b1 versus b2
TRANSCRIPT
Välkomna!Seminarium
för Teknisk Ledning 2011
5-6/5 Arlanda
2010-09-22
2010-09-22
Tid Ämne Föreläsare
Dag 1 2011-05-05
0900-0930 Inregistrering, kaffe
0930-0945 VälkomnaPraktiska sakerInledning
GL
0945-1015 Året som gått, återkoppling från luftvärdighetsenheten 2010
RV, LH, MJ
1015-1045 Utfall från Verksamhetskontroller Del-M subpart G, Del-145 och ACAM
RV, LH
1045-1100 Tankepaus
1100-1115 Utfall från Verksamhetskontroller forts RV, LH
1115-1200 Ankomstkontroller LA, PW
1200-1300 Lunch
1300-1315 Linjestation när? Vad gäller LA
1315-1400 Del-66. Auktorisationer i en Del-145 organisation, vad ska man tänka på?B1 kontra B2 vem får göra vad?
JS
1400-1415 Tankepaus
1415-1445 Händelserapportering JB, MB
1445-1530 Säkerhetskultur. Ledningens engagemang
NS
1530-1600 Kaffe med diskussionsuppgift med tema säkerhetskultur
1600-1645 Dialog diskussionsuppgift Alla
1645-1715 Avslutning, Transportsstyrelsens roll, hur ser vi på ledningens engagemang
IC
1900- Middag
Agenda för seminarium för Teknisk Ledning 5-6 maj, 2011, Arlanda
2010-09-22
Tid Ämne Vem
Dag 2 2011-05-06
0830-0900 Återkoppling från dag 1, obesvarade frågor JS
0900-0930 SIB, AD:s, ECI MJ
0930-1000 SMS, SSP hos myndighet och organisationer MM
1000-1030 Kaffe
1030-1100 Anmärkningar vid luftvärdighetsgranskning JB
1100-1115 Enhetlig tillämpning. Kompetenskrav CAMO-personal och revisorer.
JB
1115-1130 Extern Auditör 145 LA
1130-1200 Avgifter GL
1200-1300 Lunch
1300-1315 Importer MJ
1315-1330 Tillämpning installation av utrustning MJ
1330-1345 Tankepaus
1345-1400 AMC 2010/006 Residue JB
1400-1415 Flexibility provisions 14.4 o 14.6Standard i EU praktiska ex AMC/AMP
LH, RV
1415-1430 NPA / CRD hur påverkar vi/ni? GL
1430-1500 Kaffe, Sista chansen Alla
Agenda för seminarium för Teknisk Ledning 5-6 maj, 2011, Arlanda
Cert o sånt ju…
2010-09-22
TC seminarium 2011
• Auktorisation i en Del-145• B1 versus B2, vem gör vad?
2010-09-22
Jukka Salo Flygteknisk Inspektör
”Cert o sånt ju…”
• Team 66/147
Tobias FridarveStefan JohnssonGun KarlssonJukka Salo
2010-09-22
• Godkända Del-147 skolor med svenskt tillstånd.
• Hittar du här….
2010-09-22
”Cert o sånt ju…”
Kolla in vår nya hemsida!
Auktorisation av en 145 org. Vad gäller?
66.A.20 (b) The holder of an aircraft maintenance licence may not exercise certification privileges unless:
• 1. in compliance with the applicable requirements of Part-M and/or Part-145.
• 2. in the preceding two-year period he/she has, either had six months of maintenance experience in accordance with the privileges granted by the aircraft maintenance licence or, met the provision for the issue of the appropriate privileges.
2010-09-22
145.A.30
• (b) Excepting those cases listed in 145.A.30(j) the organisation may only issue a certification authorisation to certifying staff in relation to the basic categories or subcategories and any type rating listed on the aircraft maintenance licence as required by Annex III (Part-66), subject to the licence remaining valid throughout the validity period of the authorisation and the certifying staff remaining in compliance with this Annex III (Part-66).
2010-09-22
145.A.30
• (c) The organisation shall ensure that all certifying staff and category B1 and B2 support staff are involved in at least six months of actual relevant aircraft or component maintenance experience in any consecutive two year period.
2010-09-22
Auktorisation av en 145 org. Vad gäller?
Att tänka på…
2010-09-22
Type rating6/24 Praktik
Utländskt cert
2010-09-22
6/24 praktik
2010-09-22
6/24 praktik66.A.20
• (b) The holder of an aircraft maintenancelicence may not exercise certificationprivileges unless:
• 2. in the preceding two-year period he/shehas, had six months of maintenanceexperience in accordance with the privileges granted by the aircraftmaintenance licence
2010-09-22
Decision No 2003/19/RM / AMC 66.A.20 (b) 2 Privileges
Experience shall be:
• On aircraft structure, powerplant and systems
• Appropriate to the category or subcategory• Relevant to the type or group rating held.
Supported by• documentary evidence.
.
2010-09-22
Decision No 2003/19/RM / AMC 66.A.20 (b) 2 Privileges
1. Duration:
• - 6 months continuous employment withinthe same organisation; or
• - 6 months split up into different blocks, employed within the same or in different organisations.
• The 6 months period can be replaced by 100 days of maintenance experience
2010-09-22
Decision No 2003/19/RM / AMC 66.A.20 (b) 2 Privileges
• When certifying staff maintains and releases aircraft in accordance with M.A.801(b)2, in certaincircumstances this number of days may even be reduced by 50% whenagreed in advance by the competent authority.
• owner of an aircraft
• aircraft operated for low utilization,
• the working days should be spread over the intended 6 months period.
2010-09-22
Decision No 2003/19/RM / AMC 66.A.20 (b) 2 Privileges
• A maximum of 20% of the experienceduration required may be replaced by the following
• - Aircraft maintenance related training as an instructor/assessor or as a student;
• - Maintenance technical support/engineering;
• - Maintenance management/planning.
2010-09-22År 1 År 2
100 dagar
- 50 % M.A.801(b)250 dagar agreed in advance by the competent authority
Decision No 2003/19/RM / AMC 66.A.20 (b) 2 Privileges
- 20 % i annan tjänst enl. AMC
6 mån ett block
6 mån flera block
2010-09-22
Decision No 2003/19/RM / AMC 66.A.20 (b) 2 Privileges
2. Nature of the experience:
• - Servicing; • - Inspection; • - Operational and functional testing; • - Trouble-shooting; • - Repairing; • - Modifying; • - Changing component; • - Supervising these activities; • - Releasing aircraft to service.
2010-09-22
Decision No 2003/19/RM / AMC 66.A.20 (b) 2 Privileges
• For category A certifying staff, the experience should includeexercising the privileges,
• For category B1 and B2, for every aircraft included in the authorization the experience should be on that particularaircraft or on a similar aircraft within the same licencesubcategory.
• a) Propulsion systems• b) Flight control systems• c) Avionic systems• d) Structure
• For category C, the experience should cover at least one of the aircraft types endorsed on the authorization.
2010-09-22
Decision No 2003/19/RM / AMC 66.A.20 (b) 2 Privileges
• As an alternative to the above:
- In the case of B1 licence endorsed with group ratings
• least one aircraft type per group and per aircraftstructure (metal, composite, wood).
- In the case of a B2
• at least one aircraft type per group.
2010-09-22
Decision No 2003/19/RM / AMC 66.A.20 (b) 2 Privileges
Documented in an
• individual log book or in any other recording system (whichmay be an automated one) containing the following data:
– a) Date; – b) Aircraft type; – c) Aircraft identification i.e. registration; – d) ATA chapter (optional); – e) Operation performed i.e. 100 FH check, MLG wheel
change, engine oil check and complement, SB embodiment, trouble shooting, structural repair, STC embodiment…;
– f) Type of maintenance i.e. base, line; – g) Type of activity i.e. perform, supervise, release; – h) Category used A, B1, B2 or C.
2010-09-22
Decision No 2003/19/RM / AMC 66.A.20 (b) 2 Privileges
• Remark: as per article 5 of regulation 2042/2003, this experience requirement does not apply to:
• - Certifying staff issuing a certificate of release of aircraft as per M.A.607(b);
• - Pilot-owner certifying tasks according to M.A.803; and
• - Certifying staff according to 145.A30(j) and Appendix IV of Part-145.
2010-09-22
Decision No 2003/19/RM / AMC 66.A.20 (b) 2 Privileges
• AMC 66.B.120 • Ensuring the continued validity of the certification
privileges is a matter for the approved Part-145 / Subpart-F maintenance organization or the certifying staff in accordance with M.A.801(b)2 .NOT the Authority
• The competent authority may, when periodicallyreviewing the organizations in accordance with 145.B.30 or M.B.604, or during on the spot checks, request the licence holder for documentaryevidence of compliance with 66.A.20(b) whenexercising certification privileges.
Att tänka på…
2010-09-22
Type rating6/24 Praktik
Utländskt cert
• Utländska cert kan innehålla limiteringar som kan begränsa auktorisationen, tex CAA UK cert.
• Kontrollera noggrant ev. limiteringar
2010-09-22
Limitations
2010-09-22
Ett exempel…
LIMITATIONS ON A CONVERTED LICENCE• Limitation codes may be applied singly or in
combination to basic categories and type ratings to reflect the scope of protected rights transferred to a Part-66 licence. The limitation codes and theirtranslation which is printed on the reverse of the licence are listed below:
2010-09-22
• 1. Excluding electrical power generation & distribution systems.
• 2. Excluding instrument systems, INS/IRS and Flight Directors systems.
• 3. Excluding autopilot systems on aeroplanes.• 4. Excluding autopilot systems on helicopters.• 5. Excluding automatic landing and auto throttle
systems on aeroplanes.• 6. Excluding radio communication/navigation and radar
systems.
2010-09-22
• 7. Excluding radio radar systems.• 8. Reserved.• 9. Excluding avionic LRUs.• 10. Excluding airframe.• 11. Excluding engine.• 12. Excluding all pressurised aeroplanes.• 13. Reserved.• 14. Excluding pressurised aeroplanes above 5700 Kg
MTOM.
2010-09-22
• 15. Excluding supercharged piston engines in aeroplanes.
• 16. Excluding navigational and electronic instrument systems, FDR, GPWS and vibration monitoringsystems.
• 17. Excluding radio-coupled autopilot systems in aeroplanes.
• 18. Excluding radio-coupled autopilot systems in helicopters.
2010-09-22
• 19. Excluding all tasks with the exception of Compass Compensation and adjustment only.
• 20. Excluding propeller-turbine engines.• 21. Excluding all tasks with the exception of minor
scheduled line maintenance up to and including Daily Inspections.
• 22. Excluding all tasks with the exception of CabinMaintenance tasks.
• 23. Excluding all tasks with the exception of DC electrical components in mechanical systems.
2010-09-22
• 24. Excluding all systems with the exception of LRUswithin In-flight Entertainment Systems.
• 25. Excluding electrical power generation and distribution systems on aircraft above 5700 kg MTOW.
• 26. Excluding Avionic LRU replacement and BITE checks on aircraft above 5700 Kg MTOM.
• 27. Excluding Antenna and Antenna Feeder Systems relating to radio and radar systems.
• 28. Excluding maintenance tasks on WoodenStructures and Fabric Coverings.
2010-09-22
Att tänka på…
2010-09-22
Type rating6/24 Praktik
Utländskt cert
ED Decision 2010/011/R
2010-09-22
Type training
2010-09-22
Content of the TypeRating training
B767-200 147.A.300
Type mentioned on the CofR
B767-200 147.A.145
Type Rating endorsement
B767-200/300/400ER (GE CF6)
66.A.45/66.B.115
CertificationAuthorisation
B767-200 145.A.35
Type training• There is no need to have all the variants covered in a type
rating course, even though the type rating endorsement on the licence (column 3 in the appendix of ED Decision 2010/011/R contains many variants.
• Further, a Part-147 MTO cannot be obliged to cover all the models listed in column 2 in its type rating training course.
• What is important is that training contents, Certificate of Recognition and Certification Authorisation are aligned.
• If, at a later stage, the variant has to be added to the Certification Authorisation it is responsibility of the Part-145 Organisation to cover the differences between the two models before the scope of the Certification Authorisation is extended.
2010-09-22
Auktorisation av en B1 för A Tasks
• En innehavare av kategori B1 har alltid underkategori A.• B1.1 – A1
B1.2 – A2B1.3 – A3B1.4 – A4
• En B1.1 med vissa typer i sitt cert kan alltid auktoriseras för A-tasks för andra typer efter genomgången utb/examenligt godkänd MOE procedur.
• OBS – i en 145 organisation – line maintenance
2010-09-22
Auktorisation av en B1 för A Tasks
2010-09-22
Kat B1.1Kat A1
Typer med B1/B2
Kan auktoriseras för A 1tasks på tex. A320, men Ej en EC120.
Slutligen…
Det är alltid upp till Del-145 organisationen att
auktorisera (efter en assessment) sin personal ”hur mycket eller hur lite”
som är relevant kontra certifikatet.
2010-09-22
Är vi i mål…?
2010-09-22
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
Ett arbete pågår via NPA 2007-07 för att tydliggöra vad som menas med ”simple self-test facility” samt i övrigt förtydliga skillnaden mellan B1 och B2.
Vad som gäller idag är följande:
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
I fråga om grundutbildning för B1/B2 är det Appendix I i Del-66 som styr. Vad det gäller tex:6.11 Electrical Cables and Connectors•Cable types, construction and characteristics;•High tension and co-axial cables;•Crimping;•Connector types, pins, plugs, sockets, insulators, current•and voltage rating, coupling, identification codes.I denna submodul har B1 och B2 samma nivå dvs. nivå 2. Detsamma gäller för…
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
7.7 Electrical Cables and Connectors•Continuity, insulation and bonding techniques and testing;•Use of crimp tools: hand and hydraulic operated;•Testing of crimp joints;•Connector pin removal and insertion;•Co-axial cables: testing and installation precautions;•Wiring protection techniques: Cable looming and loomsupport, cable clamps, protective sleeving techniquesincluding heat shrink wrapping, shielding.
…där både B1 och B2 har nivå 3,samt:
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
7.15 Welding, Brazing, Soldering and Bonding•Soldering methods; inspection of soldered joints.
där båda har nivå 2.Däremot i Modul:
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
7.4 Avionic General Test Equipment •Operation, function and use of avionic general test equipment.
Här har B2 högre nivå dvs. nivå 3 kontra B1 som har nivå 2.Del-66.A.20(a) 2 fastslår att en B1 i fråga om avionik system endast kan få privilegier i:
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
”Replacement of avionicline replaceable units, requiring simple tests to prove their serviceability, shall also be included in the privileges.”
Detta är lag texten.
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
GM (Guidance Material) är ej lag, utan endast en möjlighet till riktlinjer i tolkning av lagtexten. GM 66.A.20(a) skriver:
”The category B1 licence also permits the certification of work involving avionicsystems, providing the serviceability of the system can be established by a simple self-test facility, other on-boardtest systems/equipment or by simple ramp test equipment. Defect rectification involving test equipmentwhich requires an element of decision making in itsapplication - other than a simple go/no-go decision -cannot be certified.”
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
Man väljer i GM att i ett vidare begrepp sammanfatta lagtextens ”replacement” och ”tests” med ordet ”work”.
Något annat skall inte tolkas in i ordet.
Med detta som riktlinjer läser vi sedan Del-145.A.35, lagtexten:
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
(g) When the conditions of paragraphs(a), (b), (d), (f) and, where applicable, paragraph (c) have been fulfilled by the certifying staff, the organisation shallissue a certification authorisation that clearly specifies the scope and limits of such authorisation
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
(h) The certification authorisation must be in a style that makes its scope clear to the certifying staff and any authorised person who may require to examine the authorisation. Where codes are used to define scope, the organisation shall make a code translationreadily available.
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
Med allt ovan kan vi sedan göra en sammanfattning enligt nedan:B1 och B2 har i sin grundutbildning vad det gäller tex. lödning och klämning samma utbildningsnivå. Sedan kan det vara andra regler tex. tillverkarkrav som styr om ytterligare behörighetsbevis behövs.Vad det gäller Avionik testutrustning så har B1 ett lägre krav på utbildning än B2.
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
En B1 kan alltså byta LRU:er göra enkla tester som bekräftas med ett ”Go-no-Go” från systemet. Skulle utfallet bli ”No-go” kan en B1 inte gå vidare utan en B2 måste till för att göra Troubble shooting.
”Enklare testutrustning” kan klassas på samma vis dvs. ger testutrustningen ett klart utfall go-no-go?
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
Som vi ser av Del 145, så skall organisationen ha både B1 och B2 personal för att kunna utfärda underhållsintyg för hela luftfartyget. Av deras auktorisation (eller bilaga till denna) skall det tydligt kunna utläsas vilka privilegier innehavaren har.
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
Del-145 organisationen skall i sin MOE tydligt beskriva var gränserna går för just de luftfartyg man har i sin approval.
Detta kan innebära, att ända ner till enskilda tasks på specifika luftfartygstyper beskriva vad som är B1 respektive B2 tasks, för att det aldrig skall råda tvivel om att rätt release görs.
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
Eftersom detta tillhör procedurerna i MOE så är det till sist Transportstyrelsen som godkänner organisationens upplägg.
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
Kan då en B1 få göra en klämning på en kontakt till
en LRU i ATA 22?
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
Rent klämningsmässigt kan detta vara möjligt, men med tanke på hur detta har inverkan på ATA 22 och att det innebära komplicerade tester, samt att det måste finnas en insikt på, hur andra system kan påverkas av klämningen bör detta falla under en B2 att releasa.
B1 versus B2
2010-09-22
En B1 kan alltså inte ersätta en B2. Var gränserna går skall med hjälp av lagtext samt
riktlinjer ovan fastställas av underhållsorganisationen och beskrivas i
organisationens MOE.
2010-09-22
60
Frågor?That´s all Folks
2011-05-30