archetypal characters in beautiful boxer and white …

13
e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157 Terakreditasi Sinta 4 145 ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE CHICKS FILMS Briananda Stefanus, Surya Sili, Nasrullah Department of English Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Mulawarman University E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The concern of this study was about the archetypal characters of men characters who transformed into women as portrayed by Toom of Beautiful Boxer and Kevin & Marcus of White Chicks films. This study used Jung’s four major archetypes to find out the types of archetype portrayed by the three men characters and their similarities and differences toward each other. Qualitative research was the research design of this study. The data used in this study were words (narrations and dialogues) related to Toom character taken from the English Subtitle of Beautiful Boxer film and Kevin & Marcus characters of White Chicks film script. This study found the archetypes portrayed by Toom of Beautiful Boxer film were persona, shadow, and anima. Meanwhile, the archetypes of persona and anima were portrayed by Kevin and Marcus of White Chicks film. The similarity of archetype portrayed by Toom, Kevin, and Marcus was that their anima archetype existing from another archetype which led to the difference among the three of them. Toom’s anima was the result of his growing shadow containing his oppressed desire of becoming a real woman, while Kevin and Marcus’ anima came from their persona archetype related to their mission of pretending as women. Based on these findings, this study concluded that shadow archetype affected Toom’s decision of transforming into woman, while persona affected Kevin and Marcus’. Keywords: archetypal criticism, archetypes, archetypal characters ABSTRAK Fokus penelitian ini berpusat pada perwujudan karakter arketip laki-laki yang bertransformasi menjadi perempuan seperti yang terdapat pada karakter Toom difilm Beautiful Boxer dan karakter Kevin & Marcus difilm White Chicks. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori empat arketip utama milik Jung untuk menemukan tipe-tipe arketip yang ditunjukkan oleh ketiga karakter laki-laki tersebut beserta persamaan dan perbedaannya antara satu dengan yang lain. Penelitian kualitatif merupakan bentuk dari penelitian ini. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini merupakan kata- kata dalam bentuk narasi dan dialog yang berhubungan dengan karakter Toom dari

Upload: others

Post on 02-Oct-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

145

ARCHETYPALCHARACTERSINBEAUTIFULBOXERANDWHITECHICKSFILMS

BrianandaStefanus,SuryaSili,NasrullahDepartmentofEnglishLiterature,FacultyofCulturalSciences,

MulawarmanUniversityE-mail:[email protected]

ABSTRACT

Theconcernof thisstudywasaboutthearchetypalcharactersofmencharacterswhotransformedintowomenasportrayedbyToomofBeautifulBoxerandKevin&MarcusofWhiteChicksfilms.ThisstudyusedJung’sfourmajorarchetypestofindout the types of archetype portrayed by the three men characters and theirsimilarities and differences toward each other. Qualitative research was theresearchdesignofthisstudy.Thedatausedinthisstudywerewords(narrationsand dialogues) related to Toom character taken from the English Subtitle ofBeautifulBoxerfilmandKevin&MarcuscharactersofWhiteChicksfilmscript.ThisstudyfoundthearchetypesportrayedbyToomofBeautifulBoxerfilmwerepersona,shadow, and anima. Meanwhile, the archetypes of persona and anima wereportrayedbyKevin andMarcusofWhiteChicks film.The similarityof archetypeportrayedbyToom,Kevin,andMarcuswasthattheiranimaarchetypeexistingfromanother archetypewhich led to the difference among the three of them. Toom’sanimawas the result of his growing shadow containing his oppressed desire ofbecomingarealwoman,whileKevinandMarcus’animacamefromtheirpersonaarchetyperelatedtotheirmissionofpretendingaswomen.Basedonthesefindings,this study concluded that shadow archetype affected Toom’s decision oftransformingintowoman,whilepersonaaffectedKevinandMarcus’.

Keywords:archetypalcriticism,archetypes,archetypalcharacters

ABSTRAK

Fokus penelitian ini berpusat pada perwujudan karakter arketip laki-laki yangbertransformasi menjadi perempuan seperti yang terdapat pada karakter ToomdifilmBeautifulBoxerdankarakterKevin&MarcusdifilmWhiteChicks.Penelitianinimenggunakan teori empat arketip utama milik Jung untuk menemukan tipe-tipearketipyangditunjukkanolehketigakarakterlaki-lakitersebutbesertapersamaandan perbedaannya antara satu dengan yang lain. Penelitian kualitatifmerupakanbentukdaripenelitianini.Datayangdigunakandalampenelitianinimerupakankata-katadalambentuknarasidandialogyangberhubungandengankarakterToomdari

Page 2: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

146

teks terjemahan film Beautiful Boxer dalam Bahasa Inggris dan karakter Kevin &Marcusdari skrip filmWhiteChicks.Penelitian inimenemukanbahwa tipearketipyang ditunjukkan oleh karakter Toom difilm Beautiful Boxer merupakan arketippersona,shadow,dananima.Disisilain,arketippersonadananimaditunjukkanolehkarakterKevin danMarcus difilmWhite Chicks. Persamaan karakter arketip yangditunjukkan oleh karakter Toom, Kevin, dan Marcus terletak pada arketip animamerekayangmunculdariarketiptipe lainyangpadaakhirnya jugamemunculkanperbedaanterhadapanimamerekamasing-masing.AnimamilikToommunculdariarketipshadowmiliknyayangterus-terusantumbuhdenganmenampungkeinginanterlaranguntukmenjadiseorangperempuansejati,sedangkananimamilikKevindanMarcusdatangdariarketippersonamerekayangberhubungandenganmisiberpura-pura menjadi perempuan. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwashadowmerupakantipearketipyangpalingmempengaruhikeputusanToomdalambertransformasimenjadiseorangperempuan,sedangkanpersonamerupakanarketipyangpalingmempengaruhikeputusanKevindanMarcusdalammenjalankanmisinyaberpura-puramenjadiperempuan. Katakunci:kritikarketip,arketip,karakterarketipA.INTRODUCTION

Whenweenjoyworkslikefilmornovel,theremustappearvarietyoffeelingsthatwefeelfromtheworkitself.Thefeelingscanbesad,enraged,touched,joy,etc.that are often times accompanying its reader or spectator as the side effect ofenjoyingthoseworks.Yet,thereisonefeelingthatmaybefamiliartohappenandperhapswesometimesjustbrushitoff.Thatisthefeelingofexperiencing‘certainor typical’ situation from ‘certain or typical’ character. This phenomenon inliteratureiscommontohappenandcalledasarchetypes(JunginDaniels5).Jungstates that as human being, we perceive certain patterns in life (experiences,behaviour,etc.) fromourancestorsandarestored inourunconscious(1).Thesepatternthenwillbecomeaspartofourexistencetoshowouridentityfromacertainrace, culture, religion, etc. The concern of this studywas about the archetypalcharactersofthreemencharacterswhotransformedintowomen:ToomofBeautifulBoxer and Kevin & Marcus of White Chicks films. The researcher used Jung’sarchetypalcriticismtoanalyse the typesofarchetypeportrayedbyToom,Kevin,andMarcusandtheirsimilaritiesanddifferencestowardseachother’s. B.THEORETICALFRAMEWORK

1.ARCHETYPALCRITICISM

In our universe, especially within the stories over the world, there is acommon-repetitivepatternappearastheformofcollectiveunconsciousnessthatarestoredinhumanmindscalledarchetype(JunginDaniels5).Thearchetypesexist

Page 3: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

147

ineveryhumanmindastherootofeverything.Understandingthearchetypesmaybe a bit confusing, because according to Jung himself, archetypes is almosteverythingthatposeastherootoftheuniverse(5).Thismeansthatevenallhumanin thisworldare thearchetypalsofAdamas the firsthumanbeing (5). In short,anything that comes from the collective unconscious as the result of the root’sanothercopyisthearchetype.Jungmentionstherearefourmajorarchetypesthatcanbefoundinacharacterofthestory:persona,shadow,anima,andanimus.

a. Personaisthearchetypethatworksastheoutermaskofpeopleinlivingtheirlifeinsociety(JunginAdamski566).Thismeansthatwithintheself,we-people,actuallyhavetwodifferentsides:theselfthatwelettheworldperceivesandtheself thatwekeeponly forourselves.Theonethatwelet theworldsees isourpersona. Persona associates with the society systems like job, education,marriage,etc.

b. Shadow is the archetype working to contain human’s dark sides. People’soppresseddesirelikesex,lifeinstincts,andusuallythenegativethoughts,actionsareconsideredastheshadow(JunginBoeree6).Onemayrefusetoacknowledgehis/herdesireduetothesociety’smoral.

c. Animaisthearchetypetoshowthefeaturesofwomanwithinaman(JunginBoeree7).RememberingJungonceclaimsthatactuallyhumanbeingarebisexual(7) that our sex identification are based on biological characteristics ofmale-female and followed by the society’s moral that either one is masculine orfeminine. Seeing the notion of bisexual itself somehow makes sense for theexistenceofanima/animusinone’sself.Theanima’sfeaturesassociatewiththetraits of femininity (Jung inAdamski 565). Those traits can be in the formofmotherhood,caring,empathy,etc.

d.Animus isthearchetypetoshowthefeaturesofmanwithinawoman(JunginBoeree7).Eventhoughthatwomenarecommonlyknownwiththeirfemininetraits like sensitive, caring, tolerance, emotional, but they are also capable ofdeveloping themasculine traits. Becoming assertive, having careerwithin theintellectual field (Jung in Adamski 566), that are dominated by men are theinstancesofmasculinitywithinthewoman.

2.PREVIOUSSTUDIES

ThefirstpreviousstudywasentitledTheApplicationofJungianArchetypestotheAnalysisofCharacter in threeEarlyPlaysbyW.B.YeatsbyBenjaminE.Fleer.Fleer’s studydiscussedabout theexistenceof Jung’sarchetypeswithin the threeplaysofW.B.Yeats.TheplaysthathadbeenidentifiedintoJungianarchetypeswereTheCountessCathleen,TheLandofHeart’sDesire,andTheHour-Glass.AstheresultofFleer’sstudy,therewereseveralarchetypesfoundineachofW.B.Yeats’playthathadtheirownrolesininfluencingthethreeplays.Thosearchetypesweremaiden,mother,anima,andtricksterinTheCountessCathleenplay;maiden,wiseoldman,child,andtricksterintheplayofTheLandofHeart’sDesire;andinthelastplayasthearchetypesofwiseoldman.

Page 4: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

148

ThesecondpreviousstudywasentitledAnalysisofArchetypalCharacterJimCasyinTheGrapesofWrathbyYanhongFan.Fan’sstudyfocusedonthearchetypalcharacterofJesusChristportrayedbyJimCasyinSteinback’snovelTheGrapesofWrath.FanusedthenotionofarchetypalcharactersbyNorthropFryetofindoutthearchetypalcharactersofJesusChristinJimCasyandtheacrhetypalimagesfromtheBibleinTheGrapesofWrathnovel.TheresultofthisstudyshowedJimCasywasindeedthearchetypalcharacterofJesusChristbasedonthefollowingfindings:(1)hisinitialsJ.C.couldbeseenasJesusChrist;(2)hisjourneyinfindingthewilderness;(3)hisannouncementofthenewreligion;(4)hisdisciplineofTomJoadtowardshim;(5)hesubstitutedTomJoadinprison;(6)andhispersecutionanddeathasamartyrdom for the people he hold dear.While, the archetypal images fromTheGrapesofWrathasitappearedinBibleweretheimagesoflight-darkness,thewateraboveandbelow,thedrylandsfromwater,andgrapes.

The third previous study was entitled Gender Performativity in EkachaiUekrongtham’s Beautiful Boxer written by Cindy Lacitra Dialek. Dialek’s studydiscussedabouttheissueofgenderperformanceofthemaincharacterinBeautifulBoxer film,Toom in theeyesof JudithButler’s genderperformativity.This studyusedqualitativeresearchasitsmethod.TheresultofherstudyshowedthatToom’sgenderwasfluid:heperformedtwodifferentgendersinsideandoutsidethering(Toomwasakickboxer).Asamanwhenhewas insidetheringandasawomanoutsidethering.

ThefourthpreviousstudywasentitledTheAnalysisofComplimentExpressionintheFilmEntitledWhiteChicks(ASocio-PragmaticsStudy)writtenbySaptoKuncoro.Kuncoro’sstudyfocusedtodescribethetypesofcompliment,thefunctionsofeachcomplimentemployedbythecharacters,andthecomplimentresponsesexpressedby the addresses inWhite Chicks film. This study was a descriptive qualitativeresearch and used socio-pragmatics as its approach. In answering the threeobjectives of his study, Kuncoro used Wolfson’s theory about classification ofcompliment functions. The result of his study showed that (1) the types ofcomplimentexpressionusedbythecharactersinWhiteChicksfilmwerepersonalappearance,possession,generalability,andspecific-actability;(2)thefunctionsofeachcomplimentusedweretoaffirmsolidarity,tocreateormaintainrapport,toexpress admiration or approval, to encourage, to express positive evaluation, tostrengthenortoreplaceotherspeechactformulas;and(3)thewaymostaddresseesinWhiteChicksfilmrespondedtothecomplimentswasbyemployingappreciationtoken,verballyandnon-verballyacceptance.C.RESEARCHMETHOD

Inqualitativeresearch,thefocusisoninterpretingthemeaningofhumanlifefromtextualdata(YoungandHren2).Qualitativetendstofindflexibletruthsfrommanyperspectivesinsteadofnumbersinitsinterpretationofdata.Aswellasinthisstudy,theresearcherdiscussedabouttheexistenceofarchetypesthatfollowingtoJungasthecollectiveunconsciousstoredinthehuman’smind(qtd.inDaniels5).

Page 5: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

149

Theinstrumentusedinthisstudyastheonewhoconductedalltheprocessinvolvedsuchdevelopingtheresearchquestions,collectingdata,interpretingandanalysingthe data, answering the research questions, and taking conclusions was theresearcherhimself.Thisstudyusedtextualdataorwordsintheformsofnarrationsanddialoguestakenfromafilmscriptandsubtitle.TheresearcherusedWhiteChicksfilmscriptasthesourceofKevinandMarcus’data.WhilethedataaboutNongToom,aleadingcharacterfromBeautifulBoxer filmweretakenfromthefilmsubtitleinEnglish.

Thereweretwostepstobedoneincollectingthedataneededinthisstudyby(1)watchingBeautifulBoxerandWhiteChicksfilmstopayextraattentiontowardsToom, Kevin, and Marcus characters; (2) taking notes of the narrations anddialogues to group which data described the four major archetypes (persona,shadow,anima,andanimus)portrayedbythethreecharacters.Inthefirstquestion,this study focused on finding out the types of archetype portrayed by ToomcharacterofBeautifulBoxerandKevin&MarcuscharactersofWhiteChicks films.The researcheranalysed thedataofToom,Kevin, andMarcusbasedon the fourmajorarchetypesofCarlJung.Theresultshowedthetypesofarchetypeportrayedbythethreemaincharacters.Thesecondquestionwasabout thesimilaritesanddifferencesof archetypes among the threemain characters.Here, the researcherexplainedthesimilaritiesanddifferencesofToom,Kevin,andMarcus’archetypestowardeachother’s. D.FINDINGSANDDISCUSSION

1.Toom,Kevin,andMarcus’ArchetypesandTheirSimilarities&Differences

ThearchetypesportrayedbyToomcharacterofBeautifulBoxerwerepersona,shadow, and anima, while for Kevin & Marcus characters ofWhite Chicks werepersonaandanima. a. Persona

When Toom decided to become a kickboxer, this decision actuallycontradictedwithhisfemininetraits.Hewasafraidofpainandhatedtohurtothers(whichwasoneofhisreasonsofdesiringtobecomeawoman).Toom’sreasonofchoosingkickboxingtoaffordhislivingwasbecausehewantedtoprovideabetterlifeforhisfamily,especiallyhismum.

Data2(PSN,min.1:03:45)Toom :ThecrowdloveitwhenIdidthat.Especiallythereporters.

But,theydon’tknowthatIkisstosayI’msorry.Idon’tliketohurtstrangers.Butinthering,youhavenochoice.

Hisstatementaboveshowedclearlythatbecomingakickboxerwasnotsomethingthathewishedtodo.Ifhecould,hewantedtobeabletodothingsthatgaveharmtonoone.Yet,allheknewwaskickboxingandheneededtoaffordhisownlifeandfamilywhichlefthimnootheroption.Thus,inordertoovercomehiscontradictedfeelingswithhisprofessionasakickboxersothathewascapableofdoinghiswork

Page 6: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

150

properly,Toomusedhispersona.Hispersonahelpedhimtoappearasatoughmanwhowasreadytobeatanyoneintheringeventhoughdeepinside,Toommightfeelsad.

InKevin’scase,heusedhispersonaforthesakeofhisjobtotransformhimselfasoneoftheWilsonheiresses,BrittanyWilsoninordertoprotectherfrombeingkidnapped. Here, Kevin changed his appearance and adjusted the attitude to beexactlylikeBrittanyWilson.Thematterofappearancemightnotbeaproblem,butanattitudeofaWilsonasspoiledandwhiningatthatmightbeadifferentcaseforhim.

Data8(PSN,min.50:51) FBIAgents :Hotelsecurity!Iseverythingalrighthere?Kevin as Brittany : Everything is fine. Just a little case of PMS.

That’s all. I’m just one big, emotional wreck.CouldyouguysgoandgetmesomeMidolandSnickers?

OnenightwhenKevinandMarcuswereintheirundercoverastheWilsons,thereweretwosuspiciousguysshowingattheirhotelroomaskingforBrittanyWilson.Suspectingthatthesetwoguyscouldbethekidnappers,Kevinattackedthetwoofthemwithhismartialskills.Thisaccidentobviouslycreatedchaostothepointofmakingeveryoneeventhehotelsecuritiescametolookupwhathadhappenedinthe room. The truthwas the two guyswere not the kidnappers. Theywere thestrippers that Tori asked to entertain their slumber party by acting to kidnapBrittany(inthiscasewasKevin)aspartoftheirshow.

AswellasinKevin’scase,Marcusalsousedhispersonaforthesakeofhisjobin pretending as Tiffany Wilson. He needed to appear and act exactly like her,includingthetemper.Inordertoachieveallthis,heusedhispersona.Hispersonahelped him to make other people related to theWilsons perceived him as her.Therefore,whenMarcus,inasplitofsecondlosthistemperandalmostrevealedhisidentityasaman,hispersonahelpedhimtogetthesituationundercontrol.

Data13(PSN,min.51:54)MarcusasTiffany :Hey, yo! You do that again, I’m going to

bust...I’llbustoutintears. Tori :Inbreds!Karen :You’reajerk!

AfterKevinandMarcuswereabletoactastheWilsons,theywereinvitedbythegirlfriendstohavefuninthenearestbeach.There,hewasbulliedbytheWilsons’rivalsand ruined the girls’ fun. Remembered that Marcus was pretending to be theWilson’sgirlwhowaswell-knownasthewhiningqueenwhichmeantthatheshould,obviously,actedlikeoneafterbeingbullied.Yet,helosthistemperandshoutedtotheWilson’srivalsinstead.Foramoment,everyonewhowitnessedthatglimpseofharshattitudewasshocked.Seeingtheshockineveryone’seyes,Marcusrealisedthathelethispersonadownforabitandasquicklyaspossibleputhispersonaback

Page 7: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

151

byswitchingtheharshwordthathewasgoingtosayintothewhining-typeoftheWilsons’.

ThepersonaarchetypeportrayedbyToom,Kevin,andMarcusshoweditsownfunctionsineachcharacter’slife.InToom’slife,thepersonaarchetypehelpedhimtoappearastheidealmaninhisenvironment.InKevin’slife,thepersonaarchetypehelpedhimtoperformhisworkwellinpretendinghimselfasawomanandtoformarelationshipwithhisdreamwoman.InMarcus’ life,heusedhispersonaontheworkmattersonly.

The similarityofpersonaarchetypeportrayedby the threemencharacterslaidonthefactthattheirpersonaworkedtorelatethemwiththeoutsideworldinthematterofwork.InToom’scase,hewasportrayedasakickboxerwhoshouldactlikeonedespitethefactthathehatedviolentacts.Heusedhispersonatocoverhishatredtowardsviolenceinordertodohisworkwell.InKevinandMarcus’cases,theyweretheFBIagentswhoperformedundercoveredmissionsinwhichrequiringthemtobeabletochangeidentities.Theymusthaveotherpeopletoperceivethemaccording towhat identity theywere playing at themoment. This kind ofworkdemandedahugeroleofpersonasothattheycouldblendwiththechosenidentity.

ThedifferencesofpersonaarchetypeonlyappearedbetweenToomandKevincharacters.InthematterofMarcus,heusedhispersonaonlyontheworkmatterwhichexcludedhimwhenitcametothedifferencesofpersonaarchetype.Besidesusingpersonaforthesakeofhisworkasakickboxer,Toomalsousedittoassociatewithotherpeople.Hewasbornasamanwhichrequiredhimtoactasone(betough,masculine, etc.) inhis environment.This fact contradictedwithToom’sdesireofbecoming a woman which made him to use his persona in order to meet theexpectationsofhisenvironmentaboutbeingaman.Ontheotherhand,Kevinalsousedhispersonatoassociatewithanotherpeople.ThedifferencewasjustinKevin’scase,heattemptedtomeettheexpectationsofhisloveabouttheidealman,whileinToom’s case, he attempted to meet the expectations of being a man in hisenvironment.Astheconclusions,personaarchetypeworkedtohelpToom,Kevin,and Marcus lived their life in the society’s system even though some of it (thesystems)mightdefytheirdesiresorconditionsatthemoment. b. Shadow

ShadowarchetypeonlyportrayedbyToomcharacterofBeautifulBoxerfilm.ForKevinandMarcusofWhiteChicksfilmdidnotportrayanyshadowduetothefactthattheydidnotposeanyoppresseddesire.EventoKevin’scase(whenheusedhis persona to become Latrell Spencer so that he could approach his belovedwoman)didnotmeanthatbecomingsomeoneelsewasaformofoppresseddesire.ItwasbecausehisactofpretendingasLatrellSpencerdidnotharmanyone,neitherhimselfnorDenisePorterasthewomanthathewishedtoimpressto.EvenafterDenisefoundoutthetruththatKevinwasnotLatrellSpencer,thatfactdidnotcauseanyharmtoher.Therefore,bothKevinandMarcusdidnotportrayanyshadowinWhiteChicksfilm.

Page 8: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

152

Toomhadalreadyshownhisdesire tobecomeawomansincehewasveryyoung.Thisdesirestartedafterhewenttothenightmarketinhishometownandsawtwodifferentshows:astagewheretherewasagroupofwomendancingandaring of two men kickboxing. Little Toom was terrified after seeing the ring ofkickboxingandthoughtheneverwantedtobecomeamanforallheperceivedthatmanwasdestinedtobewithviolenceandhehatedthat.Ontheotherhand,LittleToomwas fascinatedby thebeautifulappearanceof thosedancingwomen, theirsmoothandgracefulmoveshad trappedLittleToom. Starting then,hisdesireofbecomingawomanhadturnedintohisshadowduetothefactthatitwasforbiddeninhisenvironment.Especially,whenhewassenttobecomeamonkbackthen.

Data3(SDW,min.17:42)LittleToom :Iwanttohavesoftskin,beautifulnails,longhair...Toom’sfriend :Andbreaststoo,Ibet. LittleToom :Exactly.Toom’sfriend : You can’t be thinking of theseweird things all the

time.Ifyoudo,yourparentswillsuffer.

WhenToomwasinhistrainingtobeamonk,hewasorderedtofollowthemonk’srules,oneofwasnottoputanymakeupon.Thisfactgavehimahardtimeandhetoldhisfriendabouthistruedesire:tobecomeawoman.Toomwantedtohavethewomen’sfeaturesespeciallyontheappearancesinspiteofthefactthathewasbornasaman.ThisdesireofhimhadbecomehisshadowbecauseToomhadtosuppressitduetotworeasons:(1)becomingamonkforbadehimtoactand/orappearlikeawomanand(2)thebeliefsthatifToomstillrefusedtoobeytherules,hisparentswouldsufferasthekarmaofhissinfordesiringtobecomeawoman.

TheformofToom’sshadowwasthathedesiredtobeawomanonedaywhichwent against his born gender as aman. That desire of himwas included as theshadowarchetypeforitwasanoppressedone(Toomhiditwhileactingoutasaman and a kickboxer) and brought suffering to the people around him. Yet, thisshadowarchetypethatposedamassiveroleforinfluencingToom’stransformationintoarealwoman.Thisshadowthathelpedhimtomaintainhistrueidentitywhileheactedout as amanandakickboxer throughhispersona. If itwasnot forhisshadow,Toommightlosehisownidentitywhenusinghispersonaduetoitscharmofperceiving(personaarchetypeperceivedotherpeopleandtheonewhouseditaswellwhich confused that person about his/her true identity: onemightmistakehis/hertrueidentityastheonehe/sheshowedittotheouterworld).

c.Anima

As it had been shown in the shadow archetype, Toom always wanted tobecomeawoman.Thissolefactwasenoughtoawakethefemininetraitswithinhim.Toomnaturallyactedandappearedjustlikeawoman.

Data5(AMA,min.49:34)Toom’sMum:You’resowhiny,howcanyoubecomeaman?Toom :IneversaidIwantedtobecomeaman.

Page 9: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

153

EvenhisownmumadmittedthatToomposedthefemininetraits.Theconversationbetweenhimandhismumaboveshoweditclearlywhenhismummentionedoneofthe feminine traits that Toom was portraying, whining. Toom responded byadmittingthathewasawhinerandthereforehisidentityasamanwasnotsuitableforhim.Toomconsciouslyportrayedthefemininetraitandwantedtobeapprovedof having it. Thus, itwas a compliment forToom if therewas otherpeoplewhopointedoutthatfemininetraitofhim.

Kevinwascapableofshowingthefemininetraitofcaring.HeshowedthistraitasoneoftheWilsons’girlfriends,Karenhadherfeelingsdisappointedbyaman.

Data11(AMA,min.1:16:45)Karen :Ipaidthousandsofdollarsonthisoutfitand

doyouthinkheevennoticed?KevinasBrittany :It’sgoingtobeokay.

Afteraparty,Karenwasdrunkandstartedtoblurtoutnon-sensesoftheattitudehercrushhadgiventhathegavenolooktowardsherappearancedespitethefactthatshehadgivensomucheffortintoit.SeeingKarenwassobroken-hearted,Kevincalmedherdownbyshowinghisaffectionandthesisterhood-kind-of-supporttoher.Kevin’sactofcalmingdownKarenactually includedasfemininetrait forusually,womenaretheoneswhodothat.Womenarewidelyknowntohavestrongbondofsisterhoodwhenthingsgowrongespeciallywithloveissues.Therefore,whenKevinshowedhisaffectionandthesisterhood’ssupport,thisfactclearlyshowedthatheposedtheanimaarchetype.

Marcuswasalsoableinportrayingthefemininetraitofcaring.Thistraithadbeen portrayed by him unconsciously as he attempted to give advise towardsKaren’sloveissue.

Data16(AMA,min.47:59)Karen :Okay,youguys.Whatdoesitmeanwhena

guy is really in a bad relationship and it’sreally, really obvious that he wants to bewithyoubuthejustcan’tseemtobreakupwithhisgirlfriend?

KevinasBrittany : It means you’re a totalbootycall. MarcusasTiffany :Ah!OhmyGod!Brittany! KevinasBrittany :Well,youwerethinkingit. MarcusasTiffany :Well, you said it.You know, sometimes

yousoundjustlikeaman. KevinasBrittany :SoI’vebeentold.MarcusasTiffany :Whatshemeanstosayhoney,ismaybe

you’rejustmakingyourselfjustalittlebittoo,like,available.

WhenKarenaskedfortheiropinionaboutthesituationshewasexperiencingatthemoment,KevinandMarcustoldheraboutthebittertruth.TellingthatKarenwas

Page 10: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

154

justaplaythingforthemanthatshehadfallento.Yet,whenKevinusedrudetermsdirectedatKaren,Marcusquicklyrephrasedit.HeintentionallychosepolitetermsinordertoexplainthemeaningofKevin’swords.Marcus’actofrephrasingKevin’swordsintothepoliteonesshowedthathewasportrayingthefemininetraitinhimas caring. He avoided to hurt Karen’s feeling evenmorewhen he knew that hisexplanationmightstillhurtherfeelinganyway.

Furthermore,Marcus’actofcaringalsoshowedbyhimtellingthetruththatthemanKaren lovedwasnotagoodman.Thathewas justplayingaroundwithKarenbecauseheknewthatshewouldalwaysbethereforhim.EvenknowingthattellingthistruthwouldhurtKaren’s feeling,hechosetotell itanywayduetohiscaringfeelingtowardsKaren.HedidnotwantKarentofallforthewrongman.ThiswasthefemininetraitinsideMarcus.

Theanimaarchetypeportrayedbythethreemencharactersaboveshoweditsownform.InToom’scase,heportrayedtheconsciousanimaregardingtohisowndesiretobecomearealwomanwhichwasnaturallyemittedoutfromhim.InKevinand Marcus’ case, they portrayed the unconscious anima because they wereimposedtoportrayit.Theirtransformationaswomenwasnotsomethingthattheydesired to happen, unlike in Toom’s case. Kevin and Marcus had to pretend aswomeninordertoprotecttheWilsonsfromthekidnappingplot.

The similarity appeared was on the fact that the anima archetypes wereportrayed bymen characters (Toom, Kevin, andMarcus) who transformed intowomen.ToomcharacterofBeautifulBoxerfilmwasa(man)kickboxer,whileKevinandMarcusofWhiteChicksfilmwere(men)theFBIagents.ThedifferencesofanimaarchetypeportrayedbyToom,Kevin,andMarcuslaidonthesetwofacts:thereasonofeachcharacterportrayedanimaarchetypeandthesourceofarchetypethatledthemtoportrayanima.ThereasonofToomportrayedhisanimawasbecausehewantedtobecomearealwomanandthus,hisanimaarchetypewasincludedastheconsciousone.ThereasonofKevinandMarcusportrayedtheiranimawasforthesakeoftheirFBI’smissionwhichrequiredthemtopretendastheWilsons.Thisfactledtheiranimaarchetypeastheunconsciousform.

Toom’sanimawastheresultofhismassiveshadowwhichdesiringawoman’sappearanceandsoulinhim.Simplyput,shadowarchetypewasthesourcearchetypethat causing Toom to have feminine traits as his (somehow) natural effort ofbecomingarealwoman.KevinandMarcus’animaweretheresultoftheirpersonain order to have other people perceived them as theWilsons. Even though thecharacteristicofanimaasthefemininetraitsinmen(whichimpliedthatKevinandMarcus even without having the undercovered mission might still posed theiranima),yet if itwasnot for theirpersonastruggling toemit thosetraits,noneofthemwerecapableofportraying.Toconclude,animaarchetypeindeedexistedinamanregardlessthematterifonejustlikeToomcharacterdesiredtobearealwomannoras itwasportrayedbyKevinandMarcus’casewheretheypretendedtobeawoman.

Page 11: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

155

2.Discussion

ThisstudyfoundoutToomcharacterofBeautifulBoxerfilmportrayedthreetypesofarchetypewhichwerepersona,shadow,andanima.Heusedhispersonatoactasamanandakickboxerfollowingtothesysteminhisenvironment.Toom’sshadow contained his dark desire of becoming a realwoman since hewas veryyoung.Toom’sanimawas theresultofhisstrongshadowwhichaffectinghimtotransform into a real woman. Meanwhile, Kevin character ofWhite Chicks filmportrayed two types of archetype which were persona and anima. He used hispersonaforthesakeofhisundercoveredmissionasBrittanyWilsonandtobecomean ideal man for Denise Porter. Kevin’s anima was the result of his personapretendingasawoman,BrittanyWilson.MarcuscharacterofWhiteChicksfilmalsoportrayed two archetypes which were persona and anima. His persona wasintendedonlyforthesakeofhisworkastheFBIagent.Hisanimawasalsoastheresult of his persona (pretending as awoman, TiffanyWilson)which led to theconclusionthatpersonawasthearchetypethataffectinghisdecisionofpretendingasawoman.

Theresultofthisstudyshowedsomesimilaritiesanddifferenceswiththefourpreviousstudies.ThefirstpreviousstudywasentitledTheApplicationof JungianArchetypestotheAnalysisofCharacterinthreeEarlyPlaysbyW.B.YeatsbyFleerdiscussedabouttheexistenceofJung’sarchetypesW.B.Yeats’plays:TheCountessCathleen,TheLandofHeart’sDesire,andTheHour-Glass.TheresultofFleer’sstudyshowed thatmaiden,mother, anima, trickster,wise oldman, and childwere thearchetypesexisting inYeats’ threeplays.ThesimilaritybetweenFleer’swith thecurrentstudywastheexistenceofanimaarchetypeastheresultineachstudy.Thedifferencesbetweenthetwowere:(1)Fleer’sstudyusedJung’sminorarchetype,while the current study used the major ones and (2) Fleer’s study focused onanalysingthearchetypesinYeats’threeplays(TheCountessCathleen,TheLandofHeart’sDesire,andTheHour-Glass),whilethecurrentstudyconcernedonfindingout thearchetypesportrayedbyToomofBeautifulBoxer andKevin&MarcusofWhiteChicksfilms.

ThesecondpreviousstudywasentitledAnalysisofArchetypalCharacterJimCasy inTheGrapesofWrath byFan focusedon thearchetypal characterof JesusChristportrayedbyJimCasyinSteinback’snovelTheGrapesofWrath.TheresultofFan’sstudyshowedJimCasyasthearchetypalcharacterofJesusChristbasedonhisinitials,hisjourneyinfindingthewilderness,hisannouncementofthenewreligion,hisdisciplineofTomJoad,hissubstitutionofTomJoadinprison,andhispersecutionanddeathasamartyrdomforthepeopleheholddear.ThesimilaritybetweenFan’sstudywiththecurrentstudyshowedinthematterthatbothstudiesfocusedtheiranalysis on the archetypal characters. The differenceswere: (1) Fan used Frye’snotionofarchetypalcharacter,whilethecurrentstudyusedJungianarchetypesand(2) Fan concerned on finding out Jesus Christ’s representations on Jim Casycharacter,whilethecurrentstudyfocusedonfindingoutthearchetypesportrayedbymencharacterswhotransformedintowomen.

Page 12: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

156

The third previous study was entitled Gender Performativity in EkachaiUekrongtham’sBeautifulBoxerbyDialekdiscussedabout genderperformanceofToomcharacterinBeautifulBoxerfilm.Dialek’sstudyshowedthatToom’sgenderwasfluid:asamaninsidetheringandasawomanoutsidethering.ThesimilaritybetweenDialek’sandthecurrentstudywasonthefactthatbothstudiesfocuseditsanalysisonToomcharacterofBeautifulBoxer.Thedifferencewas Dialek’sstudydiscussed about Toom’s gender performance, while the current study discussedaboutthearchetypesthatToomhadportrayedinBeautifulBoxerfilm.

ThefourthpreviousstudywasentitledTheAnalysisofComplimentExpressionintheFilmEntitledWhiteChicks(ASocio-PragmaticsStudy)byKuncoroconcernedontheanalysisoflinguisticsaspectsinWhiteChicks film.Theresultsofhisstudyshowed that (1) complimentexpressionused inWhiteChicks filmwerepersonalappearance,possession,generalability,andspecific-actability;(2)functionsofeachcomplimentusedweretoaffirmsolidarity,tocreateormaintainrapport,toexpressadmirationorapproval,toencourage,toexpresspositiveevaluation,tostrengthenortoreplaceotherspeechactformulas;and(3)themostgivenresponsestowardthosecomplimentswereemployingappreciationtoken,verballyandnon-verballyacceptance.Thesimilaritybetweenthetwostudieswasontheobjectused,WhiteChicks film. The differences showed that (1) Kuncoro’s study was a linguisticresearchdiscussingaboutcomplimentexpressions,whilethecurrentstudywasaliteratureoneconcerningabouttheJungianarchetypes;(2)Kuncoro’sstudyfocuseditsanalysisonallthecharactersinWhiteChicksfilmwhichdifferedfromthecurrentstudy.Thecurrentstudyonlyfocuseditsarchetypalanalysisonthemaincharactersofthefilm,KevinandMarcus.E.CONCLUSIONS

ThisstudyfoundthatToomcharacterofBeautifulBoxerfilmportrayedthreetypes of archetype (persona, shadow, and anima), while Kevin and Marcuscharacters ofWhite Chicks film portrayed two types of archetype (persona andshadow). The fact that animus archetype was not portrayed by the three mencharacters was because animus exists in women as their masculine traits. ThesimilarityofarchetypeportrayedbyToom,Kevin,andMarcuscharacterswasthatthethreeofthemusedpersonaandanima,whilethedifferenceappearedonToomcharacterastheonlyonewhousedshadowtocontainhisoppresseddesires.

REFERENCES

“BeautifulBoxer.”EnglishSubtitles.Isubtitles.info.2003.Web.11Dec.2018.

Adamski,Adam.“ArchetypesandtheCollectiveUnconsciousofCarlG.JungintheLightofQuantumPsychology.”NeuroQuantology9.3,(2011):565-566.Web.07Nov.2018.

Page 13: ARCHETYPAL CHARACTERS IN BEAUTIFUL BOXER AND WHITE …

e-ISSN 2549-7715 | Volume 4 | Nomor 1 | Januari 2020 | Hal: 145-157

Terakreditasi Sinta 4

157

BeautifulBoxer.Dir.EkachaiUekrongtham.GMMPictures/RegentReleasing/TLAReleasing,2003.DVD.

Boeree,C.George.“CarlJung-PersonalityTheories.”ShippensburgUniversity,2006.Web.07Nov.2018.

Daniels,Victor.“TheAnalyticalPsychologyofCarlGustavJung.”MatrixMeditations,2011.Web.11Oct.2018.

Dialek,CindyL.“GenderPerformativityinEkachaiUekrongtham’sBeautifulBoxer.”Allusion2.1,2013.Surabaya:UniversitasAirlangga.Web.07Nov.2018.

Fan,Yanhong.“AnalysisofArchetypalCharacterJimCasyinTheGrapesofWrath.”TheoryandPracticeinLanguageStudies4.12,(2014):2576-2580.Changchun:ChangchunUniversityofScienceandTechnology.PDF.

Fleer,BenjaminE.TheApplicationofJungianArchetypestotheAnalysisofCharacterin three Early Plays by W.B. Yeats. Thesis. Kansas: University of Missouri-KansasCity.2014.Web.07Nov.2018.

Kuncoro, Sapto.TheAnalysis of Compliment Expression in the Film entitledWhiteChicks(ASocio-PragmaticsStudy).Surakarta:SebelasMaretUniversity.2010.PDF.

Rokhmansyah,Alfian,andRatnaAsmarani.“StrukturKetaksadaranKolektifTokohUtamaDalamNovel ‘TheSweetSins’KaryaRanggaWiriantoPutra.”Aksara,vol.30,no.2,Dec.2018,pp.221–36,doi:10.29255/aksara.v30i2.321.221-236.

Rokhmansyah,Alfian.“StrukturKepribadianTokohUtamaDalamNovelTheSweetSins Karya RanggaWirianto Putra.”Deiksis, vol. 5, no. 2, 2018, pp. 25–36,http://jurnal.unswagati.ac.id/index.php/Deiksis/article/view/1139.

Wandira, Jenny, Yusak Hudiyono, & Alfian Rokhmansyah. "Kepribadian TokohAminah DalamNovel Derita Aminah Karya Nurul Fithrati: Kajian PsikologiSastra."IlmuBudaya:JurnalBahasa,Sastra,SenidanBudaya,vol.3,no.4,2019,pp.413-419.

Wayans,KeenenI.“WhiteChicks.”FilmScript.Script-O-Rama.com.2004.Web.11Dec.2018.

WhiteChicks.Dir.KeenenIvoryWayans.SonyPicturesReleasing,2004.DVD.

Young, Bridget, and Hren Darko. Introduction To Qualitative Research Methods.MethodsInResearchOnResearch(MIROR),n.d.Web.08Nov.2018.