asce seattle cozumel
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
1/68
Cozumels International Cruise TerminalCozumels International Cruise Terminal
Hurricane Wilma Recovery and ReconstructionHurricane Wilma Recovery and Reconstruction
John Bardi, P.E.John Bardi, P.E.
andand
Bruce Ostbo, PE, SEBruce Ostbo, PE, SE
BERGER/ABAM EngineersBERGER/ABAM Engineers
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
2/68
Most intense Atlantic storm on
record, wind speeds >175
mph, 882 millibars pressure
At time of landfall, wind speed
approximately 140 mph
(Category 4)
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
3/68
Project Site with Hurricane Wilma 2005 Track
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
4/68
28 October - Mrida to Playa del Carmen by Car
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
5/68
After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
6/68
After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
7/68
After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
8/68
After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
9/68
After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
10/68
23 October 2005 End of Storm
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
11/68
Aerial Damage Survey
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
12/68
Approach Before Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
13/68
Approach After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
14/68
Approach Before Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
15/68
Approach After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
16/68
Approach After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
17/68
Approach After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
18/68
Deck Damage
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
19/68
Deck Damage
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
20/68
Pile Support - Before Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
21/68
Pile Support - After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
22/68
Pile Support - After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
23/68
Domino Effect from Loss of Diaphragm
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
24/68
Domino Effect from Loss of Diaphragm
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
25/68
Domino Effect from Loss of Diaphragm
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
26/68
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
27/68
Micropiles and Grout in Newer Section
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
28/68
Dovela Damage
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
29/68
Dovela Damage
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
30/68
Scour
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
31/68
Mooring / Breasting Dolphin Before Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
32/68
Mooring / Breasting Dolphin Before Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
33/68
Mooring / Breasting Dolphin After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
34/68
Mooring / Breasting Dolphin After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
35/68
Mooring / Breasting Dolphin After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
36/68
Mooring / Breasting Dolphin After Wilma
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
37/68
Tender Pier Destroyed
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
38/68
Polluted Water
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
39/68
Free Medicinal Supplies
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
40/68
Multi-talented Team
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
41/68
Summary of Damage
Sh t T R i
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
42/68
Short-Term Repairs
First priority: Approach pier repairs to restore
tendering service
Second priority: Cruise pier repairs to allow limited
berthing of smaller vessels
Provisional berthing required careful analysis ofmooring loads and pier capacity
Passenger safety and perception required
temporary deck reconstruction
Sh T R i
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
43/68
Short-Term Repairs
T i l Sh t T R i
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
44/68
Typical Short-Term Repairs
C l Pil B k
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
45/68
Cozumel Pile Buck
R i t Li it d S i
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
46/68
Reopening to Limited Service
The facility was reopened forberthing along the outer face
within approximately 5 months
L T O ti
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
47/68
Long-Term Operation
Reconstructed mooring dolphin to restore
original service
Second mooring dolphin to allow for larger
vessels
Final mooring loads, including larger vessels New uplift load criteria
Enhanced deck strength to resist wave loads
and provide diaphragm action
L T R i P d O ti
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
48/68
Long-Term Repair: Proposed Option
L T R i S l t d O ti
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
49/68
Long-Term Repair: Selected Option
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
50/68
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
51/68
Construction Phasing Cruise Pier
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
52/68
Construction Phasing Cruise Pier
Construction Phasing Approach Pier
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
53/68
Construction Phasing Approach Pier
Wave Analysis and Uplift Force Design Criteria
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
54/68
Deepwater wave design criteria
Data compilation, statistical analysis
Project site (shallow water) wave design criteria
Numerical modeling
Model validation Design scenarios
Uplift forces
Numerical modeling
Engineering (empirical) analysis
Recommendations
y p g
Methodology and Approach
Offshore Extreme Wave Climate Analysis
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
55/68
Offshore Extreme Wave Climate Analysis
Hurricane Wilma
Hurricane Gilbert
Deepwater Wave Parameters
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
56/68
Hurricane Wilma, Offshore: Hs = 11.0 m, Tp = 12.9 s,
Dir = 120 deg True North, Wind speed = 31 m/s
Hurricane Gilbert, Offshore: Hs= 13.2 m, Tp=13.4 s,
Dir = 45 degrees True North
Deepwater Wave Parameters
Location of Nearshore Gauge
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
57/68
Location of Nearshore Gauge
Hurricane Wilma Measured Wave Heights
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
58/68
0
0
0
0
0
00
00
/0000 /0000 /0000 /0000 /0000 /0000 /0000 /0000
Date & Time (UTC)
SignificantW
aveHeight(m)
Offshore
Nearshore
Offshore vs Nearshore GagesNearshore Gauge
Wave Transformation Large Modeling Domain
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
59/68
Verification with Field Data
Domain #1
Measured: Hs = 11.0 m
Measured Direction =120
Modeled: Hs = 11.1 m
Modeled Direction =119
Wave Transformation Modeling Domain
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
60/68
Hurricane Wilma Hurricane Gilbert
Hurricane Wilma and Gilbert
Hs= 3.5 m
T= 7.4 s.
Hs= 0.9 m
T= 13.4 s.
Pier Plan View
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
61/68
Deck portion used for wave loading calculation
Pier Plan View
Uplift Wave Force Methodology
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
62/68
Uplift Wave Force Methodology
Empirical
Kaplan P., Murray J.J. & Yu W.C. - 1995
Cuomo G., Tirindelli M. & Allsop W. - 2005
Numerical: 1-Dimensional Numerical
Model (VOF technigue) incompressible
fluid with free surface
Cuomo & Tirindelli Method
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
63/68
Cuomo & Tirindelli Method
Numerical Modeling Method
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
64/68
Numerical Modeling Method
Dynes/cm2
Wave Loading Design Criteria
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
65/68
-000
-000
0
000
000
000
000
00 11 00 00 00 11 00 11
Time (s)
UpliftLoad
(lbs/ft0)
MONGOOSEKaplanCuomo & Tirindelli impact
Cuomo & Tirindelli downward
Existing Pier Results of Computations
ModelKaplan
Wave Loading Design Criteria
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
66/68
Influence of Down-Standing Beams
Recommended Wave Uplift Loading
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
67/68
Existing Pier Proposed Pier Tender Pier
Load Type Kaplan C&T Kaplan C&T Kaplan C&T
Impact Fmax
575 lbs/ft2 820 lbs/ft2 590 lbs/ft2 740 lbs/ft2 440 lbs/ft2 910 lbs/ft2
Quasi Static Fqs+
90 tons 165 tons 100 tons 150 tons 70 tons 110 tons
Quasi static Fqs-
-100 tons -130 tons -90 tons -115 tons -45 tons -90 tons
Recommended Wave Uplift Loading
Design Criteria
ConclusionConclusion
-
7/31/2019 ASCE Seattle Cozumel
68/68
ConclusionConclusion
Project currently scheduled to be completed inProject currently scheduled to be completed in
May 2007May 2007 Lessons-learned from wave analysis andLessons-learned from wave analysis and
modeling will be incorporated on future projectsmodeling will be incorporated on future projects