1

ASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK IN INDONESIA

The 4The 4thth Meeting of th Working Group onMeeting of th Working Group onthe Asian Highway Priority Routesthe Asian Highway Priority Routes

Bangkok, Thailand 27-28 September 2011

2

Introduction:Asian Highway (AH) Routes

Denpasar – Surabaya – Surakarta –Semarang –Cikampek – Jakarta –Merak.Ferry : Ketapang-Gilimanuk

AH-2 :

Banda Aceh – Medan – Dumai –Pekanbaru –Jambi – Palembang –Bakauheni.Ferry : Bakauheni – Merak.

AH-25 :

Non Toll Road 1,128 km.Toll Road 409 km.Ferry 8 km.

Non Toll Road 2,586 kmToll Road - km.Ferry 26 km.

Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway .AH-25 ~ same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.

Banda Aceh

Medan

Dumai

Pekanbaru

Jambi

Palembang

Lampung

Bakauheni

Serang

MerakJakarta

Bandung

Cikampek

Tegal Semarang

SurakartaYogyakarta

Surabaya

Banyuwangi

Denpasar

Menggala

Lhokseumawe

Kisaran

Rantauprapat

Rengat

To Singapore

AH-25

AH-2

Ferry Route

Legend

(Road by AH-Code)

Sibolga

Padang

Batam

Bengkulu

Pangkalpinang

AH - 25

AH - 2

3

Government Policy on Development & Maintenance of AH Routes

Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway .AH-25 ~ same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.

Banda Aceh

Medan

Dumai

Pekanbaru

Jambi

Palembang

Lampung

Bakauheni

Serang

MerakJakarta

Bandung

Cikampek

Tegal Semarang

SurakartaYogyakarta

Surabaya

Banyuwangi

Denpasar

Menggala

Lhokseumawe

Kisaran

Rantauprapat

Rengat

14 m (4 lane)

7 m (2 lane)

6 m ( 2 lane)

Legend

(Road by Minimum Width of Design)

Sibolga

Padang

Batam

Bengkulu

Pangkalpinang

AH - 25

AH - 2

Strategy• The optimization of existing road network and its operation• Widening the links to reach the minimum standard• Quality improvement of the links to desirable service level• The priority will be according to the following order : crossing

border, provision of proper road signs and road marking, technical standard adjustment, road safety and the development of missing links.

Mid-Term National Development Plan•Capacity Expansion of Eastern Trunk Road of Sumatera (where the majority of AH-25 laid on) with minimum width 7 m. •Capacity Expansion of North Coast Trunk Road of Java (where AH-2 laid on from Jakarta to Semarang) with minimum width 14 m. •Capacity Expansion of Middle Trunk Road of Java (where AH-2 laid on from Surakarta to Surabaya) and continue to Banyuwangi via North Coast Trunk Road with minimum width 7m. •Capacity Expansion of Southern Trunk Road of Bali (where AH-2 laid on from Gilimanuk to Denpasar) with minimum width 6 m.

New Policies•Stipulation of eastern trunk road of Sumatera, some parts of North Coast Trunk road of Java and all parts of Southern Trunk Road of Bali as part of Six Economic Corridor•Masterplan of Economic Development Acceleration in Indonesia (MP3EI)

#

Jambi

Medan

Padang

Serang Bandung

JAKARTA

Mataram

Bengkulu

Denpasar

SemarangSurabaya

Palembang

PekanbaruPontianak

Sa

Banda Aceh

Yogyakarta

Banjarmasin

PalangkarayaPangkalpinang

Bandar Lampung

Tanjung Pinang

Current Status of AH NetworkCondition on June 2011

• In General, Road Condition of AH Route are relatively good. More than 93 % are in stable condition which mean there shouldn’t be any obstacle using the road anytime, any weather. The driver may run up to 60 km/hr in flat terrain on uncongested traffic.

• The Fewer bad condition laid on north Sumatera and Pemalang-Tegal, while the other poor laid on Jambi, Southern Sumatera and Cirebon-Brebes.

Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway .AH-25 ~ same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.

AH - 25

AH - 2

Legend

(Road by Average of Condition)

0.001 - 4

4.001 - 8

8.001 - 12

12.001 - 100

Good

Fair

Poor

Bad

Good Fair BadAH2 882.68        618.80        36.01         AH25 968.91        1,445.70    171.74       Grand Total 1,851.58    2,064.50    207.75       

Good Fair BadAH2 57% 40% 2%AH25 37% 56% 7%Grand Total 45% 50% 5%

Condition (Km)AH‐Route

AH‐RouteCondition (%)

*) the data is only covered non-toll road

#

Jambi

Medan

Padang

Serang Bandung

JAKARTA

Mataram

Bengkulu

Denpasar

SemarangSurabaya

Palembang

PekanbaruPontianak

Sa

Banda Aceh

Yogyakarta

Banjarmasin

PalangkarayaPangkalpinang

Bandar Lampung

Tanjung Pinang

Current Status of AH NetworkWidth of Carriage Way on June 2011

• The most advanced route by the capacity point of view, is AH Route No.2 that laid from Merak to Semarang which almost all the road already meet 14 m.

• The Java Island itself, all the road already has minimum width 7 m.

• In order to meet government policy where the eastern trunk road of Sumatera should have minimum width 7 m, there are still several homework which scattered along the route, but the most are Riau and Lampung.

Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway .AH-25 ~ same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.

Legend

(Road by Average of Width of Carriageway)

0.1 - 4.499

4.5 - 5.499

5.5 - 5.999

6 - 6.999

7 - 13.999

14 - 100

< 4.5 m

4.5 – 5.5 m

5.5 – 6 m

6 – 7 m

7 – 14 m

>= 14 m

AH - 25

AH - 2

*) the data is only covered non-toll road

< 4.5 m 4.5 ‐ 6 m 6 ‐ 7 m 7 ‐ 14 m >= 14 mAH2 ‐                      10.57                59.07                600.83              867.01             AH25 1.50                    ‐                     862.84              1,593.44           128.57             Grand Total 1.50                   10.57                921.92              2,194.27           995.58             

< 4.5 m 4.5 ‐ 6 m 6 ‐ 7 m 7 ‐ 14 m >= 14 mAH2 0% 1% 4% 39% 56%AH25 0.1% 0% 33% 62% 5%Grand Total 0% 0% 22% 53% 24%

Carriageway Width (Km)

Carriageway Width (%)

AH‐Route

AH‐Route

Current Status of AH NetworkClassification and Design Standards as June 2011

Major On-Going Projects 2011

#

Jambi

Medan

Mamuju

Padang

Serang Bandung

JAKARTA

Mataram

Bengkulu

Denpasar

Makassar

SemarangSurabaya

Palembang

PekanbaruPontianak

Samarinda

Banda Aceh

Yogyakarta

Banjarmasin

PalangkarayaPangkalpinang

Bandar Lampung

Tanjung Pinang

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 5 - Link No. : 005.1 - Link Name : BTS. KOTA LHOKSEUMAWE - PANTON LABU/SIMPANG (KM 328) - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 45000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 7 - Link No. : 006 - Link Name : BTS. KOTA LANGSA - BTS. PROV. SUMUT - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 45000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 26 - Link No. : 021 - Link Name : PEMATANG REBA - SIBERIDA - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 27450000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 4021109 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 3958500

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 27 - Link No. : 028 - Link Name : BTS. PROV. RIAU - MERLUNG - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 200000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 34 - Link No. : 015 - Link Name : SIMPANG INDRALAYA - MERANJAT - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 7890000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 36 - Link No. : 013.1 - Link Name : BUJUNG TENUK - TERBANGGI BESAR - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 56573430 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- AH Code : AH-2 - AH No. : 29 - Link No. : 013 - Link Name : BTS. KOTA CIREBON - LOSARI (BTS. PROV. JATENG) - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 51569964 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp)AH‐2 10                               95,243,674                 49                              212,578,499               45                              127,167,805              AH‐25 284                             1,209,975,462           22                              77,980,418                 96                              124,717,035              Grand Total 295                             1,305,219,136           71                              290,558,917              140                            251,884,840             

Capacity ExpansionAH‐Code

Betterment/Reconstruction Rehabillitation/Periodic Maint.

g<= 6 Bil Rp

6 - 20 Bil Rp

20 - 45 Bil Rp

45 - 90 Bil Rp

> 90 Bil Rp

g<= 6 Bil Rp

6 - 20 Bil Rp

20 - 45 Bil Rp

45 - 90 Bil Rp

> 90 Bil Rp

Future Priority Projects 2012

#

Jambi

Medan

Mamuju

Padang

Serang Bandung

JAKARTA

Mataram

Bengkulu

Denpasar

Makassar

SemarangSurabaya

Palembang

PekanbaruPontianak

Samarinda

Banda Aceh

Yogyakarta

Banjarmasin

PalangkarayaPangkalpinang

Bandar Lampung

Tanjung Pinang

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 5 - Link No. : 005.2 - Link Name : PANTON LABU - SP PEUREULAK - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 25000000 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 25000000

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 7 - Link No. : 006 - Link Name : LANGSA - BTS.SUMUT - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 51188000

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 30 - Link No. : 002.2 - Link Name : BTS. KODYA (MANDALA) - MUARA BULIAN - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 8901912 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 22500000 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 30000000

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 21 - Link No. : 006.2 - Link Name : KANDIS - DURI - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 3000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 9750000 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 31075000

Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp)AH‐2 57                               258,723,145               145                            535,996,196               69                              109,375,315              AH‐25 163                             683,989,972               70                              250,089,300               85                              170,388,912              Grand Total 220                             942,713,117              215                            786,085,496              154                            279,764,227             

AH‐CodeCapacity Expansion Betterment/Reconstruction Rehabillitation/Periodic Maint.

g<= 6 Bil Rp

6 - 20 Bil Rp

20 - 45 Bil Rp

45 - 90 Bil Rp

> 90 Bil Rp

g<= 6 Bil Rp

6 - 20 Bil Rp

20 - 45 Bil Rp

45 - 90 Bil Rp

> 90 Bil Rp

9

Programme of Road Signs Installation

4.25 BILLION RUPIAH2010 -20112. AH-25 (450 UNIT DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AND 550 UNIT SINGLE SIGNS)

2.5 BILLION RUPIAH2008 - 20091. AH-2 (250 UNIT DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AND 300 UNIT SINGLE SIGNS)

6.75 BILLION RUPIAHTOTAL COST

COST ESTIMATION TIME PLANNED

ASIAN HIGHWAY ROUTE

CIREBON1

PURWAKARTA4 1PRESENTLY INSTALLED

AH2CIREBON1

PURWAKARTA4

AH2

AH2 AH25

PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED

10

Sample of Installed Directional Signs

ROUTE NUMBERING

IN INDONESIA

National Road Safety Master Plan (NRSMP) 2011 – 2035

AH‐Code RSA Blackspot TotalAH‐2 9 13 22AH‐25 2 14 16

In the road design projects, Directorate General of Highway (DGH) has been considering safety, such as on EINRIP projects and SRIP projects as part of National Road Safety Master Plan (NRSMP) 2011 – 2035.

Following the step above, DGH has been carrying out Road Safety Audit (RSA) including in detailed design stage, road work, and pre-opening stage.Road safety audit identified a range of issues that will potentially affect the safety of users of the road when the works are completed.

DGH has the Strategic Plan to reduce the number of hazardous locations in Indonesia. Directorate General of Highways (DGH) have done Crash Reduction Investigation and prepared the countermeasures to address road safety issues at the East Corridor in Sumatra (Bakauheni to Banda Aceh via Palembang) and the North Coast Road in Java (Cilegon to Banyuwangi via Jakarta and Surabaya). Respectively these corridors are 1800 Km and 1200 Km long. DGH had collect crash data from Indonesian National Traffic Police before doing the investigation.

Monitoring Road Safety Audit And Blackspot Investigation Report

Concluding Remarks

• Asian Highway in Indonesia at this time continues to progress and is expected to reach the target at the end of 2014, where the AH-25 will have a standard class II and AH-2 of the Merak-Cikampek already be Primary class, Cikampek-Semarang as Class I and Semarang-Surabaya-Banywangi as Class II and Gilimanuk Denpasar as Class III.

• Various development cooperation and the improvement of road infrastructure needs to be done to accelerate the achievement of standards

• Asian highway network availability is less meaningful without being followed by various facilities in co-operation of traffic and inter-modal transportation.

13

Thank You for Your Attention