ba212: class 2 an overview of the natural gas and electricity industries
DESCRIPTION
BA212: Class 2 An Overview of the Natural Gas and Electricity Industries. 2004 US CO 2 Emissions by Sector. Source: EIA, http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo06/emission.html. The Natural Gas Industry. Untying the Regulatory Knot. Gas: The “clean” fossil fuel. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
BA212: Class 2
An Overview of the Natural Gas and Electricity Industries
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 2
2004 US CO2 Emissions by Sector
Transportation
Electricity Generation
Household NG & Oil
Commercial NG & Oil
Industrial Coal
Industrial NG & Oil
Source: EIA, http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo06/emission.html
The Natural Gas Industry
Untying the Regulatory Knot
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 4
Gas: The “clean” fossil fuel
Emissions Characteristics of Major Fossil Fuels
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
NaturalGas
Oil Coal
Fuel/Pollutant
Emissions
Carbon Dioxide
Nitrogen Oxides
Sulfur Dioxide
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 5
The Natural Gas Industry:traditional structure
Production
– Discovery, extraction, gathering, processing
Transmission
– pipelines (inter-state and intra-state)
– Growing role of Liquified Natural Gas (LNG)
Distribution (LDCs)
– From the pipeline to the end-user
Characterized by functional separation and multi-layered regulation
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 6
Natural Gas Usage (2005)Natural Gas Consumption 2005
Electricity Generation26%
Industrial Usage30%
Residential22%
Oil & Gas Operations5%
Pipeline3%
Commercial 14%
Vehicle fuel0%
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 7
Natural Monopoly and Regulation
Distribution (and retail sales)
– regulated by states
– usually ‘cost of service’ regulation
Interstate Pipelines (‘sales for resale’)
– regulated by the federal government (FPC and then FERC) since 1938.
Production (‘first sales’)
– transactions with inter-state pipelines increasingly regulated by FPC from 1938 to 1978. Rapidly deregulated after 1978
– transactions with intra-state pipelines and LDCs sometimes regulated by States.
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 8
Unnatural Movements ofNatural Gas Prices
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 9
The Unraveling of Regulation
Supply Shortages (NGPA 1978)
Common Carriage (FERC 436 and 636)
What else did pipelines do?– ‘marketing’ (sales and re-sales)– storage– risk management
Competitive marketing = competitive commodity market– no need to regulate commodity prices!
Regulation of distribution is a mixed bag– Retail choice in some states– Core/non-core– Hedging concerns
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 10
Transition pains
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 11
US Natural Gas Production
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 12
The Future of Natural Gas
Still an attractive alternative to coal from an environmental perspective
Historically different from oil in important ways
– Continental markets served by pipelines• North American market fairly independent of other regions
– Fragmented production - almost no producer market power
– Competition issues focused on transportation/pipelines
With Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) the market is becoming global
– Lots of producer market power in the rest of the world
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 13
Unnatural Movements ofNatural Gas Prices
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 14
Natural Gas Production
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 15
Natural Gas Reserves
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 16
World Natural Gas Trade
The Electricity Industry
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 18
The Electricity Industry: Traditional Structure
Production
– Generation – the process of converting, rather than extracting, inputs.
Transmission
– High voltage wires.
Distribution
– From high voltage to your living room.
Retailing
– Billing & customer service.
The industry has predominantly been vertically integrated across all four sectors.
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 19
Key Economic Characteristics of the Industry (1)
Costs vary by resource.
Total Cost
Q
Gas (CT)
Coal
Nuclear
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 20
Key Economic Characteristics of the Industry (2)
Electricity, for the
most part, cannot
be stored.
End-use demand
is very inelastic.
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 21
Key Economic Characteristics of the Industry (3)
Physical characteristics of the transmission grid create externalities
across grid “users.”
– The transmission grid has limited capacity, especially at
times of peak demand.
– For example, when transmission capacity is limited, not all
the generators on the Delta can supply power to San
Francisco.
– The more one plant on the Delta produces, the less other
plants can.
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 22
Vertical Integration and Regulation
Originally, producers needed to distribute to get their product sold
– Production and distribution linked from the beginning.
Coordination issues across sectors (e.g. externalities on the transmission grid) made vertical integration attractive.
Economies of scale
– Prevalent in every sector early on.
– Still present on the “wires” side (transmission & distribution).
With vertical integration, if one sector is a natural monopoly, the whole industry must be regulated.
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 23
Market Organization
Outside US
– Nationalized, vertically integrated electric company
United States (pre-1998)
– Investor owned electric company
– Vertically integrated
– Regulated by state utility commissions
– Geographically small (Balkanized network)
The Exceptions (US)
– Federal power: the ultimate exercise in economies of scale
– Municipal utilities: going it ‘alone’
– Wholesale power markets
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 24
What happened?
The golden years (1930-1970)
– Economies of scale keep driving costs down as demand keeps growing.
Everything goes wrong (the 70’s)
– fuel price shocks: demand stops growing
– nuclear power and regulatory risk
Steps towards deregulation (part II, the 80’s)
– the 70’s continued
– PURPA
– renewable generation
– ‘least-cost’ planning
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 25
Average Retail Price of Electricity, 1960-2005
Source: EIA, http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/pages/sec8_38.pdf.
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 26
Different approaches give different results
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 27
2003 Average Residential Prices
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 28
Electricity Prices around the World
Residential Industrial
USA 9.0 5.3
France 14.1 5.0
Germany 17.6 6.5
United Kingdom 13.8 6.7
Japan 19.6 12.7
Canada 6.2 4.9
Australia 6.2 3.6
Norway 6.9 4.3
Russia N/A 2.9
Italy 19.1 16.2
Switzerland 14.3 8.5
Average Price of Electricity (2003/04 US cents/ kWh)
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 29
Where are we now?
International wave of privatization
– No consensus on new model
US Energy Policy Act of 1992
– toward unregulated generation sales
– ‘unbundling’ of transmission
– what was in the bundle?
“Radical” restructuring
– beyond unbundling to ‘separation’
– the ‘Independent System Operator’ (ISO)
– California, PJM, New England, New York, Texas
– Chile, UK, Norway, Australia, New Zealand, Spain, Netherlands
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 30
Electricity and the Environment
In the US in 2004, the electricity industry accounted for:
– 39% of CO2 emissions
– 69% of SO2 emissions
– 22% of NOx emissions
The industry is also a major water user.
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 31
Location & Size of US Power Plants, 2004
Source: NRDC, http://www.nrdc.org/air/pollution/benchmarking/2004/benchmark2004.pdf.
Professors Borenstein & Bushnell BA212 - Spring 2008 Page 32
Carbon Emissions at US Power Plants, 2002