arbitrary products are coproducts in complete (v-) semilattices

2
Algebra Univ. 6 (1976) 97-98 Birkh~iuser Verlag, Basel 97 Arbitrary products are coproducts in complete (v-)semilattices Dana May Latch It is well known that in the category of sets, products and coproducts fail to be isomorphic since coproduct is disjoint union. Certain categories of universal algebras (e.g. modules, abelian groups, etc.) provide examples of set-based categories where finite products and coproducts coincide, but arbitrary products and coproducts need not be isomorphic [cf. 2, p. 86]. Here we present an example of a set-based category (which is 'algebraic', although it involves a proper class of operations) where arbitrary products and coproducts coincide. Note that one cannot expect to find such an example among the usual categories of (universal) algebras, possibly with infinitary operations allowed. Suppose ~ is a nontrivial complete (i.e. closed under the formation of arbitrary products and sub- objects) category of universal algebras. Let ~ be the smallest infinite regular cardinal greater than the arities ofaU operations in ~r and greater than the number of primitive or defining operations. Suppose A is a finitely generated free algebra on more than one generator; then 1 ~<[IAII ~<dt'. Assume that A "tt represents the .A'-fold coproduct of copies of A with natural injections u~: A ~ A n for ct< ~'. Then A "tt would be generated by U u,(A), and hence has at most ..r elements, since any Jg-generated algebra in A has at most Jg elements (from the choice of,A'). If products and coproducts were isomor- phic in d, then 2"a= IIA~II =.A', a contradiction. The promised example is the category 6: of complete (v-) semilattices, i.e. the objects of 5: are complete posets ['1, p. 29] and the morphisms are the (poset) maps preserving all suprema. Products in 5a are set-theoretic products with order defined 'component-wise'. For a family {Si [ i~I} of complete semilattices and each j~L define uj:S i ~ I-I: s~ to be the map such that id if i=j PiUi= O~ if i#j; where p~II si ~ si is the ith projection map and O~:Sj~ S~ is the constant map with value O~ (the supremum in S~ of ~b). It is clear that uj preserve suprema. Furthermore, I-I s~ is generated, as a complete semilattice, by U uj (Sj); i.e. xel-Is ~ implies x= V ujpjx. Suppose {f~: S, ~ S[i~Z} is any collection ofmorphisms in 5:, thenf: 1-'[S, ~ 5: given by f((xl)i~1)= V fi(x~) is easily seen to be the unique morphism in 5a such that fu~=f~ for every i~L Hence arbitrary products and coproducts coincide in 50. Presentedby G. Griitzer. ReceivedOctober 2, 1974. Accepted for publication in final form August 12. 1975.

Upload: dana-may-latch

Post on 13-Aug-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Arbitrary products are coproducts in complete (v-) semilattices

Algebra Univ. 6 (1976) 97-98 Birkh~iuser Verlag, Basel 97

Arbitrary products are coproducts in complete (v-)semilattices

Dana May Latch

It is well known that in the category of sets, products and coproducts fail to be isomorphic since coproduct is disjoint union. Certain categories of universal algebras (e.g. modules, abelian groups, etc.) provide examples of set-based categories where finite products and coproducts coincide, but arbitrary products and coproducts need not be isomorphic [cf. 2, p. 86]. Here we present an example of a set-based category (which is 'algebraic', although it involves a proper class of operations) where arbitrary products and coproducts coincide.

Note that one cannot expect to find such an example among the usual categories of (universal) algebras, possibly with infinitary operations allowed. Suppose ~ is a nontrivial complete (i.e. closed under the formation of arbitrary products and sub- objects) category of universal algebras. Let ~ be the smallest infinite regular cardinal greater than the arities ofaU operations in ~r and greater than the number of primitive or defining operations. Suppose A is a finitely generated free algebra on more than one generator; then 1 ~< [IAII ~<dt'. Assume that A "tt represents the .A'-fold coproduct of copies of A with natural injections u~: A ~ A n for ct < ~ ' . Then A "tt would be generated by U u,(A), and hence has at most ..r elements, since any Jg-generated algebra in A has at most Jg elements (from the choice of,A'). If products and coproducts were isomor- phic in d , then 2"a= IIA~II =.A', a contradiction.

The promised example is the category 6: of complete (v- ) semilattices, i.e. the objects of 5: are complete posets ['1, p. 29] and the morphisms are the (poset) maps preserving all suprema. Products in 5 a are set-theoretic products with order defined 'component-wise'. For a family {Si [ i~I} of complete semilattices and each j ~ L define uj:S i ~ I-I: s~ to be the map such that

id if i=j PiUi= O~ if i#j;

where p~II si ~ si is the ith projection map and O~:Sj~ S~ is the constant map with value O~ (the supremum in S~ of ~b). It is clear that uj preserve suprema. Furthermore, I-I s~ is generated, as a complete semilattice, by U uj (Sj); i.e. x e l - I s ~ implies x = V ujpjx. Suppose {f~: S, ~ S[i~Z} is any collection ofmorphisms in 5:, then f : 1-'[ S, ~ 5: given by f((xl)i~1)= V fi(x~) is easily seen to be the unique morphism in 5 a such that fu~=f~ for every i~L Hence arbitrary products and coproducts coincide in 50.

Presented by G. Griitzer. Received October 2, 1974. Accepted for publication in final form August 12. 1975.

Page 2: Arbitrary products are coproducts in complete (v-) semilattices

98 Dana May Latch

Note that the same argument yields a similar result for the category 6a~ of ./[-complete semilattices, where ~ ' is an infinite regular cardinal. S#~ is the category whose objects are posets in which every set with fewer than ~ elements has a supremum, and whose morphisms are maps which preserve suprema of sets with fewer than ..r elements. Then in S:~, the product of any family which is indexed by fewer than ~ ' elements is the coproduct of that family. In view of the above remarks, this is the best one can do.

Statement of priority

The principal result of this note was obtained by the author early in 1967 while a thesis student of Alex Heller. She is indebted to the referee for the information that A. G. Waterman lectured on a similar result in the fall of 1966.

REFERENCES

[1] G. Gr~tzer, Lattice Theory, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1971. [2] B. Mitchell, Theory of Categories, Academic Press, New York, 1965.

Lawrence University Appleton, Wisconsin U.S.A.