UPDATE

Nat ional Forum on Educat ion s tat i s t i csJULY 27 and 28 , 2010

Annual Mandatory Collection of Elementary and Secondary

Education Data through EDFacts

Agenda

What’s going on with EDFactsEDFacts modelPackage contentsAdditions for SY 2010-11Changes from SY 2009-10Comments during the 30 day periodDirected questionsNext steps

Collection of Data

2008-09 CSPRo Significant increase in utilization of ESSo All states successfully completed their CSPR for

2008-092008-09 CCD as of July 19, 2010, 54 to

submito 51 submitted dropouto 50 submitted graduate and completers

2009-10 CCD as of July 19, 2010, 54 to submito 52 – submitted all of the seven required files

Usage of Data

Profile documents State Congressional District Local Education Agency (in development)

Evaluations and studies NCES study of assessment Charter school program

Internal Analysis Public Data:

IDEA Data (not all states from EDFacts) ED Data Express CCD Public Use Files ED National Indicators (in development – not all indicators from EDFacts) Local community dashboard on education (in development) Downloadable Public Use Files (in development)

EDFacts Model

Govern the

Data

Acquire the Data

Validate the Data

Improve Uses of the Data

Package contains

• Attachment A will be all the public notices.• Attachment B – EDFacts Data Set

– 1 – Overview– 2 – Explanation of EDFacts data– 3 – Data groups– 4 – Data categories– 5 – Civil Rights Data Collection– 6 – School Improvement Grants (SIG)– 7 – State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF)– 8 – Dispute resolution (IDEA)

• Attachment C – Changes from SY 2009-10• Attachment D – Directed questions• Attachment E – Public comment & response – 60 day• Attachment F – Public comment & response – 30 day

(IN PROGRESS)

Additions for SY 2010-11

• School Improvement Grants (SIG)• State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF)• Career and technical education for the transformation

of Perkins secondary• Reconstituted status (DG743) to mark schools that are

the same for Common Core of Data (CCD) but have a new accountability history.

• Computer equipment table (DG744) including other devices and excluding computers not connected to the internet.

• Preschool suspension and expulsion (DG746) added to CRDC.

Changes from SY 2009-10

• Combining the Assessment data for ESEA with IDEA

• Career and Technical Education for Perkins transformation, early implementation

• Educational Environment (IDEA) Early Childhood• High school graduation rate indicator status

divided into met (target) and met (goal)• Homeless “enrolled” instead of homeless

“served” for assessment, graduation, and dropout

Public Comments for the 30 day period

• Civil Rights Data Collection• Discipline Data• Education Environment (IDEA) Early

Childhood• School Improvement Grants (SIG)• State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF)• Technology Data• More discussion on the directed questions• Technical comments

Directed Questions

Charter Schools and Districts – Supplemental Information How to collect the data efficiently 60 day – Preference for a new ESS file 30 day - One SEA restated preferred adding to directory Decision – New ESS file

Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) - Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 Implement changes early 60 day – Preference for option to implement early 30 day - One SEA ready for early implementation Decision – Offer early implementation

Discipline Collect both student counts and incidents 60 day – Provide reasons why both need to understand the school safely climate 30 day - One SEA need guidance on incidents Decision – Improve the file specification guidance

Directed Questions

Dispute Resolution – IDEA Table 7 (OMB 1820-0677) Move to EDFacts 60 day – Move into EMAPS 30 day - One SEA agreed, One SEA disagreed Decision – Move into EMAPS

Expulsion/Suspensions or “More Than One Day” Collecting by Expulsion/Suspensions (CSPR) or “more than one day” (EDFacts) 60 day – Leave as is, need more consensus on discipline data 30 day - One SEA disagreed with not changing EDFacts, Another disagreed with ever

moving to “more than one day” Decision – Need more consensus on discipline data

Headcount and Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) of State Migrant Education Program (MEP) Collecting state director manually through CSPR and not through EDFacts 60 day – Preference for manual 30 day - One SEA agreed with decision Decision - Manual

Directed Questions

Homeless Students Change from “served” to “enrolled” 60 day – Preferred “served” 30 day - One SEA agreed with decision Decision – “served”

Magnet Schools How to collect better data 60 day – Better definitions 30 day - No comments Decision – work through data governance

Open Enrollment Collecting an indicator of open enrollment to interpret public school choice data 60 day – More complex, ED will need some metadata 30 day - One SEA asked about metadata needed Decision – Explain need some metadata at state level

Directed Questions

State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) How to collect 60 day – Combination of ESS and EMAPS 30 day - One SEA agreed with collecting using both ESS and EMAPS Decision – Combination of ESS and EMAPS

School Improvement Grants (SIG) How to collect 60 day – ESS files 30 day - One SEA disagreed, preferred EMAPS Decision – Use ESS

Directed Questions

Statewide Assessments – Academic Achievement and Participation Combine ESEA and IDEA assessment files 60 day – Combine the files 30 day - Two SEAs agreed, One disagreed concerned about complexity, comments about

data quality process Decision – Combine, build a new data quality process

Status Files How should single number and status data groups be organized into files 60 day – Used SEA ideas and created a plan 30 day - Two SEAs asked about placement of one data group Decision – More that one data group

Title I Status Collect program type with program eligibility 60 day – Leave as is 30 day - One SEA agreed with decision Decision – Leave as is

Next Steps

Section Change Explanation for Change

All “New” and “Revised” notes are removed for items that were “new” or “revised” in the 30-day package.

Unless noted otherwise in the document, these changes have been incorporated into the final package. Text marked as “new” or “revised,” indicated text that has been added or changed since the 30-day public comment period version of the document was released.

Introduction Added Attachments B6, B7, and B8 to list of parts of Attachment B

While these attachments were included in the original clearance package, they were inadvertently excluded from the list of sections within Attachment B.

• Submit Attachment F• Summarize the comments during the 30 days• Contain ED’s response

• Submit the other Attachments• Changes because of the comments and any error correction• Include “Appendix A” in each listing the changes

Appendix A