arcs review november 2011 hoga agm patricia smith donna fedorkow bev pindar-donick and many others
TRANSCRIPT
ARCS ReviewNovember 2011
HOGA AGM
Patricia SmithDonna Fedorkow
Bev Pindar-Donickand many others
Objectives
• Review current Academic Role Listing to:–Determine appropriateness of item inclusion• Addition• Deletion
– Establish “relativity” of items• Equitable points allocation for different roles
– (Identify areas to increase HOGA $$)
Too Big a Bite to Chew
ARCS: Biggest Issues
• Cumbersome–Bean counting
• Lack of “relativity”–“Same” role has different value– Some role “over valued”
Adopt the K.I.S.S. Principle
Premis:As AFP Members there are certain expectations
• Teach on a day to day basis• Involve learners in deliveries• Welcome learners into the
operating room– L&D - C/Sections– Gyne OR
• Teach while on call • Supervise on the wards
Calculations:
• Generalists (St. Joes & MUMC)– PGY 1&2 resident months x 20 ÷ # generalists
with fudge factors for time away– On call allocation – “don’t you remember, I
covered you from 8 ‘till 10 that day”• Subspecialists– # resident months x 20 ÷ # subspecialists with the
subspecialty divvying up the pot– On call allocation – same as above
3-year Average CalculationsDiscipline Average Recommended value
SGH Generalist 613 600
MUMC Generalist 587 600
MFM 340 400
Colpo 347 400
Gyne Onc 440 400
Urogyne 333 400
REI 333 400
Ultrasound 100 100
Sexual Medicine 150 150
PND 49 49
Per member of group: allocation as per group consensus
Teaching Sessions
• What is done during any rotation: practice orals, OSCEs, teaching sessions, chat over coffee etc., is a part of the rotation and covered in the predetermined points
• Additional teaching sessions are at the discretion and scheduling of the undergraduate and postgraduate program
Proposal #1:
• Generalist receive 600 points per site per year• Subspecialists receive 400 points per year• Ultrasound stays at 100 points per year• Sexual Medicine stays at 150 points per year• PND stays at 49 points per year
• To be divided PRN
Lectures/Simulations/EvaluationsLecture Old New Recommendation
Academic half day 5 5
CMAS 1 (per hour) 5 (per half day)
OSATS ? 5 (per half day)
PG OSCE 1 (per hour) 5 (per session)
MF3 2 5
Clerkship 1.5 5
LMCC Review Course 10 5
UG OSCE (5.5 hours) 3 5
McMaster CME Presentation
5 5
Does not account for length of session
Proposal #2:
• Academic Half Day• MF3• Clerkship• LMCC Review etc.– All 5 points per session
Does not account for length of lecture
EducationUndergraduate Site Coordinator
• Minimum of 2 students per rotation • 10 points per year
Proposal # 2:That the above definition and points allocation be adopted
Research
Role Old Points New Recommendation
Journal reviewer 3 2
External Grant Reviewer 5 3
Abstract review (per abstract) 5 0.25
Proposal #3:Adopt new values for above roles
Research
Activity Old Points New Recommendation
Presentation Oral/Poster-First presentation-Subsequent presentations
1010 5
Invited: National, International 10
Invited: Local, Regional 5
Proposal #4:Adopt new values for above roles
Research GrantsType Old Points New Recommendation
Major Competitive – TriCouncil(CIHR, NSERC, SSHRC) & NIH - Principle Investigator - Co-Applicant
5020
100
Other Competitive – eg. Heart & Stroke, Cancer Care Ontario, ECHO, Canadian Diabetes Association, CFWH - Principle Investigator - Co-Applicant
3010
50
Non Competitive/Industry Funded - Principle Investigator - Co-Applicant
15 5
Proposal #5:Adopt new values for above roles
MD Stipended RolesFrom MD Supplemental $$
Old New Recommendation
Tutor MF 1-5 points Stipend to individual
Pro Comp Facilitator points Stipend to individual
Proposal #6:Adopt new values for above roles
Committee Membership• Ex Officio membership based on a stipended
role (eg. undergraduate coordinator) is NOT eligible for additional ARCS $.
• Committees eligible for ARCS $ must be educational or research based:
Department Provincial
FHS National
University International
Proposal #7:Adopt the above principles
Accountability
• Star CV allows for input of university activities at source
• Mistakes happen so it is up to the individual to check for accuracy
• Corroboration is needed for claims made from outside the university eg: presentations, abstract reviews, grant reviews, committee membership, publications etc.
• Random audits will take place
Ccccccccccccc cccccccccc
Making the Pie Bigger
FHS Program• UG Clerkship – student
headcount• UG MD Supplemental –
leadership roles• PG – resident headcount
AFP• Headcount – HOGA
members• Repair – Alms from Internal
Medicine• Academic Contributions –
AFP identified roles
Make the ARCS Pie Bigger
Pie Enhancers
• Student Advisor• MD Admissions• MD OSCE• Tutor MF• Facilitator PC• MF3 Clinical skills
Further Work• Research Grants• Multiple Presentations of same work• MD program roles and participation• Postgrad roles and participation• Mentorship: Undergrad & Postgrad• Encourage roles that make the pie bigger
Proposal # 8: should we continue?
Proposal # 9
Anyone wanna take over?