august 2014 port state control annual report - · pdf filethis annual port state control (psc)...

Port State Control Annual Report [English]

August 2014

PPhhoottooggrraapphhss ooff DDeeffiicciieenncciieess iiddeennttiiffiieedd dduurriinngg PPoorrtt SSttaattee CCoonnttrrooll

LLiiffee SSaavviinngg

Broken safety belt

Damaged lifeboat seat

Poor condition of lifeboat hull

Inappropriate resetting of on-load release gear

FFiirree SSaaffeettyy

MMAARRPPOOLL

Oily inside of discharge pipe

Oily water separator clogged

Cracked fire door

Noncombustible compound missing on A-class bulkhead

UUnnaacccceeppttaabbllee hhoolldd--bbaacckk hhooookk ffoorr AA--ccllaassss ffiirree ddoooorr

MMaacchhiinneerryy SSppaaccee

LLooaadd LLiinnee

WWaasstteedd hhaattcchh ccoovveerr sseeccuurriinngg ddeevviiccee

Oily and dirty engine room

Oily lagging of F.O. piping

Holed ventilator top

OOtthheerrss

GGaapp ooff hhaattcchh ccoovveerr ssiiddee cclleeaatt

HHeeaavviillyy wwaasstteedd oonn--ddeecckk ppiippiinngg

WWaasstteedd mmoooorriinngg lliinnee

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

Foreword This annual Port State Control (PSC) report summarizes deficiencies identified by PSC inspections carried out in various countries around the world. This report is prepared with the objective of building awareness of the present state of PSC as well as to improve future maintenance and inspections, and also Safety Management System is compiled into the following Chapters. “Chapter 1”: Status of Implementation and Recent Developments in PSC Worldwide “Chapter 2”: Statistical Analysis of Detained Ships registered to ClassNK “Chapter 3”: Statistics & Analysis of ISM Deficiencies raised to NKSMC Ships “Chapter 4”: Statistical Data from Tokyo MOU and Paris MOU Port State Control has been found to be a very effective tool in reducing the number of substandard ships as well as improving maritime safety and pollution prevention. There has been a significant increase in PSC activity worldwide in concert with a number of amendments to relevant international conventions. In order to carry out the effective implementation of PSC provisions, many countries have already signed and accepted a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for regional cooperation in PSC for many regions, and have established a centralized computerized database system and/or a harmonized approach. PSC inspection procedures have been improved to cover not only a ships’ hardware or documents, but also the operational requirements of the relevant conventions or shipboard maintenance under the ISM Code. In light of this background, ClassNK is working hard to increase the transparency of information related to PSC issues and to make it even more difficult for substandard ships to survive in the market place.

August 2014

Note: Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information presented in this report. However, as information is collected from a variety of sources, ClassNK cannot be held responsible for any erroneous data, judgements or conclusions that may appear in this report, in cases were the information available should prove to have been incomplete or incorrect in any respect.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter 1 Status of Implementation and Recent Developments in PSC Worldwide 1.1 Amendments to the relevant conventions

1.1.1 Electronic Chart Display and Information System ········································ 1 1.1.2 Plans and procedures for recovery of persons from the water·························· 1 1.1.3 Means of recharging breathing apparatus ··················································· 2 1.1.4 Fire-fighter’s communication ···································································· 2 1.1.5 Types of fire-fighter’s outfits ····································································· 2

1.2 Recent global developments 1.2.1 MOUs around the world

(1) European and North Atlantic region (Paris MOU) ····································· 3 (2) Asia-Pacific region (Tokyo MOU)····························································· 4 (3) Latin-American region (Viña del Mar or Latin-America Agreement) ············ 5 (4) Caribbean region (Caribbean MOU) ························································ 5 (5) Mediterranean region (Mediterranean MOU)············································ 5 (6) Indian Ocean region (Indian Ocean MOU)················································ 5 (7) Black Sea region (Black Sea MOU) ························································· 6 (8) West and Central Africa region (Abuja MOU)············································ 6 (9) Arab States of the Gulf (Riyadh MOU)····················································· 6

1.2.2 Port State Control in the United States (USCG)··········································· 6 1.2.3 Equasis ································································································· 7

1.3 Measures adopted by ClassNK 1.3.1 Treatment of the Deficiencies Identified by Port State Control Inspections

(1) Cooperative assistance with Port States and treatment of the deficiencies ····· 7 (2) Treatment of inspection reports by PSC officers ········································ 8

1.3.2 Minimizing the number of detained ships in order to reduce substandard ships (1) Special training at several in-house meetings ··········································· 8 (2) Meetings and informal gatherings with ship owners ·································· 8

1.3.3 Visits to Port States················································································· 9

Chapter 2 Statistical Analysis of Detained Ships Registered to ClassNK 2.1 General····································································································· 10 2.2 Data on Detentions 2.2.1 Detentions by Flag State ········································································· 10 2.2.2 Detentions by ship type ··········································································· 12 2.2.3 Detentions by ship’s age··········································································· 13 2.2.4 Detentions by ship size (Gross Tonnage) ····················································· 14 2.2.5 Detentions by Port State·········································································· 15

2.3 Analysis of Detainable Deficiencies 2.3.1 Detainable Deficiencies per Category ······················································· 16 2.3.2 Frequently Reported Deficiencies ···························································· 17

2.4 Analysis of Detainable Deficiencies by Port State 2.4.1 China·································································································· 23 2.4.2 Australia ····························································································· 24 2.4.3 Japan·································································································· 24


2.4.4 U.S.A. ································································································· 25 2.4.5 India··································································································· 25 2.4.6 Republic of Korea·················································································· 25 2.4.7 Indonesia····························································································· 26 2.4.8 Canada································································································ 26 2.4.9 Russian Federation ··············································································· 26 2.4.10 Italy ·································································································· 27 2.4.11 Netherlands ······················································································· 27

Chapter 3

Statistics & Analysis of ISM Deficiencies raised to NKSMC Ships 3.1 Statistics of ISM deficiency cases

3.1.1 Total number and average rate ······························································ 28 3.1.2 Statistics of NKSMC Ships and ISM Deficiencies ······································· 28 3.1.2.1 Per Property of ship ········································································· 28 3.1.2.2 Per Factors related to Company ························································· 33 3.1.2.3 Per Port State··················································································· 36

3. 2 Analysis of ISM Deficiencies 3.2.1 Number of ISM deficiencies sorted by relevant ISM Code requirement ········· 37 3.2.2 ISM Deficiencies and Detentions per Port State ········································ 38 3.2.3 ISM Deficiencies and PSC Action Code ····················································· 39 Appendix: Sample of PSC inspection reports ················································· 43

Chapter 4 Statistical Data from Tokyo MOU and Paris MOU 4.1 Tokyo MOU

4.1.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities········································ 52 4.1.2 Black List of Flag States ········································································ 53 4.1.3 Detentions by Recognized Organization ···················································· 54 4.1.4 Deficiencies by Category········································································· 55

4.2 Paris MOU 4.2.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities········································ 56 4.2.2 Black List of Flag States ········································································ 57 4.2.3 Deficiencies by Category········································································· 58 4.2.4 Recognized Organization Performance Table ············································· 59


1

Chapter 1

Status of Implementation and Recent Developments in PSC Worldwide

1.1 Amendments to the relevant conventions Major amendments to international conventions and to the relevant regulations that came into effect from 2012 through 2014 are summarized below. 1.1.1 Electronic Chart Display and Information System (SOLAS V/19)

Entry into force: 1 July 2012 [Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-0907] Paragraphs 2.1.4 and 2.10, 2.11 relating to the Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) were revised and newly added to SOLAS Chapter V/19. An Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) and back-up arrangement will be phased in from 1 July 2012. （１） Passenger ship

(i) Passenger ship constructed on or after 1 July 2012, not later than the initial safety equipment survey.

(ii) Passenger ship constructed before 1 July 2012, not later than the first safety equipment survey on or after 1 July 2014.

（２） Tanker (i) Tanker constructed on or after 1 July 2012, not later than the initial safety

equipment survey. (ii) Tanker constructed before 1 July 2012, not later than the first safety

equipment survey on or after 1 July 2015. （３） Cargo ship other than tanker

(i) Cargo ship, of 10,000GT and upwards constructed on or after 1 July 2013, not later than the initial safety equipment survey.

(ii) Cargo ship, of 3,000GT and upward but less than 10,000GT constructed on or after 1 July 2014, not later than the initial safety equipment survey.

(iii) Cargo ship, of 50,000GT and upward constructed before 1 July 2013, not later than the first safety equipment survey on or after 1 July 2016

(iv) Cargo ship, of 20,000GT and upward but less than 50,000GT constructed before 1 July 2013, not later than the first safety equipment survey on or after 1 July 2017.

(v) Cargo ship, of 10,000GT and upward but less than 20,000GT constructed before 1 July 2013, not later than the first safety equipment survey on or after 1 July 2018.

（４） Ship constructed under the conditions of above (1)(ii), (2)(ii), (3)(iii), (iv) and (v), but delivered after the applicable due date, not later than initial safety equipment survey.

1.1.2 Plans and procedures for recovery of persons from the water (SOLAS III/17-1)

Entry into force: 1 July 2014 [Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-0985] SOLAS chapter III was amended to add new regulation 17-1 and this new regulation states that "Plans and procedures for recovery of persons from the water" shall be provided for all ships engaged in international voyage (all passenger ships other than ro-ro passenger ships and cargo ships of not less than 500 tons). Application:


2

1) New ships constructed (keel-laid) on or after 1 July 2014: Classification survey at new building stage

2) Existing ships (ships constructed before 1 July 2014): By the first periodical or renewal safety equipment survey of the ship, whichever comes first after 1 July 2014

1.1.3 Means of recharging breathing apparatus (SOLAS II-2/15.2.2.6)

Entry into force: 1 July 2014 [Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-0947 & 0990] SOLAS regulation II-2/15 was amended to add new paragraph 2.2.6 and this new paragraph states that an onboard means of recharging breathing apparatus used during drills or a suitable number of spare cylinders shall be carried on board to replace those used. Application:


2) Existing ships (ships constructed before 1 July 2014): By 1 July 2014 1.1.4 Fire-fighter’s communication (SOLAS II-2/10.10.4)

Entry into force: 1 July 2014 [Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-0947 & 0990] SOLAS regulation II-2/10 was amended to add new paragraph 10.4. This new paragraph states that a minimum of two two-way portable radiotelephone apparatus for each fire party for fire-fighter’s communication shall be carried on board and those two-way portable radiotelephone apparatus shall be intrinsically safe or of an explosion-proof type. Application:


2) Existing ships (ships constructed before 1 July 2014): By the first survey after 1 July 2018

1.1.5 Types of fire-fighter’s outfits (Amendments to SOLAS II-2/1 & 10.1)

Entry into force: 1 July 2014 [Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-0947 & 0990] SOLAS II-2/1 & 10.1 were amended and due to these amendments, compressed air breathing apparatus shall be fitted with an audible alarm and a visual or other device which will alert the user before the volume of the air in the cylinder has been reduced to no less than 200 l. Application: 1) New ships constructed (keel-laid) on or after 1 July 2014: Classification survey at

new building stage 2) Existing ships (ships constructed before 1 July 2014): By 1 July 2019

New amendments to conventions are also introduced on the ClassNK Website in the section, ‘IMO International Convention Calendar’. (http://www.classnk.or.jp)


3

1.2 Recent global developments 1.2.1 MOUs around the world In order to carry out PSC effectively, a recommendation concerning regional co-operation in the control of ships and discharges was adopted as a resolution by the IMO. In July 1982, fourteen European countries signed the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Paris MOU), and today many countries have signed and accepted similar MOUs around the world. Currently, nine MOUs exist around the world and their respective activities in terms of implementing PSC are described below.

European and North Atlantic region ：Paris MOU (http://www.parismou.org/) Asia-Pacific region ：Tokyo MOU (http://www.tokyo-mou.org/) Latin American region ：Viña del Mar (http://www.acuerdolatino.int.ar/) Caribbean region ：Caribbean MOU (http://www.caribbeanmou.org/) Mediterranean region ：Mediterranean MOU (http://www.medmou.org/) Indian Ocean region ：Indian Ocean MOU (http://www.iomou.org/) Black Sea region ：Black Sea MOU (http://www.bsmou.org/) West and Central Africa region ：Abuja MOU (http://www.abujamou.org/) Arab States of the Gulf ：Riyadh MOU （http://www.riyadhmou.org/）

(1) European and North Atlantic region (Paris MOU)

1) Activity Established: 1 July 1982 Members: Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland,

France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom

-1 The Paris MOU consists of 27 participating maritime Administrations and covers the waters of the European coastal States and the North Atlantic basin from North America to Europe. The Paris MOU states that their aim is to eliminate the operation of sub-standard ships through a harmonized system of port State control.

-2 Press releases have announced the recent activities of the Paris MOU as follows. Press release dated 14 October 2013

The Paris MOU announced that seven (7) ships were detained for MLC-related deficiencies during the first month since entry into force of MLC2006 and this corresponded to 10% of the total number of detentions (68) in the Paris MoU area in this period.

Press release dated 17 February 2014 The Paris MOU announced the preliminary results of the Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery, which was conducted from 1 September to 30 November 2013.

- 68 ships (41% of all detentions) were detained over the 3 month period as a direct result of the CIC for deficiencies related to propulsion and auxiliary machinery.

- More than half (54%) of all CIC-topic related detentions involved ships of 20 years or more.

Press release dated 16 June 2014 - The Paris MOU announced new targeting lists Paris MOU which take effect

from 1 July 2014.


4

2) New Inspection Regime (NIR)

-1 Classification of the Ship Risk Profile A Ship Risk Profile is based on the flag, Recognized Organization and company performance, the number of deficiencies and detentions recorded for the ship, past inspection records of the ship, as well as the ship’s age and ship type. The Ship Risk Profile classifies ships into Low Risk Ships (LRS), Standard Risk Ships (SRS), and High Risk Ships (HRS). The time window is set according to the Ship Risk Profile as follows: - HRS: between 5-6 months after the last inspection - SRS: between 10-12 months after the last inspection - LRS: between 24-36 months after the last inspection

-2 Banned Ships The banning criteria for the first and second ban have been amended as follows: - If the ship flies a black listed flag, it will be banned after more than 3 detentions

in the last 36 months - If the ship flies a grey listed flag, it will be banned after more than 3 detentions

in the last 24 months Any subsequent detention after the 2nd banning will lead to a ban, regardless of

the flag of the ship. -3 Reporting obligations The ETA72 (a 72 hour pre-arrival) notification requirement has been widened to

include all ships with a HRS profile as well as all bulk carriers, chemical tankers, gas carriers, oil tankers, and passenger ships 12 years of age or older subject to an expanded inspection.

Further, all ships are required to notify their ETA24 (a 24 hour pre-arrival), ATA (the actual time of arrival), and ATD (the actual time of departure).

(2) Asia-Pacific region (Tokyo MOU)

1) Activity Established: 1 December 1993 Members: Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Fiji, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan,

Republic of Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Russian Federation, Singapore, Thailand, Vanuatu, and Vietnam

-1 The main objectives of the Memorandum have been announced as follows: 1. to establish an effective Port State control regime in the Asia-Pacific region

through the co-operation of its members and the harmonization of their activities,

2. to eliminate substandard shipping so as to promote maritime safety, 3. to protect the marine environment, and 4. to safeguard working and living conditions onboard ships.

-2 Press releases announced the activities of the Tokyo MOU as follows. Press release dated 1 November 2013

The Tokyo MOU announced that the 24th meeting of the PSC Committee of the Tokyo MOU was held in Tokyo, Japan from 28 to 31 October 2013.

- The Tokyo MOU celebrated its 20 years anniversary during this meeting and the relevant forum was organized.

- The Committee approved the arrangements for the CIC on STCW Hours of Rest that will be carried out from 1 September to 30 November 2014 with the Paris MOU jointly.


5

- The 25th meeting of the PSC Committee will be held in New Zealand in November 2014.

Press release dated 1 April 2014 The Tokyo MOU announced the preliminary results of the Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery, which was conducted from 1 September to 30 November 2013. - A total of 282 detentions were recorded during the CIC inspections, among which 72 or 25.5% of them were detained as a direct result of the CIC.

- A detailed analysis of the results of the CIC will be considered by the PSC Committee in November 2014, after which a full report will be submitted to the International Maritime Organization (IMO).

2) New Inspection Regime (NIR) The NIR will enter into force from 1 January 2014. A Ship Risk Profile is based on the flag, Recognized Organization and company performance, the number of deficiencies and detentions recorded for the ship, past inspection records of the ship, as well as the ship’s age and ship type. The Ship Risk Profile classifies ships into Low Risk Ships (LRS), Standard Risk Ships (SRS), and High Risk Ships (HRS). The time window is set according to the Ship Risk Profile as follows:

- LRS: 9 to 18 months after the last inspection - SRS: 5 to 8 months after the last inspection - HRS: 2 to 4 months after the last inspection

(3) Latin-American region (Viña del Mar or Latin-America Agreement)

Established: 5 November 1992 Members: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Dominica, Ecuador,

Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela (4) Caribbean region (Caribbean MOU)

Established: 9 February 1996 Members: Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Cayman Islands,

Cuba, Curacao, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Netherlands Antilles, St. Kitts and Nevis, Suriname, and Trinidad & Tobago

(5) Mediterranean region (Mediterranean MOU)

Established: 11 July 1997 Members: Algeria, Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Morocco, Tunisia,

and Turkey (6) Indian Ocean region (Indian Ocean MOU)

Established: 5 June 1998 Members: Australia, Bangladesh, Djibouti, Eritrea, France (La Reunion Island), India,

Iran, Kenya, Maldives, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sultanate of Oman, Tanzania, Union of Comoros and Yemen

-1 In 2013, the Indian Ocean MOU carried out a Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery from 1 September to 30 November 2013 in line with the CIC carried out by the Tokyo MOU and the Paris MoU.

-2 According to Annual Report 2013 of the Indian Ocean MOU, a total of 5,320 inspections were carried out and 376 vessels were detained in 2013.


6

(7) Black Sea region (Black Sea MOU) Established: 7 April 2000 Members: Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, Russian Federation, Turkey, and Ukraine -1 In 2013, the Black Sea MOU carried out a Concentrated Inspection Campaign

(CIC) on Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery from 1 September to 30 November 2013 in line with the CIC carried out by the Tokyo MOU and the Paris MoU.

-2 The 15th meeting of the PSC Committee of the Black Sea MOU was held in Constanta, Romania from 8 to 10 April 2014.

-3 According to Annual Report 2013 of the Black Sea MOU, a total of 5,080 inspections were carried out and 169 vessels were detained in 2013.

-4 CIC on STCW Hours of Rest is scheduled to be carried out from 1 September to 30 November 2014.

(8) West and Central Africa region (Abuja MOU)

Established: 22 October 1999 Members: Angola, Benin, Cote d’Ivoire, Gabon, Ghana, Nigeria, Republic of Congo,

Republic of Guinea, Sao Tome & Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa、The Gambia and Togo

(9) Arab States of the Gulf (Riyadh MOU)

Established: 30 June 2004 Members: The Kingdom of Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,

The Sultanate of Oman, and United Arab Emirates

1.2.2 Port State Control in the United States (USCG) 1) Activity

Although the United States Coast Guard (USCG) is not a member of any MOU, it is an observer at a number of MOUs, and undertakes effective PSC in cooperation with other MOUs. In the 1970's, the U.S. Coast Guard increased its emphasis on the examination of foreign vessels. Although this emphasis was primarily driven by requirements to ensure compliance with the then new U.S. pollution prevention and navigation safety regulations, boarding officers also exercised Port State authority when instances of non-compliance with SOLAS and MARPOL were noted. In 1994, the U.S. introduced risk-management methodologies into the Port State Control program in order to allocate limited inspection resources to where they could do the most good, by identifying those ships, ship owners, classification societies and Flag Administrations that were most often found lacking in meeting their international Convention responsibilities. On 1 January 2001, the USCG implemented an initiative to identify high-quality ships, called Qualship 21, quality shipping for the 21st century. This program has since proven to be very effective in recognizing well operated and maintained ships of good quality and continues in use today.

2) PSC Safety Targeting Matrix The USCG uses the Port State Control Safety and Environmental Protection Compliance Targeting Matrix which enables the Coast Guard to rationally and systematically determine the probable risk posed by non-U.S. ships calling at U.S. ports. The matrix is used to decide which ships Port State Control Officers should examine on any given day, in any given port. The numerical score, along with other performance based factors, determines a ship's priority for examination. (reference: http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cgcvc/)


7

3) Banning of foreign vessels All foreign flagged vessels operating in U.S. waters are required to be maintained in compliance with U.S. regulations, international conventions and other required standards. However, when a vessel has been repeatedly detained by the USCG (totaling three detentions within a twelve month period) and it is determined that failure to effectively implement the SMS onboard may be a contributing factor for the substandard conditions that led to the detentions, the USCG Headquarters (USCG-HQ) will issue a Letter of Denial prohibiting the ship from further entering any U.S. port until such time as certain actions have been taken to rectify the situation. However, even if a vessel has less than three detentions in twelve months, a Letter of Denial may be issued to any vessel which, in the option of the USCG; 1. may pose a significant risk to the safety of the vessel, crew or the marine

environment; or 2. has a history of accidents, pollution incidents, or serious repair problems which

creates reason to believe that such a vessel may be unsafe or create a threat to the marine environment; or

3. has discharged oil or other hazardous material in violation of any law of the United States or in a manner or quantities inconsistent with the provisions of any treaty to which the United States is a party.

1.2.3 Equasis Equasis is a unique database that collects safety-related information on the world’s merchant fleet from both public and private sources and makes it easily accessible on the Internet (http://www.equasis.org/). It displays information from public authorities (Port State inspection and detention information from the three participating PSC regions, i.e. the Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU, and USCG) and industry players (such as information on class, insurance, participation in industry inspection schemes, and quality organizations), all free of charge. 1.3 Measures adopted by ClassNK 1.3.1 Handling of the Deficiencies Identified by Port State Control Inspections (1) Cooperative assistance with Port States and treatment of deficiencies

When surveyors of the Society are notified of the detention of a ship classed with ClassNK, the Society actively co-operates with the reporting PSC Authority in a number of ways. The more direct of these steps include the following. - Surveyors liaise with port state control authorities to ensure that they are called in

as soon as appropriate when deficiencies related to class and/or statutory matters are identified.

- Surveyors liaise with PSC officers to ensure uniformity of interpretation of class and statutory requirements.

- Surveyors provide PSC officers with background information, extracts from reports pertinent to the inspection, and details of outstanding recommendations of class and statutory items whenever so requested by the port state.

- Attending surveyors examine not only the condition of the deficiencies identified by the PSC officers but also the general condition of the hull, machinery and equipment of the subject ship to the extent of an annual survey, carefully considering the seriousness of any deficiencies when they attend ships that have been subject to an intervention action by the port state.


8

(2) Treatment of inspection reports by PSC officers

When a surveyor receives an inspection report from a port state authority, the report is sent to the ClassNK Head Office. The report is immediately examined by experienced staff to identify the causes of the deficiencies. This examination is carried out for all ships for which such reports are received, and the results are circulated to all sections concerned, including all members of the board of directors, as necessary. The results are also reflected a ClassNK PSC database that has been developed for the purpose of providing surveyors with PSC related information electronically. The results of this examination are also submitted to the Flag State Administration of the ship, as required. Further, visits may also be made to the ship owner or manager, when deemed appropriate, to advise them of the relevant deficiencies noted and to encourage them to more proactively improve the routine maintenance of their ships and take other measures as necessary to ensure the highest levels of safe and environmentally friendly operation. In cases where the deficiencies pointed out by the port state authority are determined to be related to previous surveys conducted by surveyors of the Society, those surveys are treated as a non-conforming service, and appropriate corrective and preventive actions are taken in accordance with the ClassNK quality system.

1.3.2 Minimizing the number of detained ships in order to reduce substandard ships (1) Special training at several in-house meetings

Special training on PSC related issues is conducted at several meetings held regularly for general managers and managers, to ensure that surveyors carry out full and effective surveys with an uncompromising attitude towards ensuring the quality and safety of the ships classed with the Society. Special re-training is also carried out under the supervision of the Head Office and regional managers, as needed, for those surveyors who have conducted any surveys determined to be a non-conforming service under the quality system of the Society.

(2) Meetings and informal gatherings with ship owners

(a) Visiting Management Companies When a ship classed with ClassNK is detained by a Port State, if deemed necessary, a senior surveyor or manager of the Society visits the owner or the company managing the ship to discuss what steps can be taken to improve the routine maintenance of the ships in their fleet, so as to prevent both a recurrence of the deficiencies noted and the occurrence of similar problems in the future.

(b) Meetings and seminars

PSC related issues are regularly discussed at informal gatherings and technical committee meetings held with ship owners. At such times, explanations are given and documents presented, with emphasis placed on the importance of proactively ensuring the proper maintenance of ships and education of crew in order to prevent the detention of ships.

(c) Publications

The “ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control” is distributed to all registered shipowners and operators in the ClassNK fleet. A checklist entitled “Good Maintenance on board Ships” has also been prepared in electronic format, which can be used by the ship’s crew for quick and easy inspection of a ship before entering port.


9

1.3.3 Visits to Port States Personnel from the ClassNK Head Office as well as local survey offices are assigned to visit the headquarters or offices of various Port States with the aim of introducing ClassNK and exchanging views on matters of mutual concern. In 2013, the ClassNK Head Office visited the following Port States for the above-mentioned purpose.

Australia Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) China Maritime Safety Administration (MSA) India Indian Maritime Administration


10

Chapter 2

Statistical Analysis of Detained Ships Registered to ClassNK 2.1 General The data in this chapter, on ships detained due to deficiencies identified during PSC inspections, is based on the following sources:

(1) Notifications from Port States issued in accordance with IMO Resolution A.1052(27) “Procedure for Port State Control, and

(2) Publications related to detained ships issued by the USCG, the Paris MOU, and the Tokyo MOU.

From January to December 2013, 447 PSC detentions were reported relating to 411 ships classed by NK. This included cases of detention for reasons not related to class or to NK itself. The total number of NK-registered ships (500 GT or over) was 7,620 at the end of December 2013. Therefore, the 411 ships detained represent about 5.4% of the total number of ships in the NK fleet. Further, detention ratio (Detentions/Registered number in 2013) of the NK fleet in 2013 is about 5.9%. 2.2 Data on Detentions 2.2.1 Detentions by Flag State

Table 2.2.1 Detentions by Flag State (NK)

Number of Registered Ships (500GT or over)

Number of Detentions

Detention Ratio (%) (= Detentions /

Registered Number in each year)

Flag State

2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 Panama 3,048 3,160 3,160 246 258 249 8.1 8.2 7.9 Liberia 299 349 396 26 17 36 8.7 4.9 9.1 Marshall Islands 249 307 343 18 19 21 7.2 6.2 6.1 Malta 181 184 200 18 16 21 9.9 8.7 10.5 Singapore 610 649 691 21 21 17 3.4 3.2 2.5 Hong Kong 422 435 458 18 17 14 4.3 3.9 3.1 Indonesia 108 160 170 4 4 9 3.7 2.5 5.3 Thailand 72 72 67 8 10 8 11.1 13.9 11.9 Bahamas 131 134 144 14 9 7 10.7 6.7 4.9 Turkey 58 68 69 7 3 7 12.1 4.4 10.1 St. Vincent * 27 25 22 8 8 6 29.6 32.0 27.8 Cook Islands 3 9 21 1 3 6 33.3 33.3 28.6 Cyprus 86 85 86 7 6 5 8.1 7.1 5.8 Japan 810 840 860 0 3 5 0 0.4 0.6 Philippines 99 89 87 4 8 5 4.0 9.0 5.7 Others ‐ ‐ ‐ 31 35 31 ‐ ‐ ‐ Total 6,914 7,319 7,620 431 437 447 6.2 6.0 5.9

* Refers to St. Vincent and the Grenadines. The same applies in all subsequent tables or figures.


11

Of those Flag State Administrations with ten (10) or more NK classed ships, the following Administrations were identified as having a detention ratio higher than 10% in 2013: Malta, Thailand, Turkey, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Cook Islands.

Fig 2.2.1-2 Detention Ratio by Flag (NK)

7.2

10.7

0

44.9

6.23.9

13.9

7.1

0.4

99.110.1

8.78.1

33.3

12.111.1

3.73.4

9.9

8.1

29.6

4.3

33.3

4.46.7

2.53.2

8.78.2

32

5.7

0.6

5.8

28.627.8

4.9

11.9

5.33.12.5

10.5

6.17.9

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

Panam

a

Liberi

a

Marsha

ll Isla

mdsMalt

a

Singap

ore

Hong K

ong

Indon

esia

Thaila

nd

Baham

as

Turkey

St. Vinc

ent *

Cook I

sland

s

Cyprus

Japa

n

Philipp

ines

Flag State

Dete

ntion R

atio

(%)

2011

2012

2013

Fig 2.2.1-1 Detention by Flag (NK)

246

2618 18 21

4 8 14 7 1 7 0 4

31

258

17 19 16 21 174 10 9 3 3 6 3 8

353621 21 17 14 9 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 5

318

18 8

249

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

Panam

a

Liberi

a

Marsha

ll Isla

mdsMalt

a

Singap

ore

Hong K

ong

Indon

esia

Thaila

nd

Baham

as

Turkey

St. Vinc

ent *

Cook I

sland

s

Cyprus

Japa

n

Philipp

ines

Others

Flag State

Dete

ntions

2011

2012

2013


12

2.2.2 Detentions by ship type Table 2.2.2 Detentions by Ship Type (NK)

Number of Detentions Detention Ratio (%)

(= Detentions / Registered Number in each year) Ship Type

Number of Registered

Ships in 2013 (500GT or

over) 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013

Bulk Carrier 3,180 209 216 246 7.2 7.2 7.7 General Cargo 766 93 100 80 14.3 13.6 10.4 Container Carrier 594 31 38 35 5.3 6.5 5.9 Chip Carrier 128 13 9 6 8.5 6.5 4.7 Cement Carrier 105 1 0 1 1.0 0 1.0 Ro-Ro Ship 44 9 6 6 9.8 12.8 13.6 Reefer Carrier 142 15 18 18 8.6 12.1 12.7 Vehicles Carrier 352 8 10 14 2.3 2.8 4.0 Oil Tanker 752 10 6 10 1.4 0.8 1.3 Oil/Chemical Tanker 672 31 27 22 5.0 4.2 3.4 Gas Carrier 365 9 6 6 2.5 1.7 1.6 Others 520 2 1 3 1.0 0.2 0.6 Total 7,620 431 437 447 A detention ratio of General cargo ships, Ro-Ro ships, and Reefer carriers was more than 10% and they were identified as having a higher detention ratio than other ship types noted. (‘Detention ratio’ was determined by dividing the number of detentions by the number of ships of each respective ship type in the NK fleet.)

Fig. 2.2.2-1Detentions by Ship Type (NK)

93

3113

1 9 8 10 9 2

100

38

9 0 6 10 6 6 1

246

35

6 1 6 14 10 6 315

31

209

18

27

216

1822

80

050

100150200250300

Bulk C

arrier

Genera

l Carg

o

Contai

ner C

arrier

Chip C

arrier

Cemen

t Carr

ier

Ro-Ro S

hip

Reefer

Carr

ier

Vehicle

s Carr

ier

Oil Tan

ker

Oil/Chem

ical T

anke

r

Gas C

arrier

Others

Det

entio

ns

201120122013

Fig. 2.2.2-2 Detention Ratio by Ship Type (%)

7.2

14.3

5.3

8.5

1

9.8

8.6

2.31.4

5

2.5

1

7.2

13.6

6.5 6.5

0

12.812.1

2.8

0.8

4.2

1.7

0.2

7.7

10.4

5.9

4.7

1

13.612.7

4

1.3

3.4

1.60.6

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.0

Bulk C

arrier

Genera

l Carg

o

Contai

ner C

arrier

Chip C

arrier

Cemen

t Carr

ier

Ro-Ro S

hip

Reefer

Carr

ier

Vehicle

s Carr

ier

Oil Tan

ker

Oil/Chem

ical T

anke

r

Gas C

arrier

Others

Det

entio

n R

atio

(%)

201120122013


13

2.2.3 Detentions by ship’s age

Table 2.2.3 Detentions by Ship’s Age (NK)


(= Detentions / Registered Number in each year) Ship’s age


Ships in 2013 (500GT or over) 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013

Up to 5 years old 3,055 71 67 57 2.6 2.2 1.9

Over 5 and up to 10 1,663 68 78 116 5.3 5.4 7.0

Over 10 and up to 15 1,105 94 86 77 7.7 7.4 7.0

Over 15 and up to 20 1,050 88 98 101 10.5 10.4 9.6

Over 20 and up to 25 404 41 35 43 10.7 9.2 10.6

Over 25 343 69 73 53 16.5 18.8 15.5

Total 7,620 431 437 447

Fig. 2.2.3-1Detentions by Ship's Age (NK)

71 68

94 88

41

696778

8698

35

7357

116

77

101

4353

020406080

100120140

Up to 5 Over 5 andup to 10

Over 10 andup to 15

Over 15 andup to 20

Over 20 andup to 25

Over 25

Det

entio

ns

201120122013

Fig. 2.2.3-2 Detention Ratio by Ship's Age (NK)

2.6

5.37.7

10.5 10.7

16.5

2.2

5.47.4

10.49.2

18.8

1.9

7 7

9.6 10.6

15.5

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Up to 5 Over 5 andup to 10

Over 10 andup to 15

Over 15 andup to 20

Over 20 andup to 25

Over 25Det

entio

n R

atio

(%)

201120122013


14

2.2.4 Detentions by ship size （Gross Tonnage)

Table 2.2.4 Detentions by Ship Size （Gross Tonnage) (NK)


(= Detentions / Registered Number in each year) Gross Ton (x 1,000)


Ships in 2013 (500GT or over) 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013

Up to 10 2,586 164 147 137 6.6 5.8 5.3 Over 10 and up to 20 1,273 89 97 100 7.4 7.8 7.9 Over 20 and up to 30 910 63 64 55 8.1 7.4 6.0 Over 30 and up to 40 1,051 61 68 76 6.7 6.9 7.2 Over 40 and up to 50 592 28 26 20 5.5 4.6 3.4 Over 50 and up to 60 331 7 8 16 2.6 2.6 4.8 Over 60 and up to 80 213 7 9 14 3.5 4.3 6.6 Over 80 664 12 18 29 2.1 2.8 4.4 Total 7,620 431 437 447

Fig.2.2.4-1 Detentions by Gross Tonnage (NK)

164

89

63 61

28

7 7 12

147

97

64 68

268 9

18

137

100

55

76

20 16 1429

020406080

100120140160180

Up to 10 Over 10and up to

20

Over 20and up to

30

Over 30and up to

40

Over 40and up to

50

Over 50and up to

60

Over 60and up to

80

Over 80

Det

entio

ns

201120122013

x 1,000 GT

Fig. 2.2.4-2 Detention Ratio by Gross Tonnage (NK)

6.6

7.48.1

6.7

5.5

2.6

3.5

2.1

5.8

7.87.4

6.9

4.6

2.6

4.3

2.8

5.3

7.9

6

7.2

3.4

4.8

6.6

4.4

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08.09.0

Up to 10 Over 10and up to

20

Over 20and up to

30

Over 30and up to

40

Over 40and up to

50

Over 50and up to

60

Over 60and up to

80

Over 80

Det

entio

n R

atio

(%)

201120122013

x 1,000 GT


15

2.2.5 Detentions by Port State Table 2.2.5 Detentions by Port State (NK)

Port State 2011 2012 2013 China 117 120 141 Australia 83 77 79 Japan 40 31 27 U.S.A.(*1) 21 18 27 India 26 32 20 Republic of Korea 6 15 15 Indonesia 23 24 14 Canada 3 6 10 Russian Federation 12 14 9 Italy 5 2 9 Netherlands 9 8 7 United Kingdom 6 6 6 France 4 2 6 Iran 5 6 5 Egypt 1 6 5 Brazil 0 7 5 Viet Nam 9 8 4 Chile 4 4 4 Singapore 3 6 4 New Zealand 1 2 4 Turkey 0 5 4 Spain 10 11 3 Slovenia 2 0 3 Gibraltar 1 0 3 Bulgaria 0 0 3 Others 40 27 30 Total 431 437 447 (*1) Including Puerto Rico Detentions by members of the Tokyo MOU made approximately two thirds of the total number of ships detained in 2013.

0

1

2

10

0

1

3

4

9

0

1

5

4

6

9

5

12

3

23

6

26

21

40

83

117

0

0

0

11

5

2

6

4

8

7

6

6

2

6

8

2

14

6

24

15

32

18

31

77

120

3

3

3

3

4

4

4

4

4

5

5

5

6

6

7

9

9

10

14

15

20

27

27

79

141

Bulgaria

Gibraltar

Slovenia

Spain

Turkey

New Zealand

Singapore

Chile

Viet Nam

Brazil

Egypt

Iran

France

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Italy

Russian Federation

Canada

Indonesia

Republic of Korea

India

U.S.A.(*1)

Japan

Australia

China

20132012

2011

Fig. 2.2.5 Detentions by Port State (NK)


16

2.3 Analysis of Detainable Deficiencies 2.3.1 Detainable Deficiencies per Category In 2013, a total of 1,169 detainable deficiencies were reported relating to 447 detentions, i.e., deficiencies which were serious enough to jeopardise the ship’s seaworthiness, safety of the crew onboard, or to present an unreasonable threat of harm to the environment and therefore warranted the detention of the ship. The deficiencies are categorized as shown in Figure 2.3.1 and categories in this figure are based on those of the Tokyo MOU. Deficiencies related to fire safety and life-saving appliances combined accounted for about one-third of the total in 2013.

Fig. 2.3.1 Deficiencies per Category (NK)

5

15

16

18

12

12

15

22

3

25

21

32

20

61

47

65

81

69

134

109

155

195

2

14

10

12

5

2

10

35

4

20

32

34

29

43

39

35

65

65

131

118

125

219

5

8

11

11

12

18

18

21

22

24

25

31

36

45

50

52

52

94

119

123

166

215

0 50 100 150 200 250

CARGO OPERATIONS INCLUDING EQUIPMENT

ALARMS

OTHER

CERTIFICATE AND DOCUMENTATION -DOCUMENTS

WORKING AND LIVING CONDITIONS - LIVING CONDITIONS

ISPS

POLLUTION PREVENTION - MARPOL ANNEX Ⅵ

POLLUTION PREVENTION - MARPOL ANNEX Ⅳ

POLLUTION PREVENTION - MARPOL ANNEX Ⅴ

WORKING AND LIVING CONDITIONS - WORKING CONDITIONS

CERTIFICATE AND DOCUMENTATION -CREW CERTIFICATE

STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS

CERTIFICATE AND DOCUMENTATION -SHIP CERTIFICATE

RADIO COMMUNICATIONS

PROPULSION AND AUXILIARY MACHINERY

WATER / WEATHERTIGHT CONDITIONS

POLLUTION PREVENTION - MARPOL ANNEX Ⅰ

SAFETY OF NAVIGATION

ISM

EMERGENCY SYSTEMS

LIFESAVING APPLIANCES

FIRE SAFETY

Deficiencies

201320122011


17

2.3.2 Frequently Reported Deficiencies Figure 2.3.2 shows those items of detainable deficiencies that were reported frequently, in conjunction with the actual detention of ships in the NK fleet. Lifeboats, emergency fire pumps, and fire-dampers continue to be the major items where most detainable deficiencies were found. The items reported from 2011 to 2013 are explained in detail in paragraphs (1) to (15) below.

Fig. 2.3.2 Deficiencies reported Frequentry (NK)

0

15

23

8

9

14

14

6

17

17

11

34

41

26

42

19

0

4

15

37

52

2

19

14

10

6

16

18

5

24

14

9

12

24

21

31

20

15

15

26

36

57

13

13

13

14

14

14

15

16

16

18

19

19

20

21

22

23

32

33

33

38

53

78

6852

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Embarkation arrangements survival craft

Means of control (opening, pumps ventilation, etc)

Operational readiness of lifesaving appliances

Fire fighting equipment and appliances

Covers (hatchway-, portable-, tarpaulins, etc.)

MF/HF radio installation

Fire detection

Propulsion main engine

Sewage treatment plan

Fire prevention

Launching arrangements for survival craft

Ventilators, air pipes, casings

Oil filtering equipment

Development of plans for shipboard operations

Maintenance of the ship and equipment

Charts

Emergency souce of power- Emergency Generator

ISM

Fixed fire extinguishing installation

Fire-dampers

Emergency Fire Pump

Lifeboats

Deficiencies

201320122011


18

(1) Fire Safety Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Fire Safety)” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(1) below.

Table 2.3.2-(1) Fire Safety Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Fire-dampers 37 36 38 Wasted and holed fire-dampers Operation failure of fire-dampers

Fixed fire extinguishing system 15 26 33 Corroded and holed CO2 lines Operation failure of fire extinguishing systems

Fire prevention 17 14 18 Deteriorated non-combustible materials for cable penetrations in A-class divisions

Fire detection 14 18 15 Inoperable fire detection units Fire fighting equipment and appliances 8 10 14 Wasted and holed fire hoses

Quick closing valves, Remote control devices 15 19 13 Inoperable quick closing valves

Jacketed piping system for high pressure fuel lines 14 8 12 Operation failure of F.O. leakage alarm

Fire pumps and its pipes 12 17 12 Wasted and holed fire main line

Ventilation 12 11 11 Corroded and holed ventilator casings Malfunction of mechanical ventilators

Doors within main vertical zone 12 10 11 Malfunction of self-closing devices

(2) Life Saving Appliances Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Life Saving Appliances” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(2) below.

Table 2.3.2-(2) Life Saving Appliances Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Lifeboats 68 52 78 Lifeboat engine not started Poor maintenance of rechargeable batteries Inadequate resetting of on-load release gears

Launching and recovery arrangements for survival craft 11 9 19 Corroded boat falls

Operational readiness of lifesaving appliances 23 14 13 Inoperable / Inadequate resetting of on-load

release gear Embarkation arrangements of lifesaving appliances 0 2 13 Embarkation ladder heavily corroded and broken

Rescue boats 10 8 7 Rescue boat engine not started


19

(3) Emergency Systems Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Emergency Systems” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(3) below.

Table 2.3.2-(3) Emergency Systems Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes 52 57 53 Inoperable and unable to pressure the fire main

Emergency source of power- Emergency Generator 0 15 32 Emergency generator unable to start

Fire drills 14 21 11 Fire drill failed

Abandon ship drills 8 8 10 Abandon ship drill failed (4) ISM Related Deficiencies Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “ISM Related Deficiencies” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(4) below.

Table 2.3.2-(4) ISM Related Deficiencies Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

ISM 4 15 33 Implementation of SMS failed generally

Maintenance of ship and equipment 42 31 22 Inadequate implementation of SMS by crew

Inadequate maintenance of ship’s equipment Development of plans for shipboard operations 26 21 21 Charts management not followed SMS

Resources and personnel 15 22 12 Ship’s crew not familiar with operation of ship’s equipment

(5) Safety of Navigation Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Safety of Navigation” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(5) below.

Table 2.3.2-(5) Safety of Navigation Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Charts 19 20 23 Navigation charts not updated Navigation charts for intended voyage not available

Voyage date recorder(VDR) 9 13 12 Defective VDR / S-VDR Alarm panel showing “system error”

Nautical publications 7 5 10 Nautical publications (tide table, list of lights, list of radio signals, etc.) not updated

Lights, shapes, sound -signals 7 4 7 Inoperable navigation lights Navigation lights not supplied by batteries

Gyro compass 3 3 5 Not Operable


20

(6) MARPOL Annex I Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “MARPOL Annex I” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(6) below.

Table 2.3.2-(6) MARPOL Annex I Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Oil filtering equipment (Oily-Water Separating Equipment)

41 24 20

Inoperable oily water separator Inoperable bilge pump Oily water inside overboard discharging line Ship’s crew not familiar with operation of oil filtering equipment

15PPM alarm arrangements 10 9 12 Failure of 15PPM alarm

Control of discharge of oil 3 2 5 Unapproved by-pass line fitting on oil filtering equipment Inoperable automatic stopping device

Oil discharge monitoring and control system 3 5 4 Defective automatic stopping device

(7) Water/ Weathertight conditions Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Water/ Weathertight conditions” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(7) below.

Table 2.3.2-(7) Water/ Weathertight conditions Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Ventilators ,air pipes , casings 34 12 19 Wasted/Holed ventilators and air pipes Damaged float of air pipe heads Damaged closing devices

Hatch covers 9 6 14 Wasted / Holed hatch covers Wasted hatch cover cleats Deteriorated rubber packing

Cargo and other hatchways 8 4 5 Wasted / Holed hatch covers Wasted / cracked hatch coamings

Doors 9 5 3 Doors not closed tightly

(8) Propulsion and auxiliary machinery Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Propulsion and auxiliary machinery” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(8) below.

Table 2.3.2-(8) Propulsion and auxiliary machinery Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Propulsion main engine 6 5 16 Defective oil mist detectors Leakage of cooling water

Auxiliary engine 15 12 12 Inoperable Auxiliary engines

Other (machinery) 11 11 9 Safety valve of auxiliary boiler seized Oil leakage around auxiliary engines

Operation of machinery 8 5 7 Ship’s Crew not familiar with simulation test of over-speed trip of M/E


21

(9) Radio Communications Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Radio Communications” are shown in the Table 2.3.2-(9) below.

Table 2.3.2-(9) Radio Communications Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

MF/HF radio installation 14 16 14 Defective MF/HF radio apparatus Not operable by DC power

Reserve source of energy 22 12 10 GMDSS reserve source of energy failed

Operation / maintenance 1 0 3 Ship’s officer not familiar with operation of NBDP

(10) Ship Certificate Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Ship Certificate” are shown in the Table 2.3.2-(10) below.

Table 2.3.2-(10) Ship Certificate Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Cargo Ship Safety Equipment 1 4 6 Certificate expired The original certificate not onboard Mandatory annual survey overdue

Cargo Ship Safety Radio 1 1 5 Certificate expired The original certificate not onboard Periodical survey overdue

Load Lines 1 2 4 Certificate expired The original certificate not onboard

EIAPP 3 1 3 The original certificate not onboard Technical files not onboard

(11) Structural Conditions Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Structural Conditions” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(11) below.

Table 2.3.2-(11) Structural Conditions Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Electric equipment in general 3 1 5 Low insulation alarm malfunction

(12) Crew Certificate Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Crew Certificate” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(12) below.

Table 2.3.2-(12) Crew Certificate Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Certificates for master and officers 6 14 12

Missing of endorsement on STCW certificates by flag state Valid certificates expired


22

(13) Working Conditions Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Working Conditions” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(13) below.

Table 2.3.2-(13) Working Conditions Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Cleanliness of engine room 10 14 23 Dirty and oily engine room due to oil leakage etc. A large quantity of oily bilge in engine room

(14) MARPOL Annex V Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “MARPOL Annex V” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(14) below.

Table 2.3.2-(14) MARPOL Annex V Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Garbage 9 17 24 Inadequate entry in Garbage Record Book

(15) MARPOL Annex IV Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “MARPOL Annex IV” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(15) below.

Table 2.3.2-(15) MARPOL Annex IV Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies

Sewage treatment plant 17 24 16 Not operable


23

2.4 Analysis of Detainable Deficiencies by Port State Most frequent detainable deficiencies per port state are shown in Tables 2.4.1 to 2.4.11 according to number of detentions reported from 2011 to 2013. 2.4.1 China

Table 2.4.1 China Category of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013

Fire Safety 69 88 67 Lifesaving Appliances 46 44 58 Emergency Systems 34 33 42 Water/Weathertight conditions 19 11 24 MARPOL Annex I 25 17 19 ISM 16 24 18 MARPOL Annex V 0 1 17 Radio Communications 22 9 15 Ships Certificates and Documents 6 9 15 Safety of Navigation 5 11 14 Dangerous goods 3 1 12 Structural Conditions 6 9 9 MARPOL Annex VI 4 2 8 MARPOL Annex IV 5 12 7 Crew Certificates and Documents 4 7 7

Type of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013

Lifeboats 29 19 36 Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes 15 24 22 Ventilators, air pipes, casings 13 5 14 Oil filtering equipment 19 10 11 Fire-dampers 8 14 11 Emergency source of power-Emergency Generator 0 3 11 Embarkation arrangements survival craft 0 2 11 Fire prevention 9 8 10 Quick closing valves 8 10 8 Ventilation 5 3 7 Certificates for master and officers 0 5 7 Maintenance of the ship and equipment 10 6 6 Jacketed high pressure lines 6 6 6 Incinerator 2 0 6 Charts 1 4 6 Covers (hatchway-, portable-, tarpaulins, etc.) 1 2 6 Means of escape 0 3 6 Garbage 0 1 6

A total of 352 detainable deficiencies relating to 141 detentions were noted in 2013. (2.5 detainable deficiencies/detention)


24

2.4.2 Australia Table 2.4.2 Australia

Category of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013 ISM 45 36 24 Lifesaving Appliances 28 16 19 Fire Safety 19 16 14 Emergency Systems 6 6 14 Water/Weathertight conditions 6 9 10 Radio Communications 10 4 8 MARPOL Annex IV 6 8 6 Safety of Navigation 8 7 2


Development of plans for shipboard operations 20 17 14 Operational readiness of lifesaving appliances 22 13 11 Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes 5 3 9 Fire-dampers 10 7 6 Sewage treatment plant 6 7 6 MF/HF radio installation 4 3 5 Covers (hatchway-, portable-, tarpaulins, etc.) 2 2 5 Fixed fire extinguishing system 0 1 5 Other(ISM) 0 1 4 Launching arrangements for survival craft 0 0 4


2.4.3 Japan

Table 2.4.3 Japan Category of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013

ISM 9 11 10 Fire Safety 15 11 9 Emergency Systems 17 14 7 Lifesaving Appliances 9 5 7 Crew Certificates and Documents 2 3 4 Safety of Navigation 2 0 3 Water/Weathertight conditions 6 2 2 Other 1 1 2 Alarms 1 0 1 Structural Conditions 0 0 1


Fire drills 8 11 6 Resources and personnel 6 6 6 Lifeboats 2 2 5 Fixed fire extinguishing system 1 0 4



25

2.4.4 U.S.A. Table 2.4.4 U.S.A.

Category of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013 Fire safety 7 7 15 ISPS 2 0 12 ISM 10 4 4 MARPOL Annex VI 0 0 3


Fixed fire extinguishing system 0 0 10 Access control to ship 2 0 5 Other(Maritime security) 0 0 4 Electric equipment in general 0 1 2 Sulphur oxides 0 0 2 Ship security officer 0 0 2


2.4.5 India

Table 2.4.5 India Category of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013

Safety of Navigation 31 8 18 Emergency Systems 5 13 13 Fire Safety 23 16 9


Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes 1 10 8 Lifeboats 5 4 5 Nautical publication 4 1 5 Voyage data recorder(VDR) / S-VDR 7 2 4 Safe means of access Deck/Hold/Tank, etc. 0 0 4


2.4.6 Republic of Korea

Table 2.4.6 Republic of Korea Category of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013

Fire safety 4 8 9 ISM 3 5 9 Lifesaving Appliances 2 5 9


Launching arrangements for survival craft 0 0 5 Maintenance of the ship and equipment 2 4 4 Lifeboats 1 2 3



26

2.4.7 Indonesia Table 2.4.7 Indonesia

Category of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013 Fire Safety 19 17 11 Radio Communications 7 12 5 MARPOL Annex I 2 6 5 ISM 2 6 4


Fire-dampers 4 5 4 Lifeboats 1 3 3 Fire detection 0 2 3


2.4.8 Canada

Table 2.4.8 Canada Category of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013

Emergency Systems 0 2 6 Minimum requirements for seafarers 0 0 4 Pollution prevention 0 0 3


Emergency source of power-Emergency Generator 0 0 4 Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes 0 2 2


2.4.9 Russian Federation

Table 2.4.9 Russian Federation Category of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013

Lifesaving Appliances 5 4 8 Safety of Navigation 2 3 6 Fire Safety 1 6 5


Lifeboats 4 4 6 Fire detection 0 2 2 Magnetic compass 0 1 2 Voyage date recorder(VDR) / S-VDR 0 1 2



27

2.4.10 Italy Table 2.4.10 Italy

Category of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013 Safety of Navigation 0 0 15 Lifesaving Appliances 2 0 13 Fire Safety 4 1 12 ISM 3 1 8


ISM 1 1 6 Charts 0 0 6 Launching arrangements for survival craft 0 0 4 Auxiliary engine 0 0 4


2.4.11 Netherlands

Table 2.4.11 Netherlands Category of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013

Lifesaving Appliances 3 4 7 Fire Safety 3 0 7 Emergency Systems 2 0 5


ISM 0 1 3 Lifeboats 2 1 2 Fire-dampers 2 0 2 Emergency source of power-Emergency Generator 0 0 2



28

Chapter 3

Statistics & Analysis of ISM Deficiencies raised to NKSMC Ships This chapter is constructed based on the analysis result of Port State Control Inspection Reports which were collected in 2013. The contents of the records are available as “Monthly PSC Information” in “Safety Management Systems (ISM)”on ClassNK web-site ＜http://www.classnk.or.jp/＞. In this chapter, definition of the terms is as follows: NKSMC ship : Ship holding an International Safety Management Certificate issued by

ClassNK NKDOC company : Company holding a Document of Compliance issued by ClassNK ISM deficiency : Deficiency with safety management system related to the requirement

of ISM Code ISM deficiency case : Case where any ISM deficiency was recorded in PSC inspection report ISM deficiency rate* : Percentage of ISM deficiency cases to the whole NKSMC ships or a

group of NKSMC ships in consideration * Defining ISM deficiency rate as percentage of ISM deficiency cases to NKSMC ships that subjected to a PSC inspection is more meaningful. However, as the total number of such NKSMC ships is unknown, the total number of the whole or a group of NKSMC ships was used instead.

3. 1 Statistics of ISM deficiency cases 3.1.1 Total number and average rate The total number of ISM deficiency cases and the average ISM deficiency rates in the past 4 years are shown in Table 3.1.1.1. Since year 2010, the rate has been on the increase to 5.2% in year 2013.

Table 3.1.1.1 Total number and rate of ISM deficiency cases

Year

ISM deficiency

cases (A)

NKSMC ships

total No. （B）

ISM deficiency

rate （A/B）

2010 169 4212 4.0 2011 202 4505 4.5 2012 237 4677 5.1 2013 251 4868 5.2

3.1.2 Statistics of NKSMC Ships and ISM Deficiencies 3.1.2.1 Per Property of Ship (a) Per Type of Ship ISM deficiency rate per type of ship is shown in Table 3.1.2.1 (a) and Figure 3.1.2.1(a). The ISM deficiency rate of bulk carrier decreased 1.1% in 2013. The ISM deficiency rate of the other cargo ship and oil tanker decreased 0.3% in 2013,

respectively. The ISM deficiency rate of chemical tanker decreased to the level of 2011. The ISM deficiency rate of Gas carrier has been decreased to one-fifth of 2012.


29

There has been no report of ISM deficiency of passenger & MODU since 2010.

Table 3.1.2.1 (a) ISM deficiency rate per type of ship

ISM deficiency rate （％）（A/B）

Type of ship

No. of ISM deficiency

cases 2013 (A)

No. of NKSMC

ships 2013 (B)

2010

2011

2012

2013

Bulk carrier 119 2062 4.2 5.3 4.7 5.8 Other cargo ship 114 1783 4.8 5.1 6.7 6.4 Oil tanker＊ 15 759 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.0 Chemical tanker** 1 27 8.3 3.8 12.0 3.7 Gas carrier 2 232 1.8 2.6 4.5 0.9 Passenger & MODU 0 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 251 4868 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.2 * Including oil/chemical tankers. ** Excluding oil/chemical tanker.

Figure 3.1.2.1 (a) ISM deficiency rate per type of ship

ISM

def

icie

ncy

rate

(%)

Bulk carrier Other cargo ship Oil tanker Chemical tanker Gas carrier Passenger & MODU

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

2010

2011

2012

2013


30

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

0 ‐ 4 5 ‐ 9 10 ‐ 14 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐

2010

2011

2012

2013

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

0 ‐ 4 5 ‐ 9 10 ‐ 14 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐

Bulk carrier

Other cargo ship

Oil tanker

(b) Per Age of ship The numbers of ISM deficiency cases per age of ships in recent four years are shown in Table 3.1.2.1 (b) together with the number of NKSMC ships. Figure 3.1.2.1 (b)-1 shows ISM deficiency rates. Figure 3.1.2.1(b)-2 shows ISM deficiency rate per type and age of ship in 2013. Generally, the ship’s age and ISM deficiency rate are correlated. In 2013, the group of

the age 20-24 shows the highest rate, that is the same tendency in 2012. In 2013, “Bulk Carrier” of Age 20-24 shows a significantly higher deficiency rate than those of other ship types.

Table 3.1.2.1 (b) No. of ISM deficiency cases per age of ship

No. of ISM deficiency cases （A） No. of NKSMC ships （B） Age

2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 0 - 4 31 52 46 47 1671 1803 1865 1849 5 - 9 32 37 50 70 940 1064 1211 1391

10 - 14 39 47 44 38 773 744 670 652 15 - 19 27 39 56 53 381 463 529 602 20 - 24 16 16 24 26 210 218 193 204 25 - 24 11 17 17 237 213 209 170 Total 169 202 237 251 4212 4505 4677 4868

Figure 3.1.2.1 (b) -2 ISM deficiency rate (%) per ship type and age of ship

Figure 3.1.2.1 (b) -1 ISM deficiency rate per age of ship

ISM

def

icie

ncy

rate

(A/B

) (

%)

ISM

def

icie

ncy

rate

(A/B

) (

%)


31

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

0 ‐ 10 10 ‐ 20 20 ‐ 30 30 ‐ 40 40 ‐ 50 50 ‐ 60 60 ‐ 80 80 ‐

2010

2011

2012

2013

(c) Per Gross Tonnage of ship The numbers of ISM deficiency cases per ship’s gross-tonnage in recent four years are shown in Table 3.1.2.1(c) together with the number of NKSMC ships. Figure 1.2.1(c) shows ISM deficiency rate. The ISM deficiency rate of ships with GT “less than 10,000”, “20,000-30,000” and

“60,000-80,000” has decreased in 2013 but other groups’ are increased.

Table 3.1.2.1 (c) No. of ISM deficiency cases per ship’s GT

No. of ISM deficiency cases （A） No. NKSMC ships (B) GT （ x 1,000） 2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013

- 10 62 67 90 70 1134 1106 1083 1096 10 - 20 31 43 46 62 757 815 804 850 20 - 30 18 24 31 31 474 515 567 605 30 - 40 24 34 31 38 578 672 695 731 40 - 50 8 17 14 22 389 438 491 508 50 - 60 6 4 10 12 222 241 275 302 60 - 80 6 3 4 2 169 171 176 175 80 - 14 10 11 14 489 547 586 601 Total 169 202 237 251 4212 4505 4677 4868

Figure 3.1.2.1 (c) ISM deficiency rate per Ship’s GT GT ( x 1,000)

ISM

def

icie

ncy

rate

(A/B

) (

%)


32

(d) Per Nationality of ship ISM deficiency rate per nationality of ship from 2010 to 2013 is shown in Table 3.1.2.1 (d) together with the numbers of ISM deficiency cases. ISM deficiency rate of Panamanian ships is increasing gradually since 2010. ISM deficiency rate of Liberian increased in 2013. ISM deficiency rate of Japanese, Bahamas and Singaporean decreased in 2013.

Table 3.1.2.1 (d) ISM deficiency rate per Nationality of ship

2010 2011 2012 2013 Flag No. Rate No. Rate No. Rate No. Rate St. Kitts and Nevis

0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0

Philippines 3 6.8 4 9.1 4 8.5 5 11.9 Turkey 5 6.9 4 5.3 1 1.2 9 11.0 Thailand 5 9.4 5 8.8 5 7.8 7 10.0 Greece 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 9.1 Antigua and Barbuda

0 0.0 0 0.0 1 11.1 1 7.7

Malta 8 6.5 7 5.8 8 6.7 9 6.6 Liberia 4 2.1 11 5.1 7 3.1 14 6.2 Panama 97 4.1 126 5.1 143 5.6 151 5.8 H.K. (China) 9 3.9 9 3.6 13 5.0 14 4.9 Marshall Islands 7 5.0 9 4.6 9 3.7 13 4.7 Cyprus 4 6.9 3 4.7 1 1.7 3 4.6 Bahamas 2 1.8 1 0.9 5 4.2 4 3.5 Singapore 15 3.1 16 3.1 21 4.0 14 2.5 Vanuatu 3 6.5 2 4.2 5 11.1 1 2.1 Japan 4 2.3 3 1.6 9 4.4 3 1.4 Malaysia 2 6.1 1 2.6 3 7.9 0 0.0 St. Vincent and the Grenadines

1 7.1 1 9.1 1 12.5 0 0.0

Cook Islands 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 Total/Average 169 4.0 202 4.5 237 5.1 251 5.2


33

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

1‐ 5 6 ‐ 10 11 ‐ 15 16 ‐ 20 21 ‐ 30 31 ‐ 40 41 ‐ 50 51 ‐

3.1.2.2 Per Factors related to Company Note: The analysis presented in this section covers only NKSMC ships under the management of NKDOC Companies.

(a) Per Number of Ships under management by Company ISM deficiency rate per number of ships under a Company are shown in Table 3.1.2.2 (a) together with ISM deficiency rate. The group of 1-5 ships shows the highest ISM deficiency rate 7.5%. There shows a

tendency - more ships, lower deficiency rate. However, the ISM deficiency rate of the group of 41-50 ships shows 5.9%, that is an

exception of the above tendency.

Table 3.1.2.2(a) ISM deficiency rate per No. of ships under management of Company

No. of ships under

management

No. of Companies


cases (A)

No. of NKSMC ships

(B)

ISM deficiency

rate (A/B)

1 - 5 445 76 1020 7.5 6 - 10 97 42 736 5.7

11 - 15 47 37 617 6.0 16 - 20 29 17 521 3.3 21 - 30 25 29 605 4.8 31 - 40 12 15 433 3.5 41 - 50 9 24 407 5.9 51 - 6 11 529 2.1

Total 670 251 4868 5.2 Figure 3.1.2.2(a) ISM deficiency rate per No. of ships under management of Company

No. of ships under management of Company

ISM

def

icie

ncy

rate

(%)


34

(b) Per Country/Region where Company is located ISM deficiency rate per country/region where Company is located is shown in Table 3.1.2.2 (b) (together with the numbers of ISM deficiency cases) and in Figure 3.1.2.2 (b). The average ISM deficiency rate of ships under the management of Companies

located in Turkey, Greece, Korea and Hong Kong have increased from 7.7% (2012) to 9.4%, from 4.7 % to 8.4 %, from 6.4% to 7.2%, 2.7% to 3.3%, respectively.

In Taiwan and mainland China, the rate have decreased from 12.3％(2012) to 9.4%, from 6.5％ to 4.2％, respectively.

Table 3.1.2.2(b) ISM deficiency rate per country/region in which company are located

ISM deficiency rate (A/B) Country/Region No. of

Companies


cases (A)

No. of NKSMC ships

(B) 2012 2013

Norway 4 1 10 0.0 10.0 Netherlands 4 2 21 6.3 9.5 Turkey 54 18 191 7.7 9.4 Taiwan 18 19 202 12.3 9.4 U. A. E. 8 1 11 0.0 9.1 Thailand 7 7 79 8.6 8.9 Greece 110 30 359 4.7 8.4 Philippines 29 17 232 7.1 7.3 Korea 36 11 152 6.4 7.2 Canada 2 1 14 0.0 7.1 Japan 182 96 1833 5.5 5.2 China 58 8 190 6.5 4.2 Germany 7 2 55 0.0 3.6 H.K. (China) 16 11 334 2.7 3.3 Singapore 71 24 878 2.9 2.7 (Others) 64 3 307 2.3 1.0

Total 670 251 4868 5.1 5.2


35

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

Nor

way

Net

herla

nds

Turk

ey

Taiw

an

U. A

. E.

Thai

land

Gre

ece

Phili

ppin

es

Kore

a

Cana

da

Japa

n

Chin

a

Ger

man

y

H.K

. (Ch

ina)

Sing

apor

e

Figure 3.1.2.2 (b) Deficiency rate per country/region in which company are located

ISM

def

icie

ncy

rate

(%)


36

3.1.2.3 Per Port State The number of ISM deficiency cases per port state is shown in Table 3.1.2.3. The number of ISM deficiency cases in Japan, USA, Korea and Netherland has

decreased in 2013. The number of ISM deficiency cases in China, Indonesia, India, Germany and Russia

were similar to the ones in 2012. In the Paris MOU region, there shows a tendency of increasing. The number of ISM

deficiency cases in Italy, UK, Spain, France and Canada has increased in 2013.

Table 3.1.2.3 ISM deficiency case per Port State No. of ISM deficiency cases Authority 2010 2011 2012 2013

Australia 50 63 53 55 China 15 17 38 37 Japan 26 36 34 29 U.S.A. 11 22 23 20 Korea 6 5 15 12 Italy 3 4 3 11 Indonesia 2 8 9 8 U.K. 5 7 5 8 Spain 6 6 4 7 France 7 4 2 7 India 1 5 7 6 Germany 2 1 5 5 Netherlands 2 3 7 4 Russia 3 2 5 4 Canada 0 0 1 4 New Zealand 2 0 0 4 Singapore 0 1 5 3 Belgium 4 2 1 3 Poland 1 0 0 3 Gibraltar 0 0 0 3 Brazil 3 0 4 2 Chile 1 2 2 2 Bulgaria 0 1 0 2 Argentina 4 1 4 1 Greece 0 1 2 1 H.K. (China) 0 0 1 1 Viet Nam 2 3 0 1 Turkey 1 0 0 1 (Others) 12 8 7 7

Total 169 202 237 251


37

3.2 Analysis of ISM Deficiencies 3.2.1 Number of ISM deficiencies sorted by relevant ISM Code requirement The total number of ISM deficiencies recorded in PSC reports from 2010 to 2013 and the numbers sorted by the relevant ISM Code requirements (Section No.) are shown in Table 3.2.1.

Table 3.2.1 No. of ISM deficiencies sorted by relevant ISM Code requirement ISM Code requirements (Section No.) Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 99* Total

2010 0 6 14 1 12 26 46 23 10 87 11 4 3 1 244 2011 0 10 5 2 12 25 44 28 11 86 17 5 2 24 271 2012 0 9 10 0 10 56 76 26 17 96 12 7 2 4 325 2013 0 11 9 0 5 27 75 19 6 93 19 9 0 30 303

Note 1) Where PSCO did not specify ISM Code Section No. relevant to the ISM deficiency, ClassNK estimated it as far as possible.

2) 99* : Ones which did not or could not specify the relevant ISM Code Section No..

In 2013, in 251 cases, some ISM deficiencies were pointed out. The number of cases

was increased comparing with the number in 2012 (237 cases). On the other hand, total number of ISM deficiencies was decreased from 325 (2012) to 303. The average number of ISM deficiencies per ISM deficiency case was decreased to 1.21 (cf. 1.37 in 2012).

ISM deficiencies related to “Section 10 Maintenance of the ship and equipment” has been showing the highest percentage (abt. 30%).

The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to “Section 6 Resources and personnel” decreased from 17.2% to 8.9% and that of “Section 7 Shipboard operations” slightly increased from 23.4% to 24.7%.

The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to “Section 8 Emergency preparedness” decreased form 8.0% to 6.3%.

The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to “Section 9 Reports and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences” decreased from 5.2% to 2.0%.

For “Section 11 Documentation” and “12 Company verification, review and evaluation” the ratio were increased from 3.7% to 6.3% and 2.2% to 3.0%, respectively. Also, the ration of ISM deficiencies which could not specify the relevant Section Number was increased from 1.2% to 9.9%.

Section Requirements for 1 General (1.2.3 Compliance with mandatory rules, etc.) 2 Safety and environmental protection policy 3 Company responsibilities and authority 4 Designated persons 5 Master’s responsibility and authority 6 Resources and personnel 7 Shipboard operations 8 Emergency preparedness 9 Reports and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous

occurrences 10 Maintenance of the ship and equipment 11 Documentation 12 Company verification, review and evaluation 13 Certification and periodical verification


38

3.2.2 ISM Deficiencies and Detentions per Port State The number of ISM deficiencies and detentions per relevant ISM Code requirements and Port State are shown in Table 3.2.2.1. Bracketed numbers mean detentions. Table 3.2.2.1 No. of ISM deficiencies & detention per Port State & ISM Code requirements

ISM Code requirements (Section No.) Authority 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 99* Total

1 2 26 6 2 18 6 4 65 Australia (2) (15) (2) (2) (2) (23) 1 5 11 1 15 8 3 44 China (3) (4) (1) (5) (1) (1) (15) 2 9 7 3 3 10 1 35 Japan (2) (6) (8) 6 3 1 10 3 2 25 U.S.A. (2) (2) 5 4 7 2 1 19 Korea (1) (5) (1) (7) 1 8 2 11 Italy (3) (3) 1 1 4 3 9 U.K. (4) (3) (7) 1 1 1 3 3 9 Indonesia (1) (1) (1) (3) 2 4 3 6 14 5 1 25 7 2 17 86 (Others) 4 6 3 10 2 4 29

0 11 9 0 5 27 75 19 6 93 19 9 0 30 303 Total (0) (3) (0) (0) (0) (16) (25) (5) (0) (32) (4) (2) (0) (10) (97) ( ): Number of detention 99*: The ISM Code requirement by Section with which the deficiencies were raised was not specified. The largest number of ISM deficiencies was pointed out by PSC in Australia. The

numbers in China, Japan, U.S.A. and Korea follow it. Number of detention was the largest in Australia. The numbers in China, Japan, UK

and Korea follow it. As “detainable ISM deficiencies”, those related to “Section 10 Maintenance of the ship

and equipment” shows the largest number 32 and the highest ratio 33.0%. The ratios of “Section 7 Shipboard operations” and “Section 6 Resources and personnel” are 25.8% and 16.5%, respectively.


39

3.2.3 ISM Deficiencies and PSC Action Code Number of ISM deficiencies sorted by ISM Code requirements (Section No.) and PSC Action Code, is shown in Table 3.2.3.1. Distribution of the same per Action Code is shown in Figure 3.2.3.1.

Table 3.2.3.1 Distribution of ISM deficiencies per ISM Code requirement and PSC Action

PSC Action Codes1) 10 15 16 17 18 302) 40 50 99 -

ISM Code

Sect. No.

Total

Def

ic. r

ectif

ied

Def

ic. t

o be

rect

ified

by

next

por

t

Def

ic. t

o be

rect

ified

w

ithin

14

days

Def

ic. t

o be

rect

ified

be

fore

dep

artu

re

Def

ic. t

o be

rect

ified

w

ithin

3 m

onth

s

Gro

unds

for d

eten

tion

Def

ic. t

o be

rect

ified

be

fore

bac

k to

US

port

Def

ic. t

o be

rect

ified

w

ithin

30

days

Oth

ers

Unk

now

n

1 0 2 11 5 1 3 1 1 3 9 2 4 1 1 1 4 0 5 5 1 2 2 6 27 1 3 7 16 7 75 3 1 2 12 26 25 5 1 8 19 1 12 5 1 9 6 6 10 93 1 5 52 32 3 11 19 1 8 4 4 1 1 12 9 7 2 13 0

Unknown3) 30 1 4 13 11 1 G. Total 303 10 2 4 36 133 98 6 2 4 8

G. Total4) 325 5 0 8 51 124 110 10 5 9 3 Notes: 1) The Action Codes are those used under Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU, and USCG as follows.

Action Code 10, 15, 16, 17 and 30 are used under Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU and USCG Action Code 18 and 99 are used under Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU Action Code 40 and 50 are used under USCG. (In 2012, USCG abolished「40: Rectify

deficiencies within 7 days」and Code No. of「70: Rectify deficiencies to next US port after sailing foreign」was altered into 40.

2) The number of Action Codes 30 includes Action Code 19 “Rectify major non conformity before departure (Only for ISM defective items and always with a detainable deficiency)” used under Paris MOU, Vina Del Mar MOU, etc., not used under Tokyo MOU and USCG.

3) Related ISM Code requirement is not specified. 4) GT, Ground total. The data of 2012 were presented for comparison.


40

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

10 15 16 17 18 30 40 50 99

2012

2013

a) General For the ISM deficiencies found during PSC inspections, Action Code “18: Deficiency to

be rectified within 3 months” was applied most frequently (43.9%). Frequency of Code “30: Grounds for detention” was 32.8% and that of Code “17: Deficiency to be rectified before departure” was 11.9%.

The number of ISM Deficiencies resulted in “30: Grounds for detention” decreased from 110 (year 2012) to 98. Also, its percentage to the total number decreased from 33.8% (2012) to 32.3%.

In relation to ISM Code requirement, deficiencies with “Section 10 Maintenance of ship and equipment” were pointed out most frequently, and it is followed by “Section 7 Shipboard operations” (was the most frequent in 2012) and “Section 6 Resources and personnel”, “Section 8 Emergency preparedness”, “Section 11 Documentation”. The percentage of “Section 5 Master’s responsibility and authority” to the total

number of deficiencies decreased from 3.1% (2012) to 1.7%.

b) ISM Deficiency and its Objective Evidences ISM Code Section 6 Resources and personnel The number of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code Section 6 decreased to the half of 2012 and also its percentage decreased to 8.9%. Frequency of Action Code “30: Ground for detention” to the deficiencies related to this Section increased from 35.7% to 59.3%. Analysis of typical objective evidences is as follows: The findings of “Crew not familiar with fire drill including the usage of fireman’s outfit”, “Crew cannot start the engine of lifeboat or rescue boat”, “lack of communication between crew due to different nationalities of crew”, “Insufficient skills for smooth function tests of GMDSS or 15ppm alarm” often resulted in “30: Ground for detention”, then ISM related deficiency was additionally pointed out in many cases. “Fire doors tied opened at the entrances of Galley, E/R or other spaces”, “Crew not familiar with function tests of fire alarm/ steering gear alarm “, “Insufficient knowledge of on-load release mechanism,” etc. were also pointed out as one of the objective evidences of ISM deficiency.

ISM Code Section 7 Shipboard operations The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code Section 7 increased from 23.4% (2012) to 24.8%. Frequency of Action Code “30: Ground for detention” to the deficiencies

Action Code

Figure 3.2.3.1 Distribution of ISM deficiencies per Action Code

No.

of I

SM d

efic

ienc

ies


41

related to this Section decreased from 44.7% to 33.3%. Analysis of typical objective evidences is as follows: “Obstacles in front of fire hose box or on emergency escape route”, “Lifeboat etc. not ready for immediate use”, “Insufficient skills to operate fixed fire extinguishing system”, “Malfunctioned sewage treatment unit”, “Non-separated plastic or other garbage” often resulted in “30: Ground for detention”, then ISM related deficiency was additionally pointed out in many cases. “Not familiar with the operation of lifeboat and rescue boat”, “No execution of abandon ship drill”, “Insufficient record of crew’s rest or working hours”, “Lack of voyage planning”, “Chart & nautical publication not updated”, “Wrong storage condition and record of garbage, etc. were also pointed out as one of the objective evidences of ISM deficiency. ” ISM Code Section 8 Emergency preparedness The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code Section 8 decreased from 8.0% (2012) to 6.3%. Frequency of Action Code “30: Ground for detention” to the deficiencies related to this Section increased from 46.2% to 63.2%. Analysis of typical objective evidences is as follows: As a result of drills required by PSC Officer, “Lack of the skills as duty officer”, “Lifeboat cannot be lowered”, “Improper usage of Fireman’s outfit”, “Malfunctioned fire alarm and its sensors” were considered as lack of emergency preparedness and resulted in “30: Ground for detention”, then ISM related deficiency was additionally pointed out in many cases. “Insufficient knowledge for the use of Lifeboat equipment (radar reflector, search light, etc.)”, “oily rags or other burnable left near furnaces or heated parts”, “Insufficient lighting for embarkation spaces for lifeboats and rescue boats”, “Crew not knowing the position of isolation valve on fire main line”, “Crew not wearing safety shoes, suits and helmets”, “Taking too long time to wear fireman’s outfit”, etc. were also pointed out as one of the objective evidences of ISM deficiency. ISM Code Section 9 Reports and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code 9 decreased to 2.0%. Deficiencies such as “Damage or malfunction of equipment, etc., had not been reported to the company”, “Company do not respond to the deficiency reported from ship”, “No corrective action taken for the deficiency pointed out during the previous PSC inspection”, etc. were pointed out. They were counted as ISM related deficiency itself or objective evidence of ISM related deficiency case by case. There found the cases where there was no reporting specified in SOLAS Chapter 1 Part B Regulation 11 “Maintenance of condition after survey” (c) to Flag Government, Classification Society, Port Authority, etc., regarding the deficiencies with steering gear, generator engine and other important equipment, it was pointed out as ISM related deficiency.

ISM Code Section 10 Maintenance of the ship and equipment The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code 10 has increased to 30.7%. Frequency of Action Code “18: Deficiency to be rectified within 3 months” were 55.9% (41.8% in 2012) and Action Code “30: Ground for detention” 34.4% (30.2% in 2012), “17: Deficiency to be rectified before departure” 5.4% (17.7% in 2012). That is to say frequencies of Action Codes 18 & 30 have increased and that of Code 17 have decreased. For the technical deficiencies which were pointed out as objective evidences of ISM Code


42

Section 10- related deficiency, Action Code “30: Ground for detention” or “17: Deficiency to be rectified before departure” were applied. Analysis of typical objective evidences is as follows: (a) Hull structure and Hatch cover, etc.

Corroded or fractured hold frames and brackets, Wasted hatch cover packing and cleat, Wasted or deformed watertight/ weather tight doors

(b) Main & aux. engines, Machinery and Equipment Oil leaks, Broken pressure gauges, Malfunctioned sewage treatment unit, oil filtering unit & 15ppm alarm, Windlass/ winch brake lining worn-down, Corroded or holed sea water piping, Broken self-closing device of FO tank sounding pipe head, Malfunctioned FO tank quick closing device, Malfunctioned emergency generator

(c) Navigation & Radio Equipment Malfunctioned VDR, AIS, Echo-sounder, Radar, GMDSS, Magnet compass, Navigation light. Dropped emergency power source for GMDSS, Overdue or missing records of VDR annual maintenance

(d) Life Saving Apparatus Lifeboat- Engine not started (incl. dropped starter battery), damaged hull and outfitting, missed or expired equipment/ accessory Launching appliance- No-good condition of on-load release gear, boat falls & hanging device and davit Insufficient maintenance of Life buoy, Radar transponder

(e) Fire Safety System Insufficient maintenance of main & emergency fire pumps, Tied-opened or not self- closing fire doors, Corroded or holed piping, Insufficient maintenance of fire dampers, fireman’s outfit & SCBA, Leaking Hydrant

(f) Ventilators and Air Pipes Corroded or holed coaming or vent/ pipe head. Corroded or broken closing device.

Examples of PSC inspection report issued in Australia, China, France, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea and U.S.A. in 2013 are shown in the Appendix, for introduction of typical PSC cases where ISM deficiencies were raised with objective evidences i.e, other deficiencies of ship’s structure & equipment, crew license, etc.


43

Appendix: Sample of PSC inspection reports

Samples of reports of PSC inspections carried out in Australia, China, France, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea and U.S.A. in 2013 are given in the Appendix below showing the descriptions of ISM deficiencies together with relevant deficiencies on ship constructions, equipment, etc. (Abbreviations used in the table) “DEF_CD”: Deficiency Code, “ACT_CD: Action Code”

1. AUSTRALIA

CASE DEF_CD DEF_ITEM NATURE_OF_DEFICIENCY ACT_CD

1 05105 MF/HF radio installation MF/HF Radio Defective. 30

05118 Operation of GMDSS

equipment

Unable to demonstrate operation of DSC

test call to coaster radio station with MF/HF

Radio running on GMDSS Reserve Batteries.

17

04114 Emergency source of

power - Emergency

Generator

Back-up batteries bank for bridge equipment

in deteriorated condition. (electrode plates

cracks/deformed & casing top cracked)

17

10116 Nautical publications Sailing direction NP34 (2009 5th Edition) for

intended voyage not current edition.

( Indonesia Pilot Vol. II )

17

14402 Sewage treatment plan Sewage Treatment Plant defective. 30

13107 Other (machinery) Aux. Oil Fired Boiler protective alarm panel

lights mostly defective.

17

10106 Compass correction log Gyro compass error & standard compass

deviation log not maintained as per STCW

Watch keeping Requirements.

99

03103 Railing, gangway, walkway

and means for safe

passage

Portable stanchions and lifeline between

accommodation & fwd. work station on main

deck not maintained.

17

14104 Oil filtering equipment Oily water separator automatic waste oil

discharge arrangement defective.

17

18412 Personal equipment Proper personal protective equipment

(Goggle and Mask) not provided on board for

cargo dust.

99

01315 Oil record book Oil record book not of MARPOL Annex

current edition.

17

11101 Lifeboats Starboard lifeboat manual bilge pump rubber

diaphragm with many surface crack.

17

14405 Other (MARPOL Annex

IV)

3-way rotary valve for hospital sewage&

drain line to sewage plant stuck open.

15

07123 Operation of Fire

Protection Systems

Power supply to bridge fire detection system

turned off.

17

13101 Propulsion main engine Main engine jacket cooling system shown

signs of external leak below thick paint /

sealant.

15

10119 Rudder angle indicator Starboard bridge wing rudder angle indicator

glass cracked.

16

14611 Ozone depleting

substances

Records & measures for minimize pollution

from shipboard ozone depleting substance

(HCFC-22) from ref. plant not maintained.

15


44

15109 Maintenance of the ship

and equipment

Ref. to above deficiencies

#1,3,6,7,8,10,11,&16, there are objective

evidence that the company SMS is not

effective.

18

2 10111 Charts Out dated Chart AUS235, etc. used for the

voyage to Brisbane; BA Chart 4635 and AUS

Chart 815, 816 not onboard.

17

04110 Abandon ship drills Life boat drill not carried out as per SOLAS

requirements. No drill records for life boat

water borned of the last 6 month was found.

15

06107 Cargo operation Ship/shore safety check list not signed by

terminal representative.

17

07112 Emergency Escape

Breathing Device and

disposition

Two air bottles for SCBA pressure low. 17

07120 Means of escape Gym apparatus in way of Escape route. 17

03108 Ventilators, air pipes,

casings

APT air pipe defective. 17

09229 Winches and capstans Mooring lines (Fwd.) on drums. 17

07110 Fire fighting equipment

and appliances

Hyper- L P water pump set at manual. 17

15106 Development of plans for

shipboard operations

The SMS does not ensure effective

implementation of procedure and

instructions for key shipboard operations.

30

3 11102 Lifeboat inventory Stb'd Lifeboat: magnetic compass defective. 17

11101 Lifeboats Stb'd Lifeboat: primary starting system

defective.

17


casings

Stb'd Side main deck: rubber packing for

vent flap for stevedore toilet defective.

17

03115 Other (load lines) Forward bosun store: port side bilge valve

defective.

17

07112 Emergency Escape

Breathing Device and

disposition

EEBD in E/R workshop with low pressure. 17

07108 Readily availability of fire

fighting equipment

SCBA in fire station not readily available. 17

03115 Other (load lines) Water in bilges & on deck in conveyor belt

room forward.

17

11132 Maintenance and

inspection

Port Lifeboat: passenger's seats damaged. 17

17102 Other (SOLAS

operational)

Master failed to report defective navigational

equipment to class/port state/flag state

authority.

17

11129 Operational readiness of

lifesaving appliances

Port Lifeboat: release gear defective. 30


and equipment

All above deficiencies are objective evidence

that SMS as implemented on board failed to

ensure that the vessel is effectively

maintained.

18


45

2.CHINA


4 10111 Charts BA chart No.1604 not updated. 17


and equipment

BNWAS not consider as critical equipment

included in maintenance record book.

18


and equipment

PV testing for INMARSAT station (included

lRIT 435635010) not carried out from Dec.

10 2012.

18

11112 Launching arrangements

for survival craft

Means of testing freefall L/B release system

without launching L/B not provided.

17


and equipment

No proper testing means for heat detectors

of fire detectors (located in E/R, galley room

etc.) not proper be periodically tested.

18

5 01320 Garbage record book Corrective method for Garbage record book

- Not proceeded properly.

99

10127 Voyage or passage plan Voyage plan (from Singapore to Dalian) - No

Chief Officer's signature.

17

04109 Fire drills Fire drill's record - Not proceeded properly. 99

04109 Fire drills Communication equipments in fire drill - Not

checked.

99

04109 Fire drills Subsequent procedure of abandoning ship in

fire drill - Not proceeded.

99

05106 INMARSAT ship earth

station

INMARSAT-C - Not tested timely. 17

05105 MF/HF radio installation No evidence show duty officers have made a

test for NBDP.

17

05118 Operation of GMDSS

equipment

Key crew not familiar with the operation of

NBDP.

17

07110 Fire fighting equipment

and appliances

Fire hose in engine room aft main engine -

Exceed 15m.

17

07105 Fire doors/openings in

fire-resisting divisions

Self-closing device for the fire door between

engine room and steering gear room - Need

adjusted.

17

07117 Jacketed high pressure

lines

High pressure fuel oil leakage alarm system

for main engine -Malfunction.

30


and equipment

Deficiencies mentioned above as evidences

show that operation of SMS on board -

Failure.

30

11118 Lifejackets incl. provision

and disposition

Light for the lifejacket in engine control room

- Malfunctioned.

17


46

3. FRANCE


6 01101 Cargo Ship Safety

Equipment (including

Exemption)

Window for second annual survey expired. 30

10104 Gyro compass Gyrocompass inoperative. (ISM) 30

07125 Evaluation of Crew

Performance (fire drill)

Last fire drill performed the 14th August

2013 (More than 1 month). (ISM)

30

15107 Emergency preparedness Fireman breathing apparatus not ready to

use (10 minutes to open the bottle).

30



Self closing device of 2 fire doors in

staircase and 1 between E/R and Steering

Gear room inoperative. (ISM)

30

11117 Lifebuoys incl. provision

and disposition

MOB Lifebuoys on bridge wings damaged.

(ISM)

-

04103 Emergency lighting,

batteries and switches

Several emergency lights on deck

inoperative. (ISM)

17

15150 ISM Internal audit and corrective action is

required within 3 months. Deficiencies marks

ISM are objective evidence of the ISM Code.

18

09127 Cleanliness Galley floor and filters of cooker extraction

hood dirty.

-

4. INDIA

CASE DEF_C

D

DEF_ITEM NATURE_OF_DEFICIENCY ACT_CD

7 10130 Other (navigation) AIS/VDR annual performance test is due, as

last annual performance test was done on 11

September 2012.

17

11101 Lifeboats Life Boat (P&S) Annual servicing test done

on 09/2012.

17

07110 Fire fighting equipment and

appliances

Portable fire extinguisher last hydro pressure

test record not available.

17

13101 Propulsion main engine E/R emergency stop from ECR not tried out. 17

15107 Emergency preparedness Damage stability booklet not available. 17

14118 Other (MARPOL/Annex I) Garbage record book overwritten. 17

14305 Other (MARPOL Annex III) Oil record book overwritten. 17

10111 Charts Vessel using Indian chart, no updates

available for BA chart of the same area.

17

08111 Other (alarms) Span gas not available on board for

calibration of portable gas equipment.

17

08111 Other (alarms) Vessel does not have personal gas

measuring equipment.

17


casings

Air vent rubber packing (Goose neck)

observed damaged.

17

05111 Satellite EPIRB 406

MHz/1.6 GHz

Performance test and servicing of EPIRB

carried out on 09/2012.

17


47

5.INDONESIA

CASE DEF_C

D


8 16105 Access control to ship ISPS not conducted properly. 99

10116 Nautical publications NTM not update. 17

05113 Radar transponder SART can't be detected by radar. 17

10111 Charts Chart correction not update. 17

10127 Voyage or passage plan Passage plan not recorded properly. 99

05115 Radio log (diary) GMDSS radio log book not recorded since

October 2012.

99

10106 Compass correction log Compass correction book not update. 99

10116 Nautical publications IMDG Code old edition. 17

10116 Nautical publications SOLAS consolidated not available on board . 17

10114 Voyage data recorder

(VDR)/Simplified Voyage

date recorder (S-VDR)

VDR showing error. 30

15105 Resources and personnel All deck officers not familiar operating

MF/HF DSC.

30

11104 Rescue boats Ships identification of rescue boat not visible

from above.

17

09201 Ventilation (Working

spaces)

Stb'd E/R ventilation defective. 30

13103 Gauges, thermometers, etc. Exhaust gas temperature indicator on panel

control engine side missing.

16



Escape trunk fire door hold by wire. 17

14608 Incinerator Manual instruction operating incinerator

N/A.

17

14608 Incinerator Incinerator abnormal. 30

14104 Oil filtering equipment OWS piping diagram not posted. 17

14104 Oil filtering equipment OWS solenoid valve not operating normally. 30

09208 Protection machinery Eye protector grinding machine N/A. 17

07117 Jacketed high pressure

lines

High pressure FO line Emergency generator

engine N/A.

17

07114 Means of control (opening,

pumps, ventilation, etc.)

Machinery spaces

Quick closing valve DO service tank not

ready to use.

17



Machinery spaces

Emergency air tank low level. 17

08107 Machinery controls alarm Engine telegraph indicator light out of order. 17



Machinery spaces

Safety valve economizer not fitted properly. 17

01134 Other (certificates) OWS certificate not available. 17

01308 Records of rest Crew work/rest hour period record N/A. 99

09112 Medical equipment Alcohol tester not available. 17


48

6. JAPAN

CASE DEF_C

D


9 15106 Development of plans for


Non-compliance with mandatory rules &

regulations for the safe operation, new

edition charts were not onboard, voyage plan

was not appropriately planed, be using many

not up to date charts.

30

10127 Voyage or passage plan Not adequately planed with many not up to

date chart.

17

10111 Charts Charts for intended voyage: absence of new

edition’s charts. (13 sheets)

30

14503 Garbage management plan Garbage not separated according to garbage

management plan.

17

14503 Garbage management plan Not up-to-date. (not conformed to

MARPOL)

17

11117 Lifebuoys incl. provision and

disposition

Lifeline of lifebuoy at boat deck stb’d side:

not no-kinking type.

16

07123 Operation of Fire

Protection Systems

HFO settling tank & service tank: drain

valves secured open.

17

07101 Fire prevention structural

integrity

Self-closing fire door between E/R and

steering gear room: kept open by the rope

17

04110 Abandon ship drills Crew not familiar with how to put on

immersion suit.

17

10 04109 Fire drills The crew were unable to demonstrate

proficiently in performing a satisfactory fire

drill.

30

15105 Resources and personnel Senior officer were not aware of their tasks,

duties and responsibilities as evident by the

above deficiency.

30

14601 Technical files and if

applicable, monitoring

manual

Engineer didn't know how to maintain the

engine for main propulsion and auxiliary in

accordance with NOx technical code. This

ship missing Nox technical files.

17

11108 Inflatable liferafts Both side liferafts: Not readily transferred for

launching to each side of the ship.

17



Fire doors of stair case: Kept in open

position.

17

10111 Charts Chart for intended voyage: absence of

corrected navigational charts, the vessel is

using the out dated charts. (W126, W1106)

17


49

7. KOREA

CASE DEF_C

D


11 10118 Speed and distance

indicator

Speed log indicated -3.5kt in Inchon inner

harbor.

17

10130 Other (navigation) BNWAS reset switch located in bridge chart

room not providing proper look out.

17

07110 Fire fighting equipment and

appliances

Some fire hoses in machinery space more

than 15m.

17

03115 Other (load lines) A cable penetrated ACC. Area between

ACC. Space and open deck.

17

15105 Resources and personnel C/O cannot demonstrate how to operate gas

detector.

18

12 01104 Cargo Ship Safety Radio

(including Exemption)

SR annual survey overdue. 30

17102 Other (SOLAS operational) IMO number inside marking not in

accordance with requirement.

17

07122 Fire control plan Fire Control Plan not made with IMO

symbols.

16


and equipment

In related to deficiency of SR Certificate,

maintenance of ship not satisfactory in view

of ISM code.

30

8. U.S.A.

CASE DEF_C

D


13 07108 Readily availability of fire

fighting equipment

Vessel is required to have Four Fire-Fighting

suits only three are in good working order.

Maintenance records by crew state all fire

suits are good working order.

17

14501 Garbage Vessel had plastic, paper and grease mix

with food waste ready to be discharged

overboard according to ships garbage

management plan containers are not marked

properly, it is also believed that paper food

plastic, has been discharged into the sea.

10

16105 Access control to ship The ladder for talking Draft reading was

down on the Starboard side for

approximately 3 hours. Excess keys were

located in the engine control room and Crew

specific duties in regards to security were

found posted throughout the Vessel.

10

15101 Safety and environmental

policy

Sediment documentation is not being

recorded, discussed bio-fouling, VGP

requirements with Captain, Chief officer and

Chief Engineer.

10

15101 Safety and environmental

policy

Expired PYRO Technics, batteries and 4x20L

containers of kerosene were found in various

accommodations spaces. Believe safety

officer has not followed or understands the

basic reasoning behind ISM objective.

10

14 13108 Operation of machinery Rudder shifts 4 degrees port and stbd while

operating the steering gears at follow up

mode.

17


50

15104 Masters responsibility and

authority

If the vessel's primary steering gear stops

operating properly, the person directing the

movement of the vessel must report it to the

nearest captain of the port.

10

15 13100 Propulsion and Auxiliary

Machinery

The following Pipes were patches.

1. Atmosphere Condenser Pipe

2. M/E F/W Cooler - S/W Outlet Pipe

3. #1 Condenser S/W Pipe to Refer

17

02110 Beams, frames, floors -

operational damage

Under deck area in Steering Flat has several

Stiffeners that are bent.

17

07111 Personal equipment for fire

safety

2 of 4 Fireman Outfits were damaged. 17


and equipment

Stretcher has a damaged. 17

17100 Other Vessel is mixed Gray and Black water

together and maybe killing the bacteria built

up in the MSD.

40

11133 Other (life saving) Portside Muster Station in the vicinity of

Survival Craft missing signs for Lifeboat and

Liferaft.

10

14104 Oil filtering equipment The Oily Water Separator has 4 patches on

various Pipes.

17

07106 Fire detection Ship does not have Test Kit for the Heat and

Flame Detectors.

17

14201 Efficient stripping A/C Vent is holed, which will allow air to

continue to flow when system is stopped.

17

15106 Development of plans for


Vessel has conflicting Ballast Plans and

SOLAS Training Manuals.

40

17100 Other No BIO Fouling Plan onboard vessel. 40


51

Chapter 4

Statistical Data from Tokyo MOU and Paris MOU Several regional MOUs and Port States publicly announce their PSC data on their websites and publish Annual Reports every year. Based on these public data available, this Chapter introduces abstracts of the recent results of detentions by the Tokyo MOU and the Paris MOU in 2013. The full text of each respective Annual Report can be obtained from the following websites.

Tokyo MOU http://www.tokyo-mou.org Paris MOU http://www.parismou.org


52

4.1 Tokyo MOU In 2013, 31,018 inspections were carried out in the Tokyo MOU region, and 1,395 ships were detained due to serious deficiencies found onboard. 4.1.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities Table 4.1.1 shows the numbers of Port State inspections carried out by each Port State from 2011 through 2013.

Table 4.1.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Port Authorities (Tokyo MOU)

No. of Inspection No. of Detentions Detention ratio (%) Authority 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013

Australia 3,002 3,179 3,342 275 210 233 9.16 6.61 6.97 Canada 1) 325 487 416 8 7 9 2.46 1.44 2.16 Chile 861 907 896 28 16 17 3.25 1.76 1.90 China 7,821 8,321 8,078 678 596 659 8.67 7.16 8.16 Fiji 33 28 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hong Kong, China 746 743 740 25 34 40 3.35 4.58 5.41 Indonesia 2,150 2,673 2,784 77 67 35 3.58 2.51 1.26 Japan 5,076 5,193 5,365 217 237 199 4.28 4.56 3.71 Republic of Korea 2,070 2,350 2,214 126 113 109 6.09 4.81 4.92 Malaysia 848 892 898 13 12 17 1.53 1.35 1.89 Marshall Islands 1) 1 0 0 New Zealand 479 476 329 12 16 7 2.51 3.36 2.13 Papua New Guinea 102 70 106 3 0 5 2.94 0 4.72 Philippines 1,812 2,004 2,128 4 3 4 0.22 0.15 0.19 Russian Federation 2) 1,136 1,081 972 25 28 15 2.20 2.59 1.54 Singapore 740 779 782 29 44 22 3.92 5.65 2.81 Thailand 333 456 499 6 1 3 1.80 0.22 0.06 Vanuatu 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vietnam 1,093 1,290 1,438 36 37 21 3.29 2.87 1.46

Total 28,627 30,929 31,018 1,562 1,421 1,395 5.46% 4.59% 4.50%

1) Data for the Marshall Islands is only for November and December 2013. 2) Data is only for the Pacific ports.


53

4.1.2 Black List of Flag States Table 4.1.2 shows the Black List of Flag State announced in the Tokyo MOU Annual Report.

Table 4.1.2 Black List of Flag States (Tokyo MOU)

Flag State No. of

Inspections 2011-2013

No. of Detentions 2011-2013

Black to Grey limit

Black to Grey limit

Tanzania 73 18 9

Korea, Democratic People’s Republic 593 110

52

Papua New Guinea 39 10 6 Sierra Leone 764 131 66 Cambodia 4,996 767 380 Mongolia 408 70 38 Indonesia 531 79 47 Georgia 42 9 6 Tonga 36 8 6 Bangladesh 137 18 15 Kiribati 614 64 54 St. Kitts & Nevis 126 16 14 Thailand 959 86 81 Vietnam 2,290 192 181 Belize 1,184 103 98


54

4.1.3 Detentions by Recognized Organizations Table 4.1.3 and Figure 4.1.3 show the detention data of IACS affiliated Recognized Organization in the Tokyo MOU Annual Report. Table 4.1.3 Inspections and Detentions per Recognized Organization (Tokyo MOU) (*1)

Recognized Organization

No. of Inspections 2011-2013

No. of Detentions 2011-2013

No. of RO responsible detentions

Detention ratio (%)

RO responsible detention ratio (%)

ABS 9,118 268 14 2.94 0.15

BV 9,417 418 15 4.44 0.16

CCS 8,126 81 1 1.00 0.01

DNV 10,524 283 10 2.69 0.10

GL 9,489 432 20 4.55 0.21

KR 8,115 141 1 1.74 0.01

LR 11,311 361 11 3.19 0.10

NK 28,105 1,005 46 3.58 0.16

RINA 2,239 105 1 4.69 0.04

RS 1,462 93 2 6.36 0.14 (*1) According to the Tokyo MOU annual report, in cases where a ship’s certificates were issued

by more than one recognized organization (RO), the number of inspections would be counted towards both of organizations, while the number of detentions would be counted only towards the RO that issued the certificate relating to the detainable deficiency or deficiencies.

図 4.1.3 Detention Ratio by Recognized Organization (Tokyo MOU)

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%

ABS BV CCS DNV GL KR LR NK RINA RS

Det

entio

n ra

tio

DetentionRO responsibility


55

4.1.4 Deficiencies by Category Figure 4.1.4 shows the number of deficiencies by category for the three years from 2011 through 2013.

図 4.1.4 Deficiencies per Category (Tokyo MOU)

35,826

8,257

8,139

12,281

17,435

18,114

36,976

3,292

3,593

6,753

12,070

17,124

20,522

37,433

3,511

5,899

11,507

16,275

17,539

3,497

3,099

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000

Others

ISM related deficiencies

Stability, structure andrelated equipment

Load lines

Life saving appliances

Safety of navigation

Fire safety measures

Deficiencies

2013

2012

2011


56

4.2 Paris MOU In 2013, 17,687 inspections were carried out in the Paris MOU region, and 668 ships were detained due to serious deficiencies found onboard. 4.2.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities Table 4.2.1 shows the numbers of Port State Inspections carried out by each respective Port State from 2011 through 2013.

Table 4.2.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities (Paris MOU)

No. of Inspections No. of Detentions Detention ratio (%) Authority 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013

Belgium 971 1,068 1,003 11 13 21 1.13 1.22 2.10 Bulgaria 552 567 536 24 25 20 4.35 4.41 3.70 Canada 895 983 890 34 27 33 3.80 2.75 3.70 Croatia 269 223 200 12 5 13 4.46 2.24 6.50 Cyprus 127 103 100 10 6 8 7.87 5.83 8.00 Denmark 400 334 379 2 4 3 0.50 1.20 0.80 Estonia 196 169 151 1 1 1 0.51 0.59 0.70 Finland 316 283 294 2 1 3 0.63 0.35 1.00 France 1,253 1,233 1,305 38 45 41 3.03 3.65 3.10 Germany 1,411 1,208 1,325 37 46 29 2.62 3.81 2.20 Greece 1,015 1,164 1,027 54 42 49 5.32 3.61 4.80 Iceland 63 70 63 1 0 2 1.59 0.00 3.20 Ireland 242 285 313 14 21 23 5.79 7.37 7.30 Italy 1,707 1,468 1,420 114 110 131 6.68 7.49 9.20 Latvia 246 267 204 1 2 1 0.41 0.75 0.50 Lithuania 185 173 160 1 5 4 0.54 2.89 2.50 Malta 237 176 190 10 12 17 4.22 6.82 8.90 Netherlands 1,604 1,531 1,496 55 36 57 3.43 2.35 3.80 Norway 615 572 609 8 11 9 1.30 1.92 1.50 Poland 432 425 376 12 17 12 2.78 4.00 3.20 Portugal 448 424 400 8 4 9 1.79 0.94 2.30 Romania 776 728 747 17 16 16 2.19 2.20 2.10 Russian Fed. 1) 1,039 951 822 24 29 37 2.31 3.05 4.50 Slovenia 240 199 185 29 6 12 12.08 3.02 6.50 Spain 1,794 1,668 1,554 122 117 63 6.80 7.01 4.10 Sweden 421 493 398 5 5 3 1.19 1.01 0.80 United Kingdom 1,604 1,543 1,540 42 63 51 2.62 4.08 3.30

Total 19,058 18,308 17,687 688 669 668 3.61% 3.65% 3.78%

1) Only movements to the Russian ports in the Baltic Azov, Caspian and Barents Sea are included


57

4.2.2 Black List of Flag States Table 4.2.2 shows the Black List of Flag States announced by the Paris MOU.

Table 4.2.2 Black List of Flag States (Paris MOU)

Flag State Inspections 2011-2013

Detentions 2011-2013

Black to

Grey Limit

Tanzania, United Republic of 289 53 High Risk 28

Honduras 30 7 5

Dominica 103 18 12

Togo 282 37

Medium to High Risk

27

Moldova, Republic of 611 73 54

Sierra Leone 355 42 33

Cook Islands 240 29 24

Comoros 350 37 33

St. Vincent and the Grenadines 1,004 87 84

Cambodia 526 47

Medium Risk

47


58

4.2.3 Deficiencies by Category Figure 4.2.3 shows the number of deficiencies by category for the three years from 2011 through 2013.

Fig. 4.2.3 Deficiencies per Category (Paris MOU)

36

125

0

332

253

0

578

602

464

358

347

1101

1318

1704

1644

2313

2597

1952

2808

2951

3046

3491

4782

5252

6591

6528

29

0

98

0

319

324

0

485

570

398

449

303

1005

1127

1476

1736

2182

2121

2029

2216

2442

2856

3297

4393

5067

7488

6816

30

100

258

329

341

390

401

424

490

492

889

1013

1060

1301

1821

1946

2111

2184

2202

2710

2754

3069

4526

4579

6657

6861

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000

MARPOL ANNEX II

Working and Living Conditions (MLC,2006)*: MLC,2006 Title2

Dangeous goods


Cargo operations including equipment

MARPOL Annex IV


ISPS

Other

Alarms

MARPOL Annex VI

MARPOL Annex Ⅴ

Certif icate & Document: Crew Certif icate

MARPOL ANNEX I

Radio communications

ISM

Working and Living Conditions (ILO147)**: Living Conditions

Water/Weathertight conditions

Emergency Systems

Structural Conditions

Propulsion and auxiliary machinery

Certif icate & Document: Ship Certif icate

Certif icate & Document: Documents

Life saving appliances

Working and Living Conditions (ILO147)**: Working Conditions

Fire safety

Safety of Navigation

Deficiencies

20132012

2011


59

4.2.4 Recognized Organization Performance Table Table 4.2.4 shows the PSC performance of IACS affiliated Recognized Organizations among those announced by the Paris MOU for the three years from 2011 through 2013.

Table 4.2.4 Recognized Organization Performance Table (Paris MOU) Recognized Organization

Inspections 2011-2013

Detentions 2011-2013

Medium / High limit

Performance Level

LR 11,405 10 203

ABS 5,323 4 89

DNV 10,382 9 184

CCS 746 0 8

NK 6,584 18 112

RINA 2,895 7 45

BV 11,217 35 199

GL 12,850 45 230

KR 825 1 9

RS 4,338 18 71

PRS 513 3 5

High

CRS 173 0 0

IRS 99 0 0 MEDIUM

Port State Control Annual Report [English]

4-7, Kioi-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8567, JAPAN Tel: +81-3-5226-2027, -2028 Fax: +81-3-5226-2029 E-mail: [email protected]

www.classnk.com August 2014

ClassNK Survey Operations Headquarters