av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5
DESCRIPTION
av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5. = 25. = 127. Choice of proposal distribution for importance sampling. Non-Gaussian results from Lorenz (1996) model. EnKF for Lorenz (1996) nonlinear system, H = I, R = I. Compute PF weights (diagnostic) prior to each EnKF update - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
av. squared error of posterior mean
= 5.5
= 25
= 127
![Page 8: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Choice of proposal distribution for importance sampling
![Page 19: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Non-Gaussian results from Lorenz (1996) model• EnKF for Lorenz (1996) nonlinear system, H =
I, R = I. • Compute PF weights (diagnostic) prior to each
EnKF update• Vary dt of observations to vary non-
Gaussianity of prior
![Page 21: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Analysis quality and “degree of collapse”• Max weight when PF analysis is no better than
obs?• Consider (again) simple, Gaussian example (P =
R = I)
![Page 22: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: av. squared error of posterior mean = 5.5](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062501/568167f2550346895ddd6728/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)