a.no. 117/20. present : sh. r.d. sharma, ld.counsel for appellant....

A.No. 117/20. 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. R.D. Sharma, Ld.counsel for appellant.

Sh. Pritish Sabharwal, Ld.counsel for respondent no.1.

None for respondent no.2 despite service.

Memo of appearance filed on behalf of respondent.

Ld. counsel for respondent seeks time to file status report

and record.

1. This is an appeal filed against the order of demolition

dated 17.02.2020. Ld. counsel for appellant has pressed

the application for ad-interim stay on the ground that

otherwise the appeal will become infructuous.

2. The submissions made are that the appellant is a Co-

operative Bank and is running its Banking functions since it

was established in the year 1969. It is further stated that in

order to start a branch in Janak Puri, New Delhi, the

appellant approached Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for

necessary permission pursuant to which permission was

granted by RBI to open a branch at Janak Puri, New Delhi.

It is further stated that the appellant approached the

respondent no.2 for allotment of office unit with Leasehold

rights in Local Shopping Complex (LSC) built and

developed by respondent no.2, DDA vide letter dated

22.01.1979, pursuant to which respondent no.2 allotted two

office units / shops no. 6 & 7 to the appellant in Local

Shopping Complex C-4/E, Janak Puri, New Delhi vide

allotment letter bearing No. F-1(262)/78-IMPL dated

03.02.1979 on lease hold basis. It is further stated that

stated that the appellant thereafter approached respondent

no.2 to remove the partition wall in between the office units

6 & 7. The DDA vide letter dated 06.04.1979 acceded to

the said request of the appellant, subject to the condition not

to damage the building. It is further stated that the appellant

thereafter vide registered sale deed dated 06.01.2006

purchased office units shop no.5 adjoining units No. 6 & 7.

It is also stated that the appellant has been regularly paying

house-tax of all the units and the temporary structure

construction raised upon the units 5, 6 and 7. It is further

stated that in August, 2019, the appellant received a notice

u/s. 343/344 of DMC and thereafter received another notice

u/s. 345A of DMC Act dated 28.10.2019. The appellant had

filed reply to the said notices. It is also stated that no illegal

construction has been carried out by the appellant in the

said units. The entire office units and temporary structures

above the said units have been assessed to property tax by

respondent no.1 since decades. It is further stated that the

as office / units in question are situated in the LSC

developed by respondent no.2 as such no demolition can be

done by respondent no.1 in the said market without the

consent of respondent no.2. It is also stated that respondent

no.1 has never raised any objection to the temporary unit

prior to09.08.2019. It is also stated that the application for

regularization of the temporary structure is pending before

the appropriate authority.

5. Heard, keeping in view the submissions made and

documents filed by appellant and as time is sought to file

status report and record, in my view appellant has made out

the case for grant of ad-interim interim stay. Respondent is

restrained from taking demolition action in the property in

question bearing no. shop no. 5, 6 and 7,LSC Market,C-4/E,

Janak Puri, New Delhi pursuant to impugned order dated

17.02.2020 till next date of hearing.

6. However, this order is subject to any order passed by

the Hon’ble Supreme Court / Hon’ble High Court / Hon’ble

NGT about sealing and demolition in respect of the property

in question.

7. Appellant is directed to file affidavit giving details of

construction with measurements of the existing construction

alongwith existing site plan and photographs of the property

in question within five working days, failing which stay order

granted shall deemed to be vacated.

8. Copy of the affidavit will be provided to concerned

AE(B) by the appellant, who shall verify whether details of

construction mentioned in the affidavit is correct or not.

9. Appellant is also directed not to carry out any

addition, alteration, repair or construction and shall also not

create any third party interest in the property in question.

10. Be listed for filing of status report and record on

11.05.2020.

11. A copy of the order be given Dasti to counsels for

parties, as prayed for.

(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.

Appellate Tribunal:MCD 13.03.2020

A.No. 760/13. 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Kedisaplung Haikam, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. Mohit Sharma, Ld. counsel for SDMC with Sh. Ravinder

Kumar, AE(B).

Sh. A.K. Shrivastav,Ld. counsel for respondents no.2 and 3.

Memo of appearance filed on behalf of appellant.

Ld. counsel for respondent seeks more time to file status

report in terms of order dated 30.11.2017, last opportunity

granted.

In case status report is not filed, concerned Dy.

Commissioner to appear on the next date.

AE(B) to be present on the next date.

To come up for filing of status report on 06.05.2020.



A.No. 747/18. 13.03.2020 Present : Appellant in person.

Sh. Sanjay Gupta, ALO for North DMC with Sh. S.K. Lakra,

LI.

Appellant states that he has moved an application with

respondent for permission to carry out rectification but he

has not received any response from the respondent till date.

Respondent is directed to decide the application within a

week and status report be filed on the next date.

Be listed for filing of status report on 06.05.2020.



A.No. 519/19, 520/19, 521/19, 522/19 and 523/19. 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Vishesh Issar,Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. R.B. Sharma, Ld. counsel for SDMC.

At request of Ld. counsel for respondent, adjourned for filing

of status report qua the affidavit of appellant regarding

details of existing construction and final arguments with the

connected appeals to 15.07.2020.



A.No. 06/20, 07/20, 08/20, 09/20 and 10/20. 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Vishesh Issar,Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. Pritish Sabharwal, Ld. counsel for SDMC.

Status report filed, copy supplied.

Ld. counsels for parties seek time to file brief synopsis.

To come up now for final arguments on 15.07.2020.

Interim order, if any, to continue till next date.



A.No. 416/19. 13.03.2020 Present : Appellant with Ld. counsel, Sh. Himanshu Singh.

Ms. Nagina Jain, Ld. counsel for North DMC with Sh.

Sanjay Gupta, ALO and Sh. Pradeep Kumar Sharma, LI.

Respondent to intimate the misuse charges payable to the

appellant.

To come up now for filing of status report by the respondent

and arguments on 22.04.2020.

The concerned LI to be present on the date fixed.



A.No. 817/19. 13.03.2020 Present : Appellant with Ld. counsel, Sh. Pooran Chand.

Sh. Ashutosh Gupta, Ld. counsel for North DMC with Sh.

Sanjay Gupta, ALO.

Time is sought to file status report and record.

Record be filed within three days.

In case the record is not filed, concerned Dy. Commissioner

to appear on the next date.




A.No. 716/18. 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Anand Singh, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. counsel for North DMC with Sh.

Sanjay Gupta, ALO and Sh. Pradeep Kumar Sharma, LI.

Ld. counsel for respondent seeks time to file further status

report regarding permissible user of the property in

question.


LI concerned to be present on the date fixed.



A.No. 78/20. 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Anuj Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. H.R. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for North DMC.

Ld. Counsel for appellant states that appellant has applied

for regularization, status report of the same be filed on the

next date.

Documents filed on behalf of appellant, copy supplied.

Appellant is directed to file the house tax receipts with effect

from the year 2004-2005 onwards.

To come up for arguments on the interim application on the

date fixed.(31.03.2020.)



A.No. 702/18. 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Shoeb Haider, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. proxy counsel for SDMC with Sh.

Faiz Ahmed, AE(B).


Ld. counsel for appellant seeks time to file objections.

Be listed on 06.05.2020.



A.No. 62/20 and 63/20. 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Dalip Rastogi, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. counsel for North DMC.

More time is sought to file status report qua the affidavit of

appellant regarding details of existing construction.

AE(B) to be present on the next date.

Be listed for filing of status report and final arguments on

23.07.2020.

Interim order to continue till next date.



A.No. 817/17. 13.03.2020 Present : None for appellant.

Sh. Pritish Sabharwal, Ld. counsel for respondent.

As none has appeared for appellant, be listed for further

proceedings on 06.05.2020.



A.No. 842/18 and 806/18. 13.03.2020 Present : Ms. Gurmeet Kaur, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for SDMC with Sh. Atharv

Mustafa, AE(B).

Ld. counsel for respondent states that there are variations in

the existing site plan furnished by the appellant and

sanctioned building plan. It is stated that to resolve the

same, a joint inspection be allowed in the presence of

Architect of appellant.

AE(B) will now inspect the premises in question on

16.03.2020 from 2.00 pm to 5.00 pm. The Architect of

appellant to be present on the said date and time.

Be now listed for filing of status report and final arguments

on 07.04.2020.



A.No. 107/20. 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Shubham Aggarwal, Ld. Proxy counsel for appellant.

Ms. Nagina Jain, Ld. counsel for North DMC with Sh. Rajiv

Garg, ALO.


Ld. counsel for respondent states that record has been

deposited in the appeal no. 602/19 titled Rajesh Kumar

Chopra Vs. North DMC.

At request of proxy counsel for appellant, adjourned for

arguments on the interim application on 20.04.2020.



A.No. 602/19. 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Shubham Aggarwal, Ld. Proxy counsel for appellant.

Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. counsel for North DMC with Sh.

Rajiv Garg, ALO.

Sh. Manoj Sharma, Ld. counsel for applicant.

An application has been moved on behalf of applicant M/s.

Hitachi Payments Services Printed Limited u/s. 151 CPC for

temporary de-sealing of the shop of the applicant for

removal of ATM and other equipments.

Ld. counsel for respondent seeks time to file reply.

Ld. counsel for respondent states that for calculation of

misuse charges the premises is required to be de-sealed.

Respondent is directed to de-seal the property of the

applicant where he is operating the ATM machine to

calculate the misuse charges on 23.03.2020 from 12.00 pm

to 3.00 pm. Applicant and appellant are directed to be

present on the said date and time. The property is only

being de-sealed only for calculation of misuse charges and

not for removal of amount from ATM or its equipment.

Respondent to re-seal the property on the same day.

Respondent will intimate to the applicant the misuse

charges which are payable. Applicant to take appropriate

steps in this regard.

To come up for reply and arguments on the application on

20.04.2020.

A copy of order be given dasti to Ld. counsel for parties, as

prayed for.



A.No. 129/20 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Dalip Rastogi, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Fresh appeal filed u/s 343 (2) of DMC Act against the order

of demolition dated 17.02.2020 alongwith application for

stay and condonation of delay. Be checked and registered.

Notice of the appeal and application be issued to the

respondent through concerned Chief Law Officer. AE(B) is

directed to appear alongwith entire record of the

proceedings, status report and reply of the appeal on date

fixed. Record be deposited in the Tribunal.

Be listed for arguments on the application for condonation of

delay and stay on 27.03.2020.

Process be given dasti, as prayed for.

The interim protection granted by the Hon’ble High Court is

extended till next date.



A.No. 128/20 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Dalip Rastogi, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Fresh appeal filed u/s 347-B of DMC Act against the order

of rejection dated 10.09.2018 alongwith application for stay

and condonation of delay. Be checked and registered.









The interim protection granted by the Hon’ble High Court is

extended till next date.



A.No. 130/20 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Rajat Aneja with Sh. Sonali Chopra, Ld. counsel for

appellant.

Fresh appeal filed u/s 347 (1) (k) of DMC Act against the

demolition alongwith application for stay. Be checked and

registered.






Be listed for arguments on the application for stay on

19.03.2020.




A.No. 120/20 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Y.P. Singh, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Fresh appeal filed u/s 254 of New Delhi Municipal Council

Act against the order of sealing dated 20.09.2019 alongwith

application for stay and condonation of delay. Be checked

and registered.











A.No. 121/20 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Y.P. Singh, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Fresh appeal filed u/s 247 (2) of New Delhi Municipal

Council Act against the order of demolition dated

29.03.2019 alongwith application for stay and condonation

of delay. Be checked and registered.











A.No. 614/19 and 615/19 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Dalip Rastogi, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. Ajay Arora with Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. counsel for

MCD and Ms. Manjusha Jha, with A Neduchazian Dy.

Commissioner, Sh. S.D. Tomar, EE(B), and Ms. Rajni

Sehdev, ALO, EDMC.

Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent.

Ld. counsel for appellant states that appellant had moved an

application under section 151 of CPC for rectification/correction

in the order dated 23.102019. It is alleged that vide order dated

23.10.2019 interim protection was granted to the appellant in

Appeal No. 614/19 filed against the order or sealing dated

24.07.2018. Respondent was restrained from taking coercive

action in the property in question. It is further stated that due to

typographical error, the date of impugned sealing order

mentioned in the order dated 23.10.2019 was 26.06.2018

instead of 24.07.2019. The respondent has therefore, sealed the

property of the appellant on 17.01.2020. It is also stated that

necessary corrections were made in the order dated 23.10.2019

in appeal No. 614/19 regarding the date of impugned order on

20.01.2020 but till date the property has not been desealed.

I have heard the Ld. counsel for parties.

It is submitted on behalf of respondent that property would

be desealed till further orders in compliance of orders dated

23.10.2019 and 20.01.2020.

To come up for compliance report and final arguments on

31.07.2020.


A copy of the order be given dasti, to Ld. counsel for parties,

as prayed for.



A.No. 77/20 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Ankur Manar, Ld. counsel for appellant.

S. Adil Hussain Ld. counsel for respondent with Sh. Rajeev

Garg, ALO and Sh. Ashwani Rana, AE(B).


At request of Ld. counsel for appellant adjourned for

arguments on the interim application to 06.05.2020.

AE(B) to be present on next date.



A.No. 855/18 and 107/19 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. K.N. Singh, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. H.R. Aggarwal / Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. counsel for

MCD.

Ld. counsel for parties seeks time to file brief synopsis.

Be listed for final arguments on 17.04.2020.




M.No. 27/19 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. K.N. Singh, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. counsel for MCD.

Sh. A.K. Jain, AE(B) Respondent No.1 in person.

An application moved for exemption from personal

appearance on behalf of R-2. Heard, in view of

submissions made he is exempted for today.

Ld. counsel for MCD seeks time to file reply to the show

cause notice.


Both respondents are directed to be present on next date.



A.No. 303/17 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. K.N. Singh, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. Gian Chand, Ld. counsel for MCD.

More time sought on behalf of MCD to file status report

regarding the regularization application. Last opportunity

granted.


AE(B) concerned to be present on next date.



A.No. 655/16 13.03.2020 Present : None for the appellant.

Sh. Pritish Sabharwal, Ld. counsel for SDMC with Sh.

Naeem, AE(B).


proceedings / final arguments on 08.05.2020.

Parties are directed to file written submissions.



A.No. 808/17 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Manan M. Sisodia, Ld. proxy counsel for appellant.

Sh. Mohit Sharma, Ld. counsel for EDMC.

Sh. Charanjeet Singh, Ld. counsel for Monitoring

Committee.

At request of Ld. proxy counsel for appellant adjourned for

arguments on 06.05.2020, as main counsel is not available

today.



A.No. 833/14 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Ajay Kumar, Ld. proxy counsel for appellant.

Sh. Ashok Kumar, Nodal Officer, NDMC with JE Sh.

Yashpal.

At request of Ld. proxy counsel for appellant adjourned for

arguments on date already fixed i.e. 23.03.2020.



A.No. 245/17 13.03.2020 Present : Ms. Zarina Begum of the appellant with Ld. counsel Ms.

N.Sehar.

Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for MCD.

Sh. Vikas Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for R-6 and R-7.

Respondent No.2 to 5 unserved.

An application moved on behalf of appellant under order 22

Rule 3 CPC to bring on record the LRs of deceased Mohd.

Jameel, , copy supplied.

To come up for reply and arguments on the application

14.05.2020.

Appellants are directed to deposit the cost before next date.



A.No. 691/19 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Sanjay Rathi with Sh. Divyansh Rathi, Ld. counsel for

appellant.

Sh. Mohit Sharma, Ld. counsel for SDMC.

Sh. Charanjeet Singh, Ld. counsel for Monitoring

Committee.

Reply filed on behalf of the appellant to the application

moved by respondent for vacation of interim stay, copy

supplied.

Ld. counsel for Monitoring Committee seeks time to file

status report.

To come up on 13.04.2020 for arguments.




M.No. 9/20 and 10/20 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Satish Kumar, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. Mohit Sharma, Ld. counsel for with AE(B) Sh. Naeem.

Ld. counsel for respondent seeks time to file reply to the

application under Contempt of court Act.

To come up for arguments on the application on

23.04.2020.

The concerned officials to be present on next date.



A.No. 818/16 and 104/2017 13.03.2020 Present : Appellant in person.

Ms. Nagina Jain, Ld. counsel for respondent .

Request is made for adjournment by appellant as his

counsel is in personal difficulty, request is opposed.

Ld. counsel for respondent has pointed out that the

appellant has not deposited the cost imposed vide orders

dated 17.08.2017. The appellant is directed to deposit the

same within three days. Ld. Counsel for respondent has

also pointed out that on the date of hearting of 30.05.2018

last opportunity was granted to appellant to address

arguments, but again today request is made for

adjournment.

In the interest of justice, one final opportunity granted for

final arguments to appellant, as his counsel is in some

personal difficulty today.

Be listed for final arguments on 04.06.2020.



A.No. 988/16 13.03.2020 Present : Shri Sandeep Verma, Ld. counsel for appellant .

Ms.Ayman Naaz, Ld. proxy counsel for respondent .

At request of Ld. counsel for respondent, adjourned for final

arguments to 08.05.2020.



A.No. 844/18 13.03.2020 Statement of Sh. Sagar Sharma, Ld. counsel for appellant Enrol No.D-

4095/2016 Chamber No.B-39 and 40 BGS Block, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi

Without oath.

I have instructions to withdraw the present appeal, the same may be

dismissed as withdrawn.

RO & AC



A.No. 25/16 and 26/16 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Anuj Garg, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.

Sh. Madan Sagar, Ld. counsel for MCD.

Sh. R.N. Oberoi, Ld. counsel for intervener.

Ld. Counsel for parties seeks time to file brief synopsis.

To come up for final arguments on 03.06.2020.

AE(B) concerned who booked the property in question to

appear on next date with explanation in terms of the order

dated 30.01.2019.

A copy of this order be given dasti to Ld. counsel for

respondent, as prayed for.



A.No. 998/16 13.03.2020 Present : None for appellant.

Sh. K.K. Arora, Ld. counsel for North DMC.

Sh. Mohit Sharma, Ld. counsel for SDMC.

Sh. Vijay Kumar, Ld. proxy counsel for applicant.





A.No. 901/16 and 391/18 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.

Sh. Dharamvir Gupta / Sh. Sanjay Sethi, Ld. Counsel for

respondent with Sh. Amar Singh, AE(B).

Status report filed stating that regularization file of the

property in question is not traceable.

Time is sought on behalf of respondent to file the status

report regarding regularization.




A.No. 622/19 13.03.2020 Present : Appellant with Ld. counsel Sh. Ajay Singh.

Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. Counsel for respondent with

Sh. Basant, L.I.


The appellant is directed to file the receipt of the misuse

charges and supply a copy of the same to the respondent.

Be listed on 06.05.2020 for arguments.



A.No. 270/14 13.03.2020 Present : None for the appellant.

Sh. Shashikant Sharma, proxy counsel for MCD.





A.No. 844/18 13.03.2020 Present : Shri Sagar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the appellant .

Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. Counsel for respondent.

Shri Suresh Kumar, PHI.

Ld. Counsel for the appellant states that he has instruction

to withdraw the appeal. The statement of Ld. Counsel for

the appellant recorded. In view of the statement of Ld.

Counsel for the appellant, the appeal stands dismissed as

withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate form.

Resultantly the impugned order dated 16.06.2016 is

confirmed. Respondent is at liberty to take action in the

property in question in accordance with law.

The file of the department, if any, be returned to the

respondent alongwith copy of this order.

File be consigned to record room.



A.No. 913/17 13.03.2020 Present : Ms. Seema Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the appellant .

Shri Sanjiv Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondent

Shri Mohit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicant.

Ld. Counsel for the appellant seeks time to file title

documents.

At request of Ld. Counsel for the appellant, adjourned for

final arguments to 04.08.2020.

Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing .



A.No. 898/18 13.03.2020 Present : Shri Sanjay Gupta, appellant in person.

Shri Ashutosh Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.

Appellant seeks adjournment as his counsel is not available

today.


Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing

(POONAM CHAUDHRY)

AD&SJ-cum-P.O. Appellate Tribunal:MCD

13.03.2020

M. in A.No. 232/15 13.03.2020 Present : None for appellant.

Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. Counsel for respondent.

The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn on 13.07.2016,

status report filed in terms of order dated 13.07.2016. The

miscellaneous file be accordingly consigned to record.



A.No. 698/18 13.03.2020 Present : Shri Jaspreet Singh, Ld. Counsel for the appellant .

Ayman Naaz, Ld. proxy counsel for the respondent.

Shri J.C. Mehendru, Ld. counsel for applicant.

Written submissions filed on behalf of appellant and

applicant. Copies exchanged.

Ld. Counsel for the respondent seeks time to file brief

synopsis.


Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing



A.No. 32/17 13.03.2020 Present : Shri Arun Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the appellant .

Ms. Sudesh Sharma, Ld. counsel for the respondent.

Final arguments heard.

Be listed for orders on 09.04.2020.



A.No. 273/18 and 97/16 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. B.S. Mathur, Ld. counsel for appellant.

Sh. Shashikant Sharma, Ld. counsel for MCD.

Ld. counsel for appellant has placed on record copy of new

rules for grant of electricity connection to building of height

of 17.5 mtrs.

Ld. counsel for respondent seeks time to verify the same.

To come up on 30.04.2020 for status report.

AE(B) to be present on next date.

Interim order to continue till next date.

(POONAM CHAUDHRY)

AD&SJ-cum-P.O. Appellate Tribunal:MCD

13.03.2020

A.No. 558/19 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Manish Srivastava, Ld. counsel for appellant.


Final arguments heard.





A.No. 379/19 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Sandeep Chauhan, Ld. proxy counsel for appellant.

Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. counsel for MCD.

At request of Ld. counsel for appellant adjourned for final

arguments to 07.07.2020.



A.No. 599/18 13.03.2020 Present : Ms. Pushpa, Ld. proxy counsel for appellant.


Ld. counsel for respondent states that appellant has till date

not deposited the misuse charges.

Ld. proxy counsel for appellant seeks adjournment as main

counsel is unwell.

At request, last opportunity granted for final arguments.

To come up on 15.05.2020.



A.No. 512/19 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Vinod Gupta, husband of the appellant.

Ms. Osita Kirti Ranjan, Ld. proxy counsel for MCD with Sh.

Raj Bhushan, Nodal Officer.

Appellant seeks adjournment as his counsel is not available

today due to death in his family.

At request adjourned for arguments to 26.05.2020.



A.No. 696/19 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Ashwini Kumar, Ld. counsel for appellant

File taken up on application moved for early hearing. Notice be issued to respondent for 29.03.2020.



A.No. 396/11 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. K. B. Gupta, Ld. counsel for appellant

None for respondent.

One regular steno is on leave. No time left.

To come up for further arguments/orders on 30.03.2020.



A.No. 60/SCM/13 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. Amit Sethi, Ld. counsel for appellant

Sh. Nilesh Sahani, Ld. counsel for respondent





A.No. 393/19 13.03.2020 Present : Appellant in person.

Sh. S. A. Hussain, Ld. counsel for North DMC





A.No. 979/15 & 976/15 13.03.2020 Present : Sh. K. B. Gupta, Ld. counsel for appellant

Sh. Sh. H.R. Aggarwal, counsel for MCD.


To come up for clarification/orders on 23.03.2020.

