asilo politico

26
Political Asylum in Italy: A picture of the policies and evolution of the phenomenon May 2006 Luca Bicocchi 1

Upload: sleepy984

Post on 07-Apr-2015

155 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Asilo Politico

Political Asylum in Italy: A picture of the policies and evolution of the phenomenon

May 2006

Luca Bicocchi

1

Page 2: Asilo Politico

Index

Introduction pag 3

1. The Italian legislation on political asylum 4

1.1 Political asylum, a right in the dark 4

1.2 From “Martelli” law to “Bossi-Fini”, a story of a law never written 5

1.3 The actual norms on political asylum 6

1.4 The harmonization process at the Communitarian level 9

2. The presence of asylum seekers and refugees 11

2.1 The numbers of asylum seekers and refugees 11

2.2 The evolution of the phenomenon 12

2.3 The auditions carried out from Commissione Centrale 13

2.4 The reform and the work of the Territorial Commission 14

2.5 The special Commission “Stralcio” 16

2.6 The nationalities mainly represented and the movement of the income

flows

17

3. The welcome of asylum seekers and refugees in Italy 19

3.1 From Azione Comune to Programma Nazionale Asilo, towards a

welcoming system

19

3.2 The “Bossi-Fini” law and the institution of “the System of Protection

for Asylum seekers and refugees”

21

3.3 The projects actually financed and the available resources 22

3.4 The instruments for integration 23

3.5 Which kind of welcoming: between integration and abandonment 24

2

Page 3: Asilo Politico

Introduction

This paper is a work-in-progress; part of research from the Parsec Association a part of

the Nova Consortium, developed by the Equal project, “Inclusion Refugees Network”.

The project is financed by the European Community by the board of 5.1 of the Equal, in

favor of refugees integration. The head of the project is the Italian Federation Therapeutic

Community together with the Nova Consortium present with eight other national

partners. The research is aiming at offering better ways of making our partners inside the

project aware of the subject of political asylum. The main objective of this research is

therefore to present an analysis of the process of the social connection that involves the

asylum seekers and refugees in order to provide them a better welcoming service.

The proposed activities of this research are multiple because of the complexity of this

phenomenon. Together with the analysis and presentation of the reality of political

asylum in Italy, in which this paper is about, the research aims also at producing: a) case

studies on different welcoming centers in Italy (specifically focused on the different ways

of integration); b) focus groups with the guests of the centers; c) in-depth interviews with

the asylum seekers and refugees. This paper is therefore focused on the evolution of this

phenomenon as well as on political situation on asylum in Italy. The effect of this

research was made by desk research already carried out. Above all the lack of attention

that this theme receives from the media and the public opinion in general is reflected also

in the scarcity of the publications on this subjects. In order to broaden the knowledge of

this phenomenon I have made done some in-depth interviews with the most important

associations involved in this theme. The sources for this work have been the research

already done on this theme in the last years (mainly on the web), the in-depth interviews1,

the legislation and the statistical data supplied by the National Commission of Asylum.

1 The interviews have been done in the months October-December 2005, with the most important ngo’s that work on this theme. In particular the following persons have been interviewed: Filippo Miraglia, responsible of immigration and asylum of Arci; Chiara Peri, responsible of the sensitivization programs of Centro Astalli; Jurgen Humburg, representative of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees in Italy; Maria Silvia Olivieri, responsible of immigration and asylum of Consorzio Italiano di Solidarietà, Luca Pacini, responsible of immigration and asylum of Anci; Paola di Rado, responsible of border services for immigration of Consiglio Italiano Rifugiati; Fiorella Rattaus, responsible of social services of Consiglio Italiano Rifugiati; Virginia Costa, vice director of Servizio Centrale del Sistema di protezione per richiedenti asilo e rifugiati; Andrea Accardi, responsible of the Italian projects of Medici Senza Frontiere, Ngo Din Le Quyanne responsible of asylum of Caritas.

3

Page 4: Asilo Politico

1. The Italian legislation for political asylum

1.1 Political asylum, a right in the dark

The subject of political asylum in Italy continues to be hardly debated in the political

institutional field and is almost ignored by the media and the public opinion in general.

Part of the responsibility of this situation falls back on the media and the press and on the

fact that they have never dealt with this theme in depth and without prejudices.

Nevertheless the main responsibility falls back on the political forces of our country, both

the right and the left. Not only have they never opened a general debate on the topic but

when they have made legislations on this issue they have treated asylum as merely a

marginal part of “immigrational matters”.

Italy remains the only country in Europe lacking an organic law on asylum. This lacking,

besides its strongly symbolic value, has multiple consequences on the level of the

effective application of the right. As reported by Centro Astalli of Rome, the most

important implication can be found in the fact that the responsibility of the state remains

not clearly defined, both in terms of political responsibility and in terms of economic

resources. We can, therefore, affirm that "fundamentally the institutions are not directly

responsible for the asylum seekers like they should be".

Another consequence emphasized by the Consorzio Italiano di Solidarietà (ICS), is the

arbitrary behavior of the various questure on the territory. The lack of a legislative

reference clearly has provoked over the years a much different behavior between various

zones of the state, attributing greater importance to the praxis held from the single

questure rather than to the actual written law2.

Finally, a last aspect indicated from Associazione Nazionale Comuni Italiani (Anci), is

the fact that without a general law on asylum the application of article 10 of the

Constitution3 is lacking in fruition.

2 An example of this is the different functioning of the Centri di Identificazione: the center of Crotone is a close center but Foggia and Trapani are not. 3 Article 10 of the Italian Constitution recognizes the right of asylum for the “the foreigner who is denied in his own country the real exercise of the democratic liberties”. The Corte di Cassazione has established, with the sentence 4674 of 1997, that the dispositions established in article 10 can be appealed to the normal court.

4

Page 5: Asilo Politico

1.2 From the “Martelli” Law to the “Bossi-Fini”, a story of a law never written

The Martelli law, law 39 of 1990 is entitled: " urgent norms in matter of political asylum,

income and stay of the extra communitarian citizens and regularization of the extra

communitarian citizens and stateless people already present in the territory of the state".

It is the first national norm that faces the topic of the political asylum. However, as

evident from the same title of this law, the topic of the asylum is regulated within the

more general topics of the income and stay of the extra communitarian citizens.

The only article 1 of the law attempted to give the guidelines in order to regulate all

themes of political asylum. It is important to remember that is only with the Martelli law

that Italy has abolished the geographical reserve4 to its ratification of the Geneva

Convention of 1951 on political asylum. In fact, also because of the small presence of

refugees at that time the country5 continued to consider itself as a transit country and not

as a country of arrival for the refugees.

In article 1 the law confirms the definition of refugee of the Geneva Convention6

(without making any references to the constitutional asylum), defines the procedure for

the asylum application and finally provides a financial contribution for a limited period of

45 days as a form of welcome and reception. As it can be easily imagined the norms of

that single article turned out to be insufficient in regulating and giving clear dispositions

for such a complex topic like asylum.

Starting from the Martelli law, the topic of the asylum has been relegated to that single

article and also the subsequent legislation has changed the article’s provisions, without

however repealing it.

4 The geographical reserve provided that the right of asylum was granted only to asylum seekers coming from an European country. 5 In 1998 there was in Italy 7895 refugees under the Geneva Convention and 2662 under the mandate of Unhcr. 6 According to the Geneva Convention refugees is that person who “owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it.”

5

Page 6: Asilo Politico

As stated previously, the legislation coming after7 the Martelli law until the Law 189 of

2002 (the so-called Bossi-Fini) has attempted to give ad hoc answers to emergency

situations in order to satisfy the exceptional flows that arrived in our country. Without

analyzing the single norms, it is important however to remember how these have always

had the shape of decree-law turned to specific categories of extra communitarian citizens

already present on the territory8, trying to regulate those positions that the Martelli was

not able to do.

The attempts of an organic reform that have been presented in parliament have always

fallen to nothing. From all these, the one that has gone more ahead in its iter has been at

the end of XIII legislation, in 2001. On this regard the ngo’s associations havem, in many

occasions, proposed different solutions. As Centro Astalli of Rome reports, before the

approval of the Bossi-Fini law, the table of the associations of Rome had introduced a

document with some observations on the appeal, detention and other problematic points

of the law; however such "attempt of discussion has fallen absolutely in to nothing".

1.3 The actual norms on political asylum

The approval of Law 189/2002, so-called "Bossi-Fini" brings important changes and

modifications9 to the norms on the political asylum. The law in fact proposes, together

with a general reform of all the immigration law, important modifications to the text of

article 1 of the L39/90. Article 1 of L 39/90 however has not been repealed, but it

remains in vigor with the additional modifications, sic!.

In short the main innovations introduced from the law are:

the introduction of one double procedure: a) "simplified" for those who have

tried to elude the border controls to the frontier, or staying in irregular

conditions, for time of 20 days as a maximum, b) "ordinary" for all others

7 The most significant legislative intervention succeeding the Martelli law are: the Law 563/95, the so-called “Legge Puglia”, that established centers for the first welcoming fro immigrants and asylum seekers and the Law 40/98, the so-called “Turco-Napolitano”. The “Turco-Napolitano” law, art 5 comma 6, provided the possibility of an humanitarian status for in the case in which the expulsion of the alien could constitute a violation of the international obligation assumed from Italy. 8 The most important flows that have entered in Italy in correspondence of international crisis are: from Albania in 1990 and 1991, from Somalia in 1992, and from Kosovo and the Ex-Yugoslavia during the second half of the 90’s. 9 Specifically articles 31 and 32.

6

Page 7: Asilo Politico

the institution of Seven Territorial Commissions for the examination of the

application for the recognition of the status (Gorizia, Milan, Rome, Foggia,

Siracusa, Crotone, Trapani)

the institution in correspondence of the Territorial Commission of Centers of

Identification (Cdi), a close center in which the asylum seekers in a simplified

procedure are restrained, waiting for the examination of the application

the impossibility to make jurisdictional appeal against the refused of the

application except for those who have already left the territory of the state10

The innovations introduced have become effective after the 6th of January 2005 when the

rule has come in to force. The real functioning of the new norms, remains however

uncertain. At this moment only three of the proposed Cdi are in function: Crotone,

Trapani and Foggia. Moreover, according to what several associations report, the praxis

held from the questure regarding the simplified and ordinary procedures are

heterogeneous and sometimes incomprehensible. As an example, according to what is

reported by the Italian Refugees Council (Cir), if there are no Cdi in close proximity,

some questure pay for the expenses of travel for the Cdi, and some do not.

Also in some cases it is communicated to the asylum seekers the fact that if they do not

show up in front of the Cdi on the date requested, this will have as a consequence the

renunciation of the application, in other cases this information is omitted, with the

consequences that can be imagined. However, besides the incorrect and not uniform

application of the norms, many exponents of ngo’s have expressed strong critics also on

the dispositions of the law itself. Generally speaking, what appears clearly from the

formulation of the law – that is the scope declared from the legislator–is to contrast the

instrumentalization of the right of asylum from the aliens in irregular conditions who do

not need international protection. This formulation permeates all the dispositions

proposed so that, as reported by Medici Senza Frontiere (Msf), the aspect of the contrast

to the abuse of the right is very present, but what it lacks completely is the possibility of

10 There is the possibility of a procedure of re-examination, made by the same Commission and one member of the Commissione nazionale asilo. The re-examination must be requested within 5 days after the negative result. The possibility of appeal remains but it has no suspense effects on the expulsion. As reported by Msf, the law is not clear in this passage. “What does it means waiting outside the country? If is a third country why the country should take this person? If is the country of origin this is a clear violation of the Geneva Convention”.

7

Page 8: Asilo Politico

fruition of the same right. The "restrainement" –for not using the word detention11– of the

asylum seekers before the interview with the Commission, between the changes

introduced, seems to correspond to this formulation. The "restrainement" of wide

categories of asylum seekers is one of the most criticized aspects reported in an official

press release of Unhcr12, and all the associations interviewed share this same opinion.

Without entering into the specific aspects of the dispositions proposed the other point that

has been emphasized from many interviews is, in the praxis, the absolute arbitrariness

and insufficient transparency of the behavior of the border police. Many associations in

fact report of cases of collective rejection at the border due to lack of availability of

places in the Cdi, or of persons denied the possibility to make a application on the basis

of their nationality13.

On the contrary a shorter time for the examination of the application has been generally

positively received. According to the text of the law, this would have taken 20 days for

the simplified procedure and 35 for the ordinary one. According to the interviews, the

Territorial Commissions respect approximately the previewed schedules.

Surely the shortening of the waiting times, mainly in comparison with the previous 18

months, must be considered a good step forward. Some doubts about such a short time

though, are mainly concerning the victims of torture and the persons who are in a

psychologically weak state at the moment of the arrival. For these in fact, without an

specific psychological support and in such a short time the risk of arriving in front of the

Commission not sufficiently prepared, without having elaborated the suffering endured,

may result in the possible outcome of an interview in which the person is not able to

express verbally all his past experiences and therefore may receive a negative result.

The other legislative interventions, succeeded to Bossi-Fini, have been Dlgs 7/4/2003

actuation of the European Directive 2001/55 CE, on the temporary protection for the

peoples evacuated because of the war. This norm has not introduced substantial

innovations to what has already been proposed from the L40/98, and 30 Dlgs 140/5/2005

actuation of the European Directive 2003/9 CE on the minimum standards of welcoming. 11 The Centri di Identificazione should be placed in separated structure from the Centri di Permanenza Temporanea for the economic migrants, due to the particular status of asylum seekers. De facto in many cases there is no separation and the structures are the same. 12 Press released of Unhcr of 22 April 2006 “Procedura d’asilo Bossi-Fini: primo bilancio Unhcr”. 13 Msf and Arci have referred about this cases monitoring the loading and the first welcoming centers.

8

Page 9: Asilo Politico

Dlgs 140 brings two meaningful innovations: it gives the responsibility of the inclusion

of the asylum seekers into the “Sistema di Protezione” to prefetture, creating a parallel

system to that one of “Servizio Centrale”, as I will explain later on–and frankly it is

difficult to understand the reason– and moreover it gives the possibility to work for the

asylum seekers who are waiting for more than six months for the interview, eliminating

therefore the absurd norm that prevented them of being able to work regularly. The more

recent legislation on asylum shows that, still remaining a matter mainly of national

competence, the communitarian legislation is acquiring greater importance. For this

reason, we felt it useful to include at the end of this part on the legislation a general

reference to the evolution of the European legislation.

1.4 The harmonization process at Communitarian level

The adoption of the European Act in 1986, starts the process that will carry in 1992 to the

discouragement of the inner frontiers and to the creation of the European market.

Together to the progressive abolition of the inner frontiers and with the consequent free

circulation of the persons inside the community, the control of the incomes from the extra

European states becomes therefore central.

With the entrance in force of the Schengen Convention in 1990 the inner frontiers are

abolished and a series of common rules for the control of the external frontiers are

established, with the institution of the Informative Schengen System (SIS). Regarding the

political asylum, the Dublin Convention established in 1990 which state is competent to

examine the asylum application introduced in a European country. The process of

harmonization of the norms marks an important step in ahead with the Amsterdam Treaty

in 1997 with which the European Union is engaged to catch up common objectives in the

fields of immigration and the asylum14. Such engagement has been further developed

with the European Council of Tampere 199915. From that moment the Commission has

begun to legislate on the matter with a series of Directives aiming at harmonizing the

legislations of the single states on European standards. The main Directives and 14 Title IV, art.61-69, concerns immigration and asylum and provides the passage from the third to the first pilar, from the intergovernmental to the communitarian level. 15 Conclusion 4 of the Council established :” The aim is an open and secure European Union, fully committed to the obligations of the Geneva Refugee Convention and other relevant human rights instruments, and able to respond to humanitarian needs on the basis of solidarity”.

9

Page 10: Asilo Politico

Regulations in accordance with the political lines of the European Council, have been the

following:

a) with the Regulation 2725/2000 the Eurodac system – a data bank of digital prints of

immigrants that have entered in the European territory, used in order to establish the

competent state for examinations of the applications –, has become effective.

b) In 2001 the Directive 2001/55 CE on the temporary protection in case of massive

income of evacuated persons (As stated previously our legislation has received these

norms but did not introduce particular innovations in this matter).

c) Subsequently, the Directive 2003/9 established the minimal standards for the

welcoming of asylum seekers in the Member States.

d) A further Directive the 2004/83, is entitled "minimal norms on the attribution to

citizens thirds party or stateless people of the qualification of refugee or otherwise

persons needy of the international protection and minimal norms on the content of the

recognized protection". The latter establishes the criteria for the acknowledgment of the

status and the subsidiary protection.

e) Finally the Directive 2005/85 on "minimal norms for the procedures applied in the

states members to the ends of the acknowledgment and of repeal of the refugee status"

establishes the minimum common standards on the procedure of the analysis of the

applications. The Unhcr has expressed same concerns about the fact that such directive

risks to level the common standards "towards the bottom" and also about the dispositions

concerning the possibility to designate a “third safe country” to send the asylum seekers

still waiting for the examination of the application, as we will also see later on.

10

Page 11: Asilo Politico

2. The presence of asylum seekers and refugees

2.1 The number16 of asylum seekers and refugees

The number of asylum seekers and refugees in the territory has been a fiercely debated in

recent years. The Ministry of the Interior, which is in charge of supplying the statistical

data, has often presented these data in a fragmented way and usually also in delay.

For years Italy has remained outside from the yearbooks of the Unhcr just because the

government did not succeed to supply the data in useful times. As a consequence there

has been a financial loss when the contributions of the European Fund for Refugees have

been distributed17. With this lack of data, as it often happens in these cases, the political

debate has taken the windward so that also the numbers have become a political

instrument which has been use according to the different political agenda, as is also for

the rejections and the expulsions and also for the asylum applications submitted and for

the responses. Anci states that in Italy there has been an attempt to manage the perception

of the phenomenon more than to deal with the phenomenon itself.

The Ics report on 2005 has made an accurate research on the presence of asylum seekers

and refugees on the Italian territory. In such report there is a comparison of the different

data supplied from Unhcr, Commissione Centrale and questure in order to make an

esteem of approximately 25.000 asylum seekers present on the territory in 2003, and of

13.000 refugees recognized18. Actually the data on the presence of asylum seekers and

refugees are of approximately 15.000 refugees and 11.000 applications of asylum

submitted at the end of 2005. At a general level, before analyzing more in details the data

supplied by the National Commission on Asylum, we can remark that the amount of

asylum seekers is relative small, especially if compared with those of other European

countries. An interesting aspect emphasized by Arci is that the low level of applications

submitted is the evidence of the fact that an instrumental use of the asylum does not exist

16 The statistical data in this section are the ones of Commissione Nazionale Asilo, if not differently specified. 17 As reported in the Ics report, Rifugiati in Italia: la protezione negata. Primo rapporto sul diritto d’asilo in Italia, in 2003 Italy has received only 6% of the financing of the fund. In fact the division of the fund was made on the base of the presence of asylum seekers in the territory and the Italian statistical data were not update. 18 Ics, Op. cit, pag 44.

11

Page 12: Asilo Politico

in Italy, on the contrary of certain governmental propaganda. With a medium of

approximately 300.000 incomes per year of immigrants, only approximately 5% of them

ask for asylum, while in other European countries the numbers are incomparably higher

(in France about approximately 50.000 applications per year, while in Germany 100,000).

This means that many immigrants having in theory the possibility to ask for asylum,

prefer to remain in an irregular condition waiting for a regularization.

2.2 The evolution of the phenomenon

Firstly we can see that the trend of the asylum applications formulated according the

Geneva Convention that has interested our Country in the past three years 2002/2004, has

had the following trend:

Table 1 Asylum applications from 2002 to 2005

2002 2003 2004 2005*

19704 15179 14189 11452 * Our elaboration on the applications submitted to Commissione Centrale until 21-04-2005 and to the

Commissioni Territoriali for the last part of the year.

The strong decrease of the asylum applications in Italy is more or less in line with what is

happening in the rest of Europe. There has been in these years a crackdown on the

controls at the border that together with the agreements of cooperation and repatriation

has produced a strong lowering of the asylum applications in Europe. The Unhcr has

expressed fears regarding the European situation, especially about the cited European

Directive 2005/85. Specifically some norms are strongly questioned concerning the

permission allowed to the states to designate third safe countries, outside the European

Union in which the asylum seekers can be sent back even if their application has not been

examined in a Union member country. As far as the Italian case is concerned, this

decrease depends, according to many associations, from an indiscriminate use of the

rejection at the border rather than to a real decrease of the persons in need of protection.

12

Page 13: Asilo Politico

2.3 The auditions carried out from Commissione Centrale

Together with the number of applications submitted, the second aspect that allows us to

have a clearer picture of the phenomenon is given by the interviews carried out from

Commissione Centrale and after the 21st of April 2005 from the Commissioni

Territoriali.

Table 2 Numbers of applications submitted and examined from Commissione Centrale

From 2002 to 21.04.2005 Total number Percentage

Examined 41152 74,5%

Still pending* 14143 25,5%

Total applications submitted 51131 100%19

* 4164 before 2002

Table 3 Responses given by Commissione Centrale

From 2002 to 21.04.2005 Total number Percentage

Negative 11699 28,4%

Humanitarian 5819 14,2%

Untraceable 20081 48,8%

Positive 3168 7,7%

Other* 385 0,9%

Total examined 41152 100%

* (Transferred, cessations, renunciations, not considered, suspended)

Looking at table n° 2 on the auditions carried out from the Commissione Centrale we can

underline some important aspects. Firstly we must take in to account, the high number,

approximately a quarter of the total, of the applications that must be still examined. These

data have meant on one side the partial failure of the system set up from the Martelli law,

because of the incapability of the structure theoretically proposed of giving a response to

the asylum applications submitted. Secondly, such a delay has meant for the asylum

seekers a very long time of waiting with an average of 18 months, with all the difficulties 19 To calculate the percentage it has been calculated the total of the applications submitted from 2002 minus the number of the pending applications previously to 2002 obtained considering the sum of the examined questions and still to consider minus the applications submitted starting from 2002.

13

Page 14: Asilo Politico

of daily life. The high number of pending applications turns out still more remarkable if

is taken on account, and this is another important point, of the real number of interviews

effectively carried out. These are a little more than half of the total. In fact nearly 50% of

the applications examined have had a negative outcome for impossibility of finding them.

This means that the person who had to be examined has not been reached by the call of

the Commission for the interview. These data are the exact "short circuit" type of

example that had affected the procedure. The impossibility to find a place in a welcoming

center, as it will be explained later, forced the asylum seekers to move into unstable

dormitories, so that it was almost impossible for them to maintain the recorded address at

the moment of the presentation of the application. The consequence has been that the

asylum seekers have not been informed of the call from the Commission, therefore the

result has been a negative outcome of the application.

As reported by Caritas, clear evidence of this is the fact that the asylum seekers included

in the welcoming centers have instead all continued the iter and they all arrived to the

Commission.

2.4 The reform and the work of the Territorial Commission

When the Bossi-Fini law has become effective the system has been deeply reformed and

the only Commissione Centrale has been replaced by seven.

If we see the data on the interviews carried out from by Commissioni Territoriali we see

that important changes have taken place according to the new procedure.

Table 4 Applications submitted and examined from Commissioni Territoriali from 21-04-

2005 to 27-02-2006

Roma Crotone Trapani Siracusa Foggia Milano Gorizia Totale

Applications

submitted

510 1682 952 1020 2650 1052 250 8116

Applications

Examined

427 1672 846 1020 2574 711 197 7447

Applications

pending

83 10 106 0 76 341 53 669

14

Page 15: Asilo Politico

Table 5 Total number of applications submitted and examined from Commissioni

Territoriali

Total number Percentage

Total applications examined 7447 91,7%

Total applications pending 669 8,3%

Total applications submitted 8116 100%

The efficiency of the new procedure, concerning the possibility of giving a response in a

short time and of examining all the applications, seems to be confirmed by these data.

Comparing these data with the ones of Commissione Centrale the differences are evident,

as the percentage of hanging applications has been reduced of is more than half after the

reform. However What is important to remember that the integration process of the

asylum seekers it is not depleted with the practice of t he recognition of the status. Once

outside of the Cdi, the persons run the risk of finding themselves completely lost in the

new society. Ics reports of persons left from the centers, with humanitarian permission,

but completely unaware of their rights, of any information on where to go or to whom

they should ask for aid.

Together with the shortening times of waiting, the reform also has had a strong impact

on the kind of responses given by the Commissioni Territoriali.

Table 6 Responses given by Commissioni Territoriali from 21-04-2005 to 27-02-2006

Roma Crotone Trapani Siracusa Foggia Milano Gorizia Totale

Positive 31 32 59 40 56 66 74 358

Negative 238 1184 124 468 1187 282 55 3538

Humanitarian 133 456 663 497 1164 90 46 3049

Re-examination 0 10 127 0 129 0 0 266

Untraceable 25 0 0 15 150 208 0 398

Suspended 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 65

Other 17 * 22 ** 39

*competence of other states **dismissed

15

Page 16: Asilo Politico

Table 7 Responses given by Commissione Centrale and Commissioni Territoriali

Commissione Centrale

2002 to 21.04.2005

Percentage

Commissioni Territoriali

21-04-2005 to 27-02-2006

Percentage

Negative 28,4% 45,8%

Humanitarian 14,2% 39,6%

Untraceable 48,8% 5,2%

Positive 7,7% 4,7%

Re-examination (only for

Commissioni Territoriali)

3,4%

Others* 0,9% 1,3%

Total examined 100% 100%

* (Transferred, cessations, renunciations, not considered, suspended)

Table 7 shows some important points of difference between old and new procedures.

First of all a decrease in untraceable asylum seekers. Contextually to that however there

is also an important change on the type of responses given: a) there is a larger increase of

negative answers, b) a lesser decrease of those positive (persons recognized as refugees

according the Geneva Convention), c) an increase of more than the double of

humanitarians (persons to whom is granted a temporary protection).

2.5 The Special Commission “Stralcio”

With the reform of the system on 21th April 2005 a “Commissione Speciale Stralcio" has

also been created, in order to respond to the thousands of hanging applications to the

Central Commission under the “old” procedure. Unfortunately, as it comes out from

many interviews made and from statistical data, such commission is in serious delay with

the job, with a result that till nowadays – nearly a year from the reform of the procedure –

thousands of persons are still waiting for the interview under the "old procedure".

16

Page 17: Asilo Politico

Table 8 Applications examined and still pending by Commissione Speciale Stralcio

22.04.2005 to 31.12.2005 Number Percentage

Applications examined 3732 26,3%

Applications still pending 14143 100%

As it is evident from Table 8 the applications examined from the Commissione Stralcio at

the end of 2005 represent only approximately 1/4 of the total of the applications that are

still pending according to the data supplied from the National Commission on Asylum.

This delay in carrying out the auditions of the pending applications of the previous years,

represents a serious handicap for the new system established with the reform of the

territorial commissions. Without "discharging" the beyond 10.00020 applications still

pending in front of the Commissione Stralcio in fact the introduction of the territorial

commission in order to decentralize the analysis of the applications and guarantee a

greater efficiency and rapidity in the analysis of them, remains in a certain way

"maimed". Indeed, from many parts it is denounced the extreme slowness of the

Commissione Stralcio in the discharge of the pending applications. The government,

therefore, in order to cope with such a situation has decided with a decree of the Prime

Minister dated 23 March 2006, to allow the territorial commission to consider also the

pending applications in front of the Commissione Stralcio, in order to discharge them

more quickly.

2.6 The nationalities mainly represented and the movement of the income flows

If we analyze the different nationalities mainly represented between those who have

made asylum applications, we can notice some important points. There are not some

specific nationalities more represented than the others, but on the contrary there are many

different ones with a continuous movement in the course of the years. This is a specific

character of the Italian immigration, that is not influenced from colonial linkages, as it is

the case, for example, of France and England, but is instead characterized by a great

heterogeneity regarding the countries of origin. Besides that the analysis of table 9

20 The applications submitted before 2002 are not considered.

17

Page 18: Asilo Politico

clarifies, at least in part, that the income flows reflect the several international crises that

are have occurred in the last decades (Albania, Former Yugoslavia, Iraq etc).

Table 9 First 5 nationalities within applications of asylum submitted from 1990 to 2004

1990-2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Albania 21.300 Iraq 1.985 Iraq 1.944 Somalia 1.743 Serbia-

Montenegro 1.989

RF Yugoslavia

12.197 Turkey 1.690 Liberia 1.660 Liberia 1.550 Romania 1.161

Iraq 12.132 RF Yugoslavia

1.526 Sri Lanka 1.526

Serbia-

Montenegro 1.510 Nigeria 930

Romania 6.114 Sri Lanka 555 RF Yugoslavia

1.418 Eritrea 1.230 Eritrea 831

Turkey 4.250 Romania 501 Pakistan 1.256 Pakistan 787 Sudan 486

Source: Dossier Caritas 2005. Data of Commissione Centrale.

With the changing of the origin of the income flows the pressure on the different border

has also changed. We have, therefore, assisted to a progressive movement towards the

South Western coasts of the peninsula with inflows of asylum seekers. During the first

half of the 90’s, we can generally observe that on the Italian-Slovene’s borders and also

on the Adriatic coasts the pressure asylum seekers has been stronger. As far as the

geography of the entrance is concerned we have noticed a high flow of persons from the

Balkan area: the evacuated ones from the former Yugoslavia, the Albanians and the

Kossovarians. From the second half of the 90’s the channels of entrance were gradually

moved, in a first moment to the coasts of Calabria, mainly coming from Kurdistan,

Turkey, Iraq and other countries of the Middle East, then to the coasts of Sicily, from

sub-Saharan Africa but also from Middle Eastern countries after a period of transit in

countries such as Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. The data supplied from the territorial

commission seem to confirm such change, even if we must remark that the place of

presentation of the application, and the consequent examination of it, not necessarily

corresponds to the place of arrival of the asylum seekers.

18

Page 19: Asilo Politico

3. The Welcome of asylum seekers and refugees in Italy

3.1 From Azione Comune to Programma Nazionale Asilo, towards a welcoming

system

The welcome of asylum seekers and refugees together with the reform of the procedure is

the other aspect that the new legislation has reformed. The state should in theory be

responsible for the welcome of the asylum seekers. In Italy however the idea of a direct

responsibility of the state for the welcome of the asylum seekers has delayed a lot in

taking a firm stance and still, as we will see, such responsibility remains highly

disregarded. During the 90’s the welcoming was relegated to single projects of different

ngo’s and the only participation of the state was a financial contribution called first

welcoming contribution. Only at the end of the 90’s the first "integrated" welcoming

plan was developed. A national system of welcoming for asylum seekers and refugees

was started for the first time with the project "Azione Comune". The project "Azione

Comune", managed from the Cir with the participation of several local agencies, has

involved approximately one thousand asylum seekers, mainly Kossovarians, and for the

first time has assumed an organic system of welcoming with the involvement of the local

authorities. Its principal goal was that of giving not only first aid, but of supplying also

useful instruments for the asylum seekers in view of their social integration21. A project

therefore of "high profile", that has represented a fundamental turn in the management of

the policies of welcoming, overcoming the emergency’s approach and ad hoc.

In fact starting from the results and the experience of that project a national strategy for

the welcoming of asylum seekers and refugees has been set up, with the institution of the

National Plan for Asylum (PNA) and afterwards with the institution of Servizio Centrale

for asylum seekers and refugees (article 32 of the "Bossi-Fini" law).

The PNA was founded in 2001 on the base of an agreement between the Ministry of the

Interior, the Unhcr and the Anci. The PNA endorses the points of force shown from

Azione Comune and in fact proposes a decentralized welcoming system, in which the

21 The law 40/98 gives to the municipalities an important role in the welcoming and integration of the immigrants.

19

Page 20: Asilo Politico

local authority is the main actor in the planning of the welcoming. Within this

framework, the Anci has the coordination of the Plan and, through a ban, more than 50

municipalities join the plan in several regions of Italy. Azione Comune, as a pilot plan,

and the PNA, represent therefore the foundations on which the actual system is based.

The positive aspects shown from this experience are mainly two: firstly the promotion of

a decentralized system of welcoming with the involvement of the local authorities;

secondly the fact of having “promoted also the consolidation of a modus operandi deeply

different from the past, not based any longer exclusively on the solidarity but oriented

towards the realization of an integrated system of protection in which the welcoming is

only a first step in the process of integration. The Plan in fact aims at stimulating

authentically cross-sectional services, in order to accompany the person from the phase of

presentation of the application to the eventual stabilization and integration, or to the

voluntary return in the country of origin.22"

On the contrary the more critical point of the Plan is the scarcity and the uncertainty of

funds for financing. The funds available for the welcoming project are greatly insufficient

to guarantee a welcoming for all the asylum seekers arriving every year on the territory; it

can hardly guarantee the welcoming for a 1/6 of them. As emphasized by Anci, the

expenses for integration in Italy are less than a quarter of the sum of money spent for

contrasting clandestine immigration. Together with scarcity, the other problem has been

the uncertainty of the funds; as a consequence it has been extremely difficult on the part

of the associations to manage plans of welcoming for asylum seekers.

As reported by the associations interviewed there has been a cut nearly 50% of the funds

at the beginning of 2002. Beyond this, the other critical aspect has been, but for many

asylum seekers still is, the limited time of welcoming in comparison with the times of

waiting for the Commission. In fact, the maximum period for a welcome center is 6

months, in exceptional cases extended to another 6, to foster a turn-over for the new

arrivals. Unfortunately though in front of this limit, theoretically just, the real general

waiting time was, and for many still is, of 18 months.

22 See Centro Studi di Politica Internazionale, Dal Programma Nazionale Asilo al Sistema di protezione per richiedenti asilo e rifugiati, October 2004, pag 32.

20

Page 21: Asilo Politico

3.2 The “Bossi-Fini” law and the institution of “the System of Protection for Asylum

seekers and refugees”

With the entrance in force of Law 189/2002, the welcoming system here described

receives an "institutionalization". Article 32 in fact provides for the institution of the

"System of protection for asylum seekers and refugees" (SPRAR) and inside of the

System, a guiding role, as with PNA, is assumed by the Anci. In fact, the Ministry of the

Interior has entrusted the Anci with the responsibility of the "Servizio Centrale of

information, promotion, advising, monitoring and technical support", operative structure

of SPRAR23. Moreover, L 189/2002 institutes a "National Fund for the policies and the

services of asylum" –which incorporates the financings of the European Fund for

Refugees– in order to contribute up to a maximum of 80% of the expenses of the local

authorities for a welcoming project. For this purpose some ngo’s have reported that as

the local authorities must pay the remaining 20% of the expenses, it can happen that,

while the municipalities with greater possibilities can better face expenses for the project,

others are forced to manage the project "to the decrease". Caritas stated that often, in the

field the local authorities anticipate the entire sum which then is often reimbursed with

much delay. However always according to Caritas, beyond the problem of the resources,

there is the problem of the political will of the local authority and of its interest in

engaging itself in this field.

The local authority is, in fact, the holder of the political and managerial responsibility of

the welcoming project, and on the local authority falls back the burden of the reception

and of the integration of asylum seekers and refugees. However, there is no obligation for

this engagement and it only depends, as said, on the political will of the local authority.

The law provides for the institution of the National Fund for the policies and the services

of asylum in order to finance the welcoming project on the territory through specific

bans. The local authorities can participate to these bans if they have a welcoming project,

but they are free not to do so if they are not interested; there is no obligation on this.

23 Anci has signed a convention with International Organization for Migration for receiving technical support to the activity of Servizio Centrale.

21

Page 22: Asilo Politico

3.3 The projects actually financed and the available resources

With the last ban of December 2005, 102 projects for a total of 2.428 places available

have been financed for the year 2006. The projects that were already part of the "system"

have been all refinanced, even if, in some cases, for a smaller number of places.

Moreover 15 new municipalities, beyond the metropolitan areas of Rome and Milan24,

have entered in the system. The geographical distribution of the plans on the national

territory covers the entire peninsula. Between the projects financed 19 of them have been

financed because they were focused on the more vulnerable categories of asylum seekers,

like victims of torture, unaccompanied minors, etc.

The funds proposed for the management of the territorial projects are assigned to the

local authorities that are responsible and that must provided for the distribution to the

ngo’s project managers. The importance of such synergy, between institutions and ngo’s,

have been underlined both from Anci and from Servizio Centrale.

Anci stresses that this network involves the great national associations (Cir, Caritas, Ics),

as well as some local ones and that both the ngo’s and the local authorities have greatly

profited from this exchange. Servizio Centrale reports also that the better projects are

those with a good synergy between these two players and that the philosophy on which

the System is grounded is just that of supporting this kind of reciprocal exchange.

In the past years, starting from 2002, a part of 8 per mille has been added to the National

Fund for the policies and the services of asylum in order to finance the welcoming

projects. Unfortunately in the plan introduced from Anci for the widening and the support

of the policies of welcoming for the categories more vulnerable such as refugees and

asylum seekers is not included in the Dpcm of 30 January 2006, that allots 8 per mille for

2005. This will therefore have serious repercussions on the budget of the local

authorities.

24 Rome and Milan was excluded from Sistema di protezione and they entered this year with 150 places each. It is clear that both Rome and Milan have higher number of asylum seekers but in order not to receive all the funds available, it has been decided to limited the places financed by the Sistema di protezione, and financing the others with others funds.

22

Page 23: Asilo Politico

3.4 The instruments for integration

As we remarked before the development of PNA and then SPRAR, has promoted a new

definition of the concept of welcoming which goes beyond the idea of the bare minimum

(that relegates the welcoming to an exclusive material aid) and enables the person to start

a process of integration. Together with the welcoming the discourse has been broadened

with the problems of integration; during the last years, there has been an attempt to

strengthen the services inside the welcoming projects aiming at a real integration of the

person. The social integration that the different projects of PNA and then of SPRAR have

carried out, have involved different levels:

a) the teaching of the Italian language and the tutoring for the services of the territory, as

an tools for a better integration in the society;

b) different plans for the getting in the labour market, with stages and internships;

c) aids for finding an independent lodging in order to work out an exit plan from

assistance.

Different activities have been set up in the several projects on the territory in order to

reach these goals. An important contribution to the elaboration of an integration strategy

has been given by a previous Equal project, "Integra". Also on the base of the

experiences and recommendations of such a project, the Servizio Centrale has established

the minimum standards of the integration services provided by the centers in order to

participate to the Sistema di Protezione25.

25 "Operating handbook for the activation and the management of services of welcome and integration for asylum seekers, refugees and beneficiaries of humanitarian protection" of December 2005

23

Page 24: Asilo Politico

3.5 Which kind of welcoming: between integration and abandonment

The reality of the welcoming system for asylum seekers and refugees in Italy shows two

faces. On the one side there is a system that is aimed at supplying the instruments for a

real integration of the person; on the other side though there is the disconcerting problem

of the great number of all those who remain excluded from such a system and are

"abandoned to themselves". The numbers of the persons received by the PNA before and

the SPRAR then are clear. Starting from 2000, the beginning year of PNA, an average of

approximately 2000 persons per year has been accepted in the system. However, in these

same years, the average of applications submitted is around 15,000 per year. The places

granted cover a minimal percentage facing the real necessities and if the financing

remains on this level there is no possibility of changing this situation. For all those who

are excluded the only aid proposed was the financial contribution of the Martelli law,

abolished de facto with the Bossi-Fini law. Regarding this big "invisible" majority, we

must also remark that research projects and studies are lacking. While there are some

publications and researches on the system of the welcoming, the researches are

practically non existent26 on the real situation of the thousands of persons who remain

outside from it.

26 One of the few researches about this theme is the one of Centro Astalli, Storie di diritti negati, on the situation of Rome.

24

Page 25: Asilo Politico

BIBLIOGRAPHY

A.A.V.V, Rifugiati in Italia: la protezione negata. Primo rapporto sul diritto di

asilo in Italia, ICS, Roma, 2005

A.A. V.V, Survey on Policy and Practice related to refugee integration, Oxford

Brookes Unoversity, December 2002

Amnesty International, Italia, presenza temporanea, diritti permanenti. Il

trattamento dei cittadini stranieri detenuti nei “centri di permanenza temporanea

e assistenza”, Roma, 2005

Carolina Zincone e Rosa Helena Ippolito, Torniamo all’asilo. Uno studio per il

Programma Nazionale Asilo, OIM, Roma, 2002

CIR Notizie, Mensile del consiglio Italiano per i rifugiati, anni 2005 e 2006

Tiziana Caponio, Dal Programma Nazionale Asilo al Sistema di Protezione

Richiedenti Asilo e Rifugiati (2001-2004), Cespi, Roma, 2004

International Federation for Human Rights, Right of Asylum in Italy: Access to

procedure and treatment of asylum seekers, June 2005,

http://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/eu_asylum419a.pdf

Integ.r.a, Formare, inserire, integrare: strumenti e indicazioni per richiedenti

asilo e rifugiati, Roma, 2004

Marco Catarci, Resource, Il contributo dei rifugiati all’Europa. La ricerca in

italia, ICS, 2005

Quaderni del Centro Astalli, Ricerca Giuridica sugli orientamenti

giurisprudenziali in materia di asilo, Quaderni/4, Roma, Settembre 2003

Servizio centrale del Sistema di Protezione dei richiedenti asilo e rifugiati, Un

rifugio in comune. Schede di sintesi dei progetti territoriali e dati statistici sulle

presenze, Roma, 2004

Servizio centrale del Sistema di Protezione, Manuale operativo per l’attivazione e

la gestione di servizi di accoglienza e integrazione per richiedenti asilo, rifugiati

e beneficiari di protezione umanitaria, Roma, 2005

25

Page 26: Asilo Politico

LIST OF THE MAIN WEB SITES EXAMINED

http://www.serviziocentrale.it/ita/presentazione.asp

http://www.programmanazionaleasilo.it/

www.unhcr.it

http://www.ecre.org/

http://www.icsitalia.org/

http://www.cir-onlus.org/

http://www.integra-anci.it/ita/index.html

http://www.anci.it/sezionihp.cfm?sezione1=Immigrazione%20e%20Diritto%20Asilo

http://www.cestim.it/28rifugiati.htm

26