arabisms in rabbinic literature

Download Arabisms in Rabbinic Literature

Post on 07-Jan-2017

212 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • Arabisms in Rabbinic LiteratureFremdsprachliche Redensarten by Adolf BrllReview by: A. CohenThe Jewish Quarterly Review, New Series, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Oct., 1912), pp. 221-233Published by: University of Pennsylvania PressStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1451143 .Accessed: 16/05/2014 09:18

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

    .

    University of Pennsylvania Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to TheJewish Quarterly Review.

    http://www.jstor.org

    This content downloaded from 194.29.185.49 on Fri, 16 May 2014 09:18:03 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=upennhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/1451143?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • ARABISMS IN RABBINIC LITERATURE

    BY A. COHEN, Manchester

    IN the Talmud and Midrashim, fourteen words occur which purport to be Arabic. They are quoted, usually by R. Levi,' for the purpose of explaining words of the Bible the meaning of which had become forgotten, or as a basis for a homiletic interpretation.2 The following is a list of them. For reasons to be afterwards explained, they are divided into two classes.

    Class I

    nt5bSb13 tp, 't135 ,'lnpip '3', (C3 KN3D K83 W p11p K31) Y3 K;1I WiY 4 1WV (4

    xnnm Knr'31 lrnis K NvrIn C5 5lnv wlr b plp ^:n:1 (6

    snn,nm nrm'nn5 pmnip =3n?:3 (7 ,n'l tqp 3b rnnvi w:'3n: (8

    o R. Li a aid ll1 bt N n (io K813W KnSi'nnS fsnn^ K^3l^3 (O

    1 To R. Levi are ascribed all but Nos. 12 and I3. No. 7 is also quoted

    as an 'Arabism' by R. Eleazar b. Simeon. Akiba quotes No. 8 as used in

    C,'Il Dt', and No. IO is quoted by Resh Laskish as a word found in the

    language of Vi: 'l )p.

    2 To the former class belong Nos. I, 2, 6, 9, 10, 12, 13, I4; to the latter

    Nos. 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, ii. ,

    221

    This content downloaded from 194.29.185.49 on Fri, 16 May 2014 09:18:03 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 222 THE JEWISH QUARTERLY REVIEW

    Class II

    sin rlyy tlWS L37 ( I

    ITn' Iipv InD [mNZ,1V Wl:n] Nr10a (12

    23 MD=D rnN IM 'm:I m h'3 (13

    mn n3 4 l pW :3p CI4

    These words raise a perplexing problem. In very few cases can they be referred with confidence to the

    Arabic; in some cases a resemblance can be detected; but in the majority of instances, the words are Aramaic or

    altogether unknown.

    Two theories have been advanced to explain these facts. Firstly, it is suggested that n'yr does not mean

    Arabia, but is to be identified with Arrabeh, a Galilean town near Sepphoris.8 Against this it might be urged that no reason can be assigned why an insignificant town should be specially mentioned for its dialect, and not the country or district in which it is situated.4 Further, how, on this

    theory, are the genuine Arabic words to be accounted for? The second theory is that the language referred to is a dialect of Arabic which contained a large admixture of Aramaic.! If this were correct, we see from the instances

    preserved for us in rabbinical literature that the predomin- ance of Aramaic in this dialect over Arabic was truly re- markable.

    8 Adolf Briill, Fremdsprachliche Redensarten (Leipzig i869), p. 29. 4 Thus the Galilean dialect is mentioned in Gen. r., ch. 26, ? 7. Bacher

    declares, "Wir horen nicht dass er [R. Levi] ausserhalb des heiligen Landes sich aufgehalten hatte," Agada der pal. Amorder, II, 303. It is nowhere expressly stated that he traveled to Arabia. But his knowledge of Arabian customs (see I(am. r., Proem. 23, ed. Buber, p. 20; Eccles. r. on 12, 8, and

    Tantuma, nlsll, ? Ii) leads one to suppose that he had journeyed to that

    country.

    So Briill, 1. c., p. 40; Kohut, Aruch, s. v. ID (p. 48); Bacher, 1. c.

    This content downloaded from 194.29.185.49 on Fri, 16 May 2014 09:18:03 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • ARABISMS IN RABBINIC LITVRATURE-COHEN 223

    Would it not, therefore, be more probable to suppose that there was an Aramaic-speaking colony settled in Arabia? Modern discoveries have shown us how widely spread was the Aramaic language in all parts of the Eastern World. Endorsements on Assyrian and Babylonian con-

    tracts, papyri from Egypt, and Aramaic inscriptions from Arabia testify to this in ample manner.6 The Assuan papyri disclose the existence of a Jewish colony in Egypt using the Aramaic language. There is consequently nothing a

    priori improbable in the supposition that there was a Jew- ish colony, settled in Arabia, which preserved the Aramaic

    tongue of the mother-country. Such a dialect would nat-

    urally continue to use many words which had become obsolete elsewhere, since the rate of change in a language is much slower in the provincial districts.7 It would also

    incorporate words from the vernacular of the country. These two facts, added to the usual differences of pronunci- ation to be found in dialects, will account for practically all the 'Arabisms' in the rabbinic literature.

    One important indication that the 'Arabisms' are really traces of an Aramaic dialect spoken in Arabia has hitherto

    escaped notice. There is a marked difference in the phrase- ology which contains an 'Arabism' and that which contains a reference to another language. In Class I we have uni-

    formly tl'p :nyr "In Arabia they call, etc."8 This need not necessarily mean that the word which follows is Arabic. When, for instance, the Talmud declares lpip 5::

    :~n Ppl'5: (Sukkah 5b, .tagigah I3b), we do not infer

    6 See Lidzbarski, Ephemeris fiir semitische Epigraphik, II, 200 ff., and

    Cooke, North Semitic Inscriptions, pp. I95 ff.

    7 Comp. e. g. the French spoken by Canadian colonists with that of France.

    8 The only exception is No. 4, which will be discussed below.

    This content downloaded from 194.29.185.49 on Fri, 16 May 2014 09:18:03 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 224 THE JEWISH QUARTERLY REVIEW

    that ,:n is a genuine Babylonian word. The statement

    merely means that, whereas xqpMI was used in Palestinian

    Aramaic, si:n was usual in Babylonian Aramaic. In similar manner SN'P SnvrS iplip : in3: may only mean that xqnI: was the word employed for 'lamb' by the

    Aramaic-speaking Jews of Arabia.9

    Further, despite the fact that the rabbinic literature contains over twenty references to the Greek language, we do not once find the formula tpnip tl: "In Greece, they call, etc." Instead we meet with such expressions as:

    (Gen. r., ch. 8I, ? 5) Nin nri ptv5 1K

    (Gen. r., ch. 40, ? 4) in ri1 1WS DDS

    (Shabbat 63b) o13 n5: lip l 1 pIr 3

    (Tanhuma, 1x) 51rw N:Dap ,eDDtI p1W

    (Abodah zarah 24b) n,n ntbS ,KNac rinp

    (Abodah zarah 24b) wnrn n'i5 ,'DI ~np

    In all these instances, the phraseology indicates beyond doubt that a Greek or Persian word is intended. These are to be compared with some of the Arabisms contained in Class II, but are quite distinct from those enumerated in Class I.

    Hence, with few exceptions, the 'Arabisms' in the rabbinic literature presuppose the settlement of a colony of Jews' in Arabia, where Aramaic continued to hold its own against the vernacular. That the migration took place

    9 Contrast the two statements fl1'p 1', 1piBfc' ,*n:t- : p"Y '1 7k4 Ut'ap r.YZi (Rosh ha-shanah 26a) and t =new' EsnI tIt K311py '1 'In

    CPri P?'1K8 (Sanhedrin 4b). In the former case a Hebrew word used by

    African Jews is clearly intended, in the latter a native word. 10 That they were Jews is evidenced by the presence of Hebrew words

    in Aramaic form.

    This content downloaded from 194.29.185.49 on Fri, 16 May 2014 09:18:03 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • ARABISMS IN RABBINIC LIUTRATURE-COHEN 225

    at an early date, long before the commencement of the current era, may be inferred from the presence of words which had passed out of use in Palestinian and Babylonian Aramaic. Especially interesting is the apparent survival in Aramaic form of Hebrew words which had become obsolete,

    :1a, nD5Dt, Xtilp, and wnm.

    The following is a detailed discussion of the words:

    Class I

    RSnr (1)

    (p. Berakot 9, I end) m5:z mn'vI5 Ipip :ar:a 5 :a n -nt

    "R. Levi said, In Arabia they call a lamb pobla." Quoted to explain i:sn 'Tln' n,m (Josh. 6, 5). Comp. vytwn ,w Nn* mvn w: 4pS '- -in Ni ? Kim Kin K wr8 Nh RIr 4w

    Sv,' bnn- pnilp in m:n5S "How do we know that the word 1tbla is an expression for 'lamb'? For it has been

    taught in a Baraita, R. Akiba says, when I went to Arabia, they were calling a 'lamb' obbla" (Rosh ha-shanah 26a). Kohut refers to uabilat(un) which is sometimes used in the sense of 'lambs,' but more commonly of 'camels.' But the word is obviously the Hebrew 5:11. We here meet it

    among an Aramaic-speaking colony in Arabia, just as it has been discov

Recommended

View more >