artrite psoriasica: strategie terapeutiche tra … · artrite psoriasica: strategie terapeutiche...

50
ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Upload: hoangquynh

Post on 30-Jun-2019

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE

TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTURO

Mauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena

Le Spondiloartriti

Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition

Psoriatic arthritis is a manifestation of psoriatic disease

characterized by inflammatory involvement of

entheses joints and bone which may affect both peripheral and axial

articular compartment

PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)

EAM Prevalence () Uveitisiridocyclitis 30-40IBD 20-35Subclinical IBD 20-80Cutaneous involvement 70-80

Nail involvement 80

Crohn diseaseUveitis Psoriasis Psoriatic onychopathy

PsA ndash Comorbidities 1 CVDHypertension2 Obesity3 Diabetes4 DyslipidemiaHyperuricemia5 Metabolic Syndrome6 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

(NAFLD)7 Fibromyalgia8 Neurological manifestations9 AnxietyDepression

EAM and Comorbidities must be investigated and treated with

multidisciplinary approach

Patients with psoriatic arthritis are at

greater risk of death compared to the

general populationWong K et al Arthritis Rheum 1997401868ndash72

How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic population

The importance of Dermatologistto early Referral to

Rheumatologist

CASPAR Classification criteria for PsASensibilitagrave 098 specificitagrave 097

Taylor et sl Arthritis Rheum 2006 Aug54(8)2665-73

1 Inflammatory articular disease (joint spine enthesial) plus ge 1 of the following findings

Scorecurrent (2) history (1) or family history (1)

(1)

(1)

current or history of (1)

juxta-articular new bone formation other than osteophytes (1)

Tab CIassification criteria for Psoriasic ARthritis (CASPAR)5

Findings2 Psoriasis

3 Nail dystrophy

4 Negative rheumatoid factor

5 Dactylitis

6 Radiographic changes (hand and foot)

PSA = 1 + gt 3 scores of the categories 2-6

bullSensitivity 99 either at 1 or at 7 years of diseasebullTheir use in practice for the diagnosis of ePsA is not yet validated

EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA

The EARP questionnaire is simple and fast to administer and proved robust for the identification of PsA in the

dermatological setting Dermatologists should consider the EARP for patients

Treat-to-target in PsA

bull Targetndash the best possible disease clinical control in that patient (ideally

remission or at least minimal disease activity)ndash no anatomical damage

ndash good quality of life Comprehensive Disease Control

bull Definition of clinical remissionndash biological definition no inflammationndash surrogates of biological remission eg PASDAS lt32

bull Methods to achieve the target as early as possiblendash early diagnosis (window of opportunity)ndash tight controlndash proper treatment individualized therapy

DMARDs for PsA

bull TNF-α inhibitorsndash infliximabndash etanerceptndash adalimumabndash golimumabndash certolizumab pegol

bull Biosimilarsndash bs-infliximabndash bs-etanercept

bull csDMARDsndash methotrexatendash sulphasalazinendash leflunomidendash cyclosporin A

bull Anti-IL17 pathwayndash ustekinumab (anti-IL23IL12)ndash guselkumab and tildrakizumabndash brodalumabndash secukinumabndash ixekizumab

bull tsDMARDsndash apremilastndash tofacitinib

bull Others bDMARDsndash abatacept

bull Investigational drugsndash many others

1 Gately MK et al Annu Rev Immunol 199816495-521 2 Wilson NJ et al Nat Immunol 20078(9)950-7 3 Nickoloff BJ Nestle FO J Clin Invest 2004113(12)1664-75 4 Nestle FO et al J Invest Dermatol 2004 123xiv-xxv

TNF-αIFN-γ

TNF-αIL-17IL-22

T cell

Differentiation and clonal expansionof Th1 and Th17

subsets is prevented

Antibody binds to the p40 subunit of IL-12 and

IL-23 preventing binding to their cell surface

receptors

Th1

Th17

Down-regulationof inflammatory

cytokines

Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab

USTEKINUMABSTELARA

La posologia Con o senza MTX dose iniziale di 45 mg somministrata per via sottocutanea seguita da una dose di 45 mg dopo 4 settimane e successivamente ogni 12 settimane In pazienti con un peso superiore a 100 kg la dose egrave di 90 mg

Interruzione del trattamento Non risposta al trattamento di 28 settimane

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 2: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Le Spondiloartriti

Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition

Psoriatic arthritis is a manifestation of psoriatic disease

characterized by inflammatory involvement of

entheses joints and bone which may affect both peripheral and axial

articular compartment

PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)

EAM Prevalence () Uveitisiridocyclitis 30-40IBD 20-35Subclinical IBD 20-80Cutaneous involvement 70-80

Nail involvement 80

Crohn diseaseUveitis Psoriasis Psoriatic onychopathy

PsA ndash Comorbidities 1 CVDHypertension2 Obesity3 Diabetes4 DyslipidemiaHyperuricemia5 Metabolic Syndrome6 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

(NAFLD)7 Fibromyalgia8 Neurological manifestations9 AnxietyDepression

EAM and Comorbidities must be investigated and treated with

multidisciplinary approach

Patients with psoriatic arthritis are at

greater risk of death compared to the

general populationWong K et al Arthritis Rheum 1997401868ndash72

How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic population

The importance of Dermatologistto early Referral to

Rheumatologist

CASPAR Classification criteria for PsASensibilitagrave 098 specificitagrave 097

Taylor et sl Arthritis Rheum 2006 Aug54(8)2665-73

1 Inflammatory articular disease (joint spine enthesial) plus ge 1 of the following findings

Scorecurrent (2) history (1) or family history (1)

(1)

(1)

current or history of (1)

juxta-articular new bone formation other than osteophytes (1)

Tab CIassification criteria for Psoriasic ARthritis (CASPAR)5

Findings2 Psoriasis

3 Nail dystrophy

4 Negative rheumatoid factor

5 Dactylitis

6 Radiographic changes (hand and foot)

PSA = 1 + gt 3 scores of the categories 2-6

bullSensitivity 99 either at 1 or at 7 years of diseasebullTheir use in practice for the diagnosis of ePsA is not yet validated

EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA

The EARP questionnaire is simple and fast to administer and proved robust for the identification of PsA in the

dermatological setting Dermatologists should consider the EARP for patients

Treat-to-target in PsA

bull Targetndash the best possible disease clinical control in that patient (ideally

remission or at least minimal disease activity)ndash no anatomical damage

ndash good quality of life Comprehensive Disease Control

bull Definition of clinical remissionndash biological definition no inflammationndash surrogates of biological remission eg PASDAS lt32

bull Methods to achieve the target as early as possiblendash early diagnosis (window of opportunity)ndash tight controlndash proper treatment individualized therapy

DMARDs for PsA

bull TNF-α inhibitorsndash infliximabndash etanerceptndash adalimumabndash golimumabndash certolizumab pegol

bull Biosimilarsndash bs-infliximabndash bs-etanercept

bull csDMARDsndash methotrexatendash sulphasalazinendash leflunomidendash cyclosporin A

bull Anti-IL17 pathwayndash ustekinumab (anti-IL23IL12)ndash guselkumab and tildrakizumabndash brodalumabndash secukinumabndash ixekizumab

bull tsDMARDsndash apremilastndash tofacitinib

bull Others bDMARDsndash abatacept

bull Investigational drugsndash many others

1 Gately MK et al Annu Rev Immunol 199816495-521 2 Wilson NJ et al Nat Immunol 20078(9)950-7 3 Nickoloff BJ Nestle FO J Clin Invest 2004113(12)1664-75 4 Nestle FO et al J Invest Dermatol 2004 123xiv-xxv

TNF-αIFN-γ

TNF-αIL-17IL-22

T cell

Differentiation and clonal expansionof Th1 and Th17

subsets is prevented

Antibody binds to the p40 subunit of IL-12 and

IL-23 preventing binding to their cell surface

receptors

Th1

Th17

Down-regulationof inflammatory

cytokines

Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab

USTEKINUMABSTELARA

La posologia Con o senza MTX dose iniziale di 45 mg somministrata per via sottocutanea seguita da una dose di 45 mg dopo 4 settimane e successivamente ogni 12 settimane In pazienti con un peso superiore a 100 kg la dose egrave di 90 mg

Interruzione del trattamento Non risposta al trattamento di 28 settimane

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 3: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition

Psoriatic arthritis is a manifestation of psoriatic disease

characterized by inflammatory involvement of

entheses joints and bone which may affect both peripheral and axial

articular compartment

PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)

EAM Prevalence () Uveitisiridocyclitis 30-40IBD 20-35Subclinical IBD 20-80Cutaneous involvement 70-80

Nail involvement 80

Crohn diseaseUveitis Psoriasis Psoriatic onychopathy

PsA ndash Comorbidities 1 CVDHypertension2 Obesity3 Diabetes4 DyslipidemiaHyperuricemia5 Metabolic Syndrome6 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

(NAFLD)7 Fibromyalgia8 Neurological manifestations9 AnxietyDepression

EAM and Comorbidities must be investigated and treated with

multidisciplinary approach

Patients with psoriatic arthritis are at

greater risk of death compared to the

general populationWong K et al Arthritis Rheum 1997401868ndash72

How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic population

The importance of Dermatologistto early Referral to

Rheumatologist

CASPAR Classification criteria for PsASensibilitagrave 098 specificitagrave 097

Taylor et sl Arthritis Rheum 2006 Aug54(8)2665-73

1 Inflammatory articular disease (joint spine enthesial) plus ge 1 of the following findings

Scorecurrent (2) history (1) or family history (1)

(1)

(1)

current or history of (1)

juxta-articular new bone formation other than osteophytes (1)

Tab CIassification criteria for Psoriasic ARthritis (CASPAR)5

Findings2 Psoriasis

3 Nail dystrophy

4 Negative rheumatoid factor

5 Dactylitis

6 Radiographic changes (hand and foot)

PSA = 1 + gt 3 scores of the categories 2-6

bullSensitivity 99 either at 1 or at 7 years of diseasebullTheir use in practice for the diagnosis of ePsA is not yet validated

EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA

The EARP questionnaire is simple and fast to administer and proved robust for the identification of PsA in the

dermatological setting Dermatologists should consider the EARP for patients

Treat-to-target in PsA

bull Targetndash the best possible disease clinical control in that patient (ideally

remission or at least minimal disease activity)ndash no anatomical damage

ndash good quality of life Comprehensive Disease Control

bull Definition of clinical remissionndash biological definition no inflammationndash surrogates of biological remission eg PASDAS lt32

bull Methods to achieve the target as early as possiblendash early diagnosis (window of opportunity)ndash tight controlndash proper treatment individualized therapy

DMARDs for PsA

bull TNF-α inhibitorsndash infliximabndash etanerceptndash adalimumabndash golimumabndash certolizumab pegol

bull Biosimilarsndash bs-infliximabndash bs-etanercept

bull csDMARDsndash methotrexatendash sulphasalazinendash leflunomidendash cyclosporin A

bull Anti-IL17 pathwayndash ustekinumab (anti-IL23IL12)ndash guselkumab and tildrakizumabndash brodalumabndash secukinumabndash ixekizumab

bull tsDMARDsndash apremilastndash tofacitinib

bull Others bDMARDsndash abatacept

bull Investigational drugsndash many others

1 Gately MK et al Annu Rev Immunol 199816495-521 2 Wilson NJ et al Nat Immunol 20078(9)950-7 3 Nickoloff BJ Nestle FO J Clin Invest 2004113(12)1664-75 4 Nestle FO et al J Invest Dermatol 2004 123xiv-xxv

TNF-αIFN-γ

TNF-αIL-17IL-22

T cell

Differentiation and clonal expansionof Th1 and Th17

subsets is prevented

Antibody binds to the p40 subunit of IL-12 and

IL-23 preventing binding to their cell surface

receptors

Th1

Th17

Down-regulationof inflammatory

cytokines

Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab

USTEKINUMABSTELARA

La posologia Con o senza MTX dose iniziale di 45 mg somministrata per via sottocutanea seguita da una dose di 45 mg dopo 4 settimane e successivamente ogni 12 settimane In pazienti con un peso superiore a 100 kg la dose egrave di 90 mg

Interruzione del trattamento Non risposta al trattamento di 28 settimane

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 4: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)

EAM Prevalence () Uveitisiridocyclitis 30-40IBD 20-35Subclinical IBD 20-80Cutaneous involvement 70-80

Nail involvement 80

Crohn diseaseUveitis Psoriasis Psoriatic onychopathy

PsA ndash Comorbidities 1 CVDHypertension2 Obesity3 Diabetes4 DyslipidemiaHyperuricemia5 Metabolic Syndrome6 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

(NAFLD)7 Fibromyalgia8 Neurological manifestations9 AnxietyDepression

EAM and Comorbidities must be investigated and treated with

multidisciplinary approach

Patients with psoriatic arthritis are at

greater risk of death compared to the

general populationWong K et al Arthritis Rheum 1997401868ndash72

How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic population

The importance of Dermatologistto early Referral to

Rheumatologist

CASPAR Classification criteria for PsASensibilitagrave 098 specificitagrave 097

Taylor et sl Arthritis Rheum 2006 Aug54(8)2665-73

1 Inflammatory articular disease (joint spine enthesial) plus ge 1 of the following findings

Scorecurrent (2) history (1) or family history (1)

(1)

(1)

current or history of (1)

juxta-articular new bone formation other than osteophytes (1)

Tab CIassification criteria for Psoriasic ARthritis (CASPAR)5

Findings2 Psoriasis

3 Nail dystrophy

4 Negative rheumatoid factor

5 Dactylitis

6 Radiographic changes (hand and foot)

PSA = 1 + gt 3 scores of the categories 2-6

bullSensitivity 99 either at 1 or at 7 years of diseasebullTheir use in practice for the diagnosis of ePsA is not yet validated

EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA

The EARP questionnaire is simple and fast to administer and proved robust for the identification of PsA in the

dermatological setting Dermatologists should consider the EARP for patients

Treat-to-target in PsA

bull Targetndash the best possible disease clinical control in that patient (ideally

remission or at least minimal disease activity)ndash no anatomical damage

ndash good quality of life Comprehensive Disease Control

bull Definition of clinical remissionndash biological definition no inflammationndash surrogates of biological remission eg PASDAS lt32

bull Methods to achieve the target as early as possiblendash early diagnosis (window of opportunity)ndash tight controlndash proper treatment individualized therapy

DMARDs for PsA

bull TNF-α inhibitorsndash infliximabndash etanerceptndash adalimumabndash golimumabndash certolizumab pegol

bull Biosimilarsndash bs-infliximabndash bs-etanercept

bull csDMARDsndash methotrexatendash sulphasalazinendash leflunomidendash cyclosporin A

bull Anti-IL17 pathwayndash ustekinumab (anti-IL23IL12)ndash guselkumab and tildrakizumabndash brodalumabndash secukinumabndash ixekizumab

bull tsDMARDsndash apremilastndash tofacitinib

bull Others bDMARDsndash abatacept

bull Investigational drugsndash many others

1 Gately MK et al Annu Rev Immunol 199816495-521 2 Wilson NJ et al Nat Immunol 20078(9)950-7 3 Nickoloff BJ Nestle FO J Clin Invest 2004113(12)1664-75 4 Nestle FO et al J Invest Dermatol 2004 123xiv-xxv

TNF-αIFN-γ

TNF-αIL-17IL-22

T cell

Differentiation and clonal expansionof Th1 and Th17

subsets is prevented

Antibody binds to the p40 subunit of IL-12 and

IL-23 preventing binding to their cell surface

receptors

Th1

Th17

Down-regulationof inflammatory

cytokines

Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab

USTEKINUMABSTELARA

La posologia Con o senza MTX dose iniziale di 45 mg somministrata per via sottocutanea seguita da una dose di 45 mg dopo 4 settimane e successivamente ogni 12 settimane In pazienti con un peso superiore a 100 kg la dose egrave di 90 mg

Interruzione del trattamento Non risposta al trattamento di 28 settimane

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 5: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

PsA ndash Comorbidities 1 CVDHypertension2 Obesity3 Diabetes4 DyslipidemiaHyperuricemia5 Metabolic Syndrome6 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

(NAFLD)7 Fibromyalgia8 Neurological manifestations9 AnxietyDepression

EAM and Comorbidities must be investigated and treated with

multidisciplinary approach

Patients with psoriatic arthritis are at

greater risk of death compared to the

general populationWong K et al Arthritis Rheum 1997401868ndash72

How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic population

The importance of Dermatologistto early Referral to

Rheumatologist

CASPAR Classification criteria for PsASensibilitagrave 098 specificitagrave 097

Taylor et sl Arthritis Rheum 2006 Aug54(8)2665-73

1 Inflammatory articular disease (joint spine enthesial) plus ge 1 of the following findings

Scorecurrent (2) history (1) or family history (1)

(1)

(1)

current or history of (1)

juxta-articular new bone formation other than osteophytes (1)

Tab CIassification criteria for Psoriasic ARthritis (CASPAR)5

Findings2 Psoriasis

3 Nail dystrophy

4 Negative rheumatoid factor

5 Dactylitis

6 Radiographic changes (hand and foot)

PSA = 1 + gt 3 scores of the categories 2-6

bullSensitivity 99 either at 1 or at 7 years of diseasebullTheir use in practice for the diagnosis of ePsA is not yet validated

EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA

The EARP questionnaire is simple and fast to administer and proved robust for the identification of PsA in the

dermatological setting Dermatologists should consider the EARP for patients

Treat-to-target in PsA

bull Targetndash the best possible disease clinical control in that patient (ideally

remission or at least minimal disease activity)ndash no anatomical damage

ndash good quality of life Comprehensive Disease Control

bull Definition of clinical remissionndash biological definition no inflammationndash surrogates of biological remission eg PASDAS lt32

bull Methods to achieve the target as early as possiblendash early diagnosis (window of opportunity)ndash tight controlndash proper treatment individualized therapy

DMARDs for PsA

bull TNF-α inhibitorsndash infliximabndash etanerceptndash adalimumabndash golimumabndash certolizumab pegol

bull Biosimilarsndash bs-infliximabndash bs-etanercept

bull csDMARDsndash methotrexatendash sulphasalazinendash leflunomidendash cyclosporin A

bull Anti-IL17 pathwayndash ustekinumab (anti-IL23IL12)ndash guselkumab and tildrakizumabndash brodalumabndash secukinumabndash ixekizumab

bull tsDMARDsndash apremilastndash tofacitinib

bull Others bDMARDsndash abatacept

bull Investigational drugsndash many others

1 Gately MK et al Annu Rev Immunol 199816495-521 2 Wilson NJ et al Nat Immunol 20078(9)950-7 3 Nickoloff BJ Nestle FO J Clin Invest 2004113(12)1664-75 4 Nestle FO et al J Invest Dermatol 2004 123xiv-xxv

TNF-αIFN-γ

TNF-αIL-17IL-22

T cell

Differentiation and clonal expansionof Th1 and Th17

subsets is prevented

Antibody binds to the p40 subunit of IL-12 and

IL-23 preventing binding to their cell surface

receptors

Th1

Th17

Down-regulationof inflammatory

cytokines

Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab

USTEKINUMABSTELARA

La posologia Con o senza MTX dose iniziale di 45 mg somministrata per via sottocutanea seguita da una dose di 45 mg dopo 4 settimane e successivamente ogni 12 settimane In pazienti con un peso superiore a 100 kg la dose egrave di 90 mg

Interruzione del trattamento Non risposta al trattamento di 28 settimane

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 6: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic population

The importance of Dermatologistto early Referral to

Rheumatologist

CASPAR Classification criteria for PsASensibilitagrave 098 specificitagrave 097

Taylor et sl Arthritis Rheum 2006 Aug54(8)2665-73

1 Inflammatory articular disease (joint spine enthesial) plus ge 1 of the following findings

Scorecurrent (2) history (1) or family history (1)

(1)

(1)

current or history of (1)

juxta-articular new bone formation other than osteophytes (1)

Tab CIassification criteria for Psoriasic ARthritis (CASPAR)5

Findings2 Psoriasis

3 Nail dystrophy

4 Negative rheumatoid factor

5 Dactylitis

6 Radiographic changes (hand and foot)

PSA = 1 + gt 3 scores of the categories 2-6

bullSensitivity 99 either at 1 or at 7 years of diseasebullTheir use in practice for the diagnosis of ePsA is not yet validated

EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA

The EARP questionnaire is simple and fast to administer and proved robust for the identification of PsA in the

dermatological setting Dermatologists should consider the EARP for patients

Treat-to-target in PsA

bull Targetndash the best possible disease clinical control in that patient (ideally

remission or at least minimal disease activity)ndash no anatomical damage

ndash good quality of life Comprehensive Disease Control

bull Definition of clinical remissionndash biological definition no inflammationndash surrogates of biological remission eg PASDAS lt32

bull Methods to achieve the target as early as possiblendash early diagnosis (window of opportunity)ndash tight controlndash proper treatment individualized therapy

DMARDs for PsA

bull TNF-α inhibitorsndash infliximabndash etanerceptndash adalimumabndash golimumabndash certolizumab pegol

bull Biosimilarsndash bs-infliximabndash bs-etanercept

bull csDMARDsndash methotrexatendash sulphasalazinendash leflunomidendash cyclosporin A

bull Anti-IL17 pathwayndash ustekinumab (anti-IL23IL12)ndash guselkumab and tildrakizumabndash brodalumabndash secukinumabndash ixekizumab

bull tsDMARDsndash apremilastndash tofacitinib

bull Others bDMARDsndash abatacept

bull Investigational drugsndash many others

1 Gately MK et al Annu Rev Immunol 199816495-521 2 Wilson NJ et al Nat Immunol 20078(9)950-7 3 Nickoloff BJ Nestle FO J Clin Invest 2004113(12)1664-75 4 Nestle FO et al J Invest Dermatol 2004 123xiv-xxv

TNF-αIFN-γ

TNF-αIL-17IL-22

T cell

Differentiation and clonal expansionof Th1 and Th17

subsets is prevented

Antibody binds to the p40 subunit of IL-12 and

IL-23 preventing binding to their cell surface

receptors

Th1

Th17

Down-regulationof inflammatory

cytokines

Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab

USTEKINUMABSTELARA

La posologia Con o senza MTX dose iniziale di 45 mg somministrata per via sottocutanea seguita da una dose di 45 mg dopo 4 settimane e successivamente ogni 12 settimane In pazienti con un peso superiore a 100 kg la dose egrave di 90 mg

Interruzione del trattamento Non risposta al trattamento di 28 settimane

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 7: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

CASPAR Classification criteria for PsASensibilitagrave 098 specificitagrave 097

Taylor et sl Arthritis Rheum 2006 Aug54(8)2665-73

1 Inflammatory articular disease (joint spine enthesial) plus ge 1 of the following findings

Scorecurrent (2) history (1) or family history (1)

(1)

(1)

current or history of (1)

juxta-articular new bone formation other than osteophytes (1)

Tab CIassification criteria for Psoriasic ARthritis (CASPAR)5

Findings2 Psoriasis

3 Nail dystrophy

4 Negative rheumatoid factor

5 Dactylitis

6 Radiographic changes (hand and foot)

PSA = 1 + gt 3 scores of the categories 2-6

bullSensitivity 99 either at 1 or at 7 years of diseasebullTheir use in practice for the diagnosis of ePsA is not yet validated

EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA

The EARP questionnaire is simple and fast to administer and proved robust for the identification of PsA in the

dermatological setting Dermatologists should consider the EARP for patients

Treat-to-target in PsA

bull Targetndash the best possible disease clinical control in that patient (ideally

remission or at least minimal disease activity)ndash no anatomical damage

ndash good quality of life Comprehensive Disease Control

bull Definition of clinical remissionndash biological definition no inflammationndash surrogates of biological remission eg PASDAS lt32

bull Methods to achieve the target as early as possiblendash early diagnosis (window of opportunity)ndash tight controlndash proper treatment individualized therapy

DMARDs for PsA

bull TNF-α inhibitorsndash infliximabndash etanerceptndash adalimumabndash golimumabndash certolizumab pegol

bull Biosimilarsndash bs-infliximabndash bs-etanercept

bull csDMARDsndash methotrexatendash sulphasalazinendash leflunomidendash cyclosporin A

bull Anti-IL17 pathwayndash ustekinumab (anti-IL23IL12)ndash guselkumab and tildrakizumabndash brodalumabndash secukinumabndash ixekizumab

bull tsDMARDsndash apremilastndash tofacitinib

bull Others bDMARDsndash abatacept

bull Investigational drugsndash many others

1 Gately MK et al Annu Rev Immunol 199816495-521 2 Wilson NJ et al Nat Immunol 20078(9)950-7 3 Nickoloff BJ Nestle FO J Clin Invest 2004113(12)1664-75 4 Nestle FO et al J Invest Dermatol 2004 123xiv-xxv

TNF-αIFN-γ

TNF-αIL-17IL-22

T cell

Differentiation and clonal expansionof Th1 and Th17

subsets is prevented

Antibody binds to the p40 subunit of IL-12 and

IL-23 preventing binding to their cell surface

receptors

Th1

Th17

Down-regulationof inflammatory

cytokines

Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab

USTEKINUMABSTELARA

La posologia Con o senza MTX dose iniziale di 45 mg somministrata per via sottocutanea seguita da una dose di 45 mg dopo 4 settimane e successivamente ogni 12 settimane In pazienti con un peso superiore a 100 kg la dose egrave di 90 mg

Interruzione del trattamento Non risposta al trattamento di 28 settimane

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 8: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA

The EARP questionnaire is simple and fast to administer and proved robust for the identification of PsA in the

dermatological setting Dermatologists should consider the EARP for patients

Treat-to-target in PsA

bull Targetndash the best possible disease clinical control in that patient (ideally

remission or at least minimal disease activity)ndash no anatomical damage

ndash good quality of life Comprehensive Disease Control

bull Definition of clinical remissionndash biological definition no inflammationndash surrogates of biological remission eg PASDAS lt32

bull Methods to achieve the target as early as possiblendash early diagnosis (window of opportunity)ndash tight controlndash proper treatment individualized therapy

DMARDs for PsA

bull TNF-α inhibitorsndash infliximabndash etanerceptndash adalimumabndash golimumabndash certolizumab pegol

bull Biosimilarsndash bs-infliximabndash bs-etanercept

bull csDMARDsndash methotrexatendash sulphasalazinendash leflunomidendash cyclosporin A

bull Anti-IL17 pathwayndash ustekinumab (anti-IL23IL12)ndash guselkumab and tildrakizumabndash brodalumabndash secukinumabndash ixekizumab

bull tsDMARDsndash apremilastndash tofacitinib

bull Others bDMARDsndash abatacept

bull Investigational drugsndash many others

1 Gately MK et al Annu Rev Immunol 199816495-521 2 Wilson NJ et al Nat Immunol 20078(9)950-7 3 Nickoloff BJ Nestle FO J Clin Invest 2004113(12)1664-75 4 Nestle FO et al J Invest Dermatol 2004 123xiv-xxv

TNF-αIFN-γ

TNF-αIL-17IL-22

T cell

Differentiation and clonal expansionof Th1 and Th17

subsets is prevented

Antibody binds to the p40 subunit of IL-12 and

IL-23 preventing binding to their cell surface

receptors

Th1

Th17

Down-regulationof inflammatory

cytokines

Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab

USTEKINUMABSTELARA

La posologia Con o senza MTX dose iniziale di 45 mg somministrata per via sottocutanea seguita da una dose di 45 mg dopo 4 settimane e successivamente ogni 12 settimane In pazienti con un peso superiore a 100 kg la dose egrave di 90 mg

Interruzione del trattamento Non risposta al trattamento di 28 settimane

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 9: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Treat-to-target in PsA

bull Targetndash the best possible disease clinical control in that patient (ideally

remission or at least minimal disease activity)ndash no anatomical damage

ndash good quality of life Comprehensive Disease Control

bull Definition of clinical remissionndash biological definition no inflammationndash surrogates of biological remission eg PASDAS lt32

bull Methods to achieve the target as early as possiblendash early diagnosis (window of opportunity)ndash tight controlndash proper treatment individualized therapy

DMARDs for PsA

bull TNF-α inhibitorsndash infliximabndash etanerceptndash adalimumabndash golimumabndash certolizumab pegol

bull Biosimilarsndash bs-infliximabndash bs-etanercept

bull csDMARDsndash methotrexatendash sulphasalazinendash leflunomidendash cyclosporin A

bull Anti-IL17 pathwayndash ustekinumab (anti-IL23IL12)ndash guselkumab and tildrakizumabndash brodalumabndash secukinumabndash ixekizumab

bull tsDMARDsndash apremilastndash tofacitinib

bull Others bDMARDsndash abatacept

bull Investigational drugsndash many others

1 Gately MK et al Annu Rev Immunol 199816495-521 2 Wilson NJ et al Nat Immunol 20078(9)950-7 3 Nickoloff BJ Nestle FO J Clin Invest 2004113(12)1664-75 4 Nestle FO et al J Invest Dermatol 2004 123xiv-xxv

TNF-αIFN-γ

TNF-αIL-17IL-22

T cell

Differentiation and clonal expansionof Th1 and Th17

subsets is prevented

Antibody binds to the p40 subunit of IL-12 and

IL-23 preventing binding to their cell surface

receptors

Th1

Th17

Down-regulationof inflammatory

cytokines

Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab

USTEKINUMABSTELARA

La posologia Con o senza MTX dose iniziale di 45 mg somministrata per via sottocutanea seguita da una dose di 45 mg dopo 4 settimane e successivamente ogni 12 settimane In pazienti con un peso superiore a 100 kg la dose egrave di 90 mg

Interruzione del trattamento Non risposta al trattamento di 28 settimane

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 10: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

DMARDs for PsA

bull TNF-α inhibitorsndash infliximabndash etanerceptndash adalimumabndash golimumabndash certolizumab pegol

bull Biosimilarsndash bs-infliximabndash bs-etanercept

bull csDMARDsndash methotrexatendash sulphasalazinendash leflunomidendash cyclosporin A

bull Anti-IL17 pathwayndash ustekinumab (anti-IL23IL12)ndash guselkumab and tildrakizumabndash brodalumabndash secukinumabndash ixekizumab

bull tsDMARDsndash apremilastndash tofacitinib

bull Others bDMARDsndash abatacept

bull Investigational drugsndash many others

1 Gately MK et al Annu Rev Immunol 199816495-521 2 Wilson NJ et al Nat Immunol 20078(9)950-7 3 Nickoloff BJ Nestle FO J Clin Invest 2004113(12)1664-75 4 Nestle FO et al J Invest Dermatol 2004 123xiv-xxv

TNF-αIFN-γ

TNF-αIL-17IL-22

T cell

Differentiation and clonal expansionof Th1 and Th17

subsets is prevented

Antibody binds to the p40 subunit of IL-12 and

IL-23 preventing binding to their cell surface

receptors

Th1

Th17

Down-regulationof inflammatory

cytokines

Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab

USTEKINUMABSTELARA

La posologia Con o senza MTX dose iniziale di 45 mg somministrata per via sottocutanea seguita da una dose di 45 mg dopo 4 settimane e successivamente ogni 12 settimane In pazienti con un peso superiore a 100 kg la dose egrave di 90 mg

Interruzione del trattamento Non risposta al trattamento di 28 settimane

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 11: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

1 Gately MK et al Annu Rev Immunol 199816495-521 2 Wilson NJ et al Nat Immunol 20078(9)950-7 3 Nickoloff BJ Nestle FO J Clin Invest 2004113(12)1664-75 4 Nestle FO et al J Invest Dermatol 2004 123xiv-xxv

TNF-αIFN-γ

TNF-αIL-17IL-22

T cell

Differentiation and clonal expansionof Th1 and Th17

subsets is prevented

Antibody binds to the p40 subunit of IL-12 and

IL-23 preventing binding to their cell surface

receptors

Th1

Th17

Down-regulationof inflammatory

cytokines

Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab

USTEKINUMABSTELARA

La posologia Con o senza MTX dose iniziale di 45 mg somministrata per via sottocutanea seguita da una dose di 45 mg dopo 4 settimane e successivamente ogni 12 settimane In pazienti con un peso superiore a 100 kg la dose egrave di 90 mg

Interruzione del trattamento Non risposta al trattamento di 28 settimane

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 12: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

USTEKINUMABSTELARA

La posologia Con o senza MTX dose iniziale di 45 mg somministrata per via sottocutanea seguita da una dose di 45 mg dopo 4 settimane e successivamente ogni 12 settimane In pazienti con un peso superiore a 100 kg la dose egrave di 90 mg

Interruzione del trattamento Non risposta al trattamento di 28 settimane

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 13: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

438

554

356

202

286

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

tutti no anti-TNF anti-TNF

UstekinumabPlacebo

Week 24

Combined UST dose 45-90 mg Placebo 104UST 45 103UST 90 105

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

ACR20 response

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 14: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

Ustekinumab
Placebo
Colonna1
438
202
554
286
356
19

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
tutti tutti tutti
no anti-TNF no anti-TNF no anti-TNF
anti-TNF anti-TNF anti-TNF
Page 15: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Foglio1

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Ustekinumab Placebo Colonna1
tutti 438 202
no anti-TNF 554 286
anti-TNF 356 19
Per ridimensionare lintervallo di dati del grafico trascinare langolo inferiore destro dellintervallo
Page 16: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

ResultsAlla settimana 24 la risposta egrave stata raggiunta indipendentemente dal concomitante uso di MTX

dagger per i pazienti qualificati allrsquoearly escape i dati alla settimana 16 sono stati portati avanti fino alla settimana 24 successivamente sono stati utilizzati i dati osservati

Ritchlin et al PSUMMIT2 ARD 2014

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Page 17: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II

Patients who did not receive UST are excluded

Mea

n C

hang

e fr

om B

asel

ine

Radiographic progression

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Page 18: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

Placebo (n=310)
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269)
UST 45 mg (n=308)
UST 90 mg (n=309)
0
0
0
097
097
04
039
115
058
065

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 0 Week 0 Week 0 Week 0
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Page 19: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Week 0 Week 24 Week 52
Placebo (n=310) 0 097
Placeborarr45 mg at Wk 24 (n=269) 097 115
UST 45 mg (n=308) 0 04 058
UST 90 mg (n=309) 0 039 065
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Page 20: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Dactylitis responseMedian percent change from baseline

0

-1000 -1000

(n=90)(n=84)

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

0

-1000-950

(n=44)(n=24)

-40

-80

-100

-20

-60

Med

ian

chan

ge (

)

(n=86)

-909-1000

(n=38)

PSUMMIT 11 ndash Week 100 PSUMMIT 22 ndash Week 52

1 Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015 doi 101002acr22645 [Epub ahead of print] 2 Ritchlin CT et al Ann Rheum Dis 201473990ndash9 supplementary appendix

Placeborarrustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mgUstekinumab 45 mg

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Page 21: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

PSUMMIT I - III

18

n=118

n=119 n=130 n=249

Kavanaugh A et al Arthritis Care amp Research 2015 67 1739ndash1749

PSUMMIT 1

Enthesitis responseMedian Percent Change from Baseline in Entheses Score

Ritchlin C et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014 73 990ndash999

PSUMMIT 2

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Page 22: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Chart1

PBO rarr UST 45 mg
UST 45 mg
UST 90 mg
UST Combined
Median Change
-389
-4627
-5817
-5248

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Week 100 Week 100 Week 100 Week 100
Page 23: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
PBO rarr UST 45 mg UST 45 mg UST 90 mg UST Combined
Week 100 -389 -4627 -5817 -5248
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Page 24: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

PBO (n=68)
UST 45 mg (n=70)
UST 90 mg (n=70)
PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Median Percent Change
-333
0
-3333
-4833
-3667
-60
0

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Week 52 Week 52 Week 52 Week 52
Page 25: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
PBO (n=68) UST 45 mg (n=70) UST 90 mg (n=70) PBO--gtUST 45 mg (n=24)
Week 24 00 -333 -483
Week 52 -367 -600
Page 26: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Patients who discontinued for efficacy reasons or who initiated protocol prohibited medications were included in all analyses as non-responders Patients with missing Wk 12 data were considered Wk 12 non-responder Patients randomized to UST 45mg or 90mg at Wk0 are included beginning at Wk0 Patients randomized to Placebo at Wk0 and crossed-over to UST at Wk 12 are included beginning at Wk 24

Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s (

)

45 mg n =

90 mg n =

Week568566

517515

508507

504503

494485

548542

538538

533531

524522

550551

512507

555558

538534

527524

499499

553552

580577

409411

591

594409411

589

587

584

585

Clinical Response Through Week 244 Overall Population

789

714

459

551 555

765

786

500

Kimball AB et al J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 271535

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
Page 27: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606)
PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606)
PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606)
PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0
0
0
0
17
24
02
05
17
196
49
56
56
639
294
342
667
757
423
509
677
779
43
511
748
835
505
603
73
807
475
571
695
786
44
534
711
812
461
557
714
789
459
551
692
786
433
535
683
771
418
522
707
764
434
516
745
782
451
526
768
803
487
548
779
803
454
545
768
801
461
541
779
798
493
544
789
819
507
561
802
82
517
561
779
80
511
561
779
795
516
56
797
805
528
546
788
801
528
561
772
78
507
543
765
786
50
555

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
40 40 40 40
52 52 52 52
64 64 64 64
76 76 76 76
88 88 88 88
100 100 100 100
112 112 112 112
128 128 128 128
140 140 140 140
152 152 152 152
164 164 164 164
176 176 176 176
188 188 188 188
200 200 200 200
212 212 212 212
224 224 224 224
236 236 236 236
244 244 244 244
Page 28: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
PASI 75 UST 45 mg (n = 606) PASI 75 UST 90 mg (n = 606) PASI 90 UST 45 mg (n=606) PASI 90 UST 90 mg (n=606)
0 0 0 0 0
2 17 24 02 05
4 17 196 49 56
8 56 639 294 342
12 667 757 423 509
16 677 779 43 511
20 748 835 505 603
24 73 807 475 571
28 695 786 44 534
40 711 812 461 557
52 714 789 459 551
64 692 786 433 535
76 683 771 418 522
88 707 764 434 516
100 745 782 451 526
112 768 803 487 548
128 779 803 454 545
140 768 801 461 541
152 779 798 493 544
164 789 819 507 561
176 802 82 517 561
188 779 80 511 561
200 779 795 516 56
212 797 805 528 546
224 788 801 528 561
236 772 78 507 543
244 765 786 50 555
Page 29: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score

NAPSI

Miglioramento delle caratteristiche piugrave comuni della psoriasi delle unghie (pitting onicolisi e ipercheratosi) alla settimana 52

P Rich et alBritish Journal of Dermatology 2014 Feb170(2)398-407

Phoenix I

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
Page 30: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population

(PSOLAR)

21Kalb R et al G2C 2014 P1643

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

UST(N=49)

IFX(N=56)

ETA(N=55)

ADA(N=102)

MTXNon-

biologic(N=16)

Non-MTXNon-

biologic(N=40)

All(N=323)

249 147 197083 128 105 145

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
Page 31: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

Series 1
083
249
147
197
128
105
145

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
UST
IFX
ETAN
ADA
MTX Non-biologics
Non-MTX Non-biologics
Total
Page 32: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Series 1
UST 083
IFX 249
ETAN 147
ADA 197
MTX Non-biologics 128
Non-MTX Non-biologics 105
Total 145
Page 33: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)

Fiorentino D et al AAD 2015 P1631

Cum

ulat

ive

Rat

es p

er 1

00 P

Y (9

5 C

I)

Ustekinumab(6012472 PY)

Infliximab(415176 PY)

Other Biologics

(11615991 PY)

Non-biologic

(576749 PY)

All(27440388 PY)

081 073 075 068051

Cumulative rates of malignancies

This group Includes (n=36) patients exposed to golimumab only957 (n=4067) are adalimumab ampor etanercept patients with the remainder exposed to other biologicsAdjustment used all population as reference

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Page 34: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

Series 1
051
081
073
075
068

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Ustekinumab
InfliximabGolimumab
Other biologics
No biologic
All
Page 35: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Series 1
Ustekinumab 051
InfliximabGolimumab 081
Other biologics 073
No biologic 075
All 068
To resize chart data range drag lower right corner of range
Page 36: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

When to use USTEKINUMABbull in early phase of PsA to reduce radiological

progressionbull in dactilytisenthesitis subsetsbull High NAPSI levelbull in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications

or adverse event)bull complianceadherence to therapy (every 12

weeks)

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Page 37: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Secukinumab

IL-17A

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

and cellular immunity

Tissue inflammation and pathogen

defense

Tissue inflammation

IFN-γIL-2

IL-17FIL-21IL-22

IL-17A

Selective inhibition of IL-17A may preserve normal components of the host immune response

Neutralization of IL-17A rapidly inhibits downstream inflammatory

cytokine and chemokine networks and thus may be useful for the treatment of

several immune-mediated diseases

IL-17A neutralized by Secukinumab

IL-12

Th17

Mast cells

Other leukocytes

Th1

IL-23

TNF

Dendritic cells

Secukinumab binds with high affinity and selectivity to human IL 17A

Secukinumab

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Page 38: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

secukinumab(Cosenty)

la dose con o senza MTXEgrave di 150 mg per iniezione sottocutanea con dosaggio iniziale alle settimane 0 1 2 e 3 seguito da un dosaggio di mantenimento mensile a partire dalla settimana 4 Per i pazienti con AP e con concomitante psoriasi a placche da moderata a severa o che non hanno risposto in modo adeguato alla terapia con anti-TNFalfa la dose raccomandata del secukinumab egrave 300 mg

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Page 39: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

60

ACR20

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2

80

ACR20

60

40

0

Res

pond

er (

)

20

ACR50 ACR70

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

Dagger

DaggerDaggerDaggerDagger

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

Anti-TNF naiumlve

Anti‒TNF non-responnder

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Page 40: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 75
placebo
455
273
152
297
189
108
147
59
59
143
86
455
297
147
143
273
189
59
86
152
108
59
0

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
ACR20 ACR20 ACR20 ACR20
ACR50 ACR50 ACR50 ACR50
ACR70 ACR70 ACR70 ACR70
Page 41: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300 secu 150 secu 75 placebo
ACR20 455 297 147 143
ACR50 273 189 59 86
ACR70 152 108 59 0
Page 42: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

secu 300
secu 150
secu 752
placebo
582
388
224
635
444
270
369
246
62
159
63
16

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
Page 43: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
secu 300 secu 150 secu 752 placebo
582 635 369 159
388 444 246 63
224 27 62 16
secu 300
582
388
224
Page 44: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)

n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65 n = 63 n = 67 n = 63 n = 65

n = 33 n = 37 n = 34 n = 35 n = 34 n = 35 n = 33 n = 37 n = 34

van der Heijde d et al AampR 2016 Mar 25doi 101002art39685 [Epub ahead of print]

Radiographic progressionIn the overall population radiographic progression was inhibited through 52 weeks efficacy was demonstrated for both erosion and joint space narrowing scores and in patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 24 Subgroup analyses showed secukinumab reduced progression at week 24 regardless of prior anti-TNF use helliphellipA high proportion of patients showed no progression (le05) with secukinumab from baseline to week 24 (IVrarr150 mg 823 IVrarr75 mg 923) and from week 24 to week 52 (IVrarr150 mg 857 IVrarr75 mg 858)

Secukinumb IV rarr 150 mg (n = 202) Secukinumab pooled doses (n = 404)

Secukinumb IV rarr 75 mg (n = 202) Placebo (n = 202)

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
Page 45: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

Dagger
150 mg
75 mg2
pooled
placebo
013
002
008
057
004
008
006
035
01
-006
002
023

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
mTSS mTSS mTSS mTSS
Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score Erosion score
Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score Joint spacing narrowing score
Page 46: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
150 mg 75 mg2 pooled placebo
mTSS 013 002 008 057 Table 142-81 (Page 1 of 3)
Erosion score 004 008 006 035 Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 24 using non-parametric ANCOVA Linear extrapolation Table 142-83 (Page 1 of 3)
Joint spacing narrowing score 01 -006 002 023 Full analysis set Joint structural damage change from baseline at Week 52 using non-parametric ANCOVA Evaluable cases
Full analysis set
Erosion score
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Erosion score
Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treatment Group n Median Mean Comparison Estimate SE p-value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 182 000 008 vs Placebo -028 014 00430
AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 185 000 004 vs Placebo -034 013 00091 AIN457 10 mgkg - 75 mg (N = 202) 175 000 016 vs Placebo -020 016 02011
AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 367 000 006 vs Placebo -031 013 00152 AIN457 10 mgkg - 150 mg (N = 202) 179 000 022 vs Placebo -015 016 03296
Placebo (N = 202) 179 000 035 AIN457 Pooled (N = 404) 354 000 019 vs Placebo -019 014 01817
Placebo (N = 202) 157 000 034
Page 47: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0

100

Sogg

etti

()

80

60

0Week 24 Week 24

40

20

40

20

Dactylitis resolution Enthesitis resolution

sectsect sect

Dagger

Secukinumab 300 mg sc Secukinumab 75 mg sc PlaceboSecukinumab 150 mg sc

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Page 48: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg
Placebo
565
500
303
148
565
50
303
148

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Page 49: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Secukinumab 10mgkg - 300mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 150mg Secukinumab 10mgkg - 75mg Placebo
Week 24 565 50 303 148
Page 50: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

Secukinumab 300mg
Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 75 mg
Placebo
482
422
324
215
482
422
324
215

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Week 24 Week 24 Week 24 Week 24
Page 51: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 300mg Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 75 mg Placebo
Week 24 482 422 324 215
Page 52: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

29

IGA 01 response

Week

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s With

Res

pons

e

PASI 90 response

Week

PASI 100 response

PASI 75 response

Placebo (n=324a)Secukinumab 150 mg (n=327a)Secukinumaab 300 mg (n=323a) Etanercept (n=323a)

867 755

724

368

Langley R et al 22nd EADV Congress Istanbul Turchia 2ndash6 ottobre 2013

Secukinumab in psoriasis(FIXTURE)

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Page 53: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
128
245
46
06
361
508
158
06
511
625
272
28
612
755
393
63
746
43
618
755
461
609
74
464
59
728
452
55
715
433
56
693
43
535
681
433
511
678
421
514
678
372

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Page 54: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 09 03 0
18 34 03 09
58 105 15 06
4 128 245 46 06
8 361 508 158 06
12 511 625 272 28
535 632 276
59 693 334
584 728 356
16 612 755 393
20 63 746 43
24 618 755 461
28 609 74 464
32 59 728 452
36 55 715 433
40 56 693 43
44 535 681 433
48 511 678 421
52 514 678 372
Page 55: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
46
118
15
0
26
378
87
12
419
542
207
15
538
724
313
578
703
337
572
709
378
557
728
396
535
718
415
508
697
378
517
672
396
52
653
381
48
663
368
45
65
334

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Page 56: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
03 0 03 0
06 06 06 0
18 37 03 0
4 46 118 15 0
8 26 378 87 12
12 419 542 207 15
456 579 211
508 616 254
505 659 291
16 538 724 313
20 578 703 337
24 572 709 378
28 557 728 396
32 535 718 415
36 508 697 378
40 517 672 396
44 52 653 381
48 48 663 368
52 45 65 334
Page 57: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
15
34
0
0
86
142
15
06
144
241
43
0
257
368
74
242
344
102
248
399
111
235
399
121
239
406
13
235
384
127
242
39
118
248
368
111
245
362
124
199
362
99

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Page 58: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 03 0
06 09 0 0
4 15 34 0 0
8 86 142 15 06
12 144 241 43 0
19 285 5
214 307 68
251 341 77
16 257 368 74
20 242 344 102
24 248 399 111
28 235 399 121
32 239 406 13
36 235 384 127
40 242 39 118
44 248 368 111
48 245 362 124
52 199 362 99
Page 59: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Grafico1

Secukinumab 150 mg
Secukinumab 300 mg
Etanercept
Placebo
0
0
0
0
214
341
68
19
56
678
269
31
67
771
44
49
755
867
585
786
87
601
774
864
613
758
848
641
734
839
613
691
83
628
688
82
616
697
824
616
664
817
61
657
786
554

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 4 4 4
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
24 24 24 24
28 28 28 28
32 32 32 32
36 36 36 36
40 40 40 40
44 44 44 44
48 48 48 48
52 52 52 52
Page 60: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Sheet1

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Secukinumab 150 mg Secukinumab 300 mg Etanercept Placebo
0 0 0 0 0
06 06 06 0
34 34 12 03
8 164 37 09
4 214 341 68 19
8 56 678 269 31
12 67 771 44 49
676 78 483
737 82 517
734 827 557
16 755 867 585
20 786 87 601
24 774 864 613
28 758 848 641
32 734 839 613
36 691 83 628
40 688 82 616
44 697 824 616
48 664 817 61
52 657 786 554
Page 61: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Secukinumab in PsAFUTURE 2

McInnes IB et al Lancet 2015 386 1137

Safety

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 62: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

When to use secukinumab

in early phase of PsA (first line) toreduce radiological progression

in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs

controindications or adverse event)

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 63: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production

by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 64: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Tabella 1 Schema di titolazione della dose Giorno 1 Giorno 2 Giorno 3 Giorno 4 Giorno 5 Giorno 6 e successivi

mattina mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio mattina

pomeriggio

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

30 mg

30 mg

30 mg

La dose raccomandata di Otezla egrave 30 mg due volte al giorno assunta per via orale alla mattina e alla sera a distanza di circa 12 ore senza limitazioni per quanto riguarda lrsquoassunzione di cibo Con onsenza altri cDMARDsEgrave previsto uno schema di titolazione iniziale come riportato nella Tabella 1 di seguito Dopo la titolazione inizialenon egrave richiesta una nuova titolazione

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 65: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4

Study Placebo ()

Apremilast 20 mg BID ()

P Value

Apremilast 30 mg BID () P Value

PALACE 1 190 304 00166 381 00001

PALACE 2 189 374 00002 321 00060

PALACE 3 183 284 00295 407 lt00001

PALACE 4 159 280 00062 307 00010

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020Kavanaugh A et al EULAR 2014 [oral presentation] Edwards CJ et al EULAR 2014 [poster SAT0389]

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 66: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1

Kavanaugh A et al Ann Rheum Dis 2014731020

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 67: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Apremilast in PsAPALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score

Gladman D et al ACR 2013 [oral presentation]

Dactylitis count

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 68: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Apremilast in psoriasisESTEEM 1-2

Papp K et al JAAD 2015 73(1)37Paul C et al Br J Dermatol 20151731355

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 69: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3

Edwards CJ et al Ann Rheum Dis 2015doi101136

Safety

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 70: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

When to use apremilast

First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 71: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 72: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Coates et al Arthritis Rheum 2016 Jan 8 doi 101002art39573 [Epub ahead of i t]

GRAPPA Guidelines

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 73: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Drugs for PsA in clinical development

Target Pso PsA CD AS RA

IL-12p40IL-23p40

Ustekinumab Appr Appr Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Briakinumab Ph3 Ph2 (stop)

IL-12p19

Tildrakizumab Ph3 Ph1

Guselkumab Ph3 Ph2 Ph2

BI-655066 Ph2 Ph2 Ph2

AMG 139 Ph1 Ph2

IL-17A IL-17RA

Secukinumab Appr Appr Ph2 (stop) Appr Ph3

Ixekizumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph3 Ph2

Brodalumab Ph3 Ph3 Ph2 (stop) Ph2 (stop)

Co-stimulationinhibition Abatacept Ph3 Appr

IL-17 and TNF-α ABT-122 Ph2 Ph2

PDE4 Apremilast Ph3 Appr Ph3

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 74: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

bull New drugs will allow a more targeted therapy

bull Still a long way to true individualized therapy

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 75: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE

MAURO GALEAZZI

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 76: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

PsA peripheral manifestations

bull Synovitis

bull Enthesitis

bull Dactylitis

bull Tenosynovitis

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 77: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Bone lesions in PsAOsteolysis

Pencil in cup Mutilans Tuft resorption

New bone formationJuxta-articular periostitis Shaft periostitis Ankylosis

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 78: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

The axial manifestations of PsA

Phenotypes- Ankylosing spondylitis-like- Psoriatic phenotype

Psoriatic phenotypeasymmetrical sacroiliitistype II syndesmophytesless severe evolutiongrade 2-3 sacroiliitisvariable spine involvementdownward progression

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 79: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestationsPsoriasis

Uveitis

IBD

Other extra-articular manifestationsndash conjunctivitis and othersndash cardio-vascular diseasendash metabolic syndromendash heart disease ndash neurological diseasendash liver disease

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 80: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Lubrano E et al Drugs 2016 76663

Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 81: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF-α inhibitors

bull Slightly less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull More effective on dactylitis

bull More effective on enthesitis

bull Equally effective on peripheral erosive damage (more effective on proliferative damage)

bull Ustekinumab seems to have a better safety profile

bull More effective on psoriasis (especially secukimumab)

bull Equally expensive (comparison with bio-anti-TNF)

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs
Page 82: ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA … · ARTRITE PSORIASICA: STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHE TRA PRESENTE E FUTURO Mauro Galeazzi Università di Siena

Apremilast vs bDMARDs

bull Less effective on synovitis

bull Effective in anti-TNF failure (but less than in bio-naiumlve)

bull Less effective on dactylitis

bull Less effective on enthesitis

bull No data on radiographic progression

bull Good safety profile

bull Less effective on psoriasis

bull Cost

  • ARTRITE PSORIASICA STRATEGIE TERAPEUTICHETRA PRESENTE E FUTUROMauro GaleazziUniversitagrave di Siena
  • Le Spondiloartriti
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Definition
  • PsA extrarticular manifestations (EAM)
  • PsA ndash Comorbidities
  • How to identify ePsA in the psoriatic populationThe importance of Dermatologist to early Referral to Rheumatologist
  • Diapositiva numero 7
  • EARP questionnaire to detect early PsA
  • Treat-to-target in PsA
  • DMARDs for PsA
  • Proposed mechanism of action for ustekinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 13
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Results
  • Ustekinumab in PsAPSUMMIT-II
  • Dactylitis response
  • Diapositiva numero 18
  • Ustekinumab in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis PHOENIX 1 study (5 years)
  • Improvement in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score
  • Cumulative incidence rates of serious infections per 100 patient-years overall population(PSOLAR)
  • Age and gender adjusted cumulative rates of malignancies (excluding NMSC) per 100 patient-years (PY)
  • When to use USTEKINUMAB
  • Secukinumab
  • Diapositiva numero 25
  • Secukinumab in PsA ACR responseFUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in PsA (FUTURE 1)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • Secukinumab in psoriasis (FIXTURE)
  • Secukinumab in PsA FUTURE 2
  • When to use secukinumab in early phase of PsA (first line) to reduce radiological progression in severe psoriasis (first line) in dactilytisenthesitis subsets in monotherapy (DMARDs controindications or adverse event)
  • Apremilast (Otezla) blocca lazione fosfodiesterasi 4 (PDE4) limits cytokine production by human T cells (Th1 Th2 and Th17 )in vitro
  • Diapositiva numero 33
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1 2 3 and 4
  • Apremilast in PsA ACR20 at week 16PALACE 1
  • Apremilast in PsA PALACE 1‒3 Pooled (week24)
  • Apremilast in psoriasis ESTEEM 1-2
  • Apremilast in psoriasisPALACE 3
  • When to use apremilast First oral tDMARD High level of safety After cDMARDs inefficacy cDMARDS toxicity Dactylitisenthesitis
  • Taking SpA features into account for treatment decisions in PsA EULAR 2015 updated recommendations
  • Diapositiva numero 41
  • Drugs for PsA in clinical development
  • Diapositiva numero 43
  • GRAZIE PER LrsquoATTENZIONE
  • PsA peripheral manifestations
  • Bone lesions in PsA
  • The axial manifestations of PsA
  • Psoriatic disease non-articular manifestations
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of tDMARDs in RCTs
  • IL-2312 and Il-17 inhibitors vs TNF- inhibitors
  • Apremilast vs bDMARDs