arizona systems

14
Julia Coffman [email protected] Evaluating Systems Building

Upload: cassandra-oneill

Post on 30-Oct-2014

215 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

System Change Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Arizona systems

Julia [email protected]

Evaluating Systems Building

Page 2: Arizona systems

Early Learning

Health, Mental

Health and Nutrition

Family Support

Special Needs/ Early Intervention

Source: Early Childhood Systems Working Group

Early Childhood Development System

Page 3: Arizona systems

What is systems building?

2.

3.

Three Questions

What are the implications for evaluation?

What are elements of system building?

Page 4: Arizona systems

System Building Sequence

System Building Activities

Better Child and Family Outcomes

Better Early

ChildhoodSystem

Page 5: Arizona systems

1) Context

Policies Funding

Page 6: Arizona systems

2) Components

Family Support Early Intervention

Health, Mental Health, NutritionPreK

Page 7: Arizona systems

3) Connections

Early Learning

Health, Mental

Health and Nutrition

Family Support

Special Needs/ Early

Intervention

Source: Early Childhood Systems Working Group

Page 8: Arizona systems

4) Infrastructure

• Governance• Training• Quality• Data

Page 9: Arizona systems

5) Scale

• Spread• Breadth• Depth• Ownership

Page 10: Arizona systems

Scale

Infrastructure

Connections

Components

ContextImproving the political context that surrounds the system so it produces the policy and funding changes needed to create and sustain it

Establishing high-performance programs and services that produce results for children and families

Creating strong linkages across system components that further improve results for children and families

Developing the supports systems need to function effectively and with quality

Ensuring a comprehensive system is available to as many people as possible

Five Elements of Systems Building

Page 11: Arizona systems

ScaleInfrastructureConnectionsComponentsContext

• Shared vision

• Leadership

• Public engagement

• Media coverage

• Public will

• Political will

• Policy changes

• New system programs or services

• Expanded program reach or coverage

• Improved quality

• Increased operational efficiency

• Shared goals

• Shared standards

• Shared competencies or skills standards

• Seamless services

• Cross-system governance

• State-local connections

• Shared data systems

• Cross-system training and professional development

• System spread

• System depth

• System sustainability

• Shifts in system ownership

Expected System-Level Outcomes

Page 12: Arizona systems

Initiatives typically are not expected to demonstrate how context-related outcomes causally connect to child- or family-level impacts

Initiatives typically are not expected to demonstrate how infrastructure outcomes causally connect to child- or family-level impacts

Better impacts for children and families related to specific programs or practices

Better impacts for children and families where or when connections are made compared to when they are not

Better impacts for beneficiaries across a broad spectrum of domains and on a system-wide population level (e.g., on community or state indicators)

ScaleInfrastructureConnectionsComponentsContext

Expected System-Level Impacts

Page 13: Arizona systems

ScaleInfrastructureConnectionsComponentsContext

• Theory of change evaluation

• Case studies

• Public polling

• Policy tracking

• Key informant surveys

• Coalition analysis

• Policymaker interviews

• Media tracking

• Program evaluation methodologies (including experimental/ quasi)

• Program monitoring

• Quality assessments

• Efficiency analyses

• Customer surveys

• Program evaluation methodologies (including experimental/ quasi)

• System mapping

• Network analysis

• Customer surveys

• Theory of change evaluation

• Case studies

• Performance audits

• Management information systems

• Practitioner data collection

• Population-based demographic and service analysis

• Program evaluation methodologies (including experimental/ quasi)

• System/program monitoring

• Results-based accountability

Methods

Page 14: Arizona systems

Once the relevant areas have been defined, use the framework to help define which expected outcomes and impacts are relevant and realistic.

Finally, use the framework to define suitable evaluation approaches to capture those outcomes and impacts. Evaluation approaches can be “mixed and matched” across the relevant areas as appropriate.

Systems initiatives are different. It is important to define what the initiative is doing so that expectations about results are realistic. The framework can be a guide. Use it to identify which of the five focus areas are relevant.

Framework Uses