big data and analytics for national security 20120711
TRANSCRIPT
Ques%ons for the Talk
• What big data challenges are being faced in the na%onal security environment?
• How are federal government agencies using big data approaches for na%onal security challenges?
• What is unique/different about big data in the na%onal security seAng?
• What solu%ons are currently being sought by the government to address na%onal security challenges with big data?
US Na%onal Security Strategy • Our Interests
– Security – Prosperity – Values – Interna%onal Order
• Our Approach – Defense – Diplomacy – Economic – Development – Homeland Security – Intelligence – Communica%ons – People
Major Na%onal Security Missions
• Conven%onal Military Defense • Counter Nuclear Prolifera%on • Counter Chemical/Biological WMD • Counter Terrorism • Cybersecurity • Counter Intelligence • Counter Narco%cs
(Some)Na%onal Security Organiza%ons
Homeland Security Intelligence
Defense
Department of Defense
NORTHCOM
Department of Homeland Security
Defense Intelligence Agency
Director of Na%onal
Intelligence
Federal Bureau of Inves%ga%on
Defense Posi%ons and Tasks
Intelligence (J-‐2) Planning (J-‐5) Opera5ons (J-‐3)
• Requirements • Planning • Collec%on • Processing • Exploita%on • Dissemina%on • Archiving and retrieval
• Mission Analysis • Course of Ac%on (COA)
Development • COA Analysis and
Wargaming • COA Comparison • COA Approval • Plan Development
• Shape • Deter • Seize Ini%a%ve • Dominate • Stabilize • Enable Civil Authority
Intelligence Cycle • The process of developing unrefined data into polished intelligence for the
use of policymakers. The intelligence cycle consists of six steps, described below.
Intelligence Disciplines
SIGINT Signals intelligence
IMINT Image Intelligence
MASINT Measurement and
Signature Intelligence
OSINT Open Source Intelligence
HUMINT Human Intelligence
GEOINT Geospa%al Intelligence
Source: h`p://www.dni.gov
Aerial Reconnaissance: WWII
Collec%on Processing
and Exploita%on
Analysis and Produc%on Dissemina%on
Aerial Reconnaissance: ~2012
Collec%on Processing
and Exploita%on
Analysis and Produc%on Dissemina%on
The full mo%on video from each of the imaging sensors can be viewed as separate video streams or fused together.
• infrared sensor • color/monochrome
daylight TV camera, • image-‐intensified
TV camera, • laser designator • laser illuminator
Aerial reconnaissance teams are in direct communica%on with supported units
Aerial Reconnaissance: ~2015
Collec%on Processing
and Exploita%on
Analysis and Produc%on Dissemina%on
Na%onal Security Big Data Challenges
• Mari%me Security • Cyber Security • Money Laundering • Mul%-‐INT Analysis • Space Situa%onal Awareness
CIA CTO Perspec%ve on Big Data
Source: h`p://www.slideshare.net/brianahier/perspec%ves-‐on-‐big-‐data-‐mission-‐and-‐needs-‐gus-‐hunt-‐cia-‐cto
US Government Big Data Strategy
• White House has acknowledged the importance of Big Data for mul%ple disciplines
Big Data Ini5a5ve for Research and Development
• Ini%a%ve Goals – Advance state-‐of-‐the-‐art core technologies needed to collect, store, preserve, manage, analyze, and share huge quan%%es of data.
– Harness these technologies to accelerate the pace of discovery in science and engineering, strengthen our na%onal security, and transform teaching and learning; and
– Expand the workforce needed to develop and use Big Data technologies.
• Data to Decisions Ini5a5ve – Challenge – The prolifera%on of sensors and large data sets are overwhelming analysts, as they lack the tools to efficiently process, store, analyze, and retrieve vast amounts of data.
– Goal -‐ Develop an open-‐source architecture system that enables rapid integra%on of exis%ng and future data exploita%on tools to achieve a new paradigm in the management and analysis of data.
Source: h`p://www.acq.osd.mil/chiehechnologist/areas/dtd.html
Challenges for Na%onal Security Big Data
• Government Budget Process • Government Acquisi%on Process • Siloed and Proprietary Systems • Data Balkaniza%on and Compartmentaliza%on
• Government Privacy Obliga%ons and Data Mining Restric%ons
• Personnel System Lag • Austere Deployment Environments
Government Budget Process
FY2012
Agency develops investment plans
Agency sends budget request to OMB
OMB revises budget with agency
President submits budget to Congress
Congress debates budget and passes appropria%ons bills
President signs budget
Agencies have funds available to spend
FY2013 FY2014
Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul
Federal Government agencies have to commit to specific spending programs roughly 18 months before they begin spending
4
A
Integrated System Design
System Capability & Manufacturing Process Demonstration Low-Rate Initial Production
DefenseAcquisition
System(event-driven)
Planning,Programming,
Budgeting& Execution
Process
MilitaryDepartments andDefense Agencies
FinancialManagement
Integrated Defense Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Life Cycle Management System
Full-Rate Production/Deployment
Engineering & Manufacturing Development Phase Operations & Support Phase
DoD DecisionSupport SystemsEffective Interaction
is Essential
Life Cycle Sustainment
Decisions
Actual CostsEngineering
Cost EstimationMethods
ParametricAnalogy
Technology Development PhaseMateriel Solution Analysis Phase
WhiteHouse
Office of theSecretary of Defense
and Joint Staff
PMO Budget Estimate
PMO POM Input
Oversight&
Review
ExitCriteria
ExitCriteria
ADMExit
CriteriaMet Exit
Criteria
ADMExit
Criteria
ADM
MBI Apportionment
Contracting
Production & Deployment Phase
B C
Purpose of LRIP: •Complete manufacturing development•Establish initial production base•Ramp to production rate•Produce systems for IOT&E
Low-Rate Initial Production
Systems
FCA
Prototypes
Version 5.4 15 June 2010
StudyContracts
Complete Analysis of Alternatives to assess potential materiel solutions to capability need, identify key technologies and estimate life cycle costs.
Consider commercial-off-the-shelf and solutions from both large andsmall business. Identify materiel solution to capability need.
Complete Technology Development Strategy.
Reduce technology risk, determine and mature appropriate set of technologies to integrate into full system, demonstrate critical technology elements on prototypes, and complete preliminary design. Identify an
affordable program or increment of militarily useful capability, demonstrate technology in relevant environment, and identify and assess manufacturing risks. Provide for two or more competing teams
producing prototypes of system and/or key system elements prior to or through Milestone B.
Develop a system or increment of capability; complete full system integration, develop affordable and executable manufacturing process; ensure operational supportability; reduce logistics footprint; implement human systems integration; design for producibility; ensure
affordability; protect critical program information; and demonstrate system integration, interoperability, safety, and utility.
Achieve operational capability that satisfies mission needs. Low-rate initial production (limited deployment for software intensive systems with no development hardware) and full-rate production (full deployment for software intensive systems). Deliver
fully funded quantity of systems and supporting material and services for program or increment to users.
Execute support program that meets materiel readiness and operational support performance requirements and
sustains system in most cost-effective manner. Overlaps Production and Deployment Phase.
July
August - November November December
January February (1st Monday)
Disposal
SystemPerformance
Spec
ProductionRepresentative
Articles
CARD – Cost Analysis Requirements DescriptionCCE – Component Cost EstimateCCP – Component Cost PositionICE – Independent Cost EstimateMDAP – Major Defense Acquisition ProgramMAIS – Major Automated Information SystemPMO – Program Management OfficeRDT&E – Research, Development, Test & Evaluation
Cost Acronyms
FYDP – Future Years Defense ProgramMBI – Major Budget IssuesOMB – Office of Management and Budget
PMO – Program Management OfficePOM – Program Objectives Memorandum
Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution Acronyms
Joint Capabilities Integration & Development
System(need-driven)
AoAupdated as necessary
Full-RateProduction
Systems
MajorProducts
Operations andMaintenance
Types ofFunds RDT&E – Management & Support RDT&E – Management & SupportRDT&E – Management & Support
RDT&E – Advanced Component Development and Prototypes RDT&E – Systems Development & Demonstration
FinalProductBaseline
RDT&E – Advanced Technology Development
FOT&E
TechnicalSystems EngineeringTest and EvaluationSupportability
Analyze/Assess Concepts Versus
Defined User Needs &Environmental Constraints
Decompose Concept Functional Definition into Component Concepts &Assessment Objectives
Develop Component Concepts, i.e., Enabling/Critical
Technologies, Constraints, & Cost/Risk Drivers
Design/Develop System Concepts,i.e., Enabling/Critical Technologies,
Update Constraints, & Cost/Risk Drivers
•ICD•AoA Study Plan•Exit Criteria•Alternative Maintenance & Sustainment Concepts
OUTPUTS
Trades Trades
Implement andField
• Process Change - Operations/Maintenance Support
• Materiel Change- Hardware/Product Support Package
INPUTS•Service Use Data•User Feedback •Failure Reports•Discrepancy Reports•SEP•System Safety Analysis•Product Support Element
Requirements
OUTPUTSIntegrated DT&E/OT&E/LFT&E
Demonstrate System toSpecified User Needs andEnvironmental Constraints
•ICD & Draft CDD•Approved Materiel Solution•Exit Criteria •Support & Maintenance Concepts& Technologies•Systems Engineering Plan•AoA Report •T&E Strategy•Technology Development Strategy•System Safety Analysis
Analyze DeficienciesTo Determine Corrective
Actions
OUTPUTS
Modify Configuration(Hardware/Software/Specs)
To Correct Deficiencies
LeastAcceptable
MostAcceptable
Recycle/Reuse
Reprocessing
DisposalLandfill
Disposal
Logistics/Sustainment
•Test Results •Exit Criteria•APB •CPD •SEP •TEMP•Product Support Element
Requirements•PESHE•System Safety Analysis
INPUTS
Evaluate ProductSupport Capabilities
Performance-Based Agreements
Product Support Integrator/Product Support Provider
LFTEReport to Congress
BLRIPReport to Congress
Post-CDR AFRPDRB
Demonstrate Product Support Capability•Footprint Reduction •Supply Chain Management•Product Support Elements•Finalize Product Support BCA
Verify and ValidateProduction
Configuration
•Preliminary System Spec•Systems Engineering Plan•T&E Strategy•System Safety Analysis•Support & Maintenance Concepts& Technologies
•Inputs to:-draft CDD -AoA -TDS -IBR-Cost/Manpower Est.-Product Support Strategy
ASR
•System Allocated Baseline•PDR Report •Test Reports•SEP •TEMP •PESHE •PPP •TRA•NEPA Compliance Schedule•Risk Assessment •LCSP•Validated Systems Support & MaintObjectives & Requirements•System Safety Analysis•Inputs to: -CDD -ISP -STA -IBR
-Acq Strategy-Affordability Assessment-Cost/Manpower Est.
SVR PRR
•Initial Product Baseline•Test Reports•SEP •TRA •PESHE •TEMP•NEPA Compliance Schedule•Elements of Product Support •Risk Assessment•Life Cycle Sustainment Plan•System Safety Analysis•Inputs to: -CPD -STA -ISP
-IBR -Cost/Manpower Est.
•Data for In-Service Review•Input to CDD for next increment•Modifications/upgrades to fielded
systems•SEP •Test Reports•System Safety Analysis•Product Support Package
•Product Baseline•Test Reports•SEP •PESHE •TEMP •System Safety Analysis •Inputs to: -IBR
- Cost/Manpower Est.- Product Support Package
JITC Joint Interoperability Test Certification
PCA
Develop Initial Product Support StrategyInitiate Product Support BCA
(Define Ground Rules & Assumptions)
Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) Strategy (Preferred Product Support Approach)
Refine Supportability
Objectives/Constraints
Pre-IOC and Post IOC Supportability Assessments
Post-DeploymentReview
In-ServiceReview
Fabricate, Assemble,Code to “Build-to”
Documentation
TLCSMTLCSM TLCSMTotal Life
Cycle SystemsManagement
For a single copy of this chart, send a request to [email protected] Send recommendations to improve the content of this chart to [email protected]
INPUTSINPUTSINPUTS OUTPUTS OUTPUTS
(annual-calendar-driven)
Congressional Budget Process
AppropriationCommittees
AuthorizationCommittees
Authorization/AppropriationActs Passed
Joint Operations ConceptsConcept of Operations
Operations Plans
Strategic Guidance
Initiate Evolutionary Acquisition Strategy Evolutionary Acquisition Strategy
MDA
DoD Testimony DoD Appeals
C
DAB/ITAB MDA
ExitCriteria
ADM
OMB
Joint Operations ConceptsConcept of Operations
Technology Development StrategyAoA Report
DoD Enterprise Architecture &Solution Architecture
Technical Standards Profile
Threshold/objective tradeoffs –Revised Performance Attributes
Appropriated Funds To Support Contracts
Business CaseAnalysis
Component/JROCValidation &
ApprovalKPPs
CDDDraftCDD
KPPs
CPD
ExitCriteria
MS BCert
Cost-TypeContract
Determination(if applicable)
ADM
FRP
B C
FRP
ExitCriteria
MetAPBPSR
Monitor & CollectService Use & Supply
Chain Performance Data
Analyze Data to:Validate Failures &
Determine Root Causes
DetermineSystem Risk/
Hazard Severity
DevelopCorrective
Action
Integrate and TestCorrective Action
Assess Risk of Improved System
Interpret User Needs,Analyze Operational
Capabilities &Environmental Constraints
VerificationLinkage
ValidationLinkage
VerificationLinkage
VerificationLinkage
VerificationLinkage
ValidationLinkage
VerificationLinkage
VerificationLinkage
VerificationLinkage
Verification/ValidationLinkage
VerificationLinkage
VerificationLinkage
ITR
Verification/ValidationLinkage
MS ACert
ADM
AoA
Fiscal Guidance
InitialProductBaseline
(verified)
Non-materiel solutions
JROC/Component
Validation andApproval
DCR
AoA Study Guidance
AoA Study Plan
Define Supportability
Objectives
ExitCriteria
MetAPB
MTA
FMECAFTA
LORA
RCM
MSB
Threshold/objective tradeoffs –Revised Performance Attributes
MSC
MSA
Joint Capabilities Integration& Development System
VCJCS OversightCJCSI 3170.01 series
DefenseAcquisition
SystemUSD(AT&L) Oversight
DoDD 5000.01
Planning,Programming,
Budgeting & ExecutionProcess
DEPSECDEF OversightDoD 7000.14-R
Threshold/objective tradeoffs –Revised Performance Attributes
Prototypes
Product Support Plan•Statutory/Regulatory•Source of Support•Legacy Considerations•Conduct Product Support BCA
-Supply Support -Training-Maintenance -Support Data
-Manpower & personnel
•Product Support ElementsSet Product Support
Strategy
Technical & Logistics AcronymsASR – Alternative Systems ReviewAOTR – Assessment of Operational Test ReadinessBCA – Business Case AnalysisBLRIP – Beyond Low Rate Initial ProductionCDR – Critical Design ReviewCI – Configuration ItemDT&E – Developmental Test & EvaluationEOA – Early Operational AssessmentESOH – Environment, Safety & Occupational HealthFCA – Functional Configuration AuditFMECA – Failure Mode Effects & Criticality AnalysisFOT&E – Follow-On Test & EvaluationFTA – Failure Tree AnalysisIOT&E – Initial Operational Test & EvaluationISR – In-Service ReviewISP – Information Support PlanITR – Initial Technical ReviewJITC – Joint Interoperability Test CommandLFT&E – Live Fire Test & EvaluationLORA – Level of Repair AnalysisMTA – Maintenance Task AnalysisNEPA – National Environmental Policy Act
OA – Operational AssessmentOTRR – Operational Test Readiness ReviewPBA – Performance-Based AgreementPESHE – Programmatic Environment,
Safety & Occupational Health EvaluationPDR – Preliminary Design ReviewPCA – Physical Configuration AuditPRR – Production Readiness ReviewPPP – Program Protection PlanPSI – Product Support IntegratorPSP – Product Support ProviderRCM – Reliability Centered MaintenanceRMS – Reliability, Maintainability & SupportabilitySEP – Systems Engineering PlanSFR – System Functional ReviewSRR – System Requirements ReviewSTA – System Threat AssessmentSVR – System Verification ReviewTEMP – Test & Evaluation Master PlanTDS – Technology Development StrategyTRA – Technology Readiness AssessmentTRR – Test Readiness Review
LFT&EWaiver
(if appropriate)
Final RFP cannot be released until TDS is approved
(with alternate LFT&E Plan)
Post-CDR Report
A
P-CDRA Increment 3
Increment 2P-CDRA
Procurement
Capabilities-BasedAssessment
Final RFP cannot be released until Acq Strategy is approved
Final RFP cannot be released until Acq Strategy is approved
Final RFP cannot be released until Acq Strategy is approved
AoAupdated asnecessary AoAMAIS
only
Following the Materiel Development Decision, the Milestone Decision Authority may authorize entry into the acquisition process at any point, consistent with phase-specific entrance criteria and statutory requirements
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System - AcronymsCDD – Capability Development DocumentCPD – Capability Production DocumentDCR – DOTMLPF Change RecommendationDOTMLPF – Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel,
Leadership and Education, Personnel, & FacilitiesFOC – Full Operational CapabilityICD – Initial Capabilities Document
IOC – Initial Operational CapabilityIT – Information TechnologyJP 3-0 – Joint Publication 3-0, “Joint Operations”JROC – Joint Requirements Oversight CouncilMUA – Military Utility AssessmentKPP – Key Performance ParameterKSA – Key System Attribute
Decompose FunctionalDefinitions into CriticalComponent Definition &
Technologies Verification PlanCDR
•Sys Performance Spec•Acquisition Strategy•Exit Criteria•APB •CDD •STA •ISP •SEP •TEMP •PESHE •PPP •NEPA Compliance Schedule•Risk Assessment•Validated Sys Support & MaintObjectives & Requirements
•Product Support Strategy•System Safety Analysis
Validated and approved CDD & CPD for each increment of
evolutionary acquisition
AMDD
ADM – Acquisition Decision MemorandumAoA – Analysis of AlternativesAPB – Acquisition Program BaselineCDR – Critical Design ReviewCBRN – Chemical, Biological, Radiological & NuclearDAB – Defense Acquisition BoardECP – Engineering Change ProposalESOH – Environment, Safety, and Occupational HealthEVM – Earned Value ManagementFRPDR – Full Rate Production Decision ReviewFDDR – Full Deployment Decision ReviewIBR – Integrated Baseline ReviewITAB – Information Technology Acquisition BoardLRIP – Low Rate Initial Production
MAIS – Major Automated Information SystemMDA – Milestone Decision AuthorityMDD – Materiel Development DecisionNSS – National Security SystemsPDR – Preliminary Design ReviewP-CDRA – Post Critical Design Review AssessmentP-PDRA – Post PDR AssessmentPSR – Program Support ReviewRAM-C – Reliability, Availability, Maintainability & Cost
Rationale ReportRFP – Request for ProposalsRFI – Request for InformationTRA – Technology Readiness AssessmentTLCSM – Total Life Cycle Systems Management
Oversight & Review and Contracting Acronyms
Selectively AppliedSystemTraining
KPP
EnergyEfficiency
KPPJoint Staff Review
J-1 – Joint manpower. J-2 – Intelligence/threat. J-3 – Operational suitability, sufficiency, &
supportability. J-4 – Facilities, sustainment, & energy efficiency. J-5 – Alignment with strategy & priorities.
J-6 – IT/NSS interoperability & supportability.J-7 – Systems training. J-8 – Weapons safety.
System Threat AssessmentForce
ProtectionKPP
SurvivabilityKPP
Selectively AppliedSystemTraining
KPP
EnergyEfficiency
KPPJoint Staff Review
J-1 – Joint manpower. J-2 – Intelligence/threat. J-3 – Operational suitability, sufficiency, &
supportability. J-4 – Facilities, sustainment, & energy efficiency. J-5 – Alignment with strategy & priorities.
J-6 – IT/NSS interoperability & supportability.J-7 – Systems training. J-8 – Weapons safety.
Joint Staff ReviewJ-1 – Joint manpower. J-2 – Intelligence/threat.
J-3 – Operational suitability, sufficiency, & supportability. J-4 – Facilities, sustainment, & energy efficiency. J-5 – Alignment with strategy & priorities.
J-6 – IT/NSS interoperability & supportability.J-7 – Systems training. J-8 – Weapons safety.
KPPsTraceable To ICD &
JP 3-0
System Threat AssessmentForce
ProtectionKPP
SurvivabilityKPP
System Threat AssessmentForce
ProtectionKPP
SurvivabilityKPP
Selectively AppliedSystemTraining
KPP
EnergyEfficiency
KPP
ADMPost-
PDR A
Required if PDR is after Milestone B
ExitCriteria
MetPSR
Demo & Validate System& Tech Maturity Versus Defined User Needs &
Environmental Constraints
(If program initiation, or if equiv to FDDR)
Clinger-Cohen Act (IT incl NSS)- Compliance- CIO Confirmation of Compliance
Post-CDR ADecision Points/Milestones MDD FRP
DR IOC FOC
SRR
This chart is a classroom aid for Defense Acquisition University students. It provides a notional illustration of interfaces among three major decision support systems used to develop, produce and field a weapon system for national defense. Defense acquisition is a complex process with many more activities than shown here and many concurrent activities that cannot be displayed on a two-dimensional chart. Supporting information is on back of this chart. For more information, see the Defense Acquisition Portal (http://dap.dau.mil).
PSRTRA Exit
CriteriaMet
APBPSR
TRA
PDR Report
Clinger-Cohen Act (IT incl NSS)- Compliance- CIO Confirmation of Compliance
Clinger-Cohen Act (IT incl NSS)- Compliance- CIO Confirmation of Compliance
Clinger-Cohen Act (IT incl NSS)- Compliance- CIO Confirmation of Compliance
Component/JROCValidation &
Approval
Component/JROCValidation &
Approval
FDDRFor software intensive systems
DAB/ITAB MDA DAB/
ITAB MDA DAB/ITAB MDA DAB/
ITAB MDA
Compliant Solution
Architectures
SupportabilityRequirements
InformationAssurance
Net Centric Data & Services
Strategy
TechnicalStandards & interfacesNet-Ready
KPP
Compliant Solution
Architectures
SupportabilityRequirements
InformationAssurance
Net Centric Data & Services
Strategy
TechnicalStandards & interfacesNet-Ready
KPP
Compliant Solution
Architectures
SupportabilityRequirements
InformationAssurance
Net Centric Data & Services
Strategy
TechnicalStandards & interfacesNet-Ready
KPP
AlternativeMateriel
Solutions
InitialProductBaseline
InformationSupport
Plan
MUA/Final Demo Report for
Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations & other
prototype projects
InformationSupport
Plan
MUA/Final Demo Report for
Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations & other
prototype projects
InformationSupport
Plan
MUA/Final Demo Report for
Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations & other
prototype projects
KPPsTraceable To ICD &
JP 3-0
KPPsTraceable To ICD &
JP 3-0
Materiel Availability &Operational Availability
ReliabilityKSA
OwnershipCostKSA
AvailabilityKPP
Materiel Availability &Operational Availability
ReliabilityKSA
OwnershipCostKSA
AvailabilityKPP
Materiel Availability &Operational Availability
ReliabilityKSA
OwnershipCostKSA
AvailabilityKPP
ICD
Joint Operations ConceptsConcept of Operations
System Threat AssessmentAoA (if updated)
DoD Enterprise Architecture &Solution Architecture
Information Support PlanTechnical Standards Profile
Joint Operations ConceptsConcept of Operations
System Threat AssessmentAoA (if updated)
DoD Enterprise Architecture &Solution Architecture
Information Support PlanTechnical Standards Profile
CCE CCPMDAP
CARDMDAP/MAIS
ICEMDAP
CCEMDAP
CCP AffordabilityAssessment CARD
MDAP/MAIS
ICEMDAP
CCE CCPCARDMDAP/MAIS
CARDMDAP/MAIS
ICEMDAP
CCE CCP AffordabilityAssessment
Economic Analysis (MAIS)Manpower Estimate (MDAP) Manpower Estimate (MDAP)
Lighter blocks reflect technical efforts required if PDR is
required after Milestone B.
TD PhaseFully Funded
Full FundingIn FYDP Full Funding
In FYDPFull FundingIn FYDP
Acquisition Strategy• Acquisition Approach• Source & Related Documents• Capability Needs• Top-Level Integrated Schedule• Program Interdependency &
Interoperability Summary• International Cooperation• Risk & Risk Management• Technology Maturation• Industrial Capability &
Manufacturing Readiness• Business Strategy
• Resource Management• Program Security Considerations• Test & Evaluation• Data Management • Life-Cycle Sustainment Planning• Life-Cycle Signature Support Plan• CBRN Survivability• Human Systems Integration• ESOH• Military Equipment Valuation &
Accountability• Corrosion Prevention & Control
March
Fiscal GuidanceApril
POM/Budget Formulation
SECDEF Option
Assess/AnalyzeConcept & Verify System Concept’s
Performance
Develop Concept Performance (& Constraints)
Definition & VerificationObjectives
Decompose ConceptPerformance into
Functional Definition &Verification Objectives
Assess/AnalyzeSystem Concept
Versus FunctionalCapabilities
Assess/AnalyzeEnabling/Critical
Components VersusCapabilities
Interpret User Needs.Analyze Operational
Capabilities & Environmental Constraints
Develop System Performance(& Constraints) Spec &
Enabling/Critical Tech &Prototypes Verification Plan
Demo System & PrototypeFunctionalityVersus Plan
Develop FunctionalDefinitions for Enabling/
Critical Tech/Prototypes &Associated Verification Plan
Demo Enabling/Critical Technology Components
Versus Plan
Demo/ModelIntegrated System Versus
Performance Spec
Interpret User Needs, Refine System
Performance Specs &Environmental Constraints
Interpret User Needs, Refine System
Performance Specs &Environmental Constraints
Evolve FunctionalPerformance Specs into
System Allocated Baseline
PDR
Develop System Functional Specs & Verification Plan toEvolve System Functional
Baseline
Evolve FunctionalPerformance Specs into
System Allocated Baseline
SFR
PDR
System DT&E, OT&E, LFT&E& OAs Verify System
Functionality & ConstraintsCompliance to Specs
Integrated DT&E, LFT&E & EOAs Verify Performance
Compliance to Specs
Individual CIVerification
DT&E
TRR
SFR
Develop System Functional Specs & Verification Plan toEvolve System Functional
Baseline
Contract Management ECPs/ChangesContractCloseout
Acq Plan
Draft RFP
RFP &Proposals
Source Selection
Plan
SourceSelection
Draft RFP
RFP &Proposals
Source Selection
Plan
SourceSelection
• Acquisition Approach• Source & Related Documents• Capability Needs• Top-Level Integrated Schedule• Program Interdependency &
Interoperability Summary• International Cooperation• Risk & Risk Management• Technology Maturation &
Competitive Prototyping• Industrial Capability &
Manufacturing Capabilities
• Business Strategy• Resource Management• Program Security
Considerations• Test Planning• Data Management &
Technical Data Rights• Life-Cycle Sustainment
Planning• Life-Cycle Signature
Support Plan• CBRN Survivability
Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Acquisition Strategy• Acquisition Approach• Source & Related Documents• Capability Needs• Top-Level Integrated Schedule• Program Interdependency &
Interoperability Summary• International Cooperation• Risk & Risk Management• Technology Maturation• Industrial Capability &
Manufacturing Readiness• Business Strategy
• Resource Management• Program Security Considerations• Test & Evaluation• Data Management • Life-Cycle Sustainment Planning• Life-Cycle Signature Support Plan• CBRN Survivability• Human Systems Integration• ESOH• Military Equipment Valuation &
Accountability• Corrosion Prevention & Control
Acquisition Strategy• Acquisition Approach• Source & Related Documents• Capability Needs• Top-Level Integrated Schedule• Program Interdependency &
Interoperability Summary• International Cooperation• Risk & Risk Management• Technology Maturation• Industrial Capability &
Manufacturing Readiness• Business Strategy
• Resource Management• Program Security
Considerations• Test & Evaluation• Data Management • Life-Cycle Sustainment Planning• Life-Cycle Signature Support
Plan• CBRN Survivability• Human Systems Integration• ESOH• Corrosion Prevention & Control
EVMSurveillance
TechnologyDevelopment
ContractIBR
Draft RFP
RFP &Proposals
Source Selection
Plan
SourceSelection
MaterielSolution
PDR Report
POM/Budget Submit
Draft RFPAcq Plan
RFP &Proposals
Source Selection
Plan
SourceSelection
ContractManagement ECPs/ChangesContractCloseout
EVMSurveillance
Engineering & Manufacturing
Development ContractIBR
Acq Plan
Acq Plan
ContractManagement ECPs/ChangesContractCloseout
EVMSurveillance
LRIPContract
IBR
ContractManagement ECPs/ChangesContractCloseout
EVMSurveillance
ProductionContract
IBR
Production Qualification Testing
Joint Interoperability Certification Testing
Full-Up System Level LFT&E
IOT&E
AOTR OTRR
Post-Production Software Support Contracts
ICEMDAP MDAP
Economic Analysis (MAIS)Manpower Estimate (MDAP)
MSA PhaseFully Funded
as required
MDAP
Economic Analysis (MAIS)
Evolve CI FunctionalSpecs into Product
(Build to) Documentation& Verification Plan
Initial RAM-CReport
Sustainment Contracts
Product Support Package/PBL Implementation•Product Support Elements •Support and Cost Baseline•Contract for Sustainment (organic & Commercial)
•Supply Chain Management•Revalidate BCA•Refine Life Cycle Sustainment Plan
•Continuous Tech Refreshment•Obsolescence Management•Configuration Control•Data Management•Monitor Performance & Adjust Product Support
Product Support/PBL Management•Public-Private Partnering•Supply Chain Management•PBA Modifications•Assessment of PSI/PSPs•Revalidate PBA/BCA
Operations and Sustainment•Peacetime•Training•Revalidate BCA
•Joint Operations •Crises•Refine LCSP
DoD BudgetIntegrated Program/Budget Review
President’s Budget toCongress
Allocation
FYDPupdated
FYDPupdated
February – September
BudgetCommittees
Defense Planning & Programming Guidance
Issue Nominations/Disposition
National Strategy Documents (updated as necessary)
National Security Strategy
National Defense Strategy
National Military Strategy
Government Acquisi%on Process
Siloed and Proprietary Systems
• Government IT systems have historically been procured, developed, accredited and maintained as stand alone systems
Video LIDAR Image Biometric Text Audio
Government Privacy Obliga%ons and Data Mining Restric%ons
• US Cons%tu%on Protec%ons • Privacy Act of 1974 • Privacy Impact Assessments • US Persons Protec%ons