anna magdalena bojko, a089 059 545 (bia sept. 30, 2013)

7/27/2019 Anna Magdalena Bojko, A089 059 545 (BIA Sept. 30, 2013)

1/15

Burton, Justin EsquireKrezelma, Buon & Assocates, LC20 Noh Cak Steet, Sute 725hicago, IL 60602

Name: BJK, ANNA MAGDAENA

US

Executve Oce r Immigaion Review

Bd ppOc h Ck

507 Leburg Pike, Sute 000Fals Chc Vgna 04

OHS/C ce f he Counse - CHI525 West Van Buen SteetChicago, I 60607

A 089-059-545

Date of ths notce: 9/30/2013

Ecosed s a copy of he Boad's decisio ad orde he above-reeced case.

cosre

Pl Mb: Hgh G A G

Scerely,

D cDoa Cr

Chef Cerk

T

m: k

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Anna Magdalena Bojko, A089 059 545 (BIA Sept. 30, 2013)


2/15

t

US Dpatmt of JtcExecutive Oce r Imaon Review

Decison of te Bod of Imatio Appeals

Fas Chc, Vign 041

File A089 059 545 - Chco, IL De:

In e AA MAGDALENA BOJKO

N EMOVA PROCEEDNGS

APPA

ON EHALF OF RESPONDENT Juin Bon Equie

ON BEHALF OF DHS J. WoolAan e Counel

APPLICATON Ajuen o u

SEP ao 21

The eponen nve an cizen o Pol, pel om e Immion Jue'ecion e Novembe 29 2011, enyin he enewe jumen o u pliion uneecon 245() o e Immon an Noniy Ac "A), 8 USC 1255(). eeonen w ane onay epue une ecion 2Bb) o he A, 8 .SC 229cb)(. Te Depmen o omen Secy e be n ooo Te pewll be mie

We evew cle eo he nn o c, ncluin e eenon o ceibiiy,me by he Immion ue 8 CFR 1003()(3)) We eview e novo ohe iue,

nclun whehe he e hve me he elevan buen o poo, an iue o iceion8 .FR 131 (3)i) Te plc elie om emov be he uen o oo oebih e uoy iceiony eby jume o ee econ2(c))A) o e Ac, 8 C 1229c)4)A); 8 CFR 208(); see ls Mter fZmr 25 &N Dec 606, 09 (A 2011).

The eponen e vou umen on ppel. On eview, we uhol he mmionJue' eemnion h he eonen no mee he buen o eblh eiibliy jumen o u une econ 25) o he A ( 58) The eco eec heeponen e hvn been ne chne o u om H2B emoy woke o Fuen n Seembe 206, ene n nuhoze empoyme J ; Exh 2, Exh. 3

Tb A, D, T 379 ee eco 25c)8) 25k o e A econ27A(h)(3) o he A 8 .S.C 32(h)(3) 8 CF 274c)(9), 245(b)() Teeco nes h e eonen onne he empomen oe an Fs seom Sepembe 200 unl he eceve he employmen uhoizion ca n Auu 07 peo h eceee 80 y (J 8 Eh 2, Exh. 3 Tb A, E T. 3739, 41) The

Depe he eponen eon on ppe he Immon Je poely eece hiiicion ove he eponen' enewe pplcion jumen o u he qlieue he avn ien eepon (eponen' B 7) ee 8 CF 2452()()()ter iitng 25 I&N ec 8 (BIA 2009) see s Mtter fArrby, 25 &N Dec 771(BIA 202)



3/15

A09 059 545

responden dd not poe evdence o show a she, as a F- student, had auoition o beeployed a Joe and anks auage" o epeber 206 to August 207, hs ng odeonstrae ha she d no violate e tes of er - student saus, or tha she ws not bedo adusg satus because se ad engaged atozed eployen (J at 8; xh 2,

Ex 3 a Tabs A, D, E; r at 37-3, 41) See secons 245(c)() d 245(k) of e Ac; see also8 CR 22((9), 274a2(c)(3), 245(b)() The respondent has not addess s sseon appeal

Moreover, the espondent as not deonstaed hat se is centy n lau staus puoses of adjustment o satus e responden admed that she is no onger eployed bJoe ad ranks Sausage" because it wen ou o business n 20, and ha she staed wokngr a new eploye n 20 (J at 7; xh 7; r a 35-37) Howee, he respondent dd no

poe a labo ceicaion and n approved empomen-based sa petion (Fo -40) toesablsh the poabilty of he new emploent nde sectn 24) of the Act, .C. 154). See, e.g, T a 47-49; see generally Matter f arca[ Net, 25 &N ec. 69,

175-76 (BIA 20) (sating ha the Imigaton ge as the auty to deermine whethethe vadiy of alien's approed eployent-based visa petiton is peseed ude section20) o he Act ae he alen has changed jobs or eples). She also did not proeevdence o establsh tha she s othewse egbe to adjust sas based on mant satha s edately avalable t he ee, eg, T at 47-9) ee secton 245(a)(3) o he Ac;8 CFR 1245 he respondent has not addessed ese ssues on appea

In addtion, we e no pesuaded by the respondent's gumens on appea hat any perid ofnlawl stas at occured prior o her Ocober 20 poe nto te Uned Sates s eeano her elgbly r adusent of saus (Respondents Br at 5-6) For purposes o secon25(k) o e Ac, he espondent's paroe nto he ned tates in Ocober 20 dd no

conste a lawl adsso d her prole dd no esa he 8-day perod cockee

eorandu om Donald Neufeld, Actng Associae Drecto, oesic Operatons CS,QDOMO 70/231-P AD06-07, Aplicabili of ection 245) to Certan Employment-BasedAustment o tatus Applcations Fled Under Secin 245(a) of the Immgaion andNanali ct (Juy , 200); see generay Matter of Arraally, sura, at 777; c Samirahv Holder, 627 Fd 652, 65-60 (7 Cir 210)

Becaue he respondent is nelgible r adjusen of saus unde secon 245(k) o he Act,she did no ee her buden to establsh her elgibty adjusment of satus nde section245(a) o he Ac See sectons 240(c)(4)(A) d 25(a) o e Act; CFR 124.(d) Inlight of our dispostion, we need nt address the oter guments ased on appeal and we dno basis to reand e case r her proceedngs ee N Bagamasbad, 29 S 2, 25-26(1976); Matter ofH, 23 & ec 462, 66 (BIA 2002)

The aon Jdges erence o e respodents pole n Agus 2 28" s ahaless scvenes eror (.J at 2)

3 Alhough no binding on he Boad, he C eoandu ced provdes uel, pactcgudace at s not contadced by secon 25(k) of e Act r y reated reglaons.



4/15

, A089 059 55

herere, we wil dimi the reondent' el Hoeve, the igtion Judgegrnted he reondent volutry dee, d he reondent oided the Bod ih roof

h he oed he ond oun et by he mmigrtion udge, e ll reintte he mmigrtionJdge' of t reief See 8 CFR 120.26(c( e of Gmeo, 25 I&N Dec. 16(BA 2010. Accordingly, the llowing order wll be entered.

OER: he pel i dimied

FURHER ORER: Purut to the mmigrtion Judge' ode nd conditioned oncoplince wh condition e f y he Immition Judge d he tue, the reondent i

permiedo volntrily de the United Ste, without exene to the Goveent, win 60dy om he de of h order or ny exenion eyond t time my e gted y heDement of Homelnd Security (DHS" See ecion 20B(b of he mmigrtion ndNtionlity Act, 8 U.C 1229c( ee lo 8 C.R. 120.26(c, (. n he event ereondent fil to volntly de the United Stte, the reonden hll e removed

provided in the igrtion Judge' orde.

NOCE f the repondent fil to voluntrly de the Ued Ste wihin he timeperio pecied, or ny extenion gred y the DHS, he reondent hll e uect o civilpenty provided y he reglion d he e nd hl be ineligible r eod of 0yer r ny her relief nder ection 20B nd ection 20, 25, 28, d 29 of he AcSee ecion 20B(d of he ct

WAG f the reonden e motion to reoen or reconider ror to he exirtion ofhe voluy dee erod et h bove, the grn of volunty dee i utoticllyemined the eriod lowed r volunt deure i not tyed, toled, o extended f thegrnt of volunty deue i utoticlly teined uon the ling of moion, he enlie

r ile o depr under ecion 20B(d of e c hll no ply. See 8 CR 20.26(e(

WANG If, rior to deing he ed Ste, he reponden le y udicilchlenge o hi dminirively nl order, ch peition review unt to ecion22 of he Act, 8 USC 1252, the grn of volnt ee i utomticly teinted, ndhe lete order of reovl hll mediely ke eect. However, if he reponden le petiion r review d then de he United Stte ithin 0 y of uch ling, hereponden wll not e deee o hve eed ner order of remov if e lien rovide

o he DHS ch evidence of h or her deure th the igrtion nd Cutom EnforcementField Oce Director of the DHS y reqie d rovide evidence DHS deem ucien h

he or he h remned ouide of he Ued Se he enlie r ie to dep underection 20B(d of the c hll not ply o n lien who le petiion r review,notwistding any period of time e or e en he ne Se hie he peiionr review i pending See 8 C.F.R. 120.26(i

3



5/15

-.(

ITE TAE EPATET O JTIEEXEIE OFICE OR IMIGRATO REIE

NITE AE IIGAIO Chco Illnos

Fe o A 89 9 oee 9

In he Me of

AN AGALENA BOKO I EMOVA POEEIG

CHARGE:

APPLICAIO:

esponden

I& Ac eon ( (A i {I - nen no n possesson of ld eny doens

Aden of ss nde econ (; o ne lene ony depe.

ON BEHAL OF EPOET: O BEHAL OF H:

Jeffey Kezen Es M Woodll EsMnne n Es

Asssn Chef Conses

OAL ECIION OF THE IIGRATI GE

The esponden -yeold ed len ne nd

czen of Polnd. he esponden fs eneed he ned

es s epo oe -B on Jly I s ne

s o o o e esoe s ozed o emn in e

ned es s n HB epoy oe. oee he

esponden s ozed o o fo Go een In. o


6/15

i I \

olorado Springs, olorado However becase of n nknown

eason he responden ony emained a Gro Managemen for

approximaey one monh befo she eloaed o hicago, inois

and began wokig, apparely, as a cook for oe and anks

Sasage

e esponen oninosy worked for oe an ranks

Sasage beginning fro ugs 200 n hey en o of

business n 200Ding he orse of her empoymen, oe and

anks Sasage fied a abo cerificaion on e esponden's

behalf ha as approved -40 peiion as fied in

Deee 200 and approved in y o 2006 he responen,

rogh her aorney, sbmied an appicaion or permann

residence sas o US S on gs 5, 200, based pon he

approed -40 eiion fie on r beaf by Joe and ranks

Sasage h responden aso reeived empoyme auhoizaon

beginning on gs 5, 200 based pon her pending applicaion

for permanen residence sas

Dring e pendency of e appiaon, he resonden

qesed perission o leav he Unied Saes and rern o

oland dvancd paroe was graned on gs 22, 2008, and he

responden rerned o he nied Saes on paroe on gs 29,

200.

olloing he espondn's ern o e Unid Saes r

appicaion was denied by he Dieor of USS n a decision

aed Noveber 2, 200 n he decision denying e respondens

089 059 545 2 Noveer 29, 2


7/15

aiion, he Direcor o SS revewed he acs o he

resonden's ase inuding a newy sbmed or G

(bograhi nomaion) hich eeed ha he resonden on

remaned, aareny, Gro Managee or one onh beore

oving o hiago o wor or oe and ans Susage eginning n

gs o 00 he resonden, aording o he Drecor,

hereore, wored wiho auhozaon n he Unied Saes rom

ugs 00 o Seeber 006 and om ovemer 006 o ugs

, 007 wihou a oery issued eoen ahorizaion

docuen hereoe, he Direcor o SS deermined nder he

regaons ha he resonden had nahorzed emoymen ad

was bred rom ayi or eaen residence sas in he

Uned Saes See, generaly, 8 R 7a (a, (b) , or () he resonden as subseueny aed unde remova

roeedngs, and a Noe o ea was ied on anuay ,

0 he inia heaing hed on Seee , 00, he

esonden, hog ounse, aied he rs hree aegaions

o a, dened ha he esonden as no n osesson o

a vaid gran visa or oher vaid enr docen when she

rerned on aroe ounse o he reonden, aso ro orma

dened he chage o reovabiiy unde Seon (a) (7) () (i) ()

H SSU RMOVY

he as o he resonden's ase are no onesed

Resonden onedes h she e he Unied aes whie he

089 09 Noveer 9, 0


8/15

appcaion fo pemanen esidence sas was pending and

ened on advanced paoe on o abo cobe 29 208 Te

espnden, hogh e aoney, conceded hat she was o

possesson of a vaid iga sa o ohe vad issed vsa

ha wod aow e o be eadmied o e Uned Saes Ude

e egaions 8 R l.q), an aien who en o he Une

Saes on paol is cosdee o _be an aing alien Ude

ccmsances of he espoden's case, se was no in possession

o a vaid igan vsa o ohe vaid ey docen a he

ime she euned on paoe eeoe, fnd emovaby ha

been esabised by evdence, whic is ce and convncng o

e chage conained i he oce o ppea

PP R R U MV

he esponde's aoney idicae a a coninued emova

heag hed on Mac 8 0 ha he decsio dening he

esponden's appicaon o emanen esidence by was in

eo he esponden's aoney aged ha he espondens

empoymen fo oe and as Sasage fm gs 200 o

epebe 006 and fom ovee 006 o ugs 5 00 cod be

consdeed coveed empoymen nde he ogina admission as a

empoay woe HB ounse o he espode aso ageda wen he esones oigan sas exe (no

evdence was pesened wen hs acualy occed e

espoden applied fo a nongan chage of sas o a of

a sden, whch was ganed on Sepebe 8, 006 s, e

089 059 545 4 Novembe 29 20


9/15

/(

respode's aorey arged ha her coned emoe a Joe

ad ras Sasage cod no be cosdered ahored

empoe becse she had een graed a cage of gr

sas

he Goernen oney opposes he responden's orey's

erpreao of he a. he Goverme ore arges ha

he respoden os he rgh o be empoyed he ed es

once she changed empoyers n gs of 200 ho reesg

aoraon fro user. he Goernen orey sed e fac

ha he respoden nee receed empoyme ahoro e

she orked for Joe ad anks Sasage l fer she sed

he apcaon for pemanen resdence sas 2007. hs

he Goermen oney conends ha he respondes empoe

for Joe and raks Sasage begnng gs of 200 as

nahored empoe der he regaos

AS S D COSO

s cea fro he facs o e respodes case h she

dd o have a aidy sse empoye ahoraon docuen

for her empoe a Joe ad rans Sasage egg gs

of 200 Whe her aorney coends ha her admsso s a

emorry oer 2B o ork a Go Managemen shod coe her

empoyen a Joe and anks Sausage, no ahory as bee ced

for hs proposo

der he regaons, a person s o ahored o chage

gra 2B emoyers ho some ofcaon o s

0 05 545 5 oeer 20


10/15

and athoization to do so Hee the spondent contends that

Got Management failed to notify uss that the espondent hadleft he tempoay position and, theefoe, she is not

esponsile o he contined emploment in the United States

do not ead the eglations at 8 FR Section 24 (h) (1 (i)

nd the sbseqent eglations petining to tempoay eplomet

as an H2 to exclpate a espondent fom notifying uss o

contining to e employed in the United States fom an employe

who did not sponso he noniigant H2 status t is clea

om the ecod that the espondent egan woking o an

nauthoized eploye shotly ate she aive in the United

States lthough, this employe subseently otained a labo

cetfication and filed an 40 petition on the espondent's

ehaf, the espondent only eceived a validly issed emploment

athoization document in conjncton with he application fo

emploment on gust 5, 2007 hus it is clea that the

espndent woked without athoization and withot a poely

and validly issed emploent athoization docment o moe

than six months in the United States his fact makes he

ineligile o adjustment of stats in the United States nde

Section 25 c .

t the contined emoval heaing held on Mach 28, 200, the

espondent eveled o the ist time that she was no longe

1 The respodent's attrey rgues tat when se ws aitted as H2-B se wasathrized to be in the United Sttes fr but five yes and was lso uthrized t

b empoyed i the Onited ttes for ve years rerdess f er eployer. wever,this contention ws ever supprted by ay dcentry evidence hus I do t fidtt the respdet has estbise that se was

atorized t be eloyed in te

089 059 545 6 Noveme 29, 21


11/15

orng or te eploer tat a ponsore er labor

ertaton. e reponent' attorne argue tat er

eploet a "portable uner te reglaton an tat her

urrent poton o be aeptable ner er ol labor

ertaton applaton. Hoever, epte t ontenton the

reponent never le an evene pportng er teor. e

ort rete te responet on Mar 28, 01 to bt te I-

10 petton, te abor ertaton an eene tat er ob

as, n at, portable. e reponent not fle an evene

ggetng tat er job as portable, at all.

t te te, o te al earng el on Noveer 29, 211

te reponent' attore btte a etter ro te

reponent' ne eploer alle Sta Retauat. letter

ate Mar 28, 211 uggest tat the e to eplo te

responent n te apat o a peat oo for ter ol

retarant. oever, at te ontne earng te reponent

atte tat er forer eploer ent ot of bne n 201

an tat he onl reentl n Noveer o 2 began orng or

er preent epoer n te absene o evene ong tat

te repoet ob ental or slar or ta te present

eploer atuall eplos the reponent at te sae evel, the

ae pa ale a te nforaton at le to e prevo abo

ertaton, t Cort one tat te reponent a

fale to so tat er job portable. ean tat te

responent ut start te labor ertato proe all over

Uite Stte Je Fks Se beini i Auut f 2001

89 09 7 Noveer 29, 20


12/15

agan.

I al reject te reponent' attrne' cntento tatcanging nnigran atu t a F1 uet cver er or

purpoe r eplent. Noere te tuent reulaon e

t prvie ta pl canng a autrize a norant

alen t be eploe n e ite Sate. Altu te

repnent, apparentl reeve eter rentateent or a

traner o atu t at o an 1 onirant tuent,

reponent ale preent an evence ing tat e a

auorze t be eploe n e ne Stae urn te pero

o e tat e a a ue. e fac reveal at e

reponen antaine er eplent at Je an ran Sauae

alt ntinuoul nce Aut o 001. u tout an

evece ubtte b e repnen, Court cannt oncue

ta e reponet a te rt to be eploe n e Une

State beeen te te e arrve e Une Stae on ul

, 001 untl e tie e reeve epent autorzaton n

Augut 1, 00 Acrl I repnent applcatn

r auent o tatu uner Sen a f te Act ut be

ene 2

Bae upn te regn n te reponent reque

r autent tatu uner Seton (a e A ut be

enie.

2 The respondnt, through hr attorne ws also advisd to estbis herprorty dt and to sho s numr aaity. Hre rsondent neversubmitted the origin laor crtfcaton nd thror ths Court canntven conclde that visa nr as vailabe for when th rspondntntil d her cton

A 09 09 8 Nveber 9 011


13/15

!

THE AATIO OR OTARY ARTR

Te Goveret Attore opposes vlutar eparture an

tens tat a arrvg ale s ot elgble or volunta

eparture uer te ters o te statute. However, beleve

arvg ale are ol lgble or voutar epartur at

t tal stages o te proeegs uer Seton 20B (a (.

Here t reset s essetall seeg vlutar eparture

at te lso o preegs uner Setn 20B (b a ol

ees to sow oeear psal presee pror to beg plae

uer proeegs Here respoet a et te

reureents or volutar eparture, a tat request wll be

grante

Aorgl, te ollowg orer wll be etere

ORER:

IT S ORRE tat te respoet's applaton or

peraet resee status uer Seto 2 (a o te At be

ene

S RTHR ORERD tat te reponet be grante

volntar epartur se eparts te e States on r beore

auar 28, 012.

S URTHR ORDR tat te respoet post a $1, 000

voluar eparture bon wt fve a ts es to

al or volutar eparture.

T S RTHR ORRD tat te repent als t epart

wen a as requre, ts prvlege o vluntar eparture sall

A 08 9 oveer 29, 20


14/15

/

atotall be tdra and the ollog order hall

therepon beoe edatel efetve e reponden hall be

deported and reoved ro the nted State to oland on te

harge ontaned the Note to Appear.

jROBERT . NOORted State gatonuge

A 089 09 10 Novee 9 2011


15/15

CRFA A

I(\,

hereb ertf that te atthed proeeding beore

JGE ROBR . VNKOOR, n e atter of

ANNA MAAENA BOO

A 089 09

Chao, no

an aurte, erbat trnrpt o the reordng a proded b

the xeute Offe for grao ee d tat th te

orna tranrpt thereo for the fe o he xete Offe

for raton Ree

Free State Report, n

Janur 2, 21opleon dte)

B bon of th ERFCA AGE, the Cotrator etfetat a on BE/1, -ne trnrbr or equalent adorC erbed n Seton C, pararaph C3.3 of te ontrat e to tranrbe the Reord o roeedng on n the aboepragr

anna magdalena bojko, a089 059 545 (bia sept. 30, 2013)

Documents