beta calco inc. v. scott lamp - complaint

Upload: sarah-burstein

Post on 03-Apr-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    1/28

    1

    IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

    EASTERN DIVISION

    BETA-CALCO, INC.25 Kodiak Crescent

    Toronto, OntarioM3J 3E5Canada

    Plaintiff ,

    v.

    SCOTT ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING andSCOTT LAMP CO., INC.355 Watt DriveFairfield CA 94534

    Defendant .

    Civil Action No.

    JUDGE

    COMPLAINT

    JURY TRIAL DEMAND

    For its Complaint against Scott Architectural Lighting (Scott Lighting) and Scott Lamp

    Co., Inc. (Scott Lamp) (collectively with Scott Lighting, Scott), Beta-Calco, Inc. (Beta-Calco)

    states as follows:

    THE PARTIES

    1. Beta-Calco is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Province of

    Ontario, Canada, having its principal place of business at 25 Kodiak Crescent, Toronto, Ontario,

    M3J 3E5, Canada. Beta-Calco is a leader in the design and manufacture of architectural lighting

    products.

    2. On information and belief, Scott Lamp Company, Inc., is a corporation organized

    and existing under the laws of California, having its principal place of business at 355 Watt Drive,

    Fairfield, California 94534.

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/13 1 of 6. PageID #: 1

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    2/28

    2

    3. On information and belief, Scott Architectural Lighting is a sister company or

    division of Scott Lamp and has its principal place of business at 355 Watt Drive, Fairfield, California

    94534.

    4. On information and belief, Scott manufactures and sells architectural lighting

    products.

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    5. This is a civil action, arising under the patent statutes, 35 U.S.C. 101 et seq., and in

    particular 35 U.S.C. 271, 281 and 289, against Scott for infringement of United States Design

    Patent No. D574,993 (the 993 Patent). A true and accurate copy of the 993 Patent is attached as

    Exhibit A .

    6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a).

    7. Scott is subject to the personal jurisdiction of this Court and venue is proper in this

    District because, on information and belief, Scott engages in continuous and systematic business

    within this district.

    8. Scott is subject to the personal jurisdiction of this Court and venue is proper in this

    District also because, on information and belief, Scott is selling and offering to sell its accused

    products in this judicial district, including to Lighting Dynamics Inc., located at 211 Springside

    Drive, Akron, Ohio 44333, and has placed its accused products into the stream of commerce in this

    judicial district.

    9. Venue in the Northern District of Ohio is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

    1391(b)(2) or (3) and 1400(b).

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/13 2 of 6. PageID #: 2

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    3/28

    3

    COUNT I: INFRINGEMENT OF THE 993 PATENT

    10. Beta-Calco incorporates by reference herein the allegations of Paragraphs 1-9 of this

    Complaint.

    11. Beta-Calco is the owner by way of assignment of the 993 Patent entitled LIGHT

    FIXTURE. The 993 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark

    Office (USPTO) on August 12, 2008. The 993 Patent is in force and effect and is presumed valid

    under the U.S. patent laws.

    12. Upon information and belief, Scott has been, and is, directly infringing the 993

    Patent by making, using, selling and/or offering for sale light fixtures, including Scotts S2560 model

    pendant light fixture (the S2560), that infringe the ornamental design claim of the 993 Patent. A

    true and accurate copy of Scotts catalog for the S2560 pendant light fixture is attached as Exhibit

    B . A comparison of the light fixture of the 993 Patent and the S2560 pendant light fixture is shown

    below:

    The 993 Patent The S2560

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/13 3 of 6. PageID #: 3

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    4/28

    4

    13. As shown in paragraph 12, based on a visual comparison of the pictured design of

    the 993 Patent and the design of the S2560, an ordinary observer, giving such attention as a

    purchaser usually gives, would consider the two designs to be substantially the same. Both designs

    have an exterior frusto-conical housing that is generally transparent and an interior cylindrical

    housing for a source of light that is visible through the exterior housing. Additionally, the lower

    portion of the exterior housing of both designs is not generally transparent.

    14. On March 28, 2013, Beta-Calco, by way of its counsel, sent a notice of infringement

    letter to Scott. On information and belief, as of March 29, 2013, Scott was aware of Beta-Calcos

    allegation that the S2560 infringes the 993 Patent.

    15. On or about April 3, 2013, Scott responded to Beta-Calcos notice letter. A true and

    accurate copy of the April 3, 2013 letter is attached asExhibit C . Beta-Calco and Scott exchanged

    additional correspondence dated May 1, 2013 and May 17, 2013. A true and accurate copy of Beta-

    Calcos May 1, 2013 letter to Scott is attached asExhibit D . A true and accurate copy of Scotts

    May 17, 2013 letter to Beta-Calco is attached asExhibit E .

    16. Scott has knowingly and willfully infringed the 993 Patent. Scott will continue to

    infringe the 993 Patent, causing Beta-Calco substantial and irreparable damage, unless enjoined by

    this Court.

    17. Beta-Calco will be greatly, immediately and irreparably harmed unless the Court

    enjoins Scott and its agents, affiliates, servants, employees, attorneys, representatives, and all others

    acting on their behalf from infringing the 993 Patent.

    18. Beta-Calco has also suffered monetary damages in an amount not yet determined

    because of Scotts infringement of the 993 Patent.

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/13 4 of 6. PageID #: 4

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    5/28

    5

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    Beta-Calco prays for the following relief:

    (a) A judgment that Scott has infringed the 993 Patent and continues to do so;

    (b) A judgment that Scotts infringement of the 993 Patent has been willful;

    (c) A judgment against Scott awarding Beta-Calco damages equal to all revenues and

    profits derived by Scott from Scotts infringement of the 993 Patent pursuant to 35

    U.S.C. 289;

    (d) A judgment against Scott awarding Beta-Calco damages suffered pursuant to 35

    U.S.C. 284 on account of Scotts infringement of the 993 Patent;

    (e) A judgment that Beta-Calco damages be trebled pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and

    that punitive damages be assessed against Scott;

    (f) A permanent injunction against Scott and any entity acting in concert with it,

    pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283, preventing Scott and any such entity from infringing the

    993 Patent;

    (g) A judgment that this is an exceptional case and that Beta-Calco be awarded

    reasonable attorney fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; and

    (h) A judgment that Scott be directed to pay Beta-Calco its costs incurred herein and

    such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable.

    JURY DEMAND

    Beta-Calco respectfully requests a trial by jury for all issues so triable.

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/13 5 of 6. PageID #: 5

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    6/28

    6

    Dated: July 17, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

    s/Nicholas J. GingoMark C. Johnson (0072625)

    Nicholas J. Gingo (0083684)R ENNER , O TTO , BOISSELLE & SKLAR , LLP 1621 Euclid Avenue, Nineteenth FloorCleveland, Ohio 44115

    Telephone: (216) 621-1113Facsimile: (216) 621-6165

    Attorneys for Beta-Calco, Inc.

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/13 6 of 6. PageID #: 6

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    7/28

    6 5HY CIVIL COVER SHEETKH -6 FLYLO FRYHU VKHHW DQG WKHLQIRUPDWLRQ FRQWDLQHG KHUHLQ QHLWKHU UHSODFH QRU VXSSOHPHQW WKH ILOLQJ DQGVHUYLFH RI SOHD

    SURYLGHG E\ ORFDO UXOHV RIFRXUW 7KLV IRUP DSSURYHG E\ WKH -XGLFLDO &RQIHUHQFH RI WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV LQ 6HSWHPEHU LV UHTXLUHGSXUSRVH RI LQLWLDWLQJ WKH FLYLO GRFNHW VKHHW(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)

    . (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS

    (b) &RXQW\RI5HVLGHQFH RI )LUVW /LVWHG 3ODLQWLII &RXQW\ RI 5HVLGHQFH RI )LUVW /LVWHG 'HIHQGDQW(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)

    127( ,1 /$1' &21'(01$7,21 &$6(6 86( 7+( /2&$7,21 2)7+( 75$&7 2) /$1' ,192/9('

    (c) $WWRUQH\V(Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) $WWRUQH\V(If Known)

    I. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Pl(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant)

    8 6 *RYHUQPHQW u )HGHUDO 4XHVWLRQ PTF DEF PTF DE3ODLQWLII (U.S. Government Not a Party) &LWL]HQ RI 7KLV 6WDWH u u ,QFRUSRUDWHGor 3ULQFLSDO 3ODFH u

    RI %XVLQHVV ,Q 7KLV 6WDWH

    8 6 *RYHUQPHQW u 'LYHUVLW\ &LWL]HQ RI $QRWKHU 6WDWHu u ,QFRUSRUDWHGand 3ULQFLSDO 3ODFHu'HIHQGDQW (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) RI %XVLQHVV ,Q $QRWKHU 6WDWH

    &LWL]HQ RU 6XEMHFW RI D u u )RUHLJQ 1DWLRQ u)RUHLJQ &RXQWU\

    V. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an X in One Box Only)CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES

    ,QVXUDQFH PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY u 'UXJ 5HODWHG 6HL]XUH u $SSHDO 86& u )DOVH &ODLPV $FW0DULQH u $LUSODQH u 3HUVRQDO ,QMXU\ RI 3URSHUW\ 86& u :LWKGUDZDO u 6WDWH 5HDSSRUW0LOOHU $FW u $LUSODQH 3URGXFW 3URGXFW /LDELOLW\u 2WKHU 86& u $QWLWUXVW1HJRWLDEOH ,QVWUXPHQW /LDELOLW\ u +HDOWK &DUH u %DQNV DQG %DQNL5HFRYHU\ RI 2YHUSD\PHQW u $VVDXOW /LEHO 3KDUPDFHXWLFDO PROPERTY RIGHTS u &RPPHUFH

    (QIRUFHPHQW RI -XGJPHQW 6ODQGHU 3HUVRQDO ,QM XU\ u &RS\ULJKWV u 'HSRUWDWLRQ0HGLFDUH $FW u )HGHUDO (PSOR\HUV 3URGXFW /LDELOLW\ u 3DWHQW u 5DFNHWHHU ,QIOXH5HFRYHU\ RI 'HIDXOWHG /LDELOLW\ u $VEHVWRV 3HUVRQDO u 7UDGHPDUN &RUUXSW 2UJDQ

    6WXGHQW /RDQV u 0DULQH ,QMXU\ 3URGXFW u &RQVXPHU &UHGLW([FOXGHV 9HWHUDQV u 0DULQH 3URGXFW /LDELOLW\ LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY u &DEOH 6DW 79

    5HFRYHU\ RI 2YHUSD\PHQW /LDELOLW\ PERSONAL PROPERTY u )DLU /DERU 6WDQGDUGV u +,$ II u 6HFXULWLHV &RPPRI 9HWHUDQV %HQHILWVu 0RWRU 9HKLFOH u 2WKHU )UDXG $FW u %O DFN / XQJ ([FKDQJH

    6WRFNKROGHUV 6XLWV u 0RWRU 9HKLFOH u 7UXWK LQ /HQGLQJ u /DERU 0DQDJHPHQW u ',:& ',:: J u 2WKHU 6WDWXWRU2WKHU &RQWUDFW 3URGXFW /LDELOLW\u 2WKHU3HUVRQDO 5HODWLRQV u 66,' 7LWOH ;9, u $JULFXOWXUDO $FW&RQWUDFW 3URGXFW /LDELOLW\u 2WKHU 3HUVRQDO 3URSHUW\ 'DPDJH u 5DLOZD\ /DERU $FW u 56, J u (QYLURQPHQWDO 0)UDQFKLVH ,QMXU\ u 3URSHUW\ 'DPDJH u )DPLO\ DQG 0HGLFDO u )UHHGRP RI ,QIRUPD

    u 3HUVRQDO ,QMXU\ 3URGXFW /LDELOLW\ /HDYH $FW $FW0HGLFDO 0DOSUDFWLFH u 2WKHU /DERU /LWLJDWLRQ u $UELWUDWLRQ

    REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS u (PSOR\HH 5HWLUHPHQW FEDERAL TAX SUITS u $GPLQLVWUDWLYH/DQG &RQGHPQDWLRQ u 2WKHU &LYLO 5LJKWV Habeas Corpus: ,QFRPH 6HFXULW\ $FW u 7D[HV 8 6 3ODLQWLII $FW 5HYLHZ RU)RUHFORVXUH u 9RWLQJ u $OLHQ 'HWDLQHH RU 'HIHQGDQW $JHQF\ 'HFLV5HQW /HDVH (MHFWPHQW u (PSOR\PHQW u 0RWLRQV WR 9DFDWH u ,567KLUG 3DUW\ u &RQVWLWXWLRQD7RUWV WR /DQG u +RXVLQJ 6HQWHQFH 86& 6WDWH 6WDWXWHV7RUW 3URGXFW /LDELOLW\ $FFRPPRGDWLRQVu *HQHUDO$OO 2WKHU 5HDO 3URSHUW\u $PHU Z 'LVDELOLWLHVu 'HDWK 3HQDOW\ IMMIGRATION

    (PSOR\PHQW Other: u 1DWXUDOL]DWLRQ $SSOLFDWLRQu $PHU Z 'LVDELOLWLHVu 0DQGDPXV 2WKHU u 2WKHU ,PPLJUDWLRQ

    2WKHU u &LYLO 5LJKWV $FWLRQVu (GXFDWLRQ u 3 ULVRQ &RQGLWLRQ

    u &LYLO 'HWDLQHH&RQGLWLRQV RI&RQILQHPHQW

    V. ORIGIN (Place an X in One Box Only)

    2ULJLQDO3URFHHGLQJu 5HPRYHG IURP6WDWH &RXUW

    u 5HPDQGHG IURP$SSHOODWH &RXUWu 5HLQVWDWHG RU 5HRSHQHG

    u 7UDQVIHUUHG IURP$QRWKHU 'LVWULFW(specify)

    u 0XOWLGLVWULFW/LWLJDWLRQ

    VI. CAUSE OF ACTION

    &LWH WKH 8 6 &LYLO 6WDWXWH XQGHU ZKLFK \RX DUH ILOLQJ(Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity )

    %ULHI GHVFULSWLRQ RI FDXVH

    VII. REQUESTED INCOMPLAINT:

    u &+(&. ,) 7+,6 ,6 $ CLASS ACTION81'(5 58/( ) 5 &Y 3

    DEMAND $ &+(&.

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    8/28

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

    I. Civil Categories: (Please check one category only).

    1. General Civil2. Administrative Review/Social Security3. Habeas Corpus Death Penalty

    *If under Title 28, 2255, name the SENTENCING JUDGE:

    CASE NUMBER:

    II. RELATED OR REFILED CASES . See LR 3.1 which provides in pertinent part: "If an action is filed or removed to this Courtand assigned to a District Judge after which it is discontinued, dismissed or remanded to a State cour t, andsubsequently refiled , it shall be assigned to the same Judge who received the initial case assignment without regardfor the place of holding court in which the case was refiled. Counsel or a party without counsel shall be responsible for bringing such cases to the attention of the Court by responding to the questions included on the Civil Cover Sheet."

    This action is RELATED to another PENDING civil case. This action is REFILED pursuant to LR 3.1 .

    f applicable, please indicate on page 1 in section VIII, the name of the Judge and case number.

    II. In accordance with Local Civil Rule 3.8 , actions involving counties in the Eastern Division shall be filed at any of thedivisional offices therein. Actions involving counties in the Western Division shall be filed at the Toledo office. For thepurpose of determining the proper division, and for statistical reasons, the following information is requested.

    ANSWER ONE PARAGRAPH ONLY. ANSWER PARAGRAPHS 1 THRU 3 IN ORDER. UPON FINDING WHICHPARAGRAPH APPLIES TO YOUR CASE, ANSWER IT AND STOP.

    (1) Resident defendant. If the defendant resides in a county within this district, please set forth the name of suchcountyCOUNTY:Corporation For the purpose of answering the above, a corporation is deemed to be a resident of that county in whichit has its principal place of business in that district.

    (2) Non-Resident defendant. If no defendant is a resident of a county in this district, please set forth the countywherein the cause of action arose or the event complained of occurred.

    COUNTY:

    (3) Other Cases . If no defendant is a resident of this district, or if the defendant is a corporation not having a principleplace of business within the district, and the cause of action arose or the event complained of occurred outsidethis district, please set forth the county of the plaintiff's residence.

    COUNTY:

    V. The Counties in the Northern District of Ohio are divided into divisions as shown below. After the county isdetermined in Section III, please check the appropriate division.

    EASTERN DIVISION

    AKRON (Counties: Carroll, Holmes, Portage, Stark, Summit, Tuscarawas and Wayne)CLEVELAND (Counties: Ashland, Ashtabula, Crawford, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake,

    Lorain, Medina and Richland)YOUNGSTOWN (Counties: Columbiana, Mahoning and Trumbull)

    WESTERN DIVISION

    TOLEDO (Counties: Allen, Auglaize, Defiance, Erie, Fulton, Hancock, Hardin, Henry,Huron, Lucas, Marion, Mercer, Ottawa, Paulding, Putnam, Sandusky, SenecaVanWert, Williams, Wood and Wyandot)

    Summit

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 07/17/13 2 of 3. PageID #: 8

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    9/28

    -6 5HYHUVH 5HY

    INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44

    $XWKRULW\ )RU &LYLO &RYHU 6KHHW

    7KH -6 FLYLO FRYHU VKHHW DQG WKH LQIRUPDWLRQ FRQWDLQHG KHUHLQ QHLWKHU UHSODFHV QRU VXSSOHPHQWV WKH ILOLQJVUHTXLUHG E\ ODZ H[FHSW DV SURYLGHG E\ ORFDO UXOHV RI FRXUW 7KLV IRUP DSSURYHG E\ WKH -XGLFLDO &RQIHUHQFH RI WKH 8QUHTXLUHG IRU WKH XVH RI WKH &OHUN RI &RXUW IRU WKH SXUSRVH RI LQLWLDWLQJ WKH FLYLO GRFNHW VKHHW &RQVHTXHQWO\&RXUW IRU HDFK FLYLO FRPSODLQW ILOHG 7KH DWWRUQH\ ILOLQJ D FDVH VKRXOG FRPSOHWH WKH IRUP DV IROORZV

    I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. (QWHU QDPHV ODVW ILUVW PLGGOH LQLWLDO RI SODLQWLII DQG GHIHQGDQW ,I WKH SODLQWLII RU GH

    RQO\ WKH IXOO QDPH RU VWDQGDUG DEEUHYLDWLRQV ,I WKH SODLQWLII RU GHIHQGDQW LV DQ RIILFLDO ZLWKLQ D JRYHUQPWKHQ WKH RIILFLDO JLYLQJ ERWK QDPH DQG WLWOH(b) County of Residence. )RU HDFK FLYLO FDVH ILOHG H[FHSW 8 6 SODLQWLII FDVHV HQWHU WKH QDPH RI WKH FRXQW\ ZKHUH WK

    WLPH RI ILOLQJ ,Q 8 6 SODLQWLII FDVHV HQWHU WKH QDPH RI WKH FRXQW\ LQ ZKLFK WKH ILUVW OLVWHG GHIHQGDQW UHVLFRQGHPQDWLRQ FDVHV WKH FRXQW\ RI UHVLGHQFH RI WKH GHIHQGDQW LV WKH ORFDWLRQ RI WKH WUDFW RI ODQG LQYRO

    (c) Attorneys. (QWHU WKH ILUP QDPH DGGUHVV WHOHSKRQH QXPEHU DQG DWWRUQH\ RI UHFRUG ,I WKHUH DUH VHYHUDO DWWLQ WKLV VHFWLRQ VHH DWWDFKPHQW

    II. Jurisdiction. 7KH EDVLV RI MXULVGLFWLRQ LV VHW IRUWK XQGHU 5XOH D ) 5 &Y 3 ZKLFK UHTXLUHV WKDW MXULVGLFWLRQLQ RQH RI WKH ER[HV ,I WKHUH LV PRUH WKDQ RQH EDVLV RI MXULVGLFWLRQ SUHFHGHQFH LV JLYHQ LQ WKH RUGHU VKRZQ8QLWHG 6WDWHV SODLQWLII -XULVGLFWLRQ EDVHG RQ 8 6 & DQG 6XLWV E\ DJHQFLHV DQG RIILFHUV RI WKH 8QLWHG8QLWHG 6WDWHV GHIHQGDQW :KHQ WKH SODLQWLII LV VXLQJ WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV LWV RIILFHUV RU DJHQFLHV SODFH D)HGHUDO TXHVWLRQ 7KLV UHIHUV WR VXLWV XQGHU 8 6 & ZKHUH MXULVGLFWLRQ DULVHV XQGHU WKH &RQVWLWXWWR WKH &RQVWLWXWLRQ DQ DFW RI &RQJUHVV RU D WUHDW\ RI WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV ,Q FDVHV ZKHUH WKH 8 6 LV D SDUW SUHFHGHQFH DQG ER[ RU VKRXOG EH PDUNHG'LYHUVLW\ RI FLWL]HQVKLS 7KLV UHIHUV WR VXLWV XQGHU 8 6 & ZKHUH SDUWLHV DUH FLWL]HQV RI GLIIHUHQW VWDWFLWL]HQVKLS RI WKH GLIIHUHQW SDUWLHV PXVW EH FKHFNHG. 6HH 6HFWLRQ ,,, EHORZ; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversitycases.

    III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. 7KLV VHFWLRQ RI WKH -6 LV WR EH FRPSOHWHG LI GLYHUVLW\ RI FLWL]HQVKLS ZDVVHFWLRQ IRU HDFK SULQFLSDO SDUW\

    IV. Nature of Suit. 3ODFH DQ ; LQ WKH DSSURSULDWH ER[ ,I WKH QDWXUH RI VXLW FDQQRW EH GHWHUPLQHG EH VXUH WKH FDXVVXIILFLHQW WR HQDEOH WKH GHSXW\ FOHUN RU WKH VWDWLVWLFDO FOHUN V LQ WKH $GPLQLVWUDWLYH 2IILFH WR GHWHURQH QDWXUH RI VXLW VHOHFW WKH PRVW GHILQLWLYH

    V. Origin. 3ODFH DQ ; LQ RQH RI WKH VL[ ER[HV2ULJLQDO 3URFHHGLQJV &DVHV ZKLFK RULJLQDWH LQ WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV GLVWULFW FRXUWV5HPRYHG IURP 6WDWH &RXUW 3URFHHGLQJV LQLWLDWHG LQ VWDWH FRXUWV PD\ EH UHPRYHG WR WKH GLVWULFW FRXUW

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

    VI. Cause of Action. 5HSRUW WKH FLYLO VWDWXWH GLUHFWO\ UHODWHG WR WKH FDXVH RI DFWLRQ DQG JLYH D EULHI GHVFULSWDo not cite jurisdictionalstatutes unless diversity. ([DPSOH 8 6 &LYLO 6WDWXWH 86& %ULHI 'HVFULSWLRQ 8QDXWKRUL]HG UHFHSWLRQ RI FDEOH VHU

    VII. Requested in Complaint. &ODVV $FWLRQ 3ODFH DQ ; LQ WKLV ER[ LI \RX DUH ILOLQJ D FODVV DFWLRQ XQGHU 5XOH ) 5 &Y 3'HPDQG ,Q WKLV VSDFH HQWHU WKH DFWXDO GROODU DPRXQW EHLQJ GHPDQGHG RU LQGLFDWH RWKHU GHPDQG VXFK DV D S-XU\ 'HPDQG &KHFN WKH DSSURSULDWH ER[ WR LQGLFDWH ZKHWKHU RU QRW D MXU\ LV EHLQJ GHPDQGHG

    VIII. Related Cases. 7KLV VHFWLRQ RI WKH -6 LV XVHG WR UHIHUHQFH UHODWHG SHQGLQJ FDVHV LI DQ\ ,I WKHUH DUH UHODWHGQXPEHUV DQG WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ MXGJH QDPHV IRU VXFK FDVHV

    Date and Attorney Signature. 'DWH DQG VLJQ WKH FLYLO FRYHU VKHHW

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 07/17/13 3 of 3. PageID #: 9

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    10/28

    AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

    U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the

    __________ District of __________

    )))))))

    Plaintiff

    v. Civil Action No.

    Defendant

    SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

    To: (Defendants name and address)

    A lawsuit has been filed against you.

    Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) or 60 days if youare the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney,whose name and address are:

    If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

    CLERK OF COURT

    Date:Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

    Northern District of Ohio

    BETA-CALCO, INC.

    SCOTT ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING and SCOTTLAMP CO., INC.

    SCOTT LAMP CO., INC.355 Watt Drive

    Fairfield, CA 94534

    Mark C. JohnsonRenner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP1621 Euclid Ave., 19th Floor Cleveland, OH 44115(216) 621-1113

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 07/17/13 1 of 2. PageID #: 10

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    11/28

    AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

    Civil Action No.

    PROOF OF SERVICE

    (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

    This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

    was received by me on (date) .

    u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

    on (date) ; or

    u I left the summons at the individuals residence or usual place of abode with (name)

    , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

    on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individuals last known address; or

    u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

    designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

    on (date) ; or

    u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

    u Other (specify):

    .

    My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

    I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

    Date:Servers signature

    Printed name and title

    Servers address

    Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

    0.00

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 07/17/13 2 of 2. PageID #: 11

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    12/28

    AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

    U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the

    __________ District of __________

    )))))))

    Plaintiff

    v. Civil Action No.

    Defendant

    SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

    To: (Defendants name and address)

    A lawsuit has been filed against you.

    Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) or 60 days if youare the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney,whose name and address are:

    If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

    CLERK OF COURT

    Date:Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

    Northern District of Ohio

    BETA-CALCO, INC.

    SCOTT ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING and SCOTTLAMP CO., INC.

    SCOTT ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING355 Watt Drive

    Fairfield, CA 94534

    Mark C. JohnsonRenner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP1621 Euclid Ave., 19th Floor Cleveland, OH 44115(216) 621-1113

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 07/17/13 1 of 2. PageID #: 12

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    13/28

    AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

    Civil Action No.

    PROOF OF SERVICE

    (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

    This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

    was received by me on (date) .

    u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

    on (date) ; or

    u I left the summons at the individuals residence or usual place of abode with (name)

    , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

    on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individuals last known address; or

    u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

    designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

    on (date) ; or

    u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

    u Other (specify):

    .

    My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

    I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

    Date:Servers signature

    Printed name and title

    Servers address

    Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

    0.00

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 07/17/13 2 of 2. PageID #: 13

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    14/28

    US00D574993S

    ( 1 2 ) United States Design Patent a o ) Patent NO.: Silver

    4 5 ) Date of Patent :

    US D574,993 S ** ug. 12,2008

    (54) IGHT FIXTURE (75) nventor: Remy Silver, Toronto (CA) (73) ssignee: Beta Calco Inc., Ontario (CA) (**) erm: 4 Years (21) ppl.No.: 9/284,575 (22)

    iled:

    ep. 11, 2007

    (30)

    oreign Application Priority Data

    Mar. 14 , 2007 (CA) 119893

    (51) OC(8)Cl

    26-03

    (52)

    .S. CI

    D26/88; D26/128

    (58) Field of Classification Search D26/72, D26/84, 85, 86, 88-91, 118, 128, 130, 131, D26/135, 137; 62/147, 404, 407

    See application file for complete search history.

    (56) eferences Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 5,134,554 * /1992 onato et al 62/407 D433,526 * 1/2000 inissi et al D26/88 D518,914 * /2006 ranner D26/88 7,249,871 B2* /2007 he n 362/407 D563,021 S * /2008 etfieldetal D26/72

    i! i I I I 11 1111111111

    1111 1 1111111111111111

    1 *'! n

    D563,025 S * 2/2008 Hetfieldetal

    D26/72

    OTHER PUBLICATIONS

    Hang ing endants hown n photo n . 95 of th e KEA 005 catalog.* Glass hade #SC-276 n p. 24 of th e Aug. 997 issue of Taiwan Lighting.* "Cone" fixtures #503R an d #501P by Electroline. p. 5 of th e May 2001 issue of Taiwan Lighting.*

    * cited by examiner

    Primary Examiner Clare E Heflin (74) Attorney, Agent, r Firm Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP

    (57) CLAIM

    The ornamental esign or a ight ixture, s hown and described.

    DESCRIPTION

    FIG. s a side view of the ight ixture showing my new design.

    FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the light fixture shown in FIG. 1; and,

    FIG. 3 is bottom view of the light fixture shown in FIG. 1. The broken lines shown on the drawings are for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.

    1 Claim, 1 Drawing Sheet

    ^

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-4 Filed: 07/17/13 1 of 2. PageID #: 14

    A

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    15/28

    U.S . Patent Aug. 12,2008 US D574.993 S

    FIG. 1

    F I G . 2

    rr"

    FIG. 3

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-4 Filed: 07/17/13 2 of 2. PageID #: 15

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    16/28

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    17/28

    355 WATT DRIVE FAIRFIELD, CA 94534 TEL (707) 864-2172 FAX (707) 864-2182

    www.scottarchlighting.com

    Scott Architectural Lighting Reserves The Right To Make Design Changes Without Prior Notice

    BASE ADD ADDDIMENSIONS MODEL LAMP FINISHW H X NO. CODE CODE

    10-1/2 96 16-1/4 S2560 * 1C42T BA, PT

    Order as a Complete Unit: Model No. + Lamp Code + Finish Code + Option Code + Voltage

    ORDERING INFORMATION

    TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FINISHES OPTIONS

    LAMPING FEATURES

    C42T = 42 Watt Triple Tube Compact Fluorescent 4 Pin Electronic, GX24Q-4 Base

    EM Emergency Battery Pack with Fluorescent Lighting(Integral)

    OA Specify Overall Height ofFixture in Inches; E.G. OA48

    DIM Dimmable Integral Ballast(Consult Factory)

    SB2 Clear Silver Braided Cord withTwo Adjustable Aircraft Cables

    Ballast: High Power Factor,Electronic, 120/277

    Mounting: Mounts to all Standard ElectricalJunction Boxes (by others) withHardware Provided

    BA Brushed AluminumPT Painted Finishes (Specify Color Code fromOur Standard Finish Chart)

    White SJ Cord with Two AdjustableAircraft Cables

    Integral Ballast Clear Glass Cone with Frosted Bottom Trim Opal Matte Glass Cylinder with Aluminum

    Downlight Reflector

    * Configuration operates C26T, C32T orC42T lamp options and can be labeled up

    to the highest wattage allowed

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 07/17/13 2 of 2. PageID #: 17

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    18/28

    Renner, Otto, Boiselle & Sklar, LLP1621 Euclid A venueNineteenth FloorCleveland, Ohio 44115-2191

    ATTN : Christopher B . Jacobs

    April 3, 2013

    RE: Infringement of U.S. Design Patents Nos. D574,993 and D561,928Re f : SMAR GO 103

    Dear Mr. Jacobs :

    We do not intend to violate any design patents that are currently in effect. In early automotive history ,Henry Ford sought to supply the masses with an affordable automobile; his progress in doing so wasslowed by ALAM, Association of Licensed Automobile Manufacturers, which claimed to have 25 patentscovering the automobile and did not allow Ford a license to manufacture autos. Ford took the ALAM tocourt and as we all know from history , Ford won and all patents held by ALAM were found to be in valid.

    With reference to our models you have in question, our S2401 Series is substantially different than theBeta-Calco item you reference. See our drawing (enclo se d) representing this series , as well see the item ofother manufacturers that are visually similar, Winona and Visa. Your claim is eerily reminiscent of theALAM claims against Henry Ford.

    As for our pendant, S2560, it is by far, substantially different from the Beta-Calco item you reference.

    Please further be put on notice that further bullying-type attempts to curtail the items produced by ScottLamp Company and Scott Architectural will be met with appropriate actions on our part.

    Dennis J. Scott

    P r ~~ ~E n~

    355 Watt Drive Fairfield, CA 94534 PH (707) 864-2066 FAX (707) 864 - 2076www sco ttlamp. co m

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 07/17/13 1 of 7. PageID #: 18

    C

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    19/28

    8" SQ . - - - - - 1

    OVERALLHIEG HTTO BE

    ADVISED

    29 3/4"

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    CANOPY

    (/> l /16" STAINLESS STEELCABLE

    CLEAR SILVER BRAIDEDELECTRICALCORD

    (4) OPAL MATTEACRY LIC PANELS

    n13 7 8" )

    el

    ISOMETRIC VIEW

    ~ W H I TE EGG CRATELOUVERS

    l - 13 7 /8 " SQ. _jELEVATION VIEW

    1 37 / 8 "~

    U.L. LISTEDFLUORESCENT FIXTURE

    BOTTOM VIEW

    ITEM NUMBER :

    PEN DANT - 52401 - S ERI ES

    A R C H I T E C T U R A LLIG H TING

    355 W ATTDR IVE' FAIR FIELD, CA 94534

    PH: (70 7)864 -2 1 72FAX: (707)864 -2 182

    LAM P ING (BY O THERS) : TYPE: W EIG HT: DW G NUMBER

    (4) 40 WATT BIAX COMPA CT FLUORESCENT 4 PINFINISH : VOLTAGE : SCALE : DATE

    (BA) BRUSHED ALUMINUM 120 / 27 7 N/ A XX-XX-XXC O MM ENTS: APP BY: DRAW N BY: REVISIO N:

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 07/17/13 2 of 7. PageID #: 19

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    20/28

    Winona Lighting I Decorative I Pendants I 5600 Page 1 o f 1

    http :// www.winona lighting.com/products /decorative /pendants /5600 4/2/2013

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 07/17/13 3 of 7. PageID #: 20

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    21/28

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    22/28

    Delra y Li ghtin g Inc IKone Glass Pendants

    Decora tive Pendant s KONE

    C lick on thumbna il for larger view. (Popup blocker must bedisabled , scripts enabled.)

    6 10 611 620

    621 62 2 62 3

    6010

    m ~ BIM

    http :// de lray ighting .com/kone. h tm l

    ~ Interactive PDF Spec Sheet

    ~ Ph otometry Report(Right click to download IES file)

    mM Revit files ~ Redirect to

    Autodes k See k

    KONE I ns tructions (PDF ):Pendant Installation

    Page 1 o f 1

    Mor e Gloss-Pendants

    Vtew All Product s

    4/4/2013

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 07/17/13 5 of 7. PageID #: 22

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    23/28

    KONE CLEAR GLASS LUMINAIRE WITH DOWNLIGHT

    KONE CLEAR PENDANTCanopy mo unts to stan dard )- box.Compact flu o tr escent electronicballast fits ins id e fixtu re for easyaccess , metal halide ballast is incanopy. Pendant is 45" standardwith push button adjustableaircraft cable. Finish is silver withbraided power cord. G lass shadeis opal inside , clear outside ,for general illumi n at ion with cladaluminum down ligh t releccorfor task lighting . Fixtures havea twist loc k socket for secure,easy relamping. Dimming an demergency battery backup isavailab le for CFL. U.L. listed fordamp locations.

    KONE CLEAR SURFACECanopy mounts to s tandard) -box. Electron ic ballast fits onbackp late for easy access. Finis his silver. Th e dear glass shadeis rem ovable w it h ou t too ls andis for gener al illumination, aninterior clad alu minum downlig h trelecror for task lighting. Fixturesfeat ure twist lock socket for secu re,easy relampi n g. Dimming andemerge ncy optio ns are not available.

    U.L. listed for d am p locations.

    TYPE:

    ORDER NUMBER:

    I e l e c t I e l e c t I e l e c tModel# Wattage Voltage

    26,

    32or

    42 1- 120V2-277V

    Example :

    6202 II 26 11

    6202.Fluorescent

    6201Fluorescent

    9 J- 9s-+

    PROJECT:

    I e l e c t I e l e c tOption

    EM-Emerge ncy battery(pendant only).Dimm ing o nly foritems marked +.C hoose D3, D4, DS, DBor D9. (See B ac k Page)

    11EM

    6202EM

    Fluorescent

    t - 5.5"---t

    1

    50.S"

    -+

    BURBANK ,

    CALIFORNIA,

    91505

    WWW .

    DELRAY

    LIGHTING .

    COM

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 07/17/13 6 of 7. PageID #: 23

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    24/28

    ,

    FLUORESCENT

    142W PLY

    CP DISTRIBUTION

    1 0 ISO'

    120

    314

    628

    60'

    942

    COEFFICIENTS OF UTILIZATION

    % CEILING80 (20% FLOOR)% WALL70 50 300 73 73 731 65 61 582 59 54 493 54 48 424 50 43 375 46 39 336 43 35 307 40 32 2 78 37 29 249 35 27 22JO 33 25 20

    6 2 02 .42l -42W triple rubeG24q -3 electronic twist lock socketTotal lumen s: 3200Spacing crit eria: .78

    NOTES

    BALLAST INFO

    DIMMING Ballast mounted inside fooure . Dimming only avai lab le for

    item s marked t on page 1. Vo ltage must be specified . Controls lu m en output down

    to 5 %. Compatible dimmers required

    for all ball asts. D3 Advance Mark X for 26 , 32

    or42W lam p. D4 Lutron Tu -Wire for 26 or

    32 W lamp . 120V only. D5 Advance Mar k Vl l for 26 ,

    32 or 42 W lamp. DB Lutron Hi-Lume 1% for 26

    or 32 W lamp . Contro ls lu m enoutput down t o 1 % .

    D9 Lutron EcoSystem for 18,26, 32 or 42W lamp. Contro lslu m en output d own to 5% .

    EMERGENCY

    Voltage must be specified . EMemerg ency p ower provides650 lumen s for on e lamp for90 minut es . Ht.= 15.2 5"

    EM13 em ergency power provide s1300 lum ens for o ne lam p for90 minut es. Ht.=19"

    50.5''

    -+

    OPTIONS

    AL -Acry lic Lens. For security andfood serv ice installation s.Use with CF L lamp s o nly.

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 07/17/13 7 of 7. PageID #: 24

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    25/28

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 07/17/13 1 of 3. PageID #: 25

    D

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    26/28

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 07/17/13 2 of 3. PageID #: 26

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    27/28

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 07/17/13 3 of 3. PageID #: 27

  • 7/28/2019 Beta Calco Inc. v. Scott Lamp - Complaint

    28/28

    Case: 5:13-cv-01543 Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 07/17/13 1 of 1. PageID #: 28