appendix m: initial alternative development ... shawn, thomas witt and i reviewed and have some...
TRANSCRIPT
App
endi
x M
:
INIT
IAL
ALT
ERN
ATIV
ED
EVEL
OPM
ENT
INIT
IAL
ALT
ERN
ATIV
ED
EVEL
OPM
ENT
MEM
OR
AN
DU
MA
ND
ASS
OC
IATE
DFI
LES
MEM
OR
AN
DU
MA
ND
ASS
OC
IATE
DFI
LES
TO:
To
m H
all,
PE
Ju
di H
icke
rson
M
ikae
l Pel
frey,
PE
P
roje
ct M
anag
er(s
), K
YTC
FRO
M:
Sha
wn
Dik
es, A
ICP
P
roje
ct M
anag
er, P
arso
ns B
rinck
erho
ff
DA
TE:
Febr
uary
25,
201
4
R
evis
ed M
arch
4, 2
014
SU
BJE
CT:
I-2
65 P
rogr
amm
ing
Stu
dy
Item
No.
N/A
E
xpla
natio
n of
Fre
eway
Alte
rnat
ives
and
Ana
lysi
s M
etho
dolo
gy
Proj
ect B
ackg
roun
d an
d St
udy
Are
a
The
purp
ose
of th
is m
emor
andu
m is
to d
ocum
ent t
he fr
eew
ay a
ltern
ativ
es th
at w
ill b
e an
alyz
ed,
as w
ell a
s th
e an
alys
is m
etho
dolo
gy th
at w
ill b
e pe
rform
ed, a
s pa
rt of
the
I-265
Pro
gram
min
g S
tudy
that
is c
urre
ntly
bei
ng p
erfo
rmed
by
Par
sons
Brin
cker
hoff.
A to
tal o
f six
alte
rnat
ives
will
be
eval
uate
d us
ing
the
FRE
EV
AL
anal
ysis
tool
. The
se in
clud
e:
1.
Exi
stin
g B
asel
ine
Con
ditio
n: I-
265
as it
ope
rate
s to
day
(com
plet
e).
2.
2020
No
Bui
ld: T
his
incl
udes
iden
tifie
d 20
12 S
ix-Y
ear H
ighw
ay P
lan
and
TIP
pro
ject
s to
ai
d op
erat
ions
/ sa
fety
and
/or i
ncre
ase
capa
city
that
wou
ld b
e in
pla
ce b
y 20
20.
3.
2020
Bui
ld:
This
inc
lude
s al
l pr
ojec
ts t
hat
are
iden
tifie
d to
be
in p
lace
by
2020
(al
l pr
ojec
ts fr
om A
ltern
ativ
e 2
and
othe
r sm
all p
roje
cts
to a
ddre
ss a
ny id
entif
ied
‘hot
spo
ts’).
4.
20
40 N
o B
uild
: Th
is in
clud
es a
ll pr
ojec
ts in
pla
ce b
y 20
40.
Thi
s w
ill in
clud
e pr
ojec
ts
assu
med
in th
e m
odel
ing
effo
rt, m
ost n
otab
ly a
n ex
tra la
ne in
eac
h di
rect
ion
from
I-65
to
I-71.
5.
2040
+ C
olle
ctor
-Dis
tribu
tor (
C-D
) Roa
d: T
his
incl
udes
all
proj
ects
from
Alt
4, p
lus
a C
-D
Roa
d be
ginn
ing
just
nor
th o
f Old
Hen
ry R
oad
and
runn
ing
thro
ugh
US
60
and
I-64,
and
te
rmin
atin
g be
twee
n I-6
4 an
d th
e K
Y 1
55 in
terc
hang
e.
6.
2040
+ 2
Cap
acity
Lan
es: T
his
incl
udes
eve
ryth
ing
from
Alte
rnat
ive
4, p
lus
an a
dditi
onal
ca
paci
ty la
ne fr
om I-
65 to
I-71
for a
tota
l of t
wo
addi
tiona
l lan
es p
er d
irect
ion.
The
proj
ects
that
are
refe
renc
ed a
bove
incl
uded
in th
e 20
12 S
ix-Y
ear H
ighw
ay P
lan
and
TIP
are
di
scus
sed
belo
w a
nd re
fere
nce
whi
ch a
ltern
ativ
e th
ey a
re in
clud
ed in
.
Ite
m N
o. 5
-700
.00:
Eas
t End
Brid
ge –
cur
rent
ly u
nder
con
stru
ctio
n an
d w
ill b
e co
mpl
eted
be
fore
202
0, a
nd w
ill b
e in
clud
ed in
Alte
rnat
ives
2, 3
, 4, 5
and
6.
Ite
m N
o. 5
-21.
00:
I-265
and
I-6
4 in
terc
hang
e re
cons
truct
ion
– th
e 20
14 d
raft
high
way
pl
an h
as c
onst
ruct
ion
fund
s al
lotte
d fo
r 20
19.
Ther
efor
e, t
his
will
be
incl
uded
in
Alte
rnat
ives
3, 4
, 5 a
nd 6
. The
reco
nstru
ctio
n w
ill in
clud
e a
NB
to W
B 2
lane
flyo
ver,
and
a S
B to
WB
2 la
ne ra
mp.
Item
No.
5-4
8.30
: I-2
65 a
nd I
-71
inte
rcha
nge
reco
nstru
ctio
n –
the
2014
dra
ft hi
ghw
ay
plan
has
con
stru
ctio
n fu
nds
allo
tted
for
inte
rim i
mpr
ovem
ents
in
2016
. Th
eref
ore
the
inte
rim i
mpr
ovem
ents
will
be
incl
uded
in
Alte
rnat
ives
2,
3, 4
, 5
and
6, a
nd t
he f
ull
impr
ovem
ents
will
be
incl
uded
in A
ltern
ativ
es 4
, 5, a
nd 6
.
Ite
m N
o. 5
-264
.10:
US
31E
and
I-2
65 in
terc
hang
e im
prov
emen
ts t
o pr
ovid
e tu
rn la
nes
and
new
acc
ess
– cu
rrent
ly u
nder
con
stru
ctio
n an
d w
ill b
e co
mpl
eted
bef
ore
2020
, and
w
ill b
e in
clud
ed in
Alte
rnat
ives
2, 3
, 4, 5
and
6.
Ite
m N
o. 5
-474
.00
& 5
-367
.00:
KY
308
4 an
d I-2
65 i
nter
chan
ge i
mpr
ovem
ents
and
co
nstru
ctio
n of
new
4-la
ne r
oute
fro
m I
-265
to
KY
22
– in
clud
ed i
n 20
12 S
ix-Y
ear
Hig
hway
Pla
n, a
nd a
ssum
ed to
be
com
plet
ed b
y 20
20. W
ill b
e in
clud
ed in
Alte
rnat
ives
2,
3, 4
, 5 a
nd 6
.
Wid
enin
g of
I-26
5 fro
m I-
65 to
I-71
– p
art o
f KY
TC’s
long
rang
e pl
an a
nd w
ill b
e in
clud
ed
in A
ltern
ativ
es 4
, 5 a
nd 6
.
It sh
ould
be
note
d th
at th
ere
has
been
dis
cuss
ion
abou
t whe
ther
or
not a
new
inte
rcha
nge
will
be
con
stru
cted
at R
ehl R
oad.
At t
his
poin
t, it
is b
eing
ass
umed
that
the
inte
rcha
nge
will
not
be
built
; the
refo
re it
is n
ot in
clud
ed in
any
of t
he a
ltern
ativ
es.
As
men
tione
d pr
evio
usly
, FR
EE
VA
L w
ill b
e us
ed to
ana
lyze
eac
h of
thes
e sc
enar
ios.
Fre
eway
ge
omet
rics
like
acce
lera
tion
/ dec
eler
atio
n le
ngth
s, a
uxili
ary
lane
s an
d nu
mbe
r of
lane
s ca
n be
m
odifi
ed r
elat
ivel
y ea
sily
for
each
sce
nario
. If t
hese
mod
ifica
tions
do
not i
mpr
ove
oper
atio
ns a
t an
inte
rcha
nge
or c
erta
in a
rea
with
in th
e st
udy
area
, the
n a
reco
mm
enda
tion
can
be m
ade
for
impr
ovem
ents
/ re
desi
gn fo
r th
at p
artic
ular
are
a. A
lso,
whe
n ev
alua
ting
spec
ific
proj
ects
in th
e 20
20 o
r 20
40 s
cena
rios,
the
sce
nario
can
be
eval
uate
d w
ith a
nd w
ithou
t th
e im
prov
emen
t, to
he
lp g
auge
the
impa
cts
of a
spe
cific
pro
ject
or i
mpr
ovem
ent,
thus
hel
ping
to p
riorit
ize
proj
ects
.
In r
espo
nse
to th
is m
emor
andu
m, i
t is
requ
este
d th
at K
YTC
eith
er a
ppro
ve th
e al
tern
ativ
es o
r pr
ovid
e gu
idan
ce o
n re
visi
ng th
em. I
t is
also
req
uest
ed th
at K
YTC
con
firm
the
proj
ects
that
are
to
be
incl
uded
in th
e al
tern
ativ
es, a
nd p
rovi
de a
ny fe
edba
ck o
n th
e sp
ecifi
cs o
f the
ir de
sign
, or
advi
se if
any
pro
ject
s ar
e m
issi
ng.
1
Walker, Lindsay A.
From: Hickerson, Judi (KYTC-D05) [[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 8:45 AMTo: West, Jonathan (KYTC); Thompson, Travis (KYTC-D05); Richardson, Jason R (KYTC-D05);
Schaefer, Jeff (KYTC-D05); Chaney, Larry D (KIPDA); Rush, Andy (KIPDA)Cc: Walker, Scott; Walker, Lindsay A.; Pelfrey, Mikael (KYTC); Witt, Thomas (KYTC); Hall, Tom
(KYTC-D05); Dikes, Shawn P.Subject: RE: I-265 Programming Study - Freeway AlternativesAttachments: I-265 Alternatives Memorandum - To KYTC - 20140304.docx
Hi All,
I wanted to share the attached memorandum with the subject project team to see if you had any comments.
The only comment I have is I do not see any ITS or “parallel corridor” evaluations in the memo. Originally I believe wehad discussions on including existing and proposed. Maybe those will be evaluated as a subset of the lane additions. Iam working with Jason Richardson on getting plans for the tunnel area but they are not yet available. Jason please addany thoughts.
Thanks.
Judi
Judi Hickerson KYTC D-5 8310 Westport Rd Louisville, KY 40242 502-210-5429 [email protected]
From: Dikes, Shawn P. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 3:51 PM To: Pelfrey, Mikael (KYTC); Hall, Tom (KYTC-D05); Hickerson, Judi (KYTC-D05) Cc: Walker, Scott; Walker, Lindsay A.; Witt, Thomas (KYTC) Subject: RE: I-265 Programming Study - Freeway Alternatives
All See the revised memo. We have indicated that this is indeed referencing the 2012 Six Year Plan projects. We havealso identified the projects of significance by their Six Year Plan # that are relevant to each alternative. The typo aboutKY 305 is fixed. And the reference to Alt. 6 has been corrected as well.
Please let me know if there are any other comments, and if not we can agree on these alternatives and the methodologyand more forward with our analysis.
Thanks
Shawn
From: Pelfrey, Mikael (KYTC) [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:18 AM To: Dikes, Shawn P.; Hall, Tom (KYTC-D05); Hickerson, Judi (KYTC-D05) Cc: Walker, Scott; Walker, Lindsay A.; Witt, Thomas (KYTC) Subject: RE: I-265 Programming Study - Freeway Alternatives
2
Shawn,
Thomas Witt and I reviewed and have some general comments:
1. Include 2012 before the Six Year Plan reference to eliminate confusion as we currently have a 2014recommended plan.
2. Instead of stating blanket statements such as “all projects that are identified to be in place by 2020” or “allprojects in place by 2040” could the projects be listed so we wouldn’t have to reference other documents?
3. The second to last bullet mentions KY 305, but there is not a KY 305 in Louisville. Assume this is a typo.
Thanks.
Mikael Pelfrey, P.E.Transportation Engineering SpecialistKentucky Transportation CabinetDivision of Planning
From: Dikes, Shawn P. [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:36 AM To: Hall, Tom (KYTC-D05); Hickerson, Judi (KYTC-D05); Pelfrey, Mikael (KYTC) Cc: Walker, Scott; Walker, Lindsay A.; Dikes, Shawn P. Subject: I-265 Programming Study - Freeway Alternatives
Judi, Tom and Mikael
Attached is a memorandum that outlines the freeway alternatives that we are proposing to analyze for the I 265Programming Study. We would like to get you and other KYTC staff to provide feedback on these before we begin thein depth analysis.
Feel free to email or call to discuss this document.
Thanks
Shawn
3
______________________________________________________________________NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may contain confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration, dissemination or distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or you are not an authorized recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies.
______________________________________________________________________NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may contain confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration, dissemination or distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or you are not an authorized recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies.