beyond peer review
DESCRIPTION
PLOS. Beyond Peer Review. Kristen Ratan ALA Annual Meeting 28 June 2014. jakebeal.blogspot.com 320 × 255 Search by image. http:// jasonpriem.org /2010/10/ medline -literature-growth-chart/. Yes. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Beyond Peer Review
Kristen RatanALA Annual Meeting
28 June 2014
PLOS
2
jakebeal.blogspot.com320 × 255Search by image
3
http://jasonpriem.org/2010/10/medline-literature-growth-chart/
4
http://editorsupdate.elsevier.com/poll-results/pressure-grants-publish-driving-rise-unethical-practices-authors/
Yes
5
“the inflated value given to publishing in a small number of so-called “high impact” journals has put pressure on authors to rush into print, cut corners, exaggerate their findings, and overstate the significance of their work.”
6
7
PLOS ALM
12,288 comments over 124,897 articles
8
~2500 reviews/week in PLOS ONE
9
Editor Reviewers
Authors
Pre-publication
10
Continuous Evaluation
Editor Reviewers
AuthorsEditor Reviewers
Authors
Editor Reviewers
Authors
Editor Reviewers
Authors
Pre-publication Y1 Y2 Y3
11
12
13
ALM Reports
alm.plos.org
Allows researchers, institutions & funders to: • create a report of the ALMs for a
single or set of PLOS articles • view a summary of the metrics
along with an accompanying set of data visualizations.
Search based on: • keyword• author name & country • affiliation• publication date• subject areas• funder
Open Evaluation: Importance to Science & Shared Knowledge
This work makes a minor contribution to the field of study
This work makes a significant contribution to science knowledge
This work advances the field
If the user selects either of these two options, display the following:
If the user selects either of these two options, display the following:
This work is a major scientific breakthrough
This work has an important or novel method
This work will lead to reinterpretation of well- established findings
This work opens a new area of inquiry in the field
This work has an important or significant conclusion:
This work makes little to no contribution to science knowledge
I think this work was not worth doing
15