wwf - measuring and communicating high level results © pj stephenson

Click icon to add picture

WWF - Measuring and communicating high level results

© PJ Stephenson

© PJ Stephenson

Challenges - Diverse programme portfolio

© PJ Stephenson

© PJ Stephenson

Namibian National CBNRM Programme 2002 - Benefits

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Conservancy Non-Financial Benefits

NR-based Household/Wage Income

Conservancy / Enterprise Committee Income

© Martin Harvey/WWF-Canon

© WWF-Canon/Folke WULF

Few examples of programmes monitoring impact

LIFE Project, Namibia

INSIGHT

Key elements of the improved GPF monitoring & reporting system

The system is based on whatis already good practice:• Strategic plans• Indicators for goals and objectives• Data collection and analysis• Reporting (using data)• Peer review and evaluations

© PJ Stephenson

· Initial team· Scope & vision· Targets & threats· Context & stakeholders

1. Define

· Goals & objectives· Strategic activities· Monitoring plan· Operational plan

2. Design

· Workplans & budgets· Fund raising· Capacity building· Partnerships

3. Implement

· Incoming data· Results & assumptions· Operational functions· Plans & budgets

4. Analyze/Adapt

· Lessons· Products· Feedback & evaluation· Learning culture

5. Share

WWF’s Conservation

Project/Programme Cycle

Indicator StatusS1. Habitat cover In use - data availableS2. Habitat fragmentation In use - data availableS3. Flagship species populations In use – data availableS4. Environmental flows Under development – freshwater

prog.S5. State of the ocean (to be determined) Under development – marine

prog.S6. Species diversity index To be developedP1. Habitat loss and degradation  In use - data availableP2. Offtake of flagship species Under development – TRAFFICP3. Over-exploitation of footprint species Under development – TRAFFICP4. River fragmentation FINALIZEDP5. CO2 gas emissions In use - data availableP6. Energy consumption In use - data availableR1. Size of protected areas In use - data availableR2. Protected area management effectiveness

In use - data available

R3. Wildlife trade Under development – TRAFFICR4a. Sustainable production of commodities In use - data available

R4b. Sustainable production of commodities In use - data available

R5. Sustainable production of energy In use - data available

R6. Sustainable production of water To be confirmed by footprint progs.

B1. Number of beneficiaries Under development – SD4C

I1. Partnerships Under development - CSPU

WWF common programme indicators

Considerations for selecting marine indicators

Complement what we have alreadyUse what existing programmes need :- Global priority places with marine ecoregions (Arctic,

Coastal East Africa , Coral Triangle, Galapagos, Madagascar, Mediterranean , Southern Chile, Southern Ocean , Southwest Pacific, West Africa Marine

- Smart fishing- Market transformation- Global Marine ProgrammeOverarching principles for common indicators: - keep them based on what teams need anyway- keep number low- make them feasible and cost effective

© PJ Stephenson © PJ Stephenson

© PJ Stephenson © PJ Stephenson/WWF-Canon

Place-based Programme Dashboard

Species dashboard

Climate and energy programme

Global 2020 Places Goal:Are WWF priority places protected and well managed?

Share, learn, improve

Creating partnerships and policies to collect, analyze and share data

Harmonizing indicators and monitoring systems

Renewing efforts to fill data gaps

Using data to inform decision-making, policy development and adaptive

management

Developing new indicators with a bottom up

approach so data are also relevant to national

or local project monitoring

  © PJ Stephenson