arts intercultural communication dr nadine normand-marconnet caulfield – global connections...

18
Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

Upload: jerome-allison

Post on 17-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

Arts

Intercultural Communication

Dr Nadine Normand-MarconnetCaulfield – Global Connections session9th March 2015

Page 2: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

2

Definition of culture

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

Lustig, M., Koester, J. (2013, 7th ed.) Intercultural Competence. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson Prentice Hall Pearson. (p.26)

Beliefs

Basic understanding of a group of people about what the world is like or

what is true or false

Values

What a group of people defines as good and ad

or what it regards as important

Norms

Rules for appropriate behavior, which provide the expectations people

have of one antoher and of themselves

Social Practices

The predictable behavior patterns that members of a culture

typically follow

Page 3: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

3

Definition of ‘intercultural challenge’

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

The ‘intercultural challenge iceberg’, from Pamela Kittler, Food and Culture ( 2001, 3rd ed.)

Race

Gender

Age

Nationality

Acculturation/assimilation

Socioeconomics status

Occupation

Health condition

Religion

Sexual preference

Group membership

Educational background

Political orientation

Page 4: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

4

Definition of Intercultural Communication

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

Intercultural communication is a symbolic, interpretative, transactional, contextual process in which people from different cultures create shared meanings. (Lustig & Koester, 2013:43)

Intercultural communication occurs when large and important cultural differences create dissimilar interpretations and expectations about how to communicate competently. (Lustig & Koester, 2013 :48)

A situation where people from different cultural backgrounds come into contact with each other; or a

subject of study that is concerned with interactions among people of different cultural and ethnic groups

and comparative studies of communication patterns across cultures (Zhu Hua, 2011: 422)

Page 5: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

5

Cross-cultural or intercultural communication?

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

Cross-cultural communication

Compares and contrasts native discourse and communication styles /behaviours in different

cultures

E.g. : behaviour of business students in case discussion in Saudia Arabia behaviour of

business students in case discussion in Malaysia

Intercultural communication

Involves an investigation of interpersonal interaction

between individual (or groups) from diverse linguistic and

cultural background.

E.g. : a South Korean student in Seoul interacting in English with

an exchange student from Sweden

(Jackson, 2014: 3)

Page 6: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

6

Reasons to study IC

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

The study of Intercultural communication is bout acquiring the necessary knowledge and dynamic skills to manage differences appropriately and

effectively. It is also about developing a creative mind-set to see things from different angles without rigid pre-judgement. (Ting-Toomey & Chung, 2005: 3)

Imperative for learning more about IC?

Globalisation

Internationalisation

Communication/transportation technologies

Demographic changes

Conflict and Peace

Ethics

Personal skills (self-awareness, creative problem solving, etc.)

Page 7: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

7

E.T. Hall (1976): Three dimensions of cultural difference

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

- Monochronic-polychronic time

- Low-high context of communication

- Use of personal space

Unambiguous and straightforward messages

Direct communication

Monochronistic

LOW CONTEXT CULTURES

Individualistic oriented cultures

Meaning comes from context, not from words

Indirect communication

Polychronistic

HIGH CONTEXT CULTURES

Collectivist oriented cultures

Page 8: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

8

Activity 3: where do you place UK, Malaysia and Australia in this triangle illustrating cultural types? Follow the colour code.

Multi-active

Linear-active

Reactive

Brazil, Chile, Mexico

India

Vietnam

Canada

Belgium, Israel

Germany, Switzerland

Red = multi-active – warm, emotional, loquacious, impulsive

Blue = linear-active – cool, factual, decisive planners

Yellow = reactive – courteous, amiable, accommodating, compromiser, good listener

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

The Lewis Model: http://www.crossculture.com/services/cross-culture/

Page 9: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

9Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

The Lewis Model

http://www.crossculture.com/services/cross-culture

Page 10: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

10

Geert Hofstede’s Six dimensions of country level cultural variation (1991)

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

Power distance: the extent to which the less powerful members of institutions ad organisations within a country expect and accept that the power is distributed unequally.

Individualism: the degree of interdependence a society maintains among its members.

Masculinity: what motivates people, wanting to be the best (masculine) or liking what they do (feminine).

http:// geert-hofstede.com

Page 11: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

11

Geert Hofstede’s Six dimensions of country level cultural variation (1991)

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

Pragmatism: how every society has to maintain some links with its own past while dealing with the challenges of the present and future.

Indulgence: the extent to which people try to control their desires and impulses.

Uncertainty avoidance: the extent to which the members of a culture feel threatened by ambiguous or unknown situations and have created beliefs and institutions that try to avoid this.

Page 12: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

12

Activity 4 : How can you interpret this draft? (Use Communication across Cultures selected reading to help you)

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

Page 13: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

13

Interpretation (1/3)

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

Power distance: At 35 Britain sits in the lower rankings of PDI – i.e. a society that believes that inequalities amongst people should be minimized. Interestingly is that research shows PD index lower amongst the higher class in Britain than amongst the working classes. The PDI score at first seems incongruent with the well established and historical British class system and its exposes one of the inherent tensions in the British culture – between the importance of birth rank on the one hand and a deep seated belief that where you are born should not limit how far you can travel in life. A sense of fair play drives a belief that people should be treated in some way as equals.

Individualism: At a score of 89 the UK is amongst the highest of the individualistic scores, beaten only by some of the commonwealth countries it spawned i.e. Australia and the USA. The British are a highly individualistic and private people. Children are taught from an early age to think for themselves and to find out what their unique purpose in life is and how they uniquely can contribute to society. The route to happiness is through personal fulfillment. As the affluence of Britain has increased throughout the last decade, with wealth  also ‘spreading North’, a much discussed phenomenon is the rise of what has been seen as rampant consumerism and a strengthening of the ‘ME’ culture.

Page 14: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

14

Interpretation (2/3)

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

Masculinity: At 66, Britain is a masculine society – highly success oriented and driven. A key point of confusion for the foreigner lies in the apparent contradiction between the British culture of modesty and understatement which is at odds with the underlying success driven value system in the culture. Critical to understanding the British is being able to ‘’read between the lines’’ What is said is not always what is meant. In comparison to feminine cultures such as the Scandinavian countries, people in the UK live in order to work and have a clear performance ambition.

Incertainty avoidance: At 35 the UK has a low score on uncertainty avoidance which means that as a nation they are quite happy to wake up not knowing what the day brings and they are happy to ‘make it up as they go along’ changing plans as new information comes to light. As a low UAI country the British are comfortable in ambiguous situations - the term ‘muddling through’ is a very British way of expressing this. There are generally not too many rules in British society, but those that are there are adhered to (the most famous of which of course the British love of queuing which has also to do with the values of fair play).

Page 15: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

15

Interpretation (3/3)

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

Pragmatism: With an intermediate score of 51 in this dimension, a dominant preference in British culture cannot be determined.

Indulgence: A high score of 69 indicates that the British culture is one that is classified as indulgent. People in societies classified by a high score in indulgence generally exhibit a willingness to realise their impulses and desires with regard to enjoying life and having fun. They possess a positive attitude and have a tendency towards optimism. In addition, they place a higher degree of importance on leisure time, act as they please and spend money as they wish.

Page 16: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

16

Communication styles

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

Linear

Development of an argument

Explicit

Straightforward logic

‘The point’

Circular

All contextual elements

Make listeners understanding

Length

No ‘point ‘

Direct

Message = within the words

Priority to the content

Speak ‘honestly’

Indirect

Message= in a variety of elements (silence, proverbs)

Priority to relationships

Sensitive to the complexity

Page 17: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

17

Linear / Circular communication style

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

Linear Style => Circular Circular style => Linear

Be patient, stop waiting for the point

Listen to interpret

Relationships matter

Ask question

Listen to synthesise and reformulate

Select and choose

Suggestions for improving intercultural communication across styles

Direct Style => Indirect Indirect Style => Direct

Look behind words

Learn to use metaphors, proverbs

Practice diplomacy

Try not to feel attacked

Prefer facts to metaphors

Say exactly what you mean

http:// www.cinfo.ch

Page 18: Arts Intercultural Communication Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet Caulfield – Global Connections session 9 th March 2015

18

References

Dr Nadine Normand-Marconnet, Global Connections, 9/3/2015

Jackson, J. (2014). Introducing Language and Intercultural Communication. New York: Routledge

Lustig, M., Koester, J. (2013, 7th ed.) Intercultural Competence. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson Prentice Hall Pearson. (p.26)

Spencer-Oatey, H., Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural Interaction. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave McMillan.

Ting-Toomey, S. , Chung. L.C. (2005). Understanding Intercultural Communication. New York: Oxford University Press.

Zhu Hua (2011). Glossary, in Zhu Hua (ed.). The Language and Intercultural Communication Reader. Abington: Routledge, 418-425.