here

here

Galatasaray and Paris Saint Germainhave successfully appealed decisions,rendered by the UEFA AdjudicatoryChamber against the clubs, to havepreviously closed FFP cases re-openedfor further investigation into the clubs'compliance with FFP Regulations. The clubs successfully argued thatArticle 16(1) of the UEFA CFCBProcedural Rules only allows for a 10day review of a decision. In both cases,UEFA had taken the decision to reviewthe original judgments out with the 10day period. The CAS Panel held that the 10-day timelimit runs from the date ofcommunication of the original decision.As such, the decision to re-open thecases were untimely, in both cases, andthus must be annulled.

here

here

here

Inconsistent handling by Regulatory

Commission sees win for the FA

Legitimate Expectation argument

fails

herehere

Clubs under the microscope

Education of Players

here.

here

L I S T O F I N T E R M E D I A R I E SS U S P E N D E D B Y T H E F A

A M E N D M E N T S T O F A W O R K I N G W I T HI N T E R M E D I A R I E S R E G U L A T I O N S

The Dons Dram - Reputation and confusion

here

Neymar Jnr - Determining bad faith

here

Spanish match-fixing probe

Former AFF President banned forlife

Football Club Director: Betting

INTERPOL

here

Mandatory implementation of domestic TMS

FIFA Football Law 2019 Presentations

Protect the Integrity of Football

Categorisation of Clubs for TC purposes

FIFA TMS Monthly Insights

FIFA RSTP (June 2019)

ECA Player Release Analysis: WWC2019

Procedural Rules governing UEFA CFCB (June2019)

Amendments to FIFA RSTP

Introduction of anti-discrimination measures