atlas copco q3/2010 results

28
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, 2010

Upload: atlas-copco-ab

Post on 29-May-2015

374 views

Category:

Education


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Atlas Copco Group

Q3 Results

October 22, 2010

Page 2: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Q3 - highlights

Strong order growth – Sequentially higher volumes in all regions and in most customer segments

– Record order intake, again, in Asia, South America and Australia

– Strong performance in aftermarket

Record operating profit and margin– Revenue volume, sales mix, price, and efficiency measures gave support

Investments in market organization and logistics

October 22, 20102

Page 3: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Q3 - figures in summary

35% organic order growth

Revenues of MSEK 17 743; 18% organic growth

Operating profit at MSEK 3 782 (2 402)– Restructuring cost of MSEK 100

– Adjusted operating margin of 21.9% (15.9)

Profit before tax at MSEK 3 675 (2 210)

Basic earnings per share SEK 2.17 (1.42)

Operating cash flow MSEK 2 479 (4 275)

3October 22, 2010

Page 4: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Orders received - local currencyGroup total +33% YTD (+31% excl. cancellations), +37% last 3 monthsStructural change +2% YTD, +2% last 3 months

September 2010

18 +51 +49

A = Share of orders received, year-to-date, %

B = Year-to-date vs. previous year, %

C = Last 3 months vs. previous year, %

11 +46 +30

A B C

31 +20 +26

10 +11 +1

23 +46 +60

7 +55 +96

4October 22, 2010

Page 5: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Q3 - the Americas

Strong growth in North America– Sequential improvement for most types of equipment and

for the aftermarket.

– The demand from manufacturing and construction industries developed particularly well.

Record level of orders in South America– Continued strong demand from all countries and from most

customer segments

October 22, 20105

September 2010

A B CA = Share of orders received, year-to-date, %

B = Year-to-date vs. previous year, %

C = Last 3 months vs. previous year, %

18 +51 +49

11 +46 +30

Page 6: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Q3 - Europe and Africa/Middle East

Slightly improved activity in Europe– Sequential improvement in most industries, but sales to

construction industry was somewhat weaker than in Q2

– Strong growth vs. weak Q3 2009

– The best development in the east, with the south at the bottom of the list

Mixed picture in Africa / Middle East– Improved sales to mining industry in South Africa

– Lower sales in the Middle East

– Aftermarket business developed favorably

October 22, 20106

September 2010

A B CA = Share of orders received, year-to-date, %

B = Year-to-date vs. previous year, %

C = Last 3 months vs. previous year, %

31 +20 +26

10 +11 +1

Page 7: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Q3 - Asia and Australia

Record order intake in Asia– Strong growth in all major markets

– High activity level in all industries supported strong growth in aftermarket

– Large mining order from Kazakhstan

Continued favorable mining demand in Australia contributed to record orders received

October 22, 20107

September 2010

A B CA = Share of orders received, year-to-date, %

B = Year-to-date vs. previous year, %

C = Last 3 months vs. previous year, %

23 +46 +60

7 +55 +96

Page 8: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Organic* growth per quarter

Change in orders received in % vs. same quarter previous year

October 22, 20108

Atlas Copco Group, continuing operations

*Volume and price

Page 9: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

July - September January - September

Orders Orders

MSEK Received Revenues Received Revenues

2009 14 309 15 088 43 175 47 820

Cancellations, % - - +2 * -

Structural change, % +2 +2 +2 +2

Currency, % -2 -2 -4 -4

Price, % +1 +1 +1 +1

Volume, % +34 +17 +28 +7

Total, % +35 +18 +29 +6

2010 19 316 17 743 55 804 50 474

*Cancellations in Q1 2009

Atlas Copco Group – sales bridge

9October 22, 2010

Page 10: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Revenues Operating Operating ROCE

MSEK profit margin

12 month values, period ending sep-10 sep-10 sep-10 sep-10

Compressor Technique 33 295 7 483 22.5% 64%

Construction and Mining Technique 27 378 4 507 16.5% 24%

Industrial Technique 6 042 956 15.8% 38%

Eliminations/Common Group Functions -299 -588

Atlas Copco Group 66 416 12 358 18.6% 25%

Atlas Copco GroupRevenues, operating profit and return on capital employed (ROCE) by business area

10October 22, 2010

Page 11: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Compressor Technique

25% organic order growth vs. Q3 2009– Continued strong demand for stationary and portable

compressors

– Strong growth in North and South America, Asia and eastern Europe

Very strong development in aftermarket with high growth in emerging markets

Operating margin at 26.0%– Positively affected by volume, efficiency improvements,

sales mix, currency and price

Acquisition of Cirmac in October. – Biogas upgrading and gas treatment systems

October 22, 201011

Page 12: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Compressor Technique

12October 22, 2010

*Volume and price

Page 13: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Construction and Mining Technique

Strong growth in both equipment and aftermarket– 47% organic order growth vs. Q3 2009

– Continued strong demand from the mining industry

– Orders for construction equipment somewhat weaker than in Q2

Operating margin at 17.8%– MSEK 100 restructuring cost for consolidating production in Germany

– Record high operating margin, excluding restructuring, at 19.2%

Acquisition of manufacturer of mobile crushers and screeners

October 22, 201013

Page 14: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Construction and Mining Technique

14October 22, 2010

*Volume and price

Page 15: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Industrial Technique

Improved demand from all customer segments – 45% organic order growth vs. Q3 2009

– Strong growth in Asia

– Rapid growth of aftermarket, particularly in emerging markets

Operating margin increased to 20.2%– Positively affected by increased volumes and cost savings

Acquisition of a distributor business in Michigan, the United States

October 22, 201015

Page 16: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Industrial Technique

16October 22, 2010

*Volume and price

Page 17: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Group total

17October 22, 2010

MSEK 2010 2009 % 2010 2009 %

Orders received 19 316 14 309 +35 55 804 43 175 +29

Revenues 17 743 15 088 +18 50 474 47 820 +6

Operating profit 3 782 2 402 +57 9 908 6 640 +49

- as a percentage of revenues 21.3 15.9 19.6 13.9

Profit before tax 3 675 2 210 +66 9 575 5 947 +61

- as a percentage of revenues 20.7 14.6 19.0 12.4

Profit for the period 2 650 1 730 +53 7 028 4 576 +54

Basic earnings per share, SEK 2.17 1.42 5.77 3.75

Return on capital employed, % 25 21

July - September January - September

Page 18: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Organic Growth One-time items

MSEK Price/Volume Acq./Div.

Atlas Copco Group

Revenues 17 743 2 565 -260 350 15 088

EBIT 3 782 1 575 -135 -60 2 402

% 21.3% 61% - - 15.9%

Q3 2010 Currency Q3 2009

Profit bridgeJuly – September, 2010 vs 2009

18October 22, 2010

Page 19: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Organic Growth One-time items

MSEK Price/Volume Acq./Div.

Compressor Technique

Revenues 8 877 953 -190 315 7 799

EBIT 2 312 806 15 40 1 451

% 26.0% 85% - - 18.6%

Construction & Mining Technique

Revenues 7 357 1 346 10 25 5 976

EBIT 1 312 559 30 -100 823

% 17.8% 42% - - 13.8%

Industrial Technique

Revenues 1 569 381 -65 10 1 243

EBIT 317 244 -10 0 83

% 20.2% 64% - - 6.7%

Q3 2010 Currency Q3 2009

Profit bridge – by business areaJuly – September, 2010 vs 2009

19October 22, 2010

Page 20: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

MSEK Sep 30, 2010 Dec 31, 2009 Sep 30, 2009

Intangible assets 13 539 20% 12 697 19% 12 593 19%

Rental equipment 1 867 3% 2 056 3% 2 048 3%

Other property, plant and equipment 5 702 8% 5 993 9% 6 046 9%

Other fixed assets 4 452 7% 6 556 10% 6 060 9%

Inventories 12 287 18% 11 377 17% 12 623 19%

Receivables 16 575 25% 15 433 23% 15 883 24%

Current financial assets 1 554 2% 1 530 2% 1 598 2%

Cash and cash equivalents 11 388 17% 12 165 18% 10 005 15%

Assets classified as held for sale 64 0% 67 0% 35 0%

TOTAL ASSETS 67 428 67 874 66 891

Total equity 26 124 39% 25 671 38% 23 404 35%

Interest-bearing liabilities 21 913 32% 25 735 38% 27 498 41%

Non-interest-bearing liabilities 19 391 29% 16 468 24% 15 989 24%

TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 67 428 67 874 66 891

Balance sheet

20October 22, 2010

Page 21: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Capital structure

21

Net Debt*/EBITDA

* Net Debt adjusted for the fair value of interest rate swaps

October 22, 2010

Page 22: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Atlas Copco AB’s loan maturity profile

22October 22, 2010

Page 23: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

July - September January - SeptemberMSEK 2010 2009 2010 2009

Operating cash surplus after tax 3 739 2 360 9 886 5 383 of which depreciation added back 639 661 1 834 1 840Change in working capital -1 035 2 032 -1 087 5 118Increase in rental equipment, net -92 -35 -274 -140 Cash flows from operating activities 2 612 4 357 8 525 10 361Investments of property, plant & eq. -274 -217 -644 -788Sale of property, plant & eq. 14 29 37 67Other investments, net 127 106 -369 -22Cash flow from investments -133 -82 -976 -743 Operating cash flow 2 479 4 275 7 549 9 618Company acquisitions/ divestments -282 -10 -1 668 -165

Cash flow

Operating cash surplus after tax is adjusted for equity hedges in net financial items.

23October 22, 2010

Page 24: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Capital Markets Day

December 1, 2010, in Nacka, Sweden

www.atlascopco.com/CMD2010

October 22, 201024

Page 25: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Near-term outlook

The overall demand for the Group’s products and services is expected to increase somewhat. The sequential improvement is primarily expected to come from emerging markets.

25October 22, 2010

Page 26: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Committed tosustainable productivity.

26October 22, 2010

Page 27: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results
Page 28: Atlas Copco Q3/2010 results

Cautionary Statement

“Some statements herein are forward-looking and the actual outcome could be materially different. In addition to the factors explicitly commented upon, the actual outcome could be materially and adversely affected by other factors such as the effect of economic conditions, exchange-rate and interest-rate movements, political risks, the impact of competing products and their pricing, product development, commercialization and technological difficulties, supply disturbances, and major customer credit losses.”

28October 22, 2010