appendix a tree report - la city planning · avenue d ninth street eighth street seventh street...

APPENDIX A

Tree Report

TREE INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT

for

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

Prepared for:

Meridian Consultants, LLC

910 Hampshire Road, Suite V

Westlake Village, California 91361

Contact: Bruce Lackow

Prepared by:

31878 Camino Capistrano #200

San Juan Capistrano, California 92675

Contact: Christopher Kallstrand, ISA Certified Arborist WE-8208A

949.482.5115

NOVEMBER 16, 2015

Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material.

Tree Inventory and Assessment for Fox Studios

9275 i November 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page No.

1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1

2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ..............................................................3

2.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................. 32.2 Project Characteristics ............................................................................................ 3

3 METHODS .........................................................................................................................9

3.1 Scope of Work Limitations ................................................................................... 10

4 RESULTS .........................................................................................................................11

4.1 Protected Tree Summary ....................................................................................... 114.2 Ornamental Tree Summary ................................................................................... 114.3 Mapping ................................................................................................................ 144.4 Tree Removal/Encroachment ................................................................................ 144.5 Candidates Suitable for Preservation and Relocation ........................................... 164.6 Mapping ................................................................................................................ 16

5 MITIGATION ..................................................................................................................17

5.1 Mitigation Plan...................................................................................................... 17

6 TREE PROTECTION .....................................................................................................19

7 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................21

8 ARBORIST’S DISCLOSURE ........................................................................................23

APPENDICES

A Tree Information MatrixB Tree Location ExhibitC Tree Disposition ExhibitD Tree Protection Measures

FIGURES

1 Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................................52A Development Areas ..............................................................................................................7


TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

Page No.

9275 ii November 2015

TABLES

1 Summary of Ornamental Tree Species ..............................................................................122 Summary of Potential Tree Removals ...............................................................................153 Tree Removal by Individual Project Area..........................................................................16


9275 1 November 2015

1 INTRODUCTION

A tree inventory and assessment of the proposed 21st Century Fox Studios Master Plan (FSMP) project site was performed pursuant to City of Los Angeles (City) Ordinance No. 177404, to ensure the protection of, and to further regulate the removal of protected trees. The Protected Tree Ordinance defines a protected tree as any of the following Southern California native species, which measure 4 inches or more in cumulative diameter, 4.5 feet above the ground level at the base of the tree:

Oak tree including valley oak (Quercus lobata) and coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia),or any other tree of the oak genus indigenous to California but excluding the scrub oak(Quercus dumosa)

Southern California black walnut (Juglans californica var. californica)

California sycamore (Platanus racemosa)

California bay (Umbellularia californica)

Dudek was retained by Meridian Consultants to conduct a tree inventory and assessment of the FSMP project site. Dudek’s Urban and Community Forestry Division’s International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) certified arborists, working under the supervision of a California licensed Pest Control Advisor who is an ISA certified arborist, performed various functions associated with surveying, inventorying, and evaluating the condition of selected trees on the FSMP project site, as described in the following sections.

The purpose of this report is to present the physical characteristics, mapped locations, and disposition of the trees.



INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK



2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION

The FSMP project site is generally bounded by Avenue of the Stars on the northeast, West Pico Boulevard to the southeast, private development to the southwest, and West Olympic Boulevard to the northwest (Figure 1)1. This tree assessment addresses the FSMP project site, where development activity is proposed.

2.1 Existing Conditions

Existing land uses at the project site have been classified into the following five categories: (1) Creative Office, (2) Specialty Space, (3) Stages, (4) Facility Support, and (5) Utility Support. In 2015, on-site development totaled 1,798,504 square feet. The FSMP project site currently includes trees and shrubs associated with urban landscaping. Trees and shrubs are located in selected groupings and/or are dispersed throughout the property.

2.2 Project Characteristics

The Fox Studios Master Plan has been developed to accommodate Fox’s forecasted increases in on-site employment. Based on the continuation of the annual growth rate in employment that has occurred on the Project Site over the last 20 years, Fox anticipates to increase on-site employment from a current level of 3,920 jobs on an average production day to a total of up to 7,010 jobs at buildout of the Project, an increase of up to 3,090 jobs on an average production day. During peak production periods, daily employment levels are forecasted to increase from a current level of 4,540 jobs to 8,120 jobs at Project buildout, an increase of up to 3,580 jobs during peak production periods. To accommodate this employment growth, Fox is proposing to amend the Century City South Specific Plan in order to permit approximately 1.1 million square feet of net new development within the project site. In addition, it is anticipated that up to a total of approximately 353,400 square feet of existing buildings would be demolished.

Total on-site building area at buildout of the Project would therefore total 2,897,804 square feet. The Applicant has identified six Development Areas within the project site. Five of the development areas are targeted for a mix of new creative office space, specialty space, stage space, facility support space, and utility support space. The sixth area would be developed with only parking uses. The Project would include proposed Height Zones and minimum building setbacks. The Project also includes improvements with regard to vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian access; parking; streetscape/landscaping; signage; and lighting.

1 Six separate areas comprise the project site. These areas are respectively referred to as Areas A, B, C, D, E, and F. Area A is located along Avenue of the Stars; Area B is located on site southwest of the InterContinental Hotel; Area C is centrally located in the Studio; Area D is located along West Olympic Boulevard; Area E is located along West Pico Boulevard; and Area F is located north of Pico West Parking Structure (Figure 2A).



This tree report addresses protected trees on the FSMP project site with the assumption that while trees will be preserved in place where practical, in order to provide a conservative analysis it is assumed that all trees within the six development areas will be removed.

Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed

FIGURE 1Vicinity Map

9275Tree Inventory and Assessment for 21st Century Fox Studios2015

SOURCE: USGS 7.5-Minute Series Quadrangle.

Z:\Tem

plates

\Arcm

ap\Cu

rrent\V

icinity\

8x11_V

icinty_

Portra

it.mxd

0 2,0001,000Feet

Project Site

n

Avenue D

Four

th S

tree

t

Third

Str

eet

Fift

h St

reet

Sixt

h St

reet

Seve

nth

Stre

et

Eigh

th S

tree

t

Nin

th S

tree

t

Seco

nd S

tree

t

Firs

t Str

eet

Avenue E

Avenue G

Avenue A

Avenue of the Palms

Avenue B

Avenue F

Mulberry Stre

et

Egress Only

Ingress Only

Galaxy Way Parking Structure

Stage 10 Stage 11 Stage 14

Stage 15

Stage 16

Fox Plaza Parking Structure

(Not a Part)

Pico WestParking Structure

Stage 8 Stage 6

Stage 5

Stage 9

Stage 20

Stage 21Stage 22

Fox Plaza(Not a Part)

Avenue C

Stag

e 17

Stag

e 18

Stag

e 19

New Executive Building100

Executive Building 88

Fox NetworkCenter

101InterContinental(Not a Part)

Crafts Building99

29

William Fox Building89

103

310

41

1

86

58

16 | 17

59

104

102

78

42

44

203

80 7950

43

69

307

666

663

662

38

105

54

795

216

217

218

49

2 3 4 5 | 6 52

214

23

555345

18 19 31

Zanu

ck T

heat

er22

657

2221

222

Parking (Below)

Parking (Below)

32

95St

age

4St

age

3St

age

2St

age

1

26

12

748

205

221

24

71 73

7576

147 DWP Substation

Pump

790

764

8 D

WP

Subs

tatio

n

51

Hillcrest Country Club(Not a Part)

Cheviot Hills Park(Not a Part)Century Woods

(Not a Part)

Satellite Facility

Avenue of the Stars

Wes

t Pic

o Bl

vd.

West Olym

pic Blvd. Motor Avenue

Century Park West

Area B

Area A

Area C

Are

a D

Area E

Area FParking Only

Legend

Existing Buildings

Pedestrian Paths/ PlazaVehicular/Paved Area

Open Space

Project Site

Below Grade Parking

Gat

e 1

Gate 3

Gat

e 4

Gate 5

Gate 6

Gat

e 7

Gate 3

Gate 8

Gate 2

0' 200'100'

N Scale 1” = 200’-0”

Fig. 2A Development Areas 3Fox Studios Master Plan Master Plan Progress November 6, 2015



3 METHODS

Dudek mapped tree locations using a Trimble Pathfinder Pro XH Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. The Pathfinder has a horizontal accuracy of 1-meter (1-sigma) using differential code positioning techniques. Since tree canopies can sometimes cause loss of satellite lock by blocking the line-of-sight to satellites, an electronic compass and reflectorless electronic distance measuring (EDM) device was also used in mapping tree locations. The EDM/compass combination operates in concert with the Pathfinder system to position offsets, and offset information is automatically attached to the GPS position data string. The electronic tree locations were then evaluated using ArcView 10.4 software to determine the position of the trees related to the project site.

The trees throughout Fox Studios and within the proposed FSMP development site were tagged on the trunk with an aluminum tag bearing a unique identification number, and these numbers correspond to the tree locations presented in the tree data matrix in Appendix A and Tree Location Exhibit in Appendix B. Tree diameter was measured using a diameter tape providing adjusted figures2 for diameter measurements when wrapping the tape around an object’s circumference. Diameter measurements were taken using protocol provided by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers in the “Guide for Plant Appraisal,” published by the ISA (Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers 2000). The DBH of each tree measurement was taken at a circumference at 4.5 feet above the ground along the trunk axis, with common exceptions. In cases where a tree’s trunk was located on a slope, the 4.5-foot distance was approximated as the average of the shortest and longest sides of the trunk (i.e., the uphill side and downhill side of a tree’s trunk, respectively) and the measurement was made at the circumference of the trunk at this point. Tree height was visually estimated. Tree canopy diameters were typically estimated by “pacing-off” the measurement based on the investigator’s knowledge of his stride length or by visually estimating the canopy width. The diameter measurements were always made along an imaginary line intersecting the tree trunk that best approximated the average canopy diameter.

Pursuant to the “Guide for Plant Appraisal,” tree health and structure was evaluated with respect to five distinct tree components: roots, trunk, scaffold branches, small branches, and foliage. Each component of the tree was assessed with regard to health factors such as insect, fungal, or pathogen damage; mechanical damage; presence of decay; presence of wilted or dead leaves; and wound closure. Components were graded as good, fair, poor, and dead, with ‘good’ representing no apparent problems, and ‘dead’ representing a dying and/or dead tree.

Trees for relocation were noted where tree and site conditions were favorable. Healthy trees with a DBH of less than 12 inches, located on level terrain, were considered as prime relocation candidates.

2 Inches divided by 3.14 () provide diameter measurement in inches.


9275 10 November 2015

3.1 Scope of Work Limitations

No root crown excavations or investigations, or internal probing were performed during the tree assessments. Therefore, the presence or absence of internal decay or other hidden inferiorities in individual trees could not be confirmed. It is recommended that any large tree proposed for preservation or relocation in an urban setting be thoroughly inspected for internal, or subterranean, decay by a qualified arborist before finalizing preservation or relocation plans.


9275 11 November 2015

4 RESULTS

4.1 Protected Tree Summary

There are 24 protected trees located throughout and immediately adjacent to 21st Century Fox Studios. In total, six of these are located within the proposed FSMP project area. The 24 protected trees include 21 California sycamores and 3 coast live oaks. There were no additional native oak species, Southern California black walnuts, or California bay trees of jurisdictional size located on the FSMP Project Site.

The 24 trees are dispersed throughout the property and are primarily planted in planter cut outs and planting strips. The trees are primarily single stemmed and have tree diameters at 4.5 feet DBH that varied from tree to tree and range from 4 to 33 inches. Average tree heights and canopy widths range from 35 to 70 feet tall and extend 10 to 55 feet at their widest points.

The trees share similar health and structural ratings, the majority of which are in “fair” health and “fair” structure. A total of 58.3% exhibit fair health, and 41.6% exhibit good health. None of the protected trees were found to be dead. Structurally, 58.3% of the trees are considered in fair structural condition, and 41.6% are considered in good structural condition. Good condition trees exhibit acceptable vigor, healthy foliage, adequate structure, and lack of any major maladies. Fair condition trees are typical, with few maladies, but declining vigor.

To accommodate the proposed site development, 6 of the 24 protected trees will potentially require removal. All six of the trees potentially requiring removal are California sycamores. A full account of the physical characteristics and disposition of all protected trees on the FSMP Project Site is available in the tree data matrix (Appendix A).

4.2 Ornamental Tree Summary

There are 942 ornamental trees dispersed throughout the project site. In total 415 are located within the FSMP project site. The 942 ornamental trees are represented by 63 individual tree species. As depicted in Table 1, palm trees are the most dominant tree type on the Project Site, with 240 trees representing 25.5% of the site’s ornamental trees. The majority of the palms are Mexican fan palms (Washingtonia robusta) and pygmy date palms (Phoenix roebelenii), with 148 and 73 individual trees respectively. Indian laurel fig (Ficus microcarpa nitida), Afghan pine (Pinus elderica), and Canary Island pine (Pinus canariensis) are the next highest occurring species at the Project Site, with 100, 84, and 75 individual trees, respectively. Species tree totals decline for the remaining species with fern pine (Podocarpus gracilior), weeping fig (Ficus benjamina), and Italian cypress (Cupressus sempervirens) present at the next highest levels with 56, 53, and 51 individual trees, respectively. The remaining trees are at lower levels, but combine to represent 32.1% of the tree population.


9275 12 November 2015

Table 1

Summary of Ornamental Tree Species

Tree Species

Scientific Name Common Name Number of Trees Percentage

Acer palmatum Japanese maple 1 0.11%

Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 9 0.96%

Archontophoenix

cunninghamiana

King palm 6 0.64%

Brachychiton acerifolius Flame tree 2 0.21%

Callistemon pallidus Lemon bottlebrush 5 0.53%

Callistemon viminalis Weeping bottlebrush 2 0.21%

Camellia sinensis Camellia 1 0.11%

Cedrus atlantica Atlas Cedar 2 0.21%

Ceiba speciosa Silk floss tree 2 0.21%

Cercis occidentalis Western redbud 1 0.11%

Corymbia citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 0.11%

Cupressus sempervirens Italian cypress 51 5.41%

Eriobotrya japonica Loquat 1 0.11%

Erythrina caffra Coral tree 39 4.14%

Eucalyptus camaldulensis Red gum 1 0.11%

Eucalyptus cinerea Argyle apple 1 0.11%

Eucalyptus ficifolia Red flowering gum 1 0.11%

Eucalyptus globulus Blue gum 6 0.64%

Eucalyptus nicholii Peppermint gum 1 0.11%

Eucalyptus ovata Swamp gum 2 0.21%

Eugenia spp. Eugenia 1 0.11%

Feijoa sellowiana Pineapple guava 1 0.11%

Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 53 5.63%

Ficus macrophylla Moreton bay fig 1 0.11%

Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian-laurel fig 100 10.62%

Ficus rubiginosa Rusty-leaf fig 1 0.11%

Geijera parviflora Australian willow 5 0.53%

Ginkgo biloba Ginko 9 0.96%

Hibiscus syriacus Rose-of-Sharon 1 0.11%

Ilex opaca Holly 3 0.32%

Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda 8 0.85%

Juniperus chinensis

'Torulosa'

Hollywood juniper 31 3.29%

Juniperus occidentalis Western cedar 1 0.11%

Kigelia pinnata Sausage tree 2 0.21%

Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 28 2.97%

Lagerstroemia indica Crape myrtle 21 2.23%


9275 13 November 2015

Table 1

Summary of Ornamental Tree Species

Tree Species

Scientific Name Common Name Number of Trees Percentage

Ligustrum lucidum Privet 16 1.70%

Liquidambar styraciflua Sweetgum 1 0.11%

Liquidambar styraciflua

'Rotundiloba'

Sweetgum “Rotundiloba” 2 0.21%

Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip tree 3 0.32%

Lophostemon confertus Brisbane box 2 0.21%

Magnolia grandiflora Southern magnolia 1 0.11%

Melaleuca quinquenervia Broad-leaved paperbark 22 2.34%

Olea europaea Common olive 2 0.21%

Persea americana Avocado 4 0.42%

Phoenix dactylifera Date palm 9 0.96%

Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 73 7.75%

Pinus canariensis Canary Island pine 75 7.96%

Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 84 8.92%

Pittosporum tobira Japanese pittosporum 2 0.21%

Podocarpus gracilior Fern pine 56 5.94%

Populus nigra Italica Lombardy poplar 7 0.74%

Prunus spp. Cherry spp. 2 0.21%

Pyrus calleryana Callery pear 16 1.70%

Schefflera actinophylla Umbrella tree 2 0.21%

Schinus molle Peruvian pepper 1 0.11%

Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper 1 0.11%

Syagrus romanzoffiana Queen palm 4 0.42%

Syzygium paniculatum Brush cherry 1 0.11%

Thuja spp. Cedar 2 0.21%

Ulmus parvifolia Chinese elm 4 0.42%

Unknown spp. Unknown 1 0.11%

Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 148 15.71%

Total 942 100%

The trees range from single- to multi-stemmed and have tree diameters that varied from tree to tree and range from 1 to 48 inches. Of the 942 ornamental trees, 427 have stem diameters greater than 12 inches. Average tree heights and canopy widths range from 2 to 85 feet tall and extend 1 to 70 feet at their widest points. The tallest trees consist primarily of Mexican fan palms, Afghan pines, Indian laurel figs, and Canary Island pines. The larger tree species, including the Afghan pine, Canary Island pine, fern pine, and Indian laurel figs dominate the larger canopy spread categories. Appendix A provides tree height attribute information for each tree on the project site.


9275 14 November 2015

The trees share similar health and structural ratings, the majority of which are in “good” health and “fair” structure. As presented in Appendix A, over half of the trees, a total of 62.9%, exhibit good health. With the exception of two dead trees, the remaining trees are classified as in fair (35.2%) and poor (1.6%) condition. Structurally, 83.2% of the trees are considered in fair condition, 14% in good condition, 2.4% in poor condition, and 0.1% in very poor condition. Good condition trees exhibit acceptable vigor, healthy foliage, adequate structure, and lack of any major maladies. Fair condition trees are typical, with few maladies, but declining vigor. Poor condition trees exhibit declining vigor, unhealthy foliage, poor branch structure , or excessive lean. The most commonly observed maladies include pruning wounds, constrained growing spaces, and tree crown restrictions from nearby buildings.

4.3 Mapping

The location of each tree identified in the FSMP project site is depicted in Appendix B.

4.4 Tree Removal/Encroachment

The analysis of affected trees presented below is based on the proposed project footprint. For the purposes of this report, tree removal is conservatively considered necessary when the trunk is located inside or within 2 feet of the proposed limits of each of the six Development Areas. Encroachment is expected when soil and roots are disturbed within the tree protected zone (canopy drip line plus 5 feet or 15 feet from trunk, whichever is greater). Typically, specific circumstances allow some Protected Trees that are being encroached upon to be preserved in place within or adjacent to the Development Area. These trees have been identified during the site planning stage and have been included in this report. Table 2 summarizes the total number of Protected and Ornamental Trees by species, which have potential to be subject to direct construction-related impacts.

In total, 423 trees may require removal based on the disturbance analysis conducted for this report. It is estimated that 6 out of 24 protected trees and 417 out of the 942 ornamental trees may need to be removed. As seen in Table 2, 208 of the 416 ornamental trees that may require removal are over 12 inches DBH. In total, 103 of 208 ornamental trees that may require removal (over 12 inches DBH) are multi-stemmed trees with average individual stem diameters of approximately 9 inches. Table 3 provides a breakdown of potential individual tree removal totals by project area. Individual tree dispositions and locations are provided in Appendix A and Appendix C respectively.


9275 15 November 2015

Table 2

Summary of Potential Tree Removals

Potential Tree Removals

Scientific Name Common Name Number of Trees Total Number of Trees over 12 inches DBH

Acer palmatum Japanese maple 1 0

Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 1 0

Callistemon viminalis Weeping bottlebrush 1 0

Cupressus sempervirens Italian cypress 38 0

Eriobotrya japonica Loquat 1 0

Erythrina caffra Coral tree 32 29

Eucalyptus camaldulensis Red gum 1 0

Eucalyptus cinerea Argyle apple 1 1

Eucalyptus ficifolia Red flowering gum 1 1

Eucalyptus globulus Blue gum 3 3

Eucalyptus ovata Swamp gum 2 2

Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 10 3

Ficus macrophylla Moreton Bay fig 1 1

Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian Laurel fig 70 50

Geijera parviflora Australian willow 5 0

Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda 1 1

Juniperus chinensis

'Torulosa'

Hollywood juniper 4 0

Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 4 0

Lagerstroemia indica Crape myrtl 5 1

Ligustrum lucidum Privet 1 0

Lophostemon confertus Brisbane box 1 0

Melaleuca quinquenervia Broad-leaved paperbark 22 21

Phoenix dactylifera Date palm 5 5

Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 28 4

Pinus canariensis Canary Island pine 26 10

Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 77 18

Platanus racemosa California sycamore 6* 4*

Podocarpus gracilior Fern pine 1 1

Prunus spp. Cherry species 2 0

Pyrus calleryana Callery pear 13 0

Syagrus romanzoffiana Queen palm 4 4

Thuja spp. Cedar species 2 2

Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 53 50

Total 423 212


9275 16 November 2015

Table 3

Tree Removal by Individual Project Area

Removals

Area Total Over 12-inches

A 132 (5*) 47 (3*)

B 83 (1*) 54 (1*)

C 49 25

D 102 34

E 39 39

Future Parking 18 13

Total 423 212

* Protected Tree

4.5 Candidates Suitable for Preservation and Relocation

In addition to the general site tree evaluations, Dudek evaluated all of the potentially disturbed protected trees for their potential for preservation in place or relocation. Trees identified as candidates for preservation in place and relocation typically exhibit good health (new growth and vigor) and structure (trunk/branching); have no uncorrectable, outwardly detectable defects; and show no signs or symptoms of serious pest infestation or species-specific pathogens. In order for the trees to avoid incidental damage during construction or relocation, preservation and protection measures must be provided before, during, and following the construction phase. Measures that are recommended for implementation during these phases are provided in Appendix C.

In total, 543 trees will be preserved and protected in place throughout the studio. The 543 protected/retained trees include 18 protected trees and 525 ornamental trees. Of these, 9 trees (all ornamental) have canopies within 15 feet of the construction limits and are recommended for tree protection. None of the protected trees outside of the FSMP are within 15 feet of construction limits. As such, the 18 remaining protected trees do not require tree protection measures. Furthermore, none of the protected trees located on the project site are considered suitable candidates for relocation. Individual tree dispositions and locations are provided in Appendix A, and C respectively.

4.6 Mapping

The location of each tree identified in the FSMP project site is depicted in Appendix B.


9275 17 November 2015

5 MITIGATION

The proposed project’s mitigation effort will include avoidance, minimization of, and mitigation for proposed impacts to trees, which shall be consistent with the goals and intent of the Protected Tree Ordinance.

5.1 Mitigation Plan

Mitigation will be required for potential impacts associated with the FSMP project affecting up to six California sycamores. This tee report addresses tree mitigation plantings to address such impacts and satisfies the requirements of the City of Los Angeles. It is assumed that the mitigation outlined herein is applicable to the impacts presented by the currently proposed project, and where it is possible to reduce tree impacts through planning and other efforts identified at later stages of project development, mitigation measures will be reduced proportionally.

The City’s ordinance regarding the “Protected Tree Relocation and Replacement” requires that a permittee replace a protected tree approved for removal or relocation “within the property by at least two trees of a protected variety.” Section 46.02(c)1 further states “each replacement tree shall be at least a 15-gallon, or larger, specimen in size, measuring one inch or more in diameter one foot above the base, and be not less than seven feet in height measured from the base. The size and number of replacement trees shall approximate the value of the tree to be replaced.”

Based on impacts to six California sycamores within the FSMP project site, a minimum of 12 15-gallon size California sycamores are required according to City Ordinance No. 177404.

Dudek recommends all tree plantings be subject to a 5-year monitoring effort by independent 3rd party, certified arborist. This monitoring effort would consider growth, health, and condition of the subject trees in order to evaluate the project’s success. The monitoring effort may result in a recommendation of remedial actions should any of the tree plantings exhibit poor or declining health. In an effort to maintain minimum mitigation tree quantities follow the 5-year monitoring period, Dudek recommends over-planting mitigation trees by 50%, resulting in a mitigation planting of 18 15-gallon size California sycamores.

The specific location of individual mitigation tree plantings on site shall be addressed in the mitigation planting plan or landscape design plan prepared for the site. Dudek estimates that all of the required mitigation trees can be accommodated within the proposed project landscape areas. The mitigation requirement and the approved tree replacement mitigation ratio is at the discretion of the City and subject to final tree impact analysis. As such, the final tree numbers associated with tree replacement and other mitigation components may vary from that presented in this Tree Inventory and Assessment.


9275 18 November 2015



9275 19 November 2015

6 TREE PROTECTION

In total, nine ornamental trees adjacent to the FSMP project site are recommended for preservation through the implementation of Tree Protection Measures. However, based on the City’s requirements, these trees do not require preservation. Should preservation be selected, Dudek recommends that the nine trees be protected according the Tree Protection Measures in Appendix D.


9275 20 November 2015



9275 21 November 2015

7 CONCLUSION

The project site includes 24 trees meeting the City’s Protected Tree Ordinance definition of a protected tree. Up to six protected trees, all California sycamore, and 417 ornamental trees (208 over 12 inches DBH) may be removed due to Project development. The City of Los Angeles requires that the six protected trees, if removed, be replaced at a minimum ratio of 2:1 with 15-gallon trees of like species. The City does not require the replacement of the remaining 417 ornamental trees requiring removal to accommodate the project. Actual tree impact or encroachment numbers may be lower than anticipated and presented in this report once grading plans are staked in the field and are being implemented. Any adjustments to the number of impacted trees will be documented by the project’s arborist.


9275 22 November 2015



9275 23 November 2015

8 ARBORIST’S DISCLOSURE

This report provides conclusions and recommendations based on a visual examination of the trees and surrounding site by an ISA Certified Arborist. Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees.

Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that may fail in ways not fully understood. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. This evaluation did not include subterranean, aerial, or internal examination. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specific period of time. There are no guarantees that a tree’s condition will not change over a short or long period due to climatic, cultural or environmental conditions. Trees provide many benefits to those who live near them. They also include inherent risks that can be minimized, but not eliminated.


9275 24 November 2015


APPENDIX A

Tree Information Matrix

D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9

1 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 6 24.95997 6 7 12 15 12 5 30 25 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area F 6436469.643 1840719.33

2 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 7 24 12 11 10 8 7 7 7 30 25 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area F 6436463.087 1840728.341

3 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 7 23.34524 11 10 9 9 8 7 7 30 25 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area F 6436455.463 1840739.289




7 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 7 27.98214 12 12 12 11 10 7 9 30 25 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area F 6436428.204 1840779.88


9 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 1 7 7 15 4 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area F 6436406.542 1840793.71




13 Olea europaea Common olive 13 7.416198 3 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 18 10 Good Fair No No Tree Protection 6436396.819 1840830.756

14 Olea europaea Common olive 6 10.0995 6 4 4 4 3 3 18 16 Good Fair No No Tree Protection 6436407.341 1840839.455

15 Brachychiton acerifolius Flame tree 2 17.20465 14 10 35 25 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436376.173 1840831.478

16 Brachychiton acerifolius Flame tree 1 19 19 45 25 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436369.078 1840840.348

17 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 5 19.07878 11 9 8 7 7 30 25 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436372.701 1840874.61

18 Podocarpus gracilior Fern pine 1 6 6 30 15 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436333.447 1840896.574

19 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 4 8.660254 5 5 4 3 20 12 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436288.197 1840968.26



22 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 2 13.34166 13 3 35 25 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436278.191 1840980.743

23 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 2 7.211103 6 4 25 10 Good Poor No No Preservation 6436276.373 1840985.771

24 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 2 6.403124 5 4 20 8 Good Poor No No Preservation 6436274.377 1840989.83

25 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 1 10 10 30 20 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436271.455 1840993.329


27 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 3 10.48809 7 6 5 20 20 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436273.753 1841007.236

28 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 1 6 6 7 4 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436241.023 1841009.967

29 Podocarpus gracilior Fern pine 1 1 1 7 3 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436250.273 1841037.832



32 Syzygium paniculatum Eugenia 2 8.602325 5 7 40 25 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436217.205 1841047.374

33 Ulmus parvifolia Chinese elm 3 6.557439 5 3 3 30 25 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436207.113 1841074.157

34 Eucalyptus globulus Blue gum 1 27 27 45 40 Fair Poor Yes No Preservation 6436190.748 1841084.91



37 Ligustrum lucidum Broad-leaf privet 1 9 9 16 8 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436203.725 1841090.67






X -Coordinate Y - CoordinateIndividual Stem Diameter (in.)

Appendix A - Tree Information Matrix

Canopy

(ft.)Health Structure

Over 12-in

stem DBHProtected Removal Disposition by Area

Tree

No.Botanical Name Common Name Stems

Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)

1

D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9X -Coordinate Y - Coordinate

Individual Stem Diameter (in.)


Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)




46 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 3 21.9545 13 13 12 40 40 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436137.351 1841154.395

47 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 1 14 14 40 20 Good Poor Yes No Preservation 6436144.624 1841151.434

48 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 1 15 15 40 35 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436147.821 1841162.493

49 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 2 19.20937 12 15 40 35 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436143.365 1841173.022

50 Schefflera actinophylla Queensland umbrella tree 1 29 29 70 65 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436135.562 1841170.063










60 Cupressus sempervirens Italian cypress 1 1 1 15 6 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436113.155 1841190.919

61 Cupressus sempervirens Italian cypress 1 3 3 15 6 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436111.993 1841200.363

62 Ligustrum lucidum Broad-leaf privet 2 9.433981 8 5 35 20 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436109.462 1841205.033

63 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 5 24.61707 19 8 6 9 8 30 35 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436128.519 1841217.268

64 Callistemon pallidus Lemon bottlebrush 3 6.557439 5 3 3 25 15 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436145.843 1841232.624

65 Callistemon pallidus Lemon bottlebrush 1 7 7 18 12 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436169.558 1841248.022

66 Callistemon pallidus Lemon bottlebrush 1 12 12 30 2 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436201.457 1841238.986

67 Callistemon pallidus Lemon bottlebrush 1 7 7 18 10 Good Poor No No Preservation 6436221.898 1841209.318

68 Callistemon pallidus Lemon bottlebrush 2 12.80625 10 8 28 15 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436238.084 1841184.748

69 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 1 10 10 9 8 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436262.318 1841117.285


71 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 2 4.242641 3 3 4 5 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436260.958 1841101.41

72 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 1 3 3 4 5 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436253.656 1841101.637

73 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 2 9.219544 7 6 30 20 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436255.379 1841096.261


75 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 6 6 3 2 2 1 3 3 25 12 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436254.345 1841081.085

76 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 26 26 85 70 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436272.143 1841054.015






82 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 3 10.48809 7 5 6 25 28 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436293.572 1841087.921

83 Pittosporum tobira Japanese pittosporum 2 22.67157 17 15 35 30 Good Poor Yes No Preservation 6436283.487 1841104.512

84 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 1 5 5 4 8 Good Good No No Preservation 6436346.132 1841062.973

2




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)



87 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 3 43.28972 4 43 3 3 6 Good Good Yes No Preservation 6436350.682 1841057.801



90 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 2 4.242641 3 3 4 6 Good Good No No Preservation 6436351.729 1841051.925





95 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 3 6.557439 5 3 3 5 8 Good Good No No Preservation 6436361.94 1841039.145

96 Podocarpus gracilior Fern pine 1 33.13608 33 3 55 50 Poor Fair Yes No Preservation 6436343.93 1841023.238


98 Podocarpus gracilior Fern pine 1 29 29 65 45 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436332.78 1841015.89


100 Podocarpus gracilior Fern pine 1 37 37 75 50 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436349.691 1840956.927

101 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 1 12 12 18 15 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436356.811 1840941.522

102 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 25 25 45 45 Good Fair Yes Yes Preservation 6436392.339 1840936.592

103 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 2 33.24154 23 24 45 45 Good Fair Yes Yes Preservation 6436414.923 1840956.271

104 Cercis occidentalis Western redbud 2 4.242641 3 3 17 16 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436426.06 1840973.42

105 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 3 6.164414 5 3 2 6 8 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436413.623 1840995.947



108 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 3 11.53256 9 6 4 25 20 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436439.638 1840990.037

109 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 1 14 14 25 20 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436453.488 1840999.273

110 Ginkgo biloba Ginko 1 2 2 12 5 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436491.876 1840983.36

111 Ginkgo biloba Ginko 1 1 1 8 5 Good Poor No No Preservation 6436480.775 1840994.598


113 Pittosporum tobira Japanese pittosporum 2 10.81665 9 6 22 20 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436461.814 1841025.641








121 Camellia sinensis Camellia 2 1.414214 1 1 10 8 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436419.892 1841038.537






3




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)










136 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 2 13.34166 13 3 30 25 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436526.898 1840928.332


138 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 15 15 55 25 Good Fair Yes No Tree Protection 6436498.4 1840915.631



141 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 15 15 70 35 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area F 6436486.165 1840885.629

142 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 2 13.34166 13 3 35 25 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area F 6436474.161 1840847.971

143 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 3 17.14643 13 5 10 35 25 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area F 6436467.586 1840843.386

144 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 1 13 13 35 25 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area F 6436459.465 1840837.461

145 Eucalyptus cinerea Argyle apple 1 25 25 70 30 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area F 6436449.395 1840848.868

146 Acer palmatum Japanese maple 3 1.732051 1 1 1 12 8 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area F 6436444.187 1840862.93

147 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 3 14.59452 14 4 1 25 20 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436398.366 1840889.882

148 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 1 34 34 60 50 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436453.025 1840915.318

149 Lagerstroemia indica Crape myrtle 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 16 12 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436363.856 1841123.239

150 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 6 6 0 0 0 0 5 5 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436350.786 1841118.251

151 Unknown spp. Unknown spp. 2 17.69181 12 13 0 0 0 28 25 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436343.268 1841128.24

152 Podocarpus gracilior Fern pine 1 32 32 0 0 0 65 40 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436334.169 1841145.991

153 Ilex opaca Holly 5 4 3 2 1 1 1 12 10 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436338.102 1841154.776







160 Schinus terbinthifolius Schinus terbinthifolius 2 23.34524 17 16 24 35 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436419.337 1841206.414

161 Ceiba speciosa Silk floss tree 1 17 17 22 30 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436438.05 1841180.267

162 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 5 10.95445 5 6 5 4 3 3 25 24 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436427.574 1841167.174

163 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 34 85 50 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436403.547 1841146.253

164 Quercus agriolia Coast live oak 1 5 20 10 Good Fair No Yes Preservation 6436360.861 1841258.015





4




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)

169 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 5 3.316625 2 1 1 2 1 18 6 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436278.044 1841230.344

170 Feijoa sellowiana Pineapple guave 5 5.196152 3 2 3 2 1 18 6 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436299.499 1841236.781

171 Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip tree 1 5 5 18 16 Dead Dead No No Preservation 6436309.273 1841242.724

172 Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip tree 1 5 5 18 14 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436330.764 1841259.333

173 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 1 5 5 14 6 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436333.946 1841272.409



176 Magnolia grandiflora Southern magnolia 1 3 3 15 12 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436336.084 1841329.65

177 Ilex opaca Holly 1 5 5 14 10 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436336.688 1841311.021

178 Ilex opaca Holly 1 3 3 14 10 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436326.826 1841316.211


180 Ulmus parvifolia Chinese elm 1 17 17 50 50 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436260.66 1841276.627




184 Persea americana Avocado 2 12.20656 10 7 24 24 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6435940.896 1841451.59

185 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 1 3 3 20 6 Good Fair No No Preservation 6435880.135 1841546.267

186 Corymbia citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 7 7 40 25 Good Fair No No Preservation 6435870.057 1841536.323

187 Eucalyptus nicholii Peppermint gum 1 15 15 45 25 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6435863.167 1841561.964

188 Schinus molle Peruvian pepper 1 3 3 20 12 Good Fair No No Preservation 6435887.617 1841554.354


190 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 1 1 1 14 6 Good Fair No No Preservation 6435912.907 1841579.738




194 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 2 13.45362 10 9 25 16 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6435981.036 1841524.511

195 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 2 10 8 6 25 16 Good Fair No No Preservation 6435994.849 1841505.114

196 Schefflera actinophylla Queensland umbrella tree 2 8.944272 8 4 16 12 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436021.202 1841470.972

197 Persea americana Avocado 2 2.828427 2 2 11 3 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436037.901 1841450.747

198 Persea americana Avocado 1 8 8 38 12 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436058.206 1841416.829

199 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 3 1.414214 1 1 12 3 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436086.158 1841386.548


201 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 1 2 2 8 3 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436111.054 1841348.456

202 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 2 2.236068 2 1 10 4 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436129.9 1841322.033



205 Lophostemon confertus Brisbane box 1 3 3 16 8 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436131.599 1841281.037

206 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 5 4.690416 3 2 2 1 2 14 9 Good Fair No No Preservation 6435870.215 1841678.682

207 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 15 15 35 10 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6435826.992 1841615.278




5




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)







217 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 2 5 4 3 6 8 Good Fair No No Preservation 6435769.999 1841784.469


219 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 4 7.348469 4 5 3 2 6 8 Good Fair No No Preservation 6435761.569 1841797.119


221 Archontophoenix cunninghamiana King palm 1 12 12 20 15 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6435756.134 1841804.184



224 Prunus spp. Prunus spp. 2 1.414214 1 1 8 4 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area D 6435744.418 1841870.497

225 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 8 4.123106 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 13 8 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area D 6435719.976 1841847.69

226 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 4 7.348469 6 3 2 2 1 10 8 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area D 6435715.327 1841860.555

227 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 15 15 12 14 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area D 6436176.27 1842147.103



230 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 8 8 6 8 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area D 6436020.341 1842034.405






236 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 2 13.45362 10 9 26 14 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6435830.347 1841830.681

237 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 4 28.5482 13 14 15 15 60 25 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6435916.864 1841721.17

238 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 2 20 16 12 60 18 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6435920.636 1841721.923

239 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 4 25.37716 16 12 10 12 60 18 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6435924.335 1841726.918


241 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 5 15.16575 9 8 7 6 30 28 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6435957.419 1841752.665


243 Ficus rubiginosa Rusty-leaf fig 1 15 15 35 35 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436286.751 1841977.152




247 Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip tree 1 11 11 40 20 Dead Dead No No Preservation 6436324.157 1841842.195





252 Cedrus atlantica Atlas cedar 1 25 25 38 40 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436218.058 1841773.123

6




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)

253 Cedrus atlantica Atlas cedar 1 8 8 28 14 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436209.103 1841761.936

254 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 18 18 3 14 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436222.847 1841731.458

255 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 14 14 48 24 Fair Fair Yes Yes Preservation 6436226.61 1841725.151

256 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 11 11 45 24 Fair Fair No Yes Preservation 6436232.438 1841723.41


258 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 12 12 0 0 0 0 40 35 Fair Fair Yes Yes Preservation 6436043.676 1841658.475

259 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 14 14 0 0 0 0 40 18 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436007.406 1841635.138



262 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 10 10 0 0 0 0 40 30 Fair Fair No Yes Preservation 6436019.836 1841577.373



265 Persea americana Avocado 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 12 8 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436046.929 1841540.706



268 Ceiba speciosa Silk floss tree 1 15 15 0 0 0 0 18 30 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436084.23 1841505.074

269 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 1 15 15 0 0 0 0 20 20 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436101.689 1841453.08


271 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 1 7 7 0 0 0 0 10 8 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436135.416 1841538.685

272 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 27 27 0 0 0 0 65 45 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436294.391 1841648.441

273 Archontophoenix cunninghamiana King palm 1 9 9 0 0 0 0 24 12 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436322.14 1841669.88

274 Archontophoenix cunninghamiana King palm 1 10 10 0 0 0 0 30 14 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436328.734 1841674.498

275 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 10 10 0 0 0 0 40 20 Good Fair No Yes Preservation 6436381.255 1841706.568

276 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 11 11 0 0 0 0 40 20 Good Fair No Yes Preservation 6436391.005 1841714.77

277 Archontophoenix cunninghamiana King palm 1 11 11 0 0 0 0 36 12 Fair Poor No No Preservation 6436402.683 1841729.948

278 Archontophoenix cunninghamiana King palm 1 11 11 0 0 0 0 23 12 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436409.095 1841734.446

279 Archontophoenix cunninghamiana King palm 1 11 11 0 0 0 0 23 12 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436436.23 1841750.521

280 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 11 11 0 0 0 0 50 10 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436448.622 1841763.512

281 Ligustrum lucidum Broad-leaf privet 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 8 4 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436512.21 1841664.984

282 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 2 2.828427 2 2 0 0 0 8 4 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436479.557 1841645.464

283 Ligustrum lucidum Broad-leaf privet 2 5 4 3 0 0 0 8 4 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436474.829 1841641.141

284 Ligustrum lucidum Broad-leaf privet 2 5 4 3 0 0 0 8 4 Fair Very poor No No Preservation 6436443.429 1841618.938

285 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 1 3 3 0 0 0 8 4 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436438.479 1841614.464

286 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 1 3 3 0 0 0 8 4 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436433.878 1841611.144

287 Ligustrum lucidum Broad-leaf privet 1 3 3 0 0 0 8 4 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436429.628 1841606.264

288 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 2 3.605551 3 2 0 0 0 10 8 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436408.488 1841593.448



291 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 1 13 13 0 0 0 25 22 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436296.516 1841514.028

292 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 2 8.062258 8 1 0 0 0 14 10 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436279.252 1841499.107


294 Cupressus sempervirens Italian cypress 1 8 8 0 0 0 14 6 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436186.379 1841459.843

7




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)

295 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 1 8 8 0 0 0 12 6 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436196.146 1841383.177

296 Ulmus parvifolia Chinese elm 1 18 18 0 0 0 45 40 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436196.294 1841398.273





301 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 1 9.848858 4 0 0 0 9 9 4 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436199.482 1841411.784


303 Ulmus parvifolia Chinese elm 1 18 18 0 0 0 50 40 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436218.533 1841416.432




307 Juniperus occidentalis Western cedar 1 14 14 0 0 0 30 25 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436250.722 1841409.685

308 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 1 4 4 20 16 Good Good No No Preservation 6437388.348 1841141.115





313 Jacranda mimisifolia Jacaranda 5 12.80625 9 3 4 7 3 25 30 Good Good Yes No Preservation 6437303.015 1841267.449





318 Jacranda mimisifolia Jacaranda 6 19.2873 12 9 8 7 4 3 3 35 35 Good Good Yes No Preservation 6437346.302 1841261.317

319 Jacranda mimisifolia Jacaranda 4 16.58312 9 9 8 7 35 35 Good Good Yes No Preservation 6437369.238 1841274.61

320 Jacranda mimisifolia Jacaranda 6 19.84943 10 9 8 8 7 6 35 35 Good Good Yes No Preservation 6437350.083 1841302.239

321 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 3 10.48809 7 6 5 25 20 Good Poor No No Preservation 6437242.861 1841384.642

322 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 4 11.53256 6 6 6 5 25 20 Good Poor No No Preservation 6437231.999 1841379.886

323 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 4 11.53256 6 6 6 5 25 20 Good Poor No No Preservation 6437208.399 1841394.7

324 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 4 12.08305 7 6 6 5 25 20 Good Poor Yes No Preservation 6437220.004 1841402.96

325 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 4 12.08305 7 6 6 5 25 20 Good Poor Yes No Preservation 6437208.807 1841419.51

326 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 5 12.72792 7 6 6 5 4 25 20 Good Poor Yes No Preservation 6437194.389 1841409.954


328 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 3 14.14214 10 8 6 33 25 Good Poor Yes No Preservation 6437206.235 1841452.547

329 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 3 14.14214 10 8 6 33 25 Good Poor Yes No Preservation 6437233.355 1841443.31


331 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 6 14.86607 8 8 6 5 4 4 25 20 Good Poor Yes No Preservation 6437251.651 1841423.151

332 Populus nigra Italica Lobardy poplar 1 8 8 50 10 Poor Fair No No Preservation 6437239.716 1841530.316





8




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)


338 Populus nigra Italica Lobardy poplar 1 12 12 50 10 Poor Fair Yes No Preservation 6437180.381 1841608.86

339 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 1 3 3 16 14 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6437252.577 1841693.223

340 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 1 7 7 16 14 Poor Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6437251.449 1841693.829

341 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 1 5 5 19 14 Poor Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6437251.157 1841694.847

342 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 12 2.236068 1 1 1 1 1 16 12 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6437283.665 1841721.529

343 Ligustrum lucidum Broad-leaf privet 1 5 5 16 10 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6437290.087 1841727.181

344 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 3 2.44949 1 2 1 16 10 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6437297.904 1841727.935

345 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 1 2 2 6 5 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6437291.445 1841731.451

346 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 15 15 10 1 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area A 6437287.419 1841746.944


348 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 13 13 40 15 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area A 6437381.134 1841817.232

349 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 16 16 60 18 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area A 6437390.877 1841805.224







356 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 14 65 9 Poor Fair Yes No Preservation 6437454.06 1841727.194

357 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 14 65 18 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6437469.12 1841717.454



360 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 15 15 65 18 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6437494.146 1841681.014




364 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 10 10 55 12 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6437541.093 1841621.358















9




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)











389 Lagerstroemia indica Crape myrtle 1 1 1 10 4 Good Fair No No Preservation 6437777.057 1841302.14

390 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 1 3 3 10 6 Good Fair No No Preservation 6437772.88 1841288.507










400 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 17 17 0 0 0 0 60 18 Good Good Yes No Potential Removal - Area E 6437216.715 1841292.092












412 Phoenix dactylifera Date palm 1 15 15 0 0 0 0 45 18 Good Good Yes No Potential Removal - Area E 6437401.758 1841073.354









10




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)















435 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 16 16 0 0 0 0 60 18 Good Good Yes No Preservation 6437049.365 1841411.412


















453 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 16 16 0 0 0 0 60 18 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436863.502 1841805.117










11




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)































493 Lagerstroemia indica Crape myrtle 5 9.055385 5 4 4 3 4 28 26 Good Good No No Preservation 6436792.859 1841731.946

494 Lagerstroemia indica Crape myrtle 5 9.433981 5 4 4 4 4 28 23 Good Good No No Tree Protection 6436788.854 1841750.153


496 Lagerstroemia indica Crape myrtle 6 9.899495 5 4 4 4 4 3 28 23 Good Good No No Tree Protection 6436763.738 1841733.118

497 Lagerstroemia indica Crape myrtle 1 4 4 15 15 Good Good No No Preservation 6436743.785 1841693.398


499 Lagerstroemia indica Crape myrtle 5 7.681146 4 3 3 4 3 27 23 Good Good No No Tree Protection 6436714.824 1841695.357






12




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)

505 Phoenix dactylifera Date palm 1 14 14 40 18 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6437425.021 1841078.274

506 Phoenix dactylifera Date palm 1 14 14 40 22 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6437436.302 1841102.453

507 Jacranda mimisifolia Jacaranda 5 9.165151 5 4 3 3 5 14 24 Good Fair No No Preservation 6437444.794 1841092.267

508 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 5 11.74734 5 6 6 5 4 16 20 Good Fair No No Preservation 6437481.442 1841139.978

509 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 3 14.52584 9 9 7 20 25 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6437477.312 1841143.847

510 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 5 12.49 9 5 3 4 5 23 25 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6437499.69 1841160.709

511 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 3 10.63015 7 8 23 25 Good Fair No No Preservation 6437533.207 1841179.036

512 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 4 11.74734 7 8 4 3 23 25 Good Fair No No Preservation 6437555.563 1841194.748

513 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 4 11.74734 7 8 4 3 23 25 Good Fair No No Preservation 6437570.033 1841207.045

514 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 1 10 10 24 28 Good Fair No No Preservation 6437673.374 1841263.069












526 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 1 13 13 30 28 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6437498.569 1841503.267

527 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 1 28 28 70 60 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area A 6437355.045 1841862.515








535 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 1 9 9 40 3 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6437312.807 1841904.32












13




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)









555 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 3 12.80625 8 6 8 34 24 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area A 6437233.446 1841987.808




























583 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 18 18 55 40 Fair Fair Yes Yes Potential Removal - Area A 6436976.206 1841984.557

584 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 1 3 3 14 8 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6436974.838 1842005.347

585 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 9 9 35 20 Fair Fair No Yes Potential Removal - Area A 6436962.489 1841948.252

586 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 11 11 35 20 Fair Fair No Yes Potential Removal - Area A 6436966.694 1841940.685

587 Pyrus calleryana Pyrus calleryana 1 4 4 16 12 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area B 6436314.52 1842247.908


14




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)




592 Eucalyptus globulus Blue gum 1 12 12 35 30 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area D 6435632.754 1841891.785

593 Eucalyptus globulus Blue gum 1 28 28 65 55 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area D 6435633.996 1841877.312

594 Eriobotrya japonica Loquat 1 3 3 14 12 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area D 6435649.365 1841901.253

595 Prunus spp. Prunus spp. 3 5.09902 3 3 2 2 8 14 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area D 6435622.983 1841921.666

596 Eucalyptus camaldulensis Red gum 1 9 9 40 20 Poor Fair No No Potential Removal - Area D 6435626.622 1841914.231

597 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 14 14 60 30 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area D 6435642.234 1841936.319

598 Eucalyptus globulus Blue gum 3 13.45362 9 6 8 45 30 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area D 6435626.581 1841948.414

599 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 2 14.14214 10 10 30 30 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area D 6435655.081 1841938.339

600 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 14 14 60 30 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area D 6435652.847 1841956.303

601 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 1 10 10 60 30 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area D 6435670.242 1841970.018




605 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 1 12 12 40 20 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area D 6435704.67 1841963.256













618 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 1 25 25 40 28 Good Poor Yes No Potential Removal - Area D 6435819.503 1842074.117













15




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)















645 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 2 7.211103 4 6 28 15 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area D 6435863.564 1842143.003



























672 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 3 19.89975 14 10 10 50 45 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area D 6435986.95 1842262.55

16




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)







679 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 1 8 8 30 18 Good Fair No No Tree Protection 6436016.077 1842330.454


681 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 1 12 12 35 20 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436023.341 1842338.607

682 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 1 9 9 40 20 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436030.296 1842338.36

683 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 1 3 3 30 8 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436034.439 1842339.732

684 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 1 6 6 35 10 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436041.006 1842339.002





689 Liquidambar styraciflua 'Rotundiloba' Sweetgum rotundiloba 1 6 6 20 18 Good Fair No No Preservation 6437796.447 1841301.641

690 Liquidambar styraciflua 'Rotundiloba' Sweetgum rotundiloba 1 6 6 20 18 Good Fair No No Preservation 6437791.692 1841288.549

691 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweetgum 1 6 6 35 18 Good Fair No No Preservation 6437795.634 1841272.318












703 Podocarpus gracilior Fern pine 1 2 2 10 6 Good Poor No No Preservation 6437054.296 1840729.928












17




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)














728 Melaleuca quinquenervia Broad-leaved paperbark 3 19.20937 12 12 9 0 0 45 35 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area C 6436488.906 1841266.661

729 Melaleuca quinquenervia Broad-leaved paperbark 1 15 15 0 0 45 25 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area C 6436515.528 1841280.621


731 Melaleuca quinquenervia Broad-leaved paperbark 3 26.57066 20 15 9 0 45 35 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area C 6436559.824 1841314.35


733 Melaleuca quinquenervia Broad-leaved paperbark 1 18 18 0 50 25 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area C 6436595.466 1841343.462

734 Pyrus calleryana Pyrus calleryana 1 4 4 0 18 10 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area C 6436595.646 1841358.665




738 Melaleuca quinquenervia Broad-leaved paperbark 2 19.20937 15 12 0 50 35 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area C 6436645.608 1841379.358



741 Lagerstroemia indica Crape myrtle 1 9 9 0 25 18 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area C 6436673.053 1841418.625












753 Thuja spp. Cedar 1 17 17 0 40 25 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area C 6436531.645 1841380.753

754 Thuja spp. Cedar 5 21.35416 2 12 16 6 4 40 25 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area C 6436524.036 1841392.849


756 Melaleuca quinquenervia Broad-leaved paperbark 9 17.80449 4 9 4 8 2 8 6 6 6 24 22 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area C 6436480.171 1841332.866

18




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)

757 Melaleuca quinquenervia Broad-leaved paperbark 6 18.97367 10 8 7 7 7 7 24 22 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area C 6436458.029 1841321.566



760 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 3 6.403124 4 4 3 8 8 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area C 6436332.594 1841414.652

761 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 4 12.60952 7 6 5 7 8 8 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area C 6436333.084 1841421.637

762 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 1 6 6 6 4 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area C 6436374.694 1841450.975

763 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 3 10.48809 6 5 7 7 7 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area C 6436407.478 1841474.263

764 Cupressus sempervirens Italian cypress 1 6 6 35 5 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area C 6436467.559 1841492.761



767 Melaleuca quinquenervia Broad-leaved paperbark 1 12 12 30 25 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area C 6436536.266 1841543.276

768 Melaleuca quinquenervia Broad-leaved paperbark 1 7 7 22 16 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area C 6436563.509 1841563.257




772 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 1 8 8 9 6 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area C 6436576.519 1841597.882

773 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 2 9.219544 7 6 9 6 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area C 6436582.163 1841601.226

774 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 3 10.04988 7 6 4 8 6 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area C 6436585.372 1841604.154

775 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 5 26.36285 16 14 9 9 9 35 35 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436566.717 1841640.012

776 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 2 11.40175 9 7 18 9 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436466.591 1841584.398

777 Ficus benjamina Weeping fig 3 12.4499 9 7 5 18 9 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436459.947 1841580.706

778 Pyrus calleryana Pyrus calleryana 1 6 6 16 10 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436437.262 1841562.222



781 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 2 21.26029 16 14 35 35 Fair Fair Yes No Preservation 6436358.947 1841514.427


783 Eugenia spp. Eugenia 4 5.91608 4 3 3 1 7 6 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436309.983 1841473.417


785 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 1 7 7 5 5 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436246.553 1841616.574

786 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 2 11.6619 10 6 8 6 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area B 6436528.401 1841737.857


788 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 1 5 5 5 5 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area B 6436510.3 1841764.742

789 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 3 12.12436 7 7 7 8 8 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436507.379 1841771.948


791 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 4 12.08305 7 6 6 5 8 8 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436478.769 1841810.662

792 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 3 9.848858 5 6 6 6 6 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area B 6436473.667 1841816.111







19




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)






804 Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy date palm 3 12.72792 7 8 7 7 7 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436418.741 1841893.464




808 Cupressus sempervirens Italian cypress 1 1 1 16 1 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436409.02 1841835.329










818 Ficus macrophylla Moreton bay fig 1 40 40 50 70 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436317.941 1842190.503

819 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 3 13.78405 9 10 3 18 22 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436300.308 1842154.256




823 Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian laurel fig 1 15 15 45 35 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436361.661 1842041.322


825 Podocarpus gracilior Fern pine 1 23 23 60 60 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436347.444 1842000.407

826 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 2 28.84441 24 16 40 40 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436383.042 1842036.173

827 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 4 29.22328 18 16 15 7 40 35 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436399.262 1842016.909

828 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 12 30.54505 13 13 12 11 11 9 8 8 9 35 35 Poor Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436424.131 1841988.21



831 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 5 32.98485 20 14 10 14 14 50 45 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436484.593 1841891.936


833 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 5 28 18 18 8 6 6 50 40 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436506.187 1841848.41

834 Pyrus calleryana Pyrus calleryana 2 5.830952 5 3 16 8 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area B 6436518.491 1841836.902

835 Pyrus calleryana Pyrus calleryana 1 6 6 16 14 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area B 6436526.61 1841822.098



838 Pyrus calleryana Pyrus calleryana 2 5.09902 5 1 16 10 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area B 6436561.789 1841775.168



20




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)


842 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 6 48.73397 35 15 18 9 14 18 50 60 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436621.763 1841682.569



845 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 9 33.68976 16 12 9 7 14 11 12 12 13 45 40 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436626.974 1841748.961







852 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 15 15 80 18 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436532.159 1841908.974

853 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 1 18 18 45 45 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436518.51 1841913.517


855 Syagrus romanzoffiana Queen palm 3 14.45683 9 8 8 20 18 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436495.021 1841998.295




859 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 4 10.29563 6 6 5 3 12 18 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area B 6436506.233 1842036.544

860 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 3 9.273618 6 5 5 10 16 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area B 6436478.861 1842086.444

861 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 6 9.165151 5 4 4 3 3 3 14 18 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area B 6436467.783 1842099.976

862 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 2 28.84441 24 16 70 55 Fair Fair Yes Yes Potential Removal - Area B 6436425.606 1842112.483

863 Eucalyptus ficifolia Red flowering gum 1 21 21 40 40 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436449.321 1842120.313

864 Callistemon viminalis Weeping bottlebrush 1 9 9 16 18 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area B 6436433.373 1842144.134

865 Pyrus calleryana Pyrus calleryana 3 7.549834 5 4 4 25 18 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area B 6436435.434 1842176.574

866 Jacranda mimisifolia Jacaranda 1 20 20 50 45 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436402.918 1842155.829





871 Lagerstroemia indica Crape myrtle 4 15.16575 8 6 9 7 35 25 Fair Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436370.24 1842138.223


873 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 6 30 15 12 15 9 15 30 40 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436707.239 1841651.793

874 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 3 24.37212 15 12 15 30 40 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436716.066 1841634.23



877 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 1 11.53256 7 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 24 20 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436749.475 1841604.164

878 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 4 7.071068 4 3 4 3 24 20 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436763.393 1841593.934


880 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 2 5 4 3 20 18 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436776.942 1841583.695



21




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)

883 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 1 6.708204 6 3 20 18 Fair Fair No No Preservation 6436795.239 1841553.452


885 Hibiscus syriacus Rose-of-Sharon 3 13.45362 9 8 6 15 18 Poor Fair Yes No Preservation 6436815.154 1841521.855


887 Kigelia pinnata Sausage tree 1 34 34 35 30 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436854.545 1841471.489

888 Kigelia pinnata Sausage tree 1 24 24 35 30 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436871.892 1841447.832

889 Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood juniper 3 9.433981 8 3 4 27 18 Good Fair No No Preservation 6436882.787 1841434.362

890 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 4 26.24881 12 16 15 8 35 40 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436890.582 1841398.53


892 Callistemon viminalis Weeping bottlebrush 3 24.39262 17 15 9 27 25 Good Fair Yes No Preservation 6436921.17 1841392.603

893 Lophostemon confertus Brisbane box 1 2 2 18 8 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area C 6436767.855 1841349.604

894 Erythrina caffra Coral tree 2 18.43909 12 14 22 28 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area C 6436766.931 1841489.846

895 Phoenix dactylifera Date palm 1 14 14 35 18 Good Good Yes No Potential Removal - Area E 6437310.028 1840999.286




899 Phoenix dactylifera Date palm 1 14 14 35 18 Good Good Yes No Preservation 6437183.319 1840912.656

900 Phoenix dactylifera Date palm 1 14 14 35 18 Good Good Yes No Preservation 6437167.772 1840901.328

901 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 1 7 7 20 22 Good Good No No Potential Removal - Area A 6436931.182 1842141.156

902 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 1 6 6 20 22 Good Good No No Potential Removal - Area A 6436935.987 1842141.212

903 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 1 6 6 14 12 Poor Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6436952.981 1842153.289

904 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 13 13 33 28 Fair Fair Yes Yes Potential Removal - Area A 6436986.024 1842175.582

905 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 2 20.51828 15 14 47 38 Fair Fair Yes Yes Potential Removal - Area A 6437053.826 1842133.532

906 Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese flame tree 1 3 3 12 8 Fair Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6436937.595 1842160.025

907 Cupressus sempervirens Italian cypress 1 6 6 14 3 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6436939.172 1842161.844


















22




Canopy


Over 12-in


Tree


Diameter

(in.)

Height

(ft.)















939 Geijera parviflora Australian willow 1 3 3 16 14 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6437005.29 1842206.793

940 Geijera parviflora Australian willow 4 5.09902 3 3 2 2 16 14 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6436998.514 1842193.213




944 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp gum 5 22.13594 14 13 6 5 8 35 30 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area A 6437018.372 1842204.673

945 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp gum 2 14.86607 11 10 45 30 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area A 6437026.753 1842201.635

946 Pinus canariensis Canary island pine 1 9 9 35 12 Good Fair No No Potential Removal - Area A 6437022.424 1842218.912
















962 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 15 15 40 12 Good Fair Yes No Potential Removal - Area B 6436559.782 1842387.262





23

APPENDIX B

Tree Location Exhibit

Index Grid Legend

Appendix B

SOURCE: Bing Maps, 2015

Date:

11/2/2

015 -

Last s

aved b

y: cbat

tle -

Path:

Z:\Pro

jects\j

925701

\MAPD

OC\DO

CUME

NT\Ap

pendix

_B_In

dexLeg

end.mx

d

0 500250 Feetn

966

965

963

872871

870869

868

865

864

863

862

861

860

859

858

857

856

855

828

827

826

825

824

823

822

821

820

819

818

688

687 685

684681

680

673

2

591

588

587

243

232

229

227

228

230

231

34

589590

674

675

676677

678

679

682

683

686

866

867

962

964

Tree Locations Exhibit

Appendix B


Date:

11/16/

2015

- Last

saved

by: cb

attle -

Path

: Z:\P

rojects

\j92750

1\MAP

DOC\D

OCUM

ENT\A

ppendi

x_B.mx

d

Grid 1

Botanical Name

Callistemon viminalis

Erythrina caffra

Eucalyptus ficifolia

Ficus macrophylla

Ficus microcarpanitida

Ficus rubiginosa

Jacranda mimisifolia

Juniperus chinensis’Torulosa’

Lagerstroemia indica

Pinus eldarica

Platanus racemosa

Podocarpus gracilior

Pyrus calleryana

Syagrusromanzoffiana

Washingtoniarobusta

0 10050 Feet

673

672

671

670

669

667

666663

662

659

657

654

651

650

649647

645

639

637

635

634

629626

625

620

617615

614

612

611

610

609

608607

606

605

604

602600

599

598

596

595

594

593

236

235

232

229

227

226

225

224

223

222

228

230

231

233

234

592

597

601

603

613

616

618

619

621622623

624

627

628

630

631632

633

636

638640

641

642643

644

646

648

652653

655

656

658

660

661

664

665

668


Appendix B


Date:

11/16/

2015

- Last

saved

by: cb

attle -

Path

: Z:\P

rojects

\j92750

1\MAP

DOC\D

OCUM

ENT\A

ppendi

x_B.mx

d

Grid 2

Botanical Name

Eriobotrya japonica

Eucalyptuscamaldulensis

Eucalyptus globulus

Ficus benjamina



Pinus canariensis

Pinus eldarica

Prunus spp.

Washingtoniarobusta

0 10050 Feet

961

960

959

958

957

955

953

951

950

948

947944

942940

938

931

926

922

917

911906

905

904

903

902

586

585

584

583

582

581

580

575

571

567

563

559556

553 551

549 546

544541

540

537534

532

530

528

527

492

491455

350

349

348

453

529

531

533

535

536538539

542

543545547548

550552

554555

557

558

560

561

562564

565

566

568

569

570572

573

574

576

577

578

579

901907

908909910912

913

914915916

918

919920921

923924925

927

928929930

932933

934935

936937

939941

943

945

946

949

952

954

956


Appendix B


Date:

11/16/

2015

- Last

saved

by: cb

attle -

Path

: Z:\P

rojects

\j92750

1\MAP

DOC\D

OCUM

ENT\A

ppendi

x_B.mx

d

Grid 3

Botanical Name

Arbutus unedo

Cupressussempervirens

Eucalyptus ovata


Geijera parviflora

Koelreuteriabipinnata

Pinus canariensis

Platanus racemosa

Washingtoniarobusta

0 10050 Feet

886

885

884

883

882

880

878

877

876

875

874

873

854

853852

851

850

849848

847846

845

844

843

842

841

840

839

837

836

834

833

832

831

830

829

817

815

813

810

807

806

802

801

797

794

793

791

789

787

786

5

781

780

779

778

777

775

774

772

771

768

767

766

499

498

497

496

495

494

493

492

455

452

451

450

449

448

447

446

445

291

290

289

288

287285

283

281

280

279

278

276

275

274

272

248

247

246

245

244

9

273

277

282

284

286

453

4

769

770

773

776

788

790

792

795

796

798799

800

803

804805

808809

811812

814

816

835

838

879

881


Appendix B


Date:

11/16/

2015

- Last

saved

by: cb

attle -

Path

: Z:\P

rojects

\j92750

1\MAP

DOC\D

OCUM

ENT\A

ppendi

x_B.mx

d

Grid 4

Botanical Name

Archontophoenixcunninghamiana


Erythrina caffra

Ficus benjamina


Hibiscus syriacus



Ligustrum lucidum

Liriodendrontulipifera

Melaleucaquinquenervia

Phoenix roebelenii

Pinus canariensis

Platanus racemosa


Pyrus calleryana

Washingtoniarobusta

0 10050 Feet

785

784

782

761

307

306

305

303

301298

297 295

294

293

291

274

272

271

270

269

268

267

266

265

264

263

261

260259

258

257

256

254

253

252

251

248

247

242

241

240

238

236

225223

222

221

218214

213

212

211

210

209207

206

199

198

197

196

195

194

193

192191

190

189

188

187

186

184

185

208

215216

217

219220

237239

249250

255

262

273

292

296

299

300302

304

760

783


Appendix B


Date:

11/16/

2015

- Last

saved

by: cb

attle -

Path

: Z:\P

rojects

\j92750

1\MAP

DOC\D

OCUM

ENT\A

ppendi

x_B.mx

d

Grid 5

Botanical Name

Arbutus unedo

Archontophoenixcunninghamiana

Cedrus atlantica

Ceiba speciosa

Corymbia citriodora


Eucalyptus nicholii

Eugenia spp.

Ficus benjamina



Juniperusoccidentalis

Ligustrum lucidum


Persea americana

Phoenix roebelenii

Pinus canariensis

Platanus racemosa


Scheffleraactinophylla

Schinus molle

Ulmus parvifolia

Washingtoniarobusta

0 10050 Feet

892

891

890

889

888

492

491

490

489

488

487

486

485

484

483

482

481

480

479

478

477

476

475

472

471

469

468

467

466

465

464

463

462

461

460

459

458

457

456

455

445

444

443

442

441

440

439

438

437

436

435

3359

358

357

356

355

354

353

352

351

350

349

347

346

345

342

341

338

337

335

333

331

329

328

327

326

325

324

323

322321

330

332

334

336

339340

343 344

453

454

470


Appendix B


Date:

11/16/

2015

- Last

saved

by: cb

attle -

Path

: Z:\P

rojects

\j92750

1\MAP

DOC\D

OCUM

ENT\A

ppendi

x_B.mx

d

Grid 6

Botanical Name


Erythrina caffra

Ficus benjamina


Kigelia pinnata


Ligustrum lucidum

Phoenix roebelenii

Pinus canariensis

Populus nigra Italica

Washingtoniarobusta

0 10050 Feet

692

691

690

689

526

525

524

523

522

521

520

519

517

516515

514

392

391

390

389

388

387

386

385

384

383

382

381

380

378

377

376

375

374

373372

371

370

369

368

367

366

365

364363

362

361

360359

358

320

319

318

317

316

4

313

312

311

379


Appendix B


Date:

11/16/

2015

- Last

saved

by: cb

attle -

Path

: Z:\P

rojects

\j92750

1\MAP

DOC\D

OCUM

ENT\A

ppendi

x_B.mx

d

Grid 7

Botanical Name

Arbutus unedo




Liquidambarstyraciflua

Liquidambarstyraciflua’Rotundiloba’

Pinus canariensis


0 10050 Feet

894

893

892

891

890

889

888

887

886

885

884

883

882

880

878

877

876

875

874

873

784

782

781

780

779

778

777

775

774

772

771

768

767

766

764

763

762

761

759

758

757

756

755

754

753752

750

749

747

746

745

744

742

741

740

739

738

737

736

735

733

732

731

730

729

728

448

447

446

445

444

443

442

290

289

288

287285

283

179

178177

176

175172

171

166

165

164

160

159

158

156

173174

282

284

286

734

743

748

751

760

765

769

770

773

776

783

879

881


Appendix B


Date:

11/16/

2015

- Last

saved

by: cb

attle -

Path

: Z:\P

rojects

\j92750

1\MAP

DOC\D

OCUM

ENT\A

ppendi

x_B.mx

d

Grid 8

Botanical Name



Erythrina caffra

Eugenia spp.

Feijoa sellowiana

Ficus benjamina


Hibiscus syriacus

Ilex opaca


Kigelia pinnata


Ligustrum lucidum


Lophostemonconfertus

Magnolia grandiflora


Phoenix roebelenii


Pyrus calleryana

Quercus agriolia

Schinusterbinthifolius

Thuja spp.

Washingtoniarobusta

0 10050 Feet

99

98 97

96

9591

88

83

82

818078

76

75

74

73

70

68

67

66

65

64

63

62

60

58

55

5049

48

46

45

44

43

39

36

35

34

32 31

29

2827

25

2221

20 19

759

758

757

756

755

754

753752

750

749

736

735

733

732

731

730

729

728

307

303

301298

297 295

205204

203

202

201

200

199

198

183

182181

180

179

178177

176

175172

171170

169

168167

166

165

164

163

162

161

160

159

158

157

156

155

153

151

150149

135

134

125

120

119

118

117

116

115

113

112

111

110

109

108107

104

103100

105106

114

121

122

123

124

126

127128

129

130 131

132

133

152

154

173174

296

299

300302

734

748

751

760

2324

26

30

33

3738

404142

47

5152

5354

56

5759

61

69

7172

77

79 8485

8687

8990

9293

94


Appendix B


Date:

11/16/

2015

- Last

saved

by: cb

attle -

Path

: Z:\P

rojects

\j92750

1\MAP

DOC\D

OCUM

ENT\A

ppendi

x_B.mx

d

Grid 9

Botanical Name

Callistemon pallidus

Camellia sinensis

Ceiba speciosa

Cercis occidentalis


Erythrina caffra

Eucalyptus globulus

Feijoa sellowiana

Ficus benjamina


Ginkgo biloba

Ilex opaca


Juniperusoccidentalis


Ligustrum lucidum


Lophostemonconfertus

Magnolia grandiflora


Persea americana

Phoenix roebelenii

Pinus canariensis

Pittosporum tobira

Platanus racemosa


Pyrus calleryana

Quercus agriolia

Scheffleraactinophylla

Schinusterbinthifolius

Syzygiumpaniculatum

Thuja spp.

Ulmus parvifolia

Unknown spp.

Washingtoniarobusta

0 10050 Feet

900

899

898

897

896

895

699

698

697

696

695

694

693

6

519

518

517

516515

514

513

512

511

510

509

507

506

505

504

503

502

501

500

474

473

434

433

432

431

430

429

428

427

426

425

424

423

422

421

420

419

418

417

416

415

414

413

412411

410

409

408

407

406

405

404

403

402

401

400

399

398

397

396

395

394

393

392

391

390

38

387

320

319

318

317

316

315

314

313

312

311

310

309

308 508


Appendix B


Date:

11/16/

2015

- Last

saved

by: cb

attle -

Path

: Z:\P

rojects

\j92750

1\MAP

DOC\D

OCUM

ENT\A

ppendi

x_B.mx

d

Grid 10

Botanical Name

Arbutus unedo




Phoenix dactylifera

Pinus canariensis


Washingtoniarobusta

0 10050 Feet

98

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

99

98 97

96

29

2827

25

2221

20 19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

148

147

146

145

144143

141

140

139 138

137 136

135

134

125

119

118

117113

112

111

110

109

108107

104

103

102101

100

105106

122124

127128

129

130 131

132

133

142

1011

2324

26

93


Appendix B


Date:

11/16/

2015

- Last

saved

by: cb

attle -

Path

: Z:\P

rojects

\j92750

1\MAP

DOC\D

OCUM

ENT\A

ppendi

x_B.mx

d

Grid 11

Botanical Name

Acer palmatum

Brachychitonacerifolius

Cercis occidentalis

Eucalyptus cinerea

Ficus benjamina


Ginkgo biloba


Olea europaea

Phoenix roebelenii

Pinus canariensis

Pittosporum tobira

Platanus racemosa


0 10050 Feet

727

726

725

724

723

722

721

720

719

718

717

716

715

714

713

712

711 710

709

708

707

706

705

704

703

702

701

700


Appendix B


Date:

11/16/

2015

- Last

saved

by: cb

attle -

Path

: Z:\P

rojects

\j92750

1\MAP

DOC\D

OCUM

ENT\A

ppendi

x_B.mx

d

Grid 12

Botanical Name



Washingtoniarobusta

0 10050 Feet

APPENDIX C

Tree Disposition Exhibit

!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!

!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!

!!!!!

!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!

!!

! ! !

!!!!!! ! !!!

!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !

! !

!!!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!! ! ! !

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!

!!

!!!

!

!!!!!

!!

!!!!!!!

! !! !

! !!

!

!!

!!!!!!

!!!!

!!!

!! !

!!!!!

!!!

!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

!!

!

!!!

!

!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!!!!!

!!!

! !!!!

!!

! !!

! !!!!!

!! !!!!

!!!

! !!

! ! ! !

!

!

!!

!!!

!!!!

!! !

!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!

!!!!!!!!! !!

!!!

!!!!!! ! !

!!

!!

!!!

!

!!

! !!

!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!

! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!

!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

!!

! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

!!!

!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! !!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!

! !! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!! !

!!!

!!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

! !

!!

!!

!

! !!!

! !!

!!!!

!!

!!! ! !!!! !!!!

!!!

!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!

!!!!! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!

!!! !

!!

!!!!!!!

!!!!!!

!! !

!! !

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!!

!!!!!

!!!!!!!

! !!

!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!!

!!!!

!!!!!

!!!!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!

!! ! ! !

!!

!! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !!!!!

!

!!!!

!!!

!!!!

!!!

!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

! !! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

!! !

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!!

!

!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! !!

!!

!!!

Tree Disposition Exhibit

21st Century Fox Protected Tree Report

0 400200 FeetI

Appendix C

Legend

Potential Tree Impact Disposition

! Remain in Place (534 Trees)

! Area A (132 Trees)

! Area B (83 Trees)

! Area C (49 Trees)

! Area D (102 Trees)

! Area E (39 Trees)

! Area F (18 Trees)

! Tree Protection Recommended (9 Trees)

PropertyLine

Proposed Project Area

A

B

C

D

E

F

APPENDIX D

Tree Protection Measures

Appendix D – Tree Protection Measures

The following sections are included as general guidelines for tree protection from construction impacts. The measures presented should be monitored by arborists and enforced by contractors and developers for maximum benefit to the trees.

Tree Protection Measures Prior to Construction

Fencing: All remaining trees that will not be relocated or removed should be preserved and protected in place. Trees within approximately 15 feet of proposed construction activity should be temporarily fenced with chain link or other material satisfactory to City planning staff throughout grading and construction activities. The fencing should be installed 3 feet outside of the dripline of each tree (or edge of canopy for cluster of trees), be 4 feet tall, and staked every 6 feet. The fenced area should be considered the tree protection zone (TPZ) unless proximate construction required temporary removal.

Pre-Construction Meeting: A pre-construction meeting should be held between all contractors (including grading, tree removal/pruning, builders, etc.) and the arborist. The arborist will instruct the contractors on tree protection practices and answer any questions. All equipment operators and spotters, assistants, or those directing operators from the ground, should provide written acknowledgement of their receiving tree protection training. This training should include information on the location and marking of protected trees, the necessity of preventing damage, and the discussion of work practices that will accomplish such.

Protection and Maintenance During Construction Once construction activities have begun the following measures should be adhered to:

Equipment Operation and Storage: Avoid heavy equipment operation around the trees. Operating heavy machinery around the root zones of trees will increase soil compaction, which decreases soil aeration and subsequently reduces water penetration in the soil. All heavy equipment and vehicles should, at minimum, stay out of the fenced TPZ, unless where specifically approved in writing and under the supervision of a Certified Arborist or as provided by the approved landscape plan.

Storage and Disposal: Do not store or discard any supply or material, including paint, lumber, concrete overflow, etc. within the protection zone. Remove all foreign debris within the protection zone; it is important to leave the duff, mulch, chips, and leaves around the retained trees for water retention and nutrients. Avoid draining or leakage of equipment fluids near retained trees. Fluids such as gasoline, diesel, oils, hydraulics, brake and transmission fluids, paint, paint thinners, and glycol (anti-freeze) should be disposed of properly. Keep equipment parked at least 50 feet away from retained trees to avoid the possibility of leakage of equipment fluids into the soil. The effect of toxic equipment fluids on the retained trees could lead to decline and death.

Grade Changes: Grade changes, including adding fill, are not permitted within the TPZ without special written authorization and under the supervision of a Certified Arborist or as provided by the approved landscape plan. Lowering the grade within this area will necessitate cutting main support and feeder roots, jeopardizing the health and structural integrity of the tree(s). Adding soil, even temporarily, on top of the existing grade will compact the soil further, and decrease both water and air availability to the trees’ roots.

Tree Protection Measures Page 2

Moving Construction Materials: Care will be taken when moving equipment or supplies near the trees, especially overhead. Avoid damaging the tree(s) when transporting or moving construction materials and working around the tree (even outside of the fenced tree protection zone). Above ground tree parts that could be damaged (e.g., low limbs, trunks) should be flagged with red ribbon. If contact with the tree crown is unavoidable, prune the conflicting branch(es) using International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) standards.

Root Pruning: Except where specifically approved in writing or as provided in Attachment 3, all trenching should be outside of the fenced protection zone. Roots primarily extend in a horizontal direction forming a support base to the tree similar to the base of a wineglass. Where trenching is necessary in areas that contain tree roots, prune the roots using a Dosko root pruner or equivalent. All cuts should be clean and sharp, to minimize ripping, tearing, and fracturing of the root system. The trench should be made no deeper than necessary.

Irrigation: Trees that have been substantially root pruned (30% or more of their root zone) will require irrigation for the first 12 months. The first irrigation should be within 48 hours of root pruning. They should be deep watered every 2 to 4 weeks during the summer and once a month during the winter (adjust accordingly with rainfall). One irrigation cycle should thoroughly soak the root zones of the trees to a depth of 3 feet. The soil should dry out between watering; avoid keeping a consistently wet soil. Designate one person to be responsible for irrigating (deep watering) the trees. Check soil moisture with a soil probe before irrigating. Irrigation is best accomplished by installing a temporary above ground micro-spray system that will distribute water slowly (to avoid runoff) and evenly throughout the fenced protection zone but never soaking the area located within 6 feet of the

tree trunk, especially during warmer months.

Pruning: Do not prune any of the trees until all construction is completed. This will help protect the tree canopies from damage. All pruning should be completed under the direction of an ISA Certified Arborist and using ISA guidelines. Only dead wood should be removed from tree canopies.

Washing: During construction in summer and autumn months, wash foliage of trees adjacent to the construction sites with a strong water stream every two weeks in early hours before 10:00 a.m. to control mite and insect populations.

Inspection: An ISA Certified Arborist should inspect the impacted preserved trees on a monthly basis during construction. A report comparing tree health and condition to the original, pre-construction baseline should be submitted following each inspection. Photographs of representative trees are to be included in the report on a minimum annual basis.

Maintenance After Construction Once construction is complete the fencing may be removed and the following measures performed to sustain and enhance the vigor of the preserved trees.

Mulch: Provide a 4-inch mulch layer under the canopy of trees. Mulch should include clean, organic mulch that will provide long-term soil conditioning, soil moisture retention, and soil temperature control.

Pruning: The trees will not require regular pruning. Pruning should only be done to maintain clearance and remove broken, dead or diseased branches. Pruning should only take place following a recommendation by an ISA Certified Arborist and performed under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist. No more than 20% of the canopy should be removed at any one time. All pruning should conform to ISA standards.

Tree Protection Measures Page 3

Watering: The natural trees that are not disturbed should not require regular irrigation, other than the 12 months following substantial root pruning. However, soil probing will be necessary to accurately monitor moisture levels. Especially in years with low winter rainfall, supplemental irrigation for the trees that sustained root pruning and any newly planted trees may be necessary. The trees should be irrigated only during the winter and spring months.

Watering Adjacent Plant Material: All plants near the trees should be compatible with water requirements of said trees. The surrounding plants should be watered infrequently with deep soaks and allowed to dry out in-between, rather than frequent light irrigation. The soil should not be allowed to become saturated or stay continually wet. Irrigation spray should not hit the trunk of any tree. A 60-inch dry-zone should be maintained around all tree trunks. An aboveground micro-spray irrigation system is recommended over typical underground pop-up sprays.

Washing: Periodic washing of the foliage is recommended during construction but no more than once every 2 weeks. Washing should include the upper and lower leaf surfaces and the tree bark. This should continue beyond the construction period at a less frequent rate with a high-powered hose only in the early morning hours. Washing will help control dirt/dust buildup that can lead to mite and insect infestations.

Spraying: If the trees are maintained in a healthy state, regular spraying for insect or disease control should not be necessary. If a problem does develop, an ISA Certified Arborist should be consulted; the trees may require application of insecticides to prevent the intrusion of bark-boring beetles and other invading pests. All chemical spraying should be performed by a licensed applicator under the direction of a licensed pest control advisor.

Inspection: All trees that were impacted during construction within the TPZ should be monitored by an ISA Certified Arborist for the first 5 years after construction completion. The Arborist should submit an annual report, photograph each tree and compare tree health and condition to the original, pre-construction baseline.

APPENDIX B SCCIC Records Search

APPENDIX C Paleontology Records Search

Vertebrate Paleontology SectionTelephone: (213) 763-3325

Fax: (213) 746-7431e-mail: [email protected]

5 November 2015

Meridian Consultants910 Hampshire Road, Suite VWestlake Village, CA 91361

Attn: Jeff Carr, Senior Planner / Cultural Resource Specialist

re: Paleontological resources for the proposed Fox Studios MP Project, Meridian Project #087-001-15, in the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, project area

Dear Jeff:

I have conducted a thorough check of our paleontology collection records for the localityand specimen data for the proposed Fox Studios MP Project, Meridian Project # 087-001-15, inthe City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, project area as outlined on the portion of theBeverly Hills USGS topographic quadrangle map that you sent to me via e-mail on 30 October2015. We do not have any vertebrate fossil localities that lie directly within the proposed projectsite boundaries, but we do have localities nearby from the same sedimentary units that occur inthe proposed project area.

The entire proposed project area has surficial deposits of older Quaternary Alluvium, withterrestrial deposits in the northern portion and supposedly marine deposits in part of the southernportion. Our closest vertebrate fossil locality in these older Quaternary sediments is LACM5501, directly north of the proposed project area south of Olympic Boulevard between Avenue ofthe Stars and Century Park East, that produced fossil specimens of pond turtle, Clemmysmarmorata, dog, Canis, and horse, Equus, at shallow but unstated depth. Near the intersection ofWilshire Boulevard and Bedford Drive, north-northeast of the proposed project area, ourlocalities LACM 3355 and 3821 produced specimens of fossil horse, Equus, and even-toedungulates, Artiodactyla, at a depth of 40 feet below the surface. Our locality LACM 5833,northwest of the proposed project area south of Wilshire Boulevard between Thayer and

Westholme Avenues, produced fossils of horse, Equus, kangaroo rat, Dipodomys, wood rat,Neotoma, meadow vole, Microtus, and pocket gopher, Thomomys, at shallow but unstated depth. Farther away we have numerous localities in the older Quaternary sediments that have producedfossil specimens typical of the fauna from the Rancho La Brea asphalt deposits about 2.5 mileseast of the proposed project area.

Excavations in the older Quaternary Alluvium deposits exposed throughout the proposedproject area may well encounter significant vertebrate fossils. Any substantial excavations in theproposed project area, therefore, should be monitored closely to quickly and professionallyrecover any fossil remains discovered while not impeding development. Also, sediment samplesshould be collected and processed to determine the small fossil potential in the proposed projectarea. Any fossils recovered during mitigation should be deposited in an accredited andpermanent scientific institution for the benefit of current and future generations.

This records search covers only the vertebrate paleontology records of the Natural HistoryMuseum of Los Angeles County. It is not intended to be a thorough paleontological survey ofthe proposed project area covering other institutional records, a literature survey, or any potentialon-site survey.

Sincerely,

Samuel A. McLeod, Ph.D.Vertebrate Paleontology

enclosure: invoice

APPENDIX D Geotechnical Report

199 S. Hudson Avenue, Suite 110 Pasadena, CA 91101

PH 626.449.0664 www.geosyntec.com

Fox Studios Letter Report Nov 2015 f (002)

3 November 2015

Mr. Bruce Lackow Meridian Consultants, LLC 910 Hampshire Road, Suite V Westlake Village, California 91361 Subject: Evaluation and Summary of Geotechnical and Seismic Hazards Fox Studios Master Plan for the Existing Property 10201 Pico Boulevard Century City, California Geosyntec Project No. HA1556

Dear Mr. Lackow:

Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) is pleased to provide this letter report to Meridian Consultants, LLC (Meridian) detailing the geologic and seismic hazards evaluation for use in preparing the Fox Studios (Fox) Master Plan Initial Study under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Initial Study analysis determines if the proposed changes to Fox’s current zoning classification and the applicable provisions contained in the existing Century City South Specific Plan (the Project) would result in a significant impact to the environment. These services were performed in accordance with our proposal dated 24 November 2014 and the Professional Services Agreement dated 7 October 2015.

This letter report was prepared by Tania Curulla and Jared Warner P.G., and has been reviewed by Steve Fitzwilliam, G.E., in accordance with the peer review policies of Geosyntec.

BACKGROUND

The site is located at 10201 West Pico Boulevard in Century City, California (Figure 1). Site redevelopment will occur on selected portions of the approximately 53-acre property. We understand that the Project includes improvements to the existing Fox Studios, and redevelopment within six on-site areas (Areas A through F). It is also our understanding that the Project may include demolition of existing buildings and construction of new buildings within each area at the site. Project development is limited to Areas A through F, and redevelopment of the property would also enhance pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular access to the site.

Mr. Bruce Lackow 3 November 2015 Page 2


SITE AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS

This letter report evaluates the potential geologic and seismic hazards associated with development of the proposed Project. The evaluation summarizes available geologic and geotechnical background data. Information contained herein is based on the following technical studies previously performed for properties in the vicinity and available online:

• California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1999, “State of California Seismic Hazard Zones. Beverly Hills Quadrangle, Official Map,” released March 25, 1999.

• CDMG, 1998, “Seismic Hazard Evaluation of the Beverly Hills.7.5 Minute Quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California,” Seismic Hazard Zone Report 023, updated Figure 3.5 in 2005.

• CDMG, 1997, “Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California,” Special Publication 117.

• CDMG, 1986, “State of California Special Studies Zones, Beverly Hills Quadrangle, Revised Official Map.”

• California Geological Survey (CGS), 2003, “The Revised 2002 California Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps, June 2003,” Appendix A – 2002 California Fault Parameters.

• Dibblee, T. W., Jr., 1991, "Geologic Map of the Beverly Hills and Van Nuys (South ½) Quadrangles, Los Angeles County, California," Dibblee Geological Foundation Map DF-31, scale 1:24,000.

• Dolan, J. F., Sieh, K., and Rockwell, T. K., 2000a, “Late Quaternary Activity and Seismic Potential of the Santa Monica Fault System, Los Angeles, California,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 10.

• Dolan, J. F., Stevens, D., and Rockwell, T. K., 2000b, "Paleoseismologic Evidence for an Early to Mid-Holocene Age of the Most Recent Surface Fault Rupture on the Hollywood Fault, Los Angeles, California," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 90, p.p. 334-344.

• Historical Aerials, Aerial imagery between 1953 and 2005, www.historicalaerials.com • Los Angeles, City of, 1996, “Safety Element of the General Plan.” • Los Angeles, County of, 2007, “Draft Preliminary General Plan.” • Los Angeles, County of, 1998, "Technical Appendix to the Safety Element of the Los

Angeles County General Plan," Draft Report by Leighton and Associates with Sedway Cooke Associates.

• United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2002, “Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps,” U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-420.

• USGS, 1966, “Beverly Hills 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, California,” Photo revised 1981.



Our knowledge of the site conditions has been developed from a review of the area geology, historical information, and the referenced reports by others within the site vicinity. The following summarizes the regional geology, site conditions, seismic setting, and the regulatory framework pertinent to geotechnical issues affecting the Project.

Regional Geology

The Project site is located within the northwest block of the Los Angeles Basin, south of the Santa Monica Mountains, near the intersection of the Peninsular Ranges and Transverse Ranges geomorphic provinces of southern California. The Peninsular Ranges province is characterized by a series of northwest trending mountains and valleys separated by faults associated with, and subparallel to, the San Andreas Fault system. These rocks were intruded by Cretaceous age (65 million years ago [mya]) granitic basement rocks, also known as the Peninsular Ranges Batholith. The Transverse Ranges are characterized by east-west trending structural features such as the Santa Monica Mountains and the Santa Monica and Hollywood faults. The Santa Monica and Hollywood faults are considered the boundary between these two physiographic provinces near the site area.

The Los Angeles Basin is a northwest-trending alluviated lowland plane filled with think deposits of relatively unconsolidated marine and non-marine sediments bounded by the Santa Monica Mountains to the north, the Elysian, Repetto and Puente Hills to the east, the Santa Ana Mountains and San Joaquin Hills to the south and southeast, and the Pacific Ocean to the west. The relatively flat surface of the Los Angeles Basin slopes gently south, and is interrupted by a locally trending northwest alignment of low hills and mesas to the south and west that extends from Newport Beach northwest to Beverly Hills, and the Palos Verdes peninsula at the southwest extremity.

The Los Angeles Basin began forming during the Late Miocene (approximately 7.2 mya) as a result of subsidence following compressional stresses between the right-oblique Whittier and Palos Verdes fault zones, and the left-oblique Santa Monica fault system [Wright, 1991]. Sedimentary deposits within the Los Angeles Basin range in thickness from approximately 32,000 feet to 35,000 feet south of the site [Yerkes et al., 1965].

Surface Conditions

The project site currently consists of buildings and offices in addition to asphalt paved roads and parking areas. The site is bordered to the west by residential buildings, to the north by West Olympic Boulevard and West Galaxy Way, to east by Avenue of the Stars, and south by West Pico Boulevard. The area is relatively flat-lying, sloping gently south from an elevation of approximately +250 feet Mean Sea Level (ft MSL) to +315 ft MSL [Dibblee, 1991].



Subsurface Conditions

The site subsurface conditions were observed and documented during previous geotechnical investigations [Law/Crandall, 2001 and Metro, 2011]. These explorations indicate that recent (Holocene age) alluvium forms the surficial cover within the site vicinity. The Holocene age materials, where present, are underlain by variably thick, older alluvium deposits of late Pleistocene age underlain by marine and non-marine sediment deposits of the San Pedro Formation and the Fernando Formation at depth. The anticipated geologic materials below the site are described in the following sections.

Recent Alluvium

As described above, recent geologic mapping (Figure 2) describes the site area as underlain by alluvium of Holocene age [Dibblee, 1991]. These younger alluvial fan deposits typically consists of mixtures of brown, soft to stiff silts and clays with loose to moderately dense, poorly consolidated, interlayered silts, clays, and silty sands with some subordinate layers and lenses of gravelly sandy silt and gravelly sand. The thickness of young alluvium deposits within the site vicinity ranges from approximately 5 feet to 15 feet [Metro, 2011].

Older Alluvium/ Lakewood Formation

The older alluvial deposits consist of sediments deposited by former stream and sheet flow that were mainly shed from the Santa Monica Mountains to the north, and thicken to the south and west [Metro, 2011]. Composition of the older alluvial deposits primarily consists of consolidated deposits of interbedded silts, clays, sand, and silty sands, with some clayey sand layers with scattered gravel. Locally deposited hard carbonate layers have been observed ranging from 5 feet to 15 feet in thickness within the site vicinity [Law/Crandall, 2001]. The older alluvial deposits overlie deposits of the late Pleistocene age Lakewood Formation, which are comprised of non-marine and marine sediments. Since the older alluvial deposits and the underlying Lakewood Formation are compositionally similar, and a clear contact between them is difficult to distinguish, they are shown undifferentiated on the geologic map (Figure 2). Based on previous explorations [Law/Crandall, 2001], the older alluvial deposits range in thickness from approximately 50 feet to 85 feet within the site area.

San Pedro Formation

Marine and non-marine deposits of the early Pleistocene age San Pedro Formation unconformably underlie the undifferentiated Older Alluvium/Lakewood Formation at variable depths below the site. The San Pedro Formation consists primarily of light to dark greenish-gray and bluish-gray, fine-grained dense sand and silty sand with few interbeds of medium- to coarse- grained sand and stiff to hard silt layers. Gravelly sand layers and shell fragments at the base of the formation have



been encountered in local areas. Previous investigations suggest the San Pedro Formation ranges in thickness up to 650 feet [Law/Crandall, 2001].

Fernando Formation

The Pliocene age Fernando Formation unconformable underlies the San Pedro Formation at variable depths within the site area. Sedimentary bedrock of the Fernando Formation generally consists of stiff to hard yellowish-brown to olive-gray siltstone and claystone with localized thin sandstone layers. Locally thick intervals of massive silty sandstone have been previously encountered within the site vicinity [Metro, 2011].

Groundwater

Based on previous records, the historic groundwater level at the site is estimated to occur at a depth of approximately 30 to 40 feet below ground surface (ft bgs) [CDMG, 1998, updated 2005]. According to previous investigations in the project vicinity, the groundwater ranged from 25 ft bgs to 45ft bgs [Metro, 2011]. The Project is located within the Santa Monica Hydrologic Sub-area (Basin No. 5.13) of the Los Angeles County Coastal Plain Hydrologic Area (Basin No. 405.10). Shallow groundwater levels are influenced by seasonal rainfall and infiltration in addition to possible nearby groundwater extraction.

Seismic Setting

The tectonic setting of the Los Angeles Basin area is dominated by right-lateral strike-slip faults with a general northwest by southeast trend as a result of the interaction between the Pacific and North American lithospheric plates. Numerous faults in Southern California include active, potentially active, and inactive faults. Division of these major groups are based on criteria by the CDMG for the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Program [Hart, 1999]. By definition, an active fault is one that has had displacement within Holocene time (last 11,000 years). A potentially active fault has demonstrated displacement of Quaternary age deposits (last 1.6 million years). Inactive faults have not exhibited displacement in the last 1.6 million years.

Faults of tectonic significance mapped in the Los Angeles region and the historical earthquake epicenters in the region are presented in Figure 3. These regional faults include the Santa Monica fault zone (SMFZ) to the north and northwest, the Newport-Inglewood fault zone to the east, and the Redondo Canyon and Palos Verdes faults offshore to the west. Faults considered active [Hart, 1999] and their respective distances from the site and maximum moment magnitudes are presented in Table 1.



TABLE 1 - SIGNIFICANT SEISMIC SOURCES WITHIN 100 KM OF PROJECT

Fault or Fault Segment Fault Type 1 Approximate.

Slip Rate (mm/yr) 2

Dip Direction

Approximate Fault Length

(km) 3

Approximate Closest

Distance to Project (km) 4

Approximate Maximum Magnitude

(Mw) 5

Newport-Inglewood (onshore) RL 1.0 - 65 0.20 7.2

Santa Monica O/LL, R 1.0 N 28 0.90 6.6

Hollywood O/LL, R 1.0 N 17 3 6.4

Raymond O/LL, R 1.5 N 22 21 6.8

Malibu Coast O/LL, R 0.3 N 38 37 6.7

Redondo Canyon R 1.0 S 12 19 6.5 Palos Verdes (Santa Monica Basin

ti ) RL 3.0 - 99 19 7.3

Palos Verdes (San Pedro shelf ti )

RL 3.0 - 99 35 7.3

Santa Cruz- Santa Catalina Ridge R-RL 1.0 V 24 68 7.3

San Fernando R 2.0 N 18 27 6.7

Sierra Madre R 2.0 N 57 26 7.2

Verdugo R 0.5 NE 29 18 6.9

Ventura O/LL, R 1.0 N 20 76 6.8

Red Mountain R 2.0 N 39 97 6.8

San Cayetano R 5.0 N 44 49 6.8

Santa Susana R 5.0 N 27 29 6.9

Simi-Santa Rosa R 1.0 N 39 38 6.9

Oak Ridge (onshore) R 4.0 S 50 59 6.9

Javon Canyon R 1.0 N 15 97 6.8

Arroyo Parida R 1.0 S 65 89 6.7

San Gabriel RL 1.0 N 72 40 7.0

Whittier RL 2.5 NE 46 39 7.0

Chino O/RL-R 1.0 NE 28 65 6.9

Elsinore (Glen Ivy section) RL 5.0 V 38 77 6.8

Santa Cruz Island RL 1.0 V 69 84 7.2 Coronado Bank

(P l V d ti ) RL 3.0 V 24 63 7.4

Cucamonga R 5.0 N 28 68 7.0 San Jacinto (San Bernardino section) RL 12.0 V 35 87 6.7

San Andreas (Mojave section) RL 30.0 V 99 61 7.1 Garlock (west branch) LL 6.0 V 97 98 7.1

Cabrillo (offshore) RL 1.0 E 10 40 6.8 Notes: “-“ - Unspecified 1 - RL = Right Lateral Strike-Slip Fault; LL = Left Lateral Strike-Slip Fault; O/LL = Oblique Left-Lateral Fault; R = Reverse Fault 2 - Approximate Slip Rate milometers per year (mm/yr) obtained from CGS (2003) and USGS (2008) 3 - Fault Length obtained from CGS (2003) and USGS (2008) 4 - Distances from Project noted are the closest distances to the surface trace or inferred projection of the fault as measured from the

CDMG (1998), CGS (2003), or USGS (2008) 5 - Maximum Earthquake values reported at maximum moment magnitude by the CGS (2003) and USGS (2008)



Active Faults

Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone

The Newport-Inglewood fault zone is the closest major active fault to the Project, located approximately 0.12 miles (0.2 km) east of the site. The Newport-Inglewood fault zone is composed of a series of discontinuous northwest trending en echelon faults extending from Ballona Gap southeast to the area offshore of Newport Beach. This zone is reflected at the surface by a line of geomorphically young anticlinal hills and mesas formed by the folding and faulting of a thick sequence of Pleistocene age sediments and Tertiary age sedimentary rocks [Barrows, 1974]. Historical seismic activity (between 1977 and 1985) shows mostly strike-slip faulting with some reverse faulting along the northern segment (north of Dominguez Hills), and normal faulting along the southern segment (south of Dominguez Hills to Newport Beach) [Hauksson, 1987].

Santa Monica Fault Zone

The SMFZ is considered a continuous zone comprised of five fault segments including the Malibu Coast, Santa Monica, Hollywood, and Raymond faults, with a total length of approximately 150 miles (Dolan et al., 2000a). The SMFZ exhibits both reverse and left-lateral components of slip, and is located approximately 0.5 mile (0.9 km) north of the project site (Figure 3). The SMFZ extends 25 miles from the western edge of Beverly Hills across West Los Angeles and Santa Monica to Pacific Palisades, where it trends offshore and parallels the Malibu coast near Point Dume. The SMFZ extends eastward as the Hollywood fault along the base of the Santa Monica Mountains from the West Beverly Hills Lineament in the West Hollywood-Beverly Hills area, to the Los Feliz area of Los Angeles. Although the Santa Monica and Hollywood faults are considered active, these segments have not yet been included in a State of California Special Studies Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (A-P Zone). The site is not included in a City of Los Angeles Fault Rupture Study Area (City of Los Angeles, 1996). The active Hollywood fault trends east-west along the southern boundary of the Santa Monica Mountains, located approximately 1.9 miles (3 km) north and northeast of the site (Figure 3).

Malibu Coast Fault Zone

The Malibu Coast fault zone, located approximately 23 miles (37 km) west to southwest of the site, trends east-west exhibiting north-dipping reverse slip. Splays of the Malibu Coast fault zone has produced seismic activity in the last 11,000 years and is considered active.



Blind Thrust Fault Zones

Blind thrust fault zones are considered active features that do not rupture at the ground surface. Although these features present risk by generating intense shaking, blind thrust faults within the Los Angeles region are not listed in Table 1 due to the uncertainty in their vertical surface projection. Known blind thrust faults within the site vicinity along with their respective slip rates and maximum moment magnitudes are described below.

Elysian Park Thrust

The Elysian Park Thrust, previously defined as the Elysian Park Fold and Thrust Belt [Hauksson, 1990], is a blind thrust fault that overlies the Los Angeles and Santa Fe Springs segments of the Puente Hills Thrust (Oskin et al., 2000 and Shaw et al., 2002). The eastern edge of the Elysian Park Thrust is defined by the northwest-trending Whittier fault zone. The vertical surface projection of the Elysian Park Thrust is approximately 11 miles southeast of the site. Like other blind thrust faults in the Los Angeles area, the Elysian Park Thrust is not exposed at the surface and does not present a potential surface rupture hazard; however, should be considered an active feature capable of generating future earthquakes. An average slip rate of 1.3 mm/yr and a maximum moment magnitude (M, defined as a measurement of the size of an earthquake in terms of energy released) M 6.4 were estimated for the Elysian Park Thrust [CGS, 2003].

Compton-Los Alamitos Thrust

The Compton-Los Alamitos Thrust is an inferred blind thrust fault located within the south-central portion of the Los Angeles Basin. The closest edge of the vertical surface projection of the buried thrust fault is located approximately 10 miles south of the site. Like other blind thrust faults in the Los Angeles Area, the Compton-Los Alamitos Thrust is not exposed at the surface and does not present a potential surface rupture hazard; however, should be considered an active feature capable of generating future earthquakes. An average slip rate of 1.5 mm/yr and a maximum moment magnitude M 6.8 were estimated for the Compton-Los Alamitos Thrust [CGS, 2003].

Puente Hills Blind Thrust

The Puente Hills Blind Thrust fault (PHBT) system extends eastward from downtown Los Angeles to Brea in northern Orange County. The PHBT is comprised of three north-dipping segments overlain by folds expressed at the surface as the Coyote Hills, Santa Fe Springs Anticline, and the Montebello Hills. The PHBT exhibits an estimated average slip rate of 0.7 mm/year [CGS, 2003]. Postulated earthquake scenarios for the PHBT include a single segment rupture of a magnitude M 6.6, and a multiple segment rupture producing an earthquake of M



7.1. The PHBT is not exposed at the ground surface and does not present a potential for surface fault rupture. However, based on deformation of late Quaternary age sediments above this fault system and the occurrence of the Whittier Narrows earthquake, the PHBT is considered an active fault capable of generating future earthquakes beneath the Los Angeles Basin.

Potentially Active Faults

Overland Fault

The Overland fault located approximately 1.3 miles (2 km) southwest of the site is considered potentially active (Figure 2). The Overland fault trends northwest between the Charnock fault and the Newport-Inglewood fault zone, extending from the northwest flank of the Baldwin Hills to Santa Monica Boulevard in the vicinity of Overland Avenue. However, there is no evidence of that the fault has offset late Pleistocene or Holocene age alluvial deposits [County of Los Angeles Seismic Safety Element, 1990] and is considered potentially active by the State Geologist [Jennings, 1994].

Charnock Fault

The potentially active Charnock fault is located approximately 3.8 miles (6 km) southwest of the site. The Charnock fault trends northwest-southeast subparallel to the Newport-Inglewood fault zone and the Overland fault. No recent evidence suggests the fault has offset late Pleistocene or Holocene age alluvial deposits [County of Los Angeles Seismic Safety Element, 1990] and is considered potentially active by the State Geologist [Jennings, 1994].

GEOLOGIC HAZARDS

The hazards generally associated with seismic activity include fault rupture, seismic ground shaking, liquefaction, seismically induced settlement, tsunamis, and landsliding. These potential seismic hazards are discussed in the following sections. The conclusions and discussion below are based on the review of available geologic literature, previous investigations by others, and geologic interpretation of the site-specific subsurface information.

Fault Rupture

Fault rupture hazard was evaluated to assess the exposure to people or structures to substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death. The potential for fault surface rupture is generally considered to be significant along “active” faults (defined as exhibiting surface rupture within the past 11,000 years) and to a lesser degree along “potentially active” faults (surface rupture within the past 1.6 million years). Mapped active faults do not cross the site and, therefore, fault rupture hazard would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are required.



The property does not lie within the boundaries of an "Earthquake Fault Zone" as defined by the State of California in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Zoning Act. The closest A-P Zone to the site has been established for a portion of the Newport-Inglewood fault zone located southeast of the site. At its closest point, this A-P Zone is located approximately 2 miles to the southeast of the site. Therefore, performance of a site-specific fault-hazard evaluation in accordance with the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act would not be required.

Ground Shaking

The site is situated within a seismically active region and will likely experience moderate to severe ground shaking in response to a large-magnitude earthquake occurring on a local or more distant active fault during the expected lifespan of the site. The potential for significant seismically induced ground shaking in response to an earthquake occurring along a nearby active fault, such as the SMFZ, or a regional fault, such as the San Andreas fault zone, is relatively high within the site area.

The potential for strong seismic shaking is considered high; however, with site specific investigation and standard site design features addressing seismic shaking, this hazard would not be likely to represent a significant or substantially adverse hazard.

Based on the 2010 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Standard ASCE/SEI 7 and the 2012 International Building Code (IBC), the site is classified as Site Class D (stiff soil). The seismic hazard parameters for the Site using the USGS Seismic Design Maps tool are summarized in Table 2.



TABLE 2 - SEISMIC HAZARD PARAMETERS

Parameter Value Site Soil Class D Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at 0.2s Period, SS 2.18 g Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at 1.0s Period, S1 0.81 g Short Period Site Coefficient at 0.2s Period, Fa 1.00 Long Period Site Coefficient at 1.0s Period, Fv 1.50 Adjusted Spectral Response Acceleration at 0.2s Period, SMS 2.18 g Adjusted Spectral Response Acceleration at 1.0s Period, SM1 1.21 g Design Spectral Response Acceleration at 0.2s Period, SDS 1.45 g Design Spectral Response Acceleration at 1.0s Period, SD1 0.81 g PGA (2% in 50 years) 0.82 g

Note: Seismic hazard parameters are based on ASCE/SEI 7 Standard and the 2012 IBC.

It is incumbent upon the Structural Engineer retained for this project to verify the above-listed seismic parameters at the time of application. Foundation structures shall be designed to accommodate seismically induced ground motions in accordance with the California Building Code.

Liquefaction Potential

Seismically induced liquefaction is a phenomenon in which saturated soils lose a significant portion of their strength and acquire some mobility from seismic shaking or other large cyclic loading. The material types considered most susceptible to liquefaction are granular and low-plasticity fine grained soils which are saturated and loose to medium dense. A rapid increase in groundwater pressures (excess pore water pressures) causes the loss of soil strength.

Manifestations of soil liquefaction can include sand boils, surface settlements and tilting in level ground, lateral spreading, and global instability (flow slides) in areas of sloping ground. The impact of liquefaction on structures can include loss of bearing capacity, drag loads on deep foundations, liquefaction-induced total and differential settlement, and increased lateral and uplift pressures on buried structures. Other factors such as soil mineralogy, void ratio, overconsolidation ratio, and age are contributing factors to liquefaction susceptibility. In general, the older or denser a deposit, the less susceptible it is to liquefaction.

According to the CDMG (1999), the City of Los Angeles Safety Element (1996), and the County of Los Angeles Seismic Safety Element (1990), the Project is not located within areas identified as having a potential for liquefaction. Additionally, based on a review of the regional



geologic map and subsurface conditions reported in previous geotechnical investigations, and the absence of shallow groundwater, the Pleistocene age sediments underlying the site (generally dense silty sand and firm silty clay silts) are not considered prone to liquefaction. Therefore, the potential for liquefaction and its secondary effects are considered low. Thus, a site-specific study in accordance with the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act is not required.

Slope Stability

Given the topographic setting and a review of previous geotechnical evaluations in the project vicinity, no landslides exist at the site or in an area that could potentially impact the Project. The site is located within the City of Los Angeles “Hillside Grading Area” and the County of Los Angeles “Landslide Inventory Study Area” due to its location along the base of the Beverly Hills. The site is not located with the City of Los Angeles “Hillside Ordinance Area.” The pre-graded topography of the site appears to be relatively flat with no significant slopes (aerial photos). The site is not located within an area that is identified as having a potential for seismic slope instability.

Flooding

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) presents the flood hazard potential in the vicinity of the project areas as part of their Flood Insurance Rate Maps. FEMA Map No. 06037C1595F, dated 26 September 2008 [FEMA, 2008], indicates that the site is located in an un-shaded Zone X which is defined as “areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance flood plain”. Due to a lack of any reservoirs up gradient from the sites, flooding as a result of dam failure is not considered to be a viable hazard. Based on our review of the FEMA mapping, the geologic setting, and the site elevations, the potential for flooding at the site is very low.

Other Geologic Hazards

The presence of potentially expansive clayey soil was not observed in the previous explorations performed within the proximity of the Project. Given the underlying geologic conditions within the area, typically a sandy soil, we do not anticipate expansive soils to be encountered within the limits of the site. However, if expansive soils are encountered during the proposed grading, we recommend that these materials should be removed, mixed with non-expansive soils, or segregated and stockpiled for potential use as low permeable materials during grading. It is unlikely that expansive soil will be encountered; therefore, expansive soil does not constitute a significant hazard at the site if appropriate grading practices are maintained.

Other potential geologic hazards evaluated which could possibly affect the site include slope instability, floods, seiches, and tsunamis. The site is relatively flat, and new slopes, if proposed



at the site, will be engineered slopes designed at stable inclinations. Therefore, slope instability is not considered a hazard. Tsunamis are seismically induced waves generated by sudden movements of the ocean bottom during submarine earthquakes, landslides or volcanic activity. Seiches are similarly generated but are oscillating waves within bodies of water such as reservoirs, lakes or bays. The site is not located within the County of Los Angeles mapped tsunami run-up zone [CGS, 2009]. Similarly, potential seiche inundation would not likely exceed the extent of tsunami run up. Based on the physiographic setting of the site, the distance to the ocean or other large water bodies, and the elevation of the site, it is our opinion that the potential for flooding from seismically induced seiches and tsunamis is very low.

CEQA IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA

According to CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, the Project would have a significant impact from geology and soils if it will:

1) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: a) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated in the most recent Alquist-

Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known potentially active fault (Refer to CDGM Special Publication 42);

b) Strong seismic ground shaking; c) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; and d) Landslides;

2) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil; 3) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable

as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse; or

4) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (UBC, 1994), creating substantial risks to life or property.

Based on previous investigations and available geologic data, active faults with the potential for surface fault rupture are not mapped or known to exist beneath or projecting toward the site. The potential for surface rupture at the site due to faulting at the ground surface during the design life of the proposed development is considered low. Although the site could be subjected to strong ground shaking in the event of an earthquake, this hazard is common in Southern California and the effects of ground shaking can be mitigated by proper engineering design and construction in conformance with current building codes and engineering practices.



MITIGATION MEASURES

Based on previous investigations and geotechnical recommendations provided for the various projects in the vicinity of Fox Studios, mitigation measures that would reduce the impacts associated with fault hazards, including strong ground motions and surface rupture to a less than significant level may include, but are not necessarily limited to the measures listed below.

Submittal of a detailed site specific geotechnical evaluation prepared by a qualified geotechnical engineer, including subsurface exploration and laboratory testing, for the development of design and construction recommendations, for the proposed development. The geotechnical design report shall be submitted to the City of Los Angeles for approval providing site-specific measures to be implemented. As applicable, these measures shall include:

• Conformance with the current building design and structural requirements of the UBC to minimize potential damage during earthquakes.

• Conformance with the seismic safety requirements in the City of Los Angeles Municipal Code.

• Conformance with the Los Angeles General Plan Safety Element. • Conformance with the City of Los Angeles Contents of Reports for Submittal to the

Grading Section for soils and geology reports.

Construction

A qualified geotechnical engineer shall provide in a report project specific geologic and geotechnical recommendations. The geotechnical engineer shall oversee the construction activities including grading and general site preparation activities to monitor the implementation of the recommendations as specified in the geotechnical investigation. With implementation of the recommended mitigation above, potential impacts associated with geology and soils would be reduced to a less than significant level.



Geosyntec appreciates this opportunity to prepare this letter report for Meridian Consultants, LLC. If you have any questions or require additional information regarding the findings presented herein, please contact the undersigned at (858) 716-2904.

Sincerely,

Geosyntec Consultants

Steven M. Fitzwilliam, G.E. 2501 Jared Warner, P.G. 9238 Senior Consultant Project Geologist

Tania Curulla, E.I.T. Engineer

Attachments: Figure 1 – Site Location Figure 2 – Geologic Map Figure 3 – Historical Earthquake Epicenter Map


REFERENCES

Barrows, A.G., 1974. “A Review of the Geology and Earthquake history of the Newport Inglewood Structural Zone,” CDMG, Special Report 114, 115 pp.

CDMG, 1999. “State of California Seismic Hazard Zones. Beverly Hills Quadrangle, Official Map,” released 25 March 1999.

CDMG, 1998. “Seismic Hazard Evaluation of the Beverly Hills.7.5 Minute Quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California,” Seismic Hazard Zone Report 023, updated Figure 3.5 in 2005.

CDMG, 1997, “Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California,” Special Publication 117.

CDMG, 1986. “State of California Special Studies Zones, Beverly Hills Quadrangle, Revised Official Map.”

CGS, 2009. “Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning State of California, County of Los Angeles, Beverly Hills Quadrangle,” 1 March 2009.

CGS, 2003. “California Probabilistic Seismic Hazards Appendix A 2002 California Fault Parameters”, 2002 Revisions to Open File Report OFR 96-08 CGS, dated June 2003.

Dibblee, T. W., Jr., 1991, "Geologic Map of the Beverly Hills and Van Nuys (South ½) Quadrangles, Los Angeles County, California," Dibblee Geological Foundation Map DF 31, scale 1:24,000.

Dolan, J. F., Sieh, K., and Rockwell, T. K., 2000a, “Late Quaternary Activity and Seismic Potential of the Santa Monica Fault System, Los Angeles, California,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 10.

Dolan, J. F., Stevens, D., and Rockwell, T. K., 2000b, "Paleoseismologic Evidence for an Early to Mid-Holocene Age of the Most Recent Surface Fault Rupture on the Hollywood Fault, Los Angeles, California," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 90, p.p. 334-344.

FEMA, 2008. Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 06073C1595F, 26 September, 2008. Hart, E.W., 1973, revised 1997. “Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Fault Zone Maps,” CDMG Special Publication 42.

Hart, E.W., 1973, revised 1999. “Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California,” CDMG, Special Publication 42.

Hauksoon, E., 1990. “Earthquakes, Faulting, and Stress in the Los Angeles Basin,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 95, No. B10, pp. 15,653-15,394.

Hauksson, E., 1987. “Seismotectonics of the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone in the Los Angeles Basin, Southern California,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 77, pp. 539-561.


Historical Aerials, Aerial imagery between 1953 and 2015, www.historicalaerials.com Jennings, C.W., 1994. “Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas with

Locations and Ages of Recent Volcanic Eruptions,” CDMG Map No. 6. Law/Crandall, 2001, “Report of Geologic-Seismic Hazards Evaluation for

Environmental Impact Report – Proposed High-Rise Office Building and Retail Development, 2000 Avenue of the Stars, Century City District of Los Angeles, California,” 13 November 2001.

Los Angeles, City of, 1996, “Safety Element of the General Plan.” Los Angeles, County of, 2007, “Draft Preliminary General Plan.” Los Angeles, County of, 1990, "Technical Appendix to the Safety Element of the Los

Angeles County General Plan," Draft Report by Leighton and Associates with Sedway Cooke Associates.

Metro, 2011. “Westside Subway Extension Project – Preliminary Geotechnical Report, Volume 1, Part 1 of 2.

Oskin, M., Sieh, K., Rockwell, T., Miller, G., Guptill, P., Curtis, M., McArdle, S., and Elliot, P., 2000. “Active Parasitic Folds on the Elysian Park Anticline: Implications for Seismic Hazard in Central Los Angeles, California,” Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, Vol. 112, No. 5, 693-707.

Shaw, J.H., Plesch, A., Dolan, J.F., Pratt, T.L., and Fiore, P., 2002. “Puente Hills Blind-Thrust System, Los Angeles, California,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 92, No. 8, pp. 2946-2960.

USGS, 2008. “National Seismic Hazard Maps – Source Parameters,” USGS Website accessed October 2015. http://geohazards.usgs.gov/cfusion/hazfaults_search/hf_search_main.cfm, accessed October 2015.

USGS, 2002, “Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps,” USGS Open-File Report 02-420.

USGS, 1966, “Beverly Hills 7 .5-Minute Quadrangle, California,” Photo revised 1981. Wright, T.L., 1991. “Structural Geology and Tectonic Evolution of the Los Angeles

Basin, California,” American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 52, p. 35-134.

Yerkes, R.F., McCulloh, T.H, Schoellhamer, J.E., and Vedder, J.G., 1965. “Geology of the Los Angeles Basin California – An Introduction,” USGS Professional Paper, 420-A.


FIGURES

Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment PCorp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom,MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community

_̂

Site LocationFox Studios Master Plan

10201 Pico BlvdCentury City, California

Figure1

San Diego November 2015

2,000 0 2,0001,000 Feet

£

Area DetailedAbove

Site

P:\G

IS\F

oxS

tudio

s\F

oxS

tudio

Site

Lo

ca

tion

.mxd

,Na

me


Santa Monica fault

1,000 0 1,000500 Feet

£

Geologic Map Fox Studios Master Plan


Figure2


Geologic Base Map Source: American Association of Petroleum Geologist.Dibblee, T.W., and Ehrenspeck, H.E., ed.,Geologic map of the Beverly Hills and Van Nuys (south 1/2) quadrangles, Los Angeles County, California.

Fault

Site Boundary

Oil Field Boundary

Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment PCorp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, OrdnanceSurvey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (HongKong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, ©OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GISUser Community

!?

!?!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?!?

!?

!?!?

!?

!?!?!?!?

!?

!?

!? !?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?!?

!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

!?!?

!?!?

!?

!?

!?!?

!?!?!?

!?!?!?

!?

!?!?!?

!?!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?!?!?!?!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?!?

!?

!?!?!?!?

!?

!?

!?!?

!?!?!?

!?!?

!?!?!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?!?!?

!?

!?

!?!?!?

!?

!?

!?!?!?!?!?

!?

!?

!?!?!?

!?

!?

!?!?

!?

!?!?!?

!?

!?

!?!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?!?

!?

!?

!?!?!?

!?

!?!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?!?!?

!?!?

!?

!?

!?!?

!? !?

!?!?

!?!?

!?!? !?

!?

!?

!?!?

!?!?

!(

Cleveland NF

Cabrillo NMON

10 0 10 20 305 Kilometers

£

ESRI_StreetMap_World_2D

100 Kilometer Radius

Sierra Madre Fault Zone

San Andreas Fault Zone

Elsinore Fault Zone

San Gabriel Fault Zone

Santa Cruz Island Fault

San Clemente

Fault Zone

Site Location

Fault

!?

!?

4.0 - 4.99

5.0 - 5.99

6.0 - 6.6

Data Source: Southern California Earthquake Data Center

Image Source: ArcOnline NGS_Topo_US_2D

Reported Earthquake Magnitudes 1937 - 2015

!?

Historical Earthquake Epicenter MapFox Studios Master Plan


Figure3


San Cayetano Fault

Malibu Coast Fault

Santa Monica Fault

Raymond Fault

Santa Cruz Santa Catalina

Ridge fault zone

!(

Palos V

erdes Fau

lt Zo

ne


APPENDIX E List of Related Cases

APPENDIX E

Fox Studios List of Related Cases City Planning Commission CPC-1992-536-DA

City Planning Commission CPC-1992-525-ZC-GPC-MPR

City Planning Commission CPC-1988-567

City Planning Commission CPC-1985-88-PA

City Planning Commission CPC-1985-660

City Planning Commission CPC-1985-285-ZC

City Planning Commission CPC-1978-79-P

Ordinance ORD-183497



Ordinance ORD-168862-SAB






Director of Planning DIR-2011-1755-SPP

Zoning Administration ZAI-1978-79-P

Zoning Administration ZAI-1978-79

Zoning Administration ZA-2014-3552-ZV

Zoning Administration ZA-1988-960

Zoning Administration ZA-1986-1169-R

Zoning Administration ZA-15276

Subdivision/PM Case AA-2012-889-WTM

Subdivision/PM Case COC-84-62

Subdivision/PM Case PPM-5290

Environmental ENV-2014-3553-CE



Environmental ENV-1990-771-EIR

Environmental Case EIR-77-284-SP

Environmental Case EIR-80-827-GP

appendix a tree report - la city planning · avenue d ninth street eighth street seventh street...

Documents