arts intercultural communication dr nadine normand-marconnet caulfield – global connections...
TRANSCRIPT
Arts
Intercultural Communication
Dr Nadine Normand-MarconnetCaulfield – Global Connections session9th March 2015
2
Definition of culture
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
Lustig, M., Koester, J. (2013, 7th ed.) Intercultural Competence. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson Prentice Hall Pearson. (p.26)
Beliefs
Basic understanding of a group of people about what the world is like or
what is true or false
Values
What a group of people defines as good and ad
or what it regards as important
Norms
Rules for appropriate behavior, which provide the expectations people
have of one antoher and of themselves
Social Practices
The predictable behavior patterns that members of a culture
typically follow
3
Definition of ‘intercultural challenge’
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
The ‘intercultural challenge iceberg’, from Pamela Kittler, Food and Culture ( 2001, 3rd ed.)
Race
Gender
Age
Nationality
Acculturation/assimilation
Socioeconomics status
Occupation
Health condition
Religion
Sexual preference
Group membership
Educational background
Political orientation
4
Definition of Intercultural Communication
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
Intercultural communication is a symbolic, interpretative, transactional, contextual process in which people from different cultures create shared meanings. (Lustig & Koester, 2013:43)
Intercultural communication occurs when large and important cultural differences create dissimilar interpretations and expectations about how to communicate competently. (Lustig & Koester, 2013 :48)
A situation where people from different cultural backgrounds come into contact with each other; or a
subject of study that is concerned with interactions among people of different cultural and ethnic groups
and comparative studies of communication patterns across cultures (Zhu Hua, 2011: 422)
5
Cross-cultural or intercultural communication?
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
Cross-cultural communication
Compares and contrasts native discourse and communication styles /behaviours in different
cultures
E.g. : behaviour of business students in case discussion in Saudia Arabia behaviour of
business students in case discussion in Malaysia
Intercultural communication
Involves an investigation of interpersonal interaction
between individual (or groups) from diverse linguistic and
cultural background.
E.g. : a South Korean student in Seoul interacting in English with
an exchange student from Sweden
(Jackson, 2014: 3)
6
Reasons to study IC
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
The study of Intercultural communication is bout acquiring the necessary knowledge and dynamic skills to manage differences appropriately and
effectively. It is also about developing a creative mind-set to see things from different angles without rigid pre-judgement. (Ting-Toomey & Chung, 2005: 3)
Imperative for learning more about IC?
Globalisation
Internationalisation
Communication/transportation technologies
Demographic changes
Conflict and Peace
Ethics
Personal skills (self-awareness, creative problem solving, etc.)
7
E.T. Hall (1976): Three dimensions of cultural difference
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
- Monochronic-polychronic time
- Low-high context of communication
- Use of personal space
Unambiguous and straightforward messages
Direct communication
Monochronistic
LOW CONTEXT CULTURES
Individualistic oriented cultures
Meaning comes from context, not from words
Indirect communication
Polychronistic
HIGH CONTEXT CULTURES
Collectivist oriented cultures
8
Activity 3: where do you place UK, Malaysia and Australia in this triangle illustrating cultural types? Follow the colour code.
Multi-active
Linear-active
Reactive
Brazil, Chile, Mexico
India
Vietnam
Canada
Belgium, Israel
Germany, Switzerland
Red = multi-active – warm, emotional, loquacious, impulsive
Blue = linear-active – cool, factual, decisive planners
Yellow = reactive – courteous, amiable, accommodating, compromiser, good listener
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
The Lewis Model: http://www.crossculture.com/services/cross-culture/
9Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
The Lewis Model
http://www.crossculture.com/services/cross-culture
10
Geert Hofstede’s Six dimensions of country level cultural variation (1991)
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
Power distance: the extent to which the less powerful members of institutions ad organisations within a country expect and accept that the power is distributed unequally.
Individualism: the degree of interdependence a society maintains among its members.
Masculinity: what motivates people, wanting to be the best (masculine) or liking what they do (feminine).
http:// geert-hofstede.com
11
Geert Hofstede’s Six dimensions of country level cultural variation (1991)
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
Pragmatism: how every society has to maintain some links with its own past while dealing with the challenges of the present and future.
Indulgence: the extent to which people try to control their desires and impulses.
Uncertainty avoidance: the extent to which the members of a culture feel threatened by ambiguous or unknown situations and have created beliefs and institutions that try to avoid this.
12
Activity 4 : How can you interpret this draft? (Use Communication across Cultures selected reading to help you)
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
13
Interpretation (1/3)
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
Power distance: At 35 Britain sits in the lower rankings of PDI – i.e. a society that believes that inequalities amongst people should be minimized. Interestingly is that research shows PD index lower amongst the higher class in Britain than amongst the working classes. The PDI score at first seems incongruent with the well established and historical British class system and its exposes one of the inherent tensions in the British culture – between the importance of birth rank on the one hand and a deep seated belief that where you are born should not limit how far you can travel in life. A sense of fair play drives a belief that people should be treated in some way as equals.
Individualism: At a score of 89 the UK is amongst the highest of the individualistic scores, beaten only by some of the commonwealth countries it spawned i.e. Australia and the USA. The British are a highly individualistic and private people. Children are taught from an early age to think for themselves and to find out what their unique purpose in life is and how they uniquely can contribute to society. The route to happiness is through personal fulfillment. As the affluence of Britain has increased throughout the last decade, with wealth also ‘spreading North’, a much discussed phenomenon is the rise of what has been seen as rampant consumerism and a strengthening of the ‘ME’ culture.
14
Interpretation (2/3)
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
Masculinity: At 66, Britain is a masculine society – highly success oriented and driven. A key point of confusion for the foreigner lies in the apparent contradiction between the British culture of modesty and understatement which is at odds with the underlying success driven value system in the culture. Critical to understanding the British is being able to ‘’read between the lines’’ What is said is not always what is meant. In comparison to feminine cultures such as the Scandinavian countries, people in the UK live in order to work and have a clear performance ambition.
Incertainty avoidance: At 35 the UK has a low score on uncertainty avoidance which means that as a nation they are quite happy to wake up not knowing what the day brings and they are happy to ‘make it up as they go along’ changing plans as new information comes to light. As a low UAI country the British are comfortable in ambiguous situations - the term ‘muddling through’ is a very British way of expressing this. There are generally not too many rules in British society, but those that are there are adhered to (the most famous of which of course the British love of queuing which has also to do with the values of fair play).
15
Interpretation (3/3)
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
Pragmatism: With an intermediate score of 51 in this dimension, a dominant preference in British culture cannot be determined.
Indulgence: A high score of 69 indicates that the British culture is one that is classified as indulgent. People in societies classified by a high score in indulgence generally exhibit a willingness to realise their impulses and desires with regard to enjoying life and having fun. They possess a positive attitude and have a tendency towards optimism. In addition, they place a higher degree of importance on leisure time, act as they please and spend money as they wish.
16
Communication styles
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
Linear
Development of an argument
Explicit
Straightforward logic
‘The point’
Circular
All contextual elements
Make listeners understanding
Length
No ‘point ‘
Direct
Message = within the words
Priority to the content
Speak ‘honestly’
Indirect
Message= in a variety of elements (silence, proverbs)
Priority to relationships
Sensitive to the complexity
17
Linear / Circular communication style
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
Linear Style => Circular Circular style => Linear
Be patient, stop waiting for the point
Listen to interpret
Relationships matter
Ask question
Listen to synthesise and reformulate
Select and choose
Suggestions for improving intercultural communication across styles
Direct Style => Indirect Indirect Style => Direct
Look behind words
Learn to use metaphors, proverbs
Practice diplomacy
Try not to feel attacked
Prefer facts to metaphors
Say exactly what you mean
http:// www.cinfo.ch
18
References
Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015
Jackson, J. (2014). Introducing Language and Intercultural Communication. New York: Routledge
Lustig, M., Koester, J. (2013, 7th ed.) Intercultural Competence. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson Prentice Hall Pearson. (p.26)
Spencer-Oatey, H., Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural Interaction. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Ting-Toomey, S. , Chung. L.C. (2005). Understanding Intercultural Communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zhu Hua (2011). Glossary, in Zhu Hua (ed.). The Language and Intercultural Communication Reader. Abington: Routledge, 418-425.