aosa/scst region 2 virtual soybean seedling …...• seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was...

15
AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling Evaluation Referee 2009-2010

Upload: others

Post on 12-Aug-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

AOSA/SCST Region 2

Virtual Soybean Seedling

Evaluation Referee

2009-2010

Page 2: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

Background Information

• Second year of soybean virtual referee.• Was proceeded by three years of virtual corn referees.• Participating Labs (no particular order):

– McKenzie Seeds (Manitoba) - Virginia Dept. of Ag– USDA (North Carolina) - Washington Dept. of Ag– Texas Dept. of Ag - Michigan Crop Improvement– New Mexico Dept. of Ag - Minnesota Dept. of Ag– Germain’s Seeds (California) - BioDiagnostics (Wisconsin)– Syngenta (Colorado) - Kansas Crop Improvement– Harris Seeds (New York) - Iowa State University– Pioneer (Indiana, Iowa) - MD Seed Analysis (California)– Seminis (California) - Advanta (Texas)– Agri-Quality Testing (Washington)

Page 3: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

Background Information

• Seedlings were grown on crepe cellulose paper (Kimpak™, VersaPak™)

• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used).

• Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST labs. Differences according to organization weren’t necessarily expected, but it was interesting to see if there were differences.

• In the corn virtual referees, participant responses were divided by experience.

• Volume Four of the AOSA Rules for Testing Seeds is up for revision. Hopefully all interested parties will contribute to the revised “Seedling Evaluation” section of the AOSA Rules.

• Past virtual referees can be found on the AOSA and SCST web sites.

• On seedlings when the responses approach 50 – 50, who decides if the seedling is normal or abnormal?

Page 4: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

2

1All AOSA SCST

27% 32% 22%Number calling seedling normal

All AOSA SCST

19% 16% 22%

Page 5: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

4

3

All AOSA SCST

84% 79% 89%

All AOSA SCST

79% 79% 78%

Page 6: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

5

6All AOSA SCST

68% 68% 67%

All AOSA SCST

8% 16% 0%

Page 7: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

7

8

All AOSA SCST

81% 84% 78%

All AOSA SCST

24% 32% 17%

Page 8: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

9

10

All AOSA SCST

60% 53% 67%

All AOSA SCST

49% 47% 50%

Page 9: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

11

12 All AOSA SCST

24% 26% 22%

All AOSA SCST

100% 100% 100%

Page 10: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

13

14

All AOSA SCST

100% 100% 100%

All AOSA SCST

73% 58% 89%

Page 11: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

15

16

All AOSA SCST

78% 84% 72%

All AOSA SCST

51% 63% 39%

Page 12: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

18

17

All AOSA SCST

32% 37% 39%

All AOSA SCST

3% 5% 0%

Page 13: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

19

2Ne

20

All AOSA SCST

41% 37% 44%All AOSA SCST

95% 100% 89%

Page 14: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

21

22

All AOSA SCST

84% 95% 72%

All AOSA SCST

27% 16% 39%

Page 15: AOSA/SCST Region 2 Virtual Soybean Seedling …...• Seedlings were scanned (a digital camera was not used). • Responses from participants were divided as coming from AOSA or SCST

Thank you to all who participated!

Please contact Mike Stahr with questions and comments about this year’s referee.

Please submit suggestions for future virtual referees and for changes to the AOSA Seedling Evaluation Handbook

[email protected], 515-294-0117