bechtel power juotc progress · pdf filebechtel will issue draft reports for each technology...
TRANSCRIPT
Bec
htel
Pow
erB
echt
elPo
wer
JUO
TC P
rogr
ess
Rep
ort
June
�20,�2012
Bech
tel C
onfid
entia
l & P
ropr
ieta
ry
Age
nda
Age
nda
Minutes
�S
afet
y M
inut
e5
�P
roje
ct T
eam
5
Pj
PS
15�
Pro
ject
Pro
gres
sS
umm
ary
15
�D
etai
ls o
f Rev
iew
35
�P
relim
inar
y R
esul
ts15
y
�R
epor
t Rev
iew
Pro
cess
10
�Is
sues
5
�Q
uest
ions
30
2Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Safe
ty —
A C
ore
Valu
eSa
fety
—A
Cor
e Va
lue
Bec
htel
Oft
hld
't
id
bild
df
tt
tO
ne o
fthe
wor
ld's
mos
t exp
erie
nced
build
ers
and
safe
st c
ontr
acto
rs
Ove
r 24,
000,
000
hour
s w
orke
d, A
ND
CO
UN
TIN
G, i
n th
e P
Bi
Uit
itht
ltt
iid
t
3Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Pow
erB
usin
ess
Uni
t with
out a
lost
-tim
e ac
cide
nt
Bec
htel
JU
OTC
Pro
ject
Org
aniz
atio
nB
echt
el J
UO
TC P
roje
ct O
rgan
izat
ion
Sta
te W
ater
Boa
rdN
ucle
ar R
evie
w
Com
mitt
eeC
omm
ittee
Rob
ert H
eckl
erC
ompa
ny
Rep
rese
ntat
ive
Bry
an C
unni
ngha
mC
ompa
ny
Rep
rese
ntat
ive
SC
EPG
&E
Jim
Kob
yra
Pro
ject
Man
ager
K
Clin
t Lam
erso
nC
onst
ruct
ion
Dou
g D
ism
ukes
Proj
ect E
ngin
eer
Hin
dira
De
Lim
aP
roje
ct C
ontro
ls
And
rea
Mat
azin
ski
Pro
ject
Adm
inis
trato
r
KK
K
Pete
r Car
rEn
viro
nmen
tal &
Per
mitt
ing
John
Dav
ieG
eote
chni
cal
Nat
asha
Jon
esM
echa
nica
l
Yifa
n Zh
eng
Hyd
raul
ics
&H
ydro
logy
Yifa
n Zh
eng
Hyd
roge
olog
yPh
illip
Kas
sir
Civ
il/S
truct
ural
4Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Dep
th o
f Res
ourc
es —
JUO
TC T
eam
Dep
th o
f Res
ourc
es —
JUO
TC T
eam
Nam
eD
isci
plin
eYe
ars
Expe
rienc
e
Y.Zh
eng
Hyd
raul
ics
&H
ydro
logy
25Y.
Zhen
gH
ydra
ulic
s&
Hyd
rolo
gy25
M. N
agha
shH
ydra
ulic
s &
Hyd
rolo
gy29
K. N
gH
ydra
ulic
s &
Hyd
rolo
gy22
L. Y
oung
Hyd
roge
olog
y33
G. D
ayH
ydro
geol
ogy
27
J. D
avie
Geo
tech
nica
l42
N. J
ones
Mec
hani
cal
8
R.T
awne
yM
echa
nica
l35
T. M
urra
yM
echa
nica
l16
P. C
arr
Env
ironm
enta
l32
PW
anE
nviro
nmen
tal
40+
P.W
anE
nviro
nmen
tal
40+
M. G
olde
nE
nviro
nmen
tal
27
C. L
amer
son
Con
stru
ctio
n40
+
P.K
assi
rC
ivil/
Stru
ctur
al15
5Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
P.K
assi
rC
ivil/
Stru
ctur
al15
Proj
ect P
rogr
ess
Proj
ect P
rogr
ess
INSE
RT
PAG
E 1
OF
SCH
EDU
LE11
X 1
7
6Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Proj
ect P
rogr
ess
(con
t.)Pr
ojec
t Pro
gres
s (c
ont.)
INSE
RT
PAG
E 2
OF
SCH
EDU
LE11
X 1
7
7Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Acc
ompl
ishm
ents
Acc
ompl
ishm
ents
�P
hase
1 p
roje
ct te
am a
ssem
bled
and
func
tioni
ng s
ince
Apr
il 1
�Is
sued
pro
gres
s re
ports
�D
evel
oped
crit
eria
for r
evie
w o
f alte
rnat
ive
tech
nolo
gies
�C
onta
cted
the
maj
ority
of r
egul
ator
y ag
enci
es
�R
ecei
ved
tech
nica
l inp
ut fr
om c
oolin
g to
wer
sup
plie
rs
�C
ompl
eted
"Set
A" c
riter
ia re
view
s
�In
divi
dual
tech
nolo
gy re
port
deve
lopm
ent i
n pr
ogre
ss
8Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Det
ails
of R
evie
wD
etai
ls o
f Rev
iew
Pro
cess
Ove
rvie
w
9Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Det
ails
of R
evie
w (c
ont.)
Det
ails
of R
evie
w (c
ont.)
INSE
RT
FLO
WC
HA
RT
11 X
17
10Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Rev
iew
Crit
eria
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Rev
iew
Crit
eria
�C
riter
ia S
et A
and
Crit
eria
Set
B—
Prio
ritiz
ed a
ppro
ach
for a
ltern
ativ
e te
chno
logy
revi
ews
—Ty
pe A
crit
eria
mos
t lik
ely
to h
ave
a fa
tal f
law
11Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Type
A C
riter
iaD
etai
ls o
f Rev
iew
Type
A C
riter
iayy
�Ex
tern
al a
ppro
val a
nd p
erm
ittin
g (n
onnu
clea
r li
i)
Type
A C
riter
ia
licen
sing
)
—Is
the
tech
nolo
gy p
erm
itabl
e in
the
stat
e of
Cal
iforn
ia,
asse
ssin
g po
ssib
le p
erm
ittin
g co
nstra
ints
and
site
-spe
cific
�Ex
tern
al A
ppro
val a
nd P
erm
ittin
g
�Im
ping
emen
t/
Entra
inm
ent D
esig
n
�O
ffset
ting
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
s
topo
grap
hic
and
area
l con
stra
ints
?—
Is th
e pe
rmitt
ing
proc
ess
for t
he te
chno
logy
suf
ficie
ntly
co
mpl
ex to
effe
ctiv
ely
prec
lude
com
plet
ion?
�Im
ping
emen
t/ent
rain
men
t des
ign
—W
ill th
e im
ping
emen
t/ent
rain
men
t des
ign
satis
fy th
e 31
6b C
alifo
rnia
Onc
e Th
roug
h C
oolin
g P
olic
y P
hase
II ru
les?
—Is
the
thru
slo
t/thr
u sc
reen
vel
ocity
less
than
0.5
fps?
yp
—D
oes
the
scre
en m
esh
size
or s
lot o
peni
ng s
uffic
ient
fine
in re
duci
ng th
e en
train
men
t? D
oes
this
re
duct
ion
mee
t the
Tra
ck II
crit
eria
rega
rdin
g its
com
para
ble
perfo
rman
ce a
gain
st th
e cl
osed
coo
ling
cycl
e op
tion?
—H
as a
fish
col
lect
ion/
retu
rn s
yste
m p
rovi
ded
at th
e tra
velin
g sc
reen
s?
12Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
—A
re th
e lo
catio
ns o
f int
ake
prop
erly
sel
ecte
d, i.
e., a
re th
ey in
less
bio
logi
cally
rich
are
a (o
ut o
f the
lit
tora
l zon
e)?
Has
scr
een
mat
eria
l bee
n pr
oper
ly s
elec
ted
to c
ount
er b
iofo
ulin
gin
a m
arin
e en
viro
nmen
t?
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Type
A C
riter
ia (c
ont.)
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Type
A C
riter
ia (c
ont.)
yy
�O
ffset
ting
envi
ronm
enta
l im
pact
s—
Will
the
cool
ing
syst
em te
chno
logy
cre
ate
addi
tiona
l env
ironm
enta
l or
detri
men
tal i
mpa
cts
cons
ider
ing
cool
ing
tow
er p
lum
e ae
sthe
tics,
drif
t-rel
ated
pa
rticu
late
em
issi
ons
and
salt
depo
sitio
n, la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y, c
oast
al im
pact
, di
tif
ih
bit
td
di
dil
dil
ili
ddi
srup
tion
of m
arin
eha
bita
t,dr
edgi
ng a
nd s
poil
disp
osal
, soi
l ero
sion
and
sedi
men
tatio
n, g
reen
hous
e ga
s em
issi
on in
crea
se, n
oise
impa
cts,
effl
uent
di
scha
rge
impa
cts
(ther
mal
, TD
S),
fresh
wat
er o
r gro
undw
ater
use
?
13Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Type
B C
riter
iaD
etai
ls o
f Rev
iew
Type
B C
riter
iayy
�Fi
rst-o
f-a-k
ind
to s
cale
Type
B C
riter
ia
—H
as th
e te
chno
logy
bee
n us
ed in
exi
stin
g or
pas
t nu
clea
r pow
er p
roje
cts
in th
e U
nite
d S
tate
s an
d ot
her
parts
of t
he w
orld
?
�Fi
rst-o
f-a-K
ind
to S
cale
�O
pera
bilit
y G
ener
al S
ite
Con
ditio
ns
�Se
ismic a
nd T
suna
mi I
ssue
s
�l
p
—H
as th
e te
chno
logy
bee
n us
ed in
any
exi
stin
g or
pas
t pr
ojec
ts in
the
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
and
othe
r par
ts o
f the
w
orld
?
�St
ruct
uras
l
�C
onstru
ctio
n
�M
aint
enan
ce
—Is
the
size
of t
he a
pplic
atio
n ap
plic
able
to th
e tw
o si
tes?
—H
as th
e te
chno
logy
bee
n us
ed o
n si
tes
with
sim
ilar p
hysi
cal c
hara
cter
istic
s t
Di
blC
dS
ON
GS
?to
Dia
blo
Can
yon
and
SO
NG
S?
—Is
it te
chni
cally
just
ifiab
le to
sca
le u
p th
e te
chno
logy
bas
ed o
n kn
own
data
?
—Is
the
tech
nolo
gy c
omm
erci
ally
obt
aina
ble?
14Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Type
B C
riter
ia (c
ont.)
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Type
B C
riter
ia (c
ont.)
yy
�O
pera
bilit
y ge
nera
l site
con
ditio
ns—
Will
the
tech
nolo
gy fi
t int
o th
e ex
istin
g ci
rcul
atin
g w
ater
sys
tem
?—
Will
the
tech
nolo
gy re
sult
in e
xcee
danc
e of
max
imum
allo
wab
le te
mpe
ratu
res,
al
arm
, and
/or t
rip p
oint
s?—
Will
the
impa
cts
to th
e pl
ant o
pera
tions
resu
lt in
una
ccep
tabl
e op
erat
ion
issu
es,
with
resp
ect t
o th
e pu
mps
, val
ves,
con
dens
er, a
nd o
ther
coo
ling
equi
pmen
t?—
Will
the
incr
ease
d de
bris
load
ing
issu
es b
e ac
cept
able
/man
agea
ble
if re
trofit
ted
tofin
em
esh
scre
ens?
tofin
em
esh
scre
ens?
—W
ill th
e in
crea
sed
diffe
rent
ial p
ress
ure
acro
ss s
cree
ns a
ccep
tabl
e if
retro
fitte
d to
fine
mes
h sc
reen
s or
wed
ge w
ire s
cree
ns?
—W
illth
ete
chno
logy
fitin
toth
eex
istin
gfo
otpr
into
fthe
site
?—
Will
the
tech
nolo
gyfit
into
the
exis
ting
foot
prin
toft
hesi
te?
—W
ill th
e te
chno
logy
suc
cess
fully
ope
rate
und
er s
ite e
nviro
nmen
tal c
ondi
tions
?—
Is th
e te
chno
logy
app
licab
le c
onsi
derin
g th
e w
ater
con
ditio
ns a
nd a
vaila
bilit
y at
th
esi
te?
15Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
the
site
?
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Type
B C
riter
ia (c
ont.)
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Type
B C
riter
ia (c
ont.)
yy
�Se
ism
ic a
nd ts
unam
i iss
ues
(eng
inee
erin
g)—
Can
the
tech
nolo
gy b
e pr
oper
ly d
esig
ned
for s
eism
ic re
quire
men
ts?
—Is
the
site
sel
ectio
n fo
r the
tech
nolo
gy s
ubje
ct to
una
ccep
tabl
e ts
unam
i flo
odin
g an
d ot
her e
xter
nal f
lood
ing
even
ts?
�St
tl
�St
ruct
ural
—C
an th
e st
ruct
ure
for t
he te
chno
logy
in q
uest
ion
be p
rope
rly d
esig
ned
agai
nst
criti
cal l
oadi
ngs
impo
sed
on th
em?
—A
reth
ere
unac
cept
able
impa
cts
toth
eex
istin
gst
ruct
ures
?A
reth
ere
unac
cept
able
impa
cts
toth
eex
istin
gst
ruct
ures
?�
Con
stru
ctio
n—
Is th
e te
chno
logy
in q
uest
ion
cons
truct
ible
bas
ed o
n cu
rrent
-day
con
stru
ctio
n m
etho
ds, p
ract
ices
, and
kno
wle
dge?
—W
hat a
re th
e in
stal
latio
n de
tails
nec
essa
ry to
det
erm
ine
that
fabr
icat
ion,
re
quire
d ac
cess
, and
ava
ilabi
lity
of s
pace
for t
he in
stal
latio
n an
d st
agin
g ac
tiviti
es, a
nd a
ssoc
iate
d ph
ysic
al m
odifi
catio
ns c
an b
e ac
com
plis
hed?
16Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Type
B C
riter
ia (c
ont.)
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Type
B C
riter
ia (c
ont.)
yy
�M
aint
enan
ce—
Wha
t are
the
expe
cted
mai
nten
ance
act
iviti
es fo
r the
tech
nolo
gy?
—H
ave
the
mai
nten
ance
act
iviti
es b
een
fully
iden
tifie
d th
at c
ould
cre
ate
a pe
rson
nel h
azar
d, a
nd/o
r unr
ealis
tic (n
onco
mm
erci
ally
via
ble)
ope
ratio
nal
mai
ntai
nabi
lity
burd
en?
Deb
ris h
andl
ing?
—A
re th
ere
corro
sion
or i
ncru
stat
ion
issu
es th
at m
ay re
sult
in u
nrea
listic
ally
fre
quen
t mai
nten
ance
of t
he te
chno
logy
?
17Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Det
ails
of R
evie
w
Det
erm
inat
ion
of S
erio
us F
law
sD
etai
ls o
f Rev
iew
Det
erm
inat
ion
of S
erio
us F
law
s
�Fl
aws
resu
lting
in a
"fe
asib
le"
dete
rmin
atio
n fo
r Pha
se 1
—N
ot m
eetin
g Tr
ack
1 re
quire
men
ts
—M
eetin
g im
ping
emen
t obj
ectiv
es b
ut n
ot e
ntra
inm
ent
—R
egul
ator
y ag
ency
com
men
ts re
gard
ing
any
posi
tive
impr
ovem
ent w
ill be
co
nsid
ered
—P
erm
ittin
g tim
e fra
me(
s)
�Se
rious
flaw
sre
sulti
ngin
a"n
otfe
asib
le"
dete
rmin
atio
n�
Serio
usfla
ws
resu
lting
ina
notf
easi
ble
dete
rmin
atio
n—
Tech
nolo
gy c
anno
t atta
in th
e Tr
ack
2 in
take
vel
ocity
<0.
5 ft/
sec
—La
nd u
se s
igni
fican
tly c
hang
es th
e ar
ea's
topo
grap
hy
Plan
tout
putd
e-ra
ted
requ
iring
addi
tiona
lcap
acity
tom
aint
ain
grid
relia
bilit
y—
Plan
tout
putd
e-ra
ted
requ
iring
addi
tiona
lcap
acity
tom
aint
ain
grid
relia
bilit
y
18Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Rep
ort R
evie
w P
roce
ssR
epor
t Rev
iew
Pro
cess
�B
echt
el w
ill is
sue
draf
t rep
orts
for e
ach
tech
nolo
gy to
eac
h ut
ility
�E
ach
utili
ty w
ill im
med
iate
ly fo
rwar
d ea
ch re
port
to th
e R
evie
w C
omm
ittee
fo
r rev
iew
�Th
eco
mm
ittee
and
utili
ties
will
coor
dina
tean
dpr
ovid
eB
echt
elw
ithon
e�
The
com
mitt
eean
dut
ilitie
sw
illco
ordi
nate
and
prov
ide
Bec
htel
with
one
set o
f com
men
ts u
sing
the
Com
men
t for
m
�Th
e sc
hedu
le is
bas
ed o
n 2
wee
k tu
rnar
ound
.
�B
echt
el w
ill c
oord
inat
e w
ith th
ose
prov
idin
g co
mm
ents
for r
esol
utio
n
�B
echt
el w
ill is
sue
the
revi
sed
repo
rt
20Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Key
Issu
esK
ey Is
sues
�C
lose
d cy
cle
cool
ing
is th
e on
ly m
eans
to c
ompl
y w
ith C
alifo
rnia
OTC
P
olic
y Tr
ack
1 cr
iteria
�C
alifo
rnia
Tra
ck 2
impi
ngem
ent c
riter
ia is
atta
inab
le (<
0.5
ft/s
ec)
Ei
bi
db
hC
lifi
Tk
290
%�
Ent
rain
men
t can
be
impr
oved
but n
ot m
eet t
heC
alifo
rnia
Trac
k2
90%
redu
ctio
n cr
iteria
�K
ey re
gula
tory
age
ncie
s un
able
to p
rovi
de ta
ngib
legu
idan
ce re
gard
ing
yg
yg
gg
gg
abili
ty to
per
mit
or ti
me
fram
es to
obt
ain
perm
its to
scr
een
out a
tech
nolo
gy
22Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary
Ope
n Ite
ms
Ope
n Ite
ms
�P
ract
ical
tim
e fra
mes
for r
egul
ator
y ag
ency
(ies)
per
mitt
ing
�P
ract
ical
ity o
f hyp
erbo
lic n
atur
al d
raft
tow
ers
on C
alifo
rnia
's c
oast
line
�S
ourc
es o
f rec
laim
wat
er fo
r clo
sed
cycl
e co
olin
g sy
stem
s
�Av
aila
bilit
y of
fres
h w
ater
for c
lose
d cy
cle
cool
ing
syst
ems
�In
tern
al B
echt
el re
view
s of
dra
ft re
ports
�Tr
ansi
tion
to P
hase
2
—N
ucle
ar R
evie
w C
omm
ittee
con
curre
nce
to p
roce
ed to
Crit
eria
#10
and
#11
23Be
chte
l Con
fiden
tial &
Pro
prie
tary