arX

iv:1

701.

0885

0v1

[nl

in.P

S] 2

4 Ja

n 20

17

Solitary and Jacobi elliptic wave solutions of the generalized

Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation

Didier Belobo Belobo√√1, 2, 3, 4, ∗ and Tapas Das

√√5, †

1Laboratory of Nuclear, Atomic, Molecular Physics and Biophysics, University of Yaounde I

2Centre d’Excellence Africain en Technologies de l’Information

et de la Communication (CETIC), University of Yaounde I

3Laboratoire d’Analyses, de Simulations et d’Essais (LASE), IUT, University of Ngaoundere

4African Institute for Mathematical Sciences,

6 Melrose Road, Muizenberg, Cape Town, 7945, South Africa

5Kodalia Prasanna Banga High School (H.S), South 24 Parganas, 700146, India

Abstract

Exact bright, dark, antikink solitary waves and Jacobi elliptic function solutions of the gener-

alized Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation with arbitrary power-law nonlinearity will be constructed

in this work. The method used to carry out the integration is the F-expansion method. Solutions

obtained have fractional and integer negative or positive power-law nonlinearities. These solutions

have many free parameters such that they may be used to simulate many experimental situations,

and to precisely control the dynamics of the system.

Keywords: Generalized Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation, F-expansion method, solitary waves,

Jacobi elliptic function solutions.

PACS numbers: 02.30.Jr, 05.45.Yv, 47.35.Fg

∗E-mail: belobodidier@gmail.com†E-mail: tapasd20@gmail.com

1

1. Introduction

The search of exact solutions for evolution nonlinear partial differential equations

(NLPDEs) plays an important role in the study of nonlinear physical phenomena. This

is due to the fact that, nonlinear phenomena are ubiquitous in nature, thus appear in a wide

range of fields in physics, mathematical physics, and engineering. Some celebrated evolution

NLPDEs are the Hasegawa-Mima equation [1] which describes turbulence in plasma physics,

the Fitzhugh-Nagumo equation [2] that models biological neuron, the Hunter-Saxton equa-

tion [3-4] used to study waves orientation in nematic liquid crystal, the nonlinear Schrodinger

equation that models the dynamics of waves in many media such as matter waves in Bose-

Einstein condensates [5], the evolution of electromagnetic fields in fiber optics [6], the evo-

lution of gravity driven surface water waves [7], the evolution of the order parameter in the

BCS theory [8], just to name a few.

In the past five decades, a great deal of attention has been paid to the dynamics of

shallow water waves, mainly modeled by an evolution NLPDE known as the Korteweg-de

Vries (KdV) equation [9], and modified KdV equations [9]. The KdV equation is valid when

the water depth is constant and is derived under the assumption of small wave-amplitude

and large wave length. Modified KdV equations include KdV equations with varying bottom

and higher order corrections of the KdV equation. Solutions of the KdV and modified KdV

equations have actively been investigated, and include solitary waves which come from a

delicate balance between dispersion and nonlinearity, periodic waves like the Jacobi elliptic

function solutions and so on [9,10].

In 1972, the regularized long-wave equation, better known as the the Benjamin-Bona-

Mahony (BBM) equation [11] were introduced as a regularized form of the KdV equation.

As pointed out in [11,12], the BBM equation better describes long waves and, as far as the

existence, uniqueness and stability are concerned, the BBM equation has some substantial

advantages over the KdV equation [11]. Moreover, the BBM equation also finds applications

in other contexts such as the modeling of the drift of waves in plasma physics or the Rossby

waves in rotating fluids [13], wave transmission in semi-conductors and optical devices [14],

hydromagnetic waves in cold plasma, acoustic waves in anharmonic crystals, and acoustic

gravity waves in compressible fluids [11]. In the past four decades, the BBM equation and

its various versions have been intensively studied, and many types of solutions have been

2

found among them solitary waves and periodic waves which can be found in the explicit

literature. A classification of some forms of the BBM equation and their solutions can be

found in [15]. Unlike the KdV equation, the BBM equations are not exactly integrable in

the sense of the Painleve test of integrability. Nevertheless, various techniques have been

developed which help to carry out the integration of BBM equations. Among them are the

tanh and the sine-cosine methods [16], the Jacobi elliptic function expansion method [17], the

first integral method [18], the variable-coefficient balancing-act method [19], the hyperbolic

auxiliary function method [20], the homogeneous balance method [21]. A generalized (1+1)

BBM equation with dual arbitrary power-law nonlinearity may be written in dimensionless

form as [22,23]

ut + αux + (βun + γu2n)ux − δuxxt = 0, (1)

where u is the wave profile, α and δ are the dispersion coefficients, n is the arbitrary power-

law nonlinearity, β and γ the coefficients of the dual power-law nonlinearity. For α = 1,

β = 1, n = 1, γ = 0, and δ = 1 Eq.(1) recovers the BBM equation. Wazwaz solved Eq.(1)

in the case where α = 1, δ = −1, β = 0 by means of the tanh and the sine-cosine methods,

and obtained solitary and periodic solutions [24]. Yang, Tang, and Qiao constructed solitary

and periodic wave solutions of Eq.(1) for α = 0, n > 0 and δ 6= 0 using an improved tanh

function method [22]. Liu, Tian, and Wu used the Weierstrass elliptic function method to

construct two solutions of Eq.(1) for α = 0 in terms of the Weierstrass elliptic functions [25].

Biswas employed the solitary wave ansatz method and proposed a one-soliton solution of

Eq.(1) [23]. All the latter works show the importance of investigating solutions of the BBM

equation given by Eq.(1). However, to the best of our knowledge, Eq.(1) with non-vanishing

coefficients has only been tackled in the work of Ref. [23] where a one-soliton solution was

found. As an evolution NLPDE with important applications in different fields in physics, it

is important to find more solutions of Eq.(1) that may help to have a better understanding

of physical phenomena or at least give orientations for future applications. For example,

solitary and Jacobian elliptic function solutions have been intensively used for practical

applications in physics and engineering; these solutions have not been fully investigated for

the generalized BBM equation (Eq.(1)) with all non-vanishing coefficients.

The aim of this work is to construct solitary and Jacobi elliptic wave solutions of the

generalized BBM equation (Eq.(1)) with all non-vanishing coefficients. To this end, we

3

use the F-expansion method introduced in [26] which has been an accurate tool to integrate

evolution NLPDEs, along with the auxiliary ordinary equation [5,27]. The paper is organized

as follows, in Sec. 2, we construct analytical solutions of Eq.(1). Then we discuss the

characteristics and evolution of the solutions in Sec. 3. The paper is concluded in Sec. 4.

2. Analytical solutions

We start our quest of analytical solutions of Eq.(1) by setting the following traveling wave

transformation

u(x, t) = U(ζ) , ζ = kx− V t , (2)

where k is the inverse of the width of the wave and V its velocity. Inserting Eq.(2) into

Eq.(1) we obtain a nonlinear ordinary differential equation for the function U

(αk − V )Uζ + k(βUn + γU2n)Uζ + δk2V Uζζζ = 0 , (3)

with Uζ ≡ ∂U∂ζ

and Uζζζ ≡ ∂3U∂ζ3

. An integration of Eq.(3) yields

(αk − V )U + k(β

n+ 1Un+1 +

γ

2n+ 1U2n+1) + δk2V Uζζ = 0 , (4)

where the right-hand side constant of integration has been set to zero. Eq.(4) is difficult

to solve analytically, in order to find analytical solutions, we need to transform it into a

more tractable and manageable form. Toward that end, we use the transformation ω = Un.

After a little algebra, a nonlinear ordinary differential equation in terms of the function ω

is retrieved

ωωζζ + pω2 + qω3 + rω4 + s(ωζ)2 = 0 , (5)

in which the parameters p, q, r, s are given by

p =(αk − V )n

δk2V, (6a)

q =βn

δk(n + 1)V, (6b)

r =γn

δk(2n+ 1)V, (6c)

s =1− n

n, (6d)

4

with these forbidden values for n: −1,−1/2, 0, 1.

The next step is to solve Eq.(5) by means of the F-expansion method. Thus, following

the standard procedure [5,26,27], we seek the solution in the form

ω(ζ) =N∑

i=0

aiFi(ζ) , (7)

where the function F satisfies the auxiliary equation

(dF

dζ

)2

= b0 + b1F (ζ) + b2F2(ζ) + b3F

3(ζ) + b4F4(ζ) . (8)

Exact solutions of the auxiliary equation (8) can be found in Ref. [27], while the coefficients

ai, bj (j = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) will be determined later. The value of the integer N is found by

balancing the highest nonlinear and derivative terms. This idea in our case leads to N = 1.

Hence,

ω(ζ) = a0 + a1F (ζ). (9)

Inserting Eq.(9) along with Eq.(8) into Eq.(5), and collecting all the coefficients of powers of

F (Fm(ζ), m = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4), setting each coefficient to zero, yields a set of algebraic equations

for the unknowns a0, a1, q, r, bj (j = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) and or s

a0a1b1 + 2pa20 + 2qa30 + 2ra40 + 2sa21b0 = 0 , (10a)

2a0a1b2 + a21b1 + 4pa0a1 + 6qa20a1 + 8ra30a1 + 2sa21b1 = 0 , (10b)

2a21b2 + 3a0a1b3 + 2pa21 + 6qa0a21 + 12ra20a

21 + 2sa21b2 = 0 , (10c)

4a0a1b4 + 3a21b3 + 2qa31 + 8ra0a31 + 2sa21b3 = 0 , (10d)

2a21b4 + ra41 + sa21b4 = 0. (10e)

As explained in [27], the solutions of the auxiliary equation are sensitive to specific values

of the coefficients bj (j = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) and can be regrouped into two families: family (I)

b0 = b1 = 0; family (II) b1 = b3 = 0. We show below that these two families lead to solitary

waves and Jacobi elliptic function solutions of Eq.(1).

5

2.1 Family I solutions: b0 = b1 = 0

We simplify the system of Eqs.(10) by setting for example p = −1 and obtain the following

solutions:

a01 = 0, a11 = a11, b21 =1

s + 1, q1 = −b3(2s+ 3)

2a11, b41 = − a211r

s+ 2, (11a)

a02 =

√

−(s + 2)

r(s + 1), a12 =

b32a02, b22 = b21, q2 =

(2s+ 3)

2a02, b42 =

−b23(s+ 1)

4, (11b)

a03 = −a02, a13 = −a12, b23 = b21, q3 = −q2, b43 = b42. (11c)

Therefore, it is possible to obtain solitary wave solutions if we consider these solutions of

the auxiliary equation (8):

b0 = b1 = 0, b2 > 0, FI,1(ζ) =−b2b3sech

2(√b2/2)ζ)

b23 − b2b4[1− tanh(√

b2/4ζ)]2, (12a)

b0 = b1 = 0, b2 > 0, b23 − b2b4 > 0, FI,2 =2b2sech(

√b2ζ)

√

b23 − 4b2b4 − b3sech(√b2ζ)

. (12b)

Hence, the analytical solution of Eq.(1) is written as

uIm(x, t) = (a0m′ + a1m′FIm(ζ))1

n , (13)

where m = 1, 2 and m′ = 1, 2, 3. Solutions given by Eq.(13) are correct ones if that of the set

(11) are compatible with the requirements of the parameters bj of the set of Eq.(12). These

compatibility conditions impose some restrictions to our solutions Eq.(13). To be precise,

in the set of Eqs.(12), b2 > 0 implies n > 0. This means that our solutions correspond to

only positive values of the power-law nonlinearities (in addition to n 6= 1 obtained above).

When m = 2 in Eq.(13), the condition b23 − 4b2b4 > 0 imposes | b3 |> 2n | a1 |√

−rn+1

;

without loss of generality, we consider that k, V > 0 and taking into account the expression

of r given by Eq.(6c), r must be negative, hence γ and δ have opposite signs. Moreover,

other important information can be extracted from the set of Eqs.(11). On the first hand,

after an examination of Eq.(11a) (zero background solutions a01 = 0), one deduces that

a1, b3, γ, δ, k, and V are free parameters, while α =V (1− δk

2

n)

kand β = −b3kV (n+2)(n+1)δ

2n2a1.

The experimenter has many possibilities to manipulate some physical parameters of the

solution like its width, velocity, amplitude, and to consider different physical situations by

playing with the values and signs of γ, δ, and n, meanwhile altering the signs and values

6

of α, β. For m = 1 in Eq.(13), solitary wave solutions are obtained when δ and γ have

the same signs, a situation consistent with the existence of solitary waves in many physical

system due to a balance between dispersion and nonlinearity [5,6] (and references therein).

Additional specific conditions lead to bright or dark solitary waves. A bright solitary wave

is obtained in the following cases: (i) a1 and b3 with opposite signs and n is an integer, a

sample is presented in Fig. 1(a) for n = 2, m′ = 1; (ii) n = 1/n′, n′ even, an example is

depicted in Fig. 1(b) where n′ = 2, m′ = 1; (iii) a1, b3 with opposite signs and n = 1/n′,

n′ odd, Fig. 1(c) (n′ = 3, m′ = 1) displays such a case. A black solitary wave solution is

obtained if a1 and b3 have opposite signs and n = 1/n′ with n′ odd as can be seen in Fig.

1(d) (n′ = 3, m′ = 1). On the second hand, we observe that Eqs.(11b) and (c) may give

rise to solitary wave solutions on finite backgrounds since a0 is real and does not vanish,

β = ±kV δ(n+2)(n+1)2n2

√

−rn. For m = 1 in Eq.(13), compatible conditions on r and b2 are

identical to the case of Eq.(11a), while for m = 2, the compatible condition b23 − 4b2b4 > 0

is always satisfied (b23 − 4b2b4 = 2b23). We now present solitary waves embedded on finite

backgrounds. To this end, we focus on the solution Eq.(13) with m = 2 and recall that

δ and γ must have opposite signs. Bright solitary waves are obtained if b3 > 0, n = 1/n′

and (i) n′ even (see Fig. 2(a) n′ = 2, m′ = 3), (ii) n′ odd with a0, a1 > 0 (see Fig. 2(b)

n′ = 3, m′ = 3). A dark solitary wave is obtained with the conditions (ii) but a0, a1 < 0 (see

Fig. 2(c) n′ = 3, m′ = 2). For b3 < 0, Eq.(13) represents a dark solitary wave in many cases,

but in some cases where the background is sufficiently small and negative, n′ being an odd

integer, an ’antibright’ solitary wave solution can be obtained (Fig. 2(d) n′ = 3, m′ = 2).

2.2 Family II solutions b0 = b1 = 0

In this part of the work, we show that Eq.(1) also admits Jacobi elliptic function solutions.

The solutions of the set of Eqs.(10) for b1 = b3 = 0 are

b01 =a204(p+ 4a204r)

4a214, b24 = 2a204r −

p

2, q4 =

−4a204r + p

2a04, (14a)

b44 =a214(p− 4a204r)

a204, s =

−2(p− 2a204r)

p− 4a204r. (14b)

7

Taking advantage of four Jacobi elliptic function solutions of the auxiliary Eq.(8):

b01 =1

4, b24 =

k21 − 2

2, (15a)

FII1(ζ) =cn(ζ, k1)

√

1− k21 + dn(ζ, k1)

, FII2(ζ) =cn(ζ, k1)

√

1− k21 − dn(ζ, k1)

, (15b)

FII3(ζ) =sn(ζ, k1)

1 + dn(ζ, k1), FII4(ζ) =

sn(ζ, k1)

1− dn(ζ, k1), (15c)

the Jacobi elliptic function solutions of Eq.(1) are

uIIm(x, t) = (a0m′ + a1m′FIIm(ζ))1

n , (16)

where m = 1, 2, 3, 4, k1 (0 < k1 < 1) denotes the modulus of Jacobi elliptic functions.

As already explained above, correct solutions of Eq.(16) require that the parameters bj

in Eq.(15a) be compatible with their counterparts of the set of Eqs.(14), providing the

expressions of a0, a1, p, k1

a04 =

√

−(n + 1)

3nr, a14 =

1

3

√

−(n + 1)

nr, p =

−4

3n, k1 =

√6

3, (17a)

a05 = a04, a15 = −a14, p, k1 , (17b)

a06 = −a04, a16 = a14, p, k1 , (17c)

a07 = −a04, a17 = −a14, p, k1. (17d)

It is simple to deduce from the set of Eqs.(17) that in Eq.(16)m′ = 4, 5, 6, 7, α = Vk(−4δk2

3n+1),

and β = δk(n+1)V q4n

, while q4 is given in Eq.(14). The parameters n, γ, δ, k, V are free in

solutions Eq.(16). In order to represent some periodic solutions, we suppose that k, V, n > 0,

consequently, γ and δ have opposite signs since r should be negative in the set of Eqs.(17).

Furthermore, the modulus k1 =√6/3 is always constant. We plot in Fig 3 two periodic

solutions of Eq.(1); in panel (a) n = 2, m = 1, m′ = 7, while in panel (b) n = 2, m = 3, m′ =

7.

3. Discussion

In [23] first appeared a bright solitary wave solution of Eq.(1) with all non null coefficients,

the arbitrary power-law nonlinearity n belonging to the interval 0 < n < 2. In Sec. 2, we

have proposed bright, black, dark, and Jacobi elliptic function solutions of Eq.(1) with

8

all non-vanishing coefficients, and show that the power-law nonlinearity n is allowed to

take more positive values than in [23] (n > 0, n 6= 1). Hence, the solutions presented in

Sec. 2 may be used to probe the validity of the model (Eq.(1)) with higher power-law

nonlinearities. Moreover, the two families of solutions also admit negative values of the

power-law nonlinearity n. For example, Jacobi elliptic function solutions given by Eq.(16)

allow negative n in the following cases: (i) −1 < n < 0, r > 0 which means that δ, γ

have the same signs; (ii) n < −1, r < 0 thus δ, γ have opposite signs. We display in Fig.

4(a) the solution expressed by Eq.(16) for n = −3, m = 3, m′ = 4. Besides, the solution

Eq.(13) for negative n holds only for m = 1 (the case m = 2 does not satisfy the condition

b23 − 4b2b4 > 0). Setting p = 1, the solutions of the set of Eqs.(10) with n < 0 become

a01 = 0, a11 = a11, b21 = −1s+1

, q1 = − b3(2s+3)2a11

, b41 = −a211r

s+2, a02 =

√

(s+2)r(s+1)

, a12 = −b32a02, b22 =

b21, q2 = −(2s+3)2a02

, b42 =−b2

3(s+1)

4, a03 = −a02, a13 = −a12, b23 = b21, q3 = −q2, b43 = b42. One

may expect that the solution Eq.(13) gives rise to rather different solitary wave solutions

since the physics of the model has completely changed. Such an expectation is confirmed by

Fig. 4(b) where an antikink profile solution is presented for n = −1/3, m = 1, m′ = 2.

4. Conclusion

This paper obtains bright, dark, antikink, ’antibright’ solitary waves and Jacobi elliptic

function solutions of the generalized BBM equation with dual power-law nonlinearity. The F-

expansion method (along with the auxiliary equation) is used to integrate the BBM equation.

Solutions are constructed for arbitrary power-law nonlinearities that might be positive or

negative, fractional or integer. Many physical parameters may be used to mimic a wide

range of experimental scenarios, whereas the solutions constructed may be used to probe

the accuracy of the model with higher power-law nonlinearities. The issue of stability of

the solutions of the generalized BBM equation needs a thorough treatment that shall be

addressed by means of perturbation techniques and numerical simulations in future works.

9

[1] Hasegawa A, Mima K. Pseudo-three-dimensional turbulence in magnetized nonuniform

plasma. Phys Fluids 1978;21:87-92.

[2] FitzHugh R. Mathematical models of threshold phenomena in the nerve membrane. Bull Math

Biophysics 1955;17:257-278.

[3] Saxton RA. Dynamic instability of the liquid crystal director. Contem Math 1989;100:325-330.

[4] Hunter JK , Saxton R. Dynamics of director fields. SIAM J Appl Math 1991;51:1498-1521.

[5] Belobo Belobo D, Ben-Bolie GH , Kofane TC. Dynamics of kink, antikink, bright, generalized

Jacobi elliptic function solutions of matter-wave condensates with time-dependent two-and

three body interaction. Phys Rev E 2015;91:042902-042915.

[6] Agrawal GP. Nonlinear Fiber Optics. San Diego: Academic; 2006 and references therein.

[7] Zakharov VE. Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid. J

Appl Mech and Tech Phys 1968;9:190-194 .

[8] Toyoda T. Space-time Dependence of the BCS Order Parameter in Non-Equilibrium Systems.

Prog Theor Phys 2005;114:1153-1161 and references therein.

[9] Korteweg DJ, de Vries G. On the change of form of long waves advancing in a rectangular

canal, and on a new type of long stationary waves. Phil Mag 1895;39:422-443. Whitham GB.

Linear and Nonlinear Waves. New York:John Wiley and Sons; 1974. Hirota R. The Direct

Method in Soliton Theory. Cambridge :Cambridge University Press; 2004.

[10] Fokou M, Kofane TC, Mohamadou A, Yomba E. One -and two-soliton solutions to a new KdV

evolution equation with nonlinear and nonlocal terms for the water wave problem. Nonlinear

Dyn 2016;83:2461-2473 and references therein.

[11] Benjamin TB, Bona JL, Mahony JJ. Model equations for long waves in nonlinear dispersive

systems. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A 1972;272:47-78.

[12] Zhang H, Wei GM , Gao YT. On the general form of the Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation

in fluid mechanics. Czech J Phys 2002;52:373-377.

[13] Meiss J , Horton W. Fluctuation spectra of a drift wave soliton gas. Phys Fluids; 1982;25:1838-

1843 and references therein.

[14] Yan C. Regularization long wave equation and inverse scattering transform. J Math Phys

1993;24:2618-2630 and references therein.

10

[15] Lai S, Lv X, Shuai M. The Jacobi elliptic function solutions to a generalized Benjamin-Bona-

Mahony equation. Math Comput Modelling 2009;49:369-378.

[16] Yusufoglu E, Bekir A. The tanh and sine-cosine methods for exact solutions of the MBBM

and Vakhnenko equations. Chaos Solitons and Fractals 2008;38:1126-1133.

[17] An JY, Zhang WG. Exact Periodic Solutions to Generalized BBM Equation and Relevant

Conclusions. Acta Math Appl Sin Engl Ser 2006;22:509-516.

[18] Abbasbandy S, Shirzadi A. The first integral method for modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony

equation. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2010;15:1759-1764.

[19] Chen Y, Li B, Zhang H. Exact solutions for two nonlinear wave equations with nonlinear

terms of any order. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2005;10:133-138.

[20] Layeni OP, Akinola AP. A new hyperbolic auxiliary function method and exact solutions of

the mBBM equation. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2010;15:135-138.

[21] Abdel Rady AS, Osman ES, Khalfallah M. The homogeneous balance method and its applica-

tion to the Benjamin-Bona-Mahony (BBM) equation. Appl Math Comput 2010;217:1385-1390.

[22] Yang XL, Tang JS, Qiao Z. Traveling wave solutions of the generalized BBM equation. Pacific

J Appl Math 2008;1:99-112.

[23] Biswas A. 1-Soliton solution of Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation with dual-power law non-

linearity. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2010;15:2744-2746.

[24] Wazwaz AM. New travelling wave solutions of different physical structures to generalized BBM

equation. Phys Lett A 2006;355:358-362.

[25] Liu X, Tian L, Wu Y. Exact Solutions of the Generalized Benjamin-Bona-Mahony Equation.

Math Prob Eng 2010; ID796398.

[26] Zhou Y, Wang M, Wang Y. Periodic wave solutions to a coupled KdV equations with variable

coefficients. Phys. Lett. A 2003; 308:31-36.

[27] Zhang LH. Traveling wave solutions for the generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation with

higher-order nonlinear terms. Appl Math Comput 2008;208:144-155.

11

FIGURE CAPTIONS

Figure 1

(Color online) Spatiotemporal evolution of solitary wave solutions with positive power-

law nonlinearity given by Eq.(13). (a) n = 2, α = −1, β = 0.1, γ = 2, δ = 2, V = 1, k = 1,

b3 = 0.1, a1 = −1. (b) Same parameters as in panel (a) except n = 1/2 and a1 = 1. (c)

Same parameters as in panel (a) except n = 1/3, β = 0.28. (d) Same parameters as in panel

(b) except n = 1/3, β = −0.28. (a)-(c) bright solitary waves, (d) black solitary wave.

Figure 2

(Color online) (a)-(b) bright, (c) dark solitary wave solutions (13) on finite backgrounds.

(a) n = 1/2, α = 2, δ = −1, β = 5√3, a0 =

√3, a1 = 0.05

√3, m′ = 3. (b) n = 1/3,

β = 2.8√30, a0 =

√30/3, a1 = 0.01666

√30. (c) n = 1/3, β = −0.28

√30, a0 = −

√30/3,

a1 = −0.01666√30, m′ = 2. Other parameters in (a)-(c) are the same as in Fig. 1(a). (d)

a1 = 0.01666√30, other parameters as in (c).

Figure 3

(Color online) Spatiotemporal evolution of Jacobi elliptic function solutions (16). (a)

m = 1, (b) m = 3. Parameters are n = 2, α = 2/3, β = 4√5/5, γ = −1, δ = 1, a0 =

√5/2,

a1 =√15/6, m′ = 7. Other parameters as in Fig 1(a).

Figure 4

(Color online) Solutions with negative power-law nonlinearity. (a) Jacobi elliptic function

solution (16), n = −3, α = 23/27, β = 245

√30, a0 =

√30/9, a1 =

√10/9, m′ = 4, other

parameters as in Fig. 3(b). (b) Antikink solution (13), n = −1/3, α = 4, β = 10√3, δ = −1,

γ = 2, a0 = −√3/3, a1 = 0.0166

√3, m = 2, m′ = 1.

12

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

FIG. 1:

13

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

FIG. 2:

(a) (b)

FIG. 3:

14

(a) (b)

FIG. 4:

15