, October 1963

LIFE, 04/30/1965

UNIMES, Degree in Biology from the Metropolitan University of Santos, 2012

A HUGE DAY, p 164

GENETICS AND EVOLUTION, Cered, p 72

GENETIC AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, p 5:06

FOT TODAY BIOLOGY, p 294

THE MATERIAL BASIS OF EVOLUTION, p 168

COLLECTION PURPOSE, Cered, Book 2, page 51

THE NEW ZEALAND HERALD, 01/17/65

RADIATION, GENES AND MAN, 1959, p 35

THE MECHANISM OF EVOLUTION, p 30

TIMES, 11/11/1946, p 96

GENETIC AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, p 73

THE CRIACIONIST

WORD BOOK ENCYCLOPEDIA, p 809 vol XIII, p 194 vol IX

JOURNAL SUPERINTERESSANTE, September 1988, p 46

UNIVERSAL INSTITUTE Brazilian, 18th lesson Biology

CHARLES DARWIN, p 163

Compendium RETROSPECTIVE OF BIOLOGY 1996: 304 and 305

ENCYCLOPEDIA UK, volume 22, p 988)

85


TIMES, 12/02/1965

I.U.B, lesson 18, page 4

FACTS AND FAITH "1965, p 142

THE STORY OF LIFE, 1958, p 237 and 242

FACTS AND FAITH, p 139

CHARLES DARWIN, p 182

REVIEW TEXT IN BIOLOGY, p 363

THE MEANING OF EVOLUTION, Yale University Press, p 11

GENETIC AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, p 96

SUPERINTERESSANTE 09/88, page 50

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 10/62, p 51

UNIMES, Santos, 2012

THE ORIGINS OF SPECIES, 327-329

Scientific American, 1964

CAME MAN TO EXIST FOR DEVELOPMENT OR THE CREATION ?, Watchtower Society, p 44

New York Times, 25/10/1964

NATURAL HISTORY, October 1959, p 467

SUPERINTERESSANTE, September 1988

SCIENCE, 12.10.1965

SCIENCE DIGEST, December 1960

NATURAL HISTORY MAGAZINE, February 1967, p 58

SCIENCE DIGEST, December 1962, p 35

SCIENCE DIGEST, 02.04.1965, p 73

Lutheran Witness Reporter on 14/11/1965

Bee Fresno 20.08.1959, p 1

86


UNESCO Courier in June 1982, p 38

Evolution, creation and science, p 10

The Decline of the West, II, New York, Knopf, p 32

EVOLUTION IN ACTION, New York, Harper and Bros., 1953: 41 and 42

AT RANDOM, p 46

http://www.alunosonline.com.br, access, 26/09/2010

www.creationwiki.org/fr, access AT 26/09/2010

http://pessoal.educacional.com.br, access 26/09/2010

http://www.brasilescola.com/biologia/algas.htm, access 31/12/2014

http://iadrn.blogspot.com.br/2012/01/o-flagelo-bacteriano-nanomaquina.html, access 31/12/2014

87

biology - the myth of evolution

Science

book biology

purpose of biology

myth ofevolution

scribe valdemirmota

m543 menezes

theory of evolution

steps of evolution

process of evolution