beverly park woolf university of massachusetts/amherst u.s.a [email protected]

21
Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A [email protected]

Upload: abigayle-cobb

Post on 24-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Beverly Park Woolf

University of Massachusetts/Amherst

U.S.A

[email protected]

Page 2: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Introduction

Features of Intelligent Tutors

Two Example Tutors

Three Disciplines

Components of Intelligent Tutors

Page 3: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Main Drivers for a Change in Education

Artificial intelligence (AI) which has led to a deeper understanding of how to represent knowledge, especially “how to” knowledge, such as procedural knowledge and reasoning about knowledge;

Cognitive science has led to a deeper understanding of how people think, solve problems and learn; and

The Web provides an unlimited source of information, available anytime and anyplace.

Page 4: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

• Internet provides a location--but not an education

Page 5: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Issues addressed by this research

• What is the nature of knowledge?

• How is knowledge represented?

• How can an individual student be helped to learn?

• What styles of teaching interactions are effective and when?

• What misconceptions do learners have?

Page 6: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Intelligent Tutors Do Improve Learning

• Intelligent tutors – produce the same improvement as one-on-one human tutoring and

effectively reduce by one-third to one-half the time required for learning [Regian, 1997]. (One-on-one tutoring increases performance to around 98% in a standard classroom [Bloom, 1984]).

– increase effectiveness by 30% as compared to traditional instruction [Fletcher, 199; Region, 1997]

• Networked versions reduce the need for training support personnel by about 70% and operating costs by about 92%.

• One-on-one tutoring increases performance to around the 98% in a standard classroom [Bloom, 1984].

Page 7: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Traditional Education Technology:

• Is “frame-based” or directed; each page, every instructor response and every sequence or path of topics is predefined by the author and presented in a lock-step fashion.

• Assumes that an instructional designer can specify the correct learning sequence for all students, months before a student interacts with the

software.

Page 8: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Features of Intelligent Tutors

Generativity Student modeling Expert modeling Instructional modeling Self-Improving

No agreement exists on which features are necessary to define an intelligent tutor. Many computer aided instructional systems contain one or more of the features listed above. Teaching systems lie along a continuum that runs from simple frame-based systems to very sophisticated and intelligent tutoring. The most sophisticated systems include, to varying degrees, these features.

Page 9: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Features of Intelligent Tutors

Generativity --(i.e., generate appropriate problems, hints and help, customized to student learning needs.)

Student modeling-- (i.e. assess the current state of the student’s knowledge and learning needs and do something instructionally useful on the basis of this assessment)

Expert modeling-- (i. e. assess and model expert performance in the domain and to

do something instructionally useful on the basis of this assessment) Instructional modeling--(i.e., change the teaching mode based on inferences about

the student’s learning).

Self-Improving-- (i.e., ability to monitor, evaluate and improve its own teaching performance as a result of experience.)

Page 10: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Assumptions of Intelligent Tutors

• Intelligent reasoning can be included in educational software (e.g., simulations, games or instruction) to support both teachers and student;

• Student thinking processes can be

– modeled and tracked

• Student actions can be predicted, understood and remediated

• Teacher knowledge can be codified and carefully presented to a students

Page 11: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

AnimalWatch, Example Tutor

Example of a simple addition problem in AnimalWatch

AnimalWatch provided effective, confidence-enhancing arithmetic instruction for elementary students.

Page 12: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

AnimalWatch

Example hint on a simple multiplication problem

In contrast to common drill-and-practice systems, AnimalWatch modified its responses to conform to the students’ learning styles. The tutor presented problems that required

increasingly challenging application of the cognitive subtasks involved in solving the

problems (e.g. adding fractions with like denominators, adding fractions with different denominators, etc.).

Page 13: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Cardiac TutorSimulation

IV In

Compressing

Intubating

Medical Record

Not Ventilating

Discharge

Worse 47/ 5 Better

Chronic Wellness: No Significant Risk

0:39

The Simulated Patient.

The intravenous line has been installed (“IV in”), chest compressions are in progress, ventilation has not yet begun and the electronic shock system is discharged. The icons on the chest and near the face indicate that compressions are in progress and ventilation is not being used.

Page 14: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Cardiac TutorThe Cardiac Tutor was generative because each case or patient situation was

dynamically altered, in the middle of the case, to provide the particular arrythmia that a student needed to experience.

The tutor had a complex domain model represented rules of each arrythmias and the required therapy. Nodes represented states of cardiac arrest or arrythmias and arcs represented the probability that a the simulated patient would move to a new physiological state following a specified treatment.

The student model tracked student responses to each arrythmia. Student action was connected to the original simulation state so the student could request additional

information about past actions.

Page 15: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

AnimalWatchAnimalWatch was generative since all math problems, hints and help were

generated on the fly based on student learning needs observed by the tutor.

The tutor modeled expert knowledge of arithmetic as a topic network with nodes such as ``subtract fractions'' or ``multiply whole numbers.”

Student modeling dynamically recorded each sub-task learned or needed based on student action.

The tutor was self-improving in that it used machine-learning techniques to predict how long a student needed to solve a problem and each student’s proficiency.

Page 16: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

This Research AreaEncompasses Several Disciplines

ComputerScience

Psychology

Education

Artificial IntelligenceDatabases

MultimediaTelecommunication

CSCW

Theories of LearningKnowledge AcquisitionTheories of Knowledge

Theories of InstructionInstructional Technology

Instructional Design

Page 17: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Tools and Methods arederived from:

• Artificial Intelligence

– Design and build systems that exhibit intelligence

• Cognitive Science

– Investigates how intelligent entities (human or computer) interact with their environment, and acquire

• Education

– Explore effective methods of supporting teaching and learning

Page 18: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

New Disciplines Have Formed

ComputerScience

Psychology

Interactive EnvironmentsDistance Learning

Computer Assisted Instruction

Cognitive ScienceHuman Computer Interfaces

Simulation/ Modeling Ed. Psych

Intelligent TutoringSystems

Cognitive Tools

Education

Page 19: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu
Page 20: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Fractions

Fraction Readiness

Similar Denominators

Find LCM Multiply All fractions

Dissimilar Denominators

Addition /Subtraction Multiplication/Division

Fractions

Represent Domain Knowledge

Page 21: Beverly Park Woolf University of Massachusetts/Amherst U.S.A Bev@cs.umass.edu

Cardiac Resuscitation

Represent Domain Knowledge

•brady

•asys

•vtach

•vfib

•brady

•asys

•vtach

•sinus

•vfib •30%•60% in 10 sec

•10%

•10% in 10 sec

•25%

•65%

•GOAL