bbe15 ep5 instar ge power
DESCRIPTION
prestentation break bbantwerp marine offshoreTRANSCRIPT
BreakBulk Antwerp 2015 Case-Study Wloclawek
Poland Combine Cycle Power Plant
INSTAR Projects, Germany:
Maciej Malinowski, Project ManagerHendrik Wagner, Director EngineeringGE Power Generation Products Customer Projects:
Odile Déhu, Logistics Project Manager
GE Picture / Shaftline overview / April 1st 2015
Overview
Content
[1] Overview
[2] Challenges
[3] Preparation
[4] Solution
[5] Conclusion
Slide 2Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
3
7
11
26
37
OverviewSlide 3
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Wloclawek
Project Location
Wloclawek
Gdansk
OverviewSlide 4
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
PKN Orlen Poland End Customer
GE / SNC Lavalin / Turnkey Project Consortium
INSTAR HL Project Freight Forwarder
Pol-Mare Port Operations
MTD Heavy Transports
Trend L/S/D and HL Rigging
Lastro Heavy Lift Service Provider
Parties Involved
OverviewSlide 5
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Cargo Qty Origin Loading PortLength
[cm]
Width
[cm]
Height
[cm]
Weight
[Mg]
Gas Turbine 1 France Antwerp 1095 498 504 302
Generator 1 USA Albany 940 544 411 276
HRSG-Module (a) 6 South Korea Masan 2750 460 340 198
HRSG-Module (b) 9 Vietnam Haiphong 2750 460 270 146
Steam Drum 1 South Korea Masan 1760 280 310 120
Steam Turbine 1 USA Albany 965 307 376 102
Total GE Project Volume: 26’000 m³ / 7’000 tons
OverviewSlide 6
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
December 2012Q2 2015
First Fire
December 2015, COD
Site Preparation (Przygotowanie Miejsca)
Civil Works(Prace Lądowe)
Q1-Q2 2014Major Equipment
Delivery to Site
Mechanical
Electrical Installations(Prace Elektro-mechaniczne)
Commisioning
(Przekazywanie do eksploatacji)
Project schedule, Key dates
June 6, 2014 Deadline for site delivery of major heavy lifts
OverviewSlide 7
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Vistula river (Wisla, Weichsel), Characteristics
Wloclawek
• Unregulated river
• Rapidly fluctuating waterlevel
• Difficult to predict
• Overhead clearance limited by several bridges
• Width limited by river locks
OverviewSlide 8
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Huge Amount of Cargo to be Transported Within a Tight Schedule
• No road and rail options for 33 heavy lifts
• Only option:Vistula river
• Limited number ofsuitable pontoons and push boats
• Short and unpredictable navigation time window
OverviewSlide 9
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Road Infrastructure from pier to site
Main route
ANWIL
OverviewSlide 10
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
24 tons of total capacity
Either: Replacement 650K EUR
Or: fly-over for 10 months
Bridge on the route from ramp to site
OverviewSlide 11
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Port of Import: Gdansk
Westerplatte (Pier)
- HL cargo
Szczecinskie Pier
- General cargo
- OOG cargo
Szczecinskie Pier
Westerplatte
OverviewSlide 12
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Quay Selection Criteria:
• Suitable for Break Bulk vessels
• Starting point for OOG road transports
• Starting point for HL road transports
• Direct access to the Vistula river to avoid the Gdansk Bay passage
• Sufficient space for storage and maneuvers with large pieces
Selection of Potentially Best Pier, depending on Cargo Type
OverviewSlide 13
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Routing from Port into Vistula River
Two possible routings:
1 – via Gdansk Bay2 – via Channel
Team decision: Enter Vistula river via channel to avoid Gdansk Bay and to reduce risks of pontoon navigation on sea
OverviewSlide 14
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Vistula River = Unpredictable Inland Navigation Periods
• Usual Navigation Periods: - April…June- October…November
• 2012 and 2013 lowest water levels since 200 years
• No rain or snow fall in autumn/winter 2013
Max 5m
Min 3m
Vistula river, Water level in Torun 2003 to 2012
OverviewSlide 15
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Typical Cycle for Inland Transport of HL on Vistula river
OverviewSlide 16
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
First Draft of Project Transport Schedule / Oct. 2013
Even under perfect navigation conditions, with 4 pontoons last HRSG modulewould be 3 weeks to late.
Main Challenge: Optimize the inland waterway schedule
54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121
6th LOT
6th LOT2 st LOT 2nd LOT 4th LOT
3rd LOT 5th LOT 7th LOT
2 st LOT 2nd LOT 4th LOT 8th LOT
5th LOT 7th LOT3rd LOT
April 15, 2014Expected official startof river nav. period
June 6, 2014Deadline
OverviewSlide 17
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Opt.16 Pontoons for GT, GEN and HRSG
> Still sensitive to unfavourableclimatic conditions
Optimization of Project Transport Schedule / Dec. 2013
April 15, 2014Expected official startof river nav. period
June 6, 2014Deadline
OverviewSlide 18
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
In Option 1 – Discharging Pier would become Bottleneck
OverviewSlide 19
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Opt.16 Pontoons for GT, GEN and HRSG
> Still sensitive to unfavourableclimatic conditions
Opt.24 Pontoons for GT, GEN and HRSGPLUS 220 km Road Transports
> shortest possible cycle times
Optimization of Project Transport Schedule / Dec. 2013
April 15, 2014Expected official startof river nav. period
June 6, 2014Deadline
OverviewSlide 20
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
HRSG Modules 200 tons: Pontoon Barging, Roll-off
OverviewSlide 21
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
HRSG Modules 150 tons: Road Transport
OverviewSlide 22
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Main route
Bridge Bypass over Chemical Plant
OverviewSlide 23
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Site Transport and Storage Scenarios of HRSG Modules
OverviewSlide 24
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Heaviest Item: Gas Turbine, 302 tons
OverviewSlide 25
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Get ready to catch the river transport window
OverviewSlide 26
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Arrival and Start of River Transport of HL items in Gdansk
OverviewSlide 27
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
GT and GEN - Routing from Port into Vistula river
Measurement of bridges overhead clearance:
On channel, passage of cargo over 4.20 m height not possible
Decision:- GEN (4.11m) via Channel- GT (5.05m) via Bay
OverviewSlide 28
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
April 2 to April 5:GT and Geno
from Gdansk to Korzeniewo
GT + GEN Pontoons Transfer from Gdansk to Wloclawek
April 6 to May 1: low water level
forced a stop
Max 5m
Min 3m
OverviewSlide 29
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Parking Position because of Low Water Level
OverviewSlide 30
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Sounding of the River Bed
OverviewSlide 31
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
May 2 to May 6:GEN and Geno
from Korzeniewo to Wloclawek
Max 5m
Min 3m
April 6 to May 1: low water level
forced a stop
April 2 to April 5:GT and Geno
from Gdansk to Korzeniewo
GT + GEN Pontoons from Gdansk to Wloclawek
OverviewSlide 32
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Discharging of GT and GEN in Wloclawek
OverviewSlide 33
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
Heaviest Item: Gas Turbine, 302 tons
OverviewSlide 34
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
HRSG Modules and Steam Drum, Port Storage Gdansk
OverviewSlide 35
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
HRSG Modules over 150 tons: Pontoon Barging, Roll-off
OverviewSlide 36
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
• Team building and cooperative mindset:• Team Building starting from the early project stage• Empower every team member and gain trust
• Concentrate on factors the Team can influence:• Be prepared for favorable weather conditions • Consider as many scenarios as needed
• Jump out of the box to meet project targets:• Shift some HRSG modules strategy transfer from river to road
• Communication plan:• Information direct from the source• To all the Project Team Members
Collaborative thinking
OverviewSlide 37
Challenges Preparation Solution Conclusion
• Engineering INSTAR capabilities for Heavy Lift transport:• Detailed and documented itinerary surveys• Drawings and Method of statements• ?
• Polish Project Manager:• Knowledge and experience of the:
• Polish authorities• Subcontractors• Local actors including customer
- > FILM
Technical and local expertise