arch 211 design ii: basic architectural designmyweb.wit.edu/kiml1/211spr04/images/syllabus.pdf ·...

Department of Architecture: Wentworth Institute of Technology

© Prof. Madhu C Dutta of 5

ARCH 211 DESIGN II: BASIC ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN Course Syllabus: Spring 2004 Meeting Times Class Days Time Studio Monday 1:00 pm – 5pm Studio Friday 1:00 pm – 4pm The instructor may schedule additional class hours as per his/her discretion. Instructor Section/Room # Phone number Email Address Madhu C Dutta 01+ 02 ANXCN-302 617-989 4926 [email protected] 07 + 08 ANXCN-301 617-9894459 Pereira-Devoe 03 + 04 ANXCN-105 [email protected] Humphreys 05 + 06 ANXCN-108 [email protected] Lora Kim 09 + 10 ANXCN-103 617-256 0638 [email protected] Isaac Persley 11 +12 ANXCN-306 [email protected] Anya Bokov 13 +14 ANXCN-307 [email protected] COURSE DESCRIPTION 4 Credit Hours Students explore the design of form and space through a series of design studies for small architectural projects. Students participate in Boston field trips that include on-site sketching and visual analysis of buildings. Design Processes investigate historic precedent, human factors, site influences, physical systems and available technologies. Pre Requisite: ARCH 185 Design I with a “C” grade or better. GENERAL OUTLINE The idea that the architectural design process involves constructing propositions about space through the engagement of formal strategies as well as instinctual perceptions is central to the this studio process. The students are encouraged to think of designing, not merely as an act of problem solving but an exploration through “making” and “discovery”. While the application of traditional knowledge, both from an academic standpoint as well as that generated from prior experiences is an integral part of the studio; students are encouraged to challenge the preconceived notions and think beyond the expected.

The studio will operate in a “workshop” environment where communication, participation and collaboration between different entities within the school of architecture, related disciplines in the University and with the city of Boston at large. . . is one of the primary pedagogical objectives.

The studio strives to foster an integrated environment where the design studio as well as other courses offered during the semester is expected to generate a meaningful dialogue and provide for a symbiotic relationship geared towards a holistic architectural education. In this studio, the students will be guided through a sequential series of exercises (which at times will have a non- linear approach) that build upon one another in such a way that a final architectural solution results. We will be concerned primarily this semester with the analysis, study of precedents, and complexities of site, topography and context. Concurrently, we will explore such topics as concept; programming, space making and planning; spatial sequencing, ordering, structural systems (primarily steel structures resulting in long span spaces); enclosure and daylighting and a basic awareness of various building systems and some elements of master planning, tectonic and material investigations. The studio will be organized into two projects. Project One involves contextual and architectural analysis and concept generating as we explore in graphic and model form a series of architectural (urban) interventions (at a human scale) along selected subway lines in the city of Boston. Project Two will be sited along the Charles River and involves the design of Boathouse. The design will be explored at various scales ranging from the relationship of the building to the landscape, to the specific details within the building itself as it relates to the boats as well as the people inhabiting the space. The design will also involve explorations of the relationship between land and water. The structure may encompass, but is not limited to, a “courtyard” space, a



large-span space for gathering/Visitor’s Information Center, a tower element for observation and medium-sized and smaller support spaces. Substantial development of the space is expected at this stage which will be generated from an initial master/site plan. Concurrently, means of visual communication and conventions will be emphasized upon. A sketchbook recording discovery and analysis of historical, local, and contemporary precedents as well as individual design strategies and solutions will be maintained throughout the semester. EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES In order to progress to third year the student must successfully complete the portfolio review and show: A. demonstrated awareness of the following: 1. historical/contemporary precedents 2. architectural theory 3. issues of contemporary design 4 the complexity of context

5. codes, specifically the ADA, UBC life safety (building type), and zoning B. demonstrated understanding in the following: 1. architectural conceptualization and ordering 2. use of analogy/metaphor/meaning 3. behavioral and social interaction factors 4. programming/spatial specification 5. tectonics 6. the master plan 7. topography and grading C. demonstrated ability in: Craft skills: 1. diagramming/ drawing techniques for analysis/ freehand drawing 2. conventions of architectural drawing 3. perspective/ isometric drawing 4. study and finished models 5. presentation graphics, including the use of the computer

Thinking Skills: 1. data gathering/field and archival research 2. the process of design 3. organization strategies 4. use of color 5. writing ability 6. ability to work in group design 7. verbal presentation technique 8. response to the imperatives of nature

9. site analysis and the mechanics of site manipulation READINGS REQUIRED TEXT:

• Mills, B Criss: Designing with Models STRONGLY SUGGESTED TEXT:

• Edward, Allen: Architect's Studio Companion, 2002 • Edward, Allen: How Buildings Work • Melet, Ed: The Architectural Detail: Dutch Architects visualize their Concepts • White, Edward T: Site Analysis • White, Edward T: Space Adjacency Analysis



OTHER READINGS: • Italo, Calvino: Invisible Cities • Frampton, Kenneth: Studies in Tectonic Culture • Frampton, Kenneth: Technology, Place and Architecture: the Jerusalem Seminar in Architecture, Rizzoli, 1998 • Leupen Bernard: Design and Analysis, 010 Publishers, 1997 • Leatherbarrow David and Mostafavi Mohsen: Surface Architecture,2002

EXCERPTED READINGS

• R Krauss: "Mechanical ballets: Light, Motion, Theater", Passages into Modern Sculpture, pgs 201,242 • Clark, R. and Pause, M: Analysis of Precedent

"Elements: Circulation" pp. 12-19 "Relationships: Circulation to Use" pp. 90-97

• Cook, Peter: Primer "Architecture in Context" Chap. 2

"Entering and Identifying" Chap. 4 "Circulation and Planning" Chap. 5

"Space" Chap. 7 • Rasmussen, S: Experiencing Architecture

"Daylighting in Architecture" Chap. 8 • Todd: Site, Space and Structure

"Typological Definition and Development” Chap. 2 "Climate and Energy" Chap. 3 "Circulation" Chap. 4

• Unwin, S: Analyzing Architecture pp. 1-43 "Introduction" "Architecture as Identification of Place" "Basic Elements of Architecture" "Modifying Elements of Architecture" "Elements Doing More than One Thing" "Using Things that are There"

• White, Edward: Concept Source Book "Architectural Space: Circulation pp.65-98

"Functional Grouping and Zoning" pp.35-63 • Boyer, M.C.: The City of Collective Memory

"Topographical Travelogues and City Views" • Clark, R. and Pause, M: Analysis of Precedent

"LeCorbusier" • Cook, Peter: Primer

"Structures" Chap. 7 "Creating the Skin" Chap. 8

• Gehl, J.: Life Between Buildings "Spaces for Walking, Places for Staying: Detail Planning" pp. 131-164

• Todd: Site, Space and Structure "Space" Chap. 2

• Unwin, S: Analyzing Architecture pp. 99-161 "Geometry in Architecture" "Space and Structure" "Parallel Walls" "Stratification" "Transition, Hierarchy, Heart" GENERAL REFERENCES: Ching, F: Form, Space and Order Ching. F: Building Construction Illustrated Laseau: Graphic Thinking for Architects ATTENDANCE POLICY: Please note that attendance is mandatory. Each student is expected to be in the studio and ready to work by the beginning of class. This means having required work and materials out and ready. Part of your grade will be



determined by class participation. Students may miss a maximum of four (4) studio meetings during the semester with prior consent of the instructor, beginning after the second studio meeting, without a medical excuse. If a student misses more than four studios without a written medical excuse, and only medical excuses will be accepted, the student will be subject to an 'F' for the studio. Roll will be taken. ASSIGNMENTS/SUBMITTED WORK/LATE WORK: Projects are due at the beginning of class on the due date. Work will then be either exhibited for presentation and discussion, or review individually. Except in cases of excused absences, no late projects will be accepted. Since there are many parts of this course, it is important that you budget your time. This is a personal skill that will serve you well in the years ahead. All written work submitted for this course must meet the Standards for English I. Poorly written papers will be returned to you, without a grade, for revision. Students are encouraged to utilize the Writing Center facility for help polishing their papers. GRADING AND STUDENT EVALUATION SYSTEM Your grade will be based on the following factors: Project One 25% Project Two 65% Sketchbook, Participation, Attendance 10% Total 100 %

Emphasis is placed on process as well as product. Plagiarism is taken very seriously at the University and maybe a cause for dismissal. Preparation and participation in class discussions, lectures and the studio is key to this course. Preparation for studio must be done before the assigned studio time. Studio attendance is required by all students for the complete duration of the studio time. Student participation in individual and group discussions is required. This grade breakdown is based upon a student displaying effort in every part of the course. If a student shows no effort in some part of the course (e.g. readings, or displays disregard for course content by repeated tardiness; lack of attendance in class or on a field trip; or walking out of class), the studio instructor will have the option of marking the student's final grade down by 1 full grade level. A Exceptional effort in realizing the intent or focus of the assignment; superb skill relative to the assignment; strong participation in class discussions. Meets due dates. Strong attendance. Research, readings, and effort exceed project requirements. Student's presence adds to the educational experience of the rest of the class. B Above average comprehension and expression of studio projects. Strong skill. Meets due dates. Strong attendance and participation. Research, readings, and effort exceed project requirements. C Average. Meets but does not exceed minimum project requirements. Participation and skill are adequate. Meets due dates. Strong attendance. D Not a passing grade. Projects are weak in addressing central issues of the assignment; poor skill; incomplete projects, or failure to meet due dates; weak participation in class discussions; weak aptitude for design. Student might want to consider other career options. F Not a passing grade. Projects do not embody central issues of the assignments; poor skill; unexcused absences, incomplete projects, or failure to meet due dates; lack of participation in class discussions; lack of aptitude for design as expressed in the work. All students are expected to hand in digital and physical documentation of their work for the semester (as instructed by the studio instructor) as part of the course requirements. ACADEMIC CONDUCT & HONESTY

Each student is responsible for reading and being familiar with Wentworth's Academic Honesty and Conduct Policy.

http://public.wit.edu/%7EProvost/AcadConduct&Honesty.htm



DESIGN II: STUDIO TIMELINE SPRING 2004 Week Dates/ Studio Work Section/ Discussion 1 January

12 Introduction to faculty and discussion about the semester Issue: Project 1-Part 1 16

-Contextual / Site Analysis -Precedent Studies -Projection Conception

2 19 MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BIRTHDAY - NO CLASSES 23 Due: Part 1

-Review -Discussion of project

3 26 30 Due: Part 2 (Digital documentation of project required in a CD) Issue: Project 2

-Discussion of project ideas -Review of Project 1

4 February 2 Field trip 6

-Contextual Analysis -Site Analysis (macro/micro)

5 9 Due: Site Analysis 13

-Review

6 16 PRESIDENT'S DAY - NO CLASSES 20

-Programmatic Analysis

7 23 24 MID TERM GRADES DUE 27

Design Synthesis -Concept -Master /Site planning

8 March 1 Due: Design Concept, Site/Master Plan 5

9 8 SPRING BREAK 12 SPRING BREAK

10 15 19

-Day Lighting, Enclosure, Tectonics

11 22 STUDENT PORTFOLIOS DUE (FOR ADMISSION TO THE BARCH PROGRAM) 26

-Detailing and other Issues (see syllabus

12 29 Due: Preliminary Drawings etc. April 2

Semi-Formal Review

13 5 FOUNDER'S DAY - CENTENNIAL ANNIVERSARY 9

14 12 16

Presentation Strategies

15 19 23 LAST DAY OF CLASSES Due: Final Work for the semester (Digital documentation of project required in a CD)

• Final Reviews will be scheduled during 24th April –30th April, 2004 as per Department Final Review Schedule. There will be no make-up presentations, no time extensions, and no excuses for failing to be in class on time and present your final solution unless there is a medical emergency.

• Grades due on Tuesday, 4th May, 2004 by 12noon.

arch 211 design ii: basic architectural designmyweb.wit.edu/kiml1/211spr04/images/syllabus.pdf ·...

Documents