animal welfare: prospects and possibilities robert garner

23
ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

Post on 21-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

ANIMAL WELFARE:PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES

ROBERT GARNER

Page 2: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

• THE ORIGINS AND MEANING OF ANIMAL WELFARE

• A PHILOSOPHICAL CRITIQUE OF ANIMAL WELFARE

• ANIMAL WELFARE POLITICS

Page 3: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER
Page 4: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER
Page 5: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER
Page 6: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER
Page 7: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

THE ORIGINS AND MEANING OF ANIMAL WELFARE

INDIRECT DUTY VIEWS

RENE DESCARTES

Page 8: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

WHY JUSTICE?

• Carries greater moral weight than kindness or charity

• The impact of moral pluralism:

Page 9: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

THE ORIGINS AND MEANING OF ANIMAL WELFARE

THE INFLUENCE OF BENTHAM AND THE UTILITARIANS

THE QUESTION IS NOT CAN THEY REASON, NOR, CAN THEY TALK. BUT, CAN THEY SUFFER?

Page 10: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

THE ORIGINS AND MEANING OF ANIMAL WELFARE

• THE CONCEPT OF UNNECESSARY SUFFERING

• ROBERT NOZICK ‘UTILITARIANISM FOR ANIMALS, KANTIANISM FOR PEOPLE’.

Page 11: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

A PHILOSOPHICAL CRITIQUE OF ANIMAL WELFARE

Page 12: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER
Page 13: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

CAN ANIMALS BE RECIPIENTS OF JUSTICE?

1.Care more effective than justice

2.Animals do not have sufficient moral status to be worthy recipients of justice

Page 14: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

CAN ANIMALS BE RECIPIENTS OF JUSTICE?

• Not worthy because:

1.No moral standing at all

2.Moral standing but not enough moral status (Rawls).

Page 15: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

CAN ANIMALS BE RECIPIENTS OF JUSTICE?

• Animals can benefit from the distribution of benefits and rewards. They can’t reciprocate but then neither can marginal humans or young children.

Page 16: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

CAN ANIMALS BE RECIPIENTS OF JUSTICE?

• Implications of accepting Rawls’s exclusion of animals:

1.Impact of moral pluralism.

2.The impact of excluding animals from the original position.

Page 17: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

WHAT FORM SHOULD A THEORY OF JUSTICE FOR ANIMALS

TAKE?• Ideological tradition

• Liberal problems

(a) moral pluralism

(b) liberal political economy

(c) history of animal exploitation

Page 18: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER
Page 19: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

WHAT FORM SHOULD A THEORY OF JUSTICE FOR ANIMALS

TAKE?Alternative liberal approaches

* Rights (Regan)

* Utility (Singer)

* Contractarianism (Rowlands)

* Welfare

Page 20: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

WHAT FORM SHOULD A THEORY OF JUSTICE FOR ANIMALS

TAKE?• A Defence of Animal Welfare

Animal welfare philosophically flawed

Pragmatic grounds for accepting welfare

(A version of New Welfarism – Francione)

Page 21: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

A CRITIQUE OF NEW WELFARISM

Page 22: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

WHAT FORM SHOULD A THEORY OF JUSTICE FOR ANIMALS

TAKE?• A Moral Justification for Animal Welfare?

• Oakeshott ‘A Philosophy of Politics’

Page 23: ANIMAL WELFARE: PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES ROBERT GARNER

WHAT FORM SHOULD A THEORY OF JUSTICE FOR ANIMALS TAKE?

• Applying James Gustafson’s model of Moral Discourse to the Animal Ethics Debate

• ethical, narrative, policy and prophetic.

• Menno Kamminga – Moral discourse and climate change