bean balls
TRANSCRIPT
STUDY ON BEHAVIOUR OF LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE BY USING BEAN BALL AS LIGHT WEIGHT AGGREGATE
PROJECT GUIDE : SRI RAMA ROA T A B.E,Mtech, ASST PROF. Department of Civil Engineering, AIT Chikmagalur
Conducted by :
Rajath R TAvinash S A
Jeevan P GowdaBhyranayaka M
INTRODUCTION
Concrete: It is a composite construction material made primarily
with aggregate, cement, and water. There are many formulations of concrete, which provide varied properties. LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE:
Lightweight concrete can be defined as a type of concrete which includes an expanding agent in that it increases the volume of the mixture while giving additional quality has lessened the dead weight.
ADVANTAGES OF LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE
•Less weight•Resistance to chemicals•Suitable for Structural and non-structural members•Cost is less•Very workable at low w/c ratio•hardening time of fresh concrete is Less than normal concrete
DISADVANTAGES OF LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE
• Resistance to chemicals: sensitive to most Petroleum products
• Not suitable to be used as prestressed concrete
• Mix consistency: stable up to 30 minutes after mixing
WHY BEAN BALLS ARE USED IN CONCRETE?
•We can create lightweight concrete to the mix•As very light but strong building component light weight concrete has highly insulting properties and create a stone like surface for creative projects. •Adding the bean balls to the concrete to mainly requires knowing the ratio of the mix.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Conventional concrete made with natural
aggregate originating from hard rock has a high density
lies within the range of 2200 to 2260 kg/m3 and
represents a large proportion of the dead load on a
structure. According to BS: 8110: Part 2: 1985classifies
the lightweight concrete is one with a density of 2000
kg/m3 or less.
LABORATORY TESTS
1. Specific gravity of coarse aggregate 2. Specific gravity of fine aggregate3. Specific gravity test for cement4. Water absorption test for fine aggregate 5. Water absorption test for coarse aggregate6. Sieve analysis of fine aggregate7. Sieve analysis of coarse aggregate8. Slump test 9. Compression test10. Tensile test
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
1. The test program is planned in accordance to the objective of the experimentation. The grade of concrete adopted was M20.
2. We molded the different proportion of concrete cubes (150mmX150mmX150mm) and cylinders (dia 100mm) of nominal mix proportion of M20 grade and concrete for design
mix proportion (1:1.62: 2.81).
Department of Civil Engineering, AIT.-2013
CONCRETE
cement
Fineness
Setting Time
Specific Gravity Test
Standard Consistency of Cement Paste
fine
Sieve analysis
Specific gravity of fine aggregate
Bulk density of fine aggregate
Coarse
Sieve analysis
Specific gravity
Water absorption test
Bean Balls
SL.NO MATERIAL PROPERTY VALUES
1. Bean balls Cross- SectionSpecific GravityTensile Strength
circularNilNil
2. Cement Normal ConsistencyInitial Setting timeFinal Setting timeCompressive StrengthTensile StrengthCompressive Strength(10% bean balls)Tensile Strength(10% bean balls)
33%55 min355 min18.46 Mpa(7 days)01.88 Mpa (7 days)
21.17Mpa(7 days)
2.34Mpa(7 days)
3. Coarse Aggregate Specific GravityWater Absorption
2.731%
4. Fine Aggregate Specific GravityBulk density
2.544%
FINAL MIX PROPORTION
Final Ratio = 1:1.62: 2.81
Cement
Water
Fine aggregate
Coarse aggregate
Water-cement ratio
413.33 kg/m3
186 kg/m3
646.95 kg/m3
1152.66 kg/m3
0.45
METHODOLOGYCONCRETE
Specimen Preparation
Weighing of Materials
Mixing of Materials
Mould Preparation
Curing of Specimens
AT temperature 27+ 2 C for 24 hours
7 days immersion
28 days immersion
Method of Testing
Compressive strength = p/BD
Tensile strength = 2P/πdl
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FOR MORTAR CUBES
3 DAYS% Replacement of fine Agg. by bean
balls
Days WeightIngms
Density gm per M3
Failure load (kN) Compressive Strength (MPa)
Control Mix
3 754 2.2x10-3 41.00 8.36 8.073 747 2.17x10-3 40.00 8.10
3 735 2.14x10-3 38.00 7.75
10%
3 695 2.02x10-3 37.00 7.55 8.053 688 2.0x10-3 42.50 8.60
3 683 1.99 x10-3 39.30 8.02
20%
3 684 1.99 x10-3 38.40 7.83 7.833 685 1.99 x10-3 36.50 7.45
3 687 2.00 x10-3 40.30 8.22
30%
3 681 1.98 x10-3 32.70 6.67 7.103 675 1.96 x10-3 37.40 7.63
3 678 1.97 x10-3 34.20 6.98
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FOR MORTAR CUBES
7 DAYS
% replacement of fine agg. by bean balls
Days WtIngms
Density gm per M3
Failure load (kN) Compressive Strength (MPa)
Control Mix
7 783 2.28 x10-3 109.90 22.43 22.467 794 2.31 x10-3 110.70 22.59
7 787 2.29 x10-3 109.60 22.36
10%
7 782 2.27 x10-3 115.30 23.53 22.457 785 2.28 x10-3 104.60 21.34
7 780 2.27 x10-3 110.20 22.49
20%
7 690 2.01 x10-3 85.50 17.44 19.547 680 1.98 x10-3 98.60 20.12
7 696 2.03 x10-3 103.20 21.06
30%
7 771 2.24 x10-3 87.40 17.83 17.677 768 2.24 x10-3 92.80 18.94
7 773 2.25 x10-3 79.60 16.24
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FOR MORTAR CUBES
28 DAYS% replacement of fine
agg. by bean ballsDays Wt
Ingms
Density gm per M3
Failure load (kN) Compressive Strength (MPa)
Control Mix
28 802 2.33x10-3 135.00 27.55 28.29
28 798 2.31 x10-3 138.50 28.26
28 796 2.32 x10-3 142.50 29.08
10%
28 795 2.31 x10-3 133.50 27.24 28.00
28 793 2.31 x10-3 137.60 28.08
28 791 2.30 x10-3 141.10 28.70
20%
28 794 2.31 x10-3 133.20 27.18 26.72
28 792 2.30 x10-3 129.30 26.38
28 793 2.31 x10-3 131.80 26.60
30%
28 789 2.30 x10-3 125.70 25.62 26.30
28 790 2.30 x10-3 130.30 26.60
28 791 2.30 x10-3 132.00 26.90
RESULT AND DISCUSSIONCOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
3 DAYS
.
Percentage of Bean balls
used
Wt In gms
Density gm per M3
Dimension of specimen (mm)
Cross sectional
area (mm)
Crushing load (kN)
Compressive strength for 3th
days(N/mm2)
10 7890
2.33 x 10-3 150 150 150 22500 182.408.10
210 7896
2.33 x 10-3 150 150 150 22500 171.207.60
320 7785
2.31 x 10-3 150 150 150 22500 179.407.97
430 7776
2.304 x 10-3 150 150 150 22500 182.608.11
SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH
7 DAYS
Sl.No.
% of Bean balls used
WtIngms
Density gm per M3
Dimension of specimen (mm)
Cross sectional area
(mm)
Crushing load (kN)
Compressive strength for
7th days( N/mm2 )
10 7970
2.36 x10-3 150 150 150 22500 415.3318.46
210 7910
2.34 x10-3 150 150 150 22500 490.0021.17
320 7820
2.32 x10-3 150 150 150 22500 505.8622.48
430 7710
2.3 x10-3 150 150 150 22500 452.5020.11
SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK
THE PRESENT RESEARCH CAN BE EXTENDED TO
•By adopting the same method for different grades of concrete.•By the use of different admixtures to get improved strength.•By adopting the same method for different lightweight aggregate.•By adopting the same method for different binding materials like Fly ash, Silica fume, Rice Husk ash etc…
CONCLUSION
• It was observed that density of concrete decreased in turn reduces weight of the structure.
• As bean balls are not rigid, the compressive strength / tensile strength reduced by increased percentage of addition of additive.
Department of Civil Engineering, AIT.-2014
REFERENCES
•Concrete admixtures hand book, properties, Science and technology second
edition by V.S. Ramachandra.
•Concrete Technology – M.L. Gambhir
•Concrete Technology – M.S. Shetty
•Concrete Manufactures, Properties and Materials – p. Kumar Mehta And Paula
J.M.Monterio
•Handbook of Ultratech RMC Ltd, Mysore.
•www.civilengineering.com/mixdesignforconcrete.
•www.aboutcivil.com/propertiesofconcrete
•Indian concrete journal Sep.2010.Department of Civil Engineering, AIT.-2014