aorto-iliac interventions

35
Aorto-iliac Interventions Levent Oguzkurt, MD Baskent University School of Medicine Section of Interventional Radiology Adana, Turkey

Upload: pairs-pan-arab-interventional-radiology-societ

Post on 17-Jan-2017

249 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Aorto-iliac InterventionsLevent Oguzkurt, MD

Baskent University School of MedicineSection of Interventional Radiology

Adana, Turkey [email protected]

Page 2: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Disclosure

I have the following potential conlict of interests to report

Consultant: BARD, Covidien

Page 3: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Surgical treatment: Aortoiliac bypass

• Patency – 82-91% at 5 years– 76-80% at 10 years

• Mortality: 3-4% at 30 days• Complications up to 21%

TASC ll

Page 4: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS
Page 5: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Type of obstructive lesions– Stenoses

• High technical success– Chronic occlusions

• Technical failures – Acute/chronic thrombosis

• Complications

Methods of treatment – PTA – Bare metal stents

– Self-expanding– Balloon-expanding

– Covered stents – Thrombectomy/thrombolysis

Objectives of endovascular treatment • High technical/clinical success• Low complications • High patency rates on short and long term

Page 6: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

OBSTRUCTIONS INVOLVING THE AORTA

Page 7: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Aorto-iliac occlusion (TASC D) • 3%-8% of aortoiliac occlusive disease• Distal type/proximal (complete) type

• High technical failures • High complication rates • Requirement for thrombus removal• Low primary and secondary patency • 20 patients • Primary patency 66% @ 2 years

Yuan L, et al. J Vasc Surg 2014 59:663-8

Page 8: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Isolated aortic stenosis (TASC B) Localized form (normal iliacs) Diffuse form

Page 9: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Isolated aortic stenosis

De vries JPP, et al. J Vasc Surg 2004 39:427-34

• 69 patient • PTA with provisional stenting

(24 stent placement)• Technical success: 98%• No major complications• 5 year patency patency:

• Primary: 75%• Secondary patency: 96%

• PTA vs stent: No difference

Page 10: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Aortic stenosis with or without iliac artery involvementAdana Baskent Experience

• 40 patients (80% men); mean age, 59 years• 38 stenoses, 2 occlusions (iliac)• 18 patients aortic stenoses alone (localized/diffuse)• Mostly direct stenting (32 patients)• Technical success: 100%• Complications: 6/40 (15%)• Follow up: 1-72 months (median 24 months)• Patency at 3 years: 100% for aortic stenosis alone• Long term mortality higher in isolated aortic lesions

Page 11: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

ILIAC ARTERY OBSTRUCTIONS

Page 12: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

10 year patency after iliac a. stent placement• 110 patients (mean age 57 years)• 126 iliac lesion – 66 stenoses (PTA with provisional stent) – 60 occlusions (direct stent placement)

• Walstents• Primary/secondary patency (stent group) – 66%/79% @ 5 years – 46%/55% @ 10 years

• Survival – 83% after 5 years– 64% after 10 years

Schürmann K et al. Radiology 2002;224:731-8

Page 13: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Dutch iliac stent trial • RCT • 279 patients (mean age, 58 years)

– PTA with selective stenting 136 pts – Stent placement 143 pts

• Iliac stenosis or short (<5 cm) occlusion• PTA with selective stent placement group had better

improvement clinically• ABI, iliac patency, score for quality of life were similar• Patency at a follow up of 6.3 years (0.7-8.6 years)

– PTA with selective stent placement: 74%– Stent placement: 83%

• Stent+selective stent vs PTA alone: No difference Klein WEM, et al Radiology 2006 238:734-44

Page 14: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Primary stenting (vs PTA with provisional stenting)

• Direct stenting 110 patient• PTA with provisional stenting 41 patients

• Reduced perioperative complications (2.7% vs 24%)• Higher clinical success for longer stenosis (TASC C-D)• Similar clinical success on long term • Patency at 5 years – Similar for short stenosis – Higher with primary stenting for long segment occlusions

AbuRahma AF, J Vasc Surg 2007 46:965-70

Page 15: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

STent versus AnGioplasty (STAG) • Multicenter RCT • Only technically successful cases were randomized• Patency: Presence of flow (at 1 and 2 years)• Planned recruitmen 144 patients• Trial halted after 118 patients

Goode SD, et al. Br J Surg 2013 100:1148-53

Page 16: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

STent versus AnGioplasty (STAG)

Goode SD, et al. Br J Surg 2013 100:1148-53

• Multicenter RCT • Only technically successful cases were randomized• Patency: Presence of flow (at 1 and 2 years)• Planned recruitmen 144 patients• Trial halted after 118 patients

Page 17: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

(COBEST trial)

• Multicenter RCT– Covered stents (n=83 iliacs)– Bare metal stents (n=85 iliacs)

• Longest follow up 18 months • Restenoses (CI: 0.15-0.82)

– 8 in covered stent group– 20 in BMS group

• Complete occlusion (CI: 0.07-1.09)

– 3 in covered stent group – 10 in BMS group

• Less re-intervention in the covered stent group

Bibombe P, et al. J Vasc Surg 2011 54:1561-70TASC C&D

Page 18: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Extensive iliac artery occlusions • TASC C and D• 19 studies, 1329 patients• Technical success: 86%-100%• Clinical improvement: 83%-100%• Length of hospitalization: 1-4.8

days• 5 year patency (8 studies)

– Primary patency: 60%-86%– Secondary patency: 80%-98%

• Mortality: 0-6.7%– 0% mortality in 12 studies– 1.2%-6.7% in 7 studies

• Morbidity: 3%-45%

• Most common complications: – Access site hematoma– Distal embolization– Arterial dissection – Pseudoaneurysm– Iliac artery or aortic rupture

Jongkind V J et al. Vasc Surg 2010 52:1376-83

Page 19: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Adana Baskent University experience• 127 chronic iliac a. occlusions in 118 patients• Direct stent placement in all• Technical success: 117/127 (92%)• Complications

– Major 22 pts (19%)– Minor 7 pts (6%)

• Mortality 1 patient• Primary patency at 5 years: 63%• Secondary patentcy at 5 years: 93%

Ozkan U, Oguzkurt L. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 2010 33:18-24

Page 20: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

90%

50%

Page 21: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS
Page 22: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS
Page 23: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Chronic iliac artery occlusions

127 iliac a. (2001-2008)

104 iliac a. (2008-2013)

P value

Number of patients 118 93

Technical success 92% 99% <0.01

Patency @3 years(primary/secondary)

63%/93% 60%/95% >0.05

ComplicationsMajorMinor

24%19%6%

15%9%6%

<0.01

*Published data Unpublished data

Influence of increased experience

*Ozkan U, Oguzkurt L. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 2010 33:18-24

Page 24: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

ENDOVASCULAR vs BYPASS

Page 25: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Open bypass Endovascular P

No of patients 3733 1625

Hospital stay (mean, days) 13 4 <0.001

Complications 18% 13% <0.001

30-day mortality 2.6% 0.7% <0.001

Primary patency @5 years 94.8% 80% <0.001

Secondary patency@5 years 95.7% 90% <0.001

Page 26: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

RESTENOSIS

Page 27: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS
Page 28: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Risk factors for aortoiliac PTA/stent restenosis

• Occlusion length • Number of stents placed (occlusion length)• Small-diameter artery • Younger age (small artery?)• CLI (vs claudication)• Poor distal runoff• Stent in the external iliac artery • Female gender (small artery?)• Comorbidities (DM or chr. renal insufficiency)

Page 29: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS
Page 30: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS
Page 31: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

• 102 recurrence out of 937 patients• Recurrent procedures:

– Higher morbidity during intervention – Lower clinical success– Lower 5-10 years patency

• Primary/secondary patency @ 10 years • 73%/90% (index procedure) • 66%/78% (recurrent procedure)

Davies MG, et al J Endovasc Ther 2011 18:169-180

Primary patency Secondary patency

• 84 iliac in-stent stenosis (BMS) – 61 stenoses– 23 occlusions

• Primary/secondary patency @ 5 years 38%/63%

Kropman RHJ et al EJVES, 2006; 32:634-8

PTA/stent for iliac in-stent restenosis

Page 32: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Cutting balloon for ISR• 14 patients • 9 focal, 4 diffuse, 1 extended outside the stent

margin • Patency 100% (mean follow up of 24 months)

with CDUS

Tsetis D, et al. J Endovasc Ther 2008 15(2):193-202

Page 33: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Direct stenting

• Reduced risk of rupture• Reduced distal embolism• Reduced overall

complications • Higher short term patency

PTA with provisional stenting

• Low short-term patency • Low/Similar long-term

patency • High complication • Nothing left behind

Direct stent placement recommended: – Aortoiliac junction (esp. balloon-expanding)– Heavy calcification (esp. balloon-expanding) – Iliac occlusions

Page 34: AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS

Endovascular treatment of aortoiliac disease…..• High rate of technical success • Low morbidity, low mortality • Success has been limited by – Technical failures (occlusions) – Acute stent thrombosis (infrequent)– Restenosis on short and long term

• Stents/covered stents have higher short-term success• Drug-eluting balloons/stents are waited