answers to xugf’s questions cj -> kk liang yan 11-11-2013

14
Answers to Xugf’s questions c cj ->fKKp Liang Yan 11-11-2013

Upload: jacob-anderson

Post on 20-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

Answers to Xugf’s questionsccj->fKKp

Liang Yan11-11-2013

Page 2: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

Question 1

• The systematic error for N>=6 should be considered

• A: I change to N>=6 to N=6 to get the branching fractions, and take the difference as the contribution of N>=6.

Page 3: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

By comparing the multiplicity of charged tracks, the systematic error is about 0.04%. Considering the small uncertainty, loose vertex cut for selection of Ks, we still use the the criteria nGood>=6.

Page 4: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

Question 2

• You should give a weighted average for the TRK and PID instead to say 1% and 2% per track simply.

• A: Yes, TRK and PID for kaon are 1.58% and 2.23%. For Pion, we use 1% for TRK and PID as a conservative estimation

Page 5: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

Kaon tracking

Page 6: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

Kaon PID

Page 7: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

Pion tracking

Page 8: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

Pion PID

Page 9: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

Question 3

• ccjLineshape systematic error.

• A: Only use the MC shape fitting results to compare our results as the contribution of ccjLineshape. KsKpi channels are

Page 10: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

eAA eAB eBA eBB

Chic0 9.55% 3.17% 3.18% 9.57%

Chic1 10.43% 3.23% 3.31% 10.55%

Chic2 10.25% 3.15% 3.12% 10.31%

Page 11: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

Considering PS factor

MC shape convoluted Gauss

Page 12: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

Question 4

• MC models: As you described in App.D.1, the weighted eff. is mostly depended on the branching ratio of the intermediated states, If the fit results with a large errors, do you think it is reliable?

• A: I would like to use the weighted eff. instead of phase space eff. And change the weighted eff. based on the fitting errors, and take the difference as the systematic errors. (But it will change the final results, and some systematic errors should be redone.)

Page 13: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

mode Chic0 Chic1 chic2

h1380 0.03730.0751 0.13580.0737 0.20300.0374

f1680 0.16320.1032 0.05130.0848 0.11820.0384

3-body 0.79950.2262 0.81290.1981 0.67880.0849

eAA(%) eAB(%) eBA(%) eBB(%)

chic0 9.942.63 3.741.04 3.611.00 9.582.52

chic1 10.962.54 3.650.95 3.610.94 10.512.44

chic2 11.131.11 3.820.41 3.890.42 10.751.08

Page 14: Answers to Xugf’s questions  cj ->  KK  Liang Yan 11-11-2013

Question 5

• If some necessary and important check you did no include in your memo, only referees know what are you doing, once your draft release to the collaboration, other people probably ask the same question, you will answer the same question again and again.

• A:……