barber_gsa_2014_vacuum saturation v3
TRANSCRIPT
Applying Vacuum Saturation to Study The Pore Structure of Tight Shales
Troy J. Barber and Q.H. Hu
2014 GSA Annual MeetingVancouver, British ColumbiaOctober 21, 2014
Outline
I. Tight gas production decline and fracture-
matrix interaction
II. Pore topology and macro scale fluid
migration
III. Vacuum saturation: how we use it
IV. Mapping edge-accessible pores
V. Preliminary Results
VI. Summary and Looking forward
Recovery factor of 5‒10% for tight oil (Hoffman, 2012; SPE 154329)
Problem: Steep production decline in tight shale gas
Chong et al., 2010, SPE-133874
Refrac rebound ???Slow matrix
diffusion
Pore structure: Geometry and Topology
LA ICP-MS
Multiple approaches to pore characterization
Nitrogen sorption
Imbibition Tests
Traced vacuum saturation
• Fluid (API brine; n-decane) and tracer imbibition tests
• Edge-accessible porosity after traced vacuum saturation
• Liquid and gas diffusion tests
• Mercury intrusion porosimetry and hysteresis
• N2 adsorption isotherm and hysteresis
• Ar ion milling, FE-SEM, and TEM
• 2-D/3-D tracer mapping using Laser Ablation-ICP-MS
• Small-Angle Neutron Scattering (LANL; ORNL; NIST)
Today’s talk will focus on these two methods
T
What is traced vacuum saturation?
FLUID (water, brine, n-decane)
AIR
AIRAIR
CO2
TO VACUUM
CO2P
T
T T
T T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
CO2 highly soluble in water
Several cycles over 6-12hr removes air
After ~1 hr, vacuum in connected space =(0.01/743)Torr = 99.999%
Evacuation Duration:12-24 hr
API Brine - water wettingReO4- (nonsorbing)Cs+, Co2+, Ce+,Eu3+
n-decane – oil wettingRe (nonsorbing)I-
Different fluids to see effect of wettability. Sorbing and nonsorbing tracers.
After saturation, apply CO2 pressure to liquid surface12-24 hr. T
TT
T
T
T
• Large volumes• Prone to leaks,
99.91% vacuum• No flushing or
positive pressure capability
Our previous apparatus
Our current apparatus
Smaller chamber = less waste
99.99% vacuum
Mechanically sealed, allowing CO2 flushing/positive pressure
Sample holder for easy organization
Solid
Liquid
Granite
Laser Ablation-ICP-MS for micro scale profiling
100 µm hole diameter
Rb (intrinsic)
ReO4- (non-sorbing)
224 µm
2 µm
12 µm
54 µm
100 µm spot size
2 mm
Saturating Surface
-45
-35
-25
-15
-5
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Verti
cal h
eight
(µm)
Horizontal distance (µm)
1 pulse5 pulses10 pulses25 pulses50 pulses
3D Tracer Distribution
2D Interior cross section
9.5 mm
Saturation Saturation
Epoxied Sides
100um spot size500um spacing
~ 2 order of magnitude drop within 500um from sample edge.
Summary and Looking Forward• Steep 1st year decline and low
overall hydrocarbon production observed in hydraulically-fractured shales.
• Investigating pore structure in natural rock requires several complimentary approaches.
• Traced vacuum saturation paired with LA-ICP-MS is effective at characterizing the edge-accessible pores.
• Results indicate low pore connectivity in shales, which reduces gas diffusion from matrix to stimulated fractured network – driving steep production decline
What’s next?
• Elevated pressure saturation• Comparing samples of different
mineralogy, maturation, TOC, bedding orientation, wettability, etc.
• SANS/USANSo Inaccessible poreso In-situ P-T conditionso Pore structure and flow
dynamics
AcknowledgementsQ.H. “Max” HuGSA On to the Future Program
ThankYou